Next Article in Journal
Azumamides A-E: Isolation, Synthesis, Biological Activity, and Structure–Activity Relationship
Next Article in Special Issue
Chloroquine-Based Mitochondrial ATP Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Dimensional Elimination of β-Lactams in the Rural Wetland: Molecule Design and Screening for More Antibacterial and Degradable Substitutes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, In Silico and In Vivo Toxicity Assessment of Functionalized Pyridophenanthridinones via Sequential MW-Assisted Intramolecular Friedel-Crafts Alkylation and Direct C–H Arylation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 23
10.3390/molecules27238437
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Semisynthesis and Pesticidal Activities of Novel Cholesterol Ester Derivatives Containing Cinnamic Acid-like Fragments

by
Rongfei Lu
1,†,
Jianwei Xu
1,†,
Zhen Wang
1,
Shaoyong Zhang
2,
Hailong Wang
3,
Hui Xu
1,* and
Min Lv
1,*
1
College of Plant Protection, Northwest A & F University, Xianyang 712100, China
2
Key Laboratory of Vector Biology and Pathogen Control of Zhejiang Province, College of Life Science, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, China
3
Yan’an Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yan’an 716000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8437; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238437
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Compounds and New Analogs in Chemical Synthesis: A Themed Issue in Honor of Professor Dr. Mark Moloney)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the extensive use of agrochemicals resulting in the emergence of pesticide resistance and ecological environment problems, the research and development of new alternatives for crop protection is highly desirable. In order to discover potent natural product-based insecticide candidates, a series of new cholesterol ester derivatives containing cinnamic acid-like fragments at the C-7 position were synthesized. Some derivatives showed potent pesticidal activities. Against Mythimna separata Walker, compounds 2a, Id, Ig, and IIg showed 2.1–2.4-fold growth-inhibitory activity of the precursor cholesterol. Against Plutella xylostella Linnaeus, compounds Ig, IIf, and IIi exhibited 1.9–2.1-fold insecticidal activity of cholesterol. These results will pave the way for the future synthesis of cholesterol-based derivatives as agrochemicals.

1. Introduction

Cholesterol (1), a biological endogenous substance, has shown a variety of antitumor, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and insecticide activities [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Cinnamic acid (Figure 1), as a main component of Cinnamomum cassia Presl, has displayed a range of pharmaceutical and agricultural activities [11,12,13]. In addition, several cholesterol oxime esters containing cinnamic acid-like fragments (1′) have shown promising insecticidal activities [14]. Nowadays, due to the extensive and irrational use of chemical insecticides resulting in pest resistance and ecological environment problems, the research and development of new pesticides for crop protection is highly desirable [15,16,17,18]. Because of the characteristics of natural secondary metabolites as an unparalleled source of bioactive products, currently, the study of natural product-based insecticides as an important alternative to classic agrochemicals has received much attention [19,20,21]. Therefore, in order to develop prospective cholesterol-based pesticide candidates, a series of new cholesterol derivatives I and II (Figure 1) were designed and synthesized by a combination of cholesterol and cinnamic acid-like fragments via the ester bond at the C-7 position of cholesterol. Meanwhile, two typically crop-threatening insect pests, Mythimna separata Walker (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), were used as the tested biotargets for assessment of the insecticidal activities of cholesterol derivatives I and II [22,23].

2. Materials and Methods

Multi-generation sensitive strains of Mythimna separata and Plutella xylostella (3rd instar larvae) were raised in our lab. Cholesterol was purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The melting point (mp) was determined using the XT-415 digital melting point apparatus (Beijing Tech Instruments, Ltd., Beijing, China) and was uncorrected. 1H NMR spectra (Supplementary Materials) were obtained using Avance III 500 MHz equipment (Bruker, Germany). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained with a MicrOTOF Q II instrument (Bruker, Germany). Infrared spectroscopy (IR) was obtained with a TENSOR-27 instrument (Bruker, Germany).

2.1. Synthesis of Compounds 2a and 2b

A mixture of cholesterol (1, 5 mmol), triethylamine (10 mmol), and substituted acyl chloride (7 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 14 or 17 h. Then, CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added to the mixture, which was washed with brine. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and purified by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/dichloromethane (4/1, v/v) to obtain 2a and 2b.
Data for 2a: CAS: 604-32-0. Yield: 79%, white solid, mp 188–190 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2948, 1717, 1656, 1531, 1454, 1370, 1271, 1110, 710; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.05 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.42 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, H-6), 4.83–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.47 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 1.97–2.03 (m, 3H), 1.90–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.86 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.78 (m, 1H), 1.45–1.61 (m, 7H), 1.33–1.38 (m, 3H), 1.09–1.27 (m, 8H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.99–1.02 (m, 2H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.69 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calcd for C34H50O2Na ([M + Na]+), 513.3616; found, 513.3709.
Data for 2b: CAS: 30591-44-7. Yield: 89%, white solid, mp 180–182 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2949, 2859, 1710, 1464, 1276, 1112, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.42 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, H-6), 4.81–4.87 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.46 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 1.97–2.03 (m, 3H), 1.89–1.92 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.85 (m, 1H), 1.68–1.76 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.59 (m, 7H), 1.33–1.38 (m, 3H), 1.09–1.27 (m, 8H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.99–1.02 (m, 2H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.68 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calcd for C35H52O2Na ([M + Na]+), 527.3865; found, 527.3862.

2.2. Synthesis of Compounds 3a and 3b

A mixture of compounds 2a and 2b (4 mmol), CrO3 (4 mmol), pyridine (8 mmol), and 70% t-BuOOH (40 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 5 or 12 h. The mixture was extracted by CH2Cl2 (30 mL × 2). The combined organic phase was washed with saturated aq. NaHSO3 (15 mL × 3) and brine (15 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and purified by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/dichloromethane (1/3, v/v), yielded 3a and 3b.
Data for 3a: CAS: 6997-41-7. Yield: 93%, white solid, mp 158–160 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2944, 2866, 1717, 1667, 1459, 1275, 1113, 712; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.05 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.75 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.94–5.01 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.60–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.38–2.43 (m, 1H), 2.23–2.28 (m, 1H), 2.11–2.14 (m, 1H), 2.01–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.94 (m, 2H), 1.48–1.61 (m, 5H), 1.34–1.39 (m, 5H), 1.26 (s, 3H), 1.07–1.15 (m, 6H), 1.01–1.04 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H), 0.69 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C34H48O3Na ([M + Na]+), 527.3506; found, 527.3501.
Data for 3b: Yield: 74%, white solid, mp 161–162 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2949, 2865, 1715, 1667, 1461, 1278, 1112, 746; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.93 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.24 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.74 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.92–4.99 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.58–2.71 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.23–2.27 (m, 1H), 2.09–2.14 (m, 1H), 2.00–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.89–1.94 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.83 (m, 1H), 1.48–1.59 (m, 4H), 1.27–1.39 (m, 7H), 1.25 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.18 (m, 6H), 1.00–1.04 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.69 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C35H50O3Na ([M + Na]+), 541.3658; found, 541.3659.

2.3. Synthesis of Compounds 4a and 4b

Compound 3a or b (4 mmol) was dissolved in methanol/dichloromethane (1/1, v/v), and sodium borohydride (6 mmol) was added in batches under an ice bath. Then, it was raised naturally to room temperature. When the reaction was complete, methanol was removed and ethyl acetate (30 mL) was added to the mixture, which was washed with brine. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated, and purified by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/dichloromethane (1/1, v/v) to obtain 4a and 4b.
Data for 4a: CAS: 17974-80-0. Yield: 65%, white solid, mp 192–193 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 3490, 2946, 2859, 1691, 1456, 1282, 1122, 708; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.05 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 2.48–2.50 (m, 2H), 2.02–2.04 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.93 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.28–1.58 (m, 12H), 1.14–1.22 (m, 6H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 0.98–1.04 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.70 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C34H50O3Na ([M + Na]+), 529.3645; found, 529.3658.
Data for 4b: Yield: 68%, white solid, mp 189–191 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 3483, 2948, 2861, 1688, 1285, 1121, 1026, 751; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.83–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 2.46–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 1.99–2.04 (m, 2H), 1.86–1.92 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.30–1.56 (m, 12H), 1.12–1.21 (m, 6H), 1.11 (s, 3H), 1.00–1.04 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.70 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C35H52O3Na ([M + Na]+), 543.3814; found, 543.3814.

2.4. General Procedure for Synthesis of Target Compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i)

Compound 4a or 4b (0.4 mmol) reacted with cinnamic acids (5a–i, 0.6 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 mL) in the presence of EDCI (0.6 mmol) and DMAP (0.2 mmol) at room temperature for 10–34 h. Then, the mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL). It was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and purified by PTLC eluting with petroleum ether/dichloromethane (v/v = 4:1) or petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (v/v = 15:1) to afford I(a–i)–II(a–i) in 14−53% yields.
Data forIa: Yield: 18%, white solid, mp 105–106 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2946, 2863, 1712, 1634, 1497, 1451, 1266, 1244, 1269, 1110, 710; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.52–7.54 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.44 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.00–7.04 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 6.00 (s, 2H, –OCH2O–), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.59 (m, 5H), 1.30–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.24 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H56O6Na ([M + Na]+), 703.3975; found, 703.3979.
Data forIb: Yield: 21%, white solid, mp 106–107 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2944, 2864, 1711, 1636, 1507, 1459, 1280, 1243, 1167, 708; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.52–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.02–7.05 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.28 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, H-2´), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.25–4.28 (m, 4H, –OCH2CH2O–), 2.49 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.02–2.07 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.81 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.62 (m, 5H), 1.29–1.34 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.22 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.05–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C45H58O6Na ([M + Na]+), 717.4134; found, 717.4131.
Data for Ic: Yield: 32%, white solid, mp 106–108 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2959, 2858, 1723, 1639, 1455, 1213, 679; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.52–7.55 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.44 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 6.44 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.22 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.03–2.07 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.60 (m, 5H), 1.29–1.33 (m, 4H), 1.20–1.24 (m, 4H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.04–1.14 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.73 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C43H56O4Na ([M + Na]+), 659.4030; found, 659.4076.
Data for Id: Yield: 14%, white solid, mp 89–91 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2955, 2860, 1713, 1640, 1510, 1457, 1276, 1231, 1168, 705; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.65 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.50–7.56 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.05–7.08 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.36 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.22 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.82 (m, 3H), 1.47–1.60 (m, 5H), 1.29–1.33 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.22 (m, 4H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–0.99 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C43H55FO4Na ([M + Na]+), 677.3951; found, 677.3982.
Data for Ie: Yield: 29%, white solid, mp 115–117 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2944, 2862, 1711, 1635, 1507, 1459, 1278, 1167, 1116, 1069, 710; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.02–8.04 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.63 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.52–7.56 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.46 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.34–7.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.40 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.50 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.02–2.07 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.41–1.63 (m, 5H), 1.27–1.34 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.24 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C43H55ClO4Na ([M + Na]+), 693.3681; found, 693.3687.
Data for If: Yield: 18%, white solid, mp 112–114 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2945, 2860, 1711, 1638, 1456, 1273, 1171, 816, 706; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.50–7.56 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.44 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.37–7.39 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.42 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.70–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.45–1.62 (m, 5H), 1.30–1.35 (m, 4H), 1.20–1.24 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C43H55BrO4Na ([M + Na]+), 737.3172, 739.3169; found, 737.3181, 739.3161.
Data for Ig: Yield: 20%, white solid, mp 98–100 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2949, 2864, 1715, 1641, 1275, 1173, 1123, 1037, 1013, 985, 833, 709; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.63 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 7.53–7.56 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.44 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.51 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.04–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.94–1.97 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.45–1.62 (m, 5H), 1.30–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.22–1.25 (m, 4H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.07–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.98–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.73 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H55F3O4Na ([M + Na]+), 727.3950; found, 727.3958.
Data for Ih: Yield: 53%, white solid, mp 90–92 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2945, 2862, 1713, 1638, 1456, 1274, 1169, 808, 708; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.53–7.55 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.41–7.43 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.39 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.82 (m, 3H), 1.46–1.64 (m, 5H), 1.30–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.22–1.25 (m, 4H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.73 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H58O4Na ([M + Na]+), 673.4227; found, 673.6233.
Data for Ii: Yield: 30%, white solid, mp 100–102 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2945, 2862, 1710, 1635, 1605, 1260, 1166, 824, 708; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.04 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.52–7.55 (m, 1H, Ar-H), 7.46–7.49 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.88–6.91 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.30 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.85–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.83 (s, 3H), 2.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.46–1.60 (m, 5H), 1.30–1.38 (m, 4H), 1.22–1.25 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H58O5Na ([M + Na]+), 689.4197; found, 689.4182.
Data for IIa: Yield: 16%, white solid, mp 98–100 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2952, 2860, 1702, 1635, 1451, 1231, 1109, 808, 704; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.91–8.04 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.59 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.00–7.03 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.81 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 6.00 (s, 2H, –OCH2O–), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.91 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.47–2.50 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 2H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.71–1.83 (m, 3H), 1.59–1.62 (m, 2H), 1.47–1.54 (m, 3H), 1.30–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.18–1.24 (m, 5H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C45H58O6Na ([M + Na]+), 717.4131; found, 717.4138.
Data for IIb: Yield: 21%, white solid, mp 107–109 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2941, 2861, 1711, 1638, 1509, 1461, 1280, 805, 748; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.57 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3´), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.02–7.05 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 6.28 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2´), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.19 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.26–4.29 (m, 4H, –OCH2CH2O–), 2.48 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.01–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.91–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.79 (m, 3H), 1.44–1.54 (m, 5H), 1.29–1.31 (m, 3H), 1.20–1.22 (m, 5H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.05–1.09 (m, 4H), 0.99–1.00 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C46H60O6Na ([M + Na]+), 731.4288; found, 731.4285.
Data for IIc: Yield: 45%, white solid, mp 112–114 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2940, 2862, 1706, 1640, 1273, 1175, 1112, 990, 944, 758; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.51–7.53 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.36–7.38 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.44 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.36 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.22 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.90 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.85 (m, 3H), 1.46–1.61 (m, 4H), 1.30–1.38 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.26 (m, 5H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.03–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS [ESI]: calculated for C44H58O4Na ([M + Na]+), 673.4233; found, 673.4231.
Data for IId: Yield: 19%, white solid, mp 108–110 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2948, 2863, 1712, 1639, 1609, 1274, 1168, 1108, 829, 748; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.50–7.52 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.05–7.08 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 6.36 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.34 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.82 (m, 3H), 1.57–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.50 (m, 3H), 1.31–1.36 (m, 4H), 1.21–1.25 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H57FO4Na ([M + Na]+), 691.4139; found, 691.4138.
Data for IIe: Yield: 27%, white solid, mp 96–98 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2927, 2854, 1727, 1643, 1215, 1113, 806, 690; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.92 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.63 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.44–7.46 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.33–7.36 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.40 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.34 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.48 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.81 (m, 3H), 1.44–1.55 (m, 5H), 1.29–1.31 (m, 3H), 1.19–1.23 (m, 5H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.10 (m, 4H), 0.97–0.99 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 3H), 0.84 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H57ClO4Na ([M + Na]+), 707.3843; found, 707.3843.
Data for IIf: Yield: 20%, white solid, mp 96–98 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2946, 2862, 1713, 1637, 1272, 1171, 1110, 818, 748; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.91–8.04 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.61 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.52 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.42 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.34 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.84–4.90 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.48 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 2H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.59–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.44–1.52 (m, 3H), 1.30–1.37 (m, 4H), 1.20–1.26 (m, 5H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.04–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C44H57BrO4Na ([M + Na]+), 751.3338; found, 751.3333.
Data for IIg: Yield: 18%, white solid, mp 84–86 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2948, 2864, 1715, 1275, 1173, 1122, 833, 748; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.69 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.63 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.50 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.82–4.90 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.06 (m, 2H), 1.93–1.96 (m, 1H), 1.67–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.47–1.62 (m, 4H), 1.30–1.41 (m, 4H), 1.21–1.23 (m, 4H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.06–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.96–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.93 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.73 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C45H57F3O4Na ([M + Na]+), 741.4107; found, 741.4101.
Data for IIh: Yield: 26%, white solid, mp 93–95 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2947, 2863, 1712, 1635, 1272, 1169, 1109, 811, 749; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.66 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.43 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.39 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.82–4.89 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.49 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.71–1.84 (m, 3H), 1.60 (s, 2H), 1.47–1.54 (m, 3H), 1.30–1.41 (m, 4H), 1.19–1.23 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.03–1.12 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C45H60O4Na ([M + Na]+), 687.4389; found, 687.4390.
Data for IIi: Yield: 34%, white solid, mp 97–99 °C; IR cm−1 (KBr): 2946, 2863, 1711, 1634, 1607, 1263, 1167, 826, 749; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.91–8.04 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.64 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-3′), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 6.31 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 5.35 (s, 1H, H-6), 5.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.83–4.90 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.83 (s, 3H), 2.47–2.50 (m, 2H), 2.40 (s, 3H), 2.03–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.92–1.95 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.82 (m, 3H), 1.61 (s, 2H), 1.46–1.54 (m, 3H), 1.31–1.37 (m, 4H), 1.20–1.23 (m, 4H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.03–1.13 (m, 4H), 0.97–1.01 (m, 1H), 0.92 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H), 0.84 (s, 3H), 0.72 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI): calculated for C45H60O5Na ([M + Na]+), 703.4338; found, 703.4337.

2.5. Biological Assay

2.5.1. Insecticidal Activity of Compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against M. separata

Thirty-six early 3rd-instar larvae of M. separata were selected as the tested insects for each compound. Solutions of tested compounds (rotenone as a positive control) were prepared in acetone (containing 0.5% N-methylpyrrolidone) at 1 mg/mL. After being dipped into the corresponding solution for 3 s, wheat leaf discs (1 × 1 cm) were taken out and dried. Wheat leaf discs were treated by acetone (containing 0.5% N-methylpyrrolidone) alone as the blank control group (CK). Some of the above discs were added to each culture dish (12 insects per dish). Once the discs were consumed, additional ones were added. After 48 h, the rest of compound-soaked discs were cleaned out, and the untreated ones were added until the end of pupae (temperature: 25 ± 2 °C; RH: 65–80%; photoperiod: light/dark = 12 h/12 h). Their corrected final mortality rate values were calculated as follows: corrected mortality rate (%) = (T − C) × 100/(100% − C); C is the mortality rate of CK, and T is the mortality rate of the treated M. separata [4,24].

2.5.2. Insecticidal Activity of Compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against P. xylostella

For each compound, 45 3rd-instar larvae of P. xylostella were selected. Solutions of tested compounds (β-cypermethrin as a positive control) were prepared in acetone (containing 0.5% N-methylpyrrolidone) at 1 mg/mL. Fresh cabbage leaf discs (0.5 × 0.5 cm) were dipped into the corresponding solution for 3 s and dried. Fresh cabbage leaf discs (0.5 × 0.5 cm) were treated by acetone (containing 0.5% N-methylpyrrolidone) alone as the blank control group (CK). Some of the above discs were added to each culture dish (15 insects per dish). Once the discs were consumed, additional ones were added (temperature: 25 ± 2 °C; RH: 65–80%; photoperiod: light/dark = 14 h/10 h). Their 24 and 48 h corrected mortality rate values were calculated in the same way as mentioned above. Finally, the 48 h LC50 values of some potent compounds were calculated [24].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

As shown in Scheme 1, intermediates 2a and 2b were prepared in 79 and 89% yields from one reacting with acyl chlorides [4,24]. Then, compounds 2a and 2b were oxidized by CrO3/t-BuOOH to give compounds 3a and 3b in 93% and 74% yields, respectively. In the presence of sodium borohydride, to our delight, the carbonyl group at the C-7 position of 3a and 3b was stereoselectively reduced to β-OH, and the corresponding compounds 4a and 4b were obtained in 65% and 68% yields, respectively. Finally, compounds 4a and 4b reacted with the cinnamic acid-like fragments (5a–i) to afford target compounds I(a–i)−II(a–i) in 14–53% yields [7]. Their structures were characterized by HRMS, melting points, IR, and 1H NMR. Notably, the steric structure of 4a (CCDC: 2214110) was further determined by X-ray diffraction (Figure 2). Obviously, configurations of the ester group at the C-3 position and the hydroxyl group at the C-7 position of 4a were all β.

3.2. Insecticidal Activities

The results of the insecticidal activity of I(a–i)–II(a–i) against M. separata treated at 1 mg/mL are shown in Table 1. Among them, the corrected final mortality rates (CFMRs) of 2a, Id, Ig, and IIg were 45.4%, 48.4%, 51.5%, and 46.8%, respectively, whereas the CFMR of the precursor 1 was only 21.2%; that is, the growth-inhibitory activity of compounds 2a, Id, Ig, and IIg was 2.1–2.4-fold that of cholesterol. Compared with 1, compounds 2a,b; 3a,b; and 4a,b showed better insecticidal activity, indicating that structural modifications at the C-3 and C-7 positions were necessary for insecticidal activity. Moreover, compounds 2a–4a (R1 = Ph) showed more promising insecticidal activity than the corresponding ones 2b–4b (R1 = 4-MePh) (e.g., 2a vs. 2b; 3a vs. 3b; 4a vs. 4b). To compounds Ia–Ii (R1 = Ph), the introduction of cinnamic acids containing the fluorine atom or CF3 on the hydroxyl group of compound 4a resulted in promising compounds. For example, the CFMRs of Id (R2 = H, R3 = 4-F) and Ig (R2 = H, R3 = 4-CF3) were 48.4% and 51.5%, respectively, and the CFMRs of compounds Ie (R2 = H, R3 = 4-Cl) and If (R2 = H, R3 = 4-Br) were the same as that of 4a. Although the CFMR of Ii (R2 = H, R3 = 4-OMe) was 42.4%, the CFMRs of Ia (R2R3 = 3,4-OCH2O-), Ib (R2R3 = 3,4-OCH2CH2O-), and Ih (R2 = H, R3 = 4-Me) were only 33.3%, 36.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. The same structure–activity relationships were also observed for compounds IIa–IIi (R1 = 4-MePh): for instance, the CFMRs of IId (R2 = H, R3 = 4-F) and IIg (R2 = H, R3 = 4-CF3) were 37.5% and 46.8%, respectively, whereas the CFMRs of IIa–c,e,f,h,i were 25.0–34.3%. This demonstrates that the introduction of the fluorine atom or CF3 on the para position of the phenyl of Ic and IIc was very important for the insecticidal activity against M. separata.
The results of the insecticidal activity of I(a–i)–II(a–i) against P. xylostella treated at 1 mg/mL are shown in Table 2. Among them, the CFMRs of Ig, IIf, and IIi were 40.9%, 44.1%, and 41.8%, respectively, whereas the CFMR of the precursor 1 was only 18.6%. Similarly, compounds 2a–4a (R1 = Ph) showed better insecticidal activity against P. xylostella than the corresponding ones 2b–4b (R1 = 4-MePh); for compounds Ia–Ii (R1 = Ph), the introduction of cinnamic acids containing the fluorine atom or CF3 on the hydroxyl group of compound 4a can result in the promising compounds Id (R2 = H, R3 = 4-F) and Ig (R2 = H, R3 = 4-CF3). However, for IIa–IIi (R1 = 4-MePh), compounds IIf (R2 = H, R3 = 4-Br) and IIi (R2 = H, R3 = 4-OMe) showed potent insecticidal activity against P. xylostella.
As described in Table 3, three potent compounds, Ig, IIf, and IIi, were further evaluated against P. xylostella, and their LC50 values were 1.560, 1.390, and 1.508 mg/mL, respectively. Namely, compared with that of their precursor 1 (LC50: 2.946 mg/mL), they exhibited 1.9–2.1-fold more potent insecticidal activity.

4. Conclusions

In summary, to develop new natural product-based pesticide candidates, a series of new cholesterol ester derivatives containing cinnamic acid-like fragments at the C-7 position were prepared. Against M. separata, compounds 2a, Id, Ig, and IIg showed 2.1–2.4 times more potent growth-inhibitory activity than cholesterol. Against P. xylostella, compounds Ig, IIf, and IIi exhibited 1.9–2.1 times more promising insecticidal activity than cholesterol. The structure–activity relationships of the compounds suggest that the introduction of the fluorine atom or CF3 on the para position of the phenyl of Ic and IIc was very important for the insecticidal activity against M. separata; and against P. xylostella, the introduction of the fluorine atom or CF3 on the para position of the phenyl of Ic was necessary for insecticidal activity, whereas the introduction of the bromine atom or methoxy on the para position of the phenyl of IIc was vital for insecticidal activity. These results will provide a basis for guiding the synthesis of novel cholesterol derivatives as new pesticidal agents in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27238437/s1, 1H NMR spectra.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, H.W.; Investigation, Z.W.; Resources, S.Z.; Data curation, R.L. and J.X.; Project administration, H.X.; Funding acquisition, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hongli Zhang for his finishing 1H NMR spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Cui, J.; Lin, Q.; Gan, C.; Yao, Q.; Su, W.; Huang, Y. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of some 4,6-diaza-A,B-dihomo-steroid bilactams. Steroids 2014, 79, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choteau, F.; Durand, G.; Ranchon-Cole, I.; Cercy, C.; Pucci, B. Cholesterol-based α-phenyl-N-tert-butyl nitrone derivatives as antioxidants against light-induced retinal degeneration. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 7405–7409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghosh, P.; Ghosh, A.; Mandal, A.; Sultana, S.S.; Dey, S.; Pal, C. Oxysterols: Synthesis and anti-leishmanial activities. Steroids 2016, 107, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jiang, L.; Wang, H.; Hao, M.; Wang, Z.; Lv, M. Semisynthesis of conjugates from matrine/cholesterol with piperic acid/piperic acids-like as insecticidal and aphicidal agents. Heterocycles 2022, 104, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar]
  5. Banday, M.R.; Farshori, N.N.; Ahmad, A.; Khan, A.U.; Rauf, A. Synthesis and characterization of novel fatty acid analogs of cholesterol: In vitro antimicrobial activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 1459–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, C.; Shao, Y.; Zhi, X.; Huan, Q.; Yu, X.; Yao, X.; Xu, H. Semisynthesis and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of some cholesterol-based hydrazone derivatives as insecticidal agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 4806–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xu, J.; Lv, M.; Hao, M.; Li, T.; Zhang, S.; Xu, H. Natural-product-based pesticides: Semisynthesis, structural elucidation, and evaluation of new cholesterol-matrine conjugates as pesticidal agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 50, 128350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. White, C.R.; Garber, D.W.; Anantharamaiah, G.M. Anti-inflammatory and cholesterol-reducing properties of apolipoprotein mimetics: A review. J. Lipid Res. 2014, 55, 2007–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Smith, B.; Land, H. Anticancer activity of the cholesterol exporter ABCA1 gene. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Laka, K.; Makgoo, L.; Mbita, Z. Cholesterol-lowering phytochemicals: Targeting the mevalonate pathway for anticancer interventions. Front Genet. 2022, 13, 841639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kurup, A.; Kumar, A.V.; Rao, M.N.A. Antiinflammatory activity of cinnamic acids. Die Pharm. 1989, 44, 870. [Google Scholar]
  12. Godoy, M.E.; Rotelli, A.; Pelzer, L.; Tonn, C.E. Antiinflammatory activity of cinnamic acid esters. Molecules 2000, 5, 547–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, T.; Lan, Q.; Liu, N.N. Larvicidal activity of mosquito sterol carrier protein-2 inhibitors to the insecticide-resistant mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 1430–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, T.; Lv, M.; Xu, H. Construction of new oxime esters of cholesterol containing piperic acid-like fragments as insecticidal agents against Aphis citricola Van der Goot (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Plutella xylostella Linnaeus (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 62, 128634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heckel, D.G. Insecticide resistance after silent spring. Science 2012, 337, 1612–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sun, Z.; Lv, M.; Yu, X.; Xu, H. Application of sustainable natural bioresources in crop protection: Insight into a podophyllotoxin-derived botanical pesticide for regulating insect vestigial wing of Mythimna separata Walker. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 3945–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, X.; Li, T.; Shan, X.; Lu, R.; Hao, M.; Lv, M.; Sun, Z.; Xu, H. High value-added use of citrus industrial wastes in agriculture: Semisynthesis and anti-tobacco mosaic virus/insecticidal activities of ester derivatives of limonin modified in the B ring. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12241–12251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Hua, X.W.; Wu, C.C.; Zhou, S.; Wang, B.L.; Li, Z.M. Synthesis of osthole derivatives with grignard geagents and their larvicidal activities on mosquitoes. Chin. J. Chem. 2015, 33, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, B.; Yu, M.; Lv, M.; Xu, H. Synthesis of 2′(2′,6′)-(di)halogenoisoxazolopodophyllic acids-based amides derived from a naturally occurring lignan podophyllotoxin and their acaricidal activity. Heterocycles 2018, 97, 541–549. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yu, X.; Che, Z.; Xu, H. Recent advances in the chemistry and biology of podophyllotoxins. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 4467–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Xu, H. Recent progress in the chemistry and biology of limonoids. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 35191–35220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Xiong, L.; Li, Z. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of novel N-pyridylpyrazole carbonyl thioureas. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cho, J.R.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, H.S.; Yoo, J.K. Some biochemical evidence on the selective insecticide toxicity between the two aphids, Aphis citricola and Myzus rnalisuctus (Homoptera: Phididae), and their predator, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Asia-Pacif. Entomol. 2002, 5, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, H.; Zhang, K.; Lv, M.; Hao, M. Construction of cholesterol oxime ether derivatives containing isoxazoline/isoxazole fragments and their agricultural bioactive properties/control efficiency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 8098–8109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 08437 g001 550
Figure 1. Design of cholesterol esters derivatives I and II.
Figure 1. Design of cholesterol esters derivatives I and II.
Molecules 27 08437 g001
Molecules 27 08437 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of target compounds I(a–i)−II(a–i).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of target compounds I(a–i)−II(a–i).
Molecules 27 08437 sch001
Molecules 27 08437 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray crystal structure of compound 4a.
Figure 2. X-ray crystal structure of compound 4a.
Molecules 27 08437 g002
Table
Table 1. Insecticidal activity of compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against M. separata at 1 mg/mL.
Table 1. Insecticidal activity of compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against M. separata at 1 mg/mL.
CompoundCorrected Final Mortality Rate (Mean ± SE, %) a
121.2 ± 2.7
2a45.4 ± 4.8
2b28.1 ± 2.7
3a42.4 ± 2.7
3b31.2 ± 2.7
4a39.3 ± 2.7
4b34.3 ± 4.8
Ia33.3 ± 2.7
Ib36.3 ± 4.8
Ic27.2 ± 4.8
Id48.4 ± 2.7
Ie39.3 ± 2.7
If39.3 ± 2.7
Ig51.5 ± 2.7
Ih30.3 ± 2.7
Ii42.4 ± 2.7
IIa25.0 ± 4.8
IIb31.2 ± 2.7
IIc28.1 ± 2.7
IId37.5 ± 5.5
IIe25.0 ± 4.8
IIf34.3 ± 4.8
IIg46.8 ± 2.7
IIh31.2 ± 2.7
IIi28.1 ± 2.7
rotenone87.8 ± 2.7
a Values are mean ± SE of three replicates.
Table
Table 2. The insecticidal activity of compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against P. xyllostella at 1 mg/mL.
Table 2. The insecticidal activity of compounds I(a–i)–II(a–i) against P. xyllostella at 1 mg/mL.
CompoundCorrected Mortality Rate (Mean ± SE, %) a
24 h48 h
16.8 ± 2.218.6 ± 2.2
2a13.6 ± 2.223.2 ± 0
2b15.5 ± 2.220.4 ± 2.2
3a15.9 ± 2.225.5 ± 2.2
3b11.1 ± 2.222.7 ± 2.2
4a22.2 ± 2.229.5 ± 2.2
4b17.7 ± 2.225.0 ± 3.8
Ia22.2 ± 2.231.8 ± 3.8
Ib11.1 ± 2.225.0 ± 3.8
Ic13.3 ± 022.7 ± 2.2
Id24.4 ± 2.238.6 ± 3.8
Ie8.9 ± 2.229.5 ± 2.2
If20.0 ± 036.3 ± 2.2
Ig26.6 ± 3.840.9 ± 2.2
Ih15.5 ± 2.227.2 ± 2.2
Ii17.7 ± 2.234.0 ± 2.2
IIa15.9 ± 2.227.9 ± 2.2
IIb20.0 ± 3.836.3 ± 2.2
IIc13.3 ± 3.820.4 ± 2.2
IId15.9 ± 2.225.5 ± 2.2
IIe22.2 ± 2.234.0 ± 2.2
IIf25.0 ± 3.844.1 ± 3.8
IIg20.4 ± 2.234.8 ± 4.4
IIh11.3 ± 018.6 ± 2.2
IIi20.4 ± 2.241.8 ± 2.2
β-cypermethrin56.8 ± 2.297.6 ± 2.2
a Values are mean ± SE of three replicates.
Table
Table 3. LC50 values at 48 h of compounds 1, Ig, IIf, and IIi against P. xyllostella a.
Table 3. LC50 values at 48 h of compounds 1, Ig, IIf, and IIi against P. xyllostella a.
CompoundLinear Regression EquationLC50 (mg/mL)Confidence Interval 95% (mg/mL)r
1Y = −0.816 + 1.738 X2.9462.293–3.9230.992
IgY = −0.253 + 1.308 X1.5601.136–2.3290.989
IIfY = –0.201 + 1.405 X1.3901.021–1.9820.997
IIiY = −0.239 + 1.339 X1.5081.095–2.2320.998
β-cypermethrinY = 1.583 + 2.054 X0.1700.132–0.2110.989
a Values are mean ± SE of three replicates.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, R.; Xu, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Xu, H.; Lv, M. Semisynthesis and Pesticidal Activities of Novel Cholesterol Ester Derivatives Containing Cinnamic Acid-like Fragments. Molecules 2022, 27, 8437. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238437

AMA Style

Lu R, Xu J, Wang Z, Zhang S, Wang H, Xu H, Lv M. Semisynthesis and Pesticidal Activities of Novel Cholesterol Ester Derivatives Containing Cinnamic Acid-like Fragments. Molecules. 2022; 27(23):8437. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Rongfei, Jianwei Xu, Zhen Wang, Shaoyong Zhang, Hailong Wang, Hui Xu, and Min Lv. 2022. "Semisynthesis and Pesticidal Activities of Novel Cholesterol Ester Derivatives Containing Cinnamic Acid-like Fragments" Molecules 27, no. 23: 8437. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238437

APA Style

Lu, R., Xu, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, H., Xu, H., & Lv, M. (2022). Semisynthesis and Pesticidal Activities of Novel Cholesterol Ester Derivatives Containing Cinnamic Acid-like Fragments. Molecules, 27(23), 8437. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238437

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop