Next Article in Journal
An Investigation towards Coupling Molecular Dynamics with Computational Fluid Dynamics for Modelling Polymer Pyrolysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolite Fingerprinting Based on 1H-NMR Spectroscopy and Liquid Chromatography for the Authentication of Herbal Products
Previous Article in Journal
Two Possible Strategies for Drug Modification of Gemcitabine and Future Contributions to Personalized Medicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbial Transformation of Prenylquercetins by Mucor hiemalis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules27010287
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Activities and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Profile of Muntingia calabura Leaves Extract

by
Nur Khaleeda Zulaikha Zolkeflee
1,
Nurul Shazini Ramli
2,
Azrina Azlan
3 and
Faridah Abas
1,2,*
1
Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
3
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(1), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010287
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue NMR and Mass Spectrometry in Plant Metabolomics, Compound Isolation and Characterisation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anti-diabetic compounds from natural sources are now being preferred to prevent or treat diabetes due to adverse effects of synthetic drugs. The decoction of Muntingia calabura leaves was traditionally consumed for diabetes treatment. However, there has not been any published data currently available on the processing effects on this plant’s biological activity and phytochemical profile. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effect of three drying methods (freeze-drying (FD), air-drying (AD), and oven-drying (OD)) and ethanol:water ratios (0, 50, and 100%) on in vitro anti-diabetic activities of M. calabura leaves. In addition, an ultrahigh-performance-liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method was used to characterize the metabolites in the active extract. The FD M. calabura leaves, extracted with 50% ethanol, is the most active extract that exhibits a high α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 0.46 ± 0.05 and 26.39 ± 3.93 µg/mL, respectively. Sixty-one compounds were tentatively identified by using UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS from the most active extract. Quantitative analysis, by using UHPLC, revealed that geniposide, daidzein, quercitrin, 6-hydroxyflavanone, kaempferol, and formononetin were predominant compounds identified from the active extract. The results have laid down preliminary steps toward developing M. calabura leaves extract as a potential source of bioactive compounds for diabetic treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder and an inappropriate hyperglycemia due to either insulin secretion deficiency or a combination of insulin resistance and inadequate insulin secretion to compensate blood glucose levels [1]. While the type 1 is usually associated with the destruction of pancreatic islet β-cell by the autoimmune process, the type 2 diabetes involves a combination of insulin resistance and defective compensatory insulin secretion [2]. In Malaysia, one in five adults, or 18.3% of the population, is estimated to suffer from the implications of DM in 2019, and these numbers are expected to grow, as a spike has been observed from 13.4% diabetes prevalence in a 2015 report [3]. There are six major drug classes that manage hyperglycemia in DM patients, including biguanides (i.e., metformin), thiazolidinediones (i.e., pioglitazone), sulfonylureas (i.e., glimepiride), meglitinides (i.e., repaglinide), dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors (i.e., sitagliptin), and α-glucosidase inhibitors (i.e., acarbose) [1,4,5,6,7]. However, the naturally occurring anti-diabetic compounds are now gaining popularity as an efficient and wholesome approach toward diabetes management as an alternative compared to synthetic drugs that cause toxic side effects such as hepatic disorders and other negative gastrointestinal symptoms after the consumption over period of time [8,9].
Muntingia calabura L. is one of those many traditional medicinal plants that is known to control blood glucose levels. It is extracted by steeping the dried leaves in hot water [10]. These leaves are also known to cure gastric ulcers, swelling of the prostate gland, and helps in alleviating headache and cold symptoms [11]. M. calabura, originating from the family of Muntingiaceae, commonly known as “ceri hutan” in Malaysia, is widely cultivated in the warmer areas of Asia, including Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, and tropical America. For its high adaptability to strive, even in poor soil conditions including acidic or alkaline, M. calabura is now the most commonly found roadside plants in Malaysia [12]. Several studies have demonstrated the positive attributes of M. calabura and its influence against gastric damages, bacterial and viral infections, hypoglycemic and analgesic effects [10,12,13,14]. M. calabura mainly consists of several compounds, such as triterpenoids (lupenone); flavonoids (5,7-dihydroxyflavanone, 7-hydroxyflavanone, 5-hydroxy-3,7,8-trimethoxyflavone, 5′-hydroxy-7,8,3′,4′-tetramethoxyflavan, 3,5-dihydroxy-7,4′-dimethoxyflavone); phytosterols (β-sitostenone and β-sitosterol), and chalcones derivatives (2′,4′-dihydroxydihydrochalcone, 2′,4′-dihydroxychalcone, and isoliquiritigenin) [15,16,17]. Several studies have compiled the health benefits of these constituent compounds in ameliorating the diabetic complications [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Before commencement of an extraction process, the plant sample is required to undergo a pre-extraction treatment (drying and grinding) to increase the shelf-life, as well as to maximize the extraction of metabolites from the plant [24]. Drying method can be categorized into two types; thermal drying includes the application of heat on the plant sample (hot air-drying, oven-drying (OD), microwave-drying, and sun-drying), while non-thermal drying avoids direct heat to dry the sample (freeze-drying (FD) and air-drying (AD)) [25]. Herbal industries prefers to use oven and AD method in their commercial facilities, as these methods are cost effective and easy to accomplish [26]. The utilization of suitable solvent is one of the key aspects of extraction to give the highest metabolites recovery available in the plant sample. The use of high polarity solvents might affect the solubility of the non-polar compounds, likewise, upon the use of low polarity solvents [27]. The loss of metabolites that are not able to be extracted out may hinder the full capacity of a plant sample to be established as a good antihyperglycemic alternative regimen. Therefore, an efficient extraction process that distills and preserves the indispensable bioactive compounds, contributing to the hypoglycemic effect of a plant extract, is crucial.
Though the hypoglycemic bioactivity of this plant has been previously reported [14], the effects of the drying method and extracting solvent on M. calabura bioactive compounds and, hence, the hypoglycemic activity, has not been discovered. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the optimal combination of drying method and extracting solvents (ethanol:water) with appropriate ratio that can produce M. calabura extracts with the most desirable and potent in vitro anti-diabetic activities. In addition, an ultrahigh-performance-liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method was used to characterize the metabolites of the active extract, based on their MS/MS data, for the first time. The results obtained from this study will allow recommendations on the best combination of drying method and extracting solvent to obtain M. calabura extract with significant potential in selected bioactivity and high productivity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Influence of Varied Drying Process and Ethanol Concentrations on Anti-Diabetic Activity

The bioactivity results of M. calabura leaves extracts, from different drying methods and ethanol:water ratios, are shown in Table 1. M. calabura leaves extracts were tested in two in vitro anti-diabetic assays, named α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition activity. In these two activities, the hypoglycemic potential of M. calabura extracts, to reduce the blood sugar level through competitive binding to the active site of the enzyme to prevent the conversion of carbohydrates to simple glucose, were determined [28]. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was designed to assess the ability of an extract to suppress the active enzyme from catalyzing the conversion of glucose from the disaccharides, which occurs in the small intestine [29]. In this study, PNPG, a specific substrate that allows hydrolyzation to 4-nitrophenol (yellow colored product) by α-glucosidase enzyme, quantitates at a maximum wavelength of 405 nm [30], while α-amylase inhibitory activity was used to measure the free carbonyl group of the reducing sugar (maltose) converted by the α-amylase from the complex carbohydrates (potato starch) [31]. The aldehyde group from the maltose reduces the yellow colored DNS to form 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid (brick red colored solution) [31]. The concentration of maltose presence in the sample, determine the intensity of the color at a wavelength of 540 nm [32].
The results demonstrated in Table 1 show the IC50 value of the α-glucosidase inhibition activity of M. calabura leaves extracts, ranging from 0.46–2.76 µg/mL in comparison to quercetin (2.15 ± 0.26 µg/mL), while for α-amylase inhibition activity, the IC50 value, ranging from 23.84–185.17 µg/mL in comparison to acarbose (0.68 ± 0.14 µg/mL). In α-glucosidase inhibition activity, the effect of different ethanol:water ratios played the most significant role that affected α-glucosidase inhibition ability of M. calabura leaves compared to the different drying methods. The 50 and 100% ethanolic extracts from FD and AD leaves showed the lowest IC50 value with no significant difference (p > 0.05), ranging from 0.46 ± 0.05 to 1.07 ± 0.06 µg/mL. On the contrary, the IC50 value of 50% ethanolic extract from OD leaves was the lowest compared to that of the 100 and 0% ratios from the same drying method, whereas the 0% ethanolic extract from all the drying methods showed significantly lower α-glucosidase inhibition potential compared to that of other extracts. As for the α-amylase inhibition activity, the lowest IC50 value was found in the 50% ethanolic extract, regardless of its drying method, and in the 100% ethanolic extract from the FD method. When comparing the different drying methods, the FD M. calabura leaves showed the highest α-amylase inhibition capability compared to the AD and OD methods in both 50 and 100% ethanolic extracts. However, the OD leaves showed the lowest IC50 value when extracted with 0% ethanol. The use of 50% ethanol, evidently, was the best ethanol:water ratio to extract out the phytochemical constituents with hypoglycemic potential in M. calabura leaves for both tested bioactivities. In line with the previous in vitro study, where the use of alcohol and water mixture could efficiently extract out the wider spectrum of phytochemicals constituents that might contribute to the bioactivity as compared to a mono-component solvent system [33]. Besides that, the utilization of the 50% ethanolic ratio allows utilization of less organic solvent, increasing extract’s solubility in less toxic organic environment and confirming its usage harmlessly in in vivo studies [34].
In this study, FD and AD extracts were procured as the most effective drying methods in order to identify the α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors followed by OD extraction. The absence of thermal degradation hindered the degradative enzyme to function [35]. Several studies have concurred that the FD method enables higher retention of phytochemical compounds that leads to enhanced biological activity of the plant [36]. In contrast, the thermal processing such as oven-drying, hot air-drying, and microwave-drying impeded the extraction of phytochemicals of the plant by thermal breakdown, disrupting the integrity of cell structure and migration of components, catalyzing further disruption by various chemical reactions such as enzymes, light, and oxygen [37]. In addition, the utilization of the FD method will shorten the extraction process by expediting the drying time, compared to the AD technique, as well as potentially providing higher yield of anti-diabetic phytochemical constituents [38,39]. Hence, the 50% ethanol:water ratio on FD M. calabura leaves, with strong α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activity, can be potentially exploited further to create a natural regimen from M. calabura leaves to aid in the blood sugar management of a diabetic patient.

2.2. UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Characterization of Phytoconstituents in the M. calabura Leaves Extract

Based on the anti-diabetic activity of M. calabura leaves, the FD 50% ethanolic extract was identified and selected as the most active extract. This extract was then subjected to UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS identification to have better insight on the constituents present that might enhance the bioactivities. Figure 1 shows the total ion chromatogram and UV-Vis chromatogram (254 nm) of the FD 50% ethanolic M. calabura leaves extract for both positive and negative ion mode. A total of 61 compounds (Table 2) were putatively identified based on their molecular ions in the full scan mass spectra, retention time, fragmentation patterns, mass error, and UV absorption spectra supported with database mining, such as MassBank databases (https://massbank.eu/MassBank/), Human Metabolomics Databases (HMDB) (https://hmdb.ca/), Metabolomics Workbench databases (https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/), Chemspider databases (http://www.chemspider.com/), and MassFrontier (version 8.0) software (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The compounds identified include five catechin derivatives, five types of kaempferol derivatives, three types of quercetin derivatives, one apigenin derivative compound, three types of luteolin derivatives, seven types of daidzein derivatives, 19 types of other flavonoids, two types of anthocyanin compounds, two types of chalcone compounds, six types of quinone derivatives, two types of lactones derivatives, two types of alkaloid derivatives, two types of sugar, one terpene glycoside, and one ellagitannins derivative.

2.2.1. Catechin Derivatives

Catechin (Peak 48) was identified at tR = 1.68 min with protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 291.0640. The fragmentation pattern in the MS/MS analysis for this compound were at m/z 244.9747 [M+H-46]+ (loss of C2H6O), 207.0665 [M+H-84]+ (loss of C4H4O2), and 139.0396 [M+H-152]+ (loss of C8H8O3) [40]. Epigallocatechin (Peak 3) and gallocatechin (Peak 6) were identified at tR = 1.24 and 1.40 min, respectively, with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 305.0668. The ions later produced three fragmentation ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 289.0233 as the base peak of catechin, 245.0284 [M-H-60]− due to loss of C2H4O2, 219.0655 [M-H-86]− due to loss of C3H2O3 and 167.0338 [M-H-138]− due to the loss of C7H6O3 [40]. Figure 2 demonstrates the common fragmentation pathways of the catechin derivatives. Another catechin derivatives named epigallocatechin gallate (Peak 51) was identified at tR = 9.68 min with protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 459.0942, with three fragmentation ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 321.0591 [M+H-138]+ due to dissociation of C7H6O3, 289.0771 [M+H-170]+ as the base peak of catechin, and 275.0818 [M+H-184]+ due to loss of C8H8O5 [40].

2.2.2. Kaempferol Derivatives

Kaempferol (Peak 24) was identified at tR = 11.87 min with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 285.0401, which later produced three characteristic fragment ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 269.0448 [M-H-16]− due to the loss of CH4, m/z 216.9897 [M-H-68]− due to the loss of C4H4O and m/z 119.0491 [M-H-166]− due to the loss of C8H6O4 [40]. Identification of kaempferol was confirmed with the authentic standard. Buddlenoid A (Peak 12) and its isomer (Peak 14) were identified at (tR = 9.43 and 9.75 min). These compounds showed a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 593.1304, which later produced six characteristic fragment ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 447.0935 [M-H-146]−, 429.0823 [M-H-164]−, and 285.0404 [M-H-308]−. The fragmentations occur due to the loss of C9H6O2, C9H8O3, and C15H16O7, respectively. Besides that, the compounds also show a fragmentation pattern typical of kaempferol aglycone at m/z 269.0448, 216.9897, and 119.0491 [41]. This compound was previously isolated and characterized in this plant by Nshimo et al. [42]. Figure 3 depicts the main fragmentation pathways of the kaempferol derivatives. Buddlenoid A dimer (Peak 13) was also identified in abundance at tR = 9.49 min with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 1187.2678. This compound exhibited the same fragmentation patterns in the MS/MS analysis as buddlenoid A, with double of its monomer [41]. Another kaempferol derivative was also identified in the chromatogram at tR = 13.63 min, with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 287.0539. Additionally, m/z 271.0607 [M-H-16]− occurs due to loss of CH4 in the MS/MS analysis, while m/z 269.0723, 216.9894, and 119.0077 are typical fragments for kaempferol derivatives [40]. Hence, this compound was identified as dihydrokaempferol (Peak 37).

2.2.3. Quercetin Derivatives

Quercitrin (Peak 21) and its isomer (Peak 23) was identified at tR = 11.02 and 11.17 min, with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 447.2237, which later produced three characteristic fragment ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 301.1495 [M-H-146]− as the base peak for quercetin, m/z 285.2063 [M-H-162]− due to the loss of C6H10O5 and m/z 245.0717 [M-H-202]− due to the loss of C8H10O6 [40]. Identification of this compound was further confirmed with the authentic standard. Rhamnetin (Peak 52) were also characterized at tR = 12.58 min based on its protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 317.0671 and the three fragmentation ions in the MS/MS analysis. At m/z 301.0973 [M+H-16]+ arose as the base peak for quercetin, as shown in Figure 4. The m/z 285.0734 [M+H-31]+ and m/z 245.1063 [M+H-71]+ occurred due to the loss of CH3O and C3H3O2, respectively [40].

2.2.4. Apigenin Derivatives

One apigenin derivatives named vitexin hydroxymethylglutarate (Peak 30) was identified at tR = 12.72 min, based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 571.748 and the three fragmentation ions in the MS/MS analysis. The product ions were m/z 513.0697 [M-H-62]− due to CH2O3, m/z 341.1581 [M-H-234]− occur due to loss of C9H14O7 and m/z 269.1393 [M-H-306]− as the base peak of apigenin, as shown in Figure 5 [43].

2.2.5. Luteolin Derivatives

One luteolin derivative named velutin (Peak 40) was tentatively identified, as they share three significant product ions [M-H]− at m/z 285.0284, 255.0299, 227.0350, and 213.0395, which were the base peaks for luteolin aglycone [40]. Velutin and its isomers (Peak 40, 45, and 46) were identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 313.0719 at tR = 14.03, 15.01, and 15.19 min [40]. Figure 6 shows the main fragmentation pathways found in luteolin derivatives.

2.2.6. Daidzein Derivatives

Daidzein (Peak 54) and its isomer (Peak 55) were identified with a protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 255.0661 at tR = 13.13 and 13.29 min, respectively. This compound was further characterized with the three fragmentation ions in MS/MS MS/MS analysis at m/z 227.0694 [M+H-28]+ with the loss of C2H4, m/z 213.0553 [M+H-42]+, with loss of C2H2O and m/z 200.9240 [M+H-54]+, and with the loss of C3H2O [40]. Identification of daidzein was confirmed with the authentic standard. Three of daidzein derivatives were also identified in the sample named ononin (Peak 53), 3′-hydroxydaidzein (Peak 56), and formononetin (Peak 58). Ononin (Peak 53) was identified at tR = 13.00 min based on its protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 431.1330 and the fragmentation ions at MS/MS analysis that are similar to the base peak of daidzein, as shown in Figure 7 [40]. Additionally, 3′-hydroxydaidzein (Peak 56) and its isomer (Peak 57) with protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 271.0611 were tentatively identified based on their similar base peak, as of daidzein, as demonstrated in Figure 7 at tR = 14.38 and 14.78 min, respectively [44]. Then, 3′-hydroxydaidzein was previously isolated and characterized in this plant by Matsuda et al. [45]. While at tR = 16.13 and 16.29, formononetin (Peak 58) and its isomer (Peak 59) were identified based on its protonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 269.0819 and the four fragmentation ions at MS/MS analysis that agreed to the base peak of daidzein [40]. The identification of this compound was confirmed with the authentic standard.

2.2.7. Other Flavonoids

Additionally, 3′-Hydroxy-7,8,4′,5′-tetramethoxyflavone (Peak 4) was identified at tR = 1.36 min with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 357.1195, which later produced three fragmentation ions at MS/MS analysis at m/z 270.8385 [M-H-86]− due to the cleavage of C4H6O2, m/z 224.8610 [M-H-132]− due to the cleavage of C6H12O3, and m/z 179.0586 [M-H-178]− due to cleavage of C10H10O3 [46]. This compound was previously isolated and characterized in this plant by Kaneda et al. [46].
Peak 7 was identified as 7,8,3′,4′,5′-pentamethoxyflavone at tR = 2.42 min with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 371.0986. This ion was then further fragmented in MS/MS analysis and produced three fragmentation ions at m/z 296.98684 [M-H-74]− with the loss of C3H6O2, m/z 240.8795 [M-H-130]− with the loss of C6H10O3, and m/z 231.0506 [M-H-140]− with the loss of C7H8O3 [46]. Previously, 7,8,3′,4′,5′-pentamethoxyflavone was also isolated and characterized in M. calabura by Kaneda et al. [46].
At tR = 8.70 min, another flavonoid named hiravanone (Peak 11) was identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 437.0466, with three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 296.8747 [M-H-140]−, 288.7813 [M-H-148]−, and 242.8798 [M-H-194]− due to the loss of C7H8O3, C9H8O2, and C10H10O4, respectively [47]. This compound was previously isolated and characterized in this plant by Seo et al. [47].
Then, 3,5,8-Trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone (Peak 16) and its isomers (Peak 17 and 18) were identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 301.0721 at tR = 10.47, 10.63, and 10.78 min, respectively, with three fragmentation ions in the MS/MS analysis at m/z 286.0490 [M-H-14]− due to the loss of CH2, m/z 269.0465, due to the loss of CH4O, and m/z 211.0475 [M-H-90]− due to the loss of C7H6 [16]. Previously, 3,5,8-Trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone was isolated and characterized in the leaves of M. calabura by Su et al. [16].
A deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 237.0555 and its two fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 209 [M-H-28]− occur due to loss of CO, and m/z 160 [M-H-77]− occurs due to the loss of C6H5, which was identified as hydroxyflavone (Peak 22) at tR = 11.13 min [40].
At tR = 12.30 min, 6,8-diprenyleriodictyol (Peak 25) was tentatively identified with the deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 423.0928. Three fragmentation ions occur in MS/MS analysis due to loss of C4H6O, C8H7O2, and C11H8O2 at m/z 353.2442 [M-H-70]−, 287.6386 [M-H-135]−, and 251.0923 [M-H-172]−, respectively [40]. This compound was previously isolated and characterized in this plant by Seo et al. [47].
Cirsiliol (Peak 27) and its isomer (Peak 28) were putatively identified at tR = 12.50 and 12.66 min, based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 329.0672 and its fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 314.0419 [M-H-15]−, due to the loss of CH3, m/z 299.0198 [M-H-30]− due to the loss of CH2O and m/z 285.0399 [M-H-44]− due to the loss of C2H4O [40].
At deprotonated molecule [M-H]− m/z 343.0823 with tR = 12.96 min, a compound named 8,3′-dihydroxy-7,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavone (Peak 32) was identified with three characteristic fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 327.0524 [M-H-16]−, 313.0357 [M-H-30]−, and 256.9828 [M-H-86]−. These ions produced, due to the loss of CH4, CH2O and C4H6O2, respectively [46]. Previously, 8,3′-dihydroxy-7,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavone was isolated and characterized in this plant species by Kaneda et al. [46].
Dimethoxyhydroxyflavanone (Peak 33) and its isomer (Peak 36) were identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 299.0196 at tR = 13.31 and 13.47 min. This ion later produced four fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 284.0326 [M-H-15]− due to the loss of CH3, m/z 269.0457 [M-H-30]− due to the loss of CH2O, m/z 255.0300 [M-H-44]− due to the loss of CO2, and m/z 239.0348 [M-H-60]− due to the loss of C3H8O [40].
Kievitone (Peak 38) was identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 355.1038 at tR = 13.67 min, which later produced three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 285.0984 [M-H-70]− with the loss of C3H2O2, m/z 255.0656 [M-H-100]− with the loss of C4H4O3, and m/z 241.1012 [M-H-114]− with the loss of C6H10O2 [48].
Additionally, 6-Hydroxyflavanone (Peak 43) was identified at tR = 14.61 min. This compound gives out a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 239.0713 and three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 211.0628 [M-H-28]−, 197.0602 [M-H-42]−, and 136.0112 [M-H-103]−. These fragmentations occurred due to the loss of CO, C2H2O, and C8H7, respectively [40]. The presence of this compound was confirmed with the available standards.
At tR = 14.98 min, with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 393.3017, which later produced three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 375.2910 [M-H-18]−, m/z 361.2715 [M-H-32]− and m/z 353.2982 [M-H-40]− was identified as trihydroxydiprenylisoflavan (Peak 44), as this fragmentation occurred due to the loss of H2O, CH4O, and C3H4, respectively [49].
Next, 3-hydroxy-3′,4′-dimethoxyflavone (Peak 60) and its isomer (Peak 61) were identified putatively at tR = 16.86 and 17.02 min. This compound give out to a deprotonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 299.0925, which later produced three significant fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 283.0610 [M+H-16]+, 267.0578 [M+H-32]+, and 237.0548 [M+H-62]+. Each of which occurred due to the loss of one oxygen moiety, loss of CH4O, and loss of C2H6O2, respectively [40]. Additionally, 3-hydroxy-3′,4′-dimethoxyflavone was isolated and elucidated from the leaves of M. calabura by Sufian et al. [12].
At tR = 3.66 and 3.82 min, myricitrin (Peak 49) and its isomer (Peak 50) were identified with deprotonated molecule [M+H]+ at m/z 465.1050, produced three significant fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 447.3480 [M+H-18]+, 303.0513 [M+H-162]+, and 285.0772 [M+H-180]+. These fragmentations occur due to the loss of H2O, C6H10O5, and C6H12O6, respectively [40].

2.2.8. Anthocyanin

Myrtillin (Peak 8) and its isomer (Peak 9) were identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 464.8049 at tR = 4.05 and 4.21 min, which later produced three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 286.9921 [M-H-78]−, 299.0193 [M-H-166]−, and 178.9979 [M-H-286]−. These fragmentations occurred due to the loss of C3H10O2, C6H14O5, and C15H10O6, respectively [40]. This compound was isolated and characterized by Harborne et al. [50] in this plant.

2.2.9. Chalcone

At tR = 10.16 and 12.73 min, chalcone compounds were identified based on its deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 255.0662 and the similar fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 227.0477 [M-H-28]− due to the loss of C2H4, m/z 213.0526 [M-H-42]− due to the loss of C2H2O, and m/z 187.0655 [M-H-68]− due to the loss of C4H4O. These compounds were identified as isoliquiritigenin (Peak 15) and its isomers (Peak 31) [51]. Isoliquiritigenin was previously isolated and characterized by Hsu et al. [51] in M. calabura species.

2.2.10. Quinone Derivatives

Six different quinone derivatives and their isomers, named arbutin, rhein, and lapachol, were tentatively identified throughout the spectrum. At tR = 10.80 and 10.96 min, arbutin (Peak 19) and its isomer (Peak 20) with a deprotonated molecule [M-H]− at m/z 271.0613 and three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 253.0507 [M-H-18]−, 197.0603 [M-H-74]−, and 161.0600 [M-H-110]− due to the loss of H2O, C3H6O2, and C6H6O2, respectively [52]. Rhein (Peak 35) and its isomers were tentatively identified at tR = 13.45, 13.92, and 14.23 min, with its deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 282.9547 and three fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 267.0296 [M-H-16]− with the loss of CH4, 239.0353 [M-H-48]− with the loss of CH4O2, and 211.0396 [M-H-72]− with the loss of C3H4O2 [53]. While lapachol (Peak 42) was identified at tR = 14.38 min, with its deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 240.9106, and three fragmentation ions at MS/MS analysis at m/z 223.0756 [M-H-18]−, 198.1011 [M-H-43]−, and 186.0566 [M-H-55]− due to the loss of H2O, C2H3O, and C4H7, respectively [54].

2.2.11. Lactone Derivatives

One lactone derivative named yangonin (Peak 29) and its isomer (Peak 34) were identified at tR = 12.71 and 13.40 min with deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 257.0644. Three similar fragmentation ions in MS/MS analysis includes m/z 239.0710 [M-H-18]− (loss of H2O), 213.0919 [M-H-44]− (loss of CO2), and 197.0815 [M-H-60]− (loss of C2H4O2) [50].

2.2.12. Terpene Glycoside

Geniposide (Peak 10) with a deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 387.1145 was identified at tR = 6.34 min, with three MS/MS fragmentation ions at m/z 284.0327 [M-H-103]−, 255.0298 [M-H-132]−, and 224.8609 [M-H-162]−. These signals, respectively, corresponded to the loss of C4H7O3, C5H8O4, and C6H10O5 [55]. Identification of this compound was confirmed by using the authentic standard.

2.2.13. Alkaloid Derivatives

Two alkaloid derivatives identified were piceatannol galloylglucoside (Peak 26) with deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 557.1458 and narceinone (Peak 47) with deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 457.9947 at tR = 12.36 and 16.18 min, respectively. Piceatannol galloylglucoside (Peak 26) give out to four fragmentations ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 301.1331 [M-H-256]− (loss of C11H12O7), 285.0776 [M-H-272]− (loss of C11H12O8), 257.3555 [M-H-300]− (loss of C16H12O6), and 201.0187 [M-H-356]− (loss of C15H16O10), while narceinone (Peak 47) give out to three fragmentations ions in MS/MS analysis at m/z 427.9972 [M-H-30]−, 397.9993 [M-H-59]−, and 367.9799 [M-H-90]− due to the loss of CH2O, C2H3O2, and C2H2O4, respectively [56,57].

2.2.14. Sugar

Sucrose (Peak 2) and its dimer (Peak 1) were identified at tR = 0.94 and 0.81 min, respectively with deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 341.1090 and 683.2253. They share a similar fragmentations pattern in MS/MS analysis at m/z 179.0555 [M-H-162]− (loss of C6H10O5), 161.0443 [M-H-180]− (loss of glucose moiety), and 143.0345 [M-H-198]− (loss of C6H14O7) [40].

2.2.15. Ellagitannin Derivative

Corilagin (Peak 5) was tentatively identified at tR = 1.39 min with deprotonated molecule at [M-H]− at m/z 633.0735. The three fragmentations pattern in MS/MS analysis were shown at m/z 481.1787 [M-H-152]− (loss of C7H4O4), 313.0568 [M-H-320]− (loss of C14H8O9), and 169.0137 [M-H-164]− (loss of C20H16O13) [58].
Table
Table 2. Tentative identification of compounds present in M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol.
Table 2. Tentative identification of compounds present in M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol.
Peak NotRUV λ-MaxMFExact Mass(M-H)−(M+H)+Mass ErrorMS/MS Fragment IonsTentative IdentificationReferences
10.81210, 274, 350, 370NDND683.2253−ND341.1091, 179.0554, 161.0447, 143.0340Sucrose dimer[40]
20.94210, 272, 350, 370C12H22O11342.1162341.1090−0.0072179.0555, 161.0443, 143.0345Sucrose[40]
31.24208, 266, 292, 350, 370C15H14O7306.0740305.0668−0.0072289.0642, 245.0440, 219.0657, 167.0341Epigallocatechin[40]
41.36210, 272C19H18O7358.1053357.1195−−0.0142270.8385, 224.8610, 179.05863′-Hydroxy-7,8,4′,5′-tetramethoxyflavone *[46]
51.39208, 216, 276, 270C27H22O18634.0806633.0735−0.0071481.1787, 313.0568, 169.0137Corilagin[58]
61.40208, 274C15H14O7306.0740305.0668−0.0072289.0233, 245.0284, 219.0655, 167.0338Gallocatechin[40]
72.42208, 356C20H20O7372.1209371.0986−0.0223296.8684, 240.8795, 231.05067,8,3′,4′,5′-Pentamethoxyflavone *[46]
84.05206, 256, 350C21H21O12465.1033464.8049−−0.7016386.9921, 299.0193, 178.9979Myrtillin *[40]
94.21206, 258, 350C21H21O12465.1033464.8049−−0.7016386.9907, 298.9871, 178.9980Myrtillin isomer[40]
106.34210, 272, 350, 370C17H24O10388.1369387.1145−0.0224284.0327, 255.0298, 224.8609Geniposide #[40]
118.70222, 272C26H30O6438.2042437.0466−0.1576296.8747, 288.7813, 242.8798Hiravanone *[47]
129.43222, 274C30H26O13594.1373593.1304−0.0069447.0935, 429.0823, 285.0404Buddlenoid A *[41]
139.49222, 268, 314NDND1187.2678−ND593.1306, 447.0932, 429.0825, 285.0408Buddlenoid A dimer[41]
149.75222, 268, 296, 374C30H26O13594.1373593.1304−0.0069447.0919, 429.0820, 285.0406Buddlenoid A isomer[41]
1510.16222, 280C15H12O4256.0736255.0662−0.0074227.0477, 213.0526, 187.0655Isoliquiritigenin *[51]
1610.47222, 294C16H14O6302.0790301.0721−0.0069286.0490, 269.0465, 211.04753,5,8-Trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone *[16]
1710.63224, 286C16H14O6302.0790301.0721−0.0069286.0489, 269.0461, 211.0474Trihydroxymethoxyflavanone isomer[16]
1810.78222, 294C16H14O6302.0790301.0721−0.0069286.0492, 269.0452, 211.0475Trihydroxymethoxyflavanone isomer[16]
1910.80222, 294C12H16O7272.0896271.0613−0.0283253.0507, 197.0603, 161.0600Arbutin[52]
2010.96224, 276, 296, 376C12H16O7272.0896271.0613−0.0283253.0509, 197.0603, 161.0600Arbutin isomer[52]
2111.02224, 282C21H20O11448.1006447.2237−−0.1231301.1495, 285.2063, 245.0717Quercitrin #[40]
2211.13224, 290, 298C15H10O3238.0630237.0555−0.0075209.0591, 160.0157Hydroxyflavone[40]
2311.17224, 306C21H20O11448.1006447.2237−−0.1231301.0923, 285.0311, 245.0662Quercitrin isomer[40]
2411.87224, 282C15H10O6286.0477285.0401−0.0076269.0448, 216.9897, 119.0491Kaempferol #[40]
2512.30224, 270, 292, 312C25H28O6424.1886423.0928−0.0958353.2442, 287.6386, 251.09236,8-Diprenyleriodictyol *[47]
2612.36224, 290C27H26O13558.4875557.1458−0.3417301.1331, 285.0776, 257.3555, 201.0187Piceatannol galloylglucoside[57]
2712.50224, 286C17H14O7330.0740329.0672−0.0068314.0419, 299.0198, 285.0399Cirsiliol[40]
2812.66224, 292, 376C17H14O7330.0740329.0670−0.0070314.0435, 299.0198, 285.0421Cirsiliol isomer[40]
2912.71224, 292, 376C15H14O4258.0892257.0644−0.0248239.0710, 213.0919, 197.0815Yangonin[50]
3012.72224, 292, 376C27H28O14576.1479575.1748−−0.0269513.0697, 341.1581, 269.1393, 231.1236Vitexin hydroxymethylglutarate[43]
3112.73224, 282, 332, 374C15H12O4256.0736255.0662−0.0074227.0711, 213.0549, 187.0634Isoliquiritigenin isomer[51]
3212.96224, 332, 374C18H16O7344.0896343.0823−0.0073327.0524, 313.0357, 256.98288,3′-Dihydroxy-7,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavone *[46]
3313.31224, 280, 378C17H16O5300.0998299.0196−0.0802284.0326, 269.0457, 255.0300, 239.0348Dimethoxyhydroxyflavanone[40]
3413.40218, 274, 366C15H14O4258.0892257.0644−0.0248239.0712, 213.0915, 197.0597Yangonin isomer[50]
3513.45224, 272, 360, 374C15H8O6284.0321282.9547−0.0774267.0296, 239.0353, 211.0396Rhein[53]
3613.47222, 268, 312, 360C17H16O5300.0998299.0196−0.0802284.0326, 269.0816, 255.0304, 239.0346Dimethoxyhydroxyflavanone isomer[40]
3713.63224, 278, 356, 376C15H12O6288.0634287.0539−0.0095271.0607, 269.0723, 216.9894, 119.0077Dihydrokaempferol[40]
3813.67224, 286, 376C20H20O6356.1260355.1038−0.0222285.0948, 255.0656, 241.1012Kievitone[48]
3913.92224, 274, 352C15H8O6284.0321282.9547−0.0774267.0282, 239.0348, 211.0397Rhein isomer[53]
4014.03224, 268, 346C17H14O6314.0790313.0719−0.0071299.0505, 285.0284, 255.0299, 227.0350, 213.0395Velutin[40]
4114.23224, 378C15H8O6284.0321282.9547−0.0774267.0306, 239.0348, 211.0396Rhein isomer[53]
4214.38224, 286, 362, 376C15H14O3242.0943240.9106−0.1837223.0756, 198.1011, 186.0566Lapachol[54]
4314.61224, 376C15H12O3240.0786239.0713−0.0073211.0628, 197.0602, 136.01126-Hydroxyflavanone #[40]
4414.98226, 274, 312, 378C25H30O4394.5033393.3017−0.2016375.2910, 361.2715, 353.2982Trihydroxydiprenylisoflavan[49]
4515.01220, 274, 316C17H14O6314.0790313.0719−0.0071299.0490, 285.0284, 255.0299, 227.0336, 213.0398Velutin isomer[40]
4615.19224, 270, 326, 374C17H14O6314.0790313.0719−0.0071299.0466, 285.0287, 255.0299, 227.0347, 213.0396Velutin isomer[40]
4716.18216, 270C23H25NO9459.4459457.9947−0.4512427.9972, 397.9993, 367.9799Narceinone[56]
481.68208, 274C15H14O6290.0790−291.06400.0150244.9747, 207.0665, 139.0396Catechin[40]
493.66208, 254, 356, 376C21H20O12464.0955−465.1050−0.0095447.3480, 303.0513, 285.0772Myricitrin[40]
503.82208, 254, 356, 376C21H20O12464.0955−465.1050−0.0095447.3459, 303.0511, 285.0771Myricitrin isomer[40]
519.68222, 296, 374, 386C22H18O11458.0849−459.0942−0.0093321.0591, 289.0771, 275.0818Epigallocatechin gallate[40]
5212.58222, 294, 344, 378C16H12O7316.0583−317.0671−0.0088301.0973, 285.0734, 245.1063Rhamnetin[40]
5313.00226, 292, 326C22H22O9430.1260−431.1330−0.0070269.1334, 254.0331, 227.0704, 213.0568, 201.0357Ononin[40]
5413.13224, 274, 376C15H10O4254.0579−255.0661−0.0082227.0694, 213.0553, 200.9240Daidzein #[40]
5513.29224, 280, 378C15H10O4254.0579−255.0661−0.0082227.0668, 213.0560, 200.9234Daidzein isomer[40]
5614.38224, 282, 356, 378C15H10O5270.0528−271.0611−0.0083254.0868, 227.0920, 213.0558, 201.06503′-Hydroxydaidzein *[44]
5714.78224, 338C15H10O5270.0528−271.0611−0.0083254.0666, 227.0918, 213.0557, 201.0810Hydroxydaidzein isomer[44]
5816.13226, 272, 378C16H12O4268.0736−269.0819−0.0083254.0582, 227.0666, 213.0548, 201.0915Formononetin #[40]
5916.29226, 266, 290, 354, 376C16H12O4268.0736−269.0819−0.0083254.0583, 227.0669, 213.0546, 201.0601Formononetin isomer[40]
6016.86226, 270C17H14O5298.0841−299.0925−0.0084283.0610, 267.0578, 237.05483-Hydroxy-3′,4′-dimethoxyflavone *[40]
6117.02226C17H14O5298.0841−299.0925−0.0084283.0611, 267.0571, 237.0637Hydroxydimethoxyflavone isomer[40]
tR = retention time; MF = molecular formula; * Indicate the compounds previously isolated from M. calabura; # indicated the compounds that were confirmed with the authentic standard.

2.3. UHPLC Absolute Quantification

Six standard compounds named geniposide, daidzein, quercitrin, kaempferol, formononetin, and 6-hydroxyflavanone that were previously identified by using UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS technique, were subjected to UHPLC quantification to determine the absolute amount of each standard in the most active extract. The result in Table 3 shows the metabolites content in FD M. calabura leaves extracted with 50% ethanol, ranging from 56.58 ± 0.28 to 650.01 ± 0.12 µg/mg of extract. The highest contents of metabolites in the extract were in the following order geniposide, daidzein, quercitrin, 6-hydroxyflavanone, kaempferol, and formononetin.
Each of these metabolites may contribute to the anti-hyperglycemic effect of M. calabura leaves. For example, geniposide plays an important role in reducing glycogenolysis process through impairment of hepatic glycogen phosphorylase and glucose-6-phosphatase activity, as well as their protein expression in high fat diet-streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic mice [18]. On the other hand, daidzein helps to increase the mRNA level in the β-cells to exert more insulin production, as well as restoring the glucose metabolic enzyme activities in daidzein-supplemented non-obese diabetic mice [19]. In addition, one of the quercetin derivatives has proven to have a protective effect on the intact β-cells of the islets of Langerhans by inhibiting lipid peroxidation, as well as its ability to scavenge free radicals from STZ-induced oxidative stress in STZ-induced diabetic rats [20]. Although no research has been conducted regarding the proficiency of 6-hydroxyflavanone on directly reducing the blood glucose level, there are some studies that have demonstrated the electron donating ability of 6-hydroxyflavanone to scavenge free radicals induced by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl in in vitro antioxidant study [21,59]. Besides that, kaempferol, another flavonoid-type compound that was identified and quantified, also reportedly shows hypoglycemic effect by lowering the levels of glycoprotein in the liver and increment of insulin production, as well as enhancement of glucose utilization in STZ-induced rats [22]. Formononetin helps in the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-γ) genes in liver, which, in turn, regulates the blood glucose level, the cell surface receptor protein (FAS) may not induce the cleavage of SREBP-1C site in stimulating lipid synthesis due to an antagonistic interaction between formononetin and PPAR-γ genes [23]. Therefore, these identified metabolites were quantified based on its positive attributes in lowering the blood glucose level, either through in vivo or in vitro study, that could potentially influenced the hypoglycemic aptitude of M. calabura leaves.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

LCMS grade formic acid, methanol, acetonitrile, water, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), sodium phosphate buffer, and absolute ethanol were supplied by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Other chemicals including p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranose (PNPG), α-glucosidase enzyme, α-amylase enzyme, glycine, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), potato starch, and sodium phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All the standard compounds including acarbose, quercetin, daidzein, quercitrin, kaempferol, formononetin, 6-hydroxyflavanone, and geniposide were purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) with >98% purity.

3.2. Plant Materials

The fresh M. calabura were harvested from Universiti Putra Malaysia’s Mosque. Number of voucher specimen (SK 3345/18) was deposited by a botanist (Dr. Mohd Firdaus Ismail) in the herbarium of Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia. The leaves of five different trees of M. calabura were harvested and separated into three drying processes, namely oven-drying (OD), air-drying (AD), and freeze-drying (FD). The fresh leaves were assigned at 40 °C in a convention oven (Protech, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia), for a duration of 10 days for OD processed leaves. On the other hand, for the AD sample, the leaves were dried at 37 °C for the duration of 2 weeks. As for the FD sample, the leaves were stored for 4 days in −80 °C freezer (Haier, Surrey, UK) prior to 3 days FD (LabConco, Kansas City, MO, USA). All samples were confirmed to absolute dryness, as their constant weight was achieved before grinding process started. The ground samples were then stored at 2–7 °C in airtight container until further analysis. Total 5 g of each ground leaves was soaked and sonicated in 100 mL of 0, 50, and 100% ethanol:water ratio, respectively, for 60 min by using ultrasonic bath sonicator (Kudos, Shanghai, China). The Whatman filter paper no. 1 was used to filter the mixture and the filtered mixture was concentrated under controlled temperature at 40 °C by using a rotatory evaporator (Buchi LaboratoriumsTechnik, Flawil, Switzerland). To ensure complete dryness, all extracts were then lyophilized in a freeze dryer (LabConco, Kansas City, MO, USA) and subsequently stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

3.3. In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Activity

3.3.1. α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

The α-glucosidase inhibition activity assay has been conducted according to the demonstrated method with modifications [60]. The PNPG in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) has been used as the substrate, which was comparable to the intestinal fluid. Next, sample extracts were prepared at 200 μg/mL and 6 serial dilutions were done. In the 96-well plate, a reaction consisting of 130 μL of 30 mM phosphate buffer, 10 μL of enzyme, and 10 μL of extracts was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. Then, 50 μL of substrate was added in the reaction and was further incubated at 37 °C for another 15 min. Next, 50 μL of 2 M glycine (pH 10) was then added to stop the reaction. The absorbance was measured by using a spectrophotometer (Spectramax PLUS, San Jose, CA, USA) at 405 nm wavelength. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was calculated using the equation; [(An − As)/An] × 100%, where An is the difference in absorbance of the negative control and all the blanks, and As is the difference in absorbance of the sample and all the blanks. The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was expressed as IC50 value (μg/mL) to represent M. calabura extract concentration that was needed to inhibit the enzyme activity by 50%. Quercetin was tested and used as positive control.

3.3.2. α-Amylase Inhibition Assay

The α-amylase inhibition activity assay was carried out based on the demonstrated method with modifications [32]. In a 96-well plate, a reaction mixture containing 50 μL of 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.8, 10 μL of 2 U/mL porcine α–amylase, and 20 μL of varying concentrations of the extract (0.04, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 mg/mL) was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Then, 20 μL of substrate (1% starch dissolved in 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.8) was added, and the mixture was further incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction was then stopped by adding 100 μL of the DNS color reagent and boiled for 10 min. The absorbance was measured by using a spectrophotometer (Spectramax PLUS, San Jose, CA, USA) at 540 nm wavelength. The α-amylase inhibitory activity has been calculated using the equation; [(An − As)/An] × 100%, where An is the difference in absorbance of the negative control and all the blanks, and As is the difference in absorbance of the sample and all the blanks. The α-amylase inhibitory activity was expressed as IC50 (μg/mL). Acarbose was tested and employed as a positive control in each plate of α-amylase activity.

3.4. UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

The sample preparation for UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis was prepared based on the reported method with modifications [36]. The most active extract (4 mg) was dissolved in 2 mL of LCMS-grade methanol and filtered through a 0.22 µm filter prior to 20.0 µL injection to the UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. The analysis was performed using an Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC coupled with Q Exactive™ Focus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a binary pump, vacuum degasser, temperature-controlled autosampler, diode array detector (200–600 nm range; 5 nm bandwidth), and a heated electrospray ionization source. The separation was conducted on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm) (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA). The gradient solvent system was then commenced from 95:5–0:100 (v/v) of water with 0.1% formic acid: acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid over 39 min, with a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. Negative and positive ion modes were acquired and recorded on Q Exactive™ Focus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The MSn analytical conditions were as follows: spray volt-pressure −3.6 kV; equipment temperature, 37.8 °C; capillary temperature, 300 °C; auxiliary gas at 8 units; sheath gas at 50 units; scan range m/z 150–1200, data acquisition frequency at 12 Hz, and collision-induced dissociation energy was adjusted to 30%. The data was recorded and processed using the Thermo Xcalibur Qual Browser software 4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).

3.5. Absolute Quantification from FD Leaves Extracted with 50% Ethanol by UHPLC

The most active extract was also subjected to absolute quantification for several phenolics named daidzein, quercitrin, kaempferol, formononetin, and 6-hydroxyflavanone, as well as a terpene glycoside, geniposide. The sample preparation for UHPLC analysis was according to the reported method with slight adjustment [36]. The active extract (10 mg) of the M. calabura was dissolved in 2 mL of LCMS-grade methanol and filtered through a 0.22 µm filter prior to 2.0 µL injection to the UHPLC analysis. The analysis was performed using a Waters Acquity UHPLC (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a binary pump, vacuum degasser, temperature-controlled autosampler, column heater, and 2998 photodiode array (PDA) detector (200–600 nm range; 5 nm bandwidth). The separation was conducted on a Waters Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm) (Waters Corp, Milfor, MA, USA) with the same gradient solvent system mentioned in profiling section, where the gradient solvent system was commenced from 95:5–0:100 (v/v) of water with 0.1% FA:acetonitrile with 0.1% FA over 39 min with a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. The detection wavelength was set at 254 nm. The data was evaluated and processed by using the Waters Empower Chromatography Data System software. The metabolite contents in the plant extract were calculated, based on the area under the peak, and expressed as µg/mg of plant extract.
The quantification method was validated according to International Council of Harmonization (ICH) tripartite guidelines [61] based on the following criteria:
  • Specificity: the retention time of the standards and extract are complementary with no contaminants or impurities detected in the eluent, with the equal volume (2.0 µL) of sample, standards, and solvent injected into the chromatography system.
  • Repeatability precision: all the relative standard deviation (RSD) were <2%, indicating high precision. The repeatability precision test was acquired by three-times injections at three concentration levels (5, 20, and 40 µg/mL) for each standard (daidzein, quercitrin, kaempferol, formononetin, 6-hydroxyflavanone, and geniposide).
  • Linearity and range: the calibration curve was obtained by three data points at 5, 20, and 40 µg/mL. Each calibration curve was determined by the averaging triplicate value of each concentration. Table 4 shows the concentration range, regression equation, and correlation coefficient (R2).
  • Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined by calculating the signal:noise ratio, established at 3.3:1 (LOD) and 10:1 (LOQ), based on the calibration curve with the following formula:
    LOD = (SD × 3.3)/M
    LOQ = (SD × 10)/M
    where SD is the standard deviation of the response, and M is the slope of calibration curve. Table 4 demonstrates the LOD and LOQ value for the six tested standards.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The results of the five biological replicates were expressed in mean ± standard deviation. The statistical analysis was done by using Minitab software (Version 16, Minitab Inc, State College, PA, USA), while the significant difference in the results was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey pairwise multiple-comparisons test (p < 0.05, significant).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, M. calabura leaves, extracted with 50% ethanol and dried by using FD method, were revealed to be the best condition to extract the anti-diabetic metabolites. A total of sixty-one compounds were tentatively identified in the active extract by using UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS technique, including five catechin derivatives, five types of kaempferol derivatives, three types of quercetin derivatives, one apigenin derivative compound, three types of luteolin derivatives, seven types of daidzein derivatives, nineteen types of other flavonoids, two types of anthocyanin compounds, two types of chalcone compounds, six types of quinone derivatives, two types of lactones derivatives, two types of alkaloid derivatives, two types of sugar, one terpene glycoside, and one ellagitannins derivative. The highest contents of metabolites in the active extract were in the following order: geniposide, daidzein, quercitrin, 6-hydroxyflavanone, kaempferol, and formononetin. Hence, this study suggests that, with the incorporation of the FD method, M. calabura leaves when extracted with 50% ethanol, can play a significant role as a potential for the development of naturally derived herbal medicinal components that not only help to inhibit diabetes related complications but also impedes toxic side effects of synthetic anti-diabetic drugs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A., N.S.R. and A.A.; methodology, F.A. and N.K.Z.Z.; software, N.K.Z.Z.; validation, F.A. and N.K.Z.Z.; formal analysis, N.K.Z.Z.; investigation, N.K.Z.Z.; resources, F.A.; data curation, N.K.Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, N.K.Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.A. and N.K.Z.Z.; visualization, F.A.; supervision, F.A., N.S.R. and A.A.; project administration, F.A.; funding acquisition, F.A., N.S.R. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universiti Putra Malaysia, (UPM/700/2/1/GPB/2017/9597400) provided under Putra High Impact Grant Scheme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available within this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia for providing the facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Moini, J. Pathophysiology of diabetes. In Epidemiology of Diabetes; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 25–43. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rajendiran, D.; Packirisamy, S.; Gunasekaran, K. A review on role of antioxidants in diabetes. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2018, 11, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chandran, A.; Abdullah, M.N.; Abdul, F. National Diabetes Registry Report 2013–2019; Ministry of Health Malaysia: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2019; pp. 1–34.
  4. Janani, C.; Kumari, B.D.R. PPAR gamma gene—A review. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2014, 9, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sola, D.; Rossi, L.; Piero, G.; Schianca, C.; Maffioli, P.; Bigliocca, M.; Mella, R.; Corlianò, F.; Fra, G.P.; Bartoli, E.; et al. Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice. Arch. Med. Sci. 2015, 4, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thrasher, J. Pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Available therapies. Am. J. Med. 2017, 130, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Herman, G.A.; Stevens, C.; Van Dyck, K.; Bergman, A.; Yi, B.; De Smet, M.; Snyder, K.; Hilliard, D.; Tanen, M.; Tanaka, W.; et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sitagliptin, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV, in healthy subjects: Results from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with single oral doses. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 78, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murai, A.; Iwamura, K.; Takada, M.; Ogawa, K.; Usui, T.; Okumura, J.I. Control of postprandial hyperglycaemia by galactosyl maltobionolactone and its novel anti-amylase effect in mice. Life Sci. 2002, 71, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tuomilehto, J.; Pohjola, M.; Lindström, J.; Aro, A. Acarbose and nutrient intake in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1994, 26, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohamad-Yusof, M.I.; Salleh, M.Z.; Kek, T.L.; Ahmat, N.; Nik-Azmin, N.F.; Zakaria, Z.A. Activity-guided isolation of bioactive constituents with antinociceptive activity from Muntingia calabura L. leaves using the formalin test. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 715074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Balan, T.; Sani, M.H.M.; Mumtaz-Ahmad, S.H.; Suppaiah, V.; Mohtarrudin, N.; Zakaria, Z.A. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities contribute to the prophylactic effect of semi-purified fractions obtained from the crude methanol extract of Muntingia calabura leaves against gastric ulceration in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 164, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sufian, A.S.; Ramasamy, K.; Ahmat, N.; Zakaria, Z.A.; Yusof, M.I.M. Isolation and identification of antibacterial and cytotoxic compounds from the leaves of Muntingia calabura L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zakaria, Z.A.; Mohamed, A.M.; Mohd-Jamil, N.S.; Rofiee, M.S.; Hussain, M.K.; Sulaiman, M.R.; Teh, L.K.; Salleh, M.Z. In vitro antiproliferative and antioxidant activities of the extracts of Muntingia calabura leaves. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2011, 39, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aligita, W.; Susilawati, E.; Sukmawati, I.K.; Holidayanti, L.; Riswanti, J. Antidiabetic activities of Muntingia calabura L. leaves water extract in type 2 diabetes mellitus animal models. Indones. Biomed. J. 2018, 10, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, J.; Lin, R.W.; Du, C.Y.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, I.S. Flavones and cytotoxic constituents from the stem bark of Muntingia calabura. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2004, 51, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Su, B.; Jung, E.; Schunke, J.; Graham, J.G.; Cabieses, F.; Fong, H.H.S.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D. Activity-guided isolation of the chemical constituents of Muntingia calabura using a quinone reductase induction assay. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zakaria, Z.A.; Nor Hazalin, N.A.M.; Zaid, S.N.H.M.; Ghani, M.A.; Hassan, M.H.; Gopalan, H.K.; Sulaiman, M.R. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects of Muntingia calabura aqueous extract in animal models. J. Nat. Med. 2007, 61, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, S.Y.; Wang, G.F.; Liu, Z.Q.; Rao, J.J.; Lü, L.; Xu, W.; Wu, S.G.; Zhang, J.J. Effect of geniposide, a hypoglycemic glucoside, on hepatic regulating enzymes in diabetic mice induced by a high-fat diet and streptozotoci. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Choi, M.S.; Jung, U.J.; Yeo, J.; Kim, M.J.; Lee, M.K. Genistein and daidzein prevent diabetes onset by elevating insulin level and altering hepatic gluconeogenic and lipogenic enzyme activities in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2008, 24, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Babujanarthanam, R.; Kavitha, P.; Pandian, M.R. Quercitrin, a bioflavonoid improves glucose homeostasis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic tissues by altering glycolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2010, 24, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mikell, J.R.; Herath, W.; Khan, I.A. Eleven microbial metabolites of 6-hydroxyflavanone. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 63, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chandramohan, G.; Al-numair, K.S.; Alsaif, M.A.; Veeramani, C. Antidiabetic effect of kaempferol a flavonoid compound, on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats with special reference to glycoprotein components. Prog. Nutr. 2015, 17, 50–57. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vishnuvathan, V.J.; Karunanidhi, S.L.; Srividya, A.R. Medicinal uses of formononetin-A review. J. Ethnobiol. Tradit. Med. 2016, 126, 1197–1209. [Google Scholar]
  24. Abu-Bakar-Sajak, A.; Abas, F.; Ismail, A.; Khatib, A. Effect of different drying treatments and solvent ratios on phytochemical constituents of Ipomoea aquatica and correlation with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 2817–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Singh, R.P.; Heldman, D.R. Packaging concepts. In Introduction to Food Engineering; Taylor, S.L., Ed.; Elsevier: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013; Volume 84, pp. 745–769. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mediani, A.; Abas, F.; Maulidiani, M.; Shaari, K.; Choi, Y.H.; Lajis, N.H. 1H-NMR-based metabolomics approach to understanding the drying effects on the phytochemicals in Cosmos caudatus. Food Res. Int. 2012, 49, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Azizan, A.; Ahamad-Bustamam, M.S.; Maulidiani, M.; Shaari, K.; Ismail, I.S.; Nagao, N.; Abas, F. Metabolite profiling of the microalgal diatom Chaetoceros alcitrans and correlation with antioxidant and nitric oxide inhibitory activities via 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. De-Sales, P.M.; De-Souza, P.M.; Simeoni, L.A.; Magalhães, P.D.O.; Silveira, D. α-Amylase inhibitors: A review of raw material and isolated compounds from plant source. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 15, 141–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Matsui, T.; Yoshimoto, C.; Osajima, K.; Oki, T.; Osajima, Y. In vitro survey of α–glucosidase inhibitory food components. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 2019–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lv, J.; Li, G. A colorimetric method for α-glucosidase activity assay and its inhibitor screening based on aggregation of gold nanoparticles induced by specific recognition between phenylenediboronic acid and 4-aminophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Keharom, S.; Mahachai, R.; Chanthai, S. The optimization study of α-amylase activity based on central composite design-response surface methodology by dinitrosalicylic acid method. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  32. Telagari, M.; Hullatti, K. In-vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of Adiantum caudatum Linn. and Celosia argentea Linn. extracts and fractions. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2015, 47, 425–429. [Google Scholar]
  33. Spigno, G.; Tramelli, L.; Faveri, D.M. De Effects of extraction time, temperature and solvent on concentration and antioxidant activity of grape marc phenolics. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tapani, E.; Taavitsainen, M.; Lindros, K.; Vehmas, T.; Lehtonen, E. Toxicity of ethanol in low concentrations: Experimental evaluation in cell culture. Acta Radiol. 1996, 37, 923–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chan, E.W.C.; Lim, Y.Y.; Wong, S.K.; Lim, K.K.; Tan, S.P.; Lianto, F.S.; Yong, M.Y. Effects of different drying methods on the antioxidant properties of leaves and tea of ginger species. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khoo, L.W.; Mediani, A.; Zolkeflee, N.K.Z.; Leong, S.W.; Ismail, I.S.; Khatib, A.; Shaari, K.; Abas, F. Phytochemical diversity of Clinacanthus nutans extracts and their bioactivity correlations elucidated by NMR based metabolomics. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 14, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.Y.; Abas, F.; Khatib, A.; Ismail, I.S.; Shaari, K.; Zawawi, N. Metabolite profiling of Neptunia oleracea and correlation with antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities using 1H NMR-based metabolomics. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 16, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nakbanpote, W.; Ruttanakorn, M.; Sukadeetad, K.; Sakkayawong, N.; Damrianant, S. Effects of drying and extraction methods on phenolic compounds and in vitro assays of Eclipta prostrata Linn. leaf extracts. Sci. Asia 2019, 45, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Slatnar, A.; Klancar, U.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Effect of drying of figs (Ficus carica L.) on the contents of sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 11696–11702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Horai, H.; Arita, M.; Kanaya, S.; Nihei, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Suwa, K.; Ojima, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, S.; Aoshima, K.; et al. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 45, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kubo, I.; Yokokawa, Y. Two tyrosinase inhibiting flavonol glycosides from Buddleia coriacea. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 1075–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nshimo, C.M.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Farnsworth, N.R. Cytotoxic constituents of Muntingia calabura leaves and stems collected in Thailand. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1993, 31, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, C.S.; Koh, H.S.; Fukami, H.; Irie, R. Antifeedants of finger millet, Eleusine coracana GAERTN, against brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yang, R.; Lan, Y.; Huang, Z.; Shao, C.; Liang, H. Isoflavonoids from Sophora tonkinensis. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2012, 48, 674–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Matsuda, H.; Morikawa, T.; Xu, F.; Ninomiya, K.; Yoshikawa, M. New isoflavones and pterocarpane with hepatoprotective activity from the stems of Erycibe expansa. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 1201–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kaneda, N.; Prezzuto, J.M.; Soejarto, D.D.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Farnsworth, N.R. Plant anticancer agents, XLVIII. New cytotoxic flavonoids from Muntingia calabura roots. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seo, E.K.; Silva, G.L.; Chai, H.B.; Chagwedra, T.E.; Farnsworth, N.R.; Cordell, G.A.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D. Cytotoxic prenylated flavanones from Monotes engleri. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ingham, J.L. Systematic aspects of phytoalexin formation within tribe phaseoleae of the Leguminosae (subfamily Papilionoideae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990, 18, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fukai, T.; Shen, C.B.; Horikoshi, T.; Nomura, T. Isoprenylated flavonoids from underground parts of Glycyrrhia glabra. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Puri, B.; Hall, A. Phytochemical Dictionary: A Handbook of Bioactive Compounds from Plants; Baxter, H., Harborne, J.B., Moss, G.P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1998; 976p. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hsu, Y.L.; Kuo, P.L.; Lin, L.T.; Lin, C.C. Isoliquiritigenin inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in human hepatoma cells. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Morikawa, H.; Kasai, R.; Otsuka, H.; Hirata, E.; Shinzato, T.; Aramoto, M.; Takeda, Y. Terpenic and phenolic glycosides from leaves of Breynia officinalis Hemsl. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 1086–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zhang, B.M.; Wang, Z.B.; Xin, P.; Wang, Q.H.; Bu, H.; Kuang, H.X. Phytochemistry and pharmacology of genus Ephedra. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2018, 16, 811–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kanchanapoom, T.; Kasai, R.; Yamasaki, K. Phenolic glycosides from Markhamia stipulata. Phytochemistry 2002, 59, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liang, Z.; Yang, M.; Xu, X.; Xie, Z.; Huang, J.; Li, X.; Yang, D. Isolation and purification of geniposide, crocin-1, and geniposidic acid from the fruit of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis by high-speed counter-current chromatography. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chaudhuri, P.K.; Thakur, R.S. Narceinone, an alkaloid from Papaver somniferum. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2002–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Olatunde, O.O.; Della Tan, S.L.; Shiekh, K.A.; Benjakul, S.; Nirmal, N.P. Ethanolic guava leaf extracts with different chlorophyll removal processes: Anti-melanosis, antibacterial properties and the impact on qualities of Pacific white shrimp during refrigerated storage. Food Chem. 2021, 341, 128251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fogliani, B.; Raharivelomanana, P.; Bianchini, J.P.; Bouraïma-Madjèbi, S.; Hnawia, E. Bioactive ellagitannins from Cunonia macrophylla, an endemic Cunoniaceae from New Caledonia. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Piszcz, P.; Wozniak, M.; Asztemborska, M.; Glod, B.K. Comparative analysis of antioxidative activity of flavonoids using HPLC–ED and photometric assays. Food Anal. Methods 2014, 7, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Abd-Ghafar, S.Z.; Mediani, A.; Ramli, N.S.; Abas, F. Antioxidant, α-glucosidase, and nitric oxide inhibitory activities of Phyllanthus acidus and LC–MS/MS profile of the active extract. Food Biosci. 2018, 25, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shabir, G.A. Step-by-step analytical methods validation and protocol in the quality system compliance industry. Rev. Saude Publica 2006, 40, 951–961. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 00287 g001 550
Figure 1. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) and UV-Vis chromatogram (254 nm) (C) of M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol in negative (A) and positive ion mode (B), respectively.
Figure 1. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) and UV-Vis chromatogram (254 nm) (C) of M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol in negative (A) and positive ion mode (B), respectively.
Molecules 27 00287 g001
Molecules 27 00287 g002 550
Figure 2. The main fragmentation pathways of the catechin derivatives.
Figure 2. The main fragmentation pathways of the catechin derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g002
Molecules 27 00287 g003 550
Figure 3. The main fragmentation pathways of the kaempferol derivatives.
Figure 3. The main fragmentation pathways of the kaempferol derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g003
Molecules 27 00287 g004 550
Figure 4. The main fragmentation pathways of the quercetin derivatives.
Figure 4. The main fragmentation pathways of the quercetin derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g004
Molecules 27 00287 g005 550
Figure 5. The fragmentation pathways of the apigenin derivatives.
Figure 5. The fragmentation pathways of the apigenin derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g005
Molecules 27 00287 g006 550
Figure 6. The fragmentation pathways of the luteolin derivatives.
Figure 6. The fragmentation pathways of the luteolin derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g006
Molecules 27 00287 g007 550
Figure 7. The fragmentation pathways of the daidzein derivatives.
Figure 7. The fragmentation pathways of the daidzein derivatives.
Molecules 27 00287 g007
Table
Table 1. α-Glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activity of M. calabura leaves dried with oven-drying (OD), air-drying (AD), and freeze-drying (FD) and extracted with 0, 50, and 100% ethanol.
Table 1. α-Glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activity of M. calabura leaves dried with oven-drying (OD), air-drying (AD), and freeze-drying (FD) and extracted with 0, 50, and 100% ethanol.
Drying MethodEthanol:Water Ratioα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Assay IC50 (µg /mL)α-Amylase Inhibitory Assay IC50 (µg /mL)
OD1001.13 ± 0.13 Ba59.39 ± 2.47 Ba
500.81 ± 0.09 Ca45.77 ± 2.46 Ca
02.76 ± 0.09 Aa105.95 ± 1.57 Ac
AD1001.07 ± 0.06 Ba53.34 ± 1.64 Bb
500.59 ± 0.14 Bb35.32 ± 2.35 Cb
02.41 ± 1.00 Aa114.43 ± 2.22 Ab
FD1000.65 ± 0.04 Bb23.84 ± 1.85 Bc
500.46 ± 0.05 Bb26.39 ± 3.93 Bc
02.01 ± 0.86 Aa185.17 ± 2.11 Aa
StandardQuercetin2.15 ± 0.26−
Acarbose−0.68 ± 0.14
The IC50 values of five biological replicates are expressed as means ± standard deviation. The uppercase letter is used to demonstrate the different ethanol:water ratio for the same drying process, while the lowercase letter is used to demonstrate the varied drying process for the same ethanol:water ratio. The different superscript letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 between samples.
Table
Table 3. Concentration of metabolites in M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol.
Table 3. Concentration of metabolites in M. calabura FD leaves extracted with 50% ethanol.
MetabolitesConcentration (µg/mg of Extract)
Geniposide650.01 ± 0.12
Daidzein231.65 ± 0.31
Quercitrin223.24 ± 0.59
Kaempferol75.22 ± 0.72
Formononetin56.58 ± 0.28
6-Hydroxyflavanone196.43 ± 0.28
Table
Table 4. Linearity, LOD, and LOQ values of the UHPLC method for the standard compounds.
Table 4. Linearity, LOD, and LOQ values of the UHPLC method for the standard compounds.
StandardsConcentration Range (µg/mL)Regression EquationCorrelation Coefficient (R2)LOD (µg/mL)LOQ (µg/mL)
Daidzein5.1592–40.2551Y = 2.67 × 104X − 2.33 × 1040.9990.100.30
Quercitrin4.7603–39.9357Y = 1.83 × 104X − 2.45 × 1040.9990.040.11
Kaempferol5.4330–40.6827Y = 1.82 × 104X − 3.33 × 1040.9990.170.52
Formononetin5.1813–40.1937Y = 2.05 × 104X − 1.45 × 1040.9990.190.56
6-Hydroxyflavanone5.1507–40.1779Y = 1.58 × 104X− 4.56 × 1040.9990.030.10
Geniposide5.7511~40.7790Y = 4.16 × 103X − 6.01 × 1030.9990.320.96
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zolkeflee, N.K.Z.; Ramli, N.S.; Azlan, A.; Abas, F. In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Activities and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Profile of Muntingia calabura Leaves Extract. Molecules 2022, 27, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010287

AMA Style

Zolkeflee NKZ, Ramli NS, Azlan A, Abas F. In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Activities and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Profile of Muntingia calabura Leaves Extract. Molecules. 2022; 27(1):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zolkeflee, Nur Khaleeda Zulaikha, Nurul Shazini Ramli, Azrina Azlan, and Faridah Abas. 2022. "In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Activities and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Profile of Muntingia calabura Leaves Extract" Molecules 27, no. 1: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010287

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop