Next Article in Journal
Topological and Spectral Properties of Wavy Zigzag Nanoribbons
Next Article in Special Issue
Coumarin-Based Sulfonamide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors: Pre-ADME Analysis, Toxicity Profile, Computational Analysis, and In Vitro Enzyme Assay
Previous Article in Journal
Two Biosensors for the Determination of VEGF-R2 in Plasma by Array SPRi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules28010149
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Virtual Screening, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Some Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors

by
Prerana B. Jadhav
1,*,
Shailaja B. Jadhav
2,
Mehrukh Zehravi
3,
Mohammad S. Mubarak
4,
Fahadul Islam
5,
Philippe Jeandet
6,
Sharuk L. Khan
7,
Nazmul Hossain
5,
Salma Rashid
5,
Long Chiau Ming
8,
Md. Moklesur Rahman Sarker
9,10,* and
Mohd Fahami Nur Azlina
11,*
1
S.N.D. College of Pharmacy, Babhulgaon, Yeola 423401, India
2
PES’s Modern College of Pharmacy, Nigdi, Pune 411044, India
3
Department of Clinical Pharmacy Girls Section, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University Alkharj, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Chemistry, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
5
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
6
Research Unit-Induced Resistance and Plant Bioprotection, University of Reims, EA 4707—USC INRAe 1488, SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 51687 Reims, France
7
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, N.B.S. Institute of Pharmacy, Ausa 413520, India
8
School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway 47500, Malaysia
9
Department of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, 77 Satmasjid Road, Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh
10
Health Med Science Research Network, 3/1, Block F, Lalmatia, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
11
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yacob Latif, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(1), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010149
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 24 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence and Data Science in the Drug Discovery)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitors are known as safe and well-tolerated antidiabetic medicine. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to synthesize some carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d) as DPP-IV inhibitors. In addition, this work involves simulations using molecular docking, ADMET analysis, and Lipinski and Veber’s guidelines. Wet-lab synthesis was used to make derivatives that met all requirements, and then FTIR, NMR, and mass spectrometry were used to confirm the structures and perform biological assays. In this context, in vitro enzymatic and in vivo antidiabetic activity evaluations were carried out. None of the molecules had broken the majority of the drug-likeness rules. Furthermore, these molecules were put through additional screening using molecular docking. In molecular docking experiments (PDB ID: 2P8S), many molecules displayed more potent interactions than native ligands, exhibiting more hydrogen bonds, especially those with chloro- or fluoro substitutions. Our findings indicated that compounds 5b and 4c have IC50 values of 28.13 and 34.94 µM, respectively, under in vitro enzymatic assays. On the 21st day of administration to animals, compound 5b exhibited a significant reduction in serum blood glucose level (157.33 ± 5.75 mg/dL) compared with the diabetic control (Sitagliptin), which showed 280.00 ± 13.29 mg/dL. The antihyperglycemic activity showed that the synthesized compounds have good hypoglycemic potential in fasting blood glucose in the type 2 diabetes animal model (T2DM). Taken all together, our findings indicate that the synthesized compounds exhibit excellent hypoglycemic potential and could be used as leads in developing novel antidiabetic agents.

1. Introduction

Hyperglycemia and many other alterations of carbohydrate and protein metabolisms are symptoms of diabetes mellitus, often known as “DM”, a chronic metabolic disorder. The two main causes of diabetes are insulin resistance (in type 1 DM) and an inadequate amount of insulin being produced and used by the body (type 2 DM) [1]. The number of people diagnosed with diabetes every year is increasing across the world. According to estimates provided by the International Diabetes Federation, the number of people living with diabetes reached 30 million in 1985, and this number is expected to reach 380 million by 2025 [2].
When managing type 2 diabetes, the family of oral antidiabetic medicines known as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitors is well-established [3]. Since the publication of the first clinical research evaluating the effects of DPP-IV inhibitors in 2002, multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that DPP-IV inhibitors are effective, safe, and well-tolerated [4]. They achieve this without posing an inherent danger of hypoglycemia by raising endogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) concentrations, which cause stimulation of insulin release while inhibiting glucagon secretion. Their safety profile seems promising, and their potential effectiveness in bringing down HbA1c is 0.5 to 1.0 percentage points [5]. DPP-IV inhibitors do not affect body weight, and there is evidence that they are safe for the cardiovascular system. These drugs may still be utilized even in patients with compromised renal function [6,7]. In individuals who do not need diabetes treatment with proven cardiovascular benefits, guidelines recommend the extra use of DPP-IV inhibitors if metformin fails to control the patient’s blood sugar levels.
Recently, DPP-IV inhibitors are progressively replacing sulfonylureas as second-line therapy after metformin failure. Additionally, various metformin/DPP-IV inhibitor fixed dosage combinations are already available. In the latter stages of type 2 diabetes, DPP-IV inhibitors are also indicated in the recommendations as part of triple treatments with metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitors or with metformin and insulin [8,9]. These triple therapies are used to treat diabetes. When starting treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists, the use of DPP-IV inhibitors should be ceased. DPP-IV inhibitors have the potential to be employed as monotherapy in situations when metformin is not appropriate or intolerable. In this regard, a few trials have shown that early combined treatment with metformin and DPP-IV inhibitors benefits certain groups of patients [5,10].
Sitagliptin was the first agent to be launched (in 2006), and additional drugs came out shortly after that. The medications sitagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, and alogliptin are the most used. Countries in Asia make use of anagliptin, gemigliptin, and teneligliptin as diabetes medications. Moreover, DPP-IV inhibitors are included as part of the therapy algorithms in several national and global recommendations for treating type 2 diabetes [11]. In light of the findings described above, new DPP-IV inhibitors are now being developed. When looking at the structures of approved DPP-IV inhibitors, it was observed that ring systems containing nitrogen atoms along with an amide (–CONH) core were very common in most of them. In view of this, pyrimidine was selected as the basal nucleus to develop DPP-IV inhibitors. Figure 1 pictures the general method used to obtain some of these DPP-IV inhibitors along with their structures. Table 1 lists the different substitutions employed to build the derivatives. In the current study, our goal was to obtain potent DPP-IV inhibitors by synthesizing 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-N’-[(E)substituted-methylidene]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide derivatives. This includes simulations using molecular docking, ADMET analysis, and Lipinski and Veber’s guidelines for the hypothesized derivatives. The derivatives that effectively met all requirements were subjected to wet-lab synthesis and biological testing. Finally, in vitro enzymatic tests and in vivo antidiabetic activity evaluations were carried out.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Virtual Screening of the Designed Derivatives

2.1.1. In Silico ADMET Analysis

Pharmacokinetic characteristics are essential for drug development because they enable researchers to assess the biological components of effective medicines. Lipinski’s rule of five and Veber’s criterion was used to determine if the compounds were appropriate for oral bioavailability (Table 2). All proposed compounds were studied for their ADME features to get a deeper comprehension of their pharmacokinetic profiles and the drug-like qualities each of them (Table 3). Oral acute toxicity, LD50 (in mg/kg), toxicity class, and other toxicity parameters have all been anticipated (Table 4).
In developing new medications, the goal is to convert a therapeutic chemical into a dosage form suitable for administering to patients. The pharmacological effects of a medicine, which must occur at the site of action and then disappear after a specific amount of time, are preferable to the once-daily administration of a drug. By analyzing a new drug’s absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) characteristics, one can make risk-based assessments of the medication’s potential for adverse effects [12,13,14]. This contributes to understanding the course of the pharmacokinetic processes and helps in their investigation. We have synthesized a few 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-N’-[(E)substituted-methylidene]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide derivatives by using a rational drug design technique, that can block the activity of DPP-IV. The ADMET study was carried out on each of the newly generated compounds.
All the molecules’ log P values fell within the range of 1.61 to 3.29, which suggests that an optimal amount of lipophilicity was achieved. The Log P value evaluates the permeability of a drug in the body enabling it to reach the target tissues [15]. All of the investigated compounds had molecular weights of less than 500 Da, suggesting that they can easily move across biological membranes [16,17]. To our relief, none of the compounds negatively impacted the validity of the Lipinski Rule of Five. It has been discovered that the total polar surface area (TPSA) and the number of rotatable bonds can differentiate between compounds that are active and that are not when taken orally. Veber’s rule dictates that the TPSA should be less than 140 Å2, and the number of rotatable bonds should be less than 10. None of the synthesized molecules broke Veber’s law in any way. It is an indication that these compounds can be converted into dosage forms that can be taken orally. Despite the fact that many drugs available on the market violate Rule 5, they are still approved by the FDA for oral use. Care must therefore be taken in screening molecules according to the Rule of Five, and a detailed report can be found at https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2018.197 (accessed on 16 November 2022).
The pharmacokinetics and drug-likeness features of each molecule were analyzed and estimated so that additional improvements might be made to these compounds. There was, for instance, no evidence that any of these chemicals could cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The values of log Kp (skin penetration, cm/s) and bioavailability of all the compounds were well within the scope of acceptable ranges. It was observed that all investigated compounds exhibit a high level of gastrointestinal (GI) absorption. Except for the native ligand, none of the compounds broke any of the norms set out by the Ghose, Egan, and Muegge rule. Numerous compounds have been discovered to be inhibitors of cytochrome enzymes, which suggests that these chemicals will likely interfere with the metabolism of other medications. Even more fascinating is that each of the synthesized compounds was a P-gp substrate inhibitor, which suggests that they can prevent drug efflux from the cell. Moreover, acute toxicity predictions showed that all of these compounds belong to class IV of toxicity, which indicates that they are harmful if swallowed (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000) [18].

2.1.2. Molecular Docking

From the very first screening to the application of the Lipinski and Veber rules, the ADMET calculations, and the drug-likeness attributes, none of the molecules had broken the majority of those rules. As a result, these molecules underwent additional screening through molecular docking. Many compounds have demonstrated more powerful interactions and higher binding energies with the target than the native ligand. Table 5 presents details of the interactions and docking scores of the most potent molecules with the DPP-IV enzyme. Furthermore, Table 6 describes the 2D and 3D docking postures of the most potent compounds (docking interactions, docking scores, and binding poses of resting molecules are depicted in the Supplementary File in Tables S1 and S2).
Molecular docking on the human DPP-IV enzyme was used to get further insight into the structure-activity connection of our new derivatives through the molecules’ binding mode. The lowest energy conformers of all the ligands were docked onto the active site grid of the enzyme. The native ligand had a binding free energy of −9.1 kcal/mol and established just one conventional hydrogen bond with TYR662 through the N–H of the amide group. It formed electrostatic bonds with ARG125 and ARG358, and hydrophobic bonds with ARG358 and PHE357.
All investigated compounds demonstrated good binding affinity ranging from −8.9 to −8.0 kcal/mol. From series 1a–1d, molecule 1b showed the most potent interactions with a docking score of −9.4 kcal/mol. It formed five conventional hydrogen bonds and one carbon-hydrogen bond with SER349, SER376, THR351, and GLU378. It additionally displayed two electrostatic (attractive charge) bonds with GLU378. It formed two Pi-donor hydrogen bonds with THR350 and SER376 and exhibited hydrophobic interactions with PHE396, CYS394, and VAL354. From the series 2a–2d, molecule 2b exhibited the most potent binding affinity with a docking score of −9.3 kcal/mol and formed two conventional hydrogen bonds with ARG560 and ASN562. It also formed numerous hydrophobic interactions (Pi-sigma, Pi-Pi T-shaped, alkyl, and Pi-alkyl) with LYS512, ILE529, ARG560, PHE559, PRO475, ALA564, and PHE559.
In the series 3a–3d, compound 3b exhibited potent interactions and showed −9.3 kcal/mol binding affinity. It formed only one conventional hydrogen bond with HIS740 and two electrostatic (attractive charge) bonds with GLU205. It displayed numerous hydrophobic interactions (Pi-Pi stacked, Pi-Pi T-shaped, amide Pi-stacked, alkyl, and Pi-alkyl) with PHE357, TYR662, TYR547, TYR666, SER630; TYR631, LYS554, VAL656, and TYR547. In the series 4a–4d, compound 4a showed the highest binding affinity with the target. It exhibited –9.5 kcal/mol binding affinity and formed only two carbon-hydrogen (halogen, F) bonds with PHE559 and VAL558. It formed hydrophobic interactions with LEU514, PRO510, LYS512, and ILE529. On the other hand, compound 5b from the series 5a–5d exhibited the highest interactions and displayed –9.6 kcal/mol binding affinity. It formed three conventional hydrogen bonds with ILE102, HIS100, and ILE102. It also formed one fluorine halogen bond with ASN74 and hydrophobic interactions with LYS71, TYR105, ILE76, and ILE102. All the aromatic substitutions displayed hydrophobic interactions with the enzyme cavity. The NH of the imidazole ring system has an important function in binding the derivatives to the enzyme cavity. Although most synthesized molecules displayed more potent interactions than native ligands, many displayed more hydrogen bonds, especially molecules with chloro- or fluoro-substitutions. All the designed derivatives exhibited potent interactions and optimized binding affinity with the target. Therefore, all the designed derivatives were subjected to wet lab synthesis and biological evaluation.
The synthesized derivatives were subjected to spectral analysis by FTIR, NMR, and mass spectrometry to confirm the structures. In step I, ethyl 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate was synthesized via the Biginelli reaction, which was then reacted with hydrazine hydrate to get 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4 tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide, in step II. In step III, 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4 tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide was refluxed with different aromatic aldehydes (benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy benzaldehyde, 2-methoxy benzaldehyde, 4-methoxy benzaldehyde) to yield 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-N’-[(E)substituted-methylidene]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d). The purity of the synthesized compounds as well as the completion of the reaction were checked with pre-prepared thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates using n-hexane: ethyl acetate (7:3, 8:2, 6:4) as a mobile phase, and iodine vapor as a visualizing agent.

2.2. In vitro DPP-IV Enzyme Assay

All the synthesized compounds were subjected to in vitro enzyme assays and the results are shown in Table 7.
Results revealed that all of these compounds exhibit excellent in vitro inhibitory potential. Of all the synthesized molecules, 4c (which possesses a 2-fluoro phenyl substitution as –Ar position and a -2-methoxy phenyl substitution as –Ar’) showed 60.40 ± 0.08% inhibition at 50 µM and a 34.94 µM IC50 value, while compound 5b (which possesses a -2,4-difluoro phenyl substitution as –Ar position whereas -2-hydroxy phenyl substitution as –Ar’) displayed 70.70 ± 0.37% inhibition at 50 µM and an IC50 value of 28.13 µM. Compound 4c has a fluoro group that withdraws electrons; this makes it more likely to bind to the active site of the enzyme DPP-IV. Due to the presence of an electron-donating methoxy group at Ar’ of compound 4c, electron density increases on the pyrimidine 2-one ring, which increases the lipophilicity and activity of the compound. Similarly, compound 5b possesses an electron-withdrawing fluoro group and an electron-donating hydroxyl group. The NH of the carbohydrazones 4c and 5b forms hydrogen bonds with the amino acids of the enzyme DPP-IV’s active site. We incorporated various steric, electronic, and hydrophobic groups in the basic nucleus. The synthesized compounds thus showed promising in vitro DPP-IV inhibitory activity.

2.3. In Vivo Antidiabetic Activity

Compounds 1b, 4c, and 5b were chosen for further in vivo antidiabetic research based on virtual screening, in vitro enzymatic assay results, and ultimately to better understand structure-activity relationships. Results obtained from in vivo evaluations of the antihyperglycemic activity of the synthesized compounds are displayed in Table 8. These results show the effect of the selected compounds on fasting blood glucose levels compared to sitagliptin. The graph of the in vivo antidiabetic activity is given in Figure 2.
The DPP-IV inhibitor sitagliptin is a fast-acting, strongly bound, reversible, and competitive inhibitor. Long-term inhibition of >70% after 8 h was demonstrated in ob/ob mice at 10 mg/kg (p.o.). In the same model, duration was correlated with long-lasting effectiveness (35% glucose excursion at 8 h) [19]. Therefore, in the present investigation, a 10 mg/kg dose of sitagliptin was employed. The compounds showed significant hypoglycemic potential in fasting blood glucose in an animal model. After the trial, blood glucose levels were considerably higher in diabetes-control animals than in normal control ones. This difference was dramatically reduced in the diabetic treatment groups (compound 5b at 50 mg/kg and standard treatment with sitagliptin at 10 mg/kg). The serum blood glucose level recovered with compound 5b was significantly lower on day 21 (157.33 ± 5.75 mg/dL) than that of the diabetic control group (280.00 ± 13.29 mg/dL), whereas that of regular sitagliptin was higher (133.50 ± 11.80 mg/dL). As far as in vitro enzyme assay results are concerned, compound 5b exhibited an IC50 value that is >1400 times higher than that of sitagliptin, though, in animals, 5b displayed a very potent activity that was significantly comparable with the sitagliptin. This may be linked to the fact that 5b can inhibit other rate-limiting enzymes contributing to diabetes. This point can be further investigated by performing computational analysis and other in vitro enzyme assays. We are thus aiming to develop more anti-diabetic derivatives considering 5b as a leading nucleus.
The SAR analysis of all the derivatives revealed important insights into essential structural requirements for effective DPP-IV inhibition. Phenyl ring substitutions are necessary for binding at two sites of the DPP IV enzyme. Removal of the 2-hydroxy substitution of the phenyl ring decreases the inhibitory activity of the derivatives. Hence, the introduction of a polar substituent is essential for the activity. In addition, a significant activity increase was observed due to the structural features of the synthesized compounds. The different structural characteristics, such as the electron-withdrawing groups –Cl and –F, make it easier for the synthesized compounds to connect to the active sites of DPP-IV. In contrast, electron-donating groups such as –OH, –CH3, and –OCH3 increase electron density on the derivatives and increase lipophilicity, thus enhancing the activity of the synthesized compounds.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Virtual Screening of the Designed Derivatives

3.1.1. In Silico ADMET Analysis

The Lipinski rule of five and the pharmacokinetic properties of the designed molecules were calculated with the help of the molinspiration and SwissADME servers [20,21]. ProTox-II is a web server that is freely accessible to the public and used to carry out an in silico toxicity prediction of the proposed derivatives (http://tox.charite.de/protox_II accessed on 20 October 2022) [18,22,23].

3.1.2. Molecular Docking

The molecular docking was performed using Autodock Vina 1.1.2 in PyRx 0.8 [24]. The process of ligands and protein purification is described in our previously published paper [25]. The Universal Force Field (UFF) has been assigned to carry out energy reduction and optimization [26]. Figure 3 depicts the structure of the DPP-IV enzyme (PDB ID: 2P8S) acquired from the PDB site. The enzyme structures were refined, purified, and prepared for molecular docking using Discovery Studio Visualizer 2019 [27]. The whole molecular docking approach, including identifying cavities and active amino acid residues, was carried out as reported by Khan et al. [15,28,29,30,31,32].

3.2. Chemistry

All chemicals and reagents used throughout this work were purchased from Lab Trading Laboratories in Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India, and employed as received. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) was used to monitor the reaction, and spots were observed under UV light and exposed to iodine vapors. Melting points (uncorrected) were determined manually using the open capillary technique. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained with a 500 MHz spectrometer (JEOL) with CDCl3 as a solvent and tetramethyl silane (TMS) as an internal standard. Chemical shifts are expressed in δ units or parts per million (ppm), together with the coupling frequencies as singlet (s), double (d), triplet (t), and multiplet (m); 1H–1H coupling constants are given in Hertz. Mass (m/z) spectra of the synthesized compounds were acquired with a Shimadzu LC-MS system. IR spectra of the synthesized compounds were recorded with an Agilent Technologies’ Microlab IR Spectrophotometer.

3.2.1. Synthesis of ethyl 6-Methyl-2-oxo-4- -1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate

A mixture of 1 mmol of an aromatic aldehyde, ethyl acetoacetate, and urea, and catalytic amounts of CuCl2 were ground together for 5–10 min. The solid mass was left standing overnight and later washed with cold water. The product was dried and recrystallized from ethyl alcohol to obtain the pure product [15,29,33].

3.2.2. Synthesis of 6-Methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4 Tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide

The product obtained from step I (ethyl 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carboxylate) (10 mmol) was reacted for 3 h under reflux with 10 mmol of hydrazine hydrate in absolute ethanol. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered and recrystallized from ethanol to give the expected hydrazide [34].

3.2.3. Synthesis of 6-Methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-N’-((E) Substituted-methylidene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide Derivatives

The product obtained from step II (6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-1,2,3,4 tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide) (10 mmol) was reacted for 2 h under reflux with 10 mmol of an aromatic aldehyde and acetic acid in 5 mL of ethanol. The mixture was then allowed to cool. The obtained Schiff bases were collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol as solid products. Purification of the synthesized compounds was performed using column chromatography [25,35]. Pre-prepared TLC plates were employed to test the purity of the synthesized compounds and reaction completeness using n-hexane: ethyl acetate (7:3) as a mobile phase and iodine vapor as a visualization agent. Depicted in Figure 4 is the suggested reaction pathway for synthesizing all the designed derivatives. The different substitutions with compound codes are listed in Table 1 already. The structures of all the synthesized derivatives are depicted in Figure 5.
  • Characterization data
    (E)-N-Benzylidene-6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (1a).
Molecular formula: C19H18N4O2, m.p.: 232–235 °C, Rf value: 0.65. Yield: 62%. MS (m/z): 334.37. FT-IR (cm−1): 3250.10 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.35 (–CONH str.); 1587.78 (C=N str.); 1235.78 (–C–N str.) 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.27, 7.34, 7.39, 7.45, 7.57, 7.62, 7.75, 7.79, 7.85 (m, 10H of C6H5); 7.86, 7.87 (d, 2H OF –NH); 8.69 (s, 1H of –NH); 5.12 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.40 (t, 3H of –CH3); 6.37 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.98 (1C of –CH3); 149.16 (1C of –CH); 120.45, 121.89, 122.99, 123.67, 124.39, 125.33, 126.99, 127.37, 128.31, 129.58, 130.28, 131.71, 132.84, 133.76, 134.86, 135.61 (12C of –C6H5); 52.21, 101.11, 150.61, 156.10 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.93 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2-Hydroxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (1b).
Molecular formula: C19H18N4O3, m.p.: 242–245 °C, Rf value: 0.63. Yield: 55%. MS (m/z): 350.37. FT-IR (cm–1): 3250.56 (–NH str.); 3200–3400 (–OH str.); 3020.35 (Ar–CH str.); 1684.67 (–CONH str.); 1535.45 (C=N str.); 1225.45 (–C–N str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.40, 6.48, 6.53, 6.59, 6.63, 6.78, 6.89, 6.93, 7.23, 7.38, 7.48, 7.57, 7.6 (m, 9H of C6H5); 7.72, 7.84 (d, 2H of –NH); 8.70 (s, 1H of –NH); 11.4 (s, 1H of –OH); 5.50 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.34 (t, 3H of –CH3); 6.56 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.32 (1C of –CH3); 149 (1C of –CH); 120.19, 121.87, 122.47, 123.89, 124.22, 125.78, 126.88, 127.34, 128.39, 129.31, 130.54, 131.67, 132.89, 133.18, 135.39 (12C of –C6H5); 52.23, 101.28, 150.42, 156.77 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.28 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2-Methoxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (1c).
Molecular formula: C20H20N4O3, m.p.: 272–275 °C, Rf value: 0.72. Yield: 54%. MS (m/z): 364.39. FT-IR (cm–1): 3240.56 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2830.56 (–CH str.); 1686.75 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1235.78 (–C–N str.); 1030.45 (–C–O–C str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.71, 6.82, 6.93, 6.99, 7.18, 7.23, 7.38, 7.39, 7.40, 7.49 (m, 9H of C6H5); 7.71, 7.82 (d, 2H of –NH); 8.01 (s, 1H of –NH); 6.0 (1H of –CH); 2.11, 2.23, 2.28, 2.31, 2.35, 2.39 (m, 6H of –CH3). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.45 (1C of –CH3); 57.25 (1C of –OCH3); 149.10 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.21, 122.41, 123.78, 124.28, 125.72, 126.31, 127.38, 128.41, 129.24, 130.78, 131.38, 132.48, 133.43, 134.82, 135.28 (12C of –C6H5); 52.28, 101.73, 150.22, 156.45 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.38 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (1d).
Molecular formula: C20H20N4O3, m.p.: 275–277 °C, Rf value: 0.74. Yield: 48%. MS (m/z): 364.39. FT-IR (cm−1): 3245.86 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2830.56 (–CH str.); 1686.78 (–CONH str.); 1558.78 (C=N str.); 1235.88 (–C–N str.); 1030.45 (–C–O–C str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.78, 6.83, 6.92, 6.99, 7.17, 7.24, 7.31, 7.39, 7.41, 7.46, 7.49 (m, 9H of C6H5); 7.62, 7.85 (d, 2H of –NH); 8.11 (s, 1H of –NH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.20, 1.37, 1.42, 1.57, 1.68, 1.72, 1.89, 199, 2.28, 2.31, 2.40 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.50 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.60 (1C of –CH3); 55.25 (1C of –OCH3) 149.45 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.28, 122.32, 123.67, 124.37, 125.78, 126.31, 127.47, 128.88, 129.99, 130.29, 131.34, 132.67, 133.47, 134.76, 135.21 (12C C6H5); 52.19, 101.25, 150.54, 156.28 (4C of pyrimidine); 163.78 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-Benzylidene-4-(2-chlorophenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidin-5-carbohydrazide (2a).
Molecular formula: C19H17ClN4O2, m.p.: 301–304 °C, Rf value: 0.76. Yield: 63%. MS (m/z): 368.81. FT-IR (cm–1): 3240.56 (–NH str.); 3080.65 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.57 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1235.80 (–C–N str.) 1030.10 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.41, 6.56, 6.62, 6.69, 6.72, 6.83, 6.92, 6.99, 7.12, 7.25 (m, 9H of –C6H5); 7.51, 7.85, 8.05 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.30 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.34 (t, 3H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.92 (1C of –CH3); 149.21 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.19, 122.24, 123.34, 124.13, 125.67, 126.32, 127.46, 128.37, 129.28, 130.44, 132.78, 133.91, 134.19, 135.67 (12C of –C6H5); 52.28, 101.37, 150.17, 156.45 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.27 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-4-(2-Chlorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (2b).
Molecular formula: C19H17ClN4O3, m.p.: 308–310 °C, Rf value: 0.78. Yield: 59%. MS (m/z): 384.81. FT-IR (cm−1): 3290.56 (–NH str.); 3100–3400 (–OH str.); 3020.35 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.75 (–CONH str.); 1535.78 (C=N str.); 1205.45 (–C–N str.); 1025.10 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.22, 6.37, 6.42, 6.55, 6.61, 6.69, 6.74, 6.80, 6.94, 7.21 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.41, 7.82, 9.01 (t, 3H of –NH); 11.52 (s, 1H of –OH); 5.60 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.34 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.51 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.75 (1C of –CH3); 149.34 (1C of –CH); 120.18, 121.22, 122.38, 123.45, 124.28, 125.89, 126.27, 127.88, 128.47, 129.31, 130.29, 132.77, 133.67, 134.99, 135.38 (12C of –C6H5); 52.34, 101.67, 150.77, 156.29 (4C of pyrimidine); 162.38 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-4-(2-Chlorophenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (2c).
Molecular formula: C20H19ClN4O3, m.p.: 284–286 °C, Rf value: 0.61. Yield: 54%. MS (m/z): 398.84. FT-IR (cm−1): 3250.16 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2830.56 (–CH str.); 1685.95 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1225.68 (–C–N str.); 1030.35 (–C–O–C str.); 1068.89 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.42, 6.53, 6.64, 6.73, 6.84, 6.97, 7.10, 7.23 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.62, 7.84, 8.13 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.21, 1.34, 1.47, 1.52, 1.64, 1.78, 1.88, 1.92, 2.17, 2.26, 2.36, 2.42, 2.56, 2.64 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.52 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 17.80 (1C of –CH3); 56.35 (1C of –OCH3); 149.45 (1C of –CH); 120.27, 121.78, 122.45, 123.37, 124.87, 125.28, 126.90, 127.38, 128.61, 129.28, 130.28, 131.67, 132.48, 133.56, 134.56, 135.27 (12C of –C6H5); 52.45, 101.67, 150.28, 156.78 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.28 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-4-(2-Chlorophenyl)-N-(4-methoxybenzylidene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (2d).
Molecular formula: C20H19ClN4O3, m.p.: 286–288 °C, Rf value: 0.58. MS (m/z): 398.84. FT-IR (cm−1): 3250.60 (–NH str.); 3080.35 (Ar–CH str.); 2835.65 (–CH str.); 1682.70 (–CONH str.); 1558.58 (C=N str.); 1235.38 (–C–N str.); 1030.45 (–C–O–C str.); 1068.89 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.41, 6.49, 6.58, 6.63, 6.74, 6.82, 6.95, 7.10, 7.18, 7.23, 7.29 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.3, 7.4, 8.11 (t, 3H of –NH); 6.2 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.21, 1.32, 1.39, 1.43, 158, 1.73, 1.84, 1.95, 1.99, 2.18, 2.31, 2.43, 2.51, 2.59 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.90 (1C of –CH3); 57.25 (1C of –OCH3); 149.45 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.28, 122.78, 123.89, 124.45, 125.61, 126.34, 127.82, 128.45, 129.82, 130.89, 131.28, 132.54, 133.82, 134.67, 135.34 (12C of –C6H5); 52.31, 101.23, 150.71, 156.38 (4C of pyrimidine); 162.61 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-Benzylidene-4-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (3a).
Molecular formula: C19H16Cl2N4O2, m.p.: 313–315 °C, Rf value: 0.59. Yield: 68%. MS (m/z): 403.26. FT-IR (cm−1): 3240.76 (–NH str.); 3070.86 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.75 (–CONH str.); 1557.80 (C=N str.); 1235.88 (–C–N str.) 1060.90 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.42, 6.51, 6.63, 6.78, 6.85, 6.99, 7.14, 7.27 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.93, 8.09, 11.04 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.66 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.33 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.54 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.80 (1C of –CH3); 149.45 (1C of –CH); 120.27, 121.89, 122.63, 123.56, 124.67, 125.72, 126.39, 127.48, 128.39, 129.49, 130.21, 131.89, 132.67, 133.27, 134.88, 135.39 (12C of –C6H5); 52.37, 101.89, 150.26, 156.47 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.28 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)--4-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzyldene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (3b).
Molecular formula: C19H16Cl2N4O2, m.p.: 305–307 °C, Rf value: 0.76. Yield: 56%. MS (m/z): 419.26. FT-IR (cm−1): 3240.61 (–NH str.); 3234.56 (–OH str.); 3080.75 (Ar–CH str.); 1685.75 (–CONH str.); 1556.58 (C=N str.); 1225.38 (–C–N str.); 1086.58 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.49, 6.53, 6.69, 6.82, 6.99, 7.10, 7.19, 7.29 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.60, 7.84, 8.24 (t, 3H of –NH); 11.73 (s, 1H of –OH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.32 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.98 (1C of –CH3); 149.38 (1C of –CH); 120.90, 121.78, 122.65, 123.45, 124.78, 125.28, 126.45, 127.99, 128.34, 129.37, 130.29, 131.78, 132.45, 133.29, 134.67, 135.38 (12C of –C6H5); 52.62, 101.61,150.81, 156.73 (4C of pyrimidine); 161.29 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2,4-Diclorobenzylidene)-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (3c).
Molecular formula: C20H18Cl2N4O3, m.p.: 289–292 °C, Rf value: 0.77. Yield: 57%. MS (m/z): 433.28. FT-IR (cm–1): 3280.60 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2830.56 (–CH str.); 1676.75 (–CONH str.); 1556.68 (C=N str.); 1235.87 (–C–N str.); 1030.45 (–C–O–C str.); 1061.29 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.43, 6.51, 6.64, 6.78, 6.86, 6.92, 6.99, 7.09, 7.19, 7.24 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.52, 7.81, 8.11 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.38 (1H of –CH); 1.21, 1.37, 1.43, 1.58, 1.68, 1.74, 1.88, 1.98, 2.18, 2.22, 2.39, 2.57, 2.64 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.56 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.67 (1C of –CH3); 55.25 (1C of –OCH3) 149.37 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.78, 122.37, 123.84, 124.28, 125.89, 126.27, 127.38, 128.38, 130.48, 132.78, 133.22, 134.56, 135.38 (12C of –C6H5); 52.34, 101.61, 150.37, 156.29 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.39 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2,4-Diclorobenzylidene)-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (3d).
Molecular formula: C20H18Cl2N4O3, m.p.: 288–292 °C, Rf value: 0.57. Yield: 50%. MS (m/z): 433.28. FT-IR (cm−1): 3260.86 (–NH str.); 3070.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2828.86 (–CH str.); 1687.45 (–CONH str.); 1558.30 (C=N str.); 1225.78 (–C–N str.); 1020.85 (–C–O–C str.); 1068.90 (C–Cl str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.41, 6.57, 6.65, 6.71, 6.83, 6.89, 6.99, 7.12, 7.28 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.72, 7.94, 8.21 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.32 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.23, 1.39, 1.48, 1.67, 1.78, 1.98, 2.31, 2.48, 2.59, 2.69 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.56 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.20 (1C of –CH3); 57.35 (1C of –OCH3); 149.89 (1C of –CH); 120.09, 121.89, 122.73, 123.28, 125.29, 126.89, 127.39, 128.54, 129.89, 130.29, 131.67, 132.48, 133.90, 134.87, 135.29 (12C of –C6H5); 52.34, 101.56, 150.13, 156.34 (4C of pyrimidine); 162.28 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-Benzylidene-4-(2-fluorophenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (4a).
Molecular formula: C19H17FN4O2, m.p.: 282–286 °C, Rf value: 0.59. Yield: 53%. MS (m/z): 352.36. FT-IR (cm–1): 3240.86 (–NH str.); 3050.66 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.22 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1235.87 (–C–N str.); 1102.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.40, 6.48, 6.57, 6.61, 6.78, 6.83, 6.99, 7.18, 7.27, 7.29 (m, 9H of –C6H5); 7.53, 7.86, 8.18 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.33 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.31 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.56 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 17.70 (1C of –CH3); 149.45 (1C of –CH); 120.23, 121.41, 122.78, 123.37, 124.72, 125.47, 126.83, 127.34, 128.38, 129.38, 130.45, 131.56, 132.38, 133.67, 134.28, 135.36 (12C of –C6H5); 52.23, 101.45, 150.37, 156.29 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.38 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)--4-(2-Fluorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzyldene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (4b).
Molecular formula: C19H17FN4O3, m.p.: 205–208 °C, Rf value: 0.63. Yield: 58%. MS (m/z): 368.36. FT-IR (cm−1): 3280.45 (–NH str.); 3245.65 (–OH str.); 3020.35 (Ar–CH str.); 1684.67 (–CONH str.); 1535.45 (C=N str.); 1235.45 (–C–N str.); 1062.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.49, 6.59, 6.67, 6.73, 6.86, 6.92, 7.12, 7.19, 7.29 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.52, 8.09, 11.05 (t, 3H of –NH); 11.83 (1H of –OH); 5.32 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.34 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.75 (1C of –CH3); 149.36 (1C of –CH); 120.56, 121.78, 122.78, 123.67, 124.82, 125.38, 126.87, 126.38, 127.48, 128.99, 129.39, 130.29, 131.56, 132.89, 133.27, 134.78, 135.09 (12C of –C6H5); 52.23, 101.34, 150.17, 156.81 (4C of pyrimidine); 161.27 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)--4-(2-Fluorophenyl)-N-(2-methoxybenzyldene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (4c).
Molecular formula: C20H19FN4O3, m.p.: 222–224 °C, Rf value: 0.68. Yield: 62%. MS (m/z): 382.36. FT-IR (cm−1): 3250.68 (–NH str.); 3060.77 (Ar–CH str.); 2820.65 (–CH str.); 1686.80 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1235.78 (–C–N str.); 1025.35 (–C–O–C str.); 962.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.44, 6.53, 6.62, 6.73, 6.89, 6.94, 7.09, 7.19, 7.28 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.63, 7.72, 8.09 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.20, 1.25, 1.37, 1.45, 1.52, 1.67, 1.78, 1.88, 1.92, 2.09, 2.17, 2.33, 2.49, 2.55, 2.62 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.90 (1C of –CH3); 55.45 (1C of –OCH3); 149.02 (1C of –CH); 120.99, 121.87, 122.67, 123.45, 124.27, 125.89, 126.41, 127.38, 128.81, 129.37, 130.89, 131.28, 132.90, 134.22, 135.78 (12C of –C6H5); 52.37, 101.28, 150.90, 156.51 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.38 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)--4-(2-Fluorophenyl)-N-(4-methoxybenzyldene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (4d).
Molecular formula: C20H19FN4O3, m.p.: 313–316 °C, Rf value: 0.67. Yield: 54%. MS (m/z): 382.36. FT-IR (cm–1): 3260.56 (–NH str.); 3080.20 (Ar–CH str.); 2820.16 (–CH str.); 1686.35 (–CONH str.); 1557.80 (C=N str.); 1236.18 (–C–N str.); 1031.40 (–C–O–C str.); 982.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.42, 6.49, 6.52, 6.68, 6.78, 6.82, 6.93, 7.05, 7.15, 7.29 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.63, 7.82, 8.25 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.22, 1.34, 1.45, 1.51, 1.68, 1.88, 1.98, 2.09, 2.19, 2.28, 2.37, 2.44, 2.58, 2.67 (m, 6H of –CH3); 6.56 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.25 (1C of –CH3); 57.25 (1C of –OCH3); 149.34 (1C of –CH); 120.34, 121.89, 122.34, 123.67, 124.98, 125.48, 126.89, 128.49, 129.33, 130.29, 131.87, 133.29, 134.77, 135.64 (12C of –C6H5); 52.45, 101.28, 150.38, 156.62 (4C of pyrimidine); 163.28 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-Benzylidene-4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (5a).
Molecular formula: C19H16F2N4O2, m.p.: 303–306 °C, Rf value: 0.49. Yield: 65%. MS (m/z): 370.35. FT-IR (cm−1): 3240.56 (–NH str.); 3080.20 (Ar–CH str.); 1676.85 (–CONH str.); 1556.68 (C=N str.); 1225.35 (–C–N str.) 1062.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.40, 6.48, 6.55, 6.62, 6.79, 6.83, 6.99, 7.03, 7.26, 7.20 (m, 8H of –C6H5); 7.72, 7.83, 8.14 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.32 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.31 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.52 (s, 1H of –CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.67 (1C of –CH3); 149.34 (1C of –CH); 120.90, 121.45, 122.67, 123.56, 124.38, 125.89, 126.82, 127.38, 128.49, 129.39, 130.29, 132.89, 133.45, 134.71, 135.45 (12C of –C6H5); 52.21, 101.39, 150.09, 156.03 (4C of pyrimidine); 164 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)--4-(2,4-Difluorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxybenzyldene)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (5b).
Molecular formula: C19H16F2N4O3, m.p.: 318–321 °C, Rf value: 0.72. Yield: 63%. MS (m/z): 386.32. FT-IR (cm−1): 3290.56 (–NH str.); 3200–3400 (–OH str.); 3005.10 (Ar–CH str.); 1686.75 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1235.78 (–C–N str.); 1105.88 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.80, 6.89, 6.91, 7.08, 7.14, 7.21, 7.38, 7.45, 7.51, 7.59 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.87, 7.52, 8.30 (t, 3H of –NH); 11.30 (s, 1H of –OH); 5.33 (s, 1H of –CH); 2.31 (s, 3H of –CH3); 6.58 (s, 1H of CH). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.75 (1C of –CH3); 149.09 (1C of –CH); 120.89, 121.27, 122.34, 123.67, 124.38, 125.38, 126.78, 127.38, 128.38, 129.89, 130.29, 131.88, 132.56, 133.29, 135.33 (12C of –C6H5); 52.88, 101.34, 150.41, 156.37 (4C of pyrimidine); 162.45 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2,4-Difluorobenzylidene)-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (5c).
Molecular formula: C20H18F2N4O3, m.p.: 275–278 °C, Rf value: 0.61. MS (m/z): 400.37. FT-IR (cm–1): 3230.86 (–NH str.); 3080.56 (Ar–CH str.); 2825.86 (–CH str.); 1686.65 (–CONH str.); 1557.68 (C=N str.); 1235.68 (–C–N str.); 1030.45 (–C–O–C str.); 1062.35 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.40, 6.48, 6.55, 6.62, 6.78, 6.82, 6.92, 7.03, 7.19, 7.21 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.71, 7.83, 8.30 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.32 (1H of –CH); 1.20, 1.31, 1.39, 1.47, 1.51, 1.68, 1.78, 1.89, 1.93, 2.18, 2.27, 2.39, 2.48, 2.55, 2.60 (m, 6H of –CH3). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 17.98 (1C of –CH3); 57.25 (1C of –OCH3); 149.34 (1C of –CH); 120.90, 121.28, 122.45, 123.47, 125.38, 126.89, 127.99, 128.39, 129.99, 130.29, 131.77, 132.78, 133.99, 134.28, 135.77 (12C of –C6H5); 52.34, 101.23, 150.78, 156.44 (4C of pyrimidine); 164.45 (1C of –C=O).
  • (E)-N-(2,4-Difluorobenzylidene)-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide (5d).
Molecular formula: C20H18F2N4O3, m.p.: 301–304 °C, Rf value: 0.58. MS (m/z): 400.37. FT-IR (cm−1): 3255.46 (–NH str.); 3050.66 (Ar–CH str.); 2840.65 (–CH str.); 1686.75 (–CONH str.); 1557.78 (C=N str.); 1232.78 (–C–N str.); 1035.50 (–C–O–C str.); 1065.50 (C–F str.). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.41, 6.52, 6.67, 6.78, 6.88, 6.93, 6.98, 7.09, 7.27 (m, 7H of –C6H5); 7.52, 7.71, 8.58 (t, 3H of –NH); 5.34 (s, 1H of –CH); 1.20, 1.31, 1.42, 1.56, 1.67, 1.76, 1.83, 1.98, 2.18, 2.37, 2.45, 2.58, 2.63 (m, 6H of –CH3). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 18.80 (1C of –CH3); 55.45 (1C of –OCH3); 149.78 (1C of –CH); 120.34, 121.89, 122.38, 123.84, 124.77, 124.39, 125.89, 126.29, 127.99, 128.62, 129.77, 130.98, 131.78, 133.87, 134.67, 135.67 (12C of –C6H5); 52.67, 101.34, 150.23, 156.98 (4C of pyrimidine); 161.45 (1C of –C=O).

3.3. In Vitro DPP-IV Enzymatic Assay

The prepared compounds were investigated in vitro for their ability to inhibit the DPP-IV enzyme, and the detailed method is already described in our previously published paper [25]. Sitagliptin was used as a positive control, as a DPP-IV inhibitor. Both the percentage inhibition at 50 µM and IC50 values in µM were determined for all the tested compounds [36]. The pipetting summary for performing the DPP-IV enzymatic assay as given in the assay protocol can be accessed at https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/insert/700210.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2022).

3.4. In Vivo Antidiabetic Activity

3.4.1. Animals and Ethical Approvals

The antihyperglycemic potential of certain compounds was investigated in Wistar rats. STZ-induced diabetic rats were employed for the antihyperglycemic testing. The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) in New Delhi, India (Protocol Number: IAEC/MCP/009/2020). During the research period, the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) and IAEC criteria for animal care were followed.

3.4.2. Acute Toxicity Studies

Acute toxicity studies were performed as per the OECD guideline 423. For compounds 1b, 4c, and 5b, three groups of six rats weighing 80–120 g were starved overnight and given the test compounds orally at doses of 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg body weight. The animals were monitored for 72 h, for symptoms of acute toxicity, such as increased or reduced motor activity, tremors, convulsions, and drowsiness, among others. It was observed that at a dosage of 500 mg/kg body weight, more than half of the animals died. As a result, the OECD-recommended dosage for assessing the antidiabetic action was set at 50 mg/kg (i.e., one-tenth of the 2000 mg/kg body weight) [37].

3.4.3. STZ-Induced T2DM Model

Rats were given a high-fat diet after one week of acclimation. Diabetes was induced in the animals as per the method each described in [25]. Rats were then divided into six groups with six animals. Group I served as normal control with normal rats receiving the vehicle only. Group II served as diabetes control in which rats received the vehicle only. Group III served as standard and received sitagliptin at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight (b.w.). Groups IV, V, and VI served as test groups and received compounds 1b, 5b, and 4c, respectively, at doses of 50 mg/kg b.w. The diabetic rats were given the tested compound suspended in 0.5% w/v CMC every day for 21 days. On days 1, 7, 14, and 21, blood samples were taken from the tail veins of each animal that had fasted overnight. A glucometer was used to measure blood glucose levels [38,39].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have designed and developed a few compounds that can inhibit DPP-IV. The 6-methyl-2-oxo-4-substituted-N’-((E)substituted-methylidene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine-5-carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d) were synthesized and characterized by spectral analysis. From the very first screening to the application of the Lipinski rule, the Veber rule, the ADMET calculations, and the drug-likeness attributes, none of these molecules had broken the majority of the drug-likeness rules. All the designed derivatives exhibited potent interactions and optimized binding affinity with the target enzyme. Therefore, wet lab synthesis and biological assessment were performed on all the proposed derivatives. In vitro DPP-IV inhibitory effects of the synthesized compounds were promising. The antihyperglycemic activity of the developed compounds in fasting blood glucose in animal models demonstrates that they have excellent hypoglycemic potential. As the developed molecules demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activities in the present study, we have concluded that this nucleus can be explored further and treated as a lead nucleus for developing novel antidiabetic agents. SAR analysis of all the derivatives revealed important insights into the essential structural requirements for effective DPP-IV inhibition. Phenyl ring substitutions are necessary for the binding at the two sites of the DPP IV enzyme. Hence, the introduction of a polar substituent is essential for the activity. In addition, a significant increase in activity was observed due to certain structural characteristics of the synthesized compounds. Different structural features, such as electron-withdrawing groups, for example –Cl and –F, facilitate the binding of the synthesized compounds to the active sites of DPP-IV. In contrast, electron-donating groups, such as –OH, –CH3, and –OCH3, increase the electron density of the derivatives and increase their lipophilicity, thus enhancing the activity of the synthesized compounds. By studying the structural requirements necessary for their activity, researchers can thus develop more carbohydrazide derivatives as potential DPP-IV inhibitors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28010149/s1, Table S1: The binding interactions of the molecules with the target enzyme; Table S2: 2D- and 3D-binding postures of the molecules.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B.J., S.B.J., M.M.R.S. and M.F.N.A.; methodology, P.B.J., M.Z., F.I. and S.L.K.; software, P.B.J., S.B.J., M.S.M., S.L.K., P.J. and N.H.; formal analysis, P.B.J. and S.L.K.; investigation, P.B.J., M.Z., F.I., P.J. and S.R.; resources, P.B.J. and N.H.; data curation, P.B.J. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, P.B.J.; S.B.J., M.Z., F.I. and S.L.K.; writing—review and editing, P.B.J., S.B.J., M.S.M., M.Z., F.I., S.L.K., P.J., N.H., S.R, L.C.M., M.M.R.S. and M.F.N.A.; visualization, P.B.J., P.J. and S.L.K..; supervision, P.B.J., M.M.R.S. and M.F.N.A.; project administration, P.B.J.; funding acquisition, P.B.J., M.M.R.S. and M.F.N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to express their sincere thanks to BCUD Savitribai Phule Pune University for sanctioning financial grants under ASPIRE research program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hawash, M.; Jaradat, N.; Shekfeh, S.; Abualhasan, M.; Eid, A.M.; Issa, L. Molecular Docking, Chemo-Informatic Properties, Alpha-Amylase, and Lipase Inhibition Studies of Benzodioxol Derivatives. BMC Chem. 2021, 15, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jaradat, N.; Khasati, A.; Hawi, M.; Hawash, M.; Shekfeh, S.; Qneibi, M.; Eid, A.M.; Arar, M.; Qaoud, M.T. Antidiabetic, Antioxidant, and Anti-Obesity Effects of Phenylthio-Ethyl Benzoate Derivatives, and Molecular Docking Study Regarding α-Amylase Enzyme. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arulmozhi, D.K.; Portha, B. GLP-1 Based Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 28, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Deacon, C.F. A Review of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors. Hot Topics from Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Gallwitz, B. Clinical Use of DPP-4 Inhibitors. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kirby, M.; Yu, D.M.T.; O’Connor, S.P.; Gorrell, M.D. Inhibitor Selectivity in the Clinical Application of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibition. Clin. Sci. 2010, 118, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kaur, J.; Singla, R.; Jaitak, V. In Silico Study of Flavonoids as DPP-4 and α-Glucosidase Inhibitors. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2017, 14, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bittle, P.A. Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes & Chronic & Kidney Disease. Nurse Pract. 2017, 42, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Richter, B.; Bandeira-Echtler, E.; Bergerhoff, K.; Lerch, C.L. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barnett, A. DPP-4 Inhibitors and Their Potential Role in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2006, 60, 1454–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sesti, G.; Avogaro, A.; Belcastro, S.; Bonora, B.M.; Croci, M.; Daniele, G.; Dauriz, M.; Dotta, F.; Formichi, C.; Frontoni, S.; et al. Ten Years of Experience with DPP-4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2019, 56, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akhtar, W.; Khan, M.F.; Verma, G.; Shaquiquzzaman, M.; Rizvi, M.A.; Mehdi, S.H.; Akhter, M.; Alam, M.M. Therapeutic Evolution of Benzimidazole Derivatives in the Last Quinquennial Period. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 126, 705–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kamal, A.; Shaik, A.B.; Jain, N.; Kishor, C.; Nagabhushana, A.; Supriya, B.; Bharath Kumar, G.; Chourasiya, S.S.; Suresh, Y.; Mishra, R.K.; et al. Design and Synthesis of Pyrazole-Oxindole Conjugates Targeting Tubulin Polymerization as New Anticancer Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 92, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Barret, R. Lipinski’s Rule of Five. In Therapeutical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, S.; Kale, M.; Siddiqui, F.; Nema, N. Novel Pyrimidine-Benzimidazole Hybrids with Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties and Potential Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease and Spike Glycoprotein. Digit. Chin. Med. 2021, 4, 102–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Krzywinski, M.; Altman, N. Points of Significance: Significance, P Values and t-Tests. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 1041–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banerjee, P.; Eckert, A.O.; Schrey, A.K.; Preissner, R. ProTox-II: A Webserver for the Prediction of Toxicity of Chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W257–W263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Davis, J.; Singh, S.; Sethi, S.; Roy, S.; Mittra, S.; Rayasam, G.; Bansal, V.; Sattigeri, J.; Ray, A. Nature of Action of Sitagliptin, the Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitor in Diabetic Animals. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2010, 42, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Shoemaker, B.A.; Thiessen, P.A.; Yu, B.; et al. PubChem in 2021: New Data Content and Improved Web Interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1388–D1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A Free Web Tool to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Drug-Likeness and Medicinal Chemistry Friendliness of Small Molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Eswaramoorthy, R.; Hailekiros, H.; Kedir, F.; Endale, M. In Silico Molecular Docking, Dft Analysis and Admet Studies of Carbazole Alkaloid and Coumarins from Roots of Clausena Anisata: A Potent Inhibitor for Quorum Sensing. Adv. Appl. Bioinform. Chem. 2021, 14, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. James, J.P.; Mathew, J.B.; Bhat, K.I.; Kumar, P.; Aiswarya, T.C. Design And Synthesis Of Novel Pyrimidine Analogs As Anti-Tubercular Agents Targeting Thymidine Kinase Domain. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021, 11, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dallakyan, S.; Olson, A.J. Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1263, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chavan, P.A.; Jadhav, S.B. Synthesis, Characterization and Screening of Some Novel 2-Methyl-N’- [(Z)-Substituted-Phenyl Ethylidene] Imidazo [1, 2-a] Pyridine-3-Carbohy Drazide Derivatives as DPP-IV Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2021, 19, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rappé, A.K.; Casewit, C.J.; Colwell, K.S.; Goddard, W.A.; Skiff, W.M. UFF, a Full Periodic Table Force Field for Molecular Mechanics and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024–10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Accelrys Software, Inc. Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Release 3.1; Accelrys Software, Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 98–104. [Google Scholar]
  28. Khan, S.L.; Siddiui, F.A. Beta-Sitosterol: As Immunostimulant, Antioxidant and Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Arch. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 2, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Siddiqui, F.A.; Khan, S.L.; Marathe, R.P.; Nema, N.V. Design, Synthesis, and In Silico Studies of Novel N-(2-Aminophenyl)-2,3- Diphenylquinoxaline-6-Sulfonamide Derivatives Targeting Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein and Their Evaluation as Antimicrobial and Antimalarial Agents. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2021, 18, 915–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chaudhari, R.N.; Khan, S.L.; Chaudhary, R.S.; Jain, S.P.; Siddiqui, F.A. Β-Sitosterol: Isolation from Muntingia Calabura Linn Bark Extract, Structural Elucidation And Molecular Docking Studies As Potential Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (COVID-19). Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2020, 13, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, S.L.; Siddiqui, F.A.; Shaikh, M.S.; Nema, N.V.; Shaikh, A.A. Discovery of Potential Inhibitors of the Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of Pandemic Disease-Causing SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein from Triphala through Molecular Docking. Curr. Chin. Chem. 2021, 1, e220321192390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khan, S.L.; Sonwane, G.M.; Siddiqui, F.A.; Jain, S.P.; Kale, M.A.; Borkar, V.S. Discovery of Naturally Occurring Flavonoids as Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) Inhibitors with the Aid of Computational Chemistry. Indo Glob. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shntaif, A.H.; Khan, S.; Tapadiya, G.; Chettupalli, A.; Saboo, S.; Shaikh, M.S.; Siddiqui, F.; Amara, R.R. Rational Drug Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel N-(2-Arylaminophenyl)-2,3-Diphenylquinoxaline-6-Sulfonamides as Potential Antimalarial, Antifungal, and Antibacterial Agents. Digit. Chin. Med. 2021, 4, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bhoi, M.N.; Borad, M.A.; Pithawala, E.A.; Modi, S.; Patel, H.D. Synthesis of N’-(7-Chloroquinolin-4-Yl)-6-Methyl-2-Oxo-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydropyrimidine-5-Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potent Antibacterial Agents. Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 2015, 56, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kumar, R.; Mittal, A.; Ramachandran, U. Design and Synthesis of 6-Methyl-2-Oxo-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-Pyrimidine-5-Carboxylic Acid Derivatives as PPARγ Activators. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4613–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barreira da Silva, R.; Ingersoll, M.; Albert, M. Measurement of Dipeptidylpeptidase Activity in Vitro and in Vivo. Bio-Protocol 2017, 7, e2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wilhelm, K.P.; Maibach, H.I. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. In Dermatotoxicology, 8th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 497–499. ISBN 9781841848570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cassano, V.; Leo, A.; Tallarico, M.; Nesci, V.; Cimellaro, A.; Fiorentino, T.V.; Citraro, R.; Hribal, M.L.; De Sarro, G.; Perticone, F.; et al. Metabolic and Cognitive Effects of Ranolazine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Data from an in Vivo Model. Nutrients 2020, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Okamoto, T.; Kanemoto, N.; Ohbuchi, Y.; Okano, M.; Fukui, H.; Sudo, T. Characterization of STZ-Induced Type 2 Diabetes in Zucker Fatty Rats. Exp. Anim. 2008, 57, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 00149 g001 550
Figure 1. The structures of approved DPP-IV inhibitors and designing approach to design some carbohydrazide derivatives.
Figure 1. The structures of approved DPP-IV inhibitors and designing approach to design some carbohydrazide derivatives.
Molecules 28 00149 g001
Molecules 28 00149 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of compounds 1b, 4c, and 5b on blood glucose levels of STZ-induced diabetic rats. The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean) of six rats. The levels of significance are indicated as *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and *** p < 0.001 when compared to the diabetic control group.
Figure 2. Effect of compounds 1b, 4c, and 5b on blood glucose levels of STZ-induced diabetic rats. The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean) of six rats. The levels of significance are indicated as *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and *** p < 0.001 when compared to the diabetic control group.
Molecules 28 00149 g002
Molecules 28 00149 g003 550
Figure 3. The crystal structure of the human dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 complexed with a cyclohexylamine inhibitor where Chain A: highlighted in multicolor; Chain B: highlighted in yellow color.
Figure 3. The crystal structure of the human dipeptidyl peptidase IV/CD26 complexed with a cyclohexylamine inhibitor where Chain A: highlighted in multicolor; Chain B: highlighted in yellow color.
Molecules 28 00149 g003
Molecules 28 00149 g004 550
Figure 4. Proposed reaction scheme for the synthesis of carbohydrazide derivatives.
Figure 4. Proposed reaction scheme for the synthesis of carbohydrazide derivatives.
Molecules 28 00149 g004
Molecules 28 00149 g005 550
Figure 5. The structures of synthesized derivatives.
Figure 5. The structures of synthesized derivatives.
Molecules 28 00149 g005
Table
Table 1. Different substitutions of titled derivatives and compound codes.
Table 1. Different substitutions of titled derivatives and compound codes.
CodesArAr’CodesArAr’
1aPhenylPhenyl3c2,4-dichlorophenyl2-methoxyphenyl
1bPhenyl2-hydroxyphenyl3d2,4-dichlorophenyl4-methoxyphenyl
1cPhenyl2-methoxyphenyl4a2-fluorophenylPhenyl
1dPhenyl4-methoxyphenyl4b2-fluorophenyl2-hydroxyphenyl
2a2-chlorophenylPhenyl4c2-fluorophenyl2-methoxyphenyl
2b2-chlorophenyl2-hydroxyphenyl4d2-fluorophenyl4-methoxyphenyl
2c2-chlorophenyl2-methoxyphenyl5a2,4-difluorophenylPhenyl
2d2-chlorophenyl4-methoxyphenyl5b2,4-difluorophenyl2-hydroxyphenyl
3a2,4-dichlorophenylPhenyl5c2,4-difluorophenyl2-methoxyphenyl
3b2,4-dichlorophenyl2-hydroxyphenyl5d2,4-difluorophenyl4-methoxyphenyl
Table
Table 2. Calculations of Lipinski’s rule of five and Veber’s rule for carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Table 2. Calculations of Lipinski’s rule of five and Veber’s rule for carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Compound CodesLipinski Rule of FiveVeber’s Rule
Log P
(<5)		Mol. Wt.
(<500 Da)		HBA
(<10)		HBD
(<5)s		ViolationsTotal Polar Surface Area (Å2)
(<140 Å2)		No. of Rotatable Bonds
(<10)
NL3.29419.371001059.9703
1a1.97334.3733082.595
1b1.61350.37440102.825
1c2.1364.443091.826
1d2.07364.443091.826
2a2.44368.8233082.595
2b2.06384.82440102.825
2c2.61398.8443091.826
2d2.59398.8443091.826
3a2.98403.2633082.595
3b2.58419.26440102.825
3c3.16433.2943091.826
3d3.12433.2943091.826
4a2.24352.3643082.595
4b1.86368.36540102.825
4c2.41382.3953091.826
4d2.38382.3953091.826
5a2.56370.3553082.595
5b2.19386.35640102.825
5c2.73400.3863091.826
5d2.7400.3863091.826
Where: NL, Native ligand; Mol. Wt., molecular weight; HBA, hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, hydrogen bond donors.
Table
Table 3. Pharmacokinetics and drug-like characteristics of carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Table 3. Pharmacokinetics and drug-like characteristics of carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Compound CodesPharmacokineticsDrug-Likeness
GI abs.BBB pen.P-gp sub.CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9CYP2D6CYP3A4Log Kp (Skin Permeation, cm/s)GhoseEganMueggeBioavailability Score
Inhibitors
NLHYYNNNYN–7.43YYY0.55
1aHNYNNNNN–6.870000.55
1bHNYNNNNN–7.220000.55
1cHNYNNYNN–7.070000.55
1dHNYNNYNN–7.070000.55
2aHNYNNYNN–6.630000.55
2bHNYNNNNN–6.990000.55
2cHNYNNYNY–6.840000.55
2dHNYNNYNY–6.840000.55
3aHNYYYYNY–6.40000.55
3bHNYYNNNY–6.750000.55
3cHNYYYYNY–6.60000.55
3dHNYYYYNY–6.60000.55
4aHNYNNNNN–6.910000.55
4bHNYNNNNN–7.260000.55
4cHNYNNYNY–7.110000.55
4dHNYNNYNY–7.110000.55
5aHNYNNNNN-6.950000.55
5bHNYNNNNN–7.290000.55
5cHNYNNYNY–7.150000.55
5dHNYNNYNY–7.150000.55
Where: NL, Native ligand; GI abs., gastrointestinal absorption; BBB pen., blood-brain barrier penetration; P-gp sub., p-glycoprotein substrate; H, High; Y, Yes; N, No.
Table
Table 4. Toxicity prediction of carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Table 4. Toxicity prediction of carbohydrazide derivatives (1a–5d).
Compound CodesParameters
LD50 (mg/kg)Toxicity ClassPrediction Accuracy (%)Hepatotoxicity (Probability)Carcinogenicity (Probability)Immunotoxicity (Probability)Mutagenicity (Probability)Cytotoxicity (Probability)
NL800423I (0.60)A (0.50)A (0.80)I (0.65)I (0.71)
1a711454.26A (0.64)A (0.71)I (0.98)I (0.60)I (0.72)
1b1644454.26A (0.64)A (0.66)I (0.65)I (0.62)I (0.78)
1c1880454.26A (0.61)A (0.60)A (0.55)I (0.59)I (0.80)
1d1880454.26A (0.62)A (0.60)I (0.89)I (0.59)I (0.77)
2a1000454.26A (0.59)A (0.52)I (0.96)I (0.69)I (0.76)
2b1000423A (0.62)A (0.52)A (0.69)I (0.70)I (0.79)
2c1000423A (0.61)I (0.53)A (0.84)I (0.68)I (0.77)
2d11904100A (0.69)I (0.62)A (0.96)I (0.97)I (0.93)
3a1000454.26A (0.59)A (0.52)I (0.93)I (0.69)I (0.76)
3b11904100A (0.69)I (0.62)A (0.96)I (0.97)I (0.93)
3c1000423A (0.61)I (0.53)A (0.91)I (0.68)I (0.77)
3d1000423A (0.61)I (0.53)A (0.50)I (0.68)I (0.77)
4a1000423A (0.60)A (0.57)I (0.97)I (0.68)I (0.77)
4b1644423A (0.64)A (0.55)A (0.59)I (0.67)I (0.79)
4c711423A (0.63)I (0.51)A (0.78)I (0.66)I (0.78)
4d1880423A (0.63)I (0.51)I (0.76)I (0.66)I (0.78)
5a1000423A (0.60)A (0.57)I (0.60)I (0.68)I (0.77)
5b1644423A (0.64)A (0.55)A (0.97)I (0.67)I (0.79)
5c711423A (0.63)I (0.51)A (0.98)I (0.66)I (0.78)
5d1880423A (0.63)I (0.51)A (0.91)I (0.66)I (0.78)
Where: NL, Native ligand; I, Inactive; A, Active.
Table
Table 5. The binding interactions of the most potent molecules with the target enzyme.
Table 5. The binding interactions of the most potent molecules with the target enzyme.
Active
Amino Acid
Residues		Atom from LigandBond Length (Å)Bond TypeBond CategoryLigand EnergyDocking Scores
(kcal/mol)
Native Ligand
TYR662N-H1.66907Hydrogen BondConventional Hydrogen Bond447.3−9.1
ARG125Pi-Orbitals4.39768ElectrostaticPi-Cation
ARG3583.52293
ARG3585.41244HydrophobicPi-Alkyl
PHE357Aromatic Carbon3.79334
1b
GLU378N4.2858ElectrostaticAttractive Charge299.89−9.4
GLU378N4.09602
SER349H2.37918Hydrogen BondConventional Hydrogen Bond
SER376H2.55398
SER376NH2.862
THR351O1.98084
THR351O1.67832
GLU378C3.06114Carbon Hydrogen Bond
THR350Pi-Orbitals3.1604Pi-Donor Hydrogen Bond
SER3763.06845
PHE3964.9139HydrophobicPi-Pi T-shaped
CYS394Alkyl5.29122Pi-Alkyl
VAL3545.28734
2b
ARG560NH2.90874Hydrogen BondConventional Hydrogen Bond343.49−9.3
ASN562H2.81998
LYS512Pi-Orbitals3.51422HydrophobicPi-Sigma
ILE5293.43887
ARG5603.75323
PHE5595.21502Pi-Pi T-shaped
PRO475Cl5.41082Alkyl
LYS512Cl4.09612
ALA564Pi-Orbitals5.11889Pi-Alkyl
PRO4754.72305
PHE5595.12368
3b
GLU205N5.12407ElectrostaticAttractive Charge340.69−9.3
GLU205N5.23339
HIS740H2.57758Hydrogen BondConventional Hydrogen Bond
PHE357Pi-Orbitals3.79816HydrophobicPi-Pi Stacked
TYR6624.0191
TYR5474.68336
TYR6664.89163Pi-Pi T-shaped
SER630; TYR6314.99633Amide-Pi Stacked
LYS554Cl4.43461Alkyl
VAL656Pi-Orbitals5.41552Pi-Alkyl
TYR547Cl4.69875
TYR547Cl4.67797
4a
PHE559F3.12032Hydrogen Bond;HalogenCarbon Hydrogen Bond;Halogen (Fluorine)316.76−9.5
VAL558F3.51875HalogenHalogen (Fluorine)
LEU514Pi-Orbitals4.68451HydrophobicPi-Alkyl
PRO5105.49372
LYS5124.13088
ILE5294.76619
5b
ILE102H2.81295Hydrogen BondConventional Hydrogen Bond316.62−9.6
HIS100H1.85943
ILE102O2.2207
ASN74F3.14132HalogenHalogen (Fluorine)
LYS71Pi-Orbitals4.97015ElectrostaticPi-Cation
TYR1055.06176HydrophobicPi-Pi T-shaped
ILE765.43513Pi-Alkyl
ILE1025.10056
Table
Table 6. The 2D- and 3D-binding postures of the most potent molecules.
Table 6. The 2D- and 3D-binding postures of the most potent molecules.
3D-Docking Poses2D-Docking Poses
Native Ligand
Molecules 28 00149 i001Molecules 28 00149 i002
Compound 1b
Molecules 28 00149 i003Molecules 28 00149 i004
Compound 2b
Molecules 28 00149 i005Molecules 28 00149 i006
Compound 3b
Molecules 28 00149 i007Molecules 28 00149 i008
Compound 4a
Molecules 28 00149 i009Molecules 28 00149 i010
Compound 5b
Molecules 28 00149 i011Molecules 28 00149 i012
Table
Table 7. In vitro enzyme assay of synthesized compounds.
Table 7. In vitro enzyme assay of synthesized compounds.
Compound Code% Inhibition at 50 µMIC50
(µM)		Compound Code% Inhibition at 50 µMIC50
(µM)
1a40.74 ± 0.3858.95 ± 0.00123c61.00 ± 0.0833.73 ± 0.0024
1b42.69 ± 0.2854.73 ± 0.00253d63.25 ± 0.0532.38 ± 0.0021
1c56.47 ± 0.3739.72 ± 0.00274a64.78 ± 0.3330.47 ± 0.0025
1d57.74 ± 0.3838.26 ± 0.00504b63.80 ± 0.1631.75 ± 0.0027
2a61.25 ± 0.1632.41 ± 0.00334c60.40 ± 0.0834.94 ± 0.0016
2b65.50 ± 0.0831.93 ± 0.00294d57.74 ± 0.3838.62 ± 0.0025
2c63.25 ± 0.0533.97 ± 0.00255a44.20 ± 0.2865.31 ± 0.0021
2d64.78 ±0.3331.72 ± 0.00215b70.70 ± 0.3728.13 ± 0.0029
3a61.25 ± 0.1633.91 ± 0.00295c58.54 ± 0.2737.63 ± 0.0026
3b61.00 ± 0.0833.79 ± 0.00215d62.28 ± 0.2934.13 ± 0.0027
Sitagliptin101.7 ± 0.090.018 ± 0.0012---
All values are expressed as the means of three independent determinations.
Table
Table 8. Comparison of the effect of 1b, 4c, and 5b on fasting blood glucose levels to that of the standard antidiabetic drug “sitagliptin”.
Table 8. Comparison of the effect of 1b, 4c, and 5b on fasting blood glucose levels to that of the standard antidiabetic drug “sitagliptin”.
Treatment GroupFasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL) ± SEM
On Day 1On Day 7On Day 14On Day 21
Diabetic control265.33 ± 6.27269.66 ± 7.96275.33 ± 1 0.04280.00 ± 13.29
Sitagliptin (10 mg/kg)240.16 ± 9.88178.66 ± 6.92 ***175.16 ± 8.61 ***133.50 ± 11.80 ***
Compound 1b (50 mg/kg)261.00 ± 8.44215.03 ± 3.29 *187.05 ± 6.48 *160.12 ± 6.18 *
Compound 5b (50 mg/kg)253.83 ± 4.49182.00 ± 8.11 *167.16 ± 6.23 **157.33 ± 5.75 **
Compound 4c (50 mg/kg)264.66 ± 5.70237.16 ± 9.01194.83 ± 4.81 *169.66 ± 8.53 *
The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean) of six rats. * significantly differs from diabetic control group; the levels of significance are indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jadhav, P.B.; Jadhav, S.B.; Zehravi, M.; Mubarak, M.S.; Islam, F.; Jeandet, P.; Khan, S.L.; Hossain, N.; Rashid, S.; Ming, L.C.; et al. Virtual Screening, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Some Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors. Molecules 2023, 28, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010149

AMA Style

Jadhav PB, Jadhav SB, Zehravi M, Mubarak MS, Islam F, Jeandet P, Khan SL, Hossain N, Rashid S, Ming LC, et al. Virtual Screening, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Some Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors. Molecules. 2023; 28(1):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jadhav, Prerana B., Shailaja B. Jadhav, Mehrukh Zehravi, Mohammad S. Mubarak, Fahadul Islam, Philippe Jeandet, Sharuk L. Khan, Nazmul Hossain, Salma Rashid, Long Chiau Ming, and et al. 2023. "Virtual Screening, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Some Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors" Molecules 28, no. 1: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010149

APA Style

Jadhav, P. B., Jadhav, S. B., Zehravi, M., Mubarak, M. S., Islam, F., Jeandet, P., Khan, S. L., Hossain, N., Rashid, S., Ming, L. C., Sarker, M. M. R., & Azlina, M. F. N. (2023). Virtual Screening, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Some Carbohydrazide Derivatives as Potential DPP-IV Inhibitors. Molecules, 28(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010149

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop