Next Article in Journal
Target Identification of 22-(4-Pyridinecarbonyl) Jorunnamycin A, a Tetrahydroisoquinoline Derivative from the Sponge Xestospongia sp., in Mediating Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cell Apoptosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanism and Selectivity of Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 on Metalloporphyrin Catalysts from DFT Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Rotation—A Reliable Parameter for Authentication of Honey?
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Iron-NDC Framework with a Cage Structure and an Optothermal Conversion in NIR Window
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules27248942
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unsymmetrical Strategy on α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Mediated Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations

by
Xin Ma
1,2,
Yixin Zhang
1,* and
Zhongbao Jian
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Renmin Street 5625, Changchun 130022, China
2
School of Applied Chemistry and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(24), 8942; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248942
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advance in Transition Metal Complexes and Their Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Among various catalyst design strategies used in the α-diimine nickel(II) and palladium(II) catalyst systems, the unsymmetrical strategy is an effective and widely utilized method. In this contribution, unsymmetrical nickel and palladium α-diimine catalysts (Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd) derived from the dibenzobarrelene backbone were constructed via the combination of pentiptycenyl and diisopropylphenyl substituents, and investigated toward ethylene (co)polymerization. Both of these catalysts were capable of polymerizing ethylene in a broad temperature range of 0–120 °C, in which Ipty/iPr-Ni could maintain activity in the level of 106 g mol−1 h−1 even at 120 °C. The branching densities of polyethylenes generated by both nickel and palladium catalysts could be modulated by the reaction temperature. Compared with symmetrical Ipty-Ni and iPr-Ni, Ipty/iPr-Ni exhibited the highest activity, the highest polymer molecular weight, and the lowest branching density. In addition, Ipty/iPr-Pd could produce copolymers of ethylene and methyl acrylate, with the polar monomer incorporating both on the main chain and the terminal of branches. Remarkably, the ratio of the in-chain and end-chain polar monomer incorporations could be modulated by varying the temperature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the past twenty years, late transition metal catalysed olefin polymerization has entered high-speed development, since the benchmark discovery of α-diimine catalysts [1,2,3]. The type of α-diimine catalysts serves as an important component in the late transition metal catalyst field, because of its unique chain walking polymerization pathway that could result in diverse chain structures of polyolefins. The structure of α-diimine catalyst is one of the key factors to produce desired polymers, thus tremendous efforts have been made in designing catalysts [4,5,6,7]. The modification of α-diimine catalysts has been mainly focused on N-substituent steric bulk [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], electronic disturbance [21,22,23,24,25], backbone hindrance [26,27,28,29,30], and external stimuli [31,32,33,34].
Among various catalyst design strategies, the unsymmetrical strategy has been applied extensively. To date, this strategy mainly has three operative manners: (1) different N-aryl substituents on the two sides of the α-diimine ligand; (2) different N-substituents involving nonaromatic groups on the two sides of the α-diimine ligand; and (3) different substituents on the 2,6-positions of one N-aryl ring. In the first manner of the unsymmetrical strategy, dibenzhydryl substituents have been utilized widely as one of the N-aryl moiety, coupling with another aryl group to build the α-diimine framework (Scheme 1, I). For example, Chen and coworkers reported a series of α-diimine palladium catalysts featuring the dibenzhydryl group and systematically steric demanding aryl rings [35]. These catalysts were capable of modulating activities, polymer molecular weights and branching densities in a wide range. Sun [36,37,38], Dai [39,40,41], and our group [42] also independently developed distinctive unsymmetrical α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts based on the dibenzhydryl substituent. Besides the dibenzhydryl type, various steric encumbering N-aryl substituents have been used in the unsymmetrical systems [43,44,45,46,47]. Recently, a flexible alkyl amine was introduced into the α-diimine ligand, replacing one bulky aryl amine moiety (Scheme 1, II) [48]. The resultant unsymmetrical nickel and palladium catalysts exhibited moderate to high activities, and afforded low to high molecular weight polyethylenes with varied branching densities. On the contrast to the former two ways that construct catalysts with unsymmetrical structures, the third method of the unsymmetrical strategy generally endows the catalyst a C2 symmetrical geometry (Scheme 1, III) [49,50,51,52,53,54], among which α-diimine nickel catalysts usually demonstrated excellent ethylene polymerization performance, enabling high activities, high molecular weights, as well as high thermal stability. Moreover, these catalysts also exhibited good catalytic behaviour toward α-olefin polymerization, such as propylene and 1-hexene. Recently, with further combination of the rotation-restricted strategy, benzosuberyl substituents were adopted in the unsymmetrical strategy, forming unsymmetrical structures rather than C2 symmetrical structures (Scheme 1, IV) [55,56]. For example, “sandwich-like” geometries were found in the α-diimine nickel catalysts, which generated polyethylenes with higher molecular weights than those of their free-rotated dibenzhydryl counterparts.
Recently, our group has developed α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts derived from a bulky dibenzobarrelene backbone and bulky axial pentiptycenyl substituents (Scheme 2, Ipty-Ni and Ipty-Pd) [10,57,58,59]. These two catalysts could produce ultra-highly branched (>200/1000C) polyethylenes with exclusive methyl branches, of which the branching density generated by the palladium system could be modulated through a polar additive method. Based on these results, we attempted to apply the unsymmetrical strategy in this α-diimine system by replacing one of the pentiptycenyl substituents with the 2,6-diisopropyl-substituted phenyl group, which has been widely used in the catalyst modification [24,26,28,30,34]. Thus, in this contribution, unsymmetrical nickel (Ipty/iPr-Ni) and palladium (Ipty/iPr-Pd) α-diimine catalysts were synthesized, and further studied toward ethylene co(polymerization), which exhibited distinctive polymerization properties.

2. Results

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd

As shown in Scheme 3, the unsymmetrical α-diimine ligand Ipty/iPr-L was synthesized through a two-step procedure, in which the ketone-imine intermediate was first prepared. Treatments of Ipty/iPr-L with precursors NiBr2(DME) or PdMeCl(COD) produced the corresponding nickel dibromide complex Ipty/iPr-Ni or palladium methyl chloride Ipty/iPr-Pd in high yields, respectively. For comparison, symmetrical nickel complexes iPr-Ni [60] and Ipty-Ni [10] were also prepared according to the reported literature.
The new α-diimine ligand and the palladium complex were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis, while the nickel complex was identified by mass spectroscopy and elemental analysis. In addition, molecular structures of Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd were further confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Ipty/iPr-Ni displays a typical distorted tetrahedral geometry, in which the angle between the N−Ni−N plane and the Br−Ni−Br plane is 87.43°, smaller than that of Ipty-Ni (90.00°) [58]. Moreover, the twist angle between the pentiptycene aryl ring and the nickel diamine (N−Ni−N) plane is 78.77°, smaller than that of 84.25° in Ipty-Ni. This result suggests that the repulsive interaction between the dibenzobarrelene backbone and the pentiptycene substituent in Ipty/iPr-Ni is larger than that in Ipty-Ni, which could lead to a more crowded environment around the nickel centre. The larger buried volume Vbur (47.8%) of Ipty/iPr-Ni (Figure 3) than that (42.3%) of Ipty-Ni further verifies this anticipation. In comparison with iPr-Ni, the twist angle between the 2,6-diisopropyl phenyl ring and the N−Ni−N plane in Ipty/iPr-Ni is slightly larger (82.86° vs. 82.45°), indicative of a slightly larger steric hindrance. For the nickel complexes, the order of the buried volume is Ipty/iPr-Ni (Vbur = 47.8%) > iPr-Ni (Vbur = 45.3%) > Ipty-Ni (Vbur = 42.3%) [60]. For palladium analogues, the steric bulk also follows the order of Ipty/iPr-Pd > iPr-Pd > Ipty-Pd (Vbur = 50.8% vs. 49.4% vs. 44.6%). In addition, it is obvious that in the solid-state structures of both Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd, the rigid dibenzobarrelene backbone provides an effective shield on the back side of the metal centre, which could retard the associative chain transfer or chain transfer to monomer [28].

2.2. Ethylene Polymerizaiton by Ipty/iPr-Ni

The catalytic properties of Ipty/iPr-Ni were first investigated toward the effect of cocatalysts, wherein three aluminium activators (MMAO, MAO, and AlEt2Cl) were selected to carry out ethylene polymerization at 50 °C (Table 1). Among these three aluminium agents, the activation of MMAO endowed Ipty/iPr-Ni the highest activity of 6.96 × 106 g mol−1 h−1, along with a high molecular weight that was only slightly lower than the highest value achieved by MAO (1417 kDa vs. 1503 kDa). Moreover, the effect of MMAO and MAO on the branching density was negligible. Compared to MMAO and MAO, Et2AlCl had a preference for obtaining higher branching number (86/1000C), yet the polymer molecular weight sharply dropped (Table 1, entries 3 vs. 1, 2).
Taking the activity and the molecular weight into consideration, MMAO was selected as the activator in further studies of Ipty/iPr-Ni catalytic performance toward ethylene polymerization (Table 2). In a broad temperature range of 0–120 °C, Ipty/iPr-Ni displayed excellent ethylene polymerization activities in the level of 106–107 g mol−1 h−1 (Table 2, entries 1–6). With the temperature increasing, the activity ascended first, reaching the highest value of 1.43 × 107 g mol−1 h−1 at 30 °C that is comparable to that of classical metallocene catalysts, and then descended. We assume that the initiation of Ipty/iPr-Ni is incomplete at the low temperature of 0 °C, while the catalyst deactivation is attributed to the decrease in activities at higher temperatures. Note that although the activity dropped at 120 °C, it remained in the level of 106 g mol−1 h−1 (Table 2, entry 6). In terms of the polymer molecular weight, a descending tendency was observed with the temperature increasing. This could be ascribed to the acceleration of chain transfer associated with β-H elimination, which was the outcome of the decreasing axial steric hindrance caused by the faster rotation of the N-aryl rings at elevated temperature. Furthermore, the increased β-H elimination by chain transfer could also enhance the probability of chain walking, leading to the increase in the branching density. As a result, the variation of polyethylene microstructures from a lightly branched (16/1000C) semi-crystalline structure (Tm = 111.9 °C) to a highly branched (105/1000C) amorphous structure was able to be modulated by changing the reaction temperature.
To study the polymerization medium influence on the catalytic and polymer properties, hexane was used under the condition of 50 °C. Compared to those in toluene, the activity and the polymer molecular weight in hexane were enhanced by about 1.63 and 1.43 times, respectively, while the branching density decreased (Table 1, entries 7 vs. 3). It is assumed that the metal cation and the cocatalyst anion interaction is weakened in the hexane [61], rendering the nickel centre more electrophilic [62]. In consequence, ethylene coordination and insertion as the rate-limiting step in α-diimine nickel mediated ethylene polymerization is facilitated to achieve a higher activity. Moreover, the relatively fast ethylene coordination and insertion relative to chain transfer and chain walking could also be responsible for the increase in the molecular weight and the decrease in the branching density.
Parallel ethylene polymerization experiments of symmetrical iPr-Ni and Ipty-Ni at 30 °C were performed (Table 1, entries 8, 9 vs. 2). Under otherwise identical conditions, unsymmetrical Ipty/iPr-Ni exhibited the highest activity and polymer molecular weight (Figure 4). Generally, the increase in the steric hindrance around the metal centre is in disadvantage of ethylene coordination, as well as β-H elimination. The former will result in the decrease in the activity, while the latter can improve the polymer molecular weight and lower the branching density. However, as for these three nickel catalysts, the tendency on activity was Ipty/iPr-Ni > iPr-Ni > Ipty-Ni, in line with the steric bulk order of Ipty/iPr-Ni > iPr-Ni > Ipty-Ni, which did not fit the general rule. In view of the polymer molecular weight, the trend followed the order of Ipty/iPr-Ni > iPr-Ni > Ipty-Ni, in agreement with the increasing steric hindrance tendency. Note that the molecular weight of polyethylenes obtained by Ipty/iPr-Ni was dramatically higher than those of iPr-Ni and Ipty-Ni. Furthermore, the branching density showed an upward trend (Ipty/iPr-Ni < iPr-Ni < Ipty-Ni), consistent with the decrease in chain walking associated with the reduced β-H elimination.

2.3. Copolymerizaiton of Ethylene and Polar Monomer by Ipty/iPr-Ni

Ipty/iPr-Ni was further investigated toward the ethylene copolymerization with the bio-renewable monomer methyl 10-undecenoate (UA) [63] in the activation of MMAO. In the presence of 0.05 M of UA, Ipty/iPr-Ni showed a high copolymerization activity of 6.3 × 105 g mol−1 h−1, accompanied with a high molecular weight (443 kDa) and the incorporation ratio of 0.12 mol% (Table 3, entry 1). When the concentration of UA was increased to 0.1 M, the comonomer incorporation was marginally improved to 0.18 mol%, while the activity and the copolymer molecular weight slightly decreased (Table 3, entry 2). To further improve the comonomer incorporation, ethylene pressure was reduced from 8 bar to 6 bar to 2 bar (Table 3, entries 3 and 4). At the low ethylene pressure of 2 bar, the comonomer incorporation reached 0.41 mol%, yet the activity and the copolymer molecular weight sharply dropped, as anticipated.

2.4. Mechanical Properties of (Co)Polymers Generatedr by Ipty/iPr-Ni

Three polyethylene samples with different branching densities were selected for tensile tests to investigate the mechanical properties (Figure 5a). Stress at break values of the three selected polyethylenes followed an opposite tendency (5.9 MPa > 4.5 MPa > 2.3 MPa) to the variation of the branching density (71/1000C < 81/1000C < 94/1000C). Strain at break values were observed in the range of 239% to 266%. For comparison, one copolymer sample with lower branching density was chosen for the mechanical study. Values of stress at break and strain at break were improved dramatically to 9.1 MPa and 470%, respectively. Moreover, the strain recovery of the selected copolymer showed a value of 51%, indicating the feature of elastomer (Figure 5b).

2.5. Ethylene Polymerizaiton by Ipty/iPr-Pd

In the presence of sodium tetrakis(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)borate (NaBArF), Ipty/iPr-Pd could also catalyse ethylene polymerization in the broad temperature range of 0–120 °C (Table 4). Compared to the nickel analogue, the activity and the molecular weight exhibited similar trends with the temperature increasing, of which the activity rose first, and then fell, while the polymer molecular weight decreased. On the contrast, the branching density displayed a decreasing tend along with the elevated temperature. This phenomenon was in agreement with our previous reported Ipty-Pd [10], yet inconsistent with the general fact that the branching density in the α-diimine palladium systems is independent with the reaction temperature [64]. According to the previous report by Brookhart, one plausible explanation is that the activation entropy of ethylene insertion into a secondary Pd-alkyl bond is much more negative than that into a primary Pd-alkyl bond [65]. More importantly, highly branched (124–164/1000C) structures of polyethylenes were found, which is rare in the α-diimine palladium catalysts. The relationship of the branching density and ethylene pressure was studied by lowering ethylene pressure (Table 4, entries 7 and 8). Under otherwise identical conditions, the branching density remained almost constant with the variation of ethylene pressure (147–150/1000C).

2.6. Copolymerizaiton of Ethylene and Polar Monomer by Ipty/iPr-Pd

The catalytic properties of Ipty/iPr-Pd toward the copolymerization of ethylene and methyl acrylate (MA) were investigated at various temperatures and comonomer concentrations (Table 5). By employing 1.0 M MA and the radical inhibitor galvinoxyl, the activity went up first, and then fell with the increase in temperature from 30 °C to 90 °C, as well as the copolymer molecular weight (Table 5, entries 1–4). The MA incorporation increased with the elevated temperature, reaching the highest value of 1.98 mol% at 90 °C, while the branching density showed a descending tend, similar to the situation in ethylene polymerization. Under otherwise identical conditions, the variation of comonomer concentration from 0.5 M to 1.0 M to 2.0 M resulted in the increase in MA incorporation (up to 2.21 mol%), yet at the cost of the activity and the copolymer molecular weight, as anticipated (Table 5, entries 3, 5 vs. 6). Moreover, highly branched architectures were formed in the Ipty/iPr-Pd-catalysed copolymerization of ethylene and MA.
Typically, the acrylate groups at the terminal of branches (TMA) dominate in the structures of copolymers generated by α-diimine palladium catalysts because of chain walking. Ipty-Pd [10] and two other palladium catalysts [15,27] have been reported as rare examples that produced highly branched copolymers featuring very high ratio of acrylate groups on the main chain (MMA), which is ascribed to the 1,2-insertion of MA. Compared to Ipty-Pd, the highly branched copolymers afforded by Ipty/iPr-Pd also preferred in-chain acrylate units. As shown in Figure 6, 13C NMR spectroscopy revealed characteristic signals for MMA units (177.24 ppm and 51.42 ppm), and TMA units (174.45 ppm and 51.57 ppm) [15,27]. Note that the ratio of MMA and TMA generated by Ipty/iPr-Pd could be modulated by varying the reaction temperature (Table 5, entries 1–4), in contrast with the slight change in the ratio in the Ipty-Pd system. At low temperature of 30 °C, the in-chain incorporation of MA was overwhelming favoured over the end-chain incorporation, with a ratio of 92:8 (Table 5, entry 1). With the temperature increasing, the proportion of the in-chain acrylate incorporation gradually dropped, reaching a similar value to that of the end-chain incorporation at 90 °C (53:47). We speculated that the replacement of one pentiptycenyl substituent with an isopropyl-substituted phenyl group changed the rigid environment of the palladium catalyst, eventually reducing the selectivity of 1,2-insertion. In addition, the comonomer concentration exerted a negligible influence on the comonomer insertion pathway (Table 5, entries 5, 6 vs. 3).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All syntheses involving air- and moisture sensitive compounds were carried out using standard Schlenk-type glassware (or in a glove box) under an atmosphere of nitrogen. All solvents were purified from the MBraun SPS system. NMR spectra for the ligand, complexes, and polymers were recorded on a Bruker AV400 (1H: 400 MHz, 13C: 100 MHz, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) or a Bruker AV500 (1H: 500 MHz, 13C: 125 MHz). The molecular weights (Mn and Mw) and molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn) of polyethylenes and copolymers were measured by means of gel permeation chromatography (GPC) on a PL-GPC 220-type high-temperature chromatograph equipped with three PL-gel 10 μm Mixed-B LS type columns at 150 °C. Melting points (Tm) of polyethylenes and copolymers were measured through DSC analyses, which were carried out on a Mettler TOPEM TM DSC Instruments (Mettler, Zurich, Switzerland) under nitrogen atmosphere at heating and cooling rates of 10 °C/min (temperature range: 20–160 °C). Mass spectra of the nickel complex was recorded on an Acquity UPLC & Quattro Premier. Elemental analyses were performed at the National Analytical Research Centre of Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry. Elemental analysis was performed at the National Analytical Research Centre of Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry. Stress/strain experiments were performed at 5 mm/min by means of an Electromechanical Universal Testing Machine (E43.104) at room temperature. Polymers were melt-pressed at 150 °C to obtain the test specimens, which have 41-mm gauge length, 17-mm width, and thickness of 1.5 mm. At least three specimens of each polymer were tested.
Materials: 9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-dione [66] and pentiptycene aminophenol [67] were prepared using the literature procedures. All other reagents were commercially available from Energy Chemical or Shanghai Titan Scientific Co, Ltd, and used as received.

3.2. Synthesis of Ligands and Catalysts

3.2.1. Synthesis of Pentiptycene Aminoanisole

To a solution of pentiptycene aminophenol (3 g, 6.5 mmol) in 100 mL dry DMF at room temperature was added NaH (468 mg, 19.5 mmol) under nitrogen. After the bubbling ceased, CH3I (0.6 mL, 9.75 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 24 h. The reaction was quenched by adding 400 mL of distilled water, and then the aqueous layer was extracted with 3 × 50 mL of CH2Cl2. The combined organic phase was washed with 3 × 50 mL of distilled water and 50 mL of brine, and then was separated and dried with sodium sulphate. After evaporation of the solvent, the pure product was obtained as a white solid (2.6 g, 84.1% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, 7.26 ppm): δ = 7.27–7.36 (m, 8H, aryl-H), 6.98–6.88 (m, 8H, aryl-H), 5.67 (s, 2H, CHPh2), 5.39 (s, 2H, CHPh2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3).

3.2.2. Synthesis of Ligand Ipty/iPr-L

A solution of pentiptycene aminoanisole (1.12 g, 2.35 mmol), 9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-dione (0.5 g, 2.13 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (20 mg) in toluene (200 mL) was stirred at 120 °C for 24 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and purified by column chromatography (hexane/CH2Cl2, 1:1) to afford the ketone-imine compound as an orange solid (0.9 g, 61% yield), which was used in next step without any further purification.
A solution of the ketone-imine compound (0.8 g, 1.15 mmol), 2,6-diisopropylaniline (0.336 g, 1.9 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (20 mg) in toluene (80 mL) was refluxed for 24 h, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and purified by column chromatography (hexane/CH2Cl2, 1:1) to afford the targeted ligand as an orange solid (0.65g, 70% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, 7.26 ppm): δ = 7.42 (d, 2H, aryl-H), 7.36–7.17 (m, 11H, aryl-H), 7.06–6.96 (m, 6H, aryl-H), 6.85–6.75 (m, 8H, aryl-H), 5.78 (s, 2H, CH), 5.13 (s, 1H, CH), 4.91 (s, 2H, CH), 4.78 (s, 1H, CH), 4.03 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.81 (m, 2H, CH), 1.34 (dd, 6H, CHCH3), 1.29 (dd, 6H, CHCH3). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, 77.16 ppm): δ = 161.75, 159.40 (N=C-Me), 147.12, 145.98, 145.76, 145.62, 145.54, 144.56, 139.25, 138.52, 137.56, 136.41, 135.89, 132.14, 127.62, 127.18, 125.64, 125.42, 125.31, 124.92, 124.85, 124.57, 124.33, 123.51, 123.23, 63.19 (OCH3), 51.73, 51.48, 49.46, 48.38, 28.78, 27.06, 23.68, 22.86. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd for C63H50N2O: C, 88.91; H, 5.92; N, 3.29. Found: C, 88.82; H, 5.83; N, 3.32.

3.2.3. Synthesis of the Nickel Catalyst Ipty/iPr-Ni

A mixture of Ipty/iPr-L (200.0 mg, 0.23 mmol) and (DME)NiBr2 (72.5 mg, 0.23 mmol) (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) were stirred in 50 mL of dichloromethane for 1 day at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the desired compound can be isolated from repeated recrystallized from n-hexane and dichloromethane. The pure compound was obtained as a dark-yellow solid (180 mg, 73% yield). MALDI-TOF-MS (m/z): 851.8 [M-Ni-2Br]+. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd for C63H50Br2N2NiO: C, 70.74; H, 4.71; N, 2.62. Found: C, 70.56; H, 4.80; N, 2.56.

3.2.4. Synthesis of the Nickel Catalyst Ipty/iPr-Pd

To a solution of Ipty/iPr-L (250 mg, 0.294 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (25 mL) was added 81.8 mg (0.308 mmol) of PdMeCl(COD). After stirring the mixture for 2 days at room temperature, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The desired compound can be isolated from repeated recrystallized from n-hexane and dichloromethane, and was obtained as an orange solid (220 mg, 74.2% yield). 1H NMR (500 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, 7.26 ppm): δ = 7.46–7.41 (m, 6H, aryl-H), 7.35–7.20 (m, 9H, aryl-H), 7.07 (t, 2H, aryl-H), 6.98 (t, 2H, aryl-H), 6.84 (m, 4H, aryl-H), 6.76–6.71 (m, 4H, aryl-H), 5.80 (s, 2H, CH), 5.18 (s, 2H, CH), 5.09 (s, 1H, CH), 4.74 (s, 1H, CH), 4.05 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.15 (m, 2H, CH), 1.63 (d, 6H, CH3), 1.33 (d, 6H, CH3), -0.20 (s, 3H, Pd-CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, 77.16 ppm): δ = 174.11 (N=C-Me), 167.60 (N=C-Me), 149.26, 145.30, 144.98, 144.89, 143.50, 140.43, 139.25, 138.28, 137.20, 136.75, 135.90, 132.53, 128.66, 127.69, 125.89, 125.86, 125.76, 125.67, 125.42, 124.97, 124.89, 123.77, 123.60, 123.30, 63.13 (OCH3), 51.38, 50.62, 49.56, 48.39, 31.74, 31.20 29.30, 27.81 24.52, 23.60, 22.80, 14.26, 4.04 (Pd-CH3). Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd for C64H53ClN2OPd: C, 76.26; H, 5.30; N, 2.78. Found: C, 76.37; H, 5.25; N, 2.84.

3.3. X-ray Diffraction

All data collections were performed at 293 K on a Bruker SMART APEX diffractometer with a CCD area detector, using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) or Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). The determination of crystal class and unit cell parameters was carried out by the SMART program package [68]. The raw frame data were processed using SAINT and SADABS to yield the reflection data file [69]. All structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 using SHELXTL or Olex2 [70,71]. Refinement was performed on F2 anisotropically for all non-hydrogen atoms by the full-matrix least-squares method. The hydrogen atoms were placed at the calculated positions and were included in the structure calculation without further refinement of the parameters. Exceptions and special features: For Ipty/iPr-Ni, the BASF/TWIN refinement was performed to obtain the reasonable Flack x. The program SQUEEZE [72] was used to remove mathematically the effect of the solvent. The quoted formula and derived parameters are not included the squeezed solvent molecules. For Ipty/iPr-Pd, the BASF/TWIN refinement was performed to obtain the reasonable Flack x. The program SQUEEZE [72] was used to remove mathematically the effect of the solvent. The quoted formula and derived parameters are not included the squeezed solvent molecules.

3.4. General Procedures for the Polymerizations

3.4.1. A General Procedure for Ethylene Polymerization

In a typical experiment, a 350 mL glass pressure reactor connected with a high-pressure gas line was firstly dried at 90 °C under vacuum for at least 1 h. The reactor was then adjusted to the desired polymerization temperature. 98 mL of toluene and the cocatalyst were added to the reactor under N2 atmosphere, and then the desired amount of the catalyst in 2 mL of CH2Cl2 was injected into the polymerization system via syringe. With a rapid stirring, the reactor was pressurized and maintained at the desired ethylene pressure. After the desired reaction time, the pressure reactor was vented, and the polymerization was quenched via the addition of 100 mL EtOH (for the nickel system: acidic EtOH containing 5% HCl), filtered and dried in a vacuum oven to the constant weight.

3.4.2. A General Procedure for the Copolymerization of Ethylene with Polar Monomer

In a typical experiment, a 150 mL glass pressure reactor connected with a high-pressure gas line was firstly dried at 90 °C under vacuum for at least 1 h. The reactor was then adjusted to the desired polymerization temperature. 20 mL of toluene with the cocatalyst and polar monomer was added to the reactor under N2 atmosphere, then the desired amount of the catalyst in 2 mL of CH2Cl2 was injected into the polymerization system via syringe subsequently. With a rapid stirring, the reactor was pressurized and maintained at desired ethylene pressure. After the desired reaction time, the pressure reactor was vented, and the polymerization was quenched via the addition of 20 mL EtOH (for the nickel system: acidic EtOH containing 5% HCl), filtered and dried in a vacuum oven to the constant weight.

4. Conclusions

With the combination of the pentiptycenyl and diisopropylphenyl substituents, the unsymmetrical α-diimine nickel and palladium complexes (Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd) were constructed. In the activation of MMAO, Ipty/iPr-Ni exhibited excellent activities toward ethylene polymerization in a broad temperature range of 0–120 °C. Remarkably, the activity in the level of 106 g mol−1 h−1 was accessible even at high temperature of 120 °C. High molecular weight polyethylenes with variable branching density were accessible by varying the reaction temperature. Therefore, polyethylenes could convert from the lightly branched semi-crystalline structure to the highly branched amorphous structure. Compared to symmetrical Ipty-Ni and iPr-Ni, unsymmetrical Ipty/iPr-Ni displayed much higher ethylene polymerization activity and molecular weight of polyethylenes, yet with the lowest branching density. Moreover, Ipty/iPr-Ni could copolymerize ethylene and methyl 10-undecenoate. As for Ipty/iPr-Pd, the broad temperature range of 0–120 °C was also applicable for ethylene polymerization. Polyethylenes with ultrahigh branching densities were obtained, and more importantly, the branching density could be modulated through changing the reaction temperature. In the copolymerization of ethylene and methyl acrylate, highly branched copolymers were afforded, with the acrylate units locating on both the main chain and the terminal of branches. In-chain acrylate incorporation dominated at low temperature of 30 °C, and the ratio of in-chain and end-chain incorporations could be modulated by the reaction temperature. This work shows an unsymmetrical strategy as an effective tool for modulating olefin polymerization.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27248942/s1, Figures S1–S5: Characterization of the ligand and complexes; Figures S6–S44: NMR figures of (co)polymers; Figures S45–S67: GPC figures of (co)polymers; Figures S68–S79: DSC figures of (co)polymers; Table S1: Crystallographic data for Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.M. and Z.J.; investigation, X.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.J.; supervision, Z.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22122110 and 22001244) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd are available from the authors.

References

  1. Mecking, S.; Johnson, L.K.; Wang, L.; Brookhart, M. Mechanistic Studies of the Palladium-Catalyzed Copolymerization of Ethylene and α-Olefins with Methyl Acrylate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnson, L.K.; Mecking, S.; Brookhart, M. Copolymerization of Ethylene and Propylene with Functionalized Vinyl Monomers by Palladium(II) Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 267–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Johnson, L.K.; Killian, C.M.; Brookhart, M. New Pd(II)- and Ni(II)-Based Catalysts for Polymerization of Ethylene and α-Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6414–6415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, R.; Wu, W.K.; Stieglitz, L.; Gaan, S.; Rieger, B.; Heuberger, M. Recent Advances on α-Diimine Ni and Pd Complexes for Catalyzed Ethylene (Co)Polymerization: A Comprehensive Review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 474, 214844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Jian, Z. Advances on Controlled Chain Walking and Suppression of Chain Transfer in Catalytic Olefin Polymerization. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 14304–14320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Z.; Brookhart, M. Exploring Ethylene/Polar Vinyl Monomer Copolymerizations Using Ni and Pd α-Diimine Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, L.; Dai, S.; Sui, X.; Chen, C. Palladium and Nickel Catalyzed Chain Walking Olefin Polymerization and Copolymerization. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hu, X.; Kang, X.; Jian, Z. Suppression of Chain Transfer at High Temperature in Catalytic Olefin Polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, X.; Kang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jian, Z. Facile Access to Polar Functionalized Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene at Ambient Conditions. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 1680–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Mecking, S.; Jian, Z. Ultrahigh Branching of Main-Chain-Functionalized Polyethylenes by Inverted Insertion Selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 14296–14302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xia, J.; Zhang, Y.; Kou, S.; Jian, Z. A Concerted Double-Layer Steric Strategy Enables an Ultra-Highly Active Nickel Catalyst to Access Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylenes. J. Catal. 2020, 390, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, L.; Sun, W.; Li, S.; Xu, G.; Dai, S. Bulky yet Flexible Substituents in Insertion Polymerization with α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Systems. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 4866–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, M.; Wang, X.; Luo, Y.; Chen, C. A Second-Coordination-Sphere Strategy to Modulate Nickel- and Palladium-Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization and Copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11604–11609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, S.; Chen, C. Direct Synthesis of Functionalized High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene by Copolymerization of Ethylene with Polar Monomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 13281–13285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takano, S.; Takeuchi, D.; Osakada, K.; Akamatsu, N.; Shishido, A. Dipalladium Catalyst for Olefin Polymerization: Introduction of Acrylate Units into the Main Chain of Branched Polyethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9246–9250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Allen, K.E.; Campos, J.; Daugulis, O.; Brookhart, M. Living Polymerization of Ethylene and Copolymerization of Ethylene/Methyl Acrylate Using “Sandwich” Diimine Palladium Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vaidya, T.; Klimovica, K.; LaPointe, A.M.; Keresztes, I.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Daugulis, O.; Coates, G.W. Secondary Alkene Insertion and Precision Chain-Walking: A New Route to Semicrystalline “Polyethylene” from α-Olefins by Combining Two Rare Catalytic Events. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7213–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rhinehart, J.L.; Brown, L.A.; Long, B.K. A Robust Ni(II) α-Diimine Catalyst for High Temperature Ethylene Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16316–16319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meinhard, D.; Wegner, M.; Kipiani, G.; Hearley, A.; Reuter, P.; Fischer, S.; Marti, O.; Rieger, B. New Nickel(II) Diimine Complexes and the Control of Polyethylene Microstructure by Catalyst Design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9182–9191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Camacho, D.H.; Salo, E.V.; Ziller, J.W.; Guan, Z. Cyclophane-Based Highly Active Late-Transition-Metal Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1821–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, X.; Wang, C.; Jian, Z. Comprehensive Studies of Ligand Electronic Effect on Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Nickel(II) Promoted Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 4005–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, S.; Xu, G.; Dai, S. A Remote Nonconjugated Electron Effect in Insertion Polymerization with α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Species. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 2692–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, L.; Dai, S.; Chen, C. Investigations of the Ligand Electronic Effects on α-Diimine Nickel(II) Catalyzed Ethylene Polymerization. Polymers 2016, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Popeney, C.S.; Guan, Z. Effect of Ligand Electronics on the Stability and Chain Transfer Rates of Substituted Pd(II) α-Diimine Catalysts. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 4091–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Popeney, C.; Guan, Z. Ligand Electronic Effects on Late Transition Metal Polymerization Catalysts. Organometallics 2005, 24, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhong, L.; Zheng, H.; Du, C.; Du, W.; Liao, G.; Cheung, C.S.; Gao, H. Thermally Robust α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Catalysts with Constrained Space for Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. J. Catal. 2020, 384, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dall’Anese, A.; Rosar, V.; Cusin, L.; Montini, T.; Balducci, G.; D’Auria, I.; Pellecchia, C.; Fornasiero, P.; Felluga, F.; Milani, B. Palladium-Catalyzed Ethylene/Methyl Acrylate Copolymerization: Moving from the Acenaphthene to the Phenanthrene Skeleton of α-Diimine Ligands. Organometallics 2019, 38, 3498–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhong, L.; Li, G.; Liang, G.; Gao, H.; Wu, Q. Enhancing Thermal Stability and Living Fashion in α-Diimine-Nickel-Catalyzed (Co)Polymerization of Ethylene and Polar Monomer by Increasing the Steric Bulk of Ligand Backbone. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 2675–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Long, B.K.; Eagan, J.M.; Mulzer, M.; Coates, G.W. Semi-Crystalline Polar Polyethylene: Ester-Functionalized Linear Polyolefins Enabled by a Functional-Group-Tolerant, Cationic Nickel Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7106–7110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, J.; Chen, D.; Wu, H.; Xiao, Z.; Gao, H.; Zhu, F.; Wu, Q. Polymerization of α-Olefins Using a Camphyl α-Diimine Nickel Catalyst at Elevated Temperature. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3325–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peng, D.; Chen, C. Photoresponsive Palladium and Nickel Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22195–22200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, G.; Peng, D.; Chen, C. Interplay of Supramolecular Chemistry and Photochemistry with Palladium-Catalyzed Ethylene Polymerization. CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 2025–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, M.; Chen, C. Accessing Multiple Catalytically Active States in Redox-Controlled Olefin Polymerization. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7490–7494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anderson, W.C., Jr.; Rhinehart, J.L.; Tennyson, A.G.; Long, B.K. Redox-Active Ligands: An Advanced Tool to Modulate Polyethylene Microstructure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 774–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai, S.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, W.; Chen, C. Systematic Investigations of Ligand Steric Effects on α-Diimine Palladium Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization and Copolymerization. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 8855–8862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, M.; Zhang, R.; Ma, Y.; Han, M.; Solan, G.A.; Yang, W.; Liang, T.; Sun, W.-H. Trifluoromethoxy-Substituted Nickel Catalysts for Producing Highly Branched Polyethylenes: Impact of Solvent, Activator and N,N′-Ligand on Polymer Properties. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 1040–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Solan, G.A.; Sun, Y.; Sun, W.-H. Plastomeric-Like Polyethylenes Achievable Using Thermally Robust N,N′-Nickel Catalysts Appended with Electron Withdrawing Difluorobenzhydryl and Nitro Groups. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 1878–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Du, S.; Kong, S.; Shi, Q.; Mao, J.; Guo, C.; Yi, J.; Liang, T.; Sun, W.-H. Enhancing the Activity and Thermal Stability of Nickel Complex Precatalysts Using 1-[2,6-Bis(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)-4-methyl phenylimino]-2-aryliminoacenaphthylene Derivatives. Organometallics 2015, 34, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, Z.; Chang, G.; Wang, H.; Jing, K.; Dai, S. A Dual Steric Enhancement Strategy in α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Catalysts for Ethylene Polymerization and Copolymerization. Organometallics 2022, 41, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hai, Z.; Lu, Z.; Li, S.; Cao, Z.-Y.; Dai, S. The Synergistic Effect of Rigid and Flexible Substituents on Insertion Polymerization with α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Catalysts. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 4643–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, L.; Liu, W.; Li, K.; Sun, M.; Sun, W.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, G.; Peng, H.; Liu, Z.; Dai, S. Synthesis of Functional and Hyperbranched Ethylene Oligomers Using Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Palladium Catalysts. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 115, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jian, Z. Unsymmetrical Strategy Makes Significant Differences in α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Catalyzed Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 2497–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, Z.; Liao, Y.; Fan, W.; Dai, S. Efficient Suppression of the Chain Transfer Reaction in Ethylene Coordination Polymerization with Dibenzosuberyl Substituents. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 4090–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, W.; Liao, Y.; Dai, S. Facile Access to Ultra-Highly Branched Polyethylenes Using Hybrid “Sandwich” Ni(II) and Pd(II) Catalysts. J. Catal. 2022, 411, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, X.; Dong, B.; Yang, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X. α-Diimine Nickel Complexes Bearing Axially Bulky Terphenyl and Equatorially Bulky Dibenzobarrelene Groups: Synthesis, Characterization and Olefin Polymerization Studies. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 6783–6793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rosar, V.; Montini, T.; Balducci, G.; Zangrando, E.; Fornasiero, P.; Milani, B. Palladium-Catalyzed Ethylene/Methyl Acrylate Co-Oligomerization: The Effect of a New Nonsymmetrical α-Diimine with the 1,4-Diazabutadiene Skeleton. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 3402–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yuan, S.; Yue, E.; Wen, C.; Sun, W.-H. Synthesis, Characterization, and Ethylene Polymerization of 1-[2,4-Bis(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)naphthylimino]-2-aryliminoacenaphthylnickel Bromides: Influences of Polymerization Parameters on Polyethylenes. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 7431–7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, S.; Dai, S. 8-Arylnaphthyl Substituent Retarding Chain Transfer in Insertion Polymerization with Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Systems. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 7199–7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xia, J.; Kou, S.; Mu, H.; Jian, Z. Slow-Chain-Walking Polymerization of Ethylene and Highly Chain-Straightening Polymerization of 1-Hexene to Access Semicrystalline Polyolefins. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 166, 111022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, B.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Tang, T.; Zhang, X. Propylene Homopolymerization and Copolymerization with Ethylene by Acenaphthene-Based α-Diimine Nickel Complexes to Access EPR-Like Elastomers. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 6307–6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, X.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, H.; Cui, L.; Jian, Z. Preparation and in situ Chain-End-Functionalization of Branched Ethylene Oligomers by Monosubstituted α-Diimine Nickel Catalysts. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 2596–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fang, J.; Sui, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, C. Synthesis of Polyolefin Elastomers from Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Nickel Catalyzed Olefin Polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 4143–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sui, X.; Hong, C.; Pang, W.; Chen, C. Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Palladium Catalysts and Their Properties in Olefin (Co)Polymerization. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cherian, A.E.; Rose, J.M.; Lobkovsky, E.B.; Coates, G.W. A C2-Symmetric, Living α-Diimine Ni(II) Catalyst: Regioblock Copolymers from Propylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13770–13771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dai, S.; Li, G.; Lu, W.; Liao, Y.; Fan, W. Suppression of Chain Transfer via a Restricted Rotation Effect of Dibenzosuberyl Substituents in Polymerization Catalysis. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 3240–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.-Y.; Wang, C.-Q.; Hu, X.-Q.; Xia, Y.; Chi, Y.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Jian, Z.-B. Benzosuberyl Substituents as a “Sandwich-Like” Function in Olefin Polymerization Catalysis. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 39, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Jian, Z. Polar Additive Triggered Chain Walking Copolymerization of Ethylene and Fundamental Polar Monomers. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 4966–4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Kang, X.; Jian, Z. Selective Branch Formation in Ethylene Polymerization to Access Precise Ethylene-Propylene Copolymers. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Jian, Z. Polar Additive Triggered Branching Switch and Block Polyolefin Topology in Living Ethylene Polymerization. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 3191–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huo, P.; Liu, W.; He, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y. Nickel (II) Complexes with Three-Dimensional Geometry α-Diimine Ligands: Synthesis and Catalytic Activity toward Copolymerization of Norbornene. Organometallics 2013, 32, 2291–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Pickens, D.B.; Motta, A.; Wang, Q.J.; Chung, Y.-W.; Lohr, T.L.; Marks, T.J. Highly Branched Polyethylene Oligomers via Group IV-Catalysed Polymerization in very Nonpolar Media. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Johnson, L.; Wang, L.; McLain, S.; Bennett, A.; Dobbs, K.; Hauptman, E.; Ionkin, A.; Ittel, S.; Kunitsky, K.; Marshall, W.; et al. Copolymerization of Ethylene and Acrylates by Nickel Catalysts, Beyond Metallocenes; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lebarbé, T.; Maisonneuve, L.; Nga Nguyen, T.H.; Gadenne, B.; Alfos, C.; Cramail, H. Methyl 10-Undecenoate as a Raw Material for the Synthesis of Renewable Semi-Crystalline Polyesters and Poly(Ester-Amide)s. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 2842–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhong, S.; Tan, Y.; Zhong, L.; Gao, J.; Liao, H.; Jiang, L.; Gao, H.; Wu, Q. Precision Synthesis of Ethylene and Polar Monomer Copolymers by Palladium-Catalyzed Living Coordination Copolymerization. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5661–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bézier, D.; Daugulis, O.; Brookhart, M. Oligomerization of Ethylene Using a Diphosphine Palladium Catalyst. Organometallics 2017, 36, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mondal, R.; Shah, B.K.; Neckers, D.C. Photogeneration of Heptacene in a Polymer Matrix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9612–9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, L.; Mu, H.; Jian, Z. Pentiptycenyl Substituents in Insertion Polymerization with α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Species. Organometallics 2019, 38, 2075–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. SMART, Version 5.054; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2000.
  69. SAINT and SADABS, Version 6.22; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2000.
  70. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal Structure Refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  71. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Spek, A.L. PLATON SQUEEZE: A Tool for the Calculation of the Disordered Solvent Contribution to the Calculated Structure Factors. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 08942 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Selected examples of the unsymmetrical strategy on α-diimine nickel and palladium systems (M = Ni or Pd).
Scheme 1. Selected examples of the unsymmetrical strategy on α-diimine nickel and palladium systems (M = Ni or Pd).
Molecules 27 08942 sch001
Molecules 27 08942 sch002 550
Scheme 2. The unsymmetrical strategy on the α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts in this contribution.
Scheme 2. The unsymmetrical strategy on the α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts in this contribution.
Molecules 27 08942 sch002
Molecules 27 08942 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Ipty/iPr-Ni and Ipty/iPr-Pd.
Molecules 27 08942 sch003
Molecules 27 08942 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structure of Ipty/iPr-Ni drawn with 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å): Ni1–Br1 2.360(2), Ni1–Br2 2.273(3), Ni1–N1 2.027(8), Ni1–N2 2.034(9).
Figure 1. Molecular structure of Ipty/iPr-Ni drawn with 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å): Ni1–Br1 2.360(2), Ni1–Br2 2.273(3), Ni1–N1 2.027(8), Ni1–N2 2.034(9).
Molecules 27 08942 g001
Molecules 27 08942 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular structure of Ipty/iPr-Pd drawn with 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms and one CH2Cl2 molecule are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å): Pd1–Cl1 2.280(2), Pd1–C80 2.084(5), Pd1–N1 2.063(4), Pd1–N2 2.151(5).
Figure 2. Molecular structure of Ipty/iPr-Pd drawn with 30% probability ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms and one CH2Cl2 molecule are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å): Pd1–Cl1 2.280(2), Pd1–C80 2.084(5), Pd1–N1 2.063(4), Pd1–N2 2.151(5).
Molecules 27 08942 g002
Molecules 27 08942 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Steric maps of Ipty/iPr-Ni (Vbur = 47.8%) based on the solid-state structure. (b) Steric maps of Ipty/iPr-Pd (Vbur = 50.8%) based on the solid-state structure.
Figure 3. (a) Steric maps of Ipty/iPr-Ni (Vbur = 47.8%) based on the solid-state structure. (b) Steric maps of Ipty/iPr-Pd (Vbur = 50.8%) based on the solid-state structure.
Molecules 27 08942 g003
Molecules 27 08942 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparisons of the yield, molecular weight, and branching density of polyethylenes generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni, iPr-Ni and Ipty-Ni with the activation of MMAO at 30 °C.
Figure 4. Comparisons of the yield, molecular weight, and branching density of polyethylenes generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni, iPr-Ni and Ipty-Ni with the activation of MMAO at 30 °C.
Molecules 27 08942 g004
Molecules 27 08942 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Stress–strain curves for selected (co)polymer samples generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni. (b) Plots of hysteresis experiments of ten cycles at a strain of 300% for the copolymer sample generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni.
Figure 5. (a) Stress–strain curves for selected (co)polymer samples generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni. (b) Plots of hysteresis experiments of ten cycles at a strain of 300% for the copolymer sample generated by Ipty/iPr-Ni.
Molecules 27 08942 g005
Molecules 27 08942 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of C=O and OMe resonances (45–60 ppm and 165–185 ppm) of MMA and TMA at different reaction temperatures (30, 50, 70, and 90 °C; Table 5, entries 1–4) in the 13C NMR spectra (500 MHz, 293 K, CDCl3) of ethylene-MA copolymers.
Figure 6. Comparison of C=O and OMe resonances (45–60 ppm and 165–185 ppm) of MMA and TMA at different reaction temperatures (30, 50, 70, and 90 °C; Table 5, entries 1–4) in the 13C NMR spectra (500 MHz, 293 K, CDCl3) of ethylene-MA copolymers.
Molecules 27 08942 g006
Table
Table 1. Effect of cocatalysts on ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
Table 1. Effect of cocatalysts on ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
EntryCo-Cat.Yield (g)Act. (106) bMn (104) cMw (104) cMw/Mn cBrs dTm (°C) e
1MMAO2.326.9681.2141.71.76554.6
2MAO1.624.8692.0150.31.66460.2
3Et2AlCl1.875.6148.188.31.88635.3
a Reaction conditions: Ni catalyst (1.0 μmol), cocatalyst (500 equiv.), toluene/CH2Cl2 (98 mL/2 mL), ethylene (8 bar), 50 °C, 20 min, 750 rpm, at least two runs, unless noted otherwise. b Activity is in unit of g mol−1 h−1. c Determined by GPC in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 150 °C using a light scattering detector. d Number of branches per 1000C, as determined by 1H NMR (see supplementary materials) in C2D2Cl4 at 110 °C. e Determined by DSC (second heating).
Table
Table 2. Ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
Table 2. Ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
EntryT (°C)Yield (g)Act. (106) bMn (104) cMw (104) cMw/Mn cBrs dTm (°C) e
102.3213.92166.3231.41.416111.9
2302.3814.28111.3183.61.64978.0
3501.9611.7665.6120.31.87158.0
4701.8711.2240.474.01.88145.9
5901.187.0836.869.61.994-
6 f1200.571.3710.420.62.0105-
7 g503.2019.2096.2173.11.86271.7
8 h300.734.3833.558.01.75739.3
9 i300.281.6829.848.01.6102118.7
a Reaction conditions: Ni catalyst (1.0 μmol), MMAO (500 equiv.), toluene/CH2Cl2 (98 mL/2 mL), ethylene (8 bar), 10 min, 750 rpm, at least two runs, unless noted otherwise. b Activity is in unit of g mol−1 h−1. c Determined by GPC in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 150 °C using a light scattering detector. d Number of branches per 1000C, as determined by 1H NMR in C2D2Cl4 at 110 °C. e Determined by DSC (second heating). f 25 min. g hexane. h iPr-Ni. i Ipty-Ni.
Table
Table 3. Copolymerization of ethylene and UA catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
Table 3. Copolymerization of ethylene and UA catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Ni a.
Entryp (bar)Yield (g)Act. (106) bX (mol%) cMn (104) dMw (104) dMw/Mn dBrs cTm (°C) e
1 f81.570.630.1225.744.31.785-
281.550.620.1822.040.41.86855.2
361.160.460.2122.240.21.87154.2
420.190.080.417.615.02.081-
a Reaction conditions: Ni catalyst (5.0 μmol), MMAO (500 equiv.), UA (0.1 mol/L), toluene/CH2Cl2 (23 mL/2 mL), 50 °C, 30 min, 750 rpm, at least two runs, unless noted otherwise. b Activity is in unit of g mol−1 h−1. c X = Incorporation of polar monomer, Brs = Number of branches per 1000C, as determined by 1H NMR in C2D2Cl4 at 110 °C. d Determined by GPC in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 150 °C using a light scattering detector. e Determined by DSC (second heating). f UA (0.05 mol/L).
Table
Table 4. Ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Pd a.
Table 4. Ethylene polymerization catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Pd a.
EntryT (°C)P (bar)Yield (g)Act. (106) bMn (104) cMw (104) cMw/Mn cBrs d
1 e081.380.0610.515.51.5164
23080.550.379.715.21.6156
35081.861.247.116.22.3147
47081.150.773.77.72.1139
59080.280.192.24.62.1133
612080.100.071.12.22.0124
75041.631.088.016.42.0150
85021.010.675.211.12.1149
a Reaction conditions: Pd catalyst (3.0 μmol), NaBArF (1.5 equiv.), toluene/CH2Cl2 (98 mL/2 mL), 30 min, 750 rpm, at least two runs, unless noted otherwise. b Activity is in unit of g mol−1 h−1. c Determined by GPC in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 150 °C using a light scattering detector. d Number of branches per 1000C, as determined by 1H NMR in CDCl3 at 25 °C. e 8 h.
Table
Table 5. Copolymerization of ethylene and MA catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Pd a.
Table 5. Copolymerization of ethylene and MA catalysed by Ipty/iPr-Pd a.
EntryT (°C)Yield (g)Act. (104) bX (mol%) cMn (104) dMw (104) dMw/Mn dBrs cMMA:TMA e
1300.430.540.501.63.62.315492:8
2500.710.890.774.06.61.614573:27
3700.871.091.253.97.41.913862:38
4900.330.421.981.83.82.112853:47
5 f700.901.120.714.79.32.014364:36
6 g700.380.482.212.54.61.913760:40
a Reaction conditions: Pd catalyst (10.0 μmol), NaBArF (1.5 equiv.), galvinoxyl (5.0 equiv), MA (1.0 mol/L), toluene/CH2Cl2 (23 mL/2 mL), ethylene (8 bar), 8 h, 750 rpm, at least two runs, unless noted otherwise. b Activity is in unit of g mol−1 h−1. c X = Incorporation of polar monomer, Brs = Number of branches per 1000C, as determined by 1H NMR in CDCl3 at 25 °C. d Determined by GPC in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 150 °C using a light scattering detector. e The ratio of MA incorporated into the main chain of the copolymer and MA incorporated at the terminal of branches of the copolymer (MMA:TMA), as determined by 13C NMR in CDCl3 at 25 °C. f MA (0.5 mol/L). g MA (2.0 mol/L).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jian, Z. Unsymmetrical Strategy on α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Mediated Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. Molecules 2022, 27, 8942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248942

AMA Style

Ma X, Zhang Y, Jian Z. Unsymmetrical Strategy on α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Mediated Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. Molecules. 2022; 27(24):8942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Xin, Yixin Zhang, and Zhongbao Jian. 2022. "Unsymmetrical Strategy on α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Mediated Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations" Molecules 27, no. 24: 8942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248942

APA Style

Ma, X., Zhang, Y., & Jian, Z. (2022). Unsymmetrical Strategy on α-Diimine Nickel and Palladium Mediated Ethylene (Co)Polymerizations. Molecules, 27(24), 8942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248942

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop