Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Catalytic Alkyne Transformation via Copper Carbene Intermediates
Previous Article in Journal
Predictive Multi Experiment Approach for the Determination of Conjugated Phenolic Compounds in Vegetal Matrices by Means of LC-MS/MS
Previous Article in Special Issue
HDAC Inhibitors: Innovative Strategies for Their Design and Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules27103091
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Screening of Carbonic Anhydrase, Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase, and α-Glycosidase Enzyme Inhibition Effects and Antioxidant Activity of Coumestrol

by
Lokman Durmaz
1,
Adem Erturk
2,
Mehmet Akyüz
3,
Leyla Polat Kose
4,
Eda Mehtap Uc
2,
Zeynebe Bingol
2,5,
Ruya Saglamtas
6,
Saleh Alwasel
7 and
İlhami Gulcin
2,*
1
Department of Medical Services and Technology, Cayirli Vocational School, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan 24500, Turkey
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Arts, Kilis 7 Aralık University, Kilis 79000, Turkey
4
Department of Pharmacy Services, Vocational School, Beykent University, Istanbul 34500, Turkey
5
Vocational School of Health Services, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Turkey
6
Department of Medical Services and Technology, Vocational School of Health Services, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri 04100, Turkey
7
Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(10), 3091; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103091
Submission received: 3 April 2022 / Revised: 6 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metalloenzyme Inhibitors and Activators II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Coumestrol (3,9-dihydroxy-6-benzofuran [3,2-c] chromenone) as a phytoestrogen and polyphenolic compound is a member of the Coumestans family and is quite common in plants. In this study, antiglaucoma, antidiabetic, anticholinergic, and antioxidant effects of Coumestrol were evaluated and compared with standards. To determine the antioxidant activity of coumestrol, several methods—namely N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride radical (DMPD•+)-scavenging activity, 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonate) radical (ABTS•+)-scavenging activity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•)-scavenging activity, potassium ferric cyanide reduction ability, and cupric ion (Cu2+)-reducing activity—were performed. Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), Trolox, α-Tocopherol, and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were used as the reference antioxidants for comparison. Coumestrol scavenged the DPPH radical with an IC50 value of 25.95 μg/mL (r2: 0.9005) while BHA, BHT, Trolox, and α-Tocopherol demonstrated IC50 values of 10.10, 25.95, 7.059, and 11.31 μg/mL, respectively. When these results evaluated, Coumestrol had similar DPPH•-scavenging effect to BHT and lower better than Trolox, BHA and α-tocopherol. In addition, the inhibition effects of Coumestrol were tested against the metabolic enzymes acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), carbonic anhydrase II (CA II), and α-glycosidase, which are associated with some global diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), glaucoma, and diabetes. Coumestrol exhibited Ki values of 10.25 ± 1.94, 5.99 ± 1.79, 25.41 ± 1.10, and 30.56 ± 3.36 nM towards these enzymes, respectively.

1. Introduction

Antioxidants are molecules that can slow or prevent damage to cells by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, which are unstable molecules the body produces in response to environmental and other stresses [1]. They can protect the metabolism from the hazardous effects of ROS and oxidative stresses [2,3]. Also, they have positive effects in preventing chronic disorders including cancer, Parkinson’s disease (PD), cataracts, type 2-diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer’s diseases (AD) [4]. Excessive levels of free radicals and ROS damage cellular proteins, membrane lipids, and nucleic acids and eventually cause cell death. In addition, antioxidants can terminate radical chain reactions and effectively neutralize free radicals that damage cellular biomolecules [5,6]. In terms of content, natural fruits, vegetables, and foods have a common range of antioxidants. In this context, antioxidants from natural sources such as vegetables, plants, and fruits are known to easily remove ROS or free radicals. Therefore, as an alternative to synthetic antioxidants with harmful effects, naturally occurring antioxidants of reliable plant origin are preferred and desired [7,8].
Antioxidants have been shown to play a crucial role in delaying or avoiding T2DM and AD [9]. One of the main goals in the treatment of T2DM is to provide inhibition studies of α-glycosidase, which is one of the most important digestive enzymes and catalyzes the breakdown of dietary polysaccharides [10]. Miglitol, 1-deoxynojirimycin, voglibose, and acarbose are the most used α-glycosidase inhibitors (Figure 1C). α-Glycosidase inhibitors (AGIs) delay the uptake of monosaccharides from the small intestine, resulting in a reduction in postprandial plasma glucose level. For this reason, AGIs can be used for treatment of T2DM and obesity [11]. Scientific and epidemiological studies have clearly demonstrated that there is a link between AD and T2DM. In addition, loss of cholinergic conduction is known as a main cause of AD [12]. Therefore, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), which increase cholinergic transmission, are used in the treatment of AD. Some cholinergic drugs such as tacrine, which is frequently used in the palliative treatment of AD, are used for this purpose and have a serious hepatotoxic effect [13]. Patients with neurodegenerative diseases, which are treated with the usual clinical inhibitors, present undesirable side effects including gastrointestinal abnormalities such as hepatotoxicity, nausea, and diarrhea. Tacrine, rivastigmine, galanthamine, donepezil, and corydaline are the most commonly used AChE and BChE inhibitors (Figure 1B). Of these, tacrine, one of the most commonly used clinical drugs, has some side effects including nausea, vomiting, agitation, weight loss, stomach upset, diarrhea, skin rash, and chills [14]. Thus, there is a growing demand for the development and use of novel AGIs and ChEIs with known natural antioxidant properties [15]. It has been previously reported that many natural phenolics possess α-glycosidase inhibition profiles and anti-AD effects. These results show that it is inevitable to use compounds and products obtained from natural sources, which are accepted as an important approach for the treatment of AD and T2DM [16].
Phenolic compounds give color to plants and play a fundamental role in the biochemical properties of plant species [17]. Plants protect themselves against many negative and external effects such as stress with phenolics, which possess biological activity including antioxidant ability [18]. Because of these features, phenolic compounds are also significant for human health. They are commonly used to prevent hazardous effects of ROS on free radicals to biomolecules [19]. Phenolics, as dietary antioxidant ingredients, have great importance in increasing the natural resistance of the human body against oxidative damage [20]. Because of their potent antioxidant abilities, they can effectively terminate lipid peroxidation and autoxidation of food products [21]. Phenolic compounds have some biological effects including free radical removing, quenching of singlet oxygen, reduction, and metal binding properties [22,23]. Many reports have shown the advantages of phenolics including antioxidant, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory effects [24].
In order to survive, plants produce secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds with many biological activities, especially antioxidant and antibiotic effects [25,26]. Coumestrol, as a phytoestrogen and cancer chemoprevention agent, is a polyphenol with potentially many pharmacological applications. These metabolites, including isoflavones, have a large spectrum of positive effects on plants. As can be seen from Figure 2, it is derived from the soybean isoflavone daidzein, via dihydrodaidzein and 2′-hydroxydaidzein, through two biosynthetic pathways. Its chemical structure is characterized by the presence of a fused ring system comprising benzofuran and coumarin, and two hydroxyl group moieties responsible for its biological activities [27]. Coumestrol is an isoflavone and plays a key role in nodulation through communication. It is used with rhizobia and as a phytoestrogen for hormone replacement therapy in humans [28]. Coumestrol attracts a lot of attention due to its pharmacological properties in breast cancer for estrogen-like abilities [27].
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) belong to the carboxylesterase enzyme class [29]. Both cholinergic enzymes hydrolyze the neurotransmitters acetylcholine (ACh) and butyrylcholine (BCh) to choline and acetate/butyrate, respectively. Also, AChE hydrolyzes several species of ChEs all over the human body, especially in blood serum, the pancreas, the liver, and the central nervous system (CNS) [30]. It is found in erythrocyte membranes, nerves, muscles, the CNS, motor and sensory fibers, peripheral tissues, and cholinergic and non-cholinergic fibers. BChE is mainly associated with endothelial and glial cells in brain cells [31]. AChE inhibitors increase both the effect and duration of the neurotransmitter ACh by preventing the cholinesterase enzyme from breaking down ACh [32]. However, the physiological role of BChE is not fully known. Thus, selective inhibitors of both cholinergic enzymes have great importance in the design of drugs against common neurodegenerative disease. In particular, it is known that they play an important role in AD treatment [33].
Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are Zn2+-containing metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide (CO2) to proton and bicarbonate (HCO3−) [34]. Acetazolamide, methazolamide, ethoxzolamide, dichlorphenamide, dorzolamide, and brinzolamide are commonly used CA isoenzyme inhibitors (Figure 1A). Topical CA inhibitors (CAIs) have been used for the medical treatment of glaucoma since 1995, when dorzolamide was approved [35]. In 2000, brinzolamide, a second CAI, became available across most of Europe. Glaucoma is known to be the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of multifactorial optic neuropathies that cause irreversible blindness and visual impairment. It is also estimated that the number of glaucoma patients worldwide will rise to 112 million by 2040 [36]. Glaucoma is an ophthalmologic disorder characterized by high intraocular pressure (IOP) that eventually causes irreversible peripheral vision loss and eventually blindness [37,38,39,40]. Clinically, there are many methods for treatment of glaucoma such as laser, surgery, and pharmacological therapies. Administration of CA II inhibitors, a CA isoenzyme present in ciliary epithelial cells located in the ciliary body, is known to reduce aqueous humor secretion and lower IOP. CA II inhibitors, including acetazolamide, ethoxzolamide, methazolamide, and dichlorphenamide, can be used as pressure-lowering systemic drugs in the treatment of glaucoma [41]. However, these inhibitors are known to cause undesirable side effects such as fatigue, paresthesia, or increased diuresis as they inhibit CA isoforms found in many tissues and organs outside the eye [42]. Therefore, in order to avoid the above-mentioned side effects of CA inhibitors, it is better for the inhibitor to have topical activity.
In this context, our study investigated the antiradical and antioxidant properties of Coumestrol at different concentrations with a range of antioxidant assays, examining Fe3+-reducing activity; TPTZ-Fe3+ reduction ability; Cu2+-reducing activity; and ABTS•+-, DMPD•+-, and DPPH•-scavenging activities. Another aim of this study was to explore the possible inhibition effects of Coumestrol toward α-glycosidase, AChE and BChE enzymes associated with AD and T2DM, which are known as common global diseases.

2. Results

There are many antioxidant methods and modifications of them for the evaluation of antioxidant activities of pure compounds [43]. We selected several of the most prominent of these methods, including DMPD•+-scavenging activity, ABTS•+-scavenging activity, DPPH•-scavenging activity, potassium ferric cyanide reduction ability, and cupric ion (Cu2+)-reducing activity. In one of the studies carried out in this context, the addition of Fe3+ to the reduced product by the addition of Coumestrol led to the formation of a Fe4[Fe(CN)6] complex, with absorbance at 700 nm [44]. In the presence of reducing agents, Fe[(CN)6]3+ was reduced to Fe[(CN)6]2+ [45]. Also, as given in Table 1 and Figure 3A, Coumestrol exhibited effective Fe3+-reducing activity, which was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). The Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol, Trolox, α-Tocopherol, BHT, and BHA increased depending on increased Coumestrol concentrations. The Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of the standards was as follows: BHA (λ700: 2.347 ± 0.046, r2: 0.9086) > Trolox (λ700: 2.119 ± 0.001, r2: 0.9586) > α-Tocopherol (λ700: 0.957 ± 0.018, r2: 0.9863) ≥ BHT (λ700: 0.952 ± 0.023, r2: 0.9154) ≥ Coumestrol (λ700: 0.739 ± 0.014, r2: 0.9478), at 30 μg/mL. The results showed that the Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol was close to BHT and α-Tocopherol, but lower than BHA and Trolox. Searching the literature on this subject, it was observed that the absorbance values for Fe3+-reducing activity have been calculated as 0.278 (r2: 0.9567) for usnic acid [3], 2.769 for caffeic acid (r2: 0.9945) [46], 0.432 (r2: 0.9981) for uric acid [47], 2.428 (r2: 0.9474) for tannic acid [48], and 2.509 (r2: 0.9906) for caffeic acid phenethyl ester [49], at similar concentrations.
The cupric ion (Cu2+)-reducing activity at the same concentration (30 μg/mL) of Coumestrol and the standards are given in Table 1 and Figure 3B. A positive correlation was observed between the Cu2+-reducing activity and the different concentrations of the Coumestrol. It was found that the Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol increased depending on increased concentrations (10–30 μg/mL). The Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of the standards at 30 μg/mL was found as follows: BHA (λ450: 2.216 ± 0.059, r2: 0.9928) > BHT (λ450: 2.044 ± 0.041, r2: 0.9937) > Trolox (λ450: 1.548 ± 0.024, r2: 0.9305) > α-Tocopherol (λ450: 0.816 ± 0.041, r2: 0.9897) ≥ Coumestrol (λ450: 0.780 ± 0.033, r2: 0.9981). The results showed that the Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol was lower than standard antioxidants of Trolox, BHA, BHT, and close to α-Tocopherol. Additionally, for natural phenolic compounds as stated in the previous literature, the absorbance values for Cu2+-reducing activity are 0.277 (r2: 0.9836) for usnic acid [3], 0.762 for eugenol (r2: 0.9957) [50], 1.085 (r2: 0.8403) for resveratrol [51], 0.750 (r2: 0.9550) for taxifolin [52], and 1.314 (r2: 0.9682) for olivetol [53], at similar concentrations.
Radical-scavenging assays are often used for screening the antioxidant properties of pure or novel synthesized compounds. For this purpose, the most commonly and widely used radical scavenging method is the DPPH radical-scavenging assay. In the DPPH free radical-scavenging assay, the IC50 value for Coumestrol was calculated to be 25.95 μg/mL (r2: 0.9005) (Table 2 and Figure 4A). In contrast, the IC50 values were found to be 7.059 μg/mL for Trolox (r2: 0.9614), 10.10 μg/mL for BHA (r2: 0.9015), 11.31 μg/mL for α-Tocopherol (r2: 0.9642), and 25.95 μg/mL for BHT (r2: 0.9221). The results showed that Coumestrol had effective DPPH radical-scavenging activity when compared to positive controls of α-Tocopherol and BHT, close to Trolox and BHA. In particular, it was observed that the hydroxyl groups in the both aromatic rings had a significant impact on radical-scavenging activity [27]. Compared with other studies in the literature, these results showed that Coumestrol had a much higher level of DPPH free radical-scavenging activity. The DPPH radical-scavenging activities of a range of phenolic antioxidants can be used to compare the free radical-scavenging activity of Coumestrol: reported IC50 values are 49.50 μg/mL for usnic acid [3], 3.30 μg/mL for CAPE [46], 16.06 μg/mL for eugenol [50], 6.96 μg/mL for resveratrol [51], 77.00 μg/mL for taxifolin [52], 17.77 μg/mL for olivetol [53], 20.0 mg/mL for silymarin [54], 30.6 μg/mL for L-Adrenaline [55], and 34.9 μg/mL for curcumin, as the first isolated phenolic compounds from a herbal source [56].
In addition, Coumestrol effectively inhibited the cholinergic enzymes of AChE and BChE, which are target cholinergic enzymes for improving AD symptoms, with Ki values of 21.43 ± 3.70 and 21.65 ± 2.23 nM, respectively (Table 3, Figure 5A,B). The selectivity index (Ki for AChE/Ki BChE) for both cholinergic enzymes was found to be 0.989. In this case, Coumestrol’s affinities for the two cholinergic enzymes are almost the same. Also, Tacrine had Ki values of 2.43 ± 0.92 nM for AChE (Figure 5A) and 5.99 ± 1.79 nM for BChE (Figure 5B). AD is the most common form of dementia, which primarily affects people later in life. AChE is the primary cholinesterase, mainly in chemical synapses and neuromuscular junctions [57]. Furthermore, examining the relevant literature, the Ki values for AChE and inhibition for a range of natural compounds were calculated as 3.39 and 1.43 nM for usnic acid [3], 0.518 and 0.322 nM for CAPE [58], 5.13 μg/mL for olivetol [53], and 16.70 μg/mL for taxifolin [59], which prevents accumulation of reactive oxygen species and free radicals.
T2DM is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia and insufficient secretion or action of endogenous insulin. This metabolic disease is associated with high blood sugar levels. Recently, research has focused on the inhibition of α-glycosidase to control carbohydrate breakdown [60,61]. Coumestrol had a Ki of 10.86 ± 0.75 nM against α-glycosidase (Table 3 and Figure 5C). The results obviously show that Coumestrol displays effective α-glycosidase inhibition when compared to acarbose (IC50: 22,800 nM) as a standard α-glycosidase inhibitor and antidiabetic drug of T2DM [62].
Phenolic compounds inhibit CA isozymes due to the presence of some functional groups in their scaffold that coordinate to the zinc ions in its active-side cavity. With regard to the profiling assay against dominant and cytosolic hCA II isoenzyme, Coumestrol had a Ki value of 23.80 ± 2.17 nM (Table 3 and Figure 5D). For comparison, AZA, which is used as a clinical CA II inhibitor, exhibited a Ki value of 4.41 ± 0.35 nM towards hCA II isoform. Physiologically dominant and cytosolic hCA II is found almost everywhere in cells and is associated with several diseases such as glaucoma, epilepsy, and oedema [63].

3. Discussion

Interest in antioxidants has increased due to their protective properties in pharmaceutical and food products against oxidative deterioration and oxidative stress-associated processes [64]. The antioxidant ability of a compound may form through different mechanisms. For example, in an oxidation process accelerated by transition metal ions, the reducing ability is not very important in terms of antioxidant properties. In such a case, even if the antioxidant only has metal binding ability, it can slow down or completely stop oxidation in such a system [65]. Antioxidants can exhibit activity through different mechanisms by chelating metal ions, breaking down peroxides, abstracting hydrogen, and eliminating reactive oxygen species. Additionally, the electron-withdrawing capacity reflects the reducing power, which is the most important property of an antioxidant [66]. Reducing properties of an antioxidant have stabilizing properties in redox reactions and can be determined by several methods. In a recent study, oxygen radical absorbance capacity, DPPH radical-removing ability, and fluorescence quenching ability of Coumestrol were evaluated [27]. In the present study, the antioxidant activity of Coumestrol was determined by several distinct methods: ABTS•+-scavenging, DPPH•-scavenging, DMPD•+-scavenging, potassium ferric cyanide reduction, and cupric ions (Cu2+)-reducing activities.
Coumestrol appears to be a promising antioxidant molecule due to both hydroxyl groups being attached to aromatic rings in its structure. Due to the aforementioned properties, this phenolic can exhibit antioxidant, reducing, and antiradical properties. The -OH groups in the chemical structure of Coumestrol are extremely effective in its antioxidant ability. Easier donation of phenolic hydrogen also increases its radical-scavenging and chain-breaking activities. In general, antioxidative efficiency and free radical-scavenging properties of a molecule enhance with an increase in the number of its hydroxyl (-OH) groups [67]. Coumestrol, with its unsubstituted -OH groups, demonstrated antioxidant activity.
In biological, drug, and food applications, the radical-scavenging abilities of antioxidants has great importance in terms of preventing damage caused by free radicals and ROS to the organism and products [68]. In addition, the used chromophore ABTS•+-, DPPH•- and DMPD•+-scavenging assays are fast, simple, selective, inexpensive, and reproducible. Thus, the examination of these radical-scavenging activities is quite a common method for determining the antioxidant activities of pure substances. The high detection sensitivity of purple DPPH•, pink DMPD•+, and green-blue ABTS•+ radicals makes them very easy to use [66]. In these methods, hydrogen atom of phenolic -OH groups can be easily abstracted by oxygen-centered radicals; the unsaturated region in the lipid chain can also react with Coumestrol, which may act as a chain-breaking radical scavenger. Coumestrol includes two phenolic rings, both of which contain a hydroxyl group (-OH) and a methoxy group (-OCH3) in the ortho-position [69]. The most favorable structural features of antioxidant potential of phenolics are the presence of H-donating substituents and the delocalization capabilities of the free electron, which are necessary for stability. Also, the most active form of an antioxidant molecule is the presence of more than one active -OH group in the ortho-position, which plays a crucial role in SAR in the molecule. It is known that -OH groups in the ortho-position are more active due to their ability to form intramolecular H-bonds [70]. In addition, subordinate groups are more affected by neighboring ortho- and para-positions, respectively. In both positions, bonded groups attract or donate more electrons depending on their electron-withdrawing (such as nitro groups) or electron-accepting (such as methoxy groups) properties [71]. Also, it has been shown that the para-position is more effective than the meta-position in a compound. H atoms that are not included in intramolecular H bonds are then abstracted by free radicals, and in this case, the molecule acquires a more stable structure [72]. It is known that the antioxidant capabilities of phenolics that cause biological activity are related to the position and number of -OH groups in the molecule. Due to these properties, polymeric polyphenols have more antioxidant effects than simple monomeric units [73]. According to the mechanism proposed between Coumestrol and DPPH given in Figure 6, the structure of Coumestrol leads to interference in the DPPH free radicals. Also, it has been reported that the existence of two hydroxyl groups in its chemical structure, with orientation analogous to estradiol, is responsible for its antioxidant capacity and estrogenic activity [27].
Although there is not much information in the literature about the DPPH radical-scavenging properties of Coumestrol [27], there is some information about Coumestrol derivatives [74,75,76]. The antioxidant ability of compounds including a catechol moiety in the Coumestan scaffold has been evaluated, showing that compounds such as wedelolactone could remove DPPH radicals with high influence [77]. The data presented in this study demonstrate that Coumestrol had an effective DPPH radical-scavenging ability. After the interaction of Coumestrol and DPPH•, radicals disappear after accepting an electron or hydrogen from Coumestrol to become DPPH-H. To our knowledge, the DPPH• scavenging mechanism of the Coumestrol compound has not been reported yet. However, the best information may be that it stabilizes the radicals formed on the phenolic groups in the Coumestrol based on its resonance structure stability. Moreover, if a Coumestrol molecule scavenges two DPPH• in this way, its structure can change from the indicated radical forms to the neutral form by going to a diketonic structure.
A ABTS•+-scavenging assay measured the ability of pure compounds to decrease the color, reacting directly with the ABTS radical [78]. The results demonstrated that Coumestrol had higher ABTS•+-scavenging ability; however, this activity was lower than that of positive controls. ABTS•+-scavenging ability and DPPH• scavenging ability are also used extensively for the determination of radical removal in slurries, beverages, extracts, and pure compounds [79]. When compared with other pure and natural compounds, the IC50 value was calculated as 10.41 μg/mL for usnic acid [3], 9.80 μg/mL for CAPE [49], 7.84 μg/mL for eugenol [50], 6.96 μg/mL for resveratrol [51], 0.83 μg/mL for taxifolin [52], 1.94 μg/mL for olivetol [53], 8.62 mg/mL for silymarin [54], 6.93 μg/mL for L-Adrenaline [55], and 18.07 μg/mL for curcumin [56]. These compounds exhibited effective ABTS radical scavenging.
In this study, DMPD radicals were generated in situ by oxidation with ferric chloride. In the test samples, antioxidant molecules easily scavenged DMPD radicals. The IC50 values for DMPD•+ removal activity was more effective for other studies in the literature. For example, IC50 values were found to be 33.00 μg/mL for usnic acid [3], 26.70 μg/mL for CAPE [46], 10.04 μg/mL for eugenol [50], 9.5 μg/mL for resveratrol [51], 173.25 μg/mL for taxifolin [52], 19.25 μg/mL for olivetol [53], 15.6 μg/mL for L-Adrenaline [55], and 34.5 μg/mL for curcumin [56] (as a biologically active and bright yellow chemical produced by Curcuma longa species).
It is well known that many antioxidants such as Coumestrol are able to interact with some proteins, including enzymes. For example, flavonoids interact with albumin, and catechins interact with milk casein [80]. These interactions modify both antioxidant effectiveness and pharmacological abilities. In this case, protein structure and stability can be altered, because the binding (by weak van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding) of an antioxidant could affect the weak interactions involved in secondary and tertiary protein structures. The most striking example of this is the binding of flavonoids to albumin and their effect on antioxidant activities. The α-glycosidase inhibition results showed that Coumestrol had a more effective Ki value than Acarbose, which is a starch blocker. It is well known that controlling serum glucose levels by inhibiting the α-glycosidase enzyme in T2DM is one of crucial strategies to prevent clinical complications including heart disease, metabolic syndrome, blindness, and renal dysfunction [81]. Also, increased oxidative stress is an important and common parameter in the development and progression of diabetes and its complications. Phenolics are slightly acidic and they form highly water-soluble phenolate anions by losing protons (H+) from their hydroxyl groups. It is also known that phenols have effective inhibition profiles on CA isoenzymes [82] due to the presence of some functional groups in their scaffold, mainly the phenolic -OH, -C=O, -OCH3 and -COOH groups, which may coordinate to the Zn2+ ion in the active-side of the CA cavity [83].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

Coumestrol, α-Tocopherol, BHA, BHT, Trolox, DPPH•, ABTS and DMPD were commercially obtained from Sigma-Aldrich GmbH (Steinheim, Germany).

4.2. Reducing Ability Assays

The Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol was realized according to our previous study [84]. The absorbance values of Coumestrol and standards were measured at 700 nm [85]. The Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol was determined using a slight modification of the method of Apak et al. [86] After performing the necessary experimental procedures, the absorbances were recorded at 450 nm spectrophotometrically [87]. On the other hand, the FRAP reduction ability of Coumestrol was performed according to a prior study. For this method, the absorbance of the reducing ability of Coumestrol and of standards were recorded at 593 nm [88].

4.3. Radical Scavenging Activities

The DPPH•-scavenging activity of Coumestrol was performed according to the Blois method [89]. The absorbance values of remaining DPPH• were recorded at 517 nm [90]. Also, the ABTS•+-scavenging activity of Coumestrol was developed according to another study and recorded at 734 nm [91]. The DMPD•+ removal ability of Coumestrol was defined according to the method of Fogliano [92] as described previously [93]. The absorbance values of remaining DMPD•+ was recorded at 505 nm [94].

4.4. Anticholinergic Assay

The inhibition effect of Coumestrol towards AChE/BChE from electric eel (Electrophorus electricus)/equine serum was realized according to the Ellman method [95]. The absorbance values were recorded at 412 nm [96].

4.5. Antidiabetic Assay

The α-Glycosidase inhibition effect of Coumestrol was evaluated using p-nitrophenyl-D-glucopyranoside (p-NPG) as the substrate, according to the method described by Tao et al. [60]. The absorbances of samples were measured at 405 nm [97]. One α-glycosidase unit was the enzyme quantity, which catalyzes 1.0 mol of substrate per minute (pH 7.4) [98].

4.6. Antiglaucoma Assay

Human erythrocytes were used as the CA II isoenzyme source. Fresh human erythrocytes were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min. Then, they were precipitated and the serum was separated and adjusted with solid Tris to pH 8.7 [99]. The CA II isoenzyme was purified using Sepharose-4B-L-Tirozyne-sulfanylamide affinity column chromatography [100]. The sample was applied to the affinity column and equilibrated with Tris-Na2SO4/HCl (22 mM/25 mM, pH: 8.7). Finally, the hCA II isozyme was eluted with sodium acetate/NaClO4 (0.5 M, pH 5.6, 25 °C) [101]. The protein content during the purification steps was determined via the Bradford method [102]. Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard protein [103]. The purity of the hCA II isoform was controlled by SDS-PAGE as described in prior studies [104]. During the purification and inhibition process of hCA II, esterase activity was examined. The CA II isoenzyme activity was determined by following the change in absorbance at 348 nm [105].

4.7. IC50 Values Determination

The IC50 values were calculated from activity (%) versus Coumestrol plots [106]. Lineweaver–Burk graphs were used for the determination of Ki values and other inhibition parameters [107].

5. Conclusions

In this study, it was observed that Coumestrol has significant and effective antioxidant ability, investigated by several in vitro methods, when compared with standards. Also, it was shown that Coumestrol, which has a large spectrum of crucial biological abilities, is an active compound that can remove ROS and free radicals by donating an electron (e−) or hydrogen atom (H) to free radicals. Also, the results obtained from this study clearly show that Coumestrol is a safer natural phenolic antioxidant that can be used in pharmaceutical and food applications for preventing or delaying the occurrence of oxidation processes. It can extend the shelf-life of pharmaceuticals and foodstuffs and maintain nutritional quality. The results obtained in this study contribute to the evidence that Coumestrol has antidiabetic, anticholinergic, and anti-glaucoma effects and can be used to treat diseases such as glaucoma, T2DM, and AD, which are common and global diseases.

Author Contributions

Methodology and investigation, L.D., A.E., L.P.K., E.M.U., Z.B. and R.S.; writing–original draft preparation, writing–review and editing, supervision, funding, and acquisition, M.A., İ.G. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

İlhami Gulcin is a member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA). He would like to extend his sincere appreciation to the TÜBA for financial support. Saleh Alwasel would like to extend his sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2022/59), King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a publicly accessible repository.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Serbetci Tohma, H.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and radical scavenging activity of aerial parts and roots of Turkish liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.). Int. J. Food Prop. 2010, 13, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gulcin, I.; Beydemir, S.; Sat, I.G.; Küfrevioğlu, O.I. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of cornelian cherry (Cornus mas L.). Acta Aliment. 2005, 34, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cetin Cakmak, K.; Gulcin, I. Anticholinergic and antioxidant activities of usnic acid-An activity-structure insight. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bingol, Z.; Kızıltas, H.; Goren, A.C.; Polat Kose, L.; Topal, M.; Durmaz, L.; Alwasel, S.H.; Gulcin, I. Antidiabetic, anticholinergic and antioxidant activities of aerial parts of shaggy bindweed (Convulvulus betonicifolia Miller subsp.)-profiling of phenolic compounds by LC-HRMS. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Balaydın, H.T.; Gulcin, I.; Menzek, A.; Goksu, S.; Sahin, E. Synthesis and antioxidant properties of diphenylmethane derivative bromophenols including a natural product. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2010, 25, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gulcin, I.; Beydemir, S.; Topal, F.; Gagua, N.; Bakuridze, A.; Bayram, R.; Gepdiremen, A. Apoptotic, antioxidant and antiradical effect of majdine and isomajdine from Vinca herbacea Waldst. and kit. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Koksal, E.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 2008, 32, 65–78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalin, P.; Gulcin, I.; Goren, A.C. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol content of cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Rec. Nat. Prod. 2015, 9, 496–502. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kızıltas, H.; Bingol, Z.; Goren, A.C.; Polat Kose, L.; Durmaz, L.; Topal, F.; Alwasel, S.H.; Gulcin, I. LC-HRMS profiling, antidiabetic, anticholinergic and anti-oxidant activities of aerial parts of kınkor (Ferulago stelleta). Molecules 2021, 26, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gulcin, I.; Taslimi, P.; Aygun, A.; Sadeghian, N.; Bastem, E.; Kufrevioglu, Ö.İ.; Turkan, F.; Sen, F. Antidiabetic and antiparasitic potentials: Inhibition effects of some natural antioxidant compounds on α-glycosidase, α-amylase and human glutathione S-transferase enzymes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ozbey, F.; Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, I.; Maras, A.; Goksu, S.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis, acetylcholinesterase, butyrilcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase inhibitory and metal chelating properties of some novel diaryl ether. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Taslimi, P.; Aslan, H.E.; Demir, Y.; Oztaskın, N.; Maras, A.; Gulçin, I.; Beydemir, S.; Goksu, S. Diarilmethanon, bromophenols and diarilmetan compounds: Discovery of potent aldose reductase, α-amylase and α-glycosidase inhibitors as new therapeutic approach in diabetes and functional hyperglycemia. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Erdemir, F.; Barut Celepci, D.; Aktas, A.; Taslimi, P.; Gok, Y.; Karabıyık, H.; Gulcin, I. 2-Hydroxyethyl substituted NHC precursors: Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure and carbonic anhydrase, α-glycosidase, butyrylcholinesterase, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1155, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Genc Bilgicli, H.; Ergon, D.; Taslimi, P.; Tuzun, B.; Akyazı Kuru, I.; Zengin, M.; Gulcin, I. Novel propanolamine derivatives attached to 2-metoxifenol moiety: Synthesis, characterization, biological properties, and molecular docking studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 101, 103969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Turkan, F.; Cetin, A.; Taslimi, P.; Karaman, M.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking of novel pyrazole derivatives as potent carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 86, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, C.Y.; Su, S.Y.; Tang, N.Y.; Ho, T.Y.; Chiang, S.Y.; Hsieh, C.L. Ferulic acid provides neuroprotection against oxidative stress-related apoptosis after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting ICAM-1 mRNA expression in rats. Brain Res. 2008, 1209, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Topal, F.; Gulcin, I.; Dastan, A.; Guney, M. Novel eugenol derivatives: Potent acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 94, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oztaskin, N.; Cetinkaya, Y.; Taslimi, P.; Goksu, S.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase inhibition properties of novel bromophenol derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2015, 60, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gulcin, I.; Dastan, A. Synthesis of dimeric phenol derivatives and determination of in vitro antioxidant and radical scavenging activities. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2007, 22, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Polat Kose, L.; Gulcin, I.; Goren, A.C.; Namiesnik, J.; Martinez-Ayala, A.L.; Gorinstein, S. LC-MS/MS analysis, antioxidant and anticholinergic properties of galanga (Alpinia officinarum Hance) rhizomes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tohma, H.; Koksal, E.; Kılıc, O.; Alan, Y.; Yılmaz, M.A.; Gulcin, I.; Bursal, E.; Alwasel, S.H. RP-HPLC/MS/MS analysis of the phenolic compounds, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Salvia L. species. Antioxidants 2016, 5, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Hamad, H.O.; Alma, M.H.; Gulcin, I.; Yılmaz, M.A.; Karaogul, E. Evaluation of phenolic contents and bioactivity of root and nutgall extracts from Iraqian Quercus infectoria Olivier. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2017, 11, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  23. Koksal, E.; Bursal, E.; Gulcin, I.; Korkmaz, M.; Caglayan, C.; Goren, A.C.; Alwasel, S.H. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol content of Turkish thyme (Thymus vulgaris) monitored by LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Skrypnik, L.; Grigorev, N.; Michailov, D.; Antipina, M.; Danilova, M.; Pungin, A. Comparative study on radical scavenging activity and phenolic compounds content in water bark extracts of alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elmastas, M.; Turkekul, I.; Oztürk, L.; Gulcin, I.; Isildak, Ö.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. The antioxidant activity of two wild edible mushrooms (Morchella vulgaris and Morchella esculanta). Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2006, 9, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koksal, E.; Bursal, E.; Dikici, E.; Tozoglu, F.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of Melissa officinalis leaves. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  27. Montero, G.; Arriagada, F.; Gunther, G.; Bollo, S.; Mura, F.; Berrios, E.; Morales, J. Phytoestrogen coumestrol: Antioxidant capacity and its loading in albumin nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 562, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ha, J.; Kang, Y.G.; Lee, T.; Kim, M.; Yoon, M.Y.; Lee, E.; Yang, X.; Kim, D.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, T.R.; et al. Comprehensive RNA sequencing and co-expression network analysis to complete the biosynthetic pathway of coumestrol, a phytoestrogen. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garibov, E.; Taslimi, P.; Sujayev, A.; Bingol, Z.; Cetinkaya, S.; Gulcin, I.; Beydemir, S.; Farzaliyev, V.; Alwasel, S.H.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis of 4,5-disubstituted-2-thioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidines and investigation of their acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase I/II inhibitory and antioxidant activities. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Taslimi, P.; Osmanova, S.; Caglayan, C.; Turkan, F.; Sardarova, S.; Farzaliyev, F.; Sujayev, E.; Sadeghian, N.; Gulcin, I. Novel amides of 1,1-bis-(carboxymethylthio)-1-arylethanes: Synthesis, characterization, and acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory properties. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, e22191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bayrak, C.; Taslimi, P.; Kahraman, H.S.; Gulcin, I.; Menzek, A. The first synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibition and anticholinergic activities of some bromophenol derivatives with S including natural products. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 85, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ozgeris, B.; Goksu, S.; Kose Polat, L.; Gulcin, I.; Salmas, R.E.; Durdagi, S.; Tumer, F.; Supuran, C.T. Acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory properties of novel urea and sulfamide derivatives incorporating dopaminergic 2-aminotetralin scaffolds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Arabaci, B.; Gulcin, I.; Alwasel, S. Capsaicin: A potent inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes. Molecules 2014, 19, 10103–10114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yigit, B.; Kaya, R.; Taslimi, P.; Isık, Y.; Karaman, M.; Yigit, M.; Ozdemir, I.; Gulcin, I. Imidazolinium chloride salts bearing wing tip groups: Synthesis, molecular docking and metabolic enzymes inhibition. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1179, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tham, Y.C.; Li, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Quigley, H.A.; Aung, T.; Cheng, C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2081–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, J.; Li, B.; Huang, D.; Norat, P.; Grannonico, M.; Cooper, R.C.; Gui, Q.; Chow, W.N.; Liu, X.; Yang, H. Nano-in-Nano dendrimer gel particles for efficient topical delivery of antiglaucoma drugs into the eye. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 130498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hou, Z.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Guo, C.; Lin, B.; Liu, Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of carbohydrate-based sulphonamide derivatives as topical antiglaucoma agents through selective inhibition of carbonic anhydrase II. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. D’Ascenzio, M.; Guglielmi, P.; Carradori, S.; Secci, D.; Florio, R.; Mollica, A.; Ceruso, M.; Akdemir, A.; Sobolev, A.P.; Supuran, C.T. Open saccharin-based secondary sulfonamides as potent and selective inhibitors of cancer-related carbonic anhydrase IX and XII isoforms. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mollica, A.; Costante, R.; Akdemir, A.; Carradori, S.; Stefanucci, A.; Macedonio, G.; Ceruso, M.; Supuran, C.T. Exploring new Probenecid-based carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: Synthesis, biological evaluation and docking studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 5311–5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Monte, C.; Carradori, S.; Gentili, A.; Mollica, A.; Trisciuoglio, D.; Supuran, C.T. Dual cyclooxygenase and carbonic anhydrase inhibition by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 2812–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boztas, M.; Cetinkaya, Y.; Topal, M.; Gulcin, I.; Menzek, A.; Sahin, E.; Tanc, M.; Supuran, C.T. Synthesis and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II, IX, and XII inhibitory effects of dimethoxy-bromophenol derivatives incorporating cyclopropane moieties. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kiziltas, H.; Bingol, Z.; Goren, A.C.; Alwasel, S.H.; Gulcin, I. Anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Ferula orientalis L.-Analysis of its polyphenol contents by LC-HRMS. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2021, 15, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Polat Kose, L.; Bingol, Z.; Kaya, R.; Goren, A.C.; Akincioglu, H.; Durmaz, L.; Koksal, E.; Alwasel, S.; Gulcin, I. Anticholinergic and antioxidant activities of avocado (Folium perseae) leaves—Phytochemical content by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Int. J. Food Prop. 2020, 23, 878–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bursal, E.; Gulcin, I. Polyphenol contents and in vitro antioxidant activities of lyophilized aqueous extract of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gulcin, I.; Kaya, R.; Goren, A.C.; Akıncıoglu, H.; Topal, M.; Bingol, Z.; Cetin Cakmak, K.; Ozturk Sarikaya, S.B.; Durmaz, L.; Alwasel, S. Anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) bark extracts: Polyphenol contents analysis by LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1511–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid). Toxicology 2006, 217, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gulcin, I.; Oktay, M.; Koksal, E.; Serbetci, H.; Beydemir, S.; Kufrevioglu, Ö.I. Antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of uric acid. Asian J. Chem. 2008, 20, 2079–2090. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gulcin, I.; Huyut, Z.; Elmastas, M.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Radical scavenging and antioxidant activity of tannic acid. Arab. J. Chem. 2010, 3, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gocer, H.; Gulcin, I. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE): Correlation of structure and antioxidant properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of eugenol-a structure and activity relationship study. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 975–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant properties of resveratrol: A structure-activity insight. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 2010, 11, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Topal, F.; Topal, M.; Gocer, H.; Kalın, P.; Kocyigit, U.M.; Gulcin, I.; Alwasel, S.H. Antioxidant activity of taxifolin: An activity-structure relationship. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and anticholinergic properties of olivetol. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Köksal, E.; Gulcin, I.; Ozturk Sarikaya, S.B.; Bursal, E. On the in vitro antioxidant activity of silymarin. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of L-Adrenaline: An activity-structure insight. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 179, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ak, T.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of curcumin. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2008, 174, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Karimov, A.; Orujova, A.; Taslimi, P.; Sadeghian, N.; Mammadov, B.; Karaman, H.S.; Farzaliyev, V.; Sujayev, A.; Tas, R.; Alwasel, S.; et al. Novel functionally substituted esters based on sodium diethyldithiocarbamate derivatives: Synthesis, characterization, biological activity and molecular docking studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 99, 103762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gulcin, I.; Scozzafava, A.; Supuran, C.T.; Akıncıoglu, H.; Koksal, Z.; Turkan, F.; Alwasel, S. The effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) metabolic enzymes including acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, glutathione s-transferase, lactoperoxidase and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II, IX and XII. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gocer, H.; Topal, F.; Topal, M.; Kucuk, M.; Teke, D.; Gulcin, I.; Alwasel, S.H.; Supuran, C.T. Acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I and II inhibition profiles of taxifolin. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Y. Rapid screening and identification of α-glucosidase inhibitors from mulberry leaves using enzyme-immobilized magnetic beads coupled with HPLC/MS and NMR. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2013, 27, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eruygur, N.; Atas, M.; Tekin, M.; Taslimi, P.; Kocyigit, U.M.; Gulcin, I. In vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticholinesterase and antidiabetic activities of Turkish endemic Achillea cucullata (Asteraceae) from ethanol extract. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 120, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hashmi, S.; Khan, S.; Shafiq, Z.; Taslimi, P.; Ishaq, M.; Sadeghian, N.; Karaman, S.H.; Akhtar, N.; Islam, M.; Asari, A.; et al. Probing 4-(diethylamino)-salicylaldehyde-based thiosemicarbazones as multi-target directed ligands against cholinesterases, carbonic anhydrases and α-glycosidase enzymes. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kazancı, A.; Gok, Y.; Kaya, R.; Aktas, A.; Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis, characterization and bioactivities of dative donor ligand N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) precursors and their Ag(I)NHC coordination compounds. Polyhedron 2021, 193, 114866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gulcin, I.; Topal, F.; Cakmakcı, R.; Goren, A.C.; Bilsel, M.; Erdogan, U. Pomological features, nutritional quality, polyphenol content analysis and antioxidant properties of domesticated and three wild ecotype forms of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.). J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, C585–C593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bursal, E.; Aras, A.; Kılıc, O.; Taslimi, P.; Gören, A.C.; Gulcin, I. Phytochemical content, antioxidant activity and enzyme inhibition effect of Salvia eriophora Boiss. & Kotschy against acetylcholinesterase, α-amylase, butyrylcholinesterase and α-glycosidase enzymes. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12776. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Oktay, M.; Gulcin, I.; Kufrevioglu, Ö.İ. Determination of in vitro antioxidant activity of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seed extracts. Lebensm. Wissen. Technol. 2003, 36, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gocer, H.; Akıncıoglu, A.; Oztaskın, N.; Goksu, S.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis, antioxidant and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of sulfonamide derivatives of dopamine related compounds. Arch. Pharm 2013, 346, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taslimi, P.; Koksal, E.; Goren, A.C.; Bursal, E.; Aras, A.; Kılıc, O.; Alwasel, S.; Gulcin, I. Anti-Alzheimer, antidiabetic and antioxidant potential of Satureja cuneifolia and analysis of its phenolic contents by LC-MS/MS. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 4528–4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of food constituents: An overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 345–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Artunc, T.; Menzek, A.; Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, I.; Kazaz, C.; Şahin, E. Synthesis and antioxidant activities of phenol derivatives from 1,6-bis(dimethoxyphenyl)hexane-1,6-dione. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Topal, M.; Gocer, H.; Topal, F.; Kalin, P.; Polat Kose, P.; Gulcin, I.; Cetin Cakmak, K.; Kucuk, M.; Durmaz, L.; Goren, A.C.; et al. Antioxidant, antiradical and anticholinergic properties of cynarin purified from the illyrian thistle (Onopordum illyricum L.). J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Gulcin, I.; Alici, H.A.; Cesur, M. Determination of in vitro antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of propofol. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Gulcin, I. Comparison of in vitro antioxidant and antiradical activities of L-tyrosine and L-Dopa. Amino Acids 2007, 32, 431–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Burda, S.; Oleszek, W. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of flavonoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 2774–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Xi, G.L.; Liu, Z.Q. Coumestan inhibits radical-induced oxidation of DNA: Is hydroxyl a necessary functional group? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 5636–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, X.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lin, J.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, D. Effect and mechanism of wedelolactone as antioxidant-coumestan on OH-treated mesenchymal stem cells. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Oztaskin, N.; Kaya, R.; Maras, A.; Sahin, E.; Gulcin, I.; Goksu, S. Synthesis and characterization of novel bromophenols: Determination of their anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 87, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gulcin, I.; Tel, A.Z.; Goren, A.C.; Taslimi, P.; Alwasel, S. Sage (Salvia pilifera): Determination its polyphenol contents, anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 2062–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of L-carnitine. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hasni, I.; Bourassa, P.; Hamdani, S.; Samson, G.; Carpentier, R.; Tajmir-Riahi, H.A. Interaction of milk α- and β-caseins with tea polyphenols. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Polat Kose, L.; Gulcin, I. Inhibition effects of some lignans on carbonic anhydrase, acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase enzymes. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2017, 11, 558–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aksu, K.; Ozgeriş, B.; Taslimi, P.; Naderi, A.; Gulcin, I.; Goksu, S. Antioxidant activity, acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory properties of novel ureas derived from phenethylamines. Arch. Pharm. 2016, 349, 944–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Erdoğan, M.; Polat Kose, L.; Essiz, S.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis and biological evaluation of some 1-naphthol derivatives as antioxidants, acetylcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Arch. Pharm. 2021, 354, e2100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Han, H.; Yılmaz, H.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant activity of flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and analysis of its polyphenol contents by LC-MS/MS. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2018, 12, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tohma, H.; Gulçin, I.; Bursal, E.; Gören, A.C.; Alwasel, S.H.; Köksal, E. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) determined by HPLC-MS/MS. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2017, 11, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Apak, R.; Calokerinos, A.; Gorinstein, S.; Segundo, M.A.; Hibbert, D.B.; Gulcin, I.; Demirci Cekic, S.; Guclu, K.; Ozyürek, M.; Esin Celik, S.; et al. Methods to evaluate the scavenging activity of antioxidants toward reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Pure Appl. Chem. 2022, 94, 87–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maharramova, G.; Taslimi, P.; Sujayev, A.; Farzaliyev, F.; Durmaz, L.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis, characterization, antioxidant, antidiabetic, anticholinergic, and antiepileptic properties of novel N-substituted tetrahydropyrimidines based on phenylthiourea. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, e22221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rezai, M.; Bayrak, C.; Taslimi, P.; Gulcin, I.; Menzek, A. The first synthesis, antioxidant and anticholinergic activities of 1-(4,5-dihydroxybenzyl)pyrrolidin-2-one derivative bromophenols including natural products. Turk. J. Chem. 2018, 42, 808–825. [Google Scholar]
  89. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 1958, 26, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cetinkaya, Y.; Gocer, H.; Menzek, A.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis and antioxidant properties of (3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) (2,3,4-trihydroxyphenyl)methanone and its derivatives. Arch. Pharm. 2012, 345, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bulut, N.; Koçyiğit, U.M.; Gecibesler, I.H.; Dastan, T.; Karci, H.; Taslimi, P.; Durna Dastan, S.; Gulcin, I.; Cetin, A. Synthesis of some novel pyridine compounds containing bis-1,2,4-triazole moiety and investigation of their antioxidant properties, carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase enzymes inhibition profiles. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, e22006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Fogliano, V.; Verde, V.; Randazzo, G.; Ritiene, A. Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Polat Kose, L.; Gulcin, I. Evaluation of the antioxidant and antiradical properties of some phyto and mammalian lignans. Molecules 2021, 26, 7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gulcin, I.; Alwasel, S.H. Metal ions, metal chelators and metal chelating assay as antioxidant method. Processes 2022, 10, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres Jr, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Taslimi, P.; Sujayev, E.; Turkan, F.; Garibov, E.; Huyut, Z.; Farzaliyev, F.; Mamedova, S.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis and investigation of the conversion reactions of pyrimidine-thiones with nucleophilic reagent and evaluation of their acetylcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase inhibition and antioxidant activities. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, e22019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Aktas, A.; Barut Celepci, D.; Gok, Y.; Taslimi, P.; Akıncıoğlu, H.; Gulcin, I. A novel Ag-N-heterocyclic carbene complex bearing the hydroxyethyl ligand: Synthesis, characterization, crystal and spectral structures and bioactivity properties. Crystals 2020, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Mahmudov, I.; Demir, Y.; Sert, Y.; Abdullayev, Y.; Sujayev, E.; Alwasel, S.H.; Gulcin, I. Synthesis and inhibition profiles of N-benzyl- and N-allyl aniline derivatives against carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase-A molecular docking study. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Burmaoglu, S.; Akın Kazancioglu, E.; Kazancioglu, M.Z.; Saglamtas, R.; Yalcın, G.; Gulcin, I.; Algul, O. Synthesis, molecular docking and some metabolic enzyme inhibition properties of biphenyl-substituted chalcone derivatives. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1254, 132358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yigit, M.; Barut Celepci, D.; Taslimi, P.; Yigit, B.; Cetinkaya, B.; Ozdemir, I.; Aygün, M.; Gulcin, I. Selenourea and thiourea derivatives of chiral and achiral enetetramines: Synthesis, characterization and enzyme inhibitory properties. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 120, 105566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bal, S.; Demirci, O.; Sen, B.; Taskin Tok, T.; Taslimi, P.; Aktas, A.; Gok, Y.; Aygun, M.; Gulcin, I. Silver N-heterocyclic carbene complexes bearing fluorinated benzyl group: Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure, computational studies, and inhibitory properties against some metabolic enzymes. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kalın, R.; Koksal, Z.; Bayrak, S.; Gerni, S.; Ozyurek, I.N.; Usanmaz, H.; Karaman, M.; Atasever, F.; Ozdemir, H.; Gulcin, I. Molecular docking and inhibition profiles of some antibiotics on lactoperoxidase enzyme purified from bovine milk. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 40, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Aggul, A.G.; Taslimi, P.; Kuzu, M.; Uzun, N.; Bilginer, S.; Gulcin, I. Oleuropein and verbascoside-Their inhibition effects on carbonic anhydrase and molecular docking studies. J. Oleo Sci. 2021, 70, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kuzu, B.; Tan, M.; Gulcin, I.; Menges, N. A novel class for carbonic anhydrases inhibitors and evaluation of their non-zinc binding. Arch. Pharm. 2021, 354, e2100188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nar, M.; Cetinkaya, Y.; Gulcin, I.; Menzek, A. (3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)(2,3,4-trihydroxyphenyl)methanone and its derivatives as carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2013, 28, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 03091 g001 550
Figure 1. Commonly used standard inhibitors for carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II (CA II) (A), for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) (B) and for α-glycosidase (α-Gly) (C).
Figure 1. Commonly used standard inhibitors for carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II (CA II) (A), for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) (B) and for α-glycosidase (α-Gly) (C).
Molecules 27 03091 g001
Molecules 27 03091 g002 550
Figure 2. Biosynthesis pathway of Coumestrol from daidzein.
Figure 2. Biosynthesis pathway of Coumestrol from daidzein.
Molecules 27 03091 g002
Molecules 27 03091 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of standards; (B) Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of standards.
Figure 3. (A) Fe3+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of standards; (B) Cu2+-reducing activity of Coumestrol and of standards.
Molecules 27 03091 g003
Molecules 27 03091 g004 550
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging activities of Coumestrol and of standard antioxidants: (A) DPPH•-scavenging, (B) ABTS•+-scavenging, and (C) DMPD•+-scavenging effects.
Figure 4. Radical-scavenging activities of Coumestrol and of standard antioxidants: (A) DPPH•-scavenging, (B) ABTS•+-scavenging, and (C) DMPD•+-scavenging effects.
Molecules 27 03091 g004
Molecules 27 03091 g005 550
Figure 5. Lineweaver–Burk graphs of Coumestrol against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (A), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) (B), α-glycosidase (C), and carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) (D).
Figure 5. Lineweaver–Burk graphs of Coumestrol against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (A), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) (B), α-glycosidase (C), and carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) (D).
Molecules 27 03091 g005
Molecules 27 03091 g006 550
Figure 6. Purposed DPPH radical-scavenging mechanism between Coumestrol and DPPH radicals.
Figure 6. Purposed DPPH radical-scavenging mechanism between Coumestrol and DPPH radicals.
Molecules 27 03091 g006
Table
Table 1. Fe3+- and Cu2+-reducing activities of Coumestrol and of standards at 30 μg/mL.
Table 1. Fe3+- and Cu2+-reducing activities of Coumestrol and of standards at 30 μg/mL.
AntioxidantsFe3+ Reducing *Cu2+ Reducing *
λ (593 nm)r2λ (450 nm)r2
BHA2.347 ± 0.046 a0.90862.216 ± 0.059 a0.9928
BHT0.952 ± 0.023 b0.91542.044 ± 0.041 a0.9937
Trolox2.119 ± 0.001 a0.95861.548 ± 0.024 a0.9305
α-Tocopherol0.957 ± 0.018 b0.98630.816 ± 0.041 b0.9897
Coumestrol0.739 ± 0.014 b0.94780.780 ± 0.033 b0.9981
* The values are averages of n = 3 parallel measurements and presented as mean ± SD. Superscript a corresponds to very significant differences between parameters within each group and control value (p < 0.01). Superscript b corresponds to significant differences (p < 0.5) between parameters within each group and control value.
Table
Table 2. IC50 (μg/mL) values for DPPH•-, ABTS•+- and DMPD•+-scavenging activities of Coumestrol and of standard antioxidants.
Table 2. IC50 (μg/mL) values for DPPH•-, ABTS•+- and DMPD•+-scavenging activities of Coumestrol and of standard antioxidants.
AntioxidantsDPPH• ScavengingABTS•+ ScavengingDMPD•+ Scavenging
IC50r2IC50r2IC50r2
BHA10.100.90155.070.935611.990.9580
BHT25.950.92216.990.93508.720.9375
Trolox7.050.96146.160.96924.330.9447
α-Tocopherol11.310.96428.370.90157.110.9509
Coumestrol25.950.900512.240.960312.810.9975
Table
Table 3. The enzyme inhibition parameters of Coumestrol against carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II (CA II), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and α-glycosidase (α-Gly) enzymes.
Table 3. The enzyme inhibition parameters of Coumestrol against carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II (CA II), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), and α-glycosidase (α-Gly) enzymes.
CompoundsIC50 (nM)Ki (nM)
CA IIr2AChEr2BChEr2α-Glyr2CA IIAChEBChEα-Gly
Coumestrol44.040.937021.120.940818.190.959427.510.948723.80 ± 2.1721.43 ± 3.7021.65 ± 2.2310.86 ± 0.75
Acetazolamide *8.370.9825------4.41 ± 0.35---
Tacrine **--5.970.97068.370.9846---2.43 ± 0.925.99 ± 1.79-
Acarbose ***------22800-----
* Acetazolamide is a standard inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase II isoenzyme (CA II). ** Tacrine is a standard inhibitor for AChE. *** Acarbose is a standard inhibitor for α-glycosidase [60].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Durmaz, L.; Erturk, A.; Akyüz, M.; Polat Kose, L.; Uc, E.M.; Bingol, Z.; Saglamtas, R.; Alwasel, S.; Gulcin, İ. Screening of Carbonic Anhydrase, Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase, and α-Glycosidase Enzyme Inhibition Effects and Antioxidant Activity of Coumestrol. Molecules 2022, 27, 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103091

AMA Style

Durmaz L, Erturk A, Akyüz M, Polat Kose L, Uc EM, Bingol Z, Saglamtas R, Alwasel S, Gulcin İ. Screening of Carbonic Anhydrase, Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase, and α-Glycosidase Enzyme Inhibition Effects and Antioxidant Activity of Coumestrol. Molecules. 2022; 27(10):3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Durmaz, Lokman, Adem Erturk, Mehmet Akyüz, Leyla Polat Kose, Eda Mehtap Uc, Zeynebe Bingol, Ruya Saglamtas, Saleh Alwasel, and İlhami Gulcin. 2022. "Screening of Carbonic Anhydrase, Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase, and α-Glycosidase Enzyme Inhibition Effects and Antioxidant Activity of Coumestrol" Molecules 27, no. 10: 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103091

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop