Next Article in Journal
Hepatoprotective Effect of Curcumin Nano-Lipid Carrier against Cypermethrin Toxicity by Countering the Oxidative, Inflammatory, and Apoptotic Changes in Wistar Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities and Acute Toxicity of Cedrus atlantica, Chenopodium ambrosioides and Eucalyptus camaldulensis Essential Oils
Previous Article in Journal
Antiviral Activity of Benzoheterocyclic Compounds from Soil-Derived Streptomyces jiujiangensis NBERC-24992
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Content of Extractives in the Bark of the Trunk and the Bark of the Branches of Silver Fir (Abies alba Mill.)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules28020879
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elucidation of Natural Components of Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves: Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

by
Eman M. EL-Shial
1,2,
Amal Kabbash
1,
Mona El-Aasr
1,
Ola A. El-Feky
3 and
Suzy A. El-Sherbeni
1,*
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Horus University, New Damietta 34518, Egypt
3
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020879
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction, Identification and Isolation of Chemical Compounds in Natural Matrices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The rising prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease NAFLD has strained the healthcare system. Natural products could solve this problem, so the current study focused on the impact of G. thunbergia Thunb. against this ailment. LC–ESI–MS/MS revealed the phytochemical profile of the methanol extract from Gardenia thunbergia leaves (GME). Forty-eight compounds were tentatively identified, and stigmasterol, fucosterol, ursolic acid, and rutin were isolated. The separation of the last three compounds from this plant had not before been achieved. The anti-NAFLD effect of the methanol extract of the leaves of G. thunbergia, and its major metabolite, rutin, was assessed in mice against high-fructose diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Male mice were allocated into nine groups: (1) saline (control), (2) 30% fructose (diseased group), (3) HFD, and 10 mg/kg of simvastatin. Groups 4–6 were administered HFD and rutin 50, 75, and 100 mg/kg. Groups (7–9) were administered HFD and methanol extract of leaves 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg. Methanol extract of G. thunbergia leaves at 200 mg/kg, and rutin at 75 mg/kg significantly reduced HFD-induced increments in mice weight and hepatic damage indicators (AST and ALT), steatosis, and hypertrophy. The levels of total cholesterol, LDL–C, and triglycerides in the blood decreased. In addition, the expressions of CYP2E1, JNK1, and iNOS in the diseased mice were downregulated. This study found that GME and rutin could ameliorate NAFLD in HFD-fed mice, with results comparable to simvastatin, validating G. thunbergia’s hepatoprotective effects.

1. Introduction

The active ingredients of herbal medicine and natural products have recently received increased attention as prospective therapeutic agents for the treating, and preventing of NAFLD, owing to their outstanding levels of effectiveness and minimal risks of adverse effects [1]. Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. (family Rubiaceae), Star Gardenia, is a shrub or small tree that thrives in Egypt and many African and Asian nations [2]. The flavonoids, terpenoids, iridoids, and steroids found in the Gardenia family have many therapeutic advantages, including anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antioxidant properties, which may be attributed to flavonoids [3,4]. In the present study, LC–ESI–MS/MS was utilized to reveal, tentatively, the phytochemicals of the leaves of the plant. Recently, products from natural sources have become a substantial basis of pharmaceuticals, and they are actively being researched as potential therapeutic candidates [5]. They have a lot of benefits, including being risk-free, effective, biocompatible, and affordable [6]. Natural products, as a result, can be a successful method for preventing the emergence of various disorders, including NAFLD.
NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) is a type of liver ailment that negatively impacts people’s lives. The global prevalence of NAFLD has risen to 40% [7]. NAFLD progresses from a benign condition to a threatening disease of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, followed by pericellular fibrosis in NASH, which can lead to cirrhosis and liver cancer [7]. Steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and, eventually, hepatocellular cancer, are all part of the pathophysiology of NAFLD. As a result, there is currently no pharmaceutical treatment for NAFLD [8,9]. Instead, almost all patients are offered food and lifestyle guidelines and instructions to increase physical activity to lose weight [10]. A treatment plan is complicated by the complexity of the pathways involved in the genesis of NAFLD. It was found that oxidative stress is a critical element in the disease’s etiology, even though the pathophysiology is complicated [11]. Multiple investigations found that a high-fat and fructose diet causes hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in the liver sinusoidal endothelium, which is mediated, at least in part, by the activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [12]. In addition, Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) contributes significantly to oxidative stress in NAFLD. The oxidoreductase cytochrome family causes the oxidation of different molecules, such as fatty acids, and others [13]. CYP2E1 plays a major role in NAFLD, as the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anions, are increased after excessive fat buildup, causing oxidative injuries [13].
The c-Jun N-terminal kinases (c-JNKs), represent a group of protein kinases that play a vital role in stress signaling pathways that regulate cellular senescence and cell death. JNK activation has been found to be essential in modulating apoptotic signals and abnormal cell death in recent research [13]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that overexpression of CYP2E1 increases reactive oxygen species generation causes oxidative stress and leads to persistent stimulation of c-JNK signaling pathways, which leads to hepatocyte swelling and microvascular steatosis in people with NAFLD. As a result, reducing oxidative stress and liver damage in NAFLD patients by regulating CYP2E1 and c-Junk signaling could be a helpful treatment method [13].
The biological activity of the methanol extract of leaves of G. thunbergia has only been investigated in a few research papers. For the first time, the hepatoprotective effects of the methanol extract of leaves from G. thunbergia (GME) was investigated in mice with NAFLD caused by a high fructose diet. The goal of this investigation was to explore whether the oral administration of GME improved hepatic steatosis in HFD-induced obesity in mice, as well as to elucidate the possible underlying molecular mechanisms and the impact of G. thunbergia leaves’ methanol extract on NAFLD concerning the plasma lipidomic profile changes. In addition, the aim was to evaluate the potential mechanism of action of rutin isolated from the methanol extract of G. thunbergia leaves. The bioactive components were tentatively recognized from the leaf extract utilizing the (–ve) ion mode of LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis.

2. Results

2.1. LC–ESI–MS/MS Analysis of G. thunbergia Methanol Extract of Leaves (GME)

Chemical profiling of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves was tentatively recognized by liquid chromatography connected to tandem mass spectrometry of (–ve) ESI mode. Table 1 displays the existence of 48 known components of various chemical classes. The TIC is shown in Figure S3. From the Supplementary Materials, The LC–ESI–MS/MS showed different compounds of flavones, flavonols, flavanones, phenolic acids, coumaric acids and derivatives, hydroxycinnamic acids, and stilbene glycosides. In addition, flavonoids. Aglycones. and their glycosides. were recognized. The results are shown in Table 1. Structures of the recognized compounds are demonstrated in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.

2.2. Identification of Compounds’ Structures Isolated from G. thunbergia Methanol Extract of Leaves

Four compounds isolated from G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves were fully elucidated by their 1H- and 13C- NMR, APT, HMBC, HSQC, and EI-MS, ESI-MS spectra. Based on their spectra, compounds 1–4 were identified as Fucosterol, Stigmasterol, Ursolic acid, and Rutin. Their structures are drawn in Figure 4.

2.2.1. Spectroscopic Analysis

Compound (1):

Amorphous white solid (24 mg), 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), and APT-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) spectral data are displayed in the Supplementary Materials. EI-MS m/z: 412.18 [M]+. It was identified as fucosterol (stigmast-5,24-dien-3-ol) by analyzing the spectroscopic data and by comparison with the literature [40,41].

Compound (2):

Amorphous white solid (33 mg), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), and 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) spectral data are shown in the Supplementary Materials. EI-MS m/z: 412.98 [M]+. It was identified as stigmasterol by analyzing the spectroscopic data and by comparison with the literature [42].

Compound (3):

White amorphous powder (18 mg), 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO), and 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO) spectral data are found in the Supplementary Materials. EI-MS m/z = 456.85 [1]. It was identified as ursolic acid by analyzing the spectroscopic data and by comparison with the literature [43].

Compound (4):

Yellow crystals (412 mg), 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO), and 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO) spectral data are found in the Supplementary Materials. ESI-MS (negative mode) [M-H]− at m/z: 609.2. It was identified as rutin by analyzing the spectroscopic data and by comparison with the literature [44,45,46].

2.3. Effect of Rutin and Leaves Methanol Extract on Liver Index and Liver Function Tests of Mice

The presented data (Table 2) of the diseased group exhibited a remarkable increase in aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, and liver index, related to the control group (p < 0.05). Simvastatin significantly decreased the liver index and liver enzymes (p < 0.05) according to the diseased group. Rutin and methanolic extract of leaves displayed a remarkable decrease in ALT and AST serum levels at dose levels of rutin, 50 and 75 mg/kg, and methanol extract, 100 and 200 mg/kg (p < 0.05), related to the diseased group, while large doses of rutin, 100 mg/kg, and methanolic extract, 300 mg/kg, did not show significant changes according to the diseased group. The results revealed that rutin at 75 mg/kg might significantly decrease the liver index, ALT, and AST levels (p < 0.05) when related to the mice group administered simvastatin (10 mg/kg). Moreover, the mice group that received methanol extract at 200 mg/kg displayed a remarkable reduction in liver index related to the mice group managed with simvastatin.

2.3.1. Effect of Rutin and Leaves Methanol Extract on the Lipid Profile of Mice

Table 3 demonstrates that the diseased group had high serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein–cholesterol, while there was a noticeable decrease in the high-density lipoprotein–cholesterol of mice in the normal group (p < 0.05). The group administered simvastatin (10 mg/kg) exhibited a notable decrease in serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL–C and a notable increase in HDL–C in the diseased group (p < 0.05). Both rutin and methanolic extract at different doses exhibited considerable improvement in total cholesterol levels, compared to the diseased group. However, rutin at 75 mg/kg and GME at 200 mg/kg showed a reduction in triglyceride level in the diseased group (p < 0.05). As observed in Table 3, rutin at the dose of (50 and 100 mg/kg) and GME at (100 and 200 mg/kg) showed a notable reduction in LDL–C serum levels in the diseased group (p < 0.05). On the other hand, HDL–C significantly improved only at a dose of 75 mg/kg of rutin and also; improved at doses of 200 and 300 mg/kg of GME, compared to the diseased group (p < 0.05).
The present data revealed that rutin at the dose of 75 mg/kg significantly improved dyslipidemia caused by the consumption of a high fructose diet, compared to the diseased group. In comparison, rutin at 50 mg/kg did not show noteworthy changes in the lipid profile of mice when compared to the diseased group. Our data demonstrated a substantial improvement of NAFLD combined dyslipidemia at 200 mg/kg of GME. On the other hand, the dose of 100 mg/kg of this extract did not show notable changes in the diseased group.

2.3.2. Effect of Rutin and Methanolic Extract on Oxidative Stress-Related Gene Expression

The diseased group of mice showed a significant rise in the relative messenger ribonucleic acid expression of iNOS and CYP2E1 in the liver (p < 0.05) by qRT–PCR, compared to the normal control group (Figure 5A,B). It was observed that different doses of rutin and leaves methanolic extract exhibited a significant decrease in relative mRNA expression of both iNOS and CYP2E1 (p < 0.05), compared to the diseased group (Figure 5A,B). Interestingly, the mice group that was administered rutin at the dose of 75 mg/kg exhibited the most significant downregulation of CYP2E1 relative gene expression (decreased by 86%), relative to the diseased group. Administration of GME at 200 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg exhibited valuable downregulation in CYP2E1 relative gene expression (82% and 71%, respectively), relative to the diseased mice (Figure 5A,B).

2.3.3. Effect of Rutin and Total Leaves Extract on Apoptotic Kinase (c-JNK1) Gene Expression

Figure 5C displays a notable rise in the relative mRNA expression of hepatic JNK1 of mice in the diseased group (p < 0.05) relative to the normal control group. It was also observed that different doses of rutin and total methanolic leaves extract exhibited a significant decrease in relative mRNA expression of JNK1 (p < 0.05) compared to the diseased group (Figure 5C). Furthermore, the present work displayed that the mice group taking rutin at 75 mg/kg, and the mice group receiving total G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves at a dose of 200 mg/kg, exhibited the most significant downregulation of JNK1 relative gene expression (decrease by 93% and 80%, respectively) compared to the diseased mice (Figure 5C).

2.3.4. Histopathology of Liver in Different Mice Groups

The liver tissues of mice in the normal group displayed a regular-sized central vein surrounded by normal hepatocytes (Figure 6A). On the contrary, the liver tissues of mice in the diseased group showed marked inflammation around the central vein and hepatocytes with marked steatosis; also, some cells exhibited necrosis (Figure 6B). Liver sections of mice that received simvastatin (10 mg/kg) revealed mild inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with mild steatosis (Figure 6C). Liver tissues of the mice group that were administered rutin at 75 mg/kg displayed a portal tract surrounded by minimal inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with minimal steatosis and degeneration (Figure 7B), relative to the marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with moderate steatosis observed in the tissues from mice in the group administered rutin at 50 mg/kg (Figure 7A). Moreover, the liver tissues from mice in the group that received rutin at 100 mg/kg displayed a portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with moderate steatosis (Figure 7C).
The results also exhibited that the liver tissues of the mice administered GME at 200 mg/kg showed normal hepatocytes with no inflammation or steatosis (Figure 8B), when compared to the marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with mild steatosis observed in the liver tissues of mice that received GME at 100 mg/kg (Figure 8A). A mildly dilated congested central vein accompanied by mild steatosis was observed in the liver tissues of mice that received total leaves extract at 300 mg/kg (Figure 8C).

3. Discussion

The spread of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increasing cases of obesity, which loads the global health care system. Due to the extraordinary consumption of high-density foods, such as high-fat or high-sugar intake diets, organ damage raises the white adipose tissue, leading to health-threatening inflammatory alterations in humans, accompanied by metabolic and hormonal changes [5].
Nutraceuticals are active phytochemical components found in plants, such as flavonoids. They are employed as a combination therapy in up to 82 percent of affected persons with fatty liver, cancer, and other disorders. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds are essential active components among other active components [47]. The LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis of GME explored the tentative recognition of 48 known compounds contributing to various health benefits. Antioxidant properties are one of the most critical possible health benefits of phenolics (chlorogenic acid) and flavonoids, such as (rutin, hesperetin, naringenin, luteolin, kaempferol glycosides, and methoxylated flavones) [48,49].
Major metabolites, determined by LC–ESI–MS/MS, were rutin, isoquercitrin, delphinidin-3-O-(6″-O-α-rhamnopyranosyl-β-glucopyranoside), kaempferol-3-O-(6-P-coumaroyl)-glucoside, quinic acid, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside, 4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavonol, chlorogenic acid, hesperetin, acacetin, daphnetin, 3,4,5′-trihydroxy-3′-glucopyranosylstilbene, and 3,5,7-trihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavone.
The isolation of stigmasterol, fucosterol, ursolic acid, and rutin was performed from the unsaponifiable part of the petroleum ether fraction and n-butanol fraction of leaves extracts. Their structures were elucidated via spectroscopic analysis of these compounds and by comparison with the literature.
Compound (1) was separated as an amorphous white matter that exhibited a molecular ion [M]+ peak at m/z 412.18 (Supplementary Materials, Figure S5). The 1H-NMR spectrum is provided in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S6. It showed signals resonating at δ 3.29 (d, J = 8 Hz, 3H, H-29), 2.30 (d, J = 8 Hz, 3H, H-21), 2.07 (s, 3H, H-19), 1.22 (d, J = 12 Hz, 3H, H-27), 0.88 (d, J = 8 Hz, 3H, H-26) and 0.73 (s, 3H, H-18) for six methyl groups, suggesting that compound 1 had a sterol core. The distinctive multiplet signal resonating at δ 3.47 (1H, m, H-3) was assigned to an oxygenated methine proton. In addition, there was a signal at δ 3.67 (1H, m), attributed to the proton of C-25, which appeared as a multiplet. Moreover, two olefinic proton signals displayed multiplets at δ 4.60 (1H, m, H-6) and 4.15 (1H, m, H-28), respectively. The APT-NMR data (demonstrated in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S7) explored the existence of 29 carbons (6 CH3 groups, 10 CH2 groups, 9 CH groups, and four quaternary carbons), four of which were vinylic (C-5, C-6, C-24, C-28). The signals of the APT-NMR spectrum at δ 146.36 (C-24) and 140.32 (C-5) were ascribed to two olefinic quaternary carbons, whereas two methine olefinic carbons were displayed at δ 119.63 (C-6) and 117.52 (C-28). The signal noticed at δ 71.09 ppm was attributed to a C-atom connected to an oxygen atom, which could be assigned to C-3. Carbon signals at δ 36.49 (C-20), 35.08 (C-22), 25.04 (C-23), and 34.57 (C-25) were suggested to be sp3 carbons of the aliphatic chain. This compound was identified as fucosterol (stigmast-5,24-dien-3-ol) by comparing the results with the literature [40,41].
Compound (2) exhibited [M]+ = 412.98 (Supplementary Materials, Figure S8). The 1H-NMR spectrum, displayed in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S9, showed singlet signals at δ 0.67 (3H, s) and 1.00 (3H, s), which were assigned to the presence of two methyl groups at 18 and 19 positions; three methyl doublets resonating at δ 0.81 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 0.83 (3H, d, J = 6 Hz) 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz) were assigned to carbons 26, 27 and 21, respectively; and a methyl triplet at δ 0.88 (3H) at C-29. It also displayed signals resonating at δ 5.00 (2H, m), 5.14 (2H, m), and 5.35 (1H, m), suggesting the existence of three protons, according with those of a trisubstituted and a disubstituted olefinic bond at C-22, C-23, and C-6 respectively. The proton ascribed to the H-3 of a sterol moiety appeared as a multiplet signal at δ 3.51; this characteristic signal was assigned to an oxygenated methine proton. The 13C- NMR spectral data (demonstrated in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S10) reinforced the presence of 29 carbon signals, including six methyls and nine methylenes. The chemical shift at δ (C-3) 71.80 was due to oxymethine carbon, and signals at δ C 140.73 and δ C 121.72 were due to a double bond between C-5 and C-6, respectively. Carbon signals at δ C 138.32 (C-22) and δ C 129.24 (C-23) were ascribed to carbon in a trans-conformation of a triterpenoid nucleus. The structure was elucidated as stigmasterol, by analyzing the spectroscopic data in the literature [42,50].
The EI–MS spectrum of compound (3) had [M]+ at m/z 456.85. The 1H–NMR spectrum of the compound displayed the existence of seven methyl groups resonating at δ 0.71 (3H, s, H-25), 0.82 (3H, s, H-24), 1.00 (3H, s, H-26), 1.05 (3H, s, H-27), 1.19 (3H, s, H-23) and 0.76 (3H, d, J = 5.75 Hz, H-29), 0.86 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H-30) in the area of the higher field. which is common in an ursane-type triterpenes skeleton [50]. A down-field signal at δ 2.97 (1H, m) represented H-3, which was assigned to the methine proton on the carbon, which bore the hydroxyl group (its proton signal was displayed at δ 4.30), and an olefinic proton signal resonating at δ 5.09 (1H, s) ppm was assigned to H-12 of a triterpene. Finally, a doublet signal resonated at δ 2.46 (1H, d, J = 11.3 Hz) and was assigned to C-18. The 13C- NMR spectrum indicated that compound (3) had a total of 30 carbon atoms and showed the presence of signals characteristic to the triterpene group of α-amyrine: δC 77.44, 125.10, 138.70, and 178.91 ppm. The signal resonating at δ 77.44 ppm was ascribed to C-3 (CH–O–) of a triterpenoid and the signals at δ 125.10 and 138.70 ppm at position 12 and 13, respectively, were for the double bond of ursane type of triterpenes [28]. The signal resonating at δC 178.91 ppm was attributed to a carbon of a carbonyl group at position 28. It was identified as ursolic acid, according to the reported data in the literature [43]. Different spectra are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Figures S11–S13.
The ESI–MS spectrum of compound (4) in the negative ion mode was demonstrated [M-H]− at m/z 609.2. The 1H–NMR spectrum showed aliphatic signals assigned to the sugar part, as two hexoses were displayed at δ 5.35 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-glc-1, anomeric proton), 3.37 (m, H-glc-2), 3.73 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, H-glc-6), 4.39 (s, H-rha-1, anomeric proton), 3.37 (m, H-rha-2), 3.24 (m, H-rha-3), 3.37 (m, H-rha-4), 3.24 (m, H-rha-5), 1.01 (d, J = 6 Hz, H-rha-6). The doublet signal at δ 5.35 ppm (J = 6.8 Hz) was assigned to the anomeric proton and confirmed the β-configuration of glucose. The presence of a doublet signal resonating at δ 1.01 ppm with J = 6 Hz for the methyl group and a singlet signal resonating at δ 4.39 ppm for the acetal proton were attributed to rhamnose. The 1H–NMR spectrum showed meta-coupled doublets resonating at δ 6.20 (d, J = 2 Hz) and 6.40 (d, J = 1.2 Hz) ppm, each ascribed to 1 proton of H-6 and H-8, respectively. The 3′, 4′ dihydroxylation on ring B was detected by the presence of signals at δ 7.54 and 7.56 ppm, which were ascribed to H-2′, 6′. The notable signal was presented at δ 6.84 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), representing the proton of H-5′ on ring A. The 13C–NMR spectrum indicated that compound (4) had a total of 27 carbon atoms: carbon signals at δ 101.63 (C-glc-1), 74.52 (glc-2), 76.88 (glc-3), 68.71 (glc-4), 76.35 (glc-5), 67.45 (glc-6), confirmed the presence of glucose moiety, and carbon signals at δ101.21 (C-rha-1), 71.00 (rha-2), 70.44 (rha-3), 70.82 (rha-4), 72.28 (rha-5), 18.21 (rha-6), were attributed to the presence of rhamnose moiety. The up-field signal resonating at δ 18.21 ppm of (rha-6) was noticed with signals for the dihydroxy groups at 3`, 4` of ring B. Signals which were ascribed at δ 101.63 and 101.21 ppm, were attributed to acetal carbon of (C-glc-1) and (C-rha-1). A recognized down-field signal showed at δ 177.81 ppm for C-4. The spectrum also showed different down-field signals resonating at δ 164.65, 157.06, 161.66, and 156.88 ppm for C-7, 9, 5, and 2, respectively. Correlation between carbons and protons displayed the proton-carbon coupling with nearest carbon skeletons and was confirmed by the Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation spectrum, as shown in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S18. It was identified according to the reported data in the literature [44,45,46]. Different spectra were found in the Supplementary Materials, Figures S15–S17.
In the present work, induction of NAFLD, mediated by administration of HFD in drinking water, was confirmed by the significant increase in the liver index and elevated serum levels of AST, ALT, TG, TC, LDL-C, and the low concentration of HDL–C. Histopathological examination of mice from the disease control group showed marked inflammation around the central vein and hepatocytes with marked steatosis, confirming the induction of NAFLD, as previously described by Zhang et al. [51]. Furthermore, the significantly increased levels of triglyceride and total cholesterol in mice of the disease control group indicated fat deposition in the liver tissue.
Both rutin and methanol extract of leaves of Gardenia thunbergia showed notable improvement in the lipid profile of treated mice groups, compared to the diseased group. Interestingly, rutin at the dose of 75 mg/kg and GME at 200 mg/kg were the doses that displayed a significant decrease in triglyceride levels, compared to the diseased group. Rutin at (50 and 100 mg/kg) and GME at (100 and 200 mg/kg) showed a notable reduction in LDL–C serum levels, compared to the diseased group. HDL–C improved only at a dose of 75 mg/kg of rutin and 200 and 300 mg/kg of GME, compared to the diseased group.
These results indicated that administration of GME or pure rutin exhibited a decrease in fat accumulation in hepatocytes, resulting in the decreased inflammation and steatosis observed in liver sections of mice from the treated groups.
The reducing effect of GME on AST and ALT levels indicated that it might reduce the adverse effects of a high fructose diet on the liver and lessen hepatic injury, which agreed with Li et al. [49], who demonstrated that flavonoids had a positive effect on liver structure and function.
The inflammatory response plays an essential role in developing hepatic steatosis [52]. Accumulation of fatty acids could be handled by cytochrome (CYP2E1), a member of the oxidoreductase cytochrome family [53,54,55]. However, increased CYP2E1 expression contributes considerably to oxidative stress in NAFLD livers according to various studies, including human and mouse models of NAFLD [56,57,58]. In addition, CYP2E1 triggers hydroxylation of fatty acids, resulting in the accumulation of cytotoxic lipid intermediates and ROS and activating of cell death by activating the ERK1/2 pathway [56].
It was found that upregulation of CYP2E1 played a potential role in the activation of the death signaling c-Jun N-terminal kinases (cJNK) pathway [59,60,61]. Activation of cJNK would, consequently, phosphorylate and activate other proteins, such as Bax and Bcl-2, which would, finally, trigger mitochondrial apoptotic pathways and subsequent development and progression of NAFLD. Increased steatosis and fatty acid β-oxidation would stimulate reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress, leading to increased cJNK activity, and, subsequently, increased insulin resistance, provoking hepatocyte death [59,60,61].
These results indicated that flavonoids of G. thunbergia, especially rutin, could hinder the development and progression of NAFLD through the downregulation of CYP2E1, which, subsequently, inhibits the c-JNK apoptotic pathway. Histopathological examination of liver tissues of the mice groups administrated rutin (at the dose of 75 mg/kg) or GME (at the dose of 200 mg/kg) revealed the absence of inflammation and steatosis, which was considered as further evidence for the potential role of G. thunbergia in inhibiting NAFLD development. Our results were consistent with other studies that reported that TNF-α, FFAs, and ROS activated JNK and promoted initiation and progression of insulin resistance and the development of NAFLD [62,63].
GME and rutin also reduced iNOS expression levels. Free-radical scavenging activity of GME polyphenolics could decrease ROS and prevent inflammatory reactions. These results were consistent with Li et al. [49], who reported that the downregulation of iNOS inhibited the development of insulin resistance in mice fed HFD.
Further assessment of liver tissues of mice given GME (200 mg/kg) displayed a portal tract surrounded by average-sized cords of hepatocytes with no inflammation or steatosis. Mice treated with rutin (75 mg/kg) showed a portal tract surrounded by minimal inflammatory cellular infiltrate and hepatocytes with minimal steatosis and degeneration.
GME (300 mg/kg) showed a dilated congested central vein tract (red arrow) with no inflammation and hepatocytes with mild steatosis. Mice treated with rutin (100 mg/kg) revealed marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate surrounded by hepatocytes with mild steatosis and a congested central vein tract, compared to normal hepatocytes, and the absence of steatosis or inflammation was observed in mice given rutin at the dose of (75 mg/kg) or GME (200 mg/kg).
Administration of G. thunbergia extract of leaves at a dose of (200 mg/kg) and rutin (75 mg/kg) could prevent the development of NAFLD in HFD-fed mice through decreasing the oxidative stress mediated by β-oxidation of fatty acids, and decreasing inflammatory steatosis development through downregulation of the CYP2E1–cJNK apoptotic signaling pathway.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves were obtained from the shrubs growing in Al Sadat City, Egypt, in March, 2018. Professor Dr. Ibrahim Abd El Rahim Mashaly, Professor of Plant Ecology and Flora, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, certified the plant’s legitimacy. The leaves were air-dried and then ground before use for this study. The voucher specimen (PG00415-M) was kept at the Herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University.

Extraction and Isolation Procedure

Gardenia thunbergia leaves were dried at room temperature and ground to obtain 1.5 kg dry powder. They were extracted by cold maceration with methanol (3 × 3 L, 48 h each) till exhaustion and then evaporated using a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at 40 °C to provide a dry leaves methanol extract of (220 g) yield. A part of the methanol extract (175 g) was resuspended in methanol and successively partitioned with petroleum ether 60–80, methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol. The yield of each fraction was petroleum ether (45 g), methylene chloride (40.1 g), ethyl acetate (4.6 g), and n-butanol (55.6), represented in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S1.
The petroleum ether fraction obtained from the methanolic extract of the leaves was used to investigate the saponifiable and unsaponifiable matter. Two grams of petroleum ether extract of the methanol extract of the leaves was saponified by heating for 6 h using a boiling water bath with a reflux condenser, accompanied by 30 mL alcoholic KOH (10%). To eliminate the majority of the alcohol, the saponified liquid was distilled, then the aqueous liquid was diluted with 20 mL water before being extracted with ether till exhaustion. The combined ethereal extracts were washed with distilled water, dehydrated over anhydrous Na2SO4, and distilled under a vacuum to yield the unsaponifiable matter (USM) of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves, represented in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S2. The unsaponifiable matter of the petroleum ether fraction (1 g) was applied to a silica gel column (40 g, φ two × 30 cm, fraction collected 30 mL), using the wet method. The mobile phase was composed of gradient mixtures with increasing polarities of petroleum ether—CH2Cl2, then methylene chloride: methanol mixtures of increasing polarities. The petroleum ether—CH2Cl2 (98:2) afforded compound (1) (24 mg). The petroleum ether—CH2Cl2 (30:70) eluate (100 mg) was applied to another CC, using silica gel (6 g, φ one × 6 cm, fraction collected 10 mL), using a mobile phase of increasing polarity (gradient elution) of n-Hexane—EtOAc. The n-Hexane—EtOAc (10:90) afforded compound (2) (33 mg). The first column afforded eluate (82 mg) by methylene chloride—methanol (98:2) was applied to another CC using silica gel (6 g, φ 1 × 6 cm, fraction collected 10 mL). Elution was done successively with a mixture of increasing polarities of CH2Cl2—MeOH to give compound (3) (18 mg) at (93:7), displayed in Figure S4 of the Supplementary Materials.
The n-butanol fraction (55.6 g) was mixed with deionized water and the suspension was passed through a Diaion HP-20 column [60 × 3 cm, 80 g]. The mobile phase was composed of deionized water (1 L), followed by MeOH-H2O (50:50) and 100% MeOH. Next, the n-butanol fraction, eluted with 100% MeOH (5.5 g), was applied to a column of silica gel (200 g, φ 4.5 × 40 cm, fractions of 50 mL each) using the dry method and eluted, consecutively, with a mixture of increasing polarities of CH2Cl2—MeOH containing 5% water. A yellow matter was obtained from the CH2Cl2—MeOH containing 5% water (70:30) eluate (435 mg). This matter was applied to Sephadex LH-20 for purification to obtain a compound (4) (412 mg), represented in the Supplementary Materials, Figure S14.

4.2. LC–ESI–MS/MS for Metabolite Analysis

4.2.1. Sample Preparation

The sample was prepared by mixing the powder from Gardenia thunbergia leaves with light petroleum ether. The extraction of the active constituents of the powder with MeOH was done after exhaustion with petroleum ether; then, the extract was concentrated under a vacuum at 40 ◦C. The dried matter (50 mg) was then subjected to the procedure previously adopted, mentioned in the literature [64], before analysis. In addition, the LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis method was mentioned in the literature [64].

4.2.2. Acquisition Method and Analytical Parameters

Actives in the extract were identified by the Proteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Children’s Cancer Hospital (57357), Basic Research Department, Cairo, Egypt. The methods used were adopted from previously reported literature [65,66,67].

4.3. Experimental Animals

Male Albino mice, five-week-old, weight 20 g, were bought from the animal house of Giza Institute of Ophthalmology, Cairo, Egypt. The animals were retained at 25 ± 2 °C in a 12 h light-dark cycle. All mice were permitted to eat and drink freely.

4.3.1. Method of Assessment of the Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

After the acclimatization period (1 week), mice were separated into nine groups randomly (6 mice for each group). Then, they were treated with different drugs as follows:
Group 1: Normal control (NC): administered the diet and water freely for eight weeks.
Group 2: Diseased group (DG): administered 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline orally along with the diet and fructose in drinking water.
Group 3: Simvastatin (HFD/Simvastatin): administered simvastatin (10 mg/kg) by oral gavages.
Group 4: Rutin 50 mg/kg (HFD/LDR): orally administered rutin (50 mg/kg) through oral gavages.
Group 5: Rutin 75 mg/kg (HFD/MDR): orally administered rutin (75 mg/kg) through oral gavages.
Group 6: Rutin 100 mg/kg (HFD/HDR): orally administered rutin (100 mg/kg) through oral gavages.
Group 7: Total leave extract 100 mg/kg (HFD/LDGME): administered total leave extract (100 mg/kg) by oral gavages.
Group 8: Total leave extract 200 mg/kg (HFD/MDGME): administered total leave extract (200 mg/kg) by oral gavages.
Group 9: Total leave extract 300 mg/kg (HFD/HDGME): administered total leave extract (300 mg/kg) by oral gavages.
The induction of NAFLD in mice was performed using 30% fructose in drinking water [68]. All groups were administered the diet and solution of fructose (30%) in drinking water free from the 2nd–8th week. The dose of simvastatin was administered twice weekly for seven weeks. In addition, groups 4–6 were administered the doses of rutin twice weekly. Also, groups (7–9) were administered the doses of methanol extracts twice weekly. Food and drinking water intake were monitored weekly.
HFD: high-fructose diet, LDR: Low dose rutin, MDR: Moderate dose rutin, HDR: High dose rutin, LDGME: low dose gardenia methanol extract, MDGME: Moderate dose gardenia methanol extract, HDGME: high dose gardenia methanol extract.

4.3.2. Determination of Liver Index and Liver Function Tests

Fresh liver samples were dissected after the scarification of mice. The determination of liver index, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in serum samples [69] were performed using colorimetric kits purchased from Spectrum-diagnostics®, Cairo, Egypt.

4.3.3. Determination of Lipid Profile in the Serum

At the end of the experiment (8 weeks), mice were kept for overnight fasting. Then, mice of all groups were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and aliquots of mice serum samples were collected and stored at ࢤ20 °C for biochemical analysis. Kits for determining serum biomarkers of lipid profile, adopting manufacturer protocol [70,71], were purchased from Bio-diagnostic®, Cairo, Egypt.

4.3.4. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) for Liver Tissue

The liver tissue samples of mice were homogenized to determine iNOS, CYP2E1, and c-JNK1 relative gene expression. A total RNA extraction kit (Bio E-Technology, Xi’an, China) was used to extract total RNA from the liver tissue of mice; purity and concentration of mRNA were estimated. The extracted mRNA was used to form cDNA. Primer sequences were mentioned in the Supplementary Materials. Each sample was analyzed by the qRT-PCR, normalized to the reference gene level (GAPDH) level, and expressed as a relative copy number (RCN). Threshold cycle (Ct) values were calculated, and the transcript levels were calculated by using 2−ΔCt formula [68].

4.3.5. Histopathological Examination of Liver Tissue

Liver tissue was cut into five μm sections, which were kept in paraffin, hematoxylin, and eosin were used in staining. A professional histopathologist examined these sections with a light microscope (Leica DM 500, Switzerland). The liver sections were investigated for inflammatory cell infiltration, necrosis, and the areas scored steatosis [72].

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 20. One-Way ANOVA test was done for one-independent variables. The least significant difference (LSD) test is used in the analysis of variance for multiple comparisons in studying liver index, liver function tests, and the lipid profile of mice. Data displayed as mean ± SD, n = 6 per group. Statistically, a significant difference was determined in the qRT-PCR experiment by a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data was significant at p-value < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study indicated that G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves and rutin isolated from this plant had a distinguishable effect in reducing lipid serum levels. Fucosterol, ursolic acid, rutin, and stigmasterol were isolated from the leaves. The first three actives were separated for the first time from this species. Different compounds (48) from several phytochemical classes were tentatively identified using LC–ESI–MS/MS to explore the chemical composition of this plant. The presence of the major metabolites of rutin, isoquercitrin, delphinidin rhamnoglucoside, kaempferol glycosides, quinic acid, 4′,5,7-trihydroxyflavonol, chlorogenic acid, hesperetin, acacetin, daphnetin, 3,4,5′-trihydroxy-3′-glucopyranosylstilbene, and 3,5,7-trihydroxy-4′-methoxyflavone with anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties, could explain the therapeutic effects of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves in the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). G. thunbergia extract and rutin could hinder the development of NAFLD by reducing oxidative stress and triggering the downregulation of CYP2E1 and c-JNK cell death pathway. Therefore, G. thunbergia extract and rutin could be potential therapeutic options for treating NAFLD. However, further clinical studies are required to assess potentially toxic and effective doses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28020879/s1, Figure S1: Extraction and fractionation of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves; Figure S2: Investigation of petroleum ether extract of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves; Figure S3: The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves (negative mode); Figure S4: Investigation of the unsaponifiable matter (USM) of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves; Figure S5: EI-MS spectrum of fucosterol; Figure S6: 1H-NMR spectrum of fucosterol (CDCl3, 400 MHz); Figure S7: APT spectrum of fucosterol (CDCl3, 100 MHz); Figure S8: EI-MS spectrum of stigmasterol; Figure S9: 1H-NMR spectrum of stigmasterol (CDCl3, 500 MHz); Figure S10: 13C-NMR spectrum of stigmasterol (CDCl3, 125 MHz); Figure S11: EI-MS spectrum of ursolic acid; Figure S12: 1H-NMR spectrum of ursolic acid (DMSO, 500 MHz); Figure S13: 13C-NMR spectrum of ursolic acid (DMSO, 125 MHz); Figure S14: Investigation of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves n-Butanol fraction; Figure S15: ESI-MS (negative mode) spectrum of rutin; Figure S16: 1H-NMR spectrum of rutin (DMSO, 400 MHz); Figure S17: 13C-NMR spectrum of rutin (DMSO, 100 MHz); Figure S18: HMBC spectrum of rutin (DMSO).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., M.E.-A. and S.A.E.-S.; methodology, E.M.E.-S., A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; validation, A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; formal analysis, A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; investigation, E.M.E.-S., A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; resources, A.K., M.E.-A. and S.A.E.-S.; data curation, A.K., M.E.-A. and S.A.E.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.E.-S., A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; writing—review and editing, E.M.E.-S., A.K., M.E.-A., S.A.E.-S. and O.A.E.-F.; visualization, E.M.E.-S., A.K., M.E.-A. and S.A.E.-S.; supervision, A.K., M.E.-A. and S.A.E.-S.; project administration A.K.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal care and experiments were performed following the approval of the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy (Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt), with approval number TP/RE/08/22M-0036.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting results were included in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Yao, H.; Qiao, Y.-J.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Tao, X.-F.; Xu, L.-N.; Yin, L.-H.; Qi, Y.; Peng, J.-Y. Herbal medicines and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nower, A.A.; Hamza, E.M. Production of Gardenia jasminoides scions via tissue culture for grafting on Gardenia thunbergia under greenhouse conditions. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2013, 9, 3118–3128. [Google Scholar]
  3. Debnath, T.; Park, P.-J.; Nath, N.C.D.; Samad, N.B.; Park, H.W.; Lim, B.O. Antioxidant activity of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis fruit extracts. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yin, F.; Liu, J.-h. Research and application progress of Gardenia jasminoides. Chin. Herb. Med. 2018, 10, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tung, Y.-T.; Zeng, J.-L.; Ho, S.-T.; Xu, J.-W.; Li, S.; Wu, J.-H. Anti-NAFLD effect of Djulis hull and its major compound, rutin, in mice with high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Attallah, N.G.; El-Sherbeni, S.A.; El-Kadem, A.H.; Elekhnawy, E.; El-Masry, T.A.; Elmongy, E.I.; Altwaijry, N.; Negm, W.A. Elucidation of the Metabolite Profile of Yucca gigantea and Assessment of its Cytotoxic, Antimicrobial, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hashem, A.; Shastri, Y.; Al Otaibi, M.; Buchel, E.; Saleh, H.; Ahmad, R.; Ahmed, H.; Al Idris, F.; Ahmed, S.; Guda, M. Expert opinion on the management of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the Middle east with a focus on the use of silymarin. Gastroenterol. Insights 2021, 12, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Zheng, D.; Zhao, A.; Huang, F.; Kuang, J.; Ren, Z.; Chen, T.; Lei, J.; Lin, J.; Wang, X. Theabrownin and Poria cocos polysaccharide improve lipid metabolism via modulation of bile acid and fatty acid metabolism. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ratziu, V. Non-pharmacological interventions in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Liver Int. 2017, 37, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, Z.; Tian, R.; She, Z.; Cai, J.; Li, H. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 152, 116–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pasarín, M.; Abraldes, J.G.; Liguori, E.; Kok, B.; La Mura, V. Intrahepatic vascular changes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Potential role of insulin-resistance and endothelial dysfunction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 6777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harjumäki, R.; Pridgeon, C.S.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M. CYP2E1 in alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver injury. Roles of ROS, reactive intermediates and lipid overload. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. de Carvalho Tavares, I.M.; Lago-Vanzela, E.S.; Rebello, L.P.G.; Ramos, A.M.; Gomez-Alonso, S.; Garcia-Romero, E.; Da-Silva, R.; Hermosin-Gutierrez, I. Comprehensive study of the phenolic composition of the edible parts of jambolan fruit (Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels). Food Res. Int. 2016, 82, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lin, Y.; Wu, B.; Li, Z.; Hong, T.; Chen, M.; Tan, Y.; Jiang, J.; Huang, C. Metabolite identification of myricetin in rats using HPLC coupled with ESI-MS. Chromatographia 2012, 75, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Slimestad, R.; Hostettmann, K. Characterisation of phenolic constituents from juvenile and mature needles of Norway spruce by means of high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Phytochem. Anal. 1996, 7, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, N.; Yu, S.; Prior, R.L. LC/MS/MS characterization of phenolic constituents in dried plums. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3579–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gang, S.; Sharma, S.; Saraf, M.; Buck, M.; Schumacher, J. Analysis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in Klebsiella by LC-MS/MS and the Salkowski method. Bio-Protocol 2019, 9, e3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, J.; Jia, Q.; Huang, X.; Yao, G.; Ma, W.; Zhang, H.; Ouyang, H.; He, J. Development of a HPLC-MS/MS method to determine the 13 elements of semen cuscutae and application to a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Nuzul, M.I.; Jong, V.Y.M.; Koo, L.F.; Chan, T.H.; Ang, C.H.; Idris, J.; Husen, R.; Wong, S.W. Effects of Extraction Methods on Phenolic Content in the Young Bamboo Culm Extracts of Bambusa beecheyana Munro. Molecules 2022, 27, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ben Salem, M.; Ksouda, K.; Dhouibi, R.; Charfi, S.; Turki, M.; Hammami, S.; Ayedi, F.; Sahnoun, Z.; Zeghal, K.M.; Affes, H. LC-MS/MS analysis and hepatoprotective activity of artichoke (Cynara Scolymus L.) leaves extract against high fat diet-induced obesity in rats. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. El Sayed, A.M.; Basam, S.M.; Marzouk, H.S.; El-Hawary, S. LC–MS/MS and GC–MS profiling as well as the antimicrobial effect of leaves of selected Yucca species introduced to Egypt. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Yu, H.; Wu, H.; Pan, Y.; Wang, K.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, C. Characterization and quantification by LC-MS/MS of the chemical components of the heating products of the flavonoids extract in pollen typhae for transformation rule exploration. Molecules 2015, 20, 18352–18366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Robotham, S.A.; Brodbelt, J.S. Identification of Flavone Glucuronide Isomers by Metal Complexation and Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Regioselectivity of Uridine 5′-Diphosphate–Glucuronosyltransferase Isozymes in the Biotransformation of Flavones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Torskangerpoll, K.; Nørbæk, R.; Nodland, E.; Øvstedal, D.O.; Andersen, Ø.M. Anthocyanin content of Tulipa species and cultivars and its impact on tepal colours. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.; Yang, C.; Wu, Z.; Pei, J.; Chen, Y.; Huang, X.; Gao, S.; Kan, R.; Zhang, W.; Xie, S. Gardenia jasminoides Ellis Fruit Extracts Attenuated Colitis in 2, 4, 6-Trinitrobenzenesulfonic Acid-Induced Rats. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alotaibi, B.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; El-Masry, T.A.; Elharty, M.E.; Saleh, A.; Abdelkader, D.H.; Mokhtar, F.A. Antibacterial activity of nano zinc oxide green-synthesised from Gardenia thailandica triveng. Leaves against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates: In vitro and in vivo study. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2022, 50, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Elmongy, E.I.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; El-Masry, T.A.; Attallah, N.G.; Altwaijry, N.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; El-Sherbeni, S.A. Antidiarrheal and antibacterial activities of Monterey cypress phytochemicals: In vivo and in vitro approach. Molecules 2022, 27, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brito, A.; Ramirez, J.E.; Areche, C.; Sepúlveda, B.; Simirgiotis, M.J. HPLC-UV-MS profiles of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of fruits from three citrus species consumed in Northern Chile. Molecules 2014, 19, 17400–17421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Parejo, I.; Jauregui, O.; Sánchez-Rabaneda, F.; Viladomat, F.; Bastida, J.; Codina, C. Separation and characterization of phenolic compounds in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) using liquid chromatography− negative electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3679–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hanganu, D.; Vlase, L.; Olah, N. LC/MS analysis of isoflavones from Fabaceae species extracts. Farmacia 2010, 58, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahrous, F.S.M.; Mohammed, H.; Sabour, R. LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS of Holoptelea integrifolia (Roxb.) Planch. leaves and In silico study of phenolic compounds’ antiviral activity against the HSV1 virus. Azhar Int. J. Pharm. Med Sci. 2021, 1, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beesk, N.; Perner, H.; Schwarz, D.; George, E.; Kroh, L.W.; Rohn, S. Distribution of quercetin-3, 4′-O-diglucoside, quercetin-4′-O-monoglucoside, and quercetin in different parts of the onion bulb (Allium cepa L.) influenced by genotype. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cappiello, A.; Famiglini, G.; Mangani, F.; Tirillini, B. Analysis of coumarins by micro high-performance liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry with a particle beam interface. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Osakabe, K.; Tsao, C.C.; Li, L.; Popko, J.L.; Umezawa, T.; Carraway, D.T.; Smeltzer, R.H.; Joshi, C.P.; Chiang, V.L. Coniferyl aldehyde 5-hydroxylation and methylation direct syringyl lignin biosynthesis in angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96, 8955–8960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Carlsen, S.C.; Mortensen, A.G.; Oleszek, W.; Piacente, S.; Stochmal, A.; Fomsgaard, I.S. Variation in flavonoids in leaves, stems and flowers of white clover cultivars. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2008, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Tabibiazar, M.; Amarowicz, R. A comprehensive review on the chemical constituents and functional uses of walnut (Juglans spp.) husk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Krishnaveni, M.; Dhanalakshmi, R.; Nandhini, N. GC-MS analysis of phytochemicals, fatty acid profile, antimicrobial activity of Gossypium seeds. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 27, 273–276. [Google Scholar]
  38. Saravanakumar, K.; Park, S.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Kim, K.-N.; Cho, S.-H.; Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Wang, M.-H. Metabolite profiling of methanolic extract of Gardenia jaminoides by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS and its anti-diabetic, and anti-oxidant activities. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chang, C.-S.; Yeh, T.S. Detection of 10 sweeteners in various foods by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jung, H.A.; Jung, H.J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Kwon, H.J.; Kim, M.-S.; Choi, J.S. Anti-adipogenic activity of the edible brown alga Ecklonia stolonifera and its constituent fucosterol in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2014, 37, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arora, M.; Kalia, A. Isolation and characterization of stigmasterol and β-sitosterol-D-glycoside from ethanolic extract of the stems of Salvadora persica linn. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 5, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  42. El-shiekh, R.A.; Al-Mahdy, D.A.; Hifnawy, M.S.; Tzanova, T.; Evain-Bana, E.; Philippot, S.; Bagrel, D.; Abdelsattar, E.A. Chemical and biological investigation of Ochrosia elliptica Labill. cultivated in Egypt. Rec. Nat. Prod 2017, 11, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tshilanda, D.D.; Onyamboko, D.N.; Babady-Bila, P.; Ngbolua, K.-t.-N.; Tshibangu, D.S.; Mpiana, P.T. Anti-sickling activity of ursolic acid isolated from the leaves of Ocimum gratissimum L.(Lamiaceae). Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2015, 5, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Feng, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.B.; Jung, J.S.; Lim, S.S.; Suh, H.W. Antinociceptive effect of single components isolated from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. Extract. Sci. Pharm. 2019, 87, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Srinivasan, R.; Natarajan, D.; Shivakumar, M.S. Antioxidant Compound Quercetin-3-O-α-L-rhamnoside (1→ 6)-β-D-glucose (Rutin) isolated from ethyl acetate leaf extracts of Memecylon edule Roxb (Melastamataceae). Free. Radic. Antioxid. 2015, 5, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. de Oliveira, D.M.; Siqueira, E.P.; Nunes, Y.R.; Cota, B.B. Flavonoids from leaves of Mauritia flexuosa. Rev. Bras. De Farmacogn. 2013, 23, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nwanodi, O. Nutraceuticals: Curative integrative cancer treatment. Altern. Integr. Med. 2017, 6, 1000240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fabbrini, M.; D’Amico, F.; Barone, M.; Conti, G.; Mengoli, M.; Brigidi, P.; Turroni, S. Polyphenol and tannin nutraceuticals and their metabolites: How the human gut microbiota influences their properties. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, P.; Yang, F.; Wang, X.; Zheng, W.; Sun, W. Hesperetin ameliorates hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation via the PI3K/AKT-Nrf2-ARE pathway in oleic acid-induced HepG2 cells and a rat model of high-fat diet-induced NAFLD. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3898–3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sang, S.; Lapsley, K.; Rosen, R.T.; Ho, C.-T. New prenylated benzoic acid and other constituents from almond hulls (Prunus amygdalus Batsch). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Y.; Geng, C.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Gao, M.; Liu, X.; Fang, F.; Chang, Y. Celastrol ameliorates liver metabolic damage caused by a high-fat diet through Sirt1. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Aubert, J.; Begriche, K.; Knockaert, L.; Robin, M.-A.; Fromenty, B. Increased expression of cytochrome P450 2E1 in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Mechanisms and pathophysiological role. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2011, 35, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Caro, A.A.; Cederbaum, A.I. Oxidative stress, toxicology, and pharmacology of CYP2E1. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Song, B.; Cederbaum, A.I. Ethanol-inducible cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1): Biochemistry, molecular biology and clinical relevance: 1996 update. Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 1996, 20, 138a–146a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Aljomah, G.; Baker, S.S.; Liu, W.; Kozielski, R.; Oluwole, J.; Lupu, B.; Baker, R.D.; Zhu, L. Induction of CYP2E1 in non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2015, 99, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Leung, T.-M.; Nieto, N. CYP2E1 and oxidant stress in alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Rolo, A.P.; Teodoro, J.S.; Palmeira, C.M. Role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 52, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abdelmegeed, M.A.; Banerjee, A.; Yoo, S.-H.; Jang, S.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Song, B.-J. Critical role of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) in the development of high fat-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 2012, 57, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Schattenberg, J.M.; Singh, R.; Wang, Y.; Lefkowitch, J.H.; Rigoli, R.M.; Scherer, P.E.; Czaja, M.J. JNK1 but not JNK2 promotes the development of steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology 2006, 43, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Singh, R.; Wang, Y.; Schattenberg, J.M.; Xiang, Y.; Czaja, M.J. Chronic oxidative stress sensitizes hepatocytes to death from 4-hydroxynonenal by JNK/c-Jun overactivation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 297, G907–G917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Iyer, S.; Upadhyay, P.K.; Majumdar, S.S.; Nagarajan, P. Animal models correlating immune cells for the development of NAFLD/NASH. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2015, 5, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Cicuéndez, B.; Ruiz-Garrido, I.; Mora, A.; Sabio, G. Stress kinases in the development of liver steatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Metab. 2021, 50, 101190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sakurai, Y.; Kubota, N.; Yamauchi, T.; Kadowaki, T. Role of insulin resistance in MAFLD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Attallah, N.G.; Negm, W.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; Elmongy, E.I.; Altwaijry, N.; El-Haroun, H.; El-Masry, T.A.; El-Sherbeni, S.A. Elucidation of phytochemical content of Cupressus macrocarpa leaves: In vitro and in vivo antibacterial effect against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hegazy, M.M.; Metwaly, A.M.; Mostafa, A.E.; Radwan, M.M.; Mehany, A.B.M.; Ahmed, E.; Enany, S.; Magdeldin, S.; Afifi, W.M.; ElSohly, M.A. Biological and chemical evaluation of some African plants belonging to Kalanchoe species: Antitrypanosomal, cytotoxic, antitopoisomerase I activities and chemical profiling using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2021, 17, 6. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohammed, H.A.; Khan, R.A.; Abdel-Hafez, A.A.; Abdel-Aziz, M.; Ahmed, E.; Enany, S.; Mahgoub, S.; Al-Rugaie, O.; Alsharidah, M.; Aly, M.S. Phytochemical profiling, in vitro and in silico anti-microbial and anti-cancer activity evaluations and Staph GyraseB and h-TOP-IIβ receptor-docking studies of major constituents of Zygophyllum coccineum L. Aqueous-ethanolic extract and its subsequent fractions: An approach to validate traditional phytomedicinal knowledge. Molecules 2021, 26, 577. [Google Scholar]
  67. Tsugawa, H.; Cajka, T.; Kind, T.; Ma, Y.; Higgins, B.; Ikeda, K.; Kanazawa, M.; VanderGheynst, J.; Fiehn, O.; Arita, M. MS-DIAL: Data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fathy, M.; Khalifa, E.M.; Fawzy, M.A. Modulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway by eugenol and telmisartan in carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in rats. Life Sci. 2019, 216, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Saadat, S.; Mardaneh, J.; Ahouran, M.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Ardebili, A.; Yousefi, M. Diagnosis of cattle brucellosis by PCR and serological methods: Comparison of diagnostic tests. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2017, 14, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ni, X.; Wang, H. Silymarin attenuated hepatic steatosis through regulation of lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in a mouse model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 1073. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Pai, S.A.; Munshi, R.P.; Panchal, F.H.; Gaur, I.-S.; Mestry, S.N.; Gursahani, M.S.; Juvekar, A.R. Plumbagin reduces obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease induced by fructose in rats through regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 28 00879 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of flavones, flavones glycosides, flavonols, and flavonols glycosides (Glu = glucoside, Gal = galactoside, Rha = rhamnose, Ara = arabinose, Xyl = xylose, Neo = neohesperidoside, Rut = rutinoside).
Figure 1. Structures of flavones, flavones glycosides, flavonols, and flavonols glycosides (Glu = glucoside, Gal = galactoside, Rha = rhamnose, Ara = arabinose, Xyl = xylose, Neo = neohesperidoside, Rut = rutinoside).
Molecules 28 00879 g001
Molecules 28 00879 g002 550
Figure 2. Structures of flavanones and their glycosides.
Figure 2. Structures of flavanones and their glycosides.
Molecules 28 00879 g002
Molecules 28 00879 g003 550
Figure 3. Some compounds identified tentatively of G. thunbergia leaves methanol extract by LC-ESI-MS/MS.
Figure 3. Some compounds identified tentatively of G. thunbergia leaves methanol extract by LC-ESI-MS/MS.
Molecules 28 00879 g003
Molecules 28 00879 g004 550
Figure 4. Structures of the isolated compounds from G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves, (1) Fucosterol, (2) Stigmasterol, (3) Ursolic acid, and (4) Rutin.
Figure 4. Structures of the isolated compounds from G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves, (1) Fucosterol, (2) Stigmasterol, (3) Ursolic acid, and (4) Rutin.
Molecules 28 00879 g004
Molecules 28 00879 g005 550
Figure 5. The impact of rutin and total methanolic extract at different doses on relative gene expression qRT–PCR as follows: (A); iNOS. (B); CYP2E. (C); JNK1. Data displayed as mean ± SD, n = 6 per group. Statistically, a significant difference resulted from a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data was significant at p-value < 0.05. *: significant according to the normal control group. #: significant according to the diseased group. GME: G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves. Control: normal control group. Diseased: diseased group.
Figure 5. The impact of rutin and total methanolic extract at different doses on relative gene expression qRT–PCR as follows: (A); iNOS. (B); CYP2E. (C); JNK1. Data displayed as mean ± SD, n = 6 per group. Statistically, a significant difference resulted from a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data was significant at p-value < 0.05. *: significant according to the normal control group. #: significant according to the diseased group. GME: G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves. Control: normal control group. Diseased: diseased group.
Molecules 28 00879 g005
Molecules 28 00879 g006 550
Figure 6. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); normal control group: displayed portal tract formed of the portal venule, portal arteriole, and bile ductile (red arrows), normal sized central veins (blue arrows) surrounded by normal sized cords of hepatocytes (black arrows). (B); diseased group: showed central veins (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with marked steatosis (blue arrows) and marked inflammation, while other cells showed individual cell necrosis. (C); simvastatin mice group: liver sections of mice received simvastatin (10 mg/kg) showed portal tract surrounded by mild inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrow) and hepatocytes with mild steatosis (blue arrow).
Figure 6. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); normal control group: displayed portal tract formed of the portal venule, portal arteriole, and bile ductile (red arrows), normal sized central veins (blue arrows) surrounded by normal sized cords of hepatocytes (black arrows). (B); diseased group: showed central veins (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with marked steatosis (blue arrows) and marked inflammation, while other cells showed individual cell necrosis. (C); simvastatin mice group: liver sections of mice received simvastatin (10 mg/kg) showed portal tract surrounded by mild inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrow) and hepatocytes with mild steatosis (blue arrow).
Molecules 28 00879 g006
Molecules 28 00879 g007 550
Figure 7. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups that received different doses of rutin (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); mice group that administered rutin at 50 mg/kg: displayed portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) and hepatocytes with moderate steatosis (blue arrow). (B); mice group received rutin at 75 mg/kg: section of the liver showing portal tract surrounded by minimal inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrow) and hepatocytes with minimal steatosis and degeneration (blue arrows). (C); mice group that received rutin at 100 mg/kg: showed a portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with moderate steatosis (blue arrow).
Figure 7. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups that received different doses of rutin (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); mice group that administered rutin at 50 mg/kg: displayed portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) and hepatocytes with moderate steatosis (blue arrow). (B); mice group received rutin at 75 mg/kg: section of the liver showing portal tract surrounded by minimal inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrow) and hepatocytes with minimal steatosis and degeneration (blue arrows). (C); mice group that received rutin at 100 mg/kg: showed a portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with moderate steatosis (blue arrow).
Molecules 28 00879 g007
Molecules 28 00879 g008 550
Figure 8. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups that received different doses of total G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); mice group received GME at 100 mg/kg: section of the liver displayed portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with mild steatosis (blue arrow). (B); mice group received GME at 200 mg/kg: A section of the liver showed a portal tract (red arrow) surrounded by average-sized cords of hepatocytes (blue arrows) with no inflammation or steatosis. (C); mice group received GME at 300 mg/kg; showed dilated congested central vein tract (red arrow) with no inflammation and hepatocytes with mild steatosis.
Figure 8. Representative photomicrograph of a liver section of mice groups that received different doses of total G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves (H&E, ×200) as follows: (A); mice group received GME at 100 mg/kg: section of the liver displayed portal tract surrounded by marked inflammatory cellular infiltrate (red arrows) surrounded by hepatocytes with mild steatosis (blue arrow). (B); mice group received GME at 200 mg/kg: A section of the liver showed a portal tract (red arrow) surrounded by average-sized cords of hepatocytes (blue arrows) with no inflammation or steatosis. (C); mice group received GME at 300 mg/kg; showed dilated congested central vein tract (red arrow) with no inflammation and hepatocytes with mild steatosis.
Molecules 28 00879 g008
Table
Table 1. Phytochemical profiling of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves by LC–ESI–MS/MS in negative ion mode.
Table 1. Phytochemical profiling of G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves by LC–ESI–MS/MS in negative ion mode.
No.Rt (min.)[M − H]¯
m/z		Error PPMMatching ScoreMS2
m/z		FormulaIdentificationRef
11.05178.9699.176.1179.054, 161.043C9H8O4Caffeic acid[6]
21.07507.049−0.272.7507.050, 444.951C23H24O13Syringetin-3-O-galactoside[13]
31.08317.0501.177317.056, 273.071, 249.004, 213.035, 191.055, 80.963C15H10O8Myricetin[14]
41.08405.0982.571.9405.099, 404.874, 299.083, 191.055C20H22O9E-3,4,5′-Trihydroxy-3′-glucopyranosylstilbene
(Astringin)		[15]
51.10191.0552.685.2191.055, 190.445, 173.040, 171.028, 153.020, 137.023C7H12O6
D-(-)-Quinic acid[16]
61.16174.077−0.381.9174.074, 144.068, 128.066C10H9NO2β-indoleacetic acid[17]
71.24447.112−0.986.3447.077, 446.996, 379.080, 191.053, 102.954C21H20O11Quercitrin[18]
81.29163.06−3.386.2163.060, 119.041C9H8O33-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-enoic acid[19]
91.45593.153−2.482.5593.112, 285.301, 248.955C27H30O15Kaempferol-7-neohesperidoside[6]
101.81353.088−0.786.1353.065, 191.055, 179.037, 161.023C16H18O9Chlorogenic acid[20]
113.70339.104−21.988.1339.112, 177.014C15H16O9Esculin[21]
124.14445.135−0.481.1445.135, 269.425, 161.032C21H18O11Baicalein-7-O-glucuronide[22,23]
135.09315.108177.1315.108, 269.098C16H12O73′-methoxy-4′,5,7- trihydroxyflavonol (Isorhamnetin)[6]
145.44431.1894.184.2431.189, 385.187, 335.081, 285.524, 223.133, 205.128C21H20O10Kaempferol-3-O-α-L-rhamnoside (Afzelin)[6]
156.24609.174−4691.9609.143, 607.169, 343.025, 301.033, 300.027, 299.059, 272.036C27H31O16Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Rutin)[22]
166.25609.1433.192.1609.143, 607.169, 343.025, 302.415, 301.033, 300.027, 299.059C27H31O16Delphinidin-3-O-(6″-O-α-rhamnopyranosyl-β-glucopyranoside)[24]
176.58463.088−0.992.7463.085, 461.594, 445.094, 343.051, 301.038, 300.026C21H20O12Isoquercitrin[25]
186.78449.104−6.286.4449.111, 287.040, 151.006C21H22O11Isookanin-7-glucoside[26]
196.86593.152−191.3593.150, 591.226, 285.039, 284.005, 255.031C30H26O13Kaempferol-3-O-(6-p-coumaroyl)-glucoside
[6]
206.88433.076−0.284.9433.056, 301.078C20H18O11Quercetin-3-D-xyloside[27]
216.99623.162−0.685.5623.155, 315.036C28H32O16Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside[28]
227.00447.095−3.985.1447.093, 285.043, 284.031, 255.028C21H20O11Luteolin-7-O-glucoside[20]
237.2447.0920.287447.096, 445.646, 285.038, 284.033, 256.033, 255.033C21H20O11Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside (astragalin)[29]
247.30415.197−0.677.6415.189, 392.128, 253.524, 179.055, 170.951C21H20O9Daidzein-8-C-glucoside (Puerarin)[30]
257.46477.106−2.580.8477.097, 409.160, 315.530C22H22O12Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside[28]
267.68433.1113.481.4433.118, 387.207, 271.056C21H22O10Naringenin-7-O-glucoside[31]
278.70193.049−3.386.2193.050, 178.030, 162.036, 161.022C10H10O43-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) prop-2-enoic acid[32]
289.51301.0329.179.4301.035, 178.998, 150.994C15H10O7Quercetin[28]
299.55359.1701.671.2359.132, 331.070C18H16O8Rosmarinic acid[21]
309.79417.156−38.683.5417.160, 285.412C20H18O10Kaempferol-3-O-α-L-arabinoside[31]
319.89625.1531.480.5625.148, 579.297, 301.634C27H30O17Quercetin-3,4′-O-di-β-glucopyranoside (QDG)[32]
3210.25271.0610.380.7271.063, 252.033C15H12O5Naringenin[24]
3310.38177.0542.673.3177.055, 162.021, 145.030, 134.038, 121.022, 118.041C9H6O4Daphnetin[33]
3410.60609.160−23.685.4609.149, 285.152C27H30O16
Luteolin-3′,7-di-O-glucoside[34,35]
3510.76207.0650.789207.066, 192.041, 177.025, 133.028C11H12O4Sinapyl aldehyde[36]
3610.81285.0400.883285.036C15H10O6Luteolin[28]
3712.31301.0720.871.8301.072, 165.008, 135.044, 134.036C16H14O6Hesperetin[6]
3813.57269.0802.685.4269.079C15H10O5Apigenin[28]
3913.80285.076177.1285.076, 191.036, 165.014, 119.041C15H10O64′,5,7-trihydroxyflavonol[6]
4014.00283.062−2.484.9283.060, 282.158, 268.037, 240.039, 149.996C16H12O5Acacetin[6]
4114.20299.0550.974.2299.056, 284.032, 271.044, 256.030, 243.068, 240.032C16H12O63′,5,7-trihydroxy-4’-methoxyflavone[6]
4214.40591.197−35.186.6591.174, 283.065C28H32O14Acacetin-7-O-rutinoside (Linarin)[31]
4316.10471.347077.9471.345C30H48O43β,23-dihydroxy-urs-12-en-28-oic acid[37]
4416.87469.328679.3469.329C30H46O49,19-Cyclolanost-24-ene-3,23-dione[25]
4521.33279.233−0.981.8279.234C18H32O29–12-Octadecadienoic acid[38]
4622.63455.353-0.979.3455.320C30H48O3Ursolic acid[25]
4723.12255.233−0.483255.231C16H32O2Palmitic acid[38,39]
4824.00611.154−3.484.3611.147C28H36O15Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone[39]
Table
Table 2. Impact of rutin and leaves methanol extract on liver index and liver function tests of mice.
Table 2. Impact of rutin and leaves methanol extract on liver index and liver function tests of mice.
GroupsLiver Index (%)ALT (U/L)AST (U/L)
Control (NC)3.50 ± 0.7621.59 ± 0.4925.96 ± 0.51
Diseased group (DG)4.84 ± 0.86 a110.25 ± 0.86 a86.91 ± 0.73 a
Simvastatin3.66 ± 0.64 b76.98 ± 0.66 b76.89 ± 0.66 b
Rutin 50 mg/kg4.76 ± 0.7989.63 ± 0.74 b79.34 ± 0.67 b
Rutin 75 mg/kg2.71 ± 0.63 b,c60.71 ± 0.51 b,c71.29 ± 0.66 b,c
Rutin 100 mg/kg4.21 ± 0.69102.30 ± 0.79 b84.36 ± 0.71 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 100 mg/kg3.92 ± 0.51 b95.84 ± 0.69 b80.99 ± 0.61 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 200 mg/kg2.85 ± 0.53 b,c80.36 ± 0.69 b78.63 ± 0.65 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 300 mg/kg4.76 ± 0.73110.60 ± 0.8886.01 ± 0.63
Data displayed as mean ± SD, n = 6 per group. NC: normal control, DG: diseased group. Statistics were calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by an LSD comparison test. a: significant according to the normal control group, b: significant according to the diseased group, c: significant according to the simvastatin group. Significance was assessed at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Effect of rutin and leaves methanol extract on the lipid profile of mice.
Table 3. Effect of rutin and leaves methanol extract on the lipid profile of mice.
GroupsTC (mmole/L)TG (mmole/L)HDL-C (mmole/L)LDL-C (mmole/L)
NC2.55 ± 0.561.56 ± 0.442.11 ± 0.662.09 ± 0.76
DG10.40 ± 0.74 a2.65 ± 0.71 a1.36 ± 0.33 a4.96 ± 0.88 a
Simvastatin3.97 ± 0.41 b1.58 ± 0.66 b2.25 ± 0.52 b2.11 ± 0.51 b
Rutin 50 mg/kg6.84 ± 0.64 b2.01 ± 0.37 1.50 ± 0.434.80 ± 0.86
Rutin 75 mg/kg4.36 ± 0.48 b1.66 ± 0.58 b2.34 ± 0.48 b2.99 ± 0.66 b
Rutin 100 mg/kg7.90 ± 0.76 b2.33 ± 0.761.53 ± 0.363.76 ± 0.41 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 100/kg5.33 ± 0.61 b2.05 ± 0.861.62 ± 0.353.99 ± 0.43 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 200/kg4.97 ± 0.53 b1.69 ± 0.74 b2.30 ± 0.66 b3.01 ± 0.56 b
G. thunbergia methanol extract of leaves 300/kg6.01 ± 0.71 b2.31 ± 0.852.40 ± 0.57 b4.76 ± 0.81
Data presented Mean ± SD, n = 6 per group. NC: normal control, DG: diseased group. p < 0.05 was significant by one-way ANOVA followed by LSD comparison test. a: significant according to the normal control group, b: significant according to the diseased group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

EL-Shial, E.M.; Kabbash, A.; El-Aasr, M.; El-Feky, O.A.; El-Sherbeni, S.A. Elucidation of Natural Components of Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves: Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Molecules 2023, 28, 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020879

AMA Style

EL-Shial EM, Kabbash A, El-Aasr M, El-Feky OA, El-Sherbeni SA. Elucidation of Natural Components of Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves: Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):879. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020879

Chicago/Turabian Style

EL-Shial, Eman M., Amal Kabbash, Mona El-Aasr, Ola A. El-Feky, and Suzy A. El-Sherbeni. 2023. "Elucidation of Natural Components of Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves: Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease" Molecules 28, no. 2: 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020879

APA Style

EL-Shial, E. M., Kabbash, A., El-Aasr, M., El-Feky, O. A., & El-Sherbeni, S. A. (2023). Elucidation of Natural Components of Gardenia thunbergia Thunb. Leaves: Effect of Methanol Extract and Rutin on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Molecules, 28(2), 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020879

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop