Next Article in Journal
Methylation of Cyanidin-3-O-Glucoside with Dimethyl Carbonate
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Polyanionic C5-Modified 2′-Deoxyuridine and 2′-Deoxycytidine-5′-Triphosphates and Their Properties as Substrates for DNA Polymerases
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolome-Based Discrimination Analysis of Five Lilium Bulbs Associated with Differences in Secondary Metabolites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Probing the Binding Requirements of Modified Nucleosides with the DNA Nuclease SNM1A
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Site-Specific Fluorescent Labeling of RNA Interior Positions

Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051341
by Barry S. Cooperman
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051341
Submission received: 18 January 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2021 / Accepted: 1 March 2021 / Published: 3 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nucleosides and Nucleotides)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attached PDF file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

I thank the reviewers for their favorable assessments of the manuscript. 

 

I have made all the changes suggested by reviewer 1 except for one, and I thank the reviewer for so carefully reading the manuscript. The changes are in the attached revision as indicated: 

-line 53; lines 89, 90; line 102; line 148; line 151; line 168; line 180; lines 257, 258, 259

I have not made the change suggested for line 109, because the reviewer's objection wasn't clear to me.

 

In addition, I have made the following minor changes:

-lines 30, 31;  line 102

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a useful review of a timely topic. It should be published in Molecules subject to minor revision concerning adding some missing discussion and references. In addition to the subchapters covered, the author should mention the recent works from the Srivatsan lab on

a) terminal uridinyl transferase:

https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06541

https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC05092J

b) T7 polymerase incorporation of modified NTPs + posttranscriptional modifications

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky185

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00169

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv903

and a systematic study of the substrate tolerance of T7 RNA polymerase with modified NTPs:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8OB01498A

 

 

 

 

Author Response

I thank the reviewers for their favorable assessments of the manuscript. 

 

I have not included direct references to any of the six articles suggested by reviewer 2. Although each of these articles are worthy publications, none are directly pertinent to the main thrust of the manuscript, which is articulated in the title. Moreover, five of the six are cited in the excellent review article co-authored by Professor Srivatsan, in reference (9) of the manuscript, to which the reader is directed for more information on “the introduction of fluorescent probes into RNA by chemical and/or enzymatic procedures”. The most recent article https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC05092J is not cited in reference (9), but describes a labeling procedure at the 3’-terminus of RNA, not at an interior position, and so is again not pertinent.  

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments on the manuscript “Site-specific fluorescent labeling of RNA interior positions”.

The author presents a review on the site-specific fluorescent labeling of RNA in interior positions. Different methods reported in the literature are described by the author with regard to the specific techniques and limitations. The methods described herein are useful to analyze conformational changes of RNA and to detect interactions of RNA with specific binding molecules. The manuscript is well written and easy to follow. It is of interest for scientists working in the field of nucleic acid labelling strategies.

However, introduction and conclusion should be improved. The introduction is very short and provides almost no background information. The reader should be introduced into the field more deeply.

The conclusion appears to consists of several summaries of different chapters. This is rather irritating for the reader and lacks a “take-home message”. I suggest to introduce a short summarizing section at the end of each chapter and to write a shorter conclusion including a “take-home message” for the reader.

After having made these changes, I recommend this review for publication in “Molecules”.

Author Response

I thank the reviewers for their favorable assessments of the manuscript. 

 

I disagree with the editorial judgment of the reviewer 3. This is a short article, and in my judgment is amenable to a summary at the end, rather than after each short section.

Back to TopTop