Next Article in Journal
Aroma Difference Analysis of Partridge Tea (Mallotus oblongifolius) with Different Drying Treatments Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS Technique
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Photoelectrocatalytic TiO2-Co3O4/Co(OH)2 Materials Prepared from Bio-Based Surfactants for Water Splitting
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition of Litsea pungens Essential Oil and Its Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selectivity of Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal TiO2 Nanoparticles towards Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic and Anionic Dyes

1
Department of Chemistry, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
2
Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
3
Institute of Carbon Technology, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Republic of Korea
4
Graduate School of Integrated Energy-AI, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(19), 6834; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28196834
Submission received: 27 July 2023 / Revised: 23 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 27 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Composite Photocatalysts)

Abstract

:
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been extensively studied for catalyzing the photo-degradation of organic pollutants, the photocatalyst being nonselective to the substrate. We, however, found that TiO2 nanoparticles prepared via the sol-gel and hydrothermal synthetic routes each possess a definite specificity to the charge of the substrate for photodegradation. The nanoparticles were characterized by SEM, FTIR, XRD, TGA, and UV-visible spectra, and the photocatalytic degradation under UV-B (285 nm) irradiation of two model compounds, anionic methyl Orange (MO) and cationic methylene blue (MB) was monitored by a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Untreated sol-gel TiO2 nanoparticles (Tsg) preferentially degraded MO over MB (90% versus 40% in two hours), while after calcination at 400 °C for two hours (Tsgc) they showed reversed specificity (50% MO versus 90% MB in one hour). The as-prepared hydrothermal TiO2 nanoparticles (Tht) behaved in the opposite sense of Tsg (41% MO versus 91% MB degraded in one and a half hours); calcination at 400 °C (Thtc) did not reverse the trend but enhanced the efficiency of degradation. The study indicates that TiO2 nanoparticles can be made to degrade a specific class of organic pollutants from an effluent facilitating the recycling of a specific class of pollutants for cost-effective effluent management.

1. Introduction

Synthetic dyes are extensively used in dying textiles, leathers, papers, plastics, and fibers. However, most of the synthetic dyes are toxic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and allergenic. Discharging the wastewater of these dyeing industries has instigated a major problem of water contamination as these dyes contain stable aromatic rings that resist degradation under normal conditions [1,2,3,4,5]. Thus, the removal of these organic contaminants from the effluents by degrading them into environmentally benign fragments is energy-intensive and costly. Accordingly, the cost-effective removal of synthetic dyes from the effluents to guard against their adverse effect on the environment is a big challenge. Selective degradation of some of the components from the effluents can pave the way for recycling and cost-effective management of the effluents of these industries.
Nanometric titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a chemically stable, strongly oxidizing, nontoxic, and environmentally benign photocatalyst material that has found applications in diversified fields, e.g., in the photodegradation of organic pollutants, hydrogen generation by water splitting, solar energy conversion, self-cleaning coating technology, in biosensors and bioimaging devices, and dye-sensitized solar cells to name a few [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The synthetic method is a crucial factor in the photocatalytic and structural properties of the nanoparticles. There are many synthetic routes to nano-TiO2, such as hydrothermal [14,15], sol-gel [16,17], solvothermal [18,19], direct oxidation [20,21], chemical vapor deposition [22] and microwave methods [23,24]. Each of these synthetic routes may produce TiO2 nanoparticles of different crystalline modifications including the amorphous phase.
TiO2 has three crystalline polymorphs such as anatase, rutile, and brookite, each of which may show different photocatalytic activity. Moreover, the chemical reactivity may strongly depend on the crystalline structure, morphology, size, and shape of the TiO2 nanoparticles of a particular crystalline polymorph [25,26,27,28]. It has been demonstrated that nanoscale TiO2 such as nano-spheres, nano-prisms, nano-wires, nano-rods, and nano-tubes having appreciably large specific surface areas lead to better physical and chemical properties [29], including catalyzing photo-degradation of organic pollutants. This makes it essential to compare and evaluate different synthetic methods for obtaining control over the size, shape, surface properties, and crystalline polymorph of the TiO2 nanoparticles for making the best use of their photocatalytic ability.
In this study, we have demonstrated that the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by two different synthetic routes, such as sol-gel and hydrothermal are quite specific toward the photocatalytic degradation of cationic and anionic dyes under UV-B irradiation (285 nm). We have found that the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of untreated TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the sol-gel technique is remarkably higher for the anionic model dye methyl orange (MO), compared to methylene blue (MB), a cationic dye (90% for MO versus 40% for MB degradation within two hours). The said specificity was reversed for the same nanoparticles calcined at 400 °C, especially in the early stage of the degradation reaction (50% for MO versus 90% for MB in one hour). On the other hand, the as-synthesized hydrothermal nanoparticles displayed specificity opposite of the as-synthesized sol-gel nanoparticles (91% for MB versus 41% for MO in one and a half hours).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphological, Structural, Photophysical, and Thermal Analysis of TiO2 Nanoparticles

The morphology of the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the sol-gel method: as-prepared (Tsg), and calcined at 400 °C (Tsgc) and by the hydrothermal method: as-prepared (Tsg), and calcined at 400 °C (Thtc) were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the SEM micrographs are shown in Figure 1. From the SEM images, we observe that the nanoparticles synthesized by both methods were agglomerated and non-uniform in size. The size distribution curves of the Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc nanoparticles have been shown in the insets of Figure 1. The size range of the Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc nanoparticles were 17–26 nm, 68–97 nm, 12–32 nm, and 27–39 nm, respectively. The shape of Tsg and Tsgc were approximately spherical (Figure 1a,b) whereas that of Tht and Thtc were approximately rectangular prism and cubic (Figure 1c,d), and the surfaces of all the nanoparticles were rough.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy being a surface-sensitive analytical technique provides valuable information on the surface region of the nanoparticles. The FTIR spectra of the nanoparticles are displayed in Figure 2. These are typical of the TiO2 nanoparticles confirming their successful synthesis. The broad absorption band observed in the region 400–800 cm−1 originated from Ti–O and bridging Ti–O–Ti stretching vibrations, while the absorption peak at 1386 cm−1 is associated with the Ti–O bending vibrations. The absorption band at 3420 and 1615 cm−1 represented the –O–H stretching and bending vibrations, respectively, of water chemisorbed on the TiO2 nanoparticle surface. The two small absorption peaks at ~2915 and ~2842 cm−1 have been assigned to be associated with the Ti–OH bond vibrations [11,30]. The extra absorption peaks at ~1428 and ~1528 cm−1 found in as-prepared sol-gel TiO2 (Tsg) can be attributed to the adsorbed organic materials on the surface of the nanoparticles during synthesis.
The adsorbed organic material on the surface of the nanoparticles was estimated by the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) profiles of the nanoparticles (Figure 3). The TGA trace of Tsg exhibited three-stage weight loss typical for TiO2 nanoparticles [4,5,6,7,8]. The first ca. 6% weight loss below 200 °C mainly originated from the evaporation of physisorbed water and alcohols on the nanocomposite surface. The second weight loss of ca. 7% in the region 200 °C–500 °C for Tsg correlated mainly with the degradation of the organic components, which were adsorbed from the reaction mixture during synthesis. The third minor weight loss occurring above 500 °C was attributed to the loss of water produced by the condensation of neighboring terminal Ti–OH groups on the nanoparticle surfaces [10,11,12,13]. For the nanoparticles obtained after calcination of Tsg at 400 °C, the weight loss beyond 200 °C was minor, apparently due to the almost complete removal of the adsorbed organic materials during calcination. Only a slight weight loss (<1%) of hydrothermal Tht and Thtc indicated that they were pure TiO2 with cleaner surfaces. The heavy loss of weight (ca. 16%) for the as-prepared sol-gel nanoparticles, Tsg indicated a high concentration of organic material adsorbed on the surface of this nanoparticle.
The crystalline phases of the synthesized Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc nanoparticles were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the representative patterns are displayed in Figure 4. The precise Bragg diffraction peaks signify the crystalline nature of the nanoparticles. The Bragg diffraction peaks designated by (A) agreed with the anatase phase of TiO2 with tetragonal arrangement [31,32,33], especially, the two most intense diffraction peaks found in all of the samples, viz., at (2θ) 25.0° and 48.0° are typical of the anatase phase. This result indicates that all of the prepared TiO2 nanoparticles were predominantly of the anatase phase. As observed in SEM images (Figure 1), the sol-gel TiO2 nanoparticles were smaller in size, which resulted in relatively broad diffraction peaks and consequently alongside peaks were not resolved. The hydrothermal TiO2 nanoparticles Tht prepared at 240 °C being larger, the diffraction peaks were well resolved and confirmed with the anatase polymorph. However, after calcination at 400 °C the hydrothermal TiO2, Thtc, displayed two additional diffraction peaks (designated by B) at (2θ) ~31° and ~58°, the former of which is the (d121) peak of the brookite phase [34,35], confirming that Thtc is a mixture of anatase and brookite crystalline polymorphs of TiO2.
The degree of crystallinity (λ) of the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles calculated from the XRD data [32] according to Equation (1),
λ = A c / ( A c + A a ) × 100 %
where A c is the area covered by the crystallization peaks and ( A c + A a ) is the total crystalline and amorphous area calculated by OriginLab’s Origin software (version 2019b 64bit), is shown in Table 1. The crystal size (l) of the nanoparticles calculated from the XRD data according to the method of Scherrer [36] is also presented in Table 1. The XRD data revealed that the size of the sol-gel nanocrystals was much smaller than the hydrothermal nanocrystals. The size increased by about 40% and 24% after the calcination of the sol-gel and the hydrothermal nanocrystals, respectively. The degree of crystallinity of all the nanoparticles was low compared to the commercial Degussa (Evonik) P25 TiO2 photocatalyst (total crystallinity 92% in a typical sample) [37]. However, the degree of crystallinity was increased by 108% for the sol-gel nanoparticles while that of the hydrothermal nanoparticles decreased by 46% upon calcination. The decrease in crystallinity can be attributed to the fact that for the Thtc sample, which is a mix of anatase and brookite, the growth of the brookite phase at the expense of the anatase phase during calcination slowed down the crystallization process [38].
Figure 5 displays the UV-visible spectra of stable sols of the photocatalysts in ethanol. The λ m a x for Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc were 300 nm, 313 nm, 335 nm, and 358 nm, respectively. Thus, there is a red shift of 13 nm and 23 nm of the λ m a x for the sol-gel and the hydrothermal nanoparticles, respectively, upon calcination. As the λ m a x is related to the absorption onset, it can be inferred that the optical bandgap of the materials significantly reduced upon calcination [39].

2.2. Photocatalytic Degradation Study

The catalytic efficiency of the nanoparticles for photodegradation of two model organic dyes, MB and MO was conducted at 10 °C under UV-B irradiation; a detailed procedure is given in Section 3.4. MB is cationic whereas MO is anionic. The choice of these model compounds was made to exploit their contrasting chemical nature for studying the selectivity of the nanoparticles for catalyzing the photodegradation of a particular class of compounds, and also because they have previously been extensively used as model compounds for photodegradation study [4,5,32].

2.2.1. Control Experiment

A control experiment was conducted under identical experimental conditions without the presence of any photocatalyst, the data of which are presented in Figure 6. The intensity of absorption maximum of the dyes decreased only slightly during three hours of UV-B irradiation, displaying negligible degradation of the dyes without a photocatalyst (Figure 6a,b).

2.2.2. Determination of the Optimum Dose of the Nanoparticles

Before starting a photocatalytic degradation experiment, we determined the minimum amount of the nanoparticle (adsorbent) that can degrade the maximum amount of the substrate. The experiment for dose effect was carried out in the presence of the nanoparticles under UV-B irradiation at 10 °C for three hours. Figure 7 displays the % degradation of the model dye MB as a function of the amount of the nanoparticles Tsgc as representative. The maximum degradation efficiency of MB (98%) was observed at the optimum dose of 8 mg/10 mL of the catalyst. Subsequent degradation experiments were conducted by using this optimum dose.

2.2.3. Adsorption Study

We conducted an adsorption study using the optimum dose of 8 mg/10 mL of the nanoparticles Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc on 10 ppm solutions of MB and MO under dark conditions at ambient temperature (25 °C) for 30 min and the data are accumulated in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. As we can observe from Figure 8 that the adsorption capacity of the sol-gel Tsg, and Tsgc nanoparticles for cationic MB was negligible, while that of the hydrothermal Tht and Thtc was quite high at 26% and 13%, respectively. The corresponding data for the adsorption of anionic MO are shown in Figure 9 where it is clear that the adsorption capacity of all the nanoparticles studied was negligible for MO excepting Tsg, which showed an appreciable adsorption of 16%.

2.2.4. Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic MB Dye under UV-B Irradiation

The photodegradation study of cationic MB was conducted in the presence of Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc under UV-B irradiation. The photocatalytic efficiency of the nanoparticles was determined by measuring the intensity of the optical absorption of MB in UV-visible spectra (λmax = 664 nm) of the reaction mixture as a function of time (Figure 10). The intensity slowly decreased with time indicating slow degradation of the dye, and it was not completely degraded even after 4 h, as displayed by the large absorption maxima of the undegraded dye in Figure 10a. Now the photocatalytic degradation of an organic compound on the surface of a nanoparticle consists of two steps; in the first step, the compound is adsorbed on the surface of the nanoparticles, followed by a photocatalytic reaction in the second step [4]. The highly active surface of the Tsg nanoparticles was already occupied by adsorbed organic materials from the reaction mixture during synthesis, as revealed in the TGA experiment, which hindered the approach of MB to the nanoparticle surface. The adsorption study displayed in Figure 8 revealed that the sol-gel nanoparticles have zero or negligible adsorption ability for MB. Both factors might have contributed to the slow and incomplete degradation of the dye during that time.
The as-synthesized nanoparticles (Tsg) were calcined for 2 h at 400 °C to clean the surface. In the presence of the calcined nanoparticles (Tsgc), the intensity of UV-visible absorption maxima of the reaction mixture quickly declined revealing that the degradation was very fast at the early stage and it took about 3 h for complete degradation (the λmax became indistinguishable from the baseline) as displayed in Figure 10b. The increased crystallinity (108% increase) of the calcined particles might have contributed to the effectiveness of the degradation [38]. It is interesting to note that the photodegradation of MB catalyzed by the hydrothermal nanoparticles (Tht) was almost identical to that in the presence of calcined sol-gel nanoparticles (Tsgc) as revealed in the UV-visible absorption profile of the reaction mixtures shown in Figure 10b and Figure 10c, respectively. This is because the surface of both the nanoparticles was almost clean (cf. Figure 3), and also, they both were an anatase polymorph of TiO2 having the same level of crystallinity (cf. Table 1). The degradation efficiency of the hydrothermal nanoparticles increased after calcination at 400 °C (Thtc), as observed in the absorbance profile of the reaction mixture shown in Figure 10d, although its degree of crystallinity decreased upon calcination. This is because Thtc is a mix of the anatase and brookite phases of TiO2, which is well known to have much better photocatalytic efficiency than pure anatase or brookite due to a synergistic effect that facilitates charge separation and reduces electron-hole recombination [40,41,42]. This fact is also reflected in the large red shift of the absorption maxima of the nanoparticle dispersion in UV-visible spectra of Thtc in our study (cf. Figure 5).

2.2.5. Photocatalytic Degradation of Anionic MO Dye under UV-B Irradiation

The photodegradation of anionic MO was conducted in the same set-up under identical conditions and the results are shown in Figure 11. The photocatalytic efficiency of the nanoparticles was determined from the intensity of the λmax (464 nm) of MO. The UV-visible absorption profiles of the reaction mixtures revealed that the photodegradation of MO was fast at the initial stage and it was almost complete within one and a half hours in the presence of the Tsg nanoparticles as displayed in Figure 11a, reflecting some attractive interaction of the dye with the nanoparticle surface due to the presence of the adsorbed organic materials on it. After calcination at 400 °C (Tsgc), the nanoparticle surface became clean and the surface gained a negative character due to the lone pair electrons on the oxygen atoms of the TiO2 surface, creating a repulsive interaction with the negatively charged MO, as a result, the photocatalytic efficiency decreased [30] and it took almost three hours for complete degradation, as observed in Figure 11b. The adsorption study presented in Figure 9a and Figure 9b displaying a 16% and 0% adsorption of MO on Tsg and Tsgc, respectively may be taken as a support of the photocatalytic behavior of the two nanoparticles. In the case of the as-prepared hydrothermal nanoparticles (Tht), the degradation efficiency was much slower relative to the as-prepared sol-gel (Tsg) nanoparticles as revealed in Figure 11c. Even though the crystallinity decreased upon calcination, it made the hydrothermal nanoparticles (Thtc) a somewhat better photocatalyst for degradation of MO, as the same level of degradation was achieved within two hours that took more than 3.5 h by Tht. This is because Thtc is an anatase-brookite mixed phase as revealed by XRD analysis, which is well known to have a much better photocatalytic efficiency than pure anatase or brookite [40,41,42], as explained in the previous section. However, near 100% degradation was not observed in the presence of the hydrothermal nanoparticles before or after calcination, which is in clear contrast with the efficiency of the as-prepared sol-gel nanoparticles Tsg that catalyzed the photodegradation of MB to near completion within one and a half hours.

2.2.6. Degradation Study in the Absence of Light

The photocatalytic nature of the degradation of the model dyes by the synthesized nanoparticles was confirmed by carrying out the reaction between the dye and the nanoparticles under identical conditions but in the absence of any light (dark conditions) and the results are presented in Figure 12 for MB and in Figure 13 for MO. In the case of MB, the removal of the dye was 0% by the sol-gel nanoparticles Tsg and Tsgc whereas the maximum removal was 35% and 41% by the hydrothermal nanoparticles Tht and Thtc, respectively. The data are consistent with the adsorption study presented in Figure 8, revealing that the removal of the dye by the hydrothermal nanoparticles was solely due to adsorption. Also, the UV-visible spectra in Figure 12c,d were not consistent with time, presumably due to the uncertainty arising from the desorption of the dye from the nanoparticle surface during centrifugation and handling, revealing the physical nature of the adsorption. In the case of MO, a maximum removal of 10% was observed from corresponding UV-visible absorption spectra (Figure 13) for both the as-prepared sol-gel and hydrothermal nanoparticles Tsg and Tht, which was also inconsistent with reaction time; whereas the calcined nanoparticles Tsgc and Thtc did not show any removal efficiency. The results confirm that the removal of the dye by the nanoparticles under UV-B irradiation discussed in Section 2.2.4 and Section 2.2.5 was photocatalytic in nature.

2.2.7. XRD Analysis of the Recovered Nanoparticles

The nanoparticles were recovered after each photocatalysis experiment by centrifugation, repeatedly washed with ultrapure water and methanol, and dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C. The stability of the photocatalysts was assessed by taking XRD of the recovered nanoparticles. The XRD patterns are displayed in Figure 14 and the crystallinity and crystallite size data obtained from XRD analysis are presented in Table 2.
It is revealed from Table 2 that the crystallite size of the nano-catalysts remained practically unchanged after the photocatalytic reactions. However, the effect of the harsh reaction condition on the crystallinity of the nanoparticles was mixed (cf. Table 1). In the case of the sol-gel nanoparticles, the trend in the change of crystallinity was the same irrespective of the dye photodegraded: crystallinity of the uncalcined nanoparticle dramatically increased while it decreased to an appreciable extent for the calcined species. In the case of hydrothermal nanoparticles, the crystallinity of the uncalcined species increased after the photodegradation reaction of MB while it slightly decreased after photodegradation MO. For the calcined hydrothermal nanoparticles, a huge increase in crystallinity was observed after the degradation of both the model dyes: 159% after MB degradation and 120% after MO degradation. From the results, it is inferred that the moderate energy UV-B radiation played a major role in altering the crystallinity of the photocatalyst species rather than the dye substrate it degraded. It is to be noted that the increase in the crystallinity in the photocatalyst was more pronounced for the species that had relatively lower levels of crystallinity at the outset. The huge (159%) increase in crystallinity obtained in Thtc, a mix of the brookite and the anatase TiO2 nanomaterial, is reflected in the XRD pattern of the material by the appearance of several additional diffraction peaks characteristic of the brookite phase TiO2, which may indicate that the reaction condition favored the formation of the brookite phase of TiO2. Further study on the matter is in progress.

2.2.8. Selectivity of the Prepared Nanoparticles towards Catalyzing the Photodegradation of MB and MO under UV-B Irradiation

Figure 15 compares the results of the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of the TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by the sol-gel and the hydrothermal synthetic routes, and also the effect of calcination of these nanoparticles on the degradation efficiency. The untreated TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the sol-gel technique were remarkably selective in catalyzing the photodegradation of the model anionic dye MO over the cationic MB (90% for MO versus 40% for MB degradation in two hours) (Figure 15a). The said selectivity was reversed for the nanoparticles calcined at 400 °C, especially in the early stage of the degradation reaction (50% for MO versus 90% for MB in one hour) (Figure 15b). The as-prepared hydrothermal TiO2 nanoparticles displayed selectivity in the opposite sense of the as-prepared sol-gel nanoparticles (Tsg) towards the degradation of the said model dyes: 41% degradation for MO versus 91% degradation for MB in one and a half hours (Figure 15c). Unlike the sol-gel particles, the selectivity towards degrading the model dyes did not alter for the hydrothermal nanoparticles after calcination (Figure 15d); however, the rate of conversion increased significantly due to improved crystallinity and formation of a mix of anatase and brookite phases in the photocatalyst upon calcination [38] that presumably decreased optical bandgap of the calcined materials, as discussed in Section 2.1 under Figure 5 and in Section 2.2.4 and Section 2.2.5 above.
For a better quantitative description of the photocatalytic specificity of the synthesized nanoparticles, the UV-visible spectroscopic data were utilized for analyzing the kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation of the dyes. The initial degradation reaction reasonably followed the apparent first-order kinetic path [30,43,44] according to Equation (2),
ln(C0/Ct) = kt
where C0 and Ct are the initial concentration and the concentration of the substrate at time t, during the photocatalytic reaction under UV-B irradiation at 10 °C in the presence of the nanoparticles; k is the apparent first-order rate constant.
The plots of ln(C0/Ct) versus time (t) of UV-B irradiation are presented in Figure 16 and the values of the apparent first-order rate constant k, along with the half-life for the degradation of the model dyes are presented in Table 3. The selectivity of the untreated sol-gel TiO2 nanoparticle Tsg for catalyzing the photodegradation of MO over MB is also clear from the apparent t1/2 values of 36.5 min for MO versus 210 min for MB. For the calcined sol-gel nano-catalyst Tsgc, the t1/2 values are 57.8 min and 16.0 min for MO and MB, respectively, clearly revealing the reversal of the specificity. Both untreated (Tht) and calcined (Thtc) hydrothermal nanoparticles were more selective for degrading the cationic dye MB than the anionic dye MO which is reflected in the t1/2 data, with Thtc having higher rate constants because it is a mix of the anatase and brookite phases [40,41,42].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) was obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Analytical-grade chemicals such as aqueous ammonia solution (28 wt%), acetic acid, methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), MO, and MB were utilized without additional purification. Ultrapure water (UP) was obtained from a reverse osmosis water purification system, WPB-RO-15-UVF from MRC Laboratory Equipment Limited, Essex, UK.

3.2. Preparation of the TiO2 Nanoparticles

3.2.1. Preparation of TiO2 Nanoparticles by Sol-Gel Technique

TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized by the sol-gel method according to the scheme shown in Figure 17a. In a typical procedure, 9.68 g of TTIP were dissolved in 20 mL of isopropanol by stirring magnetically at 450 rpm for 20 min in a three-necked 500 mL round-bottom flask. Then acetic acid (1.2 mL) and ultrapure water (250 mL) were added into the TTIP solution, with the stirring continued. The reaction was carried out for 24 h at 60 °C. Following the reaction, the product was centrifuged and washed with EtOH. The centrifugation-redispersion washing procedure was repeated five times. Finally, the TiO2 nanoparticles were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h. The product obtained was 1.978 g (73% yield). A portion of the product was calcined at 400 °C for 2 h in a muffle furnace.

3.2.2. Preparation of TiO2 Nanoparticles by Hydrothermal Technique

TiO2 nanoparticles were also synthesized from TTIP following the hydrothermal technique, as described schematically in Figure 17b. Sodium hydroxide was used as the mineralizer and TTIP as the source material. In a typical procedure, 14.50 g TTIP was added to 50.0 mL of ultrapure water with vigorous magnetic stirring. A milky white sol was produced. The pH of the sol was adjusted to 10 by dropwise addition of an aqueous 1.0 M NaOH solution over several minutes. Finally, the sol was diluted to 90 mL by adding ultrapure water and was transferred to a 200 mL Teflon-lined autoclave jar. The jar was sealed in a stainless steel housing and was heated to 240 °C for 12 h in a thermostatic oven. Following the reaction, the product was purified from a 3:2 ultrapure water/EtOH medium by five consecutive centrifugation-redispersion cycles. Finally, TiO2 nanoparticles were dried at 60 °C for 24 h in a vacuum oven (3.1030 g, 76% yield). A portion of the product was calcined at 400 °C for 2 h in a muffle furnace.

3.3. Instruments

The surface Morphology of the nanoparticles was studied by a Scanning Electron Microscope (Model no. JSM-7610F from JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the materials were taken on a PerkinElmer FTIR spectrophotometer, model number FTIR-100. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the materials was conducted on a PerkinElmer STA-6000 instrument at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under an N2 gas environment. The XRD of the samples was taken on a Rigaku, SmartLab-SE X-Ray Diffraction Analyzer. A Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) DR 1800 UV-visible spectrometer was used for optical absorbance measurement as a function of the wavelength in the range of 200–800 nm. A centrifuge machine (Model no. BKC-TH1611, Biobase Corporation, Jinan, China) operated at 10,000 rpm was used for the purification of the nanoparticles by repeated washing.

3.4. Adsorption and Degradation Experiments

An aqueous solution of MB or MO (10 mg/L) was mixed with either Tsg or Tsgc or Tht or Thtc (8 mg/10 mL) and placed in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min and then kept in the dark for 30 min at ambient temperature (25 °C) under unstirred condition after which a portion of the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 rpm and UV-visible spectra of the supernatant was taken. The extent of adsorption was calculated from the difference in the UV-visible absorption of the supernatant from that of the initial dye solution.
For the degradation experiment, the sonicated dye/nanoparticle dispersion was taken in a double-walled Pyrex glass reaction vessel (100 mL) connected to a thermostatic water bath set at 10 °C. Before applying UV-B radiation, the reaction mixture was magnetically stirred in the dark for 30 min. Then, a UV light source (Quartz UV-B bulb, 3 w, 285 nm) was applied to the dye/nanoparticle dispersion for a desired period. The degradation reaction was followed by withdrawing 5.0 mL aliquots of the reaction mixture at regular intervals, centrifuging for 5 min at 6000 rpm, and measuring the absorbance of the supernatant with a UV-visible spectrophotometer. A degradation study of the model dye compounds was also carried out in an identical manner in the absence of light for comparison.
The extent of removal of the dye by adsorption or degradation in the presence of the TiO2-nanoparticles in a certain time ( r r e m in %) was calculated from the following Equation (3):
r r e m = a 0 a t a 0 × 100 %
where a 0 and a t are the absorbances at times 0 and t, respectively.

4. Conclusions

TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel and hydrothermal routes and annealed (calcined) at 400 °C were characterized by standard methods. The catalytic efficiency of the nanoparticles for the photodegradation of two organic model compounds, cationic methylene blue (MB) and anionic methyl orange (MO), under UV-B (285 nm) irradiation was investigated. The untreated sol-gel nanoparticle (Tsg) showed a higher selectivity for catalyzing photodegradation of MO than MB (90% versus 40% in two hours). This was attributed to an attractive interaction between anionic MO and the nanoparticle surface that adsorbed organic matter during synthesis acquiring a positive charge, facilitating photodegradation of the former. For the annealed nanoparticles (Tsgc) the selectivity for photocatalysis reversed (50% for MO versus 90% for MB in one hour) as the surface of Tsgc was clean and negative due to the lone-pair electrons of oxygen of TiO2; it preferentially adsorbed and more efficiently degraded the cationic MB relative to MO. The surface of the hydrothermal nanoparticle (Tht) was clean at the outset because it was synthesized at an elevated temperature (240 °C) for a longer period, and also had a negative character. Consequently, it showed a photocatalytic selectivity for the cationic MB over MO, a behavior similar to the calcined sol-gel nanoparticle Tsgc. The annealing of these particles (Thtc) did not alter the nature of the surface and hence the photocatalytic selectivity for MB was sustained. However, Thtc being an anatase-brookite mixed phase showed better photocatalytic efficiency than the as-prepared Tht for the photodegradation of both the model substrates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.H. and M.H.R.; methodology, M.S.H. and M.H.R.; software, M.T.I., M.N.P.R. and M.S.H.; validation, M.N.P.R., M.S.H., A.A.S.M.Z. and M.H.R.; formal analysis, M.T.I., M.N.E.A., M.Y.A., M.R.I., M.S.H., M.H.R. and M.A.H.; investigation, M.T.I., M.N.E.A., M.S.H. and M.H.R.; resources, M.S.H. and M.H.R.; data curation, M.S.H., M.H.R., M.N.E.A. and M.A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.I., M.S.H. and M.H.R.; writing—review and editing, M.S.H., M.H.R. and M.A.H.; visualization, M.S.H., M.H.R., M.S.A. and M.A.H.; supervision, M.S.H. and M.H.R.; project administration, M.S.H. and M.H.R.; funding acquisition, M.S.H. and M.H.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh through a Grant for Advanced Research in Education (GARE) (Project number: PS20201394).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Zümriye, A. Application of biosorption for the removal of organic pollutants: A review. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 997–1026. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tim, R.; Geoff, M.M.; Roger, M.; Poonam, N. Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: A critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pearce, C.I.; Lioyd, J.R.; Guitrie, J.T. The removal of color from textile wastewater using whole bacterial cells: A review. Dyes Pigm. 2003, 58, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hossan, M.S.; Ochiai, B. Preparation of TiO2-Poly(3-Chloro-2-Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate) Nanocomposite for Selective Adsorption and Degradation of Dyes. Technologies 2018, 6, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hossan, M.S.; Ochiai, B. Detailed Study on Rapid Removal of Cationic Dyes Using TiO2-poly(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B3240–B3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ali, I.; Suhali, M.; Alothman, Z.A.; Alwarthan, A. Recent advances in syntheses, properties and applications of TiO2 nanostructures. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 30125–30147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Noman, M.T.; Ashraf, M.A.; Ali, A. Synthesis and applications of nano-TiO2: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 3262–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. Low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akter, J.; Hanif, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Sapkota, K.P.; Hahn, J.R. Selective growth of Ti3+/TiO2/CNT and Ti3+/TiO2/C nanocomposite for enhanced visible-light utilization to degrade organic pollutants by lowering TiO2-bandgap. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kominami, H.; Murakami, S.; Kato, J.; Kera, Y.; Ohtani, B. Correlation Between Some Physical Properties of Titanium Dioxide Particles and Their Photocatalytic Activity for Some Probe Reactions in Aqueous Systems. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10501–10507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abazari, R.; Mahjoub, A.R.; Sanati, S. A facile and efficient preparation of anatase titania nanoparticles in micelle nanoreactors: Morphology, structure, and their high photocatalytic activity under UV light illumination. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 56406–56414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, N.-L.; Wang, S.-Y.; Rusakova, I.A. Inhibition of Crystallite Growth in the Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides. Science 1999, 285, 1375–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Takasu, Y.; Mizutani, S.; Kumagai, M.; Sawaguchi, S.; Murakami, Y. Ti-V-W-O/Ti Oxide Electrodes as Candidates for Electrochemical Capacitors. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 1999, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yao, G.; Yang, L.; Tao, J.; Gong, Z.; He, G.; Sun, Z. Band gap manipulation of cerium doping TiO2 nanopowders by hydrothermal method. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 662, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, H.H.; Chen, S.S.; Yang, S.Y.; Liu, H.M.; Lin, K.S. Sol-Gel Hydrothermal Synthesis and Visible Light Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of Fe/N Codoped TiO2 Catalysts. Materials 2018, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ángel-Sanchez, K.D.; Vázquez-Cuchillo, O.; Aguilar-Elguezabal, A.; Cruz-López, A.; Gómez, A.H. Photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid under visible light: Effect of synthesis route. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Albano, C.; Sarmiento, Y.; González, G. Synthesis and Characterization of Nanostructures: MWCNTf/TiO2 and MWCNTf/TiO2/Hap. Macromol. Symp. 2012, 321, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roman, A.G.; Zuñiga-Islas, C.; Quiroga-González, E. Immobilization of doped TiO2 nanostructures with Cu or In inside of macroporous silicon using the solvothermal method: Morphological, structural, optical and functional properties. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nam, C.T.; Yang, W.-D.; Duc, L.M. Solvothermal Synthesis of TiO2 Photocatalysts in Ketone Solvents with Low Boiling Points. J. Nanomat. 2013, 2013, 627385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, J.-M. Low-temperature preparation of titania nanorods through direct oxidation of titanium with hydrogen peroxide. Cryst. Growth 2004, 269, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, J.-M.; Hayakawa, S.; Tsuru, K.; Osaka, A. Nanocrystalline Titania Made from Interactions of Ti with Hydrogen Peroxide Solutions Containing Tantalum Chloride. Cryst. Growth Des. 2002, 2, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Djerdj, I.; Tonej, A.M.; Bijelic, M.; Vranesa, V.; Turkovic, A. Transmission electron microscopy studies of nanostructured TiO2 films on various substrates. Vacuum 2005, 80, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Corradi, A.B.; Bondioli, F.; Focher, B. Conventional and Microwave-Hydrothermal Synthesis of TiO2 Nanopowders. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 88, 2639–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Russo, P.A.; Lima, S.; Rebuttini, V.; Pillinger, M.; Willinger, M.G.; Pinna, N.; Valente, A.A. Microwave-assisted coating of carbon nanostructures with titanium dioxide for the catalytic dehydration of D-xylose into furfural. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2595–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.-C.; Zakaria, R.; Ying, J.Y. Role of Particle Size in Nanocrystalline TiO2–Based Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10871–10878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, H.; Finnegan, M.; Banfield, J.F. Preparing Single-Phase Nanocrystalline Anatase from Amorphous Titania with Particle Sizes Tailored by Temperature. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kavan, L.; Grätzel, M.; Gilbert, S.E.; Klemenz, C.; Scheel, H.J. Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Investigation of Single-Crystal Anatase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6716–6723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moritz, T.; Reiss, J.; Diesner, K.; Su, D.; Chemseddine, A. Nanostructured Crystalline TiO2 through Growth Control and Stabilization of Intermediate Structural Building Units. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 8052–8053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Z.H.; Zhong, X.H.; Liu, S.H. Aminolysis Route to Monodisperse Titania Nanorods with Tunable Aspect Ratio. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3466–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, S.; Wang, W.; Chen, J.; Li, J.G.; Li, X.; Sun, X.; Dong, Y. Foamed single-crystalline anatase nanocrystals exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 17837–17848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, J.-J.; Yu, C.-C. Aligned TiO2 Nanorods and Nanowalls. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 3377–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zulmajdi, S.L.N.; Zamri, N.I.I.; Mahadi, A.H.; Rosli, M.Y.H.; Ja’afar, F.; Yasin, H.M.; Kusrini, E.; Hobley, J.; Usman, A. Sol-gel Preparation of Different Crystalline Phases of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue in Aqueous Solution. Am. J. Nanomater 2019, 7, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srinivasu, P.; Singh, S.P.; Islam, A.; Han, L. Novel Approach for the Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Anatase Titania and Their Photovoltaic Application. Adv. OptoElectron. 2011, 2011, 539382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scarpelli, F.; Mastropietro, T.F.; Poerio, T.; Godbert, N. Mesoporous TiO2 Thin Films: State of the Art. In Titanium Dioxide-Material for a Sustainable Environment; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; Chapter 3; pp. 57–80. [Google Scholar]
  35. Koelsch, M.; Cassaignon, S.; Guillemoles, J.F.; Jolivet, J.P. Comparison of optical and electrochemical properties of anatase and brookite TiO2 synthesized by the sol-gel method. Thin Solid Film. 2002, 403–404, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patterson, A.L. The Scherrer Formula for X-Ray Particle Size Determination. Phys. Rev. 1939, 56, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohtani, B.; Prieto-Mahaney, O.O.; Li, D.; Abe, R. What is Degussa (Evonik) P25? Crystalline composition analysis, reconstruction from isolated pure particles and photocatalytic activity test. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 216, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Manzoli, M.; Freyria, F.; Blangetti, N.; Bonelli, B. Brookite, a sometimes under evaluated TiO2 polymorph. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 3322–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hanif, M.A.; Lee, I.; Akter, J.; Islam, M.A.; Zahid, A.A.S.M.; Sapkota, K.P.; Hahn, J.R. Enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial performance of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by an efficient thermolysis method. Catalysts 2019, 9, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kandiel, T.A.; Robben, L.; Alkaim, A.; Bahnemann, D. Brookite versus anatase TiO2 photocatalysts: Phase transformations and photocatalytic activities. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 12, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buckeridge, J.; Butler, K.; Catlow, C.; Logsdail, A.; Scanlon, D.; Shevlin, S.; Woodley, S.; Sokol, A.; Walsh, A. Polymorph Engineering of TiO2: Demonstrating How Absolute Reference Potentials are Determined by Local Coordination. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3844–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jawale, N.S.; Arbuj, S.S.; Umarji, G.G.; Rane, S.B. Synthesis of Anatase/Brookite Mixed Phase TiO2 Nanostructures and its Photocatalytic Performance Study. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 8861–8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hanif, M.A.; Akter, J.; Kim, Y.S.; Kim, H.G.; Hahn, J.R.; Kwac, L.K. Highly Efficient and Sustainable ZnO/CuO/g-C3N4 Photocatalyst for Wastewater Treatment under Visible Light through Heterojunction Development. Catalysts 2022, 12, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hanif, M.A.; Akter, J.; Lee, I.; Islam, M.A.; Sapkota, K.P.; Abbas, H.G.; Hahn, J.R. Formation of chemical heterojunctions between ZnO nanoparticles and single walled carbon nanotubes for synergistic enhancement of photocatalytic activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 413, 113260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Inserts represent the size-distribution curves (blue lines) of the respective nanoparticles.
Figure 1. SEM images of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Inserts represent the size-distribution curves (blue lines) of the respective nanoparticles.
Molecules 28 06834 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the synthesized photocatalysts as indicated in the legend.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the synthesized photocatalysts as indicated in the legend.
Molecules 28 06834 g002
Figure 3. TGA traces of the synthesized nanoparticles Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d).
Figure 3. TGA traces of the synthesized nanoparticles Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d).
Molecules 28 06834 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the synthesized photocatalysts as indicated in the legend. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the anatase phase (A) and brookite phase (B) are also indicated.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of the synthesized photocatalysts as indicated in the legend. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the anatase phase (A) and brookite phase (B) are also indicated.
Molecules 28 06834 g004
Figure 5. UV-visible spectra of stable sols (1 mg/10 mL) of the photocatalysts in ethanol, as indicated in the legends.
Figure 5. UV-visible spectra of stable sols (1 mg/10 mL) of the photocatalysts in ethanol, as indicated in the legends.
Molecules 28 06834 g005
Figure 6. UV-visible absorbance data of the model dye solutions (10 mg/L) at various reaction times during photodegradation at 10 °C in a control experiment (without any photocatalyst) under UV-B irradiation: (a) MB, (b) MO.
Figure 6. UV-visible absorbance data of the model dye solutions (10 mg/L) at various reaction times during photodegradation at 10 °C in a control experiment (without any photocatalyst) under UV-B irradiation: (a) MB, (b) MO.
Molecules 28 06834 g006
Figure 7. Effect of the dose of the photocatalyst (Tsgc) on the degradation of MB under UV-B irradiation. 10 mL of a 10 ppm MB solution was irradiated for three hours in the presence of the photocatalyst.
Figure 7. Effect of the dose of the photocatalyst (Tsgc) on the degradation of MB under UV-B irradiation. 10 mL of a 10 ppm MB solution was irradiated for three hours in the presence of the photocatalyst.
Molecules 28 06834 g007
Figure 8. UV-visible absorption spectra of methylene blue before and after adsorption by Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) at ambient temperature (25 °C).
Figure 8. UV-visible absorption spectra of methylene blue before and after adsorption by Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) at ambient temperature (25 °C).
Molecules 28 06834 g008
Figure 9. UV-visible absorption spectra of methyl orange before and after adsorption by Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) at ambient temperature (25 °C).
Figure 9. UV-visible absorption spectra of methyl orange before and after adsorption by Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) at ambient temperature (25 °C).
Molecules 28 06834 g009
Figure 10. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of MB during degradation under UV-B irradiation in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction conditions: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature: 10 °C.
Figure 10. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of MB during degradation under UV-B irradiation in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction conditions: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature: 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g010
Figure 11. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of MO during degradation under UV-B irradiation in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticle = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Figure 11. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solutions of MO during degradation under UV-B irradiation in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticle = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g011
Figure 12. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solution of MB during degradation under dark conditions in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction conditions: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature: 10 °C.
Figure 12. UV-visible absorption spectra of aqueous solution of MB during degradation under dark conditions in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction conditions: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature: 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g012
Figure 13. UV-visible absorption spectra of an aqueous solution of MO during degradation under dark conditions in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticle = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Figure 13. UV-visible absorption spectra of an aqueous solution of MO during degradation under dark conditions in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d). Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L, nanoparticle = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g013
Figure 14. XRD patterns of the nanoparticles (indicated by the legends) recovered after the photocatalytic degradation reaction of MB (a) and MO (b) carried out under UV-B irradiation. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the anatase phase (A) and brookite phase (B) are also indicated. The brookite diffraction peaks indicated by the green color were absent in the fresh photocatalyst.
Figure 14. XRD patterns of the nanoparticles (indicated by the legends) recovered after the photocatalytic degradation reaction of MB (a) and MO (b) carried out under UV-B irradiation. Diffraction peaks corresponding to the anatase phase (A) and brookite phase (B) are also indicated. The brookite diffraction peaks indicated by the green color were absent in the fresh photocatalyst.
Molecules 28 06834 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of the extent of degradation ( r d e g ) of MB and MO dyes in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) under UV-B irradiation. Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L and nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Figure 15. Comparison of the extent of degradation ( r d e g ) of MB and MO dyes in the presence of Tsg (a), Tsgc (b), Tht (c), and Thtc (d) under UV-B irradiation. Reaction parameters: dye = 10 mg/L and nanoparticles = 8 mg/10 mL, temperature = 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g015
Figure 16. Apparent first-order kinetic plots prepared from UV-visible absorption data of the first ninety minutes of photocatalytic degradation of MB and MO under UV-B irradiation in the presence of nanoparticles Tsg (open circles), Tsgc (closed circles), Tht (open triangles), and Thtc (closed triangles) at 10 °C.
Figure 16. Apparent first-order kinetic plots prepared from UV-visible absorption data of the first ninety minutes of photocatalytic degradation of MB and MO under UV-B irradiation in the presence of nanoparticles Tsg (open circles), Tsgc (closed circles), Tht (open triangles), and Thtc (closed triangles) at 10 °C.
Molecules 28 06834 g016
Figure 17. The schematic diagrams for the preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles from titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) by: (a) sol-gel and (b) hydrothermal methods.
Figure 17. The schematic diagrams for the preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles from titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) by: (a) sol-gel and (b) hydrothermal methods.
Molecules 28 06834 g017
Table 1. The degree of crystallinity (λ) and crystal size (l) of the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles.
Table 1. The degree of crystallinity (λ) and crystal size (l) of the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles.
Name of Samplesλ/%l (± Error)/nm
Tsg17.84.39 ± 0.19
Tsgc37.16.19 ± 0.56
Tht31.215.99 ± 0.91
Thtc17.019.88 ± 1.87
Table 2. The degree of crystallinity (λ) and crystal size (l) of the TiO2 nanoparticles recovered after the photocatalytic degradation reactions, calculated from the XRD data. The letters in parenthesis after the name of a nanoparticle represent the name of the dye it degraded by photocatalysis.
Table 2. The degree of crystallinity (λ) and crystal size (l) of the TiO2 nanoparticles recovered after the photocatalytic degradation reactions, calculated from the XRD data. The letters in parenthesis after the name of a nanoparticle represent the name of the dye it degraded by photocatalysis.
Name of Sampleλ/% % Change in λl (±Error)/nm
Tsg (MB)34.2 +924.97 ± 0.65
Tsgc (MB)22.1 −405.98 ± 0.51
Tht (MB)40.9 +3116.00 ± 0.91
Thtc (MB)44.0 +15923.48 ± 1.64
Tsg (MO)34.2 +925.21 ± 0.56
Tsgc (MO)31.5 −156.77 ± 0.52
Tht (MO)29.8 −4.515.83 ± 0.86
Thtc (MO)37.4 +12022.08 ± 1.56
Table 3. The values of the apparent first-order rate constant (k) and the half-life (t1/2) for the degradation of the model dyes MB and MO in the presence of nanoparticles Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc under UV-B irradiation.
Table 3. The values of the apparent first-order rate constant (k) and the half-life (t1/2) for the degradation of the model dyes MB and MO in the presence of nanoparticles Tsg, Tsgc, Tht, and Thtc under UV-B irradiation.
Sample NamekMB × 103/min−1kMO × 103/min−1t1/2(MB)/mint1/2(MO)/min
Tsg3.319.021036.5
Tsgc43.212.016.057.8
Tht29.96.323.2110
Thtc47.78.714.579.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islam, M.T.; Roni, M.N.P.; Ali, M.Y.; Islam, M.R.; Hossan, M.S.; Rahman, M.H.; Zahid, A.A.S.M.; Alam, M.N.E.; Hanif, M.A.; Akhtar, M.S. Selectivity of Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal TiO2 Nanoparticles towards Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic and Anionic Dyes. Molecules 2023, 28, 6834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28196834

AMA Style

Islam MT, Roni MNP, Ali MY, Islam MR, Hossan MS, Rahman MH, Zahid AASM, Alam MNE, Hanif MA, Akhtar MS. Selectivity of Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal TiO2 Nanoparticles towards Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic and Anionic Dyes. Molecules. 2023; 28(19):6834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28196834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islam, Md. Torikul, Md. Nahid Parvez Roni, Md. Yunus Ali, Md. Robiul Islam, Md. Shamim Hossan, M. Habibur Rahman, A. A. S. Mostofa Zahid, Md. Nur E Alam, Md. Abu Hanif, and M. Shaheer Akhtar. 2023. "Selectivity of Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal TiO2 Nanoparticles towards Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic and Anionic Dyes" Molecules 28, no. 19: 6834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28196834

APA Style

Islam, M. T., Roni, M. N. P., Ali, M. Y., Islam, M. R., Hossan, M. S., Rahman, M. H., Zahid, A. A. S. M., Alam, M. N. E., Hanif, M. A., & Akhtar, M. S. (2023). Selectivity of Sol-Gel and Hydrothermal TiO2 Nanoparticles towards Photocatalytic Degradation of Cationic and Anionic Dyes. Molecules, 28(19), 6834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28196834

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop