Next Article in Journal
Domino Aldol-SNAr-Dehydration Sequence for [3+3] Annulations to Prepare Quinolin-2(1H)-ones and 1,8-Naphthyridin-2(1H)-ones
Previous Article in Journal
A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe Based on RhB Functionalized Tb-MOFs for the Continuous Visual Detection of Fe3+ and AA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress on Structural Modification of Effective Antitumor Active Ingredients in Licorice

College of Chinese Medicinal Material, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Street, Changchun 130118, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(15), 5855; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155855
Submission received: 8 July 2023 / Revised: 29 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 August 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023

Abstract

:
Licorice, a widely used traditional Chinese medicine, contains more than 300 flavonoids and more than 20 triterpenoids, which have potential medicinal value and can prevent the growth of tumor cells by blocking the cell cycle, affecting the regulation of the apoptosis gene of tumor cells, and inhibiting tumor cell angiogenesis. However, many of the compounds in licorice still have the drawbacks of poor solubility, significant toxic side effects, and low antitumor activity. This article reviews the structural modification of effective antitumor active ingredients in licorice, thus providing a theoretical basis for further investigation of licorice and the development of new antitumor drugs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A serious condition that endangers human health is cancer. Licorice is the dried root and rhizome of the legumes Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch., Glycyrrhiza inflata Bat., and Glycyrrhiza glabra L. [1], which has the effect of tonifying the spleen and invigorating qi, clearing heat and detoxification, acting as an expectorant and cough suppressant, reducing pain, and harmonizing various medicines [2,3]. Licorice has both direct and indirect effects on tumors, including disruption of the cell cycle [4], induction of apoptosis and autophagy [5,6], inhibition of cancer cell migration and spread [7], regulation of immunity [8], etc. It also benefits from a long-lasting action time, a wide range of targets, multiple pathways, and minimal toxic side effects. But, many licorice monomeric compounds still suffer from poor solubility, significant toxic side effects, and weak antitumor effectiveness. However, plenty of licorice’s monomeric compounds still suffer from issues such poor solubility, significant toxic side effects, and weak antitumor effectiveness when used in clinical settings. In light of these shortcomings, numerous research teams, both domestically and internationally, use cutting-edge science and technology to chemically alter the antitumor components of licorice in order to produce derivatives with high biological activity and good solubility and create novel antitumor medications. To provide a theoretical foundation for the continued development and application of licorice, this paper primarily analyzes the scientific progress of structural alterations of helpful antitumor chemical components in licorice.

2. Ingredient Research

2.1. Flavonoids

The basic parent nucleus of licorice flavonoids is 2-phenylchromonone, which refers to a series of compounds formed by two benzene rings (A and B rings) connected to each other by three carbon atoms. Most have the basic skeleton of C6-C3-C6 (Figure 1).

2.1.1. Flavonoids

The following 15 different kinds of flavonoids have the most frequently found in licorice (Table 1), while apigenin (Figure 2) has received more research attention for its structural changes and antitumor abilities. Following a review of the pertinent literature, it emerged that apigenin’s structural change focused mainly on the following categories:
(1) Etherification: Xiang et al. [17] used apigenin as raw materials to obtain six apigenin derivatives by introducing methyl ether and difluoromethyl ether at the 7th position of the A ring, difluoromethyl ether at the 4′ position of the B ring, difluoromethyl ether in the 7′ position of the A ring and 4′ position of the B ring at the same time, and bromine atoms at the 6th and 8th positions of the A ring at the same time, and the anti-liver cancer activity of the derivatives was studied in vitro (Scheme 1). The results showed that compound 3 (6,8-dibromo-7,4-dimethoxy-5-hydroxyflavone) had the strongest anti-liver cancer activity, with a potency 12.09 times that of the lead apigenin and 11.05 times that of the chemotherapy drug 5-FU, and the structure–activity relationship analysis speculated that it may be related to its simultaneous methyl etherification and bromination, and Cardenas et al [18] also found that the introduction of Cl or Br atoms at the C6 position of the flavonoid A ring can enhance its antitumor activity.
(2) Alkylation: According to Nikaido, T. et al. [19], the presence of isoprene groups in flavonoids greatly increased their lipophilicity, which can enable compound molecules to exhibit strong affinity for biofilms, which in turn can cause a significant increase in biological activity. The structure of apigenin includes three hydroxyl groups, namely, 4′, 5, and 7, and the activities of the various locations vary. Daskiewicz, J.B. et al. [20] protected phenolic hydroxyl groups at position 7 and 4′ with chloromethyl methyl ether, phenolic hydroxyl etherification and the introduction of isoprene at position C-5, and then they rearranged σ migration, migrated the 5-position isoprene group to position 8 on the skeleton, and finally deprotected to obtain 8-isoprenylapigenin (Scheme 2). Activity tests showed that the introduction of isoprene at the 8th position of apigenin could significantly inhibit the proliferation of HT-29 in human colon cancer cells and promote their apoptosis.
(3) Esterification: Aminophosphate is a phosphorus-containing analogue of natural amino acids; the introduction of amino phosphate can often enhance the antitumor activity of the parent drug, and some phosphoramide nitrogen mustard derivatives, such as cyclophosphamide, have been applied because of their good anticancer activity [21]. In order not to affect the amide bonds and ester bonds in the amino phosphate structure introduced by apigenin, Han, T [22] chose acetylation under the action of pyridine and acetic anhydride to protect the 4′, 5, and 7 hydroxyl groups, because the hydroxyl group on the 7th position is in the 4-position carbonyl group, the electron-absorbing effect of the carbonyl group enhanced the 7-hydroxyl acidity, so compared with other hydroxyl groups, it was easier to remove the 7-position hydroxyl group, obtain 4′, obtain 5-diacetylapigenin at its 7th position deprotector, and remove 4′. The results show that the five compounds could inhibit tumor cell proliferation to varying degrees, showing good tumor proliferation inhibition activity, especially B (substituent is leucine), D (substituent is alanine), and E (substituent is valine), with better activity, and the IC50 values were 25, 26.2, and 21 μmol/L, respectively, which has certain theoretical and practical significance for the development of drugs for the treatment of cervical cancer (Scheme 3).
(4) Formation of complexes: Modern research has demonstrated that rare earth metals have unique electronic structures, bonding properties, and high coordination numbers. By forming complexes with naturally occurring substances that have pharmacological activity, these metals can enhance or expand the pharmacological effects of the original ligand, and their toxicity is significantly decreased. Lanthanum nitrate and apigenin were used to create the lanthanum apigenin complex for the first time. The complex’s antitumor activity was tested on the cervical cancer cell line Hela, and the results revealed that it significantly inhibited cell proliferation when the concentration was higher than 30 ug/mL. The inhibitory impact grows over the same period of time as the compound concentration increases; at the same concentration point, the inhibitory effect rose as the complex’s action duration grew longer. It has greater biological activity than the ligand apigenin [23] (Scheme 4).

2.1.2. Flavonols

Currently, licorice contains mostly the following eight flavonols (Table 2), and in the study of structural modification of its antitumor components, galangin (Figure 3) and quercetin (Figure 4) have been reported more.
Fields of exploration into galangin’s structural change are outlined in the following order:
(1) At position 8, nitrogenous basic groups are inserted: With galangin as the starting material, Luo, Y et al. [29] introduced several nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds at the 8th position of its structure through the Mannich reaction (Scheme 5). The product’s antitumor activity was then evaluated using the MTT method, and the results shown that compound 2c and 2d had substantially higher proliferative inhibitory activity than galangin (IC50: 11.37 and 13.57 μmol/L) on human prostate cancer PC-3M. It was concluded that the addition of galangin 8-position nitrogenous heterocycles may be responsible for the augmentation of derivative activity after compound 2d’s proliferation inhibitory activity on human colon cancer LOVO cell lines had been raised 5.22-fold.
(2) Introduction of substituents at positions 3, 5, 7: Zhao, L et al. [30] conducted research on the effect of hindering the proliferation of human myeloid leukemia K562 cells through the inclusion of benzyl, acetyl, isopropyl, and trifluoromethyl substituents at positions 3, 5, and 7 of galangin to synthesize 12 derivatives (Figure 5). It turned out that when the 3-position hydroxyl group of galangal was benzylated, the activity also fell significantly when the 3rd and 7th hydroxyl groups of the parent nucleus underwent benzyl substitution, showing that the retention of the 7-position hydroxyl group was crucial for activity. However, more research on the structure–activity correlations is required because there are not many structural modifiers.
Additionally, studies have shown that quercetin in licorice has chemopreventive and antitumor effects, and it has inhibitory effects on human prostate cancer [31], breast cancer [32], lung cancer [33], lymphoma [34], ovarian cancer [35], and other malignant tumor cells; however, because quercetin is a planar molecule, its spatial structure is relatively tightly stacked, and it is not easily dispersed by solvents or solutes, making its water solubility poor (<7 μg/mL); this affects its pharmacokinetic properties, and the bioavailability after entering the human body is low (the peak plasma concentration is only 0.13~7.60 μmol/L) [36], thereby restricting the clinical use of quercetin as an anticancer medication, making its structural modification of particular importance. To summarize the study development of structural modification of quercetin in antitumor in recent years, the following three aspects are mainly considered:
(1) Hydroxyl esterification: Because quercetin has a total of five hydroxyl groups, its hydroxyl groups are typically selectively esterified. Mulholland, P. J et al. [37] and Golding, B. T et al. [38] used quercetin as a launching material, using it in different positions of hydroxyl groups to react differently, selectively maintaining hydroxyl groups to obtain compound 4, and then adjusting it with ethyl isocyanatoacetate to obtain compound 5. The synthesis of QC12 is shown in Scheme 6. After compound 5, dehydroxyprotector undergoes ester hydrolysis under acidic conditions to produce 3′-(N-carboxymethyl) carbamoyl-3, 4′, 5, 7-tetrahydroxyflavone (QC12), the derivative introduces glycine groups to increase its water solubility. Informal phase I clinical trials demonstrate that QC12 can inhibit the growth of human ovarian cancer A2780 cells and block cell proliferation in the late S stage and early G2, making it a new water-soluble anti-cancer lead compound (Scheme 6).
(2) Hydroxy ether formation: Liu, Q. et al. [39] used rutin as the starting material, followed by the Williamson ether reaction, amidation reaction, and Pd/C catalytic hydrodebenzyl to produce 13 quercetinamide derivatives (Scheme 7). When this series of derivatives was tested for antitumor activity, the results revealed that the antitumor activity had increased, with compound 713 having the greatest inhibitory effect on human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells EC109 (IC50 = 10.25 μmol L−1) was significantly superior to the parent drug quercetin (IC50 = 31.884 μmol·L−1) and 5-FU (IC50 = 41. 738 μmol·L−1).
(3) Formation of metal complexes: Quercetin is a particularly powerful metal chelating agent that can coordinate with a variety of metal ions to form complexes owing to its distinctive planar chemical structure, the presence of hydroxyl groups, and the presence of carbonyl groups. In relation to research by Ksenija et al. [40], quercetin lanthanum complexes have a potent cytotoxic effect on human cervical cancer cell lines (Hela) at concentrations between 100 and 1000 mmol mL−1 when exposed for a duration of three hours. Low-dose complexes will have the same biological effect on tumor cells without the negative side effects associated with high drug concentrations, making them potential antitumor medications.

2.1.3. Isoflavones

Isoflavones are important components in licorice, with phytoestrogen activity, which can inhibit the proliferation of a variety of cancer cells. Now, more licorice isoflavones have been discovered, primarily the following 37 compounds (Table 3), and the structural alteration of their antitumor components, formononetin (Figure 6) and genistein (Figure 7), is being researched more.
As an important class of antitumor drugs, nitrogen mustard derivatives are the general term of β-chloroethylamine compounds, including mono β-chloroethanamine and bis β chloroethanamine [61]. At present, the synthesis is relatively simple, the cost is low, and there are many nitrogen mustard drugs that have been used in clinical practice, but there are still shortcomings such as large adverse reactions, low treatment efficiency, poor selectivity, etc. Hu, K et al. [62] produced 15 nitrogen mustard derivatives of frmononetin with frmononetin as the mother in a straightforward five-step reaction involving nitrification, phenolic hydroxyetherification, reduction, amino substitution, and chlorine substitution. He then tested the target compounds’ effects on the human cancer cell lines HCT-116, DU-145, Hela, and SGC-7901 for their ability to inhibit tumor growth, and in vitro antitumor activity experiments showed that compound 6d had a significant effect on HCT-116 cells, and its IC50 was 3.80 μmol/L, which was stronger than that of the parent drug manganthocyanin (IC50 = 60.97 μmol/L) and the positive control mephalan (IC50 = 20.90 μmol/L), respectively. And, the results can be inferred that the introduction of formononetin in the 7-position hydroxyl group and nitrogen mustard in the 3′ position can enhance the inhibitory effect on tumor cells (Scheme 8). In order to create two novel NO donor-type anthocyanin derivatives, Xin, F et al. [63] connected NO donor fragments on 7-position phenolic hydroxyl groups using the design principle of synergistic prodrugs (Scheme 9).
Likewise, genistein has been highly regarded by the medical community in many different nations as a preventive agent for tumor cells because it has the advantage of not destroying normal cells. Although genistein has a significant first-pass effect and weak lipophilicity and hydrophilicity, this makes it difficult to reach the goal of therapeutic therapy of disorders due to limited bioavailability. As a result, its structure has undergone various changes to increase bioavailability. The following three aspects are where the structural change is currently concentrated.
(1) Modification of 7-position hydroxyl groups: Based on the lipophilicity and biodegradability of the derivatives, Polkowski, K et al. [64] synthesized an assortment of genistein glycoside derivatives (Figure 8). Studies on the survival of cells in cultivation and cytotoxicity have revealed that hydrophilic glycosides have substantially lower anticancer activity than free glycoside ligands. However, compared to genistein, lipophilic glycosides exhibit a markedly stronger anticancer activity. On the tumor cells Balb/c3T3, Popiołkiewicz’s [65] lipophilic genistein derivatives had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 5 mol/mL, which was a factor of ten lower than genistein’s.
(2) Structural modification of 4′-position hydroxyl group: By adding nitro to the 4′-position of the genistein backbone, Jin, Y et al. [66] constructed genistein nitro derivatives (Figure 9). Results highlighted that, with the exception of the parent compound nitrogenitrin, which exhibited strong antitumor activity, the antitumor effects of the other compounds were less potent than those of the mother compound. It was also evident that the isoflavones’ 7-position hydroxyl group may be the active essential component.
(3) Structural modification of 2 or 3 hydroxyl groups: Zhang, L et al. [67,68] synthesized more than 50 derivatives of genistein, and they tested the antitumor activity in vitro, in which the 7- and 4′ hydroxyl groups were replaced with ethoxycarbonylformyl groups in all derivatives; the results showed that the antitumor activity had the lowest IC50 (8.5 μmol/L), which was higher than that of the positive control 5-fluorouracil (IC50 = 13.4 μmol/L), which indicated that the replacement hydroxyl group introduced a lipophilic group. It can significantly improve the antitumor activity and lipophilicity of genistein derivatives.

2.1.4. Chalcones

At the moment, there are 24 different types of chalcones (Table 4) found in licorice. While researching the structural modifications of these compounds that make them antitumor active, many researchers discovered that isoliquiritigenin (Figure 10) is connected by two benzene rings, A and B, through the cross-conjugation of propenone. The connected bridge has three atoms, thus facilitating a large degree of selection freedom and a large spatial range of induction fit with the receptor.
Methoxy, -methyl, aryl, and 2′-oxygen-containing groups can be appended to its A ring for boosting its anti-mitotic activity [73,74]. Also, Ma, Y [75] added 10 Mannich groups (Scheme 10) to the A ring 3′-methyl position of 3′-methy lisoliquiritigenin, including dimethylamine, morpholine, cyclohexane, and diisopropylamine. Experiments in mice confirmed that the inhibition rate exceeded than that of isoglycyrrhizin, with diisopropylamine derivatives having the highest inhibition rate. The inhibition rate of isoliquiritigenin S180 tumor cells at 180mg·kg−1 was 71.68%. Yang, X et al. [76] and Xu, F et al. [77] discovered that isoliquiritigenin analogues prevented the spread of human cervical cancer cells and that they all had a clear pro-apoptosis effect on SiHa and HeLa cells at a dosage of 100 μg/mL. Activity was increased by adding a single methoxy or hydroxyl group to the isoliquiritigenin B ring’s third position. Although still powerful, the activity of the reduction of one hydroxyl group in the second position of the A ring is less than that of isoliquiritigenin. One hydroxyl group’s activity was decreased at the second position of the A ring, one hydroxyl group was added to the third position of the B ring, and one methoxy group’s activity was added to the fourth position, showing that the hydroxyl groups had been added. It was demonstrated that 3-methoxy isoliquiritigenin had a better apoptotic impact than isoliquiritigenin in the experiments on averting the proliferation of human liver cancer Bel-7402, and the highest possible apoptosis rate could reach 93.5% and 85%, respectively (Scheme 11).

2.1.5. Dihydroflavonoids

There has been little research conducted on the structural modification of antitumor activities for the following 22 dihydroflavonoids (Table 5) that typically occur in licorice.
Liquiritigenin is a flavonoid found in licorice roots. Ren, J et al. [83] discovered that glycyrrhizin along with methyl hydrazinodithioformate were refluxed in ethanol under acidic conditions to form hydrazone, and the methyl dithioformate group was hydrolyzed to thioformate, which was subsequently combined with the corresponding amines under the catalysis of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) to obtain a series of glycyrrhizin thiourea derivatives (Scheme 12); the authors also evaluated its effect on human leukemia cells (K562), cytotoxic activity of seven tumor cell lines of human prostate cancer cells (DU-145), human gastric cancer cells (SGC-7901), human colon cancer cells (HCT-116), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), human liver cancer cells (HepG2), human cervical cancer cells (Hela), and a normal cell line of human renal epithelial cells (293); and, in vitro anticancer activity indicates that most derivatives have certain activity against K562 and DU-145, and from the structure–activity relationship, the authors theorize that the introduction of an amithiourea group at the 4-C position of glycyrrhizin can improve anticancer activity.

2.2. Triterpenoids

Nowadays, licorice mostly contains the following 29 triterpenoid components (Table 6), and glycyrrhetinic acid (Figure 11) is being explored more in relation to the structural modifications of the following chemicals that have antitumor activity.
Glycyrrhetinic acid is usually structurally modified to change the activity due to the weak antitumor activity of the parent nuclear structure. According to a survey of the pertinent scientific literature, the structural change in glycyrrhetinic acid that gave it its antitumor effect focuses mostly on four different regions: the A ring modification, the C ring modification, the E ring modification, and the multi-ring modification. The hydroxyl group at position C-3 on the A ring, the unsaturated carbonyl group at position C-11 on the C ring, and the carboxyl group at position C-30 on the E ring all contain functional groups that are most appropriate for modification.
(1) A ring structure modification: In accordance with the drug stitching principle, the hydroxyacetylation at glycyrrhetinic acid C-3 was linked to matrine and melphalan under the action of (COCl)2, respectively, and two new glycyrrhetinic acid acetylated derivatives, a and b, were synthesized (Scheme 13); and, the antitumor activity in vivo showed that compounds a and b had a significant inhibitory effect on hepatoma cell SMMC-7721, with IC50 values of 85.7 and 178.2 μmol/L, respectively, and animal experiments showed that they were almost non-toxic to normal liver cells. It is expected to be a candidate for liver-targeted therapy [88]. In addition, in order to improve the polarity of glycyrrhetinic acid, Csuk, R et al. [89] prepared different glycyrrhetinic acid C-3 aminoalkyl derivatives (Scheme 14), and these derivatives were tested for antitumor activity; the results showed that compared with glycyrrhetinic acid, all amino compounds showed significant activity, and the activity changed with the change in carbon number, and when the number of carbon atoms was 6, the activity was the highest, and the IC50 was 0.6–3.0 uM.
(2) C ring modification: The structural modification research of the C ring mainly focuses on the carbonyl group at the C-11 position; Fiore, C et al. [90] and Mauro, S et al. [91] believe that the carbonyl group at the C-11 position is the main cause of the apoptotic activity of GA derivatives, but the study of Csuk, R et al. [89] shows that the existence of C-11 carbonyl group is not directly related to the apoptotic activity of the compound; therefore, the relationship between the existence of C-11 carbonyl group and apoptotic activity needs to be further studied.
(3) E ring modification: Liu, Y et al. [92] synthesized a series of glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives by introducing nitro radicals and amino acid fragments into glycyrrhetinic acid, and compound 6j (Figure 12) with tryptophan amino group and piperidine nitro group in these derivatives has the strongest cytotoxicity (GI50 is 13.7~15.0 μM), five times stronger than glycyrrhetinic acid, and it is speculated that adding nitro and amino acid fragments to the C-30 carboxyl group of glycyrrhetinic acid may help improve its cytotoxicity.
(4) Polycyclic modification: The polycyclic modification of glycyrrhetinic acid is mainly concentrated on the A, C and E rings, among which the structural modification of A ring and E ring is the most prominent. Shen, L.H et al. [93] found that modifying both the C-3 hydroxyl group and C-30 carboxyl group had antitumor activity, and they found that when the carbon chain length of the linker group was 2~4, the activity increased with the extension of the carbon chain length, and when the carbon chain length of the linker group was 5, the activity decreased. Additionally, they discovered that the compound’s anticancer effect was increased when C-3 and C-30 were present with nitrate moieties simultaneously.

3. Conclusions and Outlook

In recent times, some advancements have been made in the study and development of licorice-based antitumor pharmaceuticals, but there are still several issues that limit the creation and application of the therapeutic substance. The three main challenges are the ones that follow: (1) Liquiritin and glycyrrhizic acid ammonium salt have been designated as standard compounds to determine the quality of licorice in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2020 edition, but given that many other compounds have been found to have good pharmacological activity, it is advised to update the quality evaluation method to create more thorough, systematic, and standardized quality evaluation standards for licorice herbs, with the objective being to increase the efficiency of their utilization. (2) The research on the antitumor mechanisms is discussed from multiple viewpoints, the research is fragmented, and there is a lack of systematic and comprehensive analysis. The chemical structure modification of licorice antitumor drugs focuses mainly on flavonoids and triterpenoids, while carbohydrates and coumarins are less studied. (3) Licorice can detoxify hundreds of poisons and has the ability to harmoniously combine and detoxify different medications. Licorice is advantageous to the drug resistance brought on by anticancer medications and the sensitivity of tumor cells, according to fundamental research findings, although there are few clinical studies and insufficient links to basic research. As a result, future research on and the use of licorice will make use of pertinent network pharmacology, bioinformatics, and other converged technologies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.M., G.G., F.S. and C.L.; methodology, Q.M. and G.G.; formal analysis, Q.M. and C.L.; software and drawing, C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.M., F.S. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Jilin Province Science & Technology Development Plan (No. 20200404030YY).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Committee, N.P. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China: Part I; China Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2020; pp. 88–89. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shi, L.; Guo, Y.; Cao, S.; Pei, L.; Li, Y. Tracing to the Origin of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisc. Res. Pract. Chin. Med. 2020, 34, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Wong, Q.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Peng, H.; Cai, Q.; Li, B.; Yang, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. Herbal Textual Research on Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma in Chinese Classical Prescriptions. Mod. Chin. Med. 2020, 22, 1162–1174. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, S.; Li, C.; Huang, J.; Mo, D.; Luo, P.; Wang, H. Effects of glabridin on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of Hela cells from cervical cancer and its mechanisms. J. Mod. Oncol. 2020, 28, 3289–3293. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, W.; Zeng, H.; Le, J. Effect of Licochalcone A on Apoptosis in Human Breast Cancer MDA-MB-231 Cells. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2021, 27, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xin, H.; Xu, W. Effect of licochalcone A on autophagy in renal cell carcinoma via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. China J. Chin. Mater. Medica 2018, 43, 3545–3552. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, J.; Luo, P.; Fei, Z. Anti–tumor effects and cellular mechanisms of Licochalcone A. J. Mod. Oncol. 2016, 24, 3870–3874. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, N.; Zhang, X. Effect of Glycyrrhizin on Immune Function and Apoptosis of U14 Cervical Cancer Mice. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2021, 42, 370–376. [Google Scholar]
  9. Luo, Z.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, M. Advances in studies on Glycyrrhiza glabra. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2011, 42, 2154–2158. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, N.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, G.; Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; Li, M.; Liao, W.; Ren, Y. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of different varieties of Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma and predictive analysis of quality markers. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2021, 52, 7680–7692. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yahara, S.; Nishioka, I. Flavonoid glucosides from licorice. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2108–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montoro, P.; Maldini, M.; Russo, M.; Postorino, S.; Piacente, S.; Pizza, C. Metabolic profiling of roots of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) from different geographical areas by ESI/MS/MS and determination of major metabolites by LC-ESI/MS and LC-ESI/MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 54, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jing, J.; Mei, L.; Zhi, Y.H.; Zhi, Y.H. In Vitro Evaluation of The Inhibitory Effect of Commonly Used Pharmaceutical Excipients on the Six CYP Isoforms. In Proceedings of the 4th Asian Pacific Regional International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics Meeting, Taiwan, China, 22–25 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leng, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, S. Two new triterpenoid saponins from roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2015, 46, 1576–1582. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, Q.; Miao, W.; Xiang, C.; Guo, D.; Ye, M. Chemical constituents from Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2012, 43, 1886–1890. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jia, W.; Liu, D.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Two new isoprenyl flavonoids from the leaves of glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch. Acta Pharm. Sin. 1993, 1993, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xiang, H.; Geng, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Jian, J. Synthesis and Anti-hepatoma Activities of Apigenin etherified and brominated derivatives. J. Hunan Norm. Univ. 2009, 6, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cárdenas, M.; Marder, M.; Blank, V.C.; Roguin, L.P. Antitumor activity of some natural flavonoids and synthetic derivatives on various human and murine cancer cell lines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 2966–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nikaido, T.; Ohmoto, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Sankawa, U.; Monache, F.D.; Botta, B.; Tomimori, T.; Miyaichi, Y.; Shirataki, Y.; Yokoe, I.; et al. Inhibition of adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate phosphodiesterase by flavonoids III. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 1392–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Daskiewicz, J.B.; Depeint, F.; Viornery, L.; Bayet, C.; Comte-Sarrazin, G.; Comte, G.; Gee, J.M.; Johnson, I.T.; Ndjoko, K.; Hostettmann, K. Effects of flavonoids on cell proliferation and caspase activation in a human colonic cell line HT29: An SAR study. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2790–2804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Colvin, O.M. An overview of cyclophosphamide development and clinical applications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 1999, 5, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, T. Design and Synthesis of Six Kinds of Flavone-7-Phosphoramidate Derivatives. Master’s Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, Y.; Tao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, S.; Guo, H. Structure and Biological Activity of the La(III) Complex with Apigenin. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2014, 26, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar]
  24. Patil, S.M.; Patil, M.B.; Sapkale, G.N. antimicrobial activity of glycyrrhiza glabra linn. Roots. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2009, 7, 585–591. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, B.; Wan, C. Chemical constituents from aerial parts of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2016, 47, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, W.; Song, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, H.; An, J. Advances in Research on Chemical Constituents of Radix Glycyrrhiza. J. Liaoning Univ. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2012, 14, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fan, Y. Isolation, Identification, Quantification and Bioactivity Assessment of the Chemical Constituents in Glycyrrhiza Uralensis Leaves. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xiao, Y.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X.; Jin, J.; Li, Y.; Ge, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhang, C. Research progress on chemical constituents, pharmacological effects and clinical applications of Shaoyao Gancao Decoction and predictive analysis of its Q-Marker. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2022, 53, 7960–7969. [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo, Y.; You, P.; Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D. Synthesis and Antitumor Activities of Nitrogen-Containing Galangin Derivatives. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2017, 29, 575–578. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao, L.; Wu, F. Structural modification of galangin and the study of inhibition activity on K562 cells. J. Wuhan Polytech. Univ. 2016, 35, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gf, A.; Fas, B.; Sv, C.; Aa, D.; Hs, E.; Ak, F.; Mt, G.; Ab, G. Emerging impact of quercetin in the treatment of prostate cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 138, 111548. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ezzati, M.; Yousefi, B.; Velaei, K.; Safa, A. A review on anti-cancer properties of Quercetin in breast cancer. Life Sci. 2020, 248, 117463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, P.; Li, X.; Wen, Q.; Zhao, X. Quercetin attenuates the proliferation of arsenic-related lung cancer cells via a caspase-dependent DNA damage signaling. Mol. Carcinog. 2022, 61, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soofiyani, S.R.; Hosseini, K.; Forouhandeh, H.; Ghasemnejad, T.; Tarhriz, V.; Asgharian, P.; Reiner, Ž.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Cho, W.C. Quercetin as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Lymphoma. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 3157867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parvaresh, A.; Razavi, R.; Rafie, N.; Ghiasvand, R.; Miraghajani, M. Quercetin and ovarian cancer: An evaluation based on a systematic review. J. Res. Med. Sci. Off. J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci. 2016, 21, 34. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sun, T.; Sun, C.; Dai, G.; Zhang, H. Syntheses of derivatives of 4′-alkylaminoalkylquercetin. Chin. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 13, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mulholland, P.J.; Ferry, D.R.; Anderson, D.; Hussain, S.A.; Young, A.M.; Cook, J.E.; Hodgkin, E.; Seymour, L.W.; Kerr, D.J. Pre-clinical and clinical study of QC12, a water-soluble, pro-drug of quercetin. Ann. Oncol. 2001, 12, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Golding, B.T.; Griffin, R.J.; Quarterman, C.P.; Slack, J.A.; Williams, J.G. Analogues or Derivatives of Quercetin (Prodrugs). U.S. Patent 6,258,840, 31 December 1997. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Q.; Feng, Y.; Qu, W.; Zhai, G. Synthesis and Biological Activities of Quercetin Amide Derivatives. Chin. Pharm. J. 2019, 54, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar]
  40. Durgo, K.; Halec, I.; Šola, I.; Franekić, J. Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of the Quercetin/Lanthanum Complex on Human Cervical Carcinoma Cells In Vitro. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2011, 62, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  41. Du, L.; Chang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, F.; Du, W. Chemical constituents of flavonoids from roots of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2018, 49, 4780–4784. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Hu, B.; Liu, Q.; Hou, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J. Isoflavones from glycyrrhiza eurycarpa. Acta Pharm. Sin. 1997, 32, 62–65. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Z.; Han, L.; Liu, X.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, K. Preparation and separation of onon in from glycyrrhiza uralensisi fish with high-speed counter current chromtography. Shandong Sci. 2010, 23, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, Y. Study of licorice composition: Structure of glycyrrhizone. J. Int. Pharm. Res. 1975, 01, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, Q.; Liu, Y. An overview of research on flavonoids in licorice. Chin. Pharm. J. 1989, 12, 705–709. [Google Scholar]
  46. Asada, Y.; Li, W.; Yoshikawa, T. The first prenylated biaurone, licoagrone from hairy root cultures of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 1015–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Patel, K.; Patel, D.K. The Potential Therapeutic Properties of Prunetin against Human Health Complications: A Review of Medicinal Importance and Pharmacological Activities. Drug Metab. Bioanal. Lett. 2022, 15, 166–177. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hayashi, H.; Yasuma, M.; Hiraoka, N.; Ikeshiro, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Ye?Ilada, E.; Sezik, E.; Honda, G.; Tabata, M. Flavonoid variation in the leaves of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 701–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, W.; Asada, Y.; Yoshikawa, T. Flavonoid constituents from Glycyrrhiza glabra hairy root cultures. Phytochemistry 2000, 55, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, D. Talking about the ingredients of licorice and their effects. Chin. Med. Mod. Distance Educ. China 2012, 10, 128–129. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kai, L.; Ji, S.; Wei, S.; Kuang, Y.; Ye, M. Glycybridins A-K, Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 334–346. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, D.; Gao, X.; Guo, H.; Fu, X.; Wang, W. Studies on chemical constituents on roots of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Chin. J. Pharm. Anal. 2011, 31, 1251–1255. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rui, C. Domestic research progress on the chemical composition of licorice. Chin. J. Sch. Dr. 2006, 1, 105–106. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu, J.; Yang, S.; Fu, Y.; Xu, D.; Jiang, C.; Hou, F. Study on the flavonoids of licorice. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 1992, 23, 349–350. [Google Scholar]
  55. Xing, G.; Li, N.; Wang, T.; Yao, M. Advances in studies on flavonoids of licorice. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2003, 28, 593–597. [Google Scholar]
  56. Huang, Y.; Chi, Z.; Wang, S.; Wu, H.; Qin, K.; Li, W. Research progress on Licorice flavonoids and their antitumor activities. Chin. J. New Drugs 2017, 26, 1532–1537. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yuldashev, M.P.; Batirov, E.K.; Vdovin, A.D.; Abdullaev, N.D. Structural study of glabrisoflavone, a novel isoflavone fromGlycyrrhiza glabraL. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2000, 26, 784–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fukai, T.; Tantai, L.; Nomura, T. Isoprenoid-substituted flavonoids from Glycyrrhiza glabra. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 531–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhardwaj, D.K.; Seshadri, T.R.; Singh, R. Glyzarin, a new isoflavone from Glycyrrhiza glabra. Phytochemistry 1977, 16, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hong, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, X.; Dou, D.; Pei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Koike, K.; Nikaido, T. Study on the chemical constituents of aerial parts of cultivated licorice. Northwest Pharm. J. 2005, 2, 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhuang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, D. Research progress of nitrogen mustard antitumor drugs. Chin. Pharm. J. 2008, 17, 1281–1287. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hu, K.; Xu, H.; Xin, W.; Chen, X.; Ren, J. Synthesis and antitumor activity of nitrogen mustard derivatives of formononetin. J. China Pharm. Univ. 2012, 43, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  63. Xin, F.; Yang, X.; Huang, L.; Lin, J.; Wei, J. Synthesis and characterization of anthocyanin derivatives with NO release. Chem. Reag. 2011, 33, 958–960. [Google Scholar]
  64. Polkowski, K.; Popiołkiewicz, J.; Krzeczyński, P.; Ramza, J.; Pucko, W.; Zegrocka-Stendel, O.; Boryski, J.; Skierski, J.S.; Mazurek, A.P.; Grynkiewicz, G. Cytostatic and cytotoxic activity of synthetic genistein glycosides against human cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2004, 203, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Popio?Kiewicz, J.; Polkowski, K.; Skierski, J.S.; Mazurek, A.P. In vitro toxicity evaluation in the development of new anticancer drugs-genistein glycosides. Cancer Lett. 2005, 229, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jin, Y.; Liu, C.; Wu, Q.; Yao, B.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, L.; Shen, X. Design and synthesis of genistein derivatives 5-hydroxy-4′-nitro-7-substituted-acyloxo-isoflavone and their antitumor effects. Acad. J. Nav. Med. Univ. 2005, 26, 182–185. [Google Scholar]
  67. Li, H.Q.; Ge, H.M.; Chen, Y.X.; Xu, C.; Shi, L.; Ding, H.; Zhu, H.L.; Tan, R.X. Synthesis and Cytotoxic Evaluation of a Series of Genistein Derivatives. Chem. Biodivers. 2006, 3, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, L.N.; Xiao, Z.P.; Ding, H.; Ge, H.M.; Tan, R.X. Synthesis and Cytotoxic Evaluation of Novel 7-O-Modified Genistein Derivatives. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 4, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kuroda, M.; Mimaki, Y.; Honda, S.; Tanaka, H.; Yokota, S.; Mae, T. Phenolics from Glycyrrhiza glabra roots and their PPAR-γ ligand-binding activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, T.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Guo, D.A. An integrated exact mass spectrometric strategy for comprehensive and rapid characterization of phenolic compounds in licorice. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2013, 27, 2297–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kinoshita, T.; Kajiyama, K.; Hiraga, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Tamura, Y.; Mizutani, K. The Isolation of New Pyrano-2-arylbenzofuran Derivatives from the Root of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996, 44, 1218–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Asada, Y.; Wei, L.; Yoshikawa, T. Isoprenylated flavonoids from hairy root cultures of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, T.; Hu, Y. Mannich Reaction of 2′-Hydroxychalcone and Biological Activity of Its Mannich Base. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 26, 983–987. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kong, Y.; Wang, K.; Edler, M.C.; Hamel, E.; Mooberry, S.L.; Paige, M.A.; Brown, M.L. A boronic acid chalcone analog of combretastatin A-4 as a potent anti-proliferation agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ma, Y. Synthesis and Antitumor Activity of Isoglycyrrhizin and Its Derivatives. Master’s thesis, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Muhebuli, A.; Xilizhati, A.; Ren, B. Synthesis of Chalcone Isoliquiritigenin Compounds and Its Anti-cervical Cancer Activity. Chin. J. Mod. Appl. Pharm. 2016, 33, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  77. Xu, F.; Mourboul, A.; Gao, M.; Sheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Abulizi, A. Anticaner activity of licorice chalcone derivatives in human Bel-7402 hepatocarinoman cell lines. J. Xinjiang Med. Univ. 2013, 36, 143–149. [Google Scholar]
  78. Somjen, D.; Katzburg, S.; Vaya, J.; Kaye, A.M.; Hendel, D.; Posner, G.H.; Tamir, S. Estrogenic activity of glabridin and glabrene from licorice roots on human osteoblasts and prepubertal rat skeletal tissues. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 91, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gupta, V.K.; Fatima, A.; Faridi, U.; Negi, A.S.; Shanker, K.; Kumar, J.K.; Rahuja, N.; Luqman, S.; Sisodia, B.S.; Saikia, D. Antimicrobial potential of Glycyrrhiza glabra roots. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Han, J.B.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Yi, L.; Hu, Y.L. Chemical constituents and chemotaxonomic study of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2020, 92, 104130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Litvinenko, V.I.; Obolentseva, G.V. Chemical and pharmaceutical research on flavanoids of glycyrrhiza glabra l. and glycyrrhiza uralensis fisch. Med. Prom. Sssr 1964, 19, 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  82. Fukui, H.; Goto, K.; Tabata, M. Two antimicrobial flavanones from the leaves of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 4174–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ren, J.; Pan, S.; Hu, K. Synthesis and anticancer activity of liquiritigenin thiosemicarbazone derivatives. J. Shenyang Pharm. Univ. 2011, 28, 192–197. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Yao, J.; Zheng, S. GC-MS analysis of volatile constituents from the leaves of Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn. Northwest Pharm. J. 2006, 4, 153–155. [Google Scholar]
  85. Wei, J. Study on the Chemical Composition and Activity of Triterpene Saponins of Licorice; Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine: Nanjing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zheng, Y.; Sun, J.; Duan, W.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Lu, T.; Li, C.; Peng, G. Chemical constituents of triterpenoid saponins from Glycyrrhiza glabra. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2021, 56, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  87. Shi, R.; Kan, Y.; Li, X. Study on chemical composition of dichloromethane extraction site of prickly fruit licorice. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2001, 1, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang, N.; Cui, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, D.; Dai, L.; Tao, Z. Synthesis and Antitumor Activities of 18α-Glycyrrhetinic Acid Derivatives. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Formulae 2015, 21, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  89. Csuk, R.; Schwarz, S.; Kluge, R.; Ströhl, D. Synthesis and biological activity of some antitumor active derivatives from glycyrrhetinic acid. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5718–5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fiore, C.; Salvi, M.; Palermo, M.; Sinigaglia, G.; Armanini, D.; Toninello, A. On the mechanism of mitochondrial permeability transition induction by glycyrrhetinic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1658, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mauro, S.; Cristina, F.; Valentina, B.; Mario, P.; Decio, A.; Antonio, T. Carbenoxolone induces oxidative stress in liver mitochondria, which is responsible for transition pore opening. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 2306–2312. [Google Scholar]
  92. Liu, Y.; Qian, K.; Wang, C.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Yang, X.; Lee, K.H. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel spin labeled 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 7530–7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shen, L.H.; Lai, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.H.; Luo, X.X.; Zhang, L.Y. Synthesis and anti-tumor activities of nitrate derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid. J. China Pharm. Univ. 2008, 39, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. 2-Phenylchromone structure and C6-C3-C6 basic skeleton.
Figure 1. 2-Phenylchromone structure and C6-C3-C6 basic skeleton.
Molecules 28 05855 g001
Figure 2. The structure of apigenin.
Figure 2. The structure of apigenin.
Molecules 28 05855 g002
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of apigenin etherified derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of apigenin etherified derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthetic route of 8-isoprenylapigenin.
Scheme 2. Synthetic route of 8-isoprenylapigenin.
Molecules 28 05855 sch002
Scheme 3. Route of synthesis of apigenin esterified derivatives.
Scheme 3. Route of synthesis of apigenin esterified derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch003
Scheme 4. Apigenin complex synthesis route.
Scheme 4. Apigenin complex synthesis route.
Molecules 28 05855 sch004
Figure 3. The structure of galangin.
Figure 3. The structure of galangin.
Molecules 28 05855 g003
Figure 4. The structure of quercetin.
Figure 4. The structure of quercetin.
Molecules 28 05855 g004
Scheme 5. Synthetic route of galangin nitrogenous derivatives.
Scheme 5. Synthetic route of galangin nitrogenous derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch005
Figure 5. Galangin 3, 5, and 7 substituent derivatives.
Figure 5. Galangin 3, 5, and 7 substituent derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 g005
Scheme 6. QC12 synthesis path.
Scheme 6. QC12 synthesis path.
Molecules 28 05855 sch006
Scheme 7. Route of synthesis of quercetinamide derivatives.
Scheme 7. Route of synthesis of quercetinamide derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch007
Figure 6. The structure of formononetin.
Figure 6. The structure of formononetin.
Molecules 28 05855 g006
Figure 7. The structure of genistein.
Figure 7. The structure of genistein.
Molecules 28 05855 g007
Scheme 8. Synthetic route of nitrogen mustard derivatives.
Scheme 8. Synthetic route of nitrogen mustard derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch008
Scheme 9. Synthetic route of NO donor derivatives of formononetin.
Scheme 9. Synthetic route of NO donor derivatives of formononetin.
Molecules 28 05855 sch009
Figure 8. Genistein glycoside derivative structure.
Figure 8. Genistein glycoside derivative structure.
Molecules 28 05855 g008
Figure 9. Structural formula of genistein nitro derivative.
Figure 9. Structural formula of genistein nitro derivative.
Molecules 28 05855 g009
Figure 10. The structure of isoliquiritigenin.
Figure 10. The structure of isoliquiritigenin.
Molecules 28 05855 g010
Scheme 10. Route of synthesis of isoliquiritigenin Mannich base derivative.
Scheme 10. Route of synthesis of isoliquiritigenin Mannich base derivative.
Molecules 28 05855 sch010
Scheme 11. Isoliquiritigenin analogue synthesis route.
Scheme 11. Isoliquiritigenin analogue synthesis route.
Molecules 28 05855 sch011
Scheme 12. Synthetic route of glycyrrhizin thiourea derivatives.
Scheme 12. Synthetic route of glycyrrhizin thiourea derivatives.
Molecules 28 05855 sch012
Figure 11. The structure of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Figure 11. The structure of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Molecules 28 05855 g011
Scheme 13. Synthetic route of acetylated derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Scheme 13. Synthetic route of acetylated derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Molecules 28 05855 sch013
Scheme 14. Route of synthesis of aminoalkyl derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Scheme 14. Route of synthesis of aminoalkyl derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid.
Molecules 28 05855 sch014
Figure 12. The structure of compound 6j.
Figure 12. The structure of compound 6j.
Molecules 28 05855 g012
Table 1. Licorice flavonoid compounds.
Table 1. Licorice flavonoid compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1schaftosideC26H28O14[9]
2vicenin-2C27H30O15[9]
3isoshaftosideC26H28O14[9]
4shaftosideC26H28O14[9]
5isoviolanthinC27H30O14[9]
6isoschaftosideC26H28O14[10]
7violanthinC27H30O14[10]
8apigeninC15H10O5[11]
9licoflavonC20H18O4[12]
10kumatakeninC17H14O6[13]
11naringinC27H32O14[14]
12isoangustone AC25H26O6[15]
13genkwaninC16H12O5[16]
14uralenolC21H18O7[15]
Table 2. Licorice flavonol compounds.
Table 2. Licorice flavonol compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1licoflavonolC20H18O6[24]
2galanginC15H10O5[25]
3kaempferolC15H10O6[16]
4isoquercetinC21H20O12[16]
5astragalinC21H20O11[16]
6narcissinC28H32O16[26]
7isoquercitrinC21H20O12[27]
8quercetinC15H10O7[28]
Table 3. Licorice isoflavone compounds.
Table 3. Licorice isoflavone compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1licoisoflavone AC20H18O6[41]
2eurycarpin AC20H18O5[42]
3formononetinC16H12O4[43]
4eurycarpin B C20H16O5[42]
5gancaonin GC21H20O5[36]
6licoriconeC22H22O6[44]
7afromosinC17H14O5[45]
8odoratinC17H14O6[46]
9prunetinC16H12O5[47]
10genisteinC15H10O5[48]
11ononinC22H22O9[42]
12licoagroside AC23H25O12[49]
13lupiwighteoneC20H18O5[50]
142,3-dehydrokievitoneC20H18O6[51]
15gancaonin HC25H24O6[52]
16glycyrosideC27H30O13[53]
17calycosinC16H12O5[54]
18glabreneC20H18O4[55]
192′-hydroxyisolupalbigeninC25H26O6[56]
20licoriconeC22H22O6[55]
21glicoriconeC21H20O6[55]
223′,6′-diethoxyfluoresceinC24H20O5[55]
233,7-dimethyl licoflavonolC22H24O6[15]
24glabrizoflavoneC20H18O6[57]
256,8-di-(dimethylallyl)-genisteinC25H26O5[58]
26glyzarinC18H14O4[59]
27isoglabroneC20H16O5[60]
28parvisoflavone BC20H16O6[56]
293′,4′-dihydroxy-7-methoxyisoflavoneC16H12O5[10]
30derroneC20H16O5[51]
31parvisoflavones AC20H16O6[51]
32isoglabroneC20H16O5[51]
33glycybridin DC25H26O4[55]
34glycybridin EC25H24O4[55]
35glycybridin JC21H22O6[55]
36semilicoisoflavone BC20H16O6[42]
Table 4. Licorice chalcone compounds.
Table 4. Licorice chalcone compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1isoliquiritigeninC15H12O4[55]
2isoliquiritinC21H22O9[12]
3licurasideC26H30O13[12]
4licochalcone AC21H22O4[12]
5licochalcone BC16H14O5[12]
6neoisoliquiritinC21H22O9[12]
7echinatinC16H14O4[69]
8glycybridin AC20H20O5[51]
9glycybridin BC20H22O5[51]
10glycybridin CC25H30O5[51]
11kanzonol YC25H30O5[51]
12kanzonol CC25H28O4[51]
13kanzonol BC20H18O4[51]
14licoagrochalcone AC20H20O4[51]
15paratocarpins BC25H26O4[51]
16isobavachalconeC20H20O4[51]
17chalconaringenin4-O-glucosideC21H22O10[70]
183-hydroxylicochalcone EC21H22O5[70]
19licoagrochalcone DC21H22O5[70]
20[6″,6″-dimethylpyran-(2″,3″4,5)]-3′-γ,γ-dimethylally-2′,3,4′-thrihydroxychalconeC25H26O5[71]
21licoagrochalcone CC21H22O5[60]
22kanzonol CC25H28O4[60]
234-hydroxylonchocarpinC20H18O4[72]
24licoagrochalcone BC21H20O4[49]
Table 5. Licorice dihydroflavonid compounds.
Table 5. Licorice dihydroflavonid compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1glabrolC25H28O4[78]
2glabraninC20H20O4[55]
3liquiritigeninC15H12O4[55]
4glabranin isomerC20H20O4[79]
5liquiritinC21H22O9[12]
6liquiritin apiosideC26H30O13[12]
7pinocembrinC15H12O4[80]
8licoflavanoneC20H18O5[80]
9xambioonaC25H24O4[51]
10shinflavanoneC25H26O4[51]
11(2S)-abyssinone IC20H18O4[51]
12euchrenone a5C25H26O4[51]
13naringeninC15H12O5[51]
14abyssinone IIC20H20O4[51]
15naringinC27H32O14[51]
16pinocembrosideC21H22O9[9]
17shinflavoneC25H26O4[55]
18licoagrodinC45H44O9[81]
19neoliquiritinC21H22O9[81]
203′-prenylnaringeninC21H22O9[82]
21cyclolicoflavanoneC20H20O5[82]
22glabranineC20H20O4[82]
Table 6. Licorice triterpene compounds.
Table 6. Licorice triterpene compounds.
Serial NumberName of the CompoundMolecular FormulaReference
1glycyrrhizic acidC42H62O16[84]
2glycyrrhetinic acidC30H46O4[84]
3glycyrrhizinC42H62O16[84]
4glycyrrhetolC30H48O3[12]
5glabric acidC30H46O5[12]
6liquoric acidC30H44O5[12]
7glabrolideC30H44O4[12]
8isoglabrolideC30H44O4[12]
9ursolic acidC30H48O3[80]
10betulinC30H50O2[80]
11lupeolC30H50O[80]
12licorice-saponin M3C48H74O19[85]
13licorice-saponin N4C54H84O23[85]
14licorice-saponin O4C54H84O24[85]
15licoricesaponin G2C42H62O17[85]
1618α-licorice-saponin G2C42H62O17[85]
17macedonoside AC42H62O17[85]
1829-hydroxy-glycyrrhizinC42H62O16[85]
19licorice-saponin A3C48H72O21[85]
2024-hydroxy-licorice-saponin A3C48H72O22[85]
2122β-acetoxyl-glycyrrhizinC44H64O18[85]
22licorice-saponin H2C42H62O16[12]
23licorice-saponin R3C48H74O20[86]
24licoricesaponin S3C48H75O20[86]
25uralsaponin CC42H64O16[86]
2618α-glycyrrhizic acidC42H62O16[10]
2718β-glycyrrhizic acidC42H62O16[10]
28licorice-saponin P2C42H62O17[10]
29betulic acidC30H48O3[87]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.; Ma, Q.; Gong, G.; Su, F. Research Progress on Structural Modification of Effective Antitumor Active Ingredients in Licorice. Molecules 2023, 28, 5855. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155855

AMA Style

Liu C, Ma Q, Gong G, Su F. Research Progress on Structural Modification of Effective Antitumor Active Ingredients in Licorice. Molecules. 2023; 28(15):5855. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155855

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Chi, Qing Ma, Guangfei Gong, and Fengyan Su. 2023. "Research Progress on Structural Modification of Effective Antitumor Active Ingredients in Licorice" Molecules 28, no. 15: 5855. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155855

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop