Next Article in Journal
Aloe-Emodin Overcomes Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance to Temozolomide and Prevents Colony Formation and Migration in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cell Lines NULU and ZAR
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Ablation or Oxidation Mechanisms and Behaviors of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Si-Based Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Flavonoid Compounds in Shanxi Aged Vinegars Based on Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvent VALLME-HPLC Method: Assessment of the Environmental Impact of the Developed Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules28166023
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed by Glycerol and Xylitol, Fructose and Sorbitol: Effect of the Different Sugars in Their Physicochemical Properties

by
Laura Lomba
1,
Álvaro Werner
1,
Beatriz Giner
1,* and
Carlos Lafuente
2
1
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Campus Universitario, Universidad San Jorge, Autov. A23 km 299, Villanueva de Gállego, 50830 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(16), 6023; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166023
Submission received: 14 July 2023 / Revised: 5 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 August 2023 / Published: 11 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The search for new eutectic solvents for different applications (extraction, drug formulation, chemical reactions, etc.) is booming thanks to their high solubility capacity and low toxicity. However, it is necessary to carry out a comprehensive physicochemical characterization of these mixtures to understand the molecular behavior at different experimental conditions. In this study, three deep eutectic solvents (DESs) formed by glycerol and xylitol, fructose and sorbitol and water in the molar ratio 1:2:3 were prepared and several physicochemical properties (refractive index, density, surface tension, viscosity, speed of sound, isobaric heat capacity and isentropic compressibility) were measured and analyzed in the 278.15–338.15 K temperature range. The results indicate a linear dependence with temperature for the following properties: surface tension, refractive index, density and isobaric molar heat capacity while viscosity values have been fitted to the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann equation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

It is well known that solvents play an important role in chemical processes. In addition to fulfilling their primary function (dissolving solid substances in a liquid medium), solvents are used to reduce the viscosity of the system and as reaction media. Furthermore, they can be used for important applications such as extraction or even in the pharmaceutical and food industries [1]. Traditional organic solvents have been used over the years due to their good chemical properties that facilitate the processes in which they are involved; however, there are several disadvantages associated with their use, such as flammability, toxicity, volatile character, or low biodegradability profiles [2]. As a result, there is a growing environmental concern that has led to the search for and development of safer and more sustainable alternatives.
One of these new options which is now at the peak of its popularity is deep eutectic solvents (DESs). First described by Abbott et al. [3], DESs are traditionally formed by a hydrogen acceptor substance (HBA) and a hydrogen donor substance (HBD) [4]. Typical substances acting as HBAs in DESs are betaine, menthol, thymol, choline chloride or lauric acid, among many others [5]. On the other hand, urea, amino acids (serine, glutamate, proline, alanine), amines, alcohols (1,2-propylene glycol, xylitol, glycerol, sorbitol or ethylene glycol), sugars (sucrose, fructose, glucose, lactose, xylose or galactose), amides (benzamide or acetamide) or carboxylic acids (tartaric, lactic, oxalic, malonic, maleic, citric or malic) can be used as HBDs [6,7]. All these raw materials can be of sustainable origin, and then we have the so-called natural deep eutectic solvents, NADESs. One of the most attractive features of these systems is the tunability of their physicochemical properties, which reflect the extent of the strong hydrogen bonding interactions between the molecules [8]. However, these systems are sometimes difficult to work with because NADESs generally have higher viscosity values than traditional solvents due to an increase in the hydrogen bonds formed between the components of the system. However, to reduce the viscosity of this type of system, it is usually possible to change the molar ratio and the temperature, or to add small amounts of water to make the system more manageable [9]. They are also non-flammable, have good chemical and thermal stability and have low volatility and vapor pressure. Finally, although toxicity depends on the HBAs and HBDs used, they are said to be non-toxic to both the environment and human health. All this, together with the possibility of solvent recovery after a certain application, has earned these solvents the “green” label, and NADESs are being widely used under the umbrella of the circular economy. In addition, the nature and versatility of NADESs allow them to be used in a wide range of applications, being better than DESs for co-extract elements from plant materials. This is one of the additional advantages of NADESs. For instance, they have been used to extract different classes of compounds such as phlorotannins [10], steroidal saponins such as borassoside E and protodioscin [11], triterpenoid saponins from Aralia elata var. mandshurica [12], polysaccharides [13], anthocyanins [14], phenyletanes and phenylpropanoids [15]. Furthermore, they can be used in organic synthesis [16,17,18], separation processes [19], biocatalysis [20,21], nanomaterials, biotechnology [6,22], electrochemistry [6,22,23], the food industry [24] or, in the case of the pharmaceutical industry, to increase drug solubility [25,26], used as drug delivery systems [27,28], for the treatment of tuberculosis [29] or for the treatment of rosacea [30].
In this study, a physicochemical characterization of three DESs formed by glycerol and mixed with fructose, xylitol or sorbitol and water in a molar ratio of 1:2:3 (sugar/glycerol/water) was carried out with the aim of analyzing the effect of the sugar on the behavior of the system. In this case, all the components of the eutectic system can act as HBAs and HBDs, as they all have hydrogen donor bonding sites. Several properties such as surface tension, refractive index, viscosity, density and isobaric molar heat capacity were obtained in the temperature range of 278.15–338.15 K and at p = 0.1 MPa. Several derived properties were calculated from experimental data.
The accurate determination of these physical and chemical properties is essential for the development and optimization of technologies, industrial processes and products in various scientific and engineering fields. These properties provide valuable information about the behavior of materials and substances, allowing informed decisions to be made for the advancement of science and technology. Knowing how these systems behave through different physicochemical properties makes it possible to know which systems to choose for each application [31], for example, if one system is better than another for extracting or separating certain compounds, or even if it has better properties for use in the biomedical field, such as enhancing drug solubility.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preparation of DES

The studied deep eutectic solvents formed a transparent homogeneous solution, which remained as it was over time, with no precipitate appreciation at any of the studied temperatures.

2.2. Thermophysical Properties

Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials shows experimental measured and calculated data of the studied properties. This information is graphically shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.
The relationship between the experimental data obtained for each property and the temperature was also obtained. A linear dependence with the temperature was observed for the following properties: refractive index, speed of sound, surface tension, density and isobaric molar heat capacity. The experimental data were correlated with the following linear equation:
y = A T + B
where Y is the corresponding property and A and B are adjustable parameters.
The Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann equation was used to fit dynamic viscosity values [32,33,34]:
η = η 0 e B ( T − T 0 )
where η0, B and T0 are the fitting parameters.
Table 1 shows the fitting parameters for these fittings and the corresponding standard deviations, Syx, between the experimental and calculated values for each studied property. Standard deviations, Syx, were calculated using the next mathematical expression:
S y x = ∑ y i e x p − y i c a l 2 n − k 1 / 2
where k is the number of parameters fit by regression and n-k is the number of degrees of freedom of the regression.
The statistical study showed that for all the properties measured at 298.15 K, there were significant differences between the different systems with p < 0.0001 values.
From the chemical industry point of view, density is a very important basic feature for the evaluation not only of containers, the diameter of columns in industrial processes, etc., but also because density gives information about the purity of the chemicals, the interactions that are formed between the molecules that form the chemical system and the molecular structure in terms of the volume occupied by the molecules and free volume [31]. This parameter is essential in the extraction processes because it affects the kinetic rate and the driving forces between the solvents and the solid particles [35], or, in pharmaceutical formulations, provides critical information about the physical properties of drug substances and their formulations. This information can be used to optimize drug dosage, ensure physical stability and detect the presence of counterfeit or substandard drugs [36].
As it is well known, density values decrease as the temperature increases since volume increases with temperature. In this study, the highest values of density are found for FruGW followed by SorGW and XylGW. Concretely, at T = 298.15 K, density values are 1275.22 kg·m−3 for XylG, 1329.61 kg·m−3 for FruGW and 1300.25 kg·m−3 for SorGW. Density is affected by several factors such as the nature of the components forming the DES or composition [37]. The molecular organization and interactions between components of the mixture also play an important role in this property. Singh et al. prepared several DESs formed by choline chloride (ChCl) and polyethylene glycol 600 (PEG600) with glycerol at different molar ratios. The results then indicated that the density values of the studied DESs decrease with the presence of HBAs with respect to glycerol which presents a density value of 1253 kg·m3 at T = 298.15 K. This trend is the opposite of what we observed in our study, with the density of the DESs being higher than pure glycerol [38]. It is also noticeable that the density of the DESs containing sugars is higher than glyceline, a DES formed by ChCl and glycerol [39]. However, the values for this property are in the range of 1–1.3 kg·m3 according to literature data [40].
The molar volumes at T = 298.15 K for the studied DESs are 51.021, 52.445 and 53.881 cm3·mol−1 for XylGW, FruGW and SorGW, respectively. The molar volume values at low temperatures are lower since the average size of the holes created among the molecules is smaller at low temperatures, and therefore the density increases.
One of the key properties required for the use of fluids in engineering applications is the isobaric expansivity αp which determines the temperature change in the volume V at constant pressure p. Thermal expansion is related to the asymmetry of the interatomic interactions so that the repulsive force grows faster than the attractive force. Upon transition to the liquid state, the bulk thermal expansion increases sharply [41].
The calculated isobaric expansivities, αp, for the studied DESs are 0.514, 0.537 and 0.498 kK−1 at T = 298.15 K for XylGW, FruGW and SorGW, respectively. These values are in the same range as other DESs published by Jafari et al. where they studied DESs formed by ChCl and ethylene glycol (ChCl:EG) at 1:2 and 1:5 molar ratios and mixtures with water (ChCl:EG:W) at 1:2:2 and 1:5:2. In this study, the values of this property were 0.499 for ChCl:EG (1:2) and 0.540 for ChCl:EG (1:5); when water is introduced into the system, the value of, αp, remains constant for (ChCl:EG:W) at 1:2:2 but increases in the case of (ChCl:EG:W) at 1:5:2 being 0.543 [42]. In the case of the binary system formed by choline chloride and glycerol (1:1.99), the value was 0.466, and with the inclusion of water, it was (1: 1.99:1.02) 0.465 kK−1 [39]. In the case of the work presented by Leron et al., this property is shown at 298.15 K for glyceline, and its value is 0.497 kK−1 [43].
The refractive index is a volumetric property that provides complementary information to density. For instance, one of the main uses of refractive index measurements in pharmaceutical formulation is to determine the purity and concentration of drug substances [44]. In addition, refractive index measurements can be used to monitor the physical stability of pharmaceutical formulations [45]. Changes in refractive index can indicate the formation of crystals or other solid phases that may affect the efficacy and safety of the drug.
As expected, when the temperature increases, refractive index values decrease and molar refraction values increase, both properties through a linear dependence. For the studied DESs, the highest values for the refractive index are found for FruGW followed by SorGW and XylGW, whereas for molar refraction, the trend is the following: SorGW > FruGW > XylGW. The property molar refraction is usually related to the hardcore volume of the thermodynamic system bulk. Thus, the free molar volume, i.e., the unoccupied volume, can also be calculated from the molar refraction and molar volume. In this case, the molar free volumes at T = 298.15 K are 36.887, 37.587 and 38.713 cm3·mol−1 for XylGW, FruGW and SorGW, respectively.
Another important physicochemical property for many industrial processes is surface tension, σ. It is a measure of the energy required to increase the surface area of a liquid by a given amount (the force that holds the molecules of a liquid together and prevents them from separating or spreading apart); this property therefore reflects the molecular attraction and interaction in the system [46]. An important aspect for many industrial processes is surface tension, σ. It is used to calculate the fluid flow for design equipment in mixing and separation processes [31]. This property depends on the intermolecular forces acting in the bulk phase compared to those presented on the surface. The surface tension decreases as the temperature increases because of the diminution in these bulk forces. That is, the higher the surface tension, the stronger the intermolecular interactions. For the studied DESs, the highest values of surface tension are found for SorGW, followed by FruGW and XylGW. The values obtained for this property are within the ranges found in the literature, which usually fluctuate between 35 and 75 mN·m−1 [40]. Furthermore, it has been shown in the literature that the surface tension values for sugar-based DESs, such as those formed by choline chloride and fructose [24] or choline chloride and glucose [47], are high due to the intermolecular interactions involved.
The studied volumetric properties also reflect the observed intensity of the intermolecular interactions, with a higher free volume when interactions are smaller (XylGW). The entropy, ΔSs, and enthalpy, ΔHs, of surface formation per unit surface area give information about the molecular distribution at the surface. In this case, the linear relationship between temperature and surface tension makes ΔSs constant, the calculated values being equal to 0.2159, 0.2436 and 0.3916 mN·m−1·K−1 for XylGW, FruGW, and SorGW, respectively. At T = 298.15 K, the calculated ΔHs values are 120.61, 129.86 and 178.61 mN·m−1 for XylGW, FruGW and SorGW, respectively. The orientation degree in the surface is indicated by low values of enthalpy and entropy of surface formation. Thus, XylGW seems to be the moiety with a higher surface orientation degree.
In Figure 2, the speed of sound and isentropic compressibility as a function of temperature are shown. The speed of sound is a quite useful property used in some applications such as the development of equations of state constants, bulk modulus, heat capacity or Joule–Thomson coefficient, among others [48]. The speed of sound is related to the efficiency of molecular packing. Substances that present higher speed of sound values are packed more effectively at a molecular level. In this case, the observed behavior of the speed of sound follows the typical inverse relation with temperature, and experimental values decrease when the temperature increases. Clearly, the speed of sound values for XylGW are lower than those for FruGW and SorGW.
Some important information about the internal organization of the eutectic mixture can be obtained through isentropic compressibility. High values of this property indicate that the chemical structure is less packed. In this case, the isentropic compressibility values increase as the temperature does. For the studied DESs, the highest values are found for XylGW followed by SorGW and FruGW.
The isobaric molar heat capacity, Cp,m, is directly related to the heat transfer. This property increases as the temperature does. Higher values are found for SorGW followed by FruGW and XylGW.
Finally, the fluidity of the studied DESs has been obtained through kinematic viscosity, ν. Using experimental density values, the dynamic viscosity property, η, was obtained. Viscosity is a transport property that describes the internal resistance of a fluid to shear stress [49]. It is a mole- and temperature-dependent property. It is important to establish a viscosity database as this property is directly related to fluid flow calculations and equipment design. With these data at the design stage, the DES compound can be designed to achieve lower viscosity values [50].
Most of the deep eutectic solvents reported so far are highly viscous at room temperature (η > 100 mPa·s), which is mainly due to the extensive hydrogen bonding network between the components of the deep components of eutectic solvents. They also exhibit a wide viscosity range [40]. In the case of the studied DESs, the dynamic viscosity presents values in the range of 100–4000 mPa·s at the studied temperatures. The dependency of viscosity with the temperature, water content, nature of its components and molar ratio in the DESs has been previously studied [40]. In this case, the highest values for dynamic viscosity are found for FruGW followed by SorGW and XylGW. These viscosity values are quite high compared to other DES-containing glycerols such as glyceline (ChCl + glycerol 1:2) or ChCl + PEG600 + glycerol (1:3:2, 1:4:2 and 1:5:2) with dynamic viscosity values between 100 and 700 mPa·s [38,39] at the same temperature range as the measurements of the present work. This is significant since the DESs studied in this work contain water, which translates into a reduction in viscosity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Some information on the pure components used in this work is gathered in Table 2. Chemical structures are presented in Figure 4. The chemicals were dried under vacuum for 24 h prior to use.
These components were chosen because they are common compounds in the pharmaceutical industry and it may be of interest to know how these systems behave so that they can be used in the future as drug delivery vehicles, for example via the transdermal or rectal routes.

3.2. Preparation of Deep Eutectic Solvents

In this study, 50 mL of three DESs were prepared. Briefly, components for each system were weighed using a Sartorius Entris 5201-1S balance (uncertainty ± 10−1 g) and introduced into a jar with constant stirring and heating in a water bath at 60–70 °C until a mixture of transparent and homogeneous appearance was obtained [25]. In order to avoid water uptake and to ensure the ratio, the properties were measured as soon as the compounds were prepared.
Table 3 shows all the initially prepared systems. It can be seen that all the analyzed systems were liquid at room temperature and 4 °C, so a decrease in melting temperature was observed. The mixtures were very viscous and difficult to work with; it was decided to add water to make them easier to handle. Of all the ternary systems containing water, those marked with an asterisk* were selected to be studied in depth because they were less viscous than the others. Therefore, DESs formed via the combination of xylitol, fructose and sorbitol with glycerol and water in the molar ratio 1:2:3 have been studied. Once the compounds were prepared, the properties were measured.
Information related to the composition (molar ratio) and the final molar mass of the mixture can be found in Table 4. The molar mass of each mixture was calculated using the following equation:
MWDES = Xglycerol·MWglycerol + XSugar ·MWSugar + Xwater·MWwater.
where X is the mole fraction and MW is the molar mass.

3.3. Thermophysical Properties

Some physicochemical properties such as the refractive index, the speed of sound, the density, the viscosity, the surface tension and the isobaric molar heat capacity were obtained. All the values were measured in 2.5 K intervals in the range of temperatures (278.15–338.15). Several derived properties (isentropic compressibility, enthalpy of surface formation and entropy of surface formation and isobaric expansivity) were also calculated from the raw experimental data. All properties were measured in triplicate (n = 3).
An Anton Paar DSA 5000 vibrating tube sound analyzer and densimeter (3 MHz) was used to simultaneously measure the density, ρ, and speed of sound, u, of the studied DESs. Dry air and ultrapure water (SH Calibration Service GmbH) were used for calibrating the equipment. The temperature was controlled internally, with an uncertainty of 0.005 K. The uncertainty of the measurements is the following: for the speed of sound, 0.5 m·s−1, and for density measurements, 0.1 kg·m−3. The isobaric expansivity, αp, was calculated as follows: α P = − 1 / ρ d ρ / d T P , while the isentropic compressibility, κs, can be calculated as κ s = 1 / ( ρ u 2 ) , assuming that the ultrasonic absorption is zero.
The Abbemat-HP refractometer Dr Kernchen was used for measuring the refractive indices, nD (sodium D wavelength 589.3 nm) whose temperature was internally controlled (±0.01 K), the uncertainty in the measurement being 5·10−5. The molar refraction, Rm, was also calculated: R m = M ( n D 2 − 1 ) / ( ρ n D 2 + 1 ) .
A Lauda TVT-2 drop volume tensiometer was used to measure the surface tensions, σ, of the studied DESs. The temperature was controlled with a Lauda E-200 thermostat (±0.01 K). The uncertainty of the measurement in this case is 0.2 mN·m−1. In order to obtain information about the molecular distribution in the surface, both the entropy, ΔSs, and enthalpy, ΔHs, of the surface formation per unit surface area were calculated using Δ S s = − ( d σ / d T ) P and Δ H s = σ − T ( d σ / d T ) P , respectively.
TA Instruments Q2000 differential scanning equipment was used to obtain experimental isobaric molar heat capacities, Cp,m, with an uncertainty of 1%.
The kinematic viscosities, ν, were measured with Schoot-GeräteAVS-440 equipment and Ubbelohde capillary viscosimeters, applying kinetic corrections. The uncertainty for this property is 0.01 s, and the temperature was controlled using a thermostat model Schoot-Geräte CT 1150/2 ± 0.01 K. The dynamic viscosity, η, was calculated from experimental kinematic viscosity data, η = ρ ν , with 1% uncertainty.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted utilizing GraphPad Prism 9.0 software, employing the one-way ANOVA method and the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant differences model. The null hypothesis (H0) posits that there are no significant differences among the groups, and, therefore, they are equal. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis (H1) assumes that there are differences between the groups. A confidence level of 95% was chosen, implying that if the p-value was less than 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternative hypothesis was accepted.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the preparation and complete thermophysical characterization of three DESs formed by sugar (xylitol, fructose and sorbitol), glycerol and water in the molar ratio of 1:2:3 were carried out. The experimental values of density, refractive index, the speed of sound, surface tension, isobaric molar heat capacity and kinematic viscosities were obtained in the range of temperatures (278.15–338.15) K at atmospheric pressure. Additionally, the derived properties such as molar refraction, isentropic compressibility and dynamic viscosities were calculated. For these DESs, a linear dependence between property and temperature was obtained for density, refractive index, molar refraction, surface tension and isobaric heat capacity. However, this relation was polynomial for the case of the speed of sound and temperature. For the eutectic systems studied, density data ranging from 1312.62–1248.78 kg·m−3 were obtained, depending on the temperature analyzed, and the system that presented the highest values was FruGW. In the case of isobaric expansivity, αp, the values varied between 0.498 and 0.537 kK−1 at 298.15 K. These values are similar to those obtained by other DESs containing glycerol in their systems.
The range of refractive index values found for these systems varies between 1.456012 and 1.482363, with FruGW being the one with the highest values. Surface tension, which is a very important property in industrial processes, is directly related to the intermolecular forces of mixtures [51]. In this case, these forces are much stronger for the system formed by sorbitol (SorGW) and weaker for that formed by xylitol (XylGW). In addition to analyzing the internal organization of the DESs through isentropic compressibility, it was observed that the one with the highest values is XylGW, indicating that its chemical structure is more compact than the other two systems.
In terms of Cp,m, it was observed that the DES with sorbitol (SorGW) provided the highest heat transfer.
Finally, in the case of dynamic viscosity, the values were fitted to a Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann equation. It is important to note that all have high viscosity values, with FruGW and SorGW being more viscous than XylGW.
Deep eutectic solvents with higher density and refractive index values such as those of this study containing sorbitol could be used for the extraction of heavy metals [52]. With regard to the processing of lignocellulosic mass, it is generally known that a better penetration into the delignified raw material is achieved if the used solvent shows a lower density and viscosity [53]. Viscosity is also an important property related to some industrial applications of DESs [47].
On the other hand, solvents with lower values of density and refractive index, such as those containing xylitol, could be more easily used for the development of liquid or semisolid pharmaceutical and cosmetic forms [54]. This type of solvent could also be used in the food industry as texture agents and stabilizers [55].
With regard to industrial applications, isobaric molar heat capacity, Cp,m, assumes importance (temperature control, optimizing reaction kinetics, energy efficiency, reaction rates, aids predictive modeling, drying and cooling processes and guides thermal energy storage systems). DESs with greater Cp,m, such as sorbitol ones, could find utility in endothermic and chemical reaction processes thanks to their capacity to absorb and retain heat, thus enhancing their reaction efficiency and control [56]. Furthermore, these DESs could be harnessed for heat storage systems and refrigeration/climatization technologies, effectively absorbing and releasing heat, thereby contributing to efficient thermal energy conservation and controlled dissemination. On the other hand, DESs with lower Cp,m could optimize exothermic reactions, offer robust cooling in refrigeration, accelerate freezing in food production, and efficiently manage heat in thermal storage, including solar energy contexts [57].
In general, DESs with higher viscosity values can also be used as efficient lubricants in machinery, particularly under high-stress conditions [58]. On the contrary, if the viscosity is lower, their industrial applications could be solvent extraction and reaction solvents, facilitating better mixing and heat transfer in chemical reactions. In the field of coatings and inks, DESs with lower viscosities can provide improved spreading and coating uniformity [59].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28166023/s1, Table S1. Experimental and some derived thermophysical properties of deep eutectic solvents as a function of the temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 MPa.

Author Contributions

L.L.: Writing—original draft, Supervision. Á.W.: Investigation. B.G.: Formal analysis, Validation. C.L.: Investigation, Validation, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Diputación General de Aragón and Fondo Social Europeo “Construyendo Europa desde Aragón (E31_23R)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

On request.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank Universidad San Jorge for their financial support (call for internal projects 2023). Alvaro thanks the research program of the National Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, which is financed through financial resources derived from the European Recovery Instrument (“Next Generation EU”) through the Recovery and Resilience Mechanism. (BOA, ORDEN EPE/1891/2021, de 30 de diciembre). Carlos Lafuente gratefully acknowledges, the financial assistance from Diputación General de Aragón and Fondo Social Europeo “Construyendo Europa desde Aragón” (E31_23R).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Sample Availability

Not available.

References

  1. Biernacki, K.; Souza, H.K.S.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Magalhaes, A.L.; Goncalves, M.P. Physicochemical Properties of Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents with Polyols: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18712–18728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clarke, C.J.; Tu, W.C.; Levers, O.; Brohl, A.; Hallett, J.P. Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K.; Tambyrajah, V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem. Commun. 2003, 39, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Atilhan, M.; Costa, L.T.; Aparicio, S. On the behaviour of aqueous solutions of deep eutectic solvents at lipid biomembranes. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 247, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Florindo, C.; Branco, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Quest for Green-Solvent Design: From Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic (Deep) Eutectic Solvents. Chemsuschem 2019, 12, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Their Applications in Biotechnology. Appl. Ion. Liq. Biotechnol. 2019, 168, 31–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huerta Ochoa, S.; Castillo Araiza, C.O.; Quijano, G. Advances and Applications of Partitioning Bioreactors. Adv. Appl. Partit. Bioreact. 2019, 54, 1–371. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sekharan, T.R.; Chandira, R.M.; Tamilvanan, S.; Rajesh, S.C.; Venkateswarlu, B.S. Deep Eutectic Solvents as an Alternate to Other Harmful Solvents. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lorenzetti, A.S.; Fiego, M.J.L.; Silva, M.F.; Domini, C.; Gomez, F.J.V. Water behavior study for tailoring fructose-citric acid based natural deep eutectic solvent properties towards antibiotics solubilization. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 363, 119917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Obluchinskaya, E.D.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Shevyrin, V.A.; Kovaleva, E.G.; Flisyuk, E.V.; Shikov, A.N. Optimization of Extraction of Phlorotannins from the Arctic Fucus vesiculosus Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Their HPLC Profiling with Tandem High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Suresh, P.S.; Singh, P.P.; Kapoor, S.; Padwad, Y.S.; Sharma, U.; Anmol, U. Lactic acid-based deep eutectic solvent: An efficient green media for the selective extraction of steroidal saponins from Trillium govanianum. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 294, 121105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petrochenko, A.A.; Orlova, A.; Frolova, N.; Serebryakov, E.B.; Soboleva, A.; Flisyuk, E.V.; Frolov, A.; Shikov, A.N. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Extraction of Triterpene Saponins from Aralia elata var. mandshurica (Rupr. & Maxim.) J. Wen. Molecules 2023, 28, 3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, N.; Li, Q. Study on extraction and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Radix Bupleuri by natural deep eutectic solvents combined with ultrasound-assisted enzymolysis. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 30, 100877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, X.; Wang, D.; Belwal, T.; Xie, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, L.; Zou, L.; Zhang, L.; Luo, Z. Natural deep eutectic solvent enhanced pulse-ultrasonication assisted extraction as a multi-stability protective and efficient green strategy to extract anthocyanin from blueberry pomace. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 144, 111220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shikov, A.N.; Kosman, V.M.; Flissyuk, E.V.; Smekhova, I.E.; Elameen, A.; Pozharitskaya, O.N. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Extraction of Phenyletanes and Phenylpropanoids of Rhodiola rosea L. Molecules 2020, 25, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, T.; Doert, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, S.J.; Ruck, M. Inorganic Synthesis Based on Reactions of Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22148–22165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Devi, T.J.; Singh, T.P.; Singh, O.M. The one-pot four-component eco-friendly synthesis of spirooxindoles in deep eutectic solvent. J. Chem. Sci. 2020, 132, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Perrone, S.; Messa, F.; Troisi, L.; Salomone, A. N-, O- and S-Heterocycles Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Molecules 2023, 28, 3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, R.T.; Pei, D.; Yu, P.L.; Wei, J.T.; Wang, N.L.; Di, D.L.; Liu, Y.W. Aqueous two-phase systems based on deep eutectic solvents and their application in green separation processes. J. Sep. Sci. 2020, 43, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghobadi, R.; Divsalar, A. Enzymatic behavior of bovine liver catalase in aqueous medium of sugar based deep eutectic solvents. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 310, 113207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taklimi, S.M.; Divsalar, A.; Ghalandari, B.; Ding, X.T.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Omar, K.A.; Saboury, A.A. Effects of deep eutectic solvents on the activity and stability of enzymes. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 377, 121562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Svigelj, R.; Dossi, N.; Grazioli, C.; Toniolo, R. Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Application in Biosensor Development. Sensors 2021, 21, 4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, H.M.; Li, M.R.; Garg, S.; Wu, Y.M.; Idros, M.N.; Hocking, R.; Duan, H.R.; Gao, S.; Yago, A.J.; Zhuang, L.Z.; et al. Cobalt Electrochemical Recovery from Lithium Cobalt Oxides in Deep Eutectic Choline Chloride plus Urea Solvents. Chemsuschem 2021, 14, 2972–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hayyan, A.; Mjalli, F.S.; AlNashef, I.M.; Al-Wahaibi, T.; Al-Wahaibi, Y.M.; Hashim, M.A. Fruit sugar-based deep eutectic solvents and their physical properties. Thermochim. Acta 2012, 541, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lomba, L.; Polo, A.; Alejandre, J.; Martinez, N.; Giner, B. Solubility enhancement of caffeine and furosemide using deep eutectic solvents formed by choline chloride and xylitol, citric acid, sorbitol or glucose. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 79, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lomba, L.; Garralaga, M.P.; Werner, A.; Giner, B.; Baptista, P.M.; Sánchez-Romero, N. Ibuprofen solubility and cytotoxic study of deep eutectic solvents formed by xylitol, choline chloride and water. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023, 82, 104327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Basu, M.; Hassan, P.A.; Shelar, S.B. Modulation of surfactant self-assembly in deep eutectic solvents and its relevance to drug delivery—A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 375, 121301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Araki, Y.; Hamada, Y.; Imamura, N.; Yamasaka, K.; Sakuragi, M. Evaluation of terpene-based hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as skin permeation enhancers. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2023, 62, 15003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santos, F.; Leitao, M.I.P.S.; Duarte, A.R.C. Properties of Therapeutic Deep Eutectic Solvents of L-Arginine and Ethambutol for Tuberculosis Treatment. Molecules 2019, 24, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ko, J.; Mandal, A.; Dhawan, S.; Shevachman, M.; Mitragotri, S.; Joshi, N. Clinical translation of choline and geranic acid deep eutectic solvent. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2021, 6, e10191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.Y.L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Wu, K.J.; Zhu, Y.M.; Lu, H.F.; Liang, B. Insights into the relationships between physicochemical properties, solvent performance, and applications of deep eutectic solvents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 35537–35563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vogel, D.H. Das Temperaturabhaengigkeitsgesetz der Viskositaet von Fluessigkeiten. Phys. Z. 1921, 22, 645–646. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fulcher, G.S. Analysis of recent measurements of the viscosity of glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1925, 8, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tammann, G.W.H. Die Abhängigkeit der Viscosität von der Temperatur bie unterkühlten Flüssigkeiten. Z. Für Anorg. Und Allg. Chem. 1926, 156, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdallah, M.M.; Cardeira, M.; Matias, A.A.; Bronze, M.R.; Fernandez, N. Lactic Acid-Based Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents to Extract Bioactives from Marine By-Products. Molecules 2022, 27, 4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kovacs, S.; Hawes, S.E.; Maley, S.N.; Mosites, E.; Wong, L.; Stergachis, A. Technologies for Detecting Falsified and Substandard Drugs in Low and Middle-Income Countries. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Garcia, G.; Aparicio, S.; Ullah, R.; Atilhan, M. Deep Eutectic Solvents: Physicochemical Properties and Gas Separation Applications. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 2616–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singh, A.; Walvekar, R.; Khalid, M.; Wong, W.Y.; Gupta, T. Thermophysical properties of glycerol and polyethylene glycol (PEG 600) based DES. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 252, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lapena, D.; Lomba, L.; Artal, M.; Lafuente, C.; Giner, B. The NADES glyceline as a potential Green Solvent: A comprehensive study of its thermophysical properties and effect of water inclusion. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019, 128, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. El Achkar, T.; Greige-Gerges, H.; Fourmentin, S. Basics and properties of deep eutectic solvents: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3397–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Starodubtsev, Y.N.; Tsepelev, V.S. Isobaric Thermal Expansivity and Isothermal Compressibility of Liquid Metals. Materials 2023, 16, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jafari, K.; Fatemi, M.H.; Lugo, L. An experimental study of novel nanofluids based on deep eutectic solvents (DESs) by Choline chloride and ethylene glycol. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 360, 119521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Leron, R.B.; Wong, D.S.H.; Li, M.H. Densities of a deep eutectic solvent based on choline chloride and glycerol and its aqueous mixtures at elevated pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2012, 335, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mohan, S.; Kato, E.; Drennen, J.K.; Anderson, C.A. Refractive Index Measurement of Pharmaceutical Solids: A Review of Measurement Methods and Pharmaceutical Applications. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 108, 3478–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Al-Sanea, M.M.; Gamal, M. Critical analytical review: Rare and recent applications of refractive index detector in HPLC chromatographic drug analysis. Microchem. J. 2022, 178, 107339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Singh, S. Studies on the Interactions of Paracetamol in Water and Binary Solvent Mixtures at T = (298.15-313.15) K: Viscometric and Surface Tension Approach. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 2776–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hayyan, A.; Mjalli, F.S.; AlNashef, I.M.; Al-Wahaibi, Y.M.; Al-Wahaibi, T.; Hashim, M.A. Glucose-based deep eutectic solvents: Physical properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2013, 178, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peyrovedin, H.; Haghbakhsh, R.; Duarte, A.R.C.; Raeissi, S. A Global Model for the Estimation of Speeds of Sound in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Molecules 2020, 25, 1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ferraro, C.F. Organic solvents: Physical properties and methods of purification. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1956, 61, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kadhom, M.A.; Abdullah, G.H.; Al-Bayati, N. Studying Two Series of Ternary Deep Eutectic Solvents (Choline Chloride-Urea-Glycerol) and (Choline Chloride-Malic Acid-Glycerol), Synthesis and Characterizations. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oroian, M.; Ropciuc, S.; Amariei, S.; Gutt, G. Correlations between density, viscosity, surface tension and ultrasonic velocity of different mono- and di-saccharides. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 207, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wazeer, I.; Hizaddin, H.F.; Hashim, M.A.; Hadj-Kali, M.K. An overview about the extraction of heavy metals and other critical pollutants from contaminated water via hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Majova, V.; Jablonsky, M.; Lelovsky, M. Delignification of unbleached pulp by ternary deep eutectic solvents. Green Process. Synth. 2021, 10, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rajabi, M.; Ghassab, N.; Hemmati, M.; Asghari, A. Emulsification microextraction of amphetamine and methamphetamine in complex matrices using an up-to-date generation of eco-friendly and relatively hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1576, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ngasotter, S.; Sampath, L.; Xavier, K.A.M. Nanochitin: An update review on advances in preparation methods and food applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Faraji, S.; Shekaari, H.; Zafarani-Moattar, M.T.; Mokhtarpour, M. Experimental studies on thermophysical properties of protic ionic liquids for thermal energy storage systems. J. Energy Storage 2022, 54, 105251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bo, L.; Zhang, X.J.; Luo, Z.M.; Saboori, T.; Dehghan, M.; Ghasemizadeh, M.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Alagumalai, A.; Mahian, O. An overview of the applications of ionic fluids and deep eutectic solvents enhanced by nanoparticles. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 7589–7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Walvekar, R.; Singh, A.; Khalid, M.; Gupta, T.; Yin, W.W. Thermophysical properties of deep eutectic solvent-carbon nanotubes (DES-CNT) based nanolubricant. J. Therm. Eng. 2020, 6, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, S.G.; Ji, R.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Zhang, F.; Jin, H.; Li, X.F.; Zheng, Q.; Lu, S.C.; Cai, B.P. Effects of boric acid and water on the deposition of Ni/TiO2 composite coatings from deep eutectic solvent. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2021, 409, 126834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 06023 g001
Figure 1. Density, ρ, refractive index, nD, molar refraction, Rm, and surface tension, σ, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 MPa for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Figure 1. Density, ρ, refractive index, nD, molar refraction, Rm, and surface tension, σ, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 MPa for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Molecules 28 06023 g001
Molecules 28 06023 g002
Figure 2. Speed of sound, u, and isentropic compressibility, κS, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 MPa for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Figure 2. Speed of sound, u, and isentropic compressibility, κS, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 MPa for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Molecules 28 06023 g002
Molecules 28 06023 g003
Figure 3. Isobaric molar heat capacity, Cp,m, and dynamic viscosity, η, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Figure 3. Isobaric molar heat capacity, Cp,m, and dynamic viscosity, η, as a function of temperature, T, at atmospheric pressure, p = 0.1 for the studied compounds: xylitol: glycerol: water (●) experimental; fructose: glycerol: water (■) experimental; sorbitol: glycerol: water (▲) experimental; (____) correlated values.
Molecules 28 06023 g003
Molecules 28 06023 g004
Figure 4. Chemical structures of the components of DESs.
Figure 4. Chemical structures of the components of DESs.
Molecules 28 06023 g004
Table 1. Fitting parameters, A, B and C, for the correlation equations and their corresponding standard deviations, Syx.
Table 1. Fitting parameters, A, B and C, for the correlation equations and their corresponding standard deviations, Syx.
PropertyABCSyx
Xylitol: glycerol: water (1:2:3)
ρ/(kg·m−3)−0.64881468.51 0.182
u/(m·s−1)−2.1842612.57 0.291
nD−0.0002481.540010 10 × 10−5
σ/(mN·m−1)−0.2159120.47 0.115
Cp,m/(J·mol−1·K−1)0.30364.4 0.097
η a/(mPa·s)0.006781424.4164.874.884
Fructose: glycerol: water (1:2:3)
ρ/(kg·m−3)−0.70561539.80 0.251
u/(m·s−1)−2.5052733.67 0.481
nD−0.0002731.559727 13 × 10−5
σ/(mN·m−1)−0.2436130.01 0.187
Cp,m/(J·mol−1·K−1)0.46221.9 0.126
η a/(mPa·s)0.000332332.3139.535.980
Sorbitol: glycerol: water (1:2:3)
ρ/(kg·m−3)−0.64121491.30 0.187
u/(m·s−1)−2.3052681.22 0.334
nD−0.0002531.550538 5 × 10−5
σ/(mN·m−1)−0.3916174.78 0.181
Cp,m/(J·mol−1·K−1)0.32372.1 0.130
η a/(mPa·s)0.003401692.9160.208.076
a A = η0; C = T0. Density, ρ, speed of sound, u,refractive index, nD, surface tension, σ, isobaric molar heat capacity, Cp,m, dynamic viscosity, η.
Table 2. Information on the pure chemicals used in this study.
Table 2. Information on the pure chemicals used in this study.
ChemicalCAS NumberFormulaSupplierPurity (Mass Fraction)
Xylitol87-99-0C5H12O5Fagron Iberica, Zaragoza, Spain0.997
Fructose 57-48-7C6H12O6Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany0.999
Sorbitol50-70-4C6H14O6Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany0.990
Glycerol56-81-5HOCH2CH(OH)CH2OHSigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany0.999
Table 3. Composition, molar ratio, and physical appearance of the prepared DESs.
Table 3. Composition, molar ratio, and physical appearance of the prepared DESs.
DESRatioPhysical Appearance
Xylitol:glycerol1:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol 1:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol1:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol1:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol 1:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol1:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water1:3:1Transparent, very viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water1:3:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water1:3:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water1:3:1Transparent, very viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water1:3:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water1:3:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water1:3:1Transparent, very viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water1:3:2Transparent, very viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water1:3:3Transparent, very viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water1:2:1Transparent, viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water1:2:2Transparent, viscous liquid
Xylitol:glycerol: water *1:2:3Transparent, slightly viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water1:2:1Transparent, viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water1:2:2Transparent, viscous liquid
Fructose:glycerol:water *1:2:3Transparent, slightly viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water1:2:1Transparent, viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water1:2:2Transparent, viscous liquid
Sorbitol:glycerol:water *1:2:3Transparent, slightly viscous liquid
Table 4. Deep eutectic systems: abbreviation, molar ratio and molar mass.
Table 4. Deep eutectic systems: abbreviation, molar ratio and molar mass.
DESAbbreviationMolar RatioMolar Mass (g·mol−1)
Xylitol: glycerol: waterXylGW1:2:365.063
Fructose: glycerol: waterFruGW1:2:369.732
Sorbitol: glycerol: waterSorGW1:2:370.068
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lomba, L.; Werner, Á.; Giner, B.; Lafuente, C. Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed by Glycerol and Xylitol, Fructose and Sorbitol: Effect of the Different Sugars in Their Physicochemical Properties. Molecules 2023, 28, 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166023

AMA Style

Lomba L, Werner Á, Giner B, Lafuente C. Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed by Glycerol and Xylitol, Fructose and Sorbitol: Effect of the Different Sugars in Their Physicochemical Properties. Molecules. 2023; 28(16):6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lomba, Laura, Álvaro Werner, Beatriz Giner, and Carlos Lafuente. 2023. "Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed by Glycerol and Xylitol, Fructose and Sorbitol: Effect of the Different Sugars in Their Physicochemical Properties" Molecules 28, no. 16: 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166023

APA Style

Lomba, L., Werner, Á., Giner, B., & Lafuente, C. (2023). Deep Eutectic Solvents Formed by Glycerol and Xylitol, Fructose and Sorbitol: Effect of the Different Sugars in Their Physicochemical Properties. Molecules, 28(16), 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop