Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Selected Phenothiazines and Phenazines Rationalized Based on DFT Calculation
Next Article in Special Issue
An Oligopeptide-Protected Ultrasmall Gold Nanocluster with Peroxidase-Mimicking and Cellular-Imaging Capacities
Previous Article in Journal
Three for the Price of One: Concomitant I⋯N, I⋯O, and I⋯π Halogen Bonds in the Same Crystal Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spectroscopic Behaviour of Copper(II) Complexes Containing 2-Hydroxyphenones
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 21
10.3390/molecules27217551
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pillar-Layered Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Specific Amino Acid and Photocatalyzing Rhodamine B Degradation

by
Zi-Qing Huang
†,
Shu-Man Zhao
†,
Jia-Qi Chen
,
Yue Zhao
and
Wei-Yin Sun
*
Coordination Chemistry Institute, State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing National Laboratory of Microstructures, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7551; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217551
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Properties of Metal Complexes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have presented potential for detection of specific species and catalytic application due to their diverse framework structures and functionalities. In this work, two novel pillar-layered MOFs [Cd6(DPA)2(NTB)4(H2O)4]n·n(DPA·5DMA·H2O) (1) and [Cu2(DPA)(OBA)2]n·n(2.5DMF·H2O) (2) [DPA = 2,5-di(pyridin-4-yl)aniline, H3NTB = 4,4′,4′′-nitrilotribenzoic acid, H2OBA = 4,4′-oxydibenzoic acid, DMA = N,N-dimethylacetamide, DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide] were successfully synthesized and structurally characterized. Both 1 and 2 have three-dimensional framework structures. The fluorescent property of 1 makes it possible for sensing specific amino acid such as L-glutamic acid (Glu) and L-aspartic acid (Asp). While MOF 2 was found to be suitable for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) in the presence of H2O2. The results imply that MOFs are versatile and metal centers are important in determining their properties.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, it attracts great attention with relation to the healthy and environmental issue such as detecting specific species and degrading harmful pollutants [1,2]. The detection of definite harmful species such as nitroaromatic compounds (NACs), ketone molecules, halogen flame retardants and so on have been extensively explored, however, the study on sensing biomolecules like amino acids (AAs) is limited [3,4,5,6]. It is known that AAs play key role in varied physiological activities [7,8]. Among them, L-glutamic acid (Glu) and L-aspartic acid (Asp) are important biological neurotransmitters, but may arise undesired side effects when their content exceeds the standard. For example, excessive Glu may lead to mental diseases such as Parkinson’s syndrome and allergic reactions like headache and nausea [9]. Therefore, the accurate detection of the AA is meaningful for monitoring and diagnosing human health.
Among the reported studies, luminescent metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been recognized as efficient and versatile detector due to their variable responses to the analytes including the change of luminant color, enhancement or quenching the fluorescence [10,11]. Besides, the unique porous structure may be helpful for adsorbing target analytes which may be selectively interacting with the framework by the porous skeleton [12,13]. In our previous work, it was found that the amino-functionalized MOF, namely NH2-MIL-101, can be utilized for sensing specific AA in aqueous media via turn-on fluorescence [14]. In addition to the detection, MOFs have also been widely employed in photocatalysis, like water splitting, CO2 reduction, organic reactions and so on [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The removal of organic pollutants in the waste water is a significant project with the methods like adsorption and in situ degradation [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Among the common pollutants, organic dyes are widely utilized in industrial production, which is in large dosage and strong persistence in the environment resulting in harm to human kidneys and organs [28]. Rhodamine B (RhB) is well used and has been warned in the food industry due to its carcinogenicity and neurotoxicity [29,30]. Therefore, efficient removal of RhB is essential and photocatalytic degradation is an efficient and environment-friendly approach. It has been reported that the assistance of H2O2 is critical to the degradation of organic dyes by using Fenton-like catalysts such as iron-based oxides or complex [31]. In this work, a Cu(II) pillar-layered MOF was applied for photocatalizing degradation of RhB.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Crystal Structure Description of MOF 1

Single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) data present that 1 crystallizes in monoclinic space group of P21/c (Table 1). As illustrated in Figure 1a, the repeating unit is constructed by six Cd(II) cations, four deprotonated anions of NTB3−, two neutral ligands DPA and four coordinated H2O molecules. In addition, there are one DPA, five DMA and one water as lattice molecules in the voids of 1. There are two different trinuclear secondary building units (SBUs) containing Cd1, Cd2, Cd3 and Cd4, Cd5, Cd6, respectively (Figure 1a,b). Each Cd(II) is six-coordinated with distorted octahedral coordination geometry. For example, Cd1 is surrounded by four oxygen atoms (O16, O19, O28, O29) belonging to three carboxylate of NTB3−, one water molecule (O17) and one nitrogen atom (N4) from DPA. Cd2 is coordinated by six oxygen atoms from two water molecules (O17 and O24) and four carboxylate ones (O3, O15, O18, O26) of four different NTB3−. While Cd3 is bound by five oxygen atoms (O3, O4, O13, O14 and O27) from three carboxylate NTB3− and one nitrogen one (N2) from DPA. Cd4, Cd5 and Cd6 atoms have similar coordination environment with the Cd1, Cd2 and Cd3, respectively. It is noteworthy that Cd1 and Cd2 as well as Cd4 and Cd5 are linked together by a water molecule as bridging ligand and two carboxylate groups, while the Cd2 and Cd3 as well as Cd5 and Cd6 are joined together by one oxygen atom from a carboxylate and another carboxylate group to form the Cd3 trinuclear SBU, respectively. There are two coordination modes of (μ1-η1:η1)-(μ2-η2:η1)-(μ2-η1:η1) and (μ1-η1:η1)-(μ2-η1: η1)-(μ2-η1:η1) for NTB3− in 1 (Figure S2). The SBUs are connected by NTB3− to extend into a two-dimensional (2D) network (Figure 1b), which is further linked by DPA as two-connected pillar to generate a three-dimensional (3D) framework of 1 with pillar-layered structure (Figure 1c) [32,33]. Furthermore, the final structure of 1 has two-fold interpenetration and the topological calculation (Figure 1d) was conducted to simplify the structure of 1 by regarding the Cd3 trinuclear SBU as eight- and NTB3− as three-connected nodes. As a result, 1 is a (3,8)-connected two-node net with topological notation as {43·624·8}{43}2.

2.2. Crystal Structure Description of MOF 2

When H2OBA was used instead of H3NTB, and CuI and KI were added in the reaction, Cu-MOF 2, rather than a Cu-Cd bimetallic MOF, was achieved. 2 crystallizes in orthorhombic space group Pbcn (Table 1). The repeat unit has two Cu(II), one DPA and two OBA2− (Figure 2a). Each Cu(II) is five-coordinated with four oxygen atoms from four different carboxylate groups of OBA2− and a nitrogen from DPA. Two Cu(II) and four carboxylate groups of OBA2− form a [Cu2(COO)4] paddle wheel-like SBU, which is extended into a 2D network by the connection of OBA2− (Figure 2b). The 2D layers are further connected by DPA to form a 3D framework with the pillar-layered structure (Figure 2c). The pore volume in 2 is calculated to be 1259.9 Å3 (34.7%) by PLATON after removing the solvent molecules. The Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) surface area of MOF 2 is 136.31 m2/g determined by N2 adsorption data at 77 K (Figure S3). Considering the SBU as a six-connected node and the ligand as a linear linker, the topology of 2 can be simplified to be {44·610·8} with a 1D channel (Figure 2d).

2.3. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) and Thermogravimetric Analyses (TGA)

PXRD data were utilized to ensure the phase purity of the as-synthesized samples 1 and 2. As shown in Figure S4, the characteristic diffraction peaks of the as-synthesized samples are consistent with the simulated ones, which imply that the synthesized samples are in pure phase. The thermal stability of the MOFs was estimated by TG measurements under N2 atmosphere. As shown in Figure S5, gradual weight loss of ca. 19% in 1 was observed before 350 °C, which is caused by release of terminal water and lattice molecules (Calcd. 21.4%). The collapse of the framework of 1 starts from 360 °C. As for 2, weight loss of 18.2% was detected in the range of 25–195 °C, which is corresponding to the loss of DMF and water molecules (Calcd. 18.5%). The framework was maintained until 325 °C.

2.4. Stability of MOF 1 in Different Solvent

It is known that the practical application of MOFs is dependent on their stability [34]. Accordingly, the structural stability of 1 in different solvent was tested by PXRD. As exhibited in Figure S6, the as-synthesized 1 was respectively immerged in varied solvent including water, methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), acetonitrile, DMF, DMA, dichloromethane (DCM) and isopropanol (IPA). The PXRD patterns were almost maintained in these medium, except for the one in MeOH with slight disturbance. The high stability of 1 may be ascribed to the two-fold interpenetration [35,36].

2.5. Photoluminescence of MOF 1

It has been recognized that MOFs with d10 metal centers and π-conjugated organic ligands may possess photoluminescence (PL) [37]. Thus, MOF 1 with 3d10 metal nodes of Zn(II) may show PL. However, no PL can be expected for MOF 2 due to the 3d9 Cu(II) centers, instead photocatalytic property of MOF 2 was tested (vide post). The PL of MOF 1 as well as H3NTB and DPA ligands was examined in the solid state at room temperature. As illustrated in Figure S7, the emission of 1 at 487 nm (λex = 383 nm) may mainly arise from the ligand H3NTB since H3NTB gives an emission at 460 nm (λex = 397 nm). The red-shift and enhancement of the emission in 1 is probably caused by the coordination between the Cd(II) and NTB3− to increase the rigidity of the framework [38]. In addition, DPA shows negligible luminescence, which may be caused by the intramolecular resonance energy transfer (RET) and inner filter effect (IFE) due to presence of amino group [39,40]. To explore the influence of solvent on emission of 1 [41], PL spectra of 1 after immerging in varied solvent of DMF, EtOH, IPA, DMA, CH3CN, MeOH, toluene, DCM and H2O were recorded. As shown in Figure S8, 1 exhibits solvent dependent emission with different intensity and wavelength.

2.6. Fluorescence Sensing Specific AA by 1

The detection of specific AA is of great significance in nutritional conditioning and disease diagnosis [42]. In addition, water was employed as the detection medium since AAs generally exist in normal saline. The fluorescence sensing performance of 1 for specific AA was investigated in aqueous solution of L-tryptophan (Trp), L-tyrosine (Tyr), L-threonine (Thr), L-isoleucine (Ile), L-phenylalanine (Phe), L-alanine (Ala), L-serine (Ser), L-leucine (Leu), L-proline (Pro), L-histidine (His), glycine (Gly), L-valine (Val), L-methionine (Met), L-lysine (Lys), L-arginine (Arg), L-asparagine (Asn), L-glutamine (Gln), L-cysteine (Cys), Glu and Asp. As shown in Figure S9, the obvious quenching was detected in the aqueous solution of Glu as well as Asp, implying the sensing capacity of 1 for specific AA of Glu and Asp. Furthermore, the titration experiment was performed for reflecting the relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the concentration of the analyte (Figure 3). The linear Stern-Volmer (S-V) equation of I0/I = Ksv [Q] + 1 was utilized, where I0 and I are the luminescence intensities before and after adding the analyte, Q is the molar concentration of the analyte, and Ksv is quenching constant. As a result, the calculated Ksv are 8.43 × 103 M−1 for Glu and 9.74 × 103 M−1 for Asp. The detection limits (DL) were determined according to the formula DL = 3 σ/Ksv (σ is standard deviation) and the results are 4.44 × 10−5 M for Glu and 1.05 × 10−4 M for Asp (Table S2).
In order to clarify the mechanism of quenching process for 1 by Asp and Glu, PXRD and IR spectral measurements were conducted (Figure S10) and comparison for the samples before and after the detection was carried out. It can be seen that the PXRD patterns and IR spectra are almost the same with the original one, excluding the quenching caused by collapse of the framework structures. Furthermore, the RET and IFE effect were excluded by the non-overlapping between the PL spectra of 1 (360–650 nm) and the UV absorption of Asp and Glu (205 nm) (Figure S11). Therefore, the fluorescence quenching was considered to be in a static mode supported by the obvious increase of the fluorescence lifetime after detection (Figure S12 and Table S3) [43].

2.7. Photocatalytic Degradation of RhB by MOF 2

RhB is commonly used in industry but toxic, thus it is necessary to completely remove RhB from the wastewater. In this study, MOF 2 was attempted to degrade RhB by photocatalysis with the assistance of H2O2. Firstly, the experimental standard curve (Figure S13) was fitted by the Lambert Beer law: Abs = KBC, where Abs is the absorbance of the tested mixture, K is the molar absorbance coefficient, B is the thickness of the total solution volume and C is the concentration of RhB in aqueous solution. Then, based on the external standard method, a series of Ct/C0 photodegradation plots, where C0 is the initial concentration of RhB and Ct is the concentration at time t, were obtained with the varied reaction time (Figure 4) and the degradation efficiency was calculated by the formula (C0 − Ct)/C0 [44]. It was found that high efficiency of 99% was achieved by combination of 2 and H2O2, which is satisfactory by comparing with the reported results (Figure S14 and Table S4) [45,46,47,48]. Besides, the contrast experiments were conducted to find out the influential factors. The efficiency was declined to 25% in the dark condition and the degradation was 13% and 56% when separately catalyzed by sole MOF 2 and H2O2. In addition, the concentration and degradation efficiency were examined at varied pH and it was found that the acidic environment is more suitable for the degradation (Figures S15 and S16), while in the basic environment the less degradation efficiency may be caused by the decomposition of H2O2 to O2 and H2O [31].
Based on the above results, the remarkable synergistic effect was present and the synergistic index (SI) was calculated by the photocatalytic degradation kinetics. As shown in Figure 4, the obtained data were fitted well with pseudo-first order in the formula ln (Ct/C0) = kt, where k is the kinetic rate constant for quantitatively analyzing the photocatalytic performance. The constant k is 0.0375 min−1 in the synergistic system of 2 and H2O2, which is much larger than the one catalyzed by sole catalyst of 2 with negligible result and H2O2 with 0.007 min−1. Therefore, the SI was calculated to be ca. 5, according to the formula SI = k(1+2)/(k1 + k2).
In order to analyse the photocatalytic degradation mechanism of RhB by 2, the free radical capture experiment was carried out on the photocatalytic degradation process (Figure 5 and Figure S17). IPA, triethanolamine (TEOA) and ascorbic acid were respectively utilized as free radical trapping agents of hydroxyl radical ·OH, hole H+ and superoxide radical ·O2− [49,50,51,52]. Among them, the capture of ·OH by IPA slightly reduced the degradation efficiency and the obvious inhibition was observed for hole-scavenger TEOA and superoxide scavenger ascorbic acid with k = 0.00317 and 0.0005 min−1, respectively, indicating that the H+ and ·O2− play major role in the degradation of RhB. The reactive oxygen species (ROSs) produced in the degradation process at the first one hour were checked by EPR spectra with the assistance of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) that acted as the spin trapping agent. It is obviously that the DMPO-·OH adduct was observed with the characteristic intensities of 1:2:2:1 (Figure S18), which supported the existence of hydroxyl radical at the initial stage of degradation [53].
The photocatalytic performance of MOFs is similar to that of semiconductor material, in which the electrons were transferred between the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB). The solid UV-vis diffuse reflection spectrum of 2 shows two kinds of absorption bands in the range of 200–420 nm and 520–800 nm (Figure S19) [54]. Accordingly, the band gap of 2 was calculated to be 2.66 eV by the Tauc plot [15]. The conduction band potential, which is similar to the flat band position (VFB) of 2, was measured by Mott Schottky experiments at varied frequencies of 1, 1.5 and 2 kHz. It can be seen from Figure 6 that the slope of the curve is positive, which shows that 2 has an n-type semiconductor character. Based on these results, it can be determined that the CB of 2 is −0.56 eV. Therefore, the valence band potential VB was calculated to be 2.10 eV by considering the band gap of 2.66 eV [15]. Furthermore, the EIS of MOF 2 was presented in Figure S20.
Based on the above experimental results, the photocatalytic degradation mechanism is proposed (Figure 7). Since MOF 2 serves as an n-type semiconductor, electrons in the VB are excited to CB forming electron-hole pairs upon visible light irradiation. The photogenerated holes H+ in 2 were capable to directly react with RhB by the obvious attenuated efficiency after adding TEOA. As an electron acceptor, H2O2 was activated and produced ·OH (Figure S18), which meanwhile inhibits the recombination of electron-hole pairs for improving the photocatalytic performance of 2. And the obtained hydroxyl radical ·OH was allowed to react with the excess H2O2 to generate ·O2− [52]. In addition, the potential of CB is −0.56 eV in MOF 2, which is more negative than the required potential −0.33 eV vs. NHE for reducing O2 to ·O2−. Thus, the oxygen existed in the solution or obtained by the decomposition of H2O2 was allowed to be reduced into ·O2−. Finally, the degradation of RhB occurred by the reaction with effective superoxide radical ·O2−.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis of [Cd6(DPA)2(NTB)4(H2O)4]n·n(DPA·5DMA·H2O) (1)

The reagents involved in the experiments were purchased commercially, DPA and H3NTB were prepared according to the previous literatures [32,55]. MOF 1 was prepared by mixing Cd(ClO4)2·6H2O (21.0 mg, 0.05 mmol), 4,4′,4′′-nitrilotribenzoic acid (H3NTB) (12.4 mg, 0.03 mmol), 2,5-di(pyridin-4-yl)aniline (DPA) (8.2 mg, 0.03 mmol) in a mixed solvent of N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and H2O (3 mL, v/v = 2:1) in a 10 mL glass bottle, which was then heated at 100 °C for 3 days. Block crystals of 1 were obtained in about 88% yield based on H3NTB. Anal. Calcd. for C152H142N18O34Cd6: C, 53.08; H, 4.16; N, 7.33%. Found: C, 52.12; H, 4.21; N, 7.33%. IR (cm−1, ATR, Figure S1): 3431(w), 3358(w), 3235(w), 3057(w), 1589(s), 1538(m), 1503(m), 1382(s), 1313(m), 1272(m), 1172(m), 1101(w), 1073(w), 1013(m), 849(w), 811(w), 780(m).

3.2. Synthesis of [Cu2(DPA)(OBA)2]n·n(2.5DMF·H2O) (2)

For 2, CuI (9.5 mg, 0.05 mmol), Cd(ClO4)2·6H2O (21.0 mg, 0.05 mmol), 4,4′-oxydibenzoic acid (H2OBA) (12.9 mg, 0.05 mmol), DPA (12.4 mg, 0.05 mmol), KI (10 mg, 0.06 mmol) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (3 mL) were mixed in a 10 mL glass bottle and then heated at 100 °C for 3 days. Block crystals of 2 were collected in 67% yield based on H2OBA. Anal. Calcd. for C51.5H48.5N5.5O13.5Cu2: C, 56.88; H, 4.50; N, 7.08%. Found: C, 55.90; H, 4.29; N, 7.21%. IR (cm−1, ATR, Figure S1): 3449(w), 3352(w), 3233(w), 3061(w), 1674(m), 1604(s), 1572(m), 1500(m), 1389(s), 1229(s), 1159(m), 1087 (m), 1011(w), 1073(w), 1013(m), 875(w), 798(w), 779(m).

3.3. Fluorescent Sensing AA by MOF 1

For sensing definite AA, the as-synthesized 1 was dispersed in H2O to produce a 0.5 mg mL−1 aqueous solution. All emission spectra were recorded in the range of 350–650 nm under excitation at 380 nm.

3.4. Photocatalyzing Degradation of RhB by MOF 2

MOF 2 (20 mg) and H2O2 solution (400 μL, 30%) were added into RhB aqueous solution (50 mL, 10 mg/L) and the mixture was pre-treated with stirring in the dark for 30 min. The degradation reaction was conducted under the visible light for 2 h by a 300 W xenon arc lamp with AM 1.5G filter serving as the light source. The reaction solution was taken 3 mL in every 30 min to centrifuge and measure its corresponding UV absorption spectrum.

3.5. X-ray Crystallography

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The integration of diffraction data and intensity corrections for the Lorentz and polarization effects were performed by using SAINT program [56]. Semi-empirical absorption corrections were applied using SADABS program [57]. The structures were solved by direct methods with SHELXT-2014, expanded by subsequent Fourier-difference synthesis, and all the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically on F2 using the full-matrix least-squares technique with the SHELXL-2018 crystallographic software package [58,59]. Part of the free solvent molecules in 1 and the ones in 2 have been taken into account by SQUEEZE option of the PLATON program [60]. The details of crystal parameters, data collection and refinements for 1 and 2 are listed in Table 1, and the selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table S1. CCDC numbers 2,212,527 (for 1) and 2,212,528 (for 2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for the reported compounds. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.

4. Conclusions

In this study, dipyridyl and multicarboxylate ligands were utilized to react with metal salts to generate 3D MOFs 1 and 2 with pillar-layered structure. The results show that 1 has high stability and presents distinct photoluminescence responses to the varied solvent. Furthermore, MOF 1 exhibits potential for sensing specific amino acid such as Glu and Asp through fluorescence quenching in the aqueous solution. In addition, MOF 2 has n-type semiconductor character and shows photocatalytic capacity for degradation of RhB in the presence of H2O2. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of the metal center in determining the property of the frameworks.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27217551/s1, Table S1: Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for 1 and 2; Table S2: Standard deviation and detection limit calculation of 1 for Glu and Asp in aqueous suspension. Table S3: Fluorescence lifetime of MOF 1 before and after addition of Glu and Asp. Table S4: H2O2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of aqueous RhB by MOF 2 and reported MOFs under visible light. Figure S1: FTIR-ATR spectra of 1 and 2; Figure S2: Coordination modes of NTB3− in 1; Figure S3: The N2 adsorption isotherm of MOF 2 at 77 K; Figure S4: PXRD patterns of 1 and 2; Figure S5: TG curves of 1 and 2; Figure S6: PXRD of 1 after immerging in different solvent; Figure S7: Fluorescence spectra of MOF 1 and its ligands H3NTB and DPA in the solid state; Figure S8: PL spectra of 1 after immerging in varied solvent; Figure S9: Fluorescence quenching effect of 1 by adding amino acid aqueous solution (300 μL, 2.5 mM, λex = 338 nm); Figure S10: PXRD and FTIR-ATR spectra of MOF 1 before and after detecting Glu and Asp; Figure S11: Fluorescence emission spectra of 1 and UV absorption spectra of Glu and Asp in water; Figure S12: Fluorescence lifetime of 1 before and after detecting Glu (a) and Asp (b) in water; Figure S13: The standard curve of MOF 2 for the UV absorption versus concentration of RhB; Figure S14: The degradation efficiency of RhB at varied reaction time; Figure S15: The concentration of RhB in the degradation process at acidic (pH = 2 and 5) and basic (pH = 8 and 10) conditions; Figure S16: The degradation efficiency of RhB by 2 at acidic (pH = 2 and 5) and basic (pH = 8 and 10) conditions. Figure S17: The concentration of RhB at varied photodegradation time with different radical trapping agents; Figure S18: The EPR spectra of photodegradation of RhB by MOF 2 at different reaction time using DMPO as spin-trapping agent; Figure S19: UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (a) and Tauc plot (b) of MOF 2; Figure S20: EIS Nyquist plot of MOF 2.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Z.-Q.H. and S.-M.Z.; data curation, Z.-Q.H. and S.-M.Z.; software, J.-Q.C. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-M.Z. and Z.-Q.H.; writing—review and editing W.-Y.S.; supervision, W.-Y.S.; project administration, W.-Y.S.; funding acquisition, W.-Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22171131).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22171131) for financial support of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lustig, W.P.; Mukherjee, S.; Rudd, N.D.; Desai, A.V.; Li, J.; Ghosh, S.K. Metal–Organic Frameworks: Functional Luminescent and Photonic Materials for Sensing Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3242–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matthew, M.; Hans, P.H.A.; Mine, B.T.; Annika, J. The Global Threat from Plastic Pollution. Science 2021, 373, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, S.M.; Qiu, Z.F.; Xu, Z.H.; Huang, Z.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, W.Y. Fluorescent Zn(II) Frameworks with Multicarboxylate and Pyridyl N-donor Ligands for Sensing Specific Anions and Organic Molecules. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 3572–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Z.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.D.; Kang, Y.S.; Lu, Q.Y.; Azam, M.; Al-Resayes, S.I.; Sun, W.Y. Metal–Organic Frameworks with 1,4-di(1H-imidazol-4-yl)benzene and Varied Carboxylate Ligands for Selectively Sensing Fe(III) Ions and Ketone Molecules. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 13943–13951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huang, Z.Q.; Chen, J.Q.; Zhao, S.M.; Qiu, Z.F.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, W.Y. Supramolecular Assemblies of Zn(II) Complexes with a D–π–A Ligand for Sensing Specific Organic Molecules. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 3612–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, J.; Zhang, X.D.; Xie, X.F.; Guo, F.; Sun, W.Y. Amino Group Dependent Sensing Properties of Metal–Organic Frameworks: Selective Turn-on Fluorescence Detection of Lysine and Arginine. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 37449–37455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, J.; Zhao, D.; Lu, Y.; Sun, W.Y. Photoluminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Application for Sensing Biomolecules. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 22744–22767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, Y.; Wan, M.Y.; Bai, J.P.; Zeng, H.; Lu, W.; Li, D. pH-Modulated Luminescence Switching in a Eu-MOF: Rapid Detection of Acidic Amino Acids. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 11127–11133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. White, T.L.; Monnig, M.A.; Walsh, E.G.; Nitenson, A.Z.; Harris, A.D.; Cohen, R.A.; Porges, E.C.; Woods, A.J.; Lamb, D.G.; Boyd, C.A.; et al. Psychostimulant Drug Effects on Glutamate, Glx, and Creatine in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Subjective Response in Healthy Humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018, 43, 1498–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mohammadi, L.; Khavasi, H.R. Anthracene-Tagged UiO-67-MOF as Highly Selective Aqueous Sensor for Nanoscale Detection of Arginine Amino Acid. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 13091–13097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, Q.; Liu, J.L.; Zheng, Q.M.; Chang, J.F.; Wu, L.Z.; Zhang, M.D.; Qin, L. The Ligand Effect Resulted in Different Fluorescence Responses of Two Similar Zinc-based MOFs to High-valence Metal Ions and Amino Acids. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2021, 321, 111130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiu, Z.F.; Zhao, S.M.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.L.; Sun, W.Y. Crystal Structures and Luminescent Probe Behaviors of Three-Dimensional Zn(II) Frameworks with Multicarboxylate and Tetradentate Imidazole-Containing Ligands. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 5306–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, Z.P.; Li, D.; Xu, L.; Jiang, Y.F.; Lin, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J. Cationic Metal–Organic Frameworks Constructed from a Trigonal Imidazole-containing Ligand for the Removal of Cr2O72− in Water. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 12994–1300014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, J.; Dao, X.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhang, X.D.; Sun, W.Y. Sensing Properties of NH2-MIL-101 Series for Specific Amino Acids via Turn-On Fluorescence. Molecules 2021, 26, 5336. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng, X.M.; Dao, X.Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Zhao, J.; Sun, W.Y. Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Activity over NH2-MIL-125(Ti) by Facet Regulation. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, F. Coupling Reaction between CO2 and Cyclohexene Oxide: Selective Control from Cyclic Carbonate to Polycarbonate by Ligand Design of Salen/Salalen Titanium Complexes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 3964–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andrea, K.A.; Kerton, F.M. Triarylborane-Catalyzed Formation of Cyclic Organic Carbonates and Polycarbonates. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1799–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Li, Z.; Garcia, H. Catalysis and Photocatalysis by Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 8134–8172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, W.Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K.; Hu, W.X.; Cheng, Z.Z.; Chen, H.P.; Feng, X.; Peng, T.; Kou, Z.K. Monodispersed Ruthenium Nanoparticles Interfacially Bonded with Defective Nitrogen-and-Phosphorus-Doped Carbon Nanosheets Enable pH-Universal Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Appl. Catal. B. 2022, 306, 121095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.; Li, W.Q.; Feng, X.; Zhu, L.; Fang, Q.Z.; Li, S.; Wang, L.Y.; Li, Z.J.; Kou, Z.K. A Chainmail Effect of Ultrathin N-Doped Carbon Shell on Ni2P Nanorod Arrays for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 607, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rojas, S.; Horcajada, P. Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Removal of Emerging Organic Contaminants in Water. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8378–8415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Huang, L.; Yu, S.; Chen, L.; Song, G.; Qiu, M.; Wang, X. Applications of Water-Stable Metal-Organic Frameworks in the Removal of Water Pollutants: A Review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gautam, S.; Agrawal, H.; Thakur, M.; Akbari, A.; Sharda, H.; Kaur, R.; Amini, M. Metal Oxides and Metal-Organic Frameworks for the Photocatalytic Degradation: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, A.; Singh, A.K.; Liu, J.Q.; Kumar, A. Syntheses, Design Strategies, and Photocatalytic Charge Dynamics of Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): A Catalyzed Photo-Degradation Approach Towards Organic Dyes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 3946–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.; Rao, C.Y.; Lu, L.; Zhang, S.L.; Muddassir, M.; Liu, J.Q. Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Violet Using Two New 3D MOFs Directed by Different Carboxylate Spacers. CrystEngComm 2021, 23, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, X.Y.; Li, Y.Y.; Li, D.Q.C.; Liao, D.H.; Qin, T.R.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, A.; Liu, J.Q. A New 3D 8-Connected Cd(II) MOF as a Potent Photocatalyst for Oxytetracycline Antibiotic Degradation. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 6933–6943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, Z.Q.; Tang, S.F.; Fu, W.J.; Ji, B.M.; Wang, L.Y. Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols and the Synthesis of Benzoxazoles Catalyzed by a Cuprocupric Coordination Polymer (Cu+-CP) Assisted by TEMPO. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 2088–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yao, L.; Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, M.; Hu, B.; Wang, X. Bismuth Oxychloride-Based Materials for the Removal of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 128576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alesso, M.; Bondioli, G.; Talío, M.C.; Luconi, M.O.; Fernández, L.P. Micelles Mediated Separation Fluorimetric Methodology for Rhodamine B Determination in Condiments, Snacks and Candies. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qi, P.; Lin, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Meng, W.; Hong, H.; Zhang, X. Development of a Rapid, Simple and Sensitive HPLC-FLD Method for Determination of Rhodamine B in Chili-Containing Products. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ai, L.H.; Zhang, C.H.; Li, L.L.; Jiang, J. Iron Terephthalate Metal–Organic Framework: Revealing the Effective Activation of Hydrogen Peroxide for the Degradation of Organic Dye under Visible Light Irradiation. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 148, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, X.G.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Qiu, S.; Su, X.; Wang, Y.B.; Sun, X.Q. Versatile Tailoring of NH2-Containing Metal–Organic Frameworks with Paddle-Wheel Units. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 17727–17733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, X.J.; Zheng, H.G. The Difference in the CO2 Adsorption Capacities of Different Functionalized Pillar-Layered Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 9310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, K.; Wu, C.D. Transformation of Metal-Organic Frameworks into Stable Organic Frameworks with Inherited Skeletons and Catalytic Properties. Angew. Chem. 2019, 58, 8119–8123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, D.; Liu, X.H.; Zhu, C.D.; Kang, Y.S.; Wang, P.; Shi, Z.Z.; Lu, Y.; Sun, W.Y. Efficient and Reusable Metal–Organic Framework Catalysts for Carboxylative Cyclization of Propargylamines with Carbon Dioxide. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 4598–4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Z.Q.; Xu, Z.H.; Liu, X.H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, Z.Q.; Sun, W.Y. A Novel Copper Framework with Amino Tridentate N-donor Ligand as Heterogeneous Catalyst for Ring Opening of Epoxides. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.D.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, K.; Guo, J.H.; Wang, P.; Wu, H.; Sun, W.Y. Cucurbit[6]uril-Based Supramolecular Assemblies Incorporating Metal Complexes with Multiaromatic Ligands as Structure-Directing Agent for Detection of Aromatic Amines and Nitroaromatic Compounds. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 282, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Azadbakht, R.; Koolivand, M.; Khanabadi, J. A New Fluorescence Chemosensor for Zn2+ with a Remarkable Red Shift in Emission Spectra. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 4688–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, S.Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Cheng, X.M.; Ma, J.; Sun, W.Y. Effect of the Defect Modulator and Ligand Length of Metal–Organic Frameworks on Carbon Dioxide Photoreduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 61578–61586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuan, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Hao, J. Stimuli-Responsive Fluorescent Nanoswitches: Solvent-Induced Emission Enhancement of Copper Nanoclusters. Chemistry 2020, 26, 3545–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cai, Y.; Hua, Y.; Yin, M.; Liu, H.; Li, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, H. Fabrication of Test Strips with Gold-Silver Nanospheres and Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Fluorimetric Method for Sensing Trace Cysteine in Hela Cells. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 302, 127198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, D.; Yan, Z.H.; Liu, M.J.; Xie, H.Y.; Yuan, S.A.; Lu, H.F.; Feng, S.Y.; Sun, D.F. Three- and Eight-Fold Interpenetrated ThSi2 Metal–Organic Frameworks Fine-Tuned by the Length of Ligand. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 2902–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zu, F.; Yan, F.; Bai, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, X. The Quenching of the Fluorescence of Carbon Dots: A Review on Mechanisms and Applications. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lops, C.; Ancona, A.; Cesare, K.; Di Dumontel, B.; Garino, N.; Canavese, G.; Hernandez, S.; Cauda, V. Sonophotocatalytic Degradation Mechanisms of Rhodamine B Dye via Radicals Generation by Micro- and Nano-Particles of ZnO. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 243, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xia, Q.; Yu, X.; Zhao, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Guo, Z.; Xing, H. Syntheses of Novel Lanthanide Metal–Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Dye Degradation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 4189–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tran, T.K.N.; Ho, H.L.; Nguyen, H.V.; Tran, B.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Bui, P.Q.T.; Bach, L.G. Photocatalytic Degradation of Rhodamine B in Aqueous Phase by Bimetallic Metal-Organic Framework M/Fe-MOF (M = Co, Cu, and Mg). Open Chem. 2022, 20, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sarkar, A.; Adhikary, A.; Mandal, A.; Chakraborty, T.; Das, D. Zn-BTC MOF as an Adsorbent for Iodine Uptake and Organic Dye Degradation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 7833–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, H.; Xia, Q.; Xing, H.; Chen, D.; Wang, H. Construction of Pillared-Layer MOF as Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts for Aqueous Cr(VI) Reduction and Dye Degradation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4449–4456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Lu, R.; Yu, A. Interaction between Triethanolamine and Singlet or Triplet Excited State of Xanthene Dyes in Aqueous Solution. Spectrochim. Acta. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 184, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Drtinova, B.; Pospisil, M.; Cuba, V. Products of Radiation Removal of Lead from Aqueous Solutions. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010, 68, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Toshifumi, N.; Setsuko, T.; Toshiki, M.; Ikuo, S.; Shu, F.; Zeji, D.; Shoshi, K. Levels of Active Oxygen Species Are Controlled by Ascorbic Acid and Anthocyanin in Arabidopsis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2992–2999. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhao, K.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Lin, S.; Li, H.; Gao, X. Surface Oxygen Vacancy Modified Bi2MoO6/MIL-88B(Fe) Heterostructure with Enhanced Spatial Charge Separation at the Bulk & Interface. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 268, 118740. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, C.; Meng, L.H.; Chu, H.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Wang, T.Y.; Ma, Y.H.; Wang, C.C. Ultrafast degradation of emerging organic pollutants via activation of peroxymonosulfate over Fe3C/Fe@N-C-x: Singlet oxygen evolution and electron-transfer mechanisms. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 321, 122034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Watts, R.J.; Teel, A.L. Hydroxyl Radical and Non-Hydroxyl Radical Pathways for Trichloroethylene and Perchloroethylene Degradation in Catalyzed H2O2 Propagation Systems. Water Res. 2019, 159, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Bao, Z.; Zhao, J.C.-G.; Chen, B. Highly Interpenetrat-ed Robust Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework for Gas Separation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 6132–6137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. SAINT. Program for Data Extraction and Reduction; Bruker AXS, Inc: Madison, WI, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS, Program for Empirical Adsorption Correction of Area Detector Data; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-2014, Program for the Crystal Structure Solution; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXL-2018, Program for the Crystal Structure Refinement; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sluis, P.V.D.; Spek, A.L. BYPASS: An Effective Method for the Refinement of Crystal Structures Containing Disordered Solvent Regions. Acta Cryst. 1990, 46, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 07551 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Coordination environment of Cd(II) in 1 with 50% thermal ellipsoidal ratio, and the hydrogen atoms and lattice molecules are omitted. (b) 2D network in 1. (c) 3D pillar-layered framework viewed along c-axis. (d) The two-fold interpenetration and topology of 1.
Figure 1. (a) Coordination environment of Cd(II) in 1 with 50% thermal ellipsoidal ratio, and the hydrogen atoms and lattice molecules are omitted. (b) 2D network in 1. (c) 3D pillar-layered framework viewed along c-axis. (d) The two-fold interpenetration and topology of 1.
Molecules 27 07551 g001
Molecules 27 07551 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The coordination environment of Cu(II) in 2 with 50% thermal ellipsoidal ratio, and the hydrogen atoms are omitted. (b) Cu-OBA2− 2D network in 2. (c) 3D pillar-layered structure of 2 viewed along c-axis. (d) Topology of 2.
Figure 2. (a) The coordination environment of Cu(II) in 2 with 50% thermal ellipsoidal ratio, and the hydrogen atoms are omitted. (b) Cu-OBA2− 2D network in 2. (c) 3D pillar-layered structure of 2 viewed along c-axis. (d) Topology of 2.
Molecules 27 07551 g002
Molecules 27 07551 g003 550
Figure 3. Fluorescence titration of 1 with gradual addition of Glu (a) and Asp (c). The S-V plot of I0/I − 1 vs. the concentration of Glu (b) and Asp (d). Inset: enlarged view of S-V plot in the low concentration range and the calculated quenching constant Ksv.
Figure 3. Fluorescence titration of 1 with gradual addition of Glu (a) and Asp (c). The S-V plot of I0/I − 1 vs. the concentration of Glu (b) and Asp (d). Inset: enlarged view of S-V plot in the low concentration range and the calculated quenching constant Ksv.
Molecules 27 07551 g003
Molecules 27 07551 g004 550
Figure 4. The concentration of RhB (a) and pseudo-first order kinetic curves (b) with varied reaction time.
Figure 4. The concentration of RhB (a) and pseudo-first order kinetic curves (b) with varied reaction time.
Molecules 27 07551 g004
Molecules 27 07551 g005 550
Figure 5. The pseudo-first order kinetic curves at varied photodegradation time with different radical trapping agents.
Figure 5. The pseudo-first order kinetic curves at varied photodegradation time with different radical trapping agents.
Molecules 27 07551 g005
Molecules 27 07551 g006 550
Figure 6. Mott Schottky plot of MOF 2 under varied frequencies.
Figure 6. Mott Schottky plot of MOF 2 under varied frequencies.
Molecules 27 07551 g006
Molecules 27 07551 g007 550
Figure 7. Possible mechanism of photodegradation of RhB by MOF 2 and H2O2.
Figure 7. Possible mechanism of photodegradation of RhB by MOF 2 and H2O2.
Molecules 27 07551 g007
Table
Table 1. Crystal data and refinement results for 1 and 2.
Table 1. Crystal data and refinement results for 1 and 2.
Compound12
FormulaC152H142N18O34Cd6C51.5H48.5N5.5O13.5Cu2
Formula weight3439.231087.17
Crystal systemmonoclinicorthorhombic
Space groupP21/cPbcn
a (Å)24.6399(11)28.208(3)
b (Å)22.0378(13)23.453(2)
c (Å)28.1864(13)15.7977(16)
β (°)90.107(2)90
V (Å3)15,305.4(13)10,451.2(18)
Z42
Dcalc (g·cm−3)1.4931.127
μ (mm−1)0.8980.863
F (000)6960.03616.0
Reflections collected120,40178,324
Unique reflections27,9879561
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0491.016
R1a, wR2b [I > 2σ(I)]0.0517/0.13510.1066/0.2760
R1, wR2 [all data]0.0783/0.16130.1435/0.3023
aR1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|. b wR2 = |Σw(|Fo|2 − |Fc|2)|/Σ|w(Fo)2|1/2, where w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (aP)2 + bP]. P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Z.-Q.; Zhao, S.-M.; Chen, J.-Q.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, W.-Y. Pillar-Layered Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Specific Amino Acid and Photocatalyzing Rhodamine B Degradation. Molecules 2022, 27, 7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217551

AMA Style

Huang Z-Q, Zhao S-M, Chen J-Q, Zhao Y, Sun W-Y. Pillar-Layered Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Specific Amino Acid and Photocatalyzing Rhodamine B Degradation. Molecules. 2022; 27(21):7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Zi-Qing, Shu-Man Zhao, Jia-Qi Chen, Yue Zhao, and Wei-Yin Sun. 2022. "Pillar-Layered Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Specific Amino Acid and Photocatalyzing Rhodamine B Degradation" Molecules 27, no. 21: 7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217551

APA Style

Huang, Z. -Q., Zhao, S. -M., Chen, J. -Q., Zhao, Y., & Sun, W. -Y. (2022). Pillar-Layered Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensing Specific Amino Acid and Photocatalyzing Rhodamine B Degradation. Molecules, 27(21), 7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217551

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop