Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Bioactivity and Safety Evaluation of Ethanolic Extracts of Zanthoxylum schinifolium Fruit and Pericarp
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Porous Hydroxyapatite/Graphene Oxide/Chitosan Beads as an Efficient Adsorbent for Dyes and Heavy Metal Ions Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties of Red (cv. Negramaro) and White (cv. Fiano) Skin Pomace Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Precursor Nature and Sol-Gel Synthesis Conditions on TiO2 Aerogel’s Structure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 19
10.3390/molecules26195917
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photocatalytic Crystalline and Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition

by
Orsolya Kéri
1,
Eszter Kocsis
1,
Dániel Attila Karajz
1,
Zsombor Kristóf Nagy
2,
Bence Parditka
3,
Zoltán Erdélyi
3,
Anna Szabó
4,
Klára Hernádi
4,5 and
Imre Miklós Szilágyi
1,*
1
Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
3
Department of Solid State Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Debrecen, H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
4
Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary
5
Institute of Physical Metallurgy, Metalforming and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(19), 5917; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195917
Submission received: 9 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 29 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sol-Gel Composites and Aerogels)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work core/shell composite polymer/TiO2 nanofibers and from those TiO2 nanotubes were prepared. First, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) fibers were synthetized by electrospinning. They were covered with a 100 nm thick amorphous TiO2 layer by atomic layer deposition at 50 °C. Later the polymer core was removed by two different methods: dissolution and annealing. In the case of dissolution in water, the as-prepared TiO2 nanotubes remained amorphous, while when annealing was used to remove the polymers, the TiO2 crystallized in anatase form. Due to this, the properties of amorphous and crystalline TiO2 nanotubes with exactly the same structure and morphology could be compared. The samples were investigated by SEM-EDX, ATR-IR, UV-Vis, XRD and TG/DTA-MS. Finally, the photocatalytic properties of the TiO2 nanotubes were studied by decomposing methyl-orange dye under UV light. According to the results, crystalline anatase TiO2 nanotubes reached the photocatalytic performance of P25, while amorphous TiO2 nanotubes had observable photocatalytic activity.

1. Introduction

Nowadays the importance of utilizing renewable energy sources is increasing. One of these renewable sources is sunlight, which can be converted into chemical energy for example through photocatalysis [1]. Photocatalysis uses solar energy to enable or accelerate chemical reactions [2]. The research of semiconductor oxide (e.g., WO3, ZnO or TiO2) photocatalysis has grown exponentially in the recent years [3]. The most widely used semiconductor oxide in this field is TiO2, which has three crystalline phases (anatase, rutile and brookite). The anatase and rutile forms have been thoroughly studied, and it was found that generally anatase TiO2 has a higher activity than rutile, mostly thanks to its higher adsorbance capacity for organic compounds [4,5]. Meanwhile brookite was not investigated as exhaustively, since it is immensely difficult to obtain in pure phase and due to this, it would be too expensive to use [6]. In amorphous form TiO2 is considered not to have any photocatalytic effect, owing to that its crystal structure contains many imperfections, which can serve as recombination centers for the electron-hole pairs. Amorphous TiO2 was only used in composition with nanostructured materials (e.g., lotus leaves [7], fullerene [8]) or with other photocatalitically active semiconductor oxides [9] to prepare photocatalysts. TiO2 and composites containing TiO2 are tested as photocatalysts for many different applications, amongst these are the decomposition of organic contaminants [10,11], water purification [12,13], the preparation of self-cleaning surfaces [14,15], sterilization [16,17], photoelectrochemical conversion [18,19], etc.
The photocatalytic efficiency is dependent on many properties of the material, such as the composition, crystallinity, morphology and the specific surface area. Thus, being able to control these characteristics is key in achieving good photocatalytic activity. These could be controlled through choosing the most suitable synthesis method. There are many different preparation strategies and techniques, which can be used or also combined to attain the best results [20,21]. One synthesis method, which enables the preparation of nanomaterials with high specific surface area and precisely controlled composition, is electrospinning [22,23]. This technique has a simple set-up; a polymer solution or melt, which can also contain the precursor salt of metal-oxides, is filled into a plastic syringe with a metal needle tip. Then high voltage is applied to it, which causes the eruption of charged jets from the surface of the liquid. These jets stretch to ultrathin fibers due to the applied electric field and dry mid-flight, before reaching the grounded collector. If the polymer solution already contains the precursor of a semiconductor oxide, e.g., titanium tetraisopropoxide, pure oxide nanofibers can be prepared by annealing the composite to high temperatures [24]. In this case the polymer content is burnt out completely.
If pure polymer fibers are prepared, they can be used as templates for the preparation of core/shell nanofibers by covering them with a thin layer of semiconductor oxide [25,26]. The polymers are usually thermosensitive materials, and due to that the deposition of the film onto them has to be done at low temperatures, but also a highly organized structure is needed for good photocatalytic activity. A thin film deposition method, that meets both requirements, is atomic layer deposition (ALD) [27,28]. By this method the growth of thin layers is possible within nanometer range precision, owing to the alternating surface controlled reactions. If the right precursors are chosen for the synthesis, the reaction temperature can be lowered even to room temperature; thus, it can be easily combined with electrospinning [29].
The aim of our work was to prepare polymer/TiO2 core/shell composite nanofibers and then TiO2 nanotubes by removing the polymer core. For that, first, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) nanofibers were prepared by electrospinning from their aqueous solutions. These fibers were then used as templates for preparing polymer/TiO2 core/shell nanocomposites. The polymers were covered with amorphous TiO2 layers by ALD. For photocatalytic purposes crystalline TiO2 was needed, therefore the composite nanofibers were annealed to remove the polymer core and crystallize the TiO2 in anatase form. The polymer was also removed from the samples by dissolution, to be able to compare the properties of the anatase TiO2 nanotubes to amorphous ones that have the exact same morphology. All the samples were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), ATR-IR and UV-Vis spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). Finally, the photocatalytic properties were studied by decomposing methyl orange dye under UV irradiation, which was followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy.

2. Results

2.1. Preparation of the Polymer Fibers

2.1.1. SEM-EDX of the Polymer Nanofibers

The SEM images showed that both the as-prepared PVA (Figure 1a) and the PVP (Figure 2a) nanofibers had a fairly uniform fibrous structure, the fibers were several centimeters long. The PVA nanofibers had a diameter of 200–300 nm, while the PVP fibers were about 500–700 nm thick.

2.1.2. Thermal Analysis of the Polymer Nanofibers in Nitrogen

Before any further synthesis steps, the thermal analysis of the fibers was done by TG/DTA (Figure 3) in inert (nitrogen) atmosphere in order to determine what temperature could be used for the ALD deposition without degrading the polymer fibers. In the case of both polymers, until 100 °C, there was no significant mass loss (Figure 3a,b); only water, which was used as the solvent during the electrospinning, evaporated. Then, above 200 °C the degradation of the polymers stared. The PVP decomposed in one step, while for the PVA the degradation consisted of several smaller overlapping steps. On the TGA curves of the PVA and the PVP as well, there were three endothermic peaks. The first one referred to the evaporation of the solvent, while the last one to the decomposition. When the second endothermic peak appeared on the DTA curve, there was no corresponding mass loss on the TG curves, so these endothermic peaks represented the softening of the PVA (at 192 °C) and of the PVP (at 186 °C). Based on these results, a very low temperature, 50 °C was chosen for the ALD depositions.

2.2. Preparation of the TiO2 Nanotubes

2.2.1. SEM-EDX of the Polymer/TiO2 Core/Shell Nanofibers

After the ALD deposition of 100 nm thick TiO2 layers onto the polymer nanofibers, the composites had the same fibrous structure (Figure 1b and Figure 2b). The polymers did not soften during the exothermic ALD reactions. The overall diameter of the PVA/TiO2 core/shell nanocomposite was about 300–400 nm, while the PVP/TiO2 nanofibers were 600–800 nm.

2.2.2. Thermal Analysis of the Polymer/TiO2 Core/Shell Nanofibers in Air

The core was removed from the core/shell composites by two different methods. For the removal by annealing, first the thermal decomposition of PVA and PVP in air had to be investigated by TG/DTA (Figure 3c,d) The steps were similar in air to the ones in nitrogen atmosphere. Again, just water evaporated up to 100 °C and then above 230 °C the polymers started to burn, the decomposition of more overlapping steps [30], than in nitrogen in the case of both polymers. When the polymers were heated in nitrogen, by 600 °C, they did not decompose totally there was some organic char residue that remained; however, in air by 550 °C both the PVA and the PVP burnt out completely. Based on this, for the removal of the core the following heating program was chosen: the samples were heated by 10 °C/min up to 230 °C and then the heating rate was lowered to 2 °C/min until the temperature reached 550 °C. The lowering of the heating rate was necessary in order to protect the as-formed nanotube structure, otherwise the evolved gases would break up the walls.

2.2.3. SEM-EDX of The TiO2 Nanotubes

On the SEM images (Figure 1c,d and Figure 2c,d) it was visible that after annealing the PVA/TiO2 and the PVP/TiO2 nanocomposites, the core was successfully removed and TiO2 nanotubes were formed. These had a wall thickness of about 100 nm. The other way for removing the polymer core was dissolution in water. The SEM images (Figure 1e,f and Figure 2e,f) showed similar results to the annealed samples, again tubular structures could be seen. The electrospun nanofibers were several centimeters long and the length stayed the same after the ALD depositions as well; however, after either dissolution or annealing, the nanotubes broke into shorter, few micrometer long pieces.
In all the cases the SEM studies were accompanied by EDX measurements (Table 1). After the deposition the EDX spectra showed the presence of a high amount of Ti in the samples. Also, some Cl content was observable, which implicated that a small amount by-product from the TiCl4 precursor remained in the sample. The amount of carbon significantly lowered after both the dissolution and the annealing. Some of the remaining carbon might have come from the double-sided carbon tape, which was used to fix the samples to the sample holders during the measurements. The carbon content was higher after dissolution, than after annealing, which implied that annealing was the more efficient way to remove the polymer core. Also, the TiO2 nanotubes prepared from the PVP/TiO2 nanofibers had a lower carbon amount, which can be explained by the wider diameter of these fibers, which made the elimination of the polymer easier from the PVP/TiO2 composite, than from the one containing PVA.

2.2.4. FT-IR Spectroscopy of The TiO2 Nanotubes

The SEM-EDX results in themselves were not enough to prove that the polymer was completely removed; therefore, the infrared spectra of the samples were also studied (Figure 4). First, the spectra of the pure PVA (Figure 4a) and PVP (Figure 4b) were measured. In the spectrum of PVA the broad peak between 3100–3500 cm−1 referred to the stretching vibrations OH groups, the peaks at 1732 cm−1 and 1088 cm−1 corresponded to the C=O, while the absorption band at 839 cm−1 to C-C bonds. The peaks at 1373 cm−1 and 1240 cm−1 were respectively the wagging vibrations of the CH2 and CH groups [31]. In the case of PVP again, the band 3100–3500 cm−1 signified the stretching vibrations OH groups. At 1460 cm−1 and 1422 cm−1 the bending modes of the CH2 groups appeared. The absorption bands at 1649 cm−1, 1285 cm−1 and 1271 cm−1 corresponded respectively to stretching vibrations of the C=O, C-O and the C-N bonds [32,33]. After the deposition of TiO2 onto the polymers, under 900 cm−1 the bands referring to TiO2 appeared on the spectra, but the peaks of the polymers were still visible as well. In the case of the composites containing PVP, both after dissolution and annealing, the polymer bands completely disappeared from the spectra. Meanwhile, in the case of PVA, after annealing there was no sign of any remaining polymer on the spectra; however, after dissolution there were still some small peaks of the PVA. These results were in correlation with the EDX measurements, the TiO2 nanotubes obtained by dissolution from the PVA/TiO2 nanocomposite had the highest carbon content.

2.2.5. Powder XRD Measurement of the TiO2 Nanotubes

The XRD patterns of the samples were recorded as well (Figure 5). The diffractograms showed that both the PVA (Figure 5a) and the PVP (Figure 5b), as well as the ALD deposited TiO2 were amorphous. After dissolution no peaks appeared on the diffractograms; hence, as expected the TiO2 stayed amorphous. After annealing to 550 °C the TiO2 nanotubes crystallized in anatase form, which was identified based on the ICDD database (ICDD-01-075-2547). There is one small peak at Figure 5a, at ca. 28°, which does not match anatase. It might be due to some trace impurities or minor amount of rutile TiO2 (ICDD 01-88-1175). The average crystallite size of the anatase TiO2 nanotubes prepared from the PVA/TiO2 composite was 35–40 nm, while for the one made from PVP/TiO2 it was 20–25 nm.

2.2.6. UV-Vis Spectroscopy of the TiO2 Nanotubes

From the UV-Vis spectra of the TiO2 nanotubes (Figure 6) the absorption edges were determined, and from those the band gap energies were calculated [34]. The band gap energy for the samples prepared by dissolution from PVA and PVP were 3.31 eV and 3.15 eV, while for the anatase TiO2 nanotubes synthetized by annealing from PVA and PVP were 3.03 eV and 3.10 eV. It is noted that the bandgap of ALD prepared amorphous TiO2 nanotubes is wider than the corresponding crystalline ones. This might be unexpected at first sight, because crystalline TiO2 is usually tend to have lower concentration of defects, and thus wider bandgap, compared to amorphous TiO2. However, recently it was revealed that the bandgap of amorphous TiO2 strongly depended on the Ti:O ratio and on the type of defects in the structure. Certain compositions (preferably partially reduced TiO2 with oxygen vacancies) resulted in higher bandgap for amorphous TiO2 compared to crystalline TiO2, as revealed both experimentally and by ab initio calculations [35,36,37].

2.2.7. Photocatalysis Study of the TiO2 Nanotubes

Finally, the photocatalytic activity of the samples was investigated by decomposing methyl orange dye under UV light and compared to P25 TiO2, which was used as a reference (Figure 7). The P25 TiO2 decomposed more than 20% of the dye under these circumstances in 4 h.
The TiO2 nanotubes that were prepared by annealing from the PVA/TiO2 composite, had almost as good an efficiency, while the nanotubes prepared by annealing from the composite containing PVP as the core, had the same effect as the P25 TiO2. These samples consisted almost completely of anatase TiO2. In the case of the crystalline TiO2 nanotubes the apparent reaction rate constants (kapp) were determined as well assuming pseudo first order kinetics (Figure 8) [38]. The constants for the TiO2 prepared from the PVA composite was 7.3 × 10−4 min−1, while for the one prepared from the PVP/TiO2 composite and for the P25 TiO2 it was 10.5 × 10−4 min−1.
The photocatalytic activity of the nanotubes prepared by dissolution, clearly did not reach the activity of the annealed samples, mainly because these contained amorphous TiO2. However, there was a small but detectable effect in the case of the amorphous TiO2 nanotubes prepared from the PVP/TiO2 nanofibers. This was probably not observable in the case of the sample prepared by dissolution from the PVA/TiO2 composite because that contained a higher amount of remaining residue from the PVA core, and its photocatalytic effect could have been split between decomposing the dye and the remaining polymer [39]. Still in the case of the amorphous TiO2 nanotubes prepared from the composite containing PVP, the observed photocatalytic activity was an unexpected.
The photocatalytic feature of ALD prepared amorphous TiO2 was first detected when amorphous TiO2 was grown onto lotus leaf by ALD at relatively low temperature [7]. Since then the our group has demonstrated the photocatalytic activity of ALD prepared amorphous TiO2 by several examples using various substrates such as fullerene, carbon aerogel, SiO2 or PMMA nanoparticles, graphene oxide [8,40,41]. For this odd photocatalytic behavior of ALD grown amorphous TiO2, several possible reasons were assumed, e.g., (1) the coating interacted with the substrate during the photocatalytic reactions, (2) the samples contained nanocrystalline domains or (3) there was a small amount of carbon atoms left over from the ALD precursor (TTIP) in the TiO2 layers. When the photocatalytically inactive SiO2 or PMMA were the substrates, amorphous TiO2 still had photocatalytic effect. Even in these cases, charge separation between the outer layer and the substrate might contribute to the photocatalytic effect; however, here in the case of TiO2 nanotubes the core was completely removed (1). Electron diffraction studies did not reveal nanocrystalline domains, which were previously not visible by XRD (2). In the present study the Ti precursor was carbon free (unlike e.g., TTIP or TDMAT), therefore there were no carbon impurities in amorphous TiO2. Although Cl might be present, but it is unlikely to account for the same photocatalytic activity as a supposed C content (3).
Very recent studies on [42,43] ALD grown amorphous TiO2 and AL2O3 layers might provide an explanation for our data about the photocatalytic property of low temperature ALD prepared amorphous TiO2. In these studies it was shown that partially reduced, oxygen deficient, amorphous, ALD grown TiO2 and Al2O3 layers had oxygen vacancies and increased amount of non-lattice oxygen in their structure. These could successfully trap holes, and this way they decreased the charge recombination and increased the lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers, and contributed to a higher photocatalytic efficiency.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Preparation of the Polymer Fibers

The poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and the poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) fibers were prepared by electrospinning, both from their aqueous solutions. For the electrospinning of the PVA fibers 0.4 g of the solid poly(vinyl alcohol) was dissolved in 4 cm3 of distilled water. The PVP solution was prepared by dissolving 1.1 g of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) in 4 cm3 of distilled water. The PVA solution was stirred for 4 h, while the PVP solution for 24 h, both at room temperature. For the electrospinning, the solutions were transferred into a plastic syringe, which was connected to the needle tip by polymer tubing. The applied voltage was 20 kV and a feeding rate of 0.5 cm3/h was used. The nanofibers were collected on aluminum foil, which was covered with a polypropylene fabric. The fabric was applied, because it was easier to remove the fiber mats from them without damaging the polymer nanofibers.

3.2. Thermal Analysis of the Polymer Fibers

Before the atomic layer deposition of TiO2 could be done, it had to be determined what deposition temperature could be used, so that the polymers would not soften. For this the thermal properties of both the PVA and PVP were investigated in inert atmosphere, which simulates the circumstances of the ALD reactor better (nitrogen, flow rate: 130 cm3/min). The thermal analysis was also carried out in oxidative atmosphere (air, flow rate: 130 cm3/min) to determine what annealing temperature is needed to totally remove the polymer core. Both measurements were done in a TA Instruments SDT 2960 simultaneous TG/DTA equipment, the polymers were heated with 10 °C/min heating rate to 600 °C in Pt crucibles.

3.3. Atomic Layer Deposition of the TiO2 Layer

The TiO2 thin films were prepared by atomic layer deposition from titanium tetrachloride (TiCl4) and H2O precursors in a Beneq TFS-200-186 reactor. The pulse time for both precursors was 0.2 s, which was followed by a 3 s nitrogen purge. The layers were grown in 1400 cycles at 50 °C. The theoretical thickness (100 nm) was confirmed by profilometer (AMBIOS XP-I) after the deposition.

3.4. Preparation of the TiO2 Nanotubes

The removal of the PVA and PVP polymer cores was done by two different methods. Both the PVA and the PVP are water-soluble; thus, one approach was dissolution. For this the samples were put into 60 °C water for 2 h. The sample could not have been stirred, because it would have damaged the nanotubes; hence, the adequate efficiency of the dissolution was achieved by changing the solvent every 30 min. The other method for removing the polymer was annealing, which was done in a TA Instruments SDT 2960 simultaneous TG/DTA instrument. The composites were annealed to 550 °C. At around 230 °C the more intense decomposition of the polymers started; thus, until that temperature the heating rate was 10 °C/min, but after reaching it, the heating rate was lowered to 2 °C/min to avoid the cracking of the oxide walls.

3.5. Characterization

The morphology of all the samples was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with a JEOL JSM-5500LV microscope. The samples were coated by a thin Au/Pd layer in a sputter coater before the measurements were carried out. The composition of the samples was also studied by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, the measurements were done at 20 kV. High resolution images were recorded by a LEO 1540 XB scanning electron microscope.
The powder XRD patterns were recorded with a PANalytical X’pert Pro MPD X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα irradiation. The crystallite sizes were calculated based on the Scherrer-equation.
The FT-IR spectra were studied by a Bruker Tensor 37 IR spectrometer equipped with a Goldengate SpecAC ATR head.
The UV-Vis spectra were recorded on an Avantes AvaSpec-2048 spectrophotometer in reflectance mode, using Teflon background.
Finally, the photocatalytic activity of the samples was investigated by decomposing 0.04 mM aqueous solution of methyl orange (MO) dye under UV irradiation. For the measurements 1 mg of the samples was put into 3 cm3 of the MO solution in quartz cuvettes. Before the UV illumination, the samples were kept in the dark for 2 h to reach the adsorption equilibrium. After that they were illuminated for 4 h by two parallel UV lamps (Osram blacklight, 18 W, UV-A) that were placed 5–5 cm from the sample. The measured wavelength of the lamp is between 350–390 nm (maximum intensity at 375 nm), and the estimated power at the samples is 0.5 W. The UV-Vis spectra of the MO were measured every 30 min by a Jasco V-550 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The relative absorbance values were determined at the 464 nm absorption peak of the MO and plotted versus time. As a reference the samples were compared to P25 TiO2 (Aeroxide) measured under the same conditions.

4. Conclusions

The photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanotubes were investigated in this work. For this, at first, PVA and PVP nanofibers were prepared by electrospinning; and then these were coated with TiO2 layers by atomic layer deposition (ALD). The polymer core was removed from the PVA/TiO2 and PVP/TiO2 nanocomposites by two different methods, dissolution and annealing. This gave the opportunity to compare amorphous and crystalline TiO2 nanotubes with the same dimensions and morphology. After the samples were annealed, the TiO2 crystallized in anatase phase, and the nanotubes prepared from both PVA and PVP had a good photocatalytic efficiency, reaching that of P25. Regarding the dissolution, as expected, the TiO2 shell stayed amorphous. However, in the case of the nanotubes prepared from the composite containing PVP, the samples showed a small but detectable photocatalytic effect.
Hence, the photocatalytic property of amorphous TiO2 grown by ALD is now confirmed by using substrate free amorphous TiO2 layers, i.e., by the as-prepared amorphous TiO2 nanotubes of the present study, complementing our previous data about amorphous ALD TiO2 deposited onto various substrates. It seems that the possible partially reduced structure of ALD grown oxides (especially oxygen vacancies and non-lattice oxygens) might be the key, and with them the photocatalytic property of amorphous TiO2 can be successfully explained.
It is suggested that these observations can open a very new field for various ALD prepared amorphous oxides (e.g., ZnO, ZrO2, SnO2, WO3, MoO3, etc.) as effective photocatalysts. The optimal layer thickness, composition, etc. have to be investigated further for each oxide, and more insight is needed into the occurring phenomena as well. It is also supposed that other synthesis methods (e.g., sol-gel, hydrothermal, sputtering, etc.) can also yield similarly active photocatalytic amorphous oxides. These can lead to novel applications and products, e.g., coating highly structured heat sensitive substrates with cheap, biocompatible, self-cleaning, ultrathin films.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M.S. and O.K.; methodology, O.K., E.K., D.A.K., Z.K.N., B.P., Z.E., A.S. and K.H.; resources, I.M.S., Z.E. and K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, O.K.; writing—review and editing, O.K., E.K., D.A.K., Z.K.N., B.P., Z.E., A.S., K.H. and I.M.S.; visualization, O.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

An NRDI K 124212 and an NRDI TNN_16 123631 grant are acknowledged. The research within project No. VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2017-00013 was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The research reported in this paper and carried out at BME has been supported by the NRDI Fund TKP2021 BME-NVA based on the charter of bolster issued by the NRDI Office under the auspices of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology. The research was supported by the Thematic Excellence Programme (TKP2020-IKA-04) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, S.; Wang, D. Photocatalysis: Basic Principles, Diverse Forms of Implementations and Emerging Scientific Opportunities. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Assadi, M.H.N.; Hanaor, D.A.H. The effects of copper doping on photocatalytic activity at (101) planes of anatase TiO2: A theoretical study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 387, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Doustkhah, E.; Assadi, M.H.N.; Komaguchi, K.; Tsunoji, N.; Esmat, M.; Fukata, N.; Tomita, O.; Abe, R.; Ohtani, B.; Ide, Y. In situ Blue titania via band shape engineering for exceptional solar H2 production in rutile TiO2. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 297, 120380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Di Paola, A.; Bellardita, M.; Palmisano, L.; Group, S.P.; Energia, D.; Informazione, I. Brookite, the Least Known TiO2 Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2013, 3, 36–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Szilágyi, I.M.; Teucher, G.; Härkönen, E.; Färm, E.; Hatanpää, T.; Nikitin, T.; Khriachtchev, L.; Räsänen, M.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M. Programming nanostructured soft biological surfaces by atomic layer deposition. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 245701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Justh, N.; Firkala, T.; László, K.; Lábár, J.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic C60-amorphous TiO2 composites prepared by atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 419, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, L. The photocatalytic properties of amorphous TiO2 composite films deposited by magnetron sputtering. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2011, 38, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jallouli, N.; Pastrana-martínez, L.M.; Ribeiro, A.R.; Moreira, N.F.F.; Faria, J.L.; Hentati, O.; Silva, A.M.T.; Ksibi, M. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen in ultrapure water, municipal and pharmaceutical industry wastewaters using a TiO2/UV-LED system. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Fang, J.; Lai, M. Large-scale preparation of rice-husk-derived mesoporous SiO2@TiO2 as efficient and promising photocatalysts for organic contaminants degradation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 467, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sreeja, S.; Shetty, K.V. Photocatalytic water disinfection under solar irradiation by Ag@TiO2 core-shell structured nanoparticles. Sol. Energy 2017, 157, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baruah, S.; Najam, M.; Joydeep, K. Perspectives and applications of nanotechnology in water treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2016, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krishna, M.G.; Vinjanampati, M.; Purkayastha, D.D. Metal oxide thin films and nanostructures for self-cleaning applications: Current status and future prospects. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 62, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gholami, A.; Alemrajabi, A.A.; Saboonchi, A. Experimental study of self-cleaning property of titanium dioxide and nanospray coatings in solar applications. Sol. Energy 2017, 157, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, H.; Song, L.; Hao, Y.; Lu, N.; Quan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y. Fabrication of pilot-scale photocatalytic disinfection device by installing TiO2 coated helical support into UV annular reactor for strengthening sterilization. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; Meng, Y.; Guo, R. Hydrogenated nanoporous TiO2 film on Ti-25Nb-3Mo-2Sn-3Zr alloy with enhanced photocatalytic and sterilization activities driven by visible light. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 678, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kite, S.V.; Sathe, D.J.; Patil, S.S.; Bhosale, P.N.; Garadkar, K.M. Nanostructured TiO2 thin films by chemical bath deposition method for high photoelectrochemical performance. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 026411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krysiak, O.A.; Barczuk, P.J.; Bienkowski, K.; Wojciechowski, T.; Augustynski, J. The photocatalytic activity of rutile and anatase TiO2 electrodes modified with plasmonic metal nanoparticles followed by photoelectrochemical measurements. Catal. Today 2019, 321, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gleiter, H. Nanostructured Materials: Basic Concepts and Mictrostructure. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N.; Loh, J.; Jie, N. Methods and strategies for the synthesis of diverse nanoparticles and their applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105003–105037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mussa Farkhani, S.; Valizadeh, A. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibres. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014, 8, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thenmozhi, S.; Dharmaraj, N.; Kadirvelu, K.; Kim, H.Y. Electrospun nanofibers: New generation materials for advanced applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2017, 217, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boyadjiev, S.I.; Kéri, O.; Bárdos, P.; Firkala, T.; Gáber, F.; Nagy, Z.K.; Baji, Z.; Takács, M.; Szilágyi, I.M. TiO2/ZnO and ZnO/TiO2 core/shell nanofibers prepared by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition for photocatalysis and gas sensing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 424, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Szilágyi, I.M.; Santala, E.; Heikkilä, M.; Pore, V.; Kemell, M.; Nikitin, T.; Teucher, G.; Firkala, T.; Khriachtchev, L.; Räsänen, M.; et al. Photocatalytic Properties of WO3/TiO2 Core/Shell Nanofibers prepared by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2013, 19, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kéri, O.; Kocsis, E.; Nagy, Z.K.; Parditka, B.; Erdélyi, Z.; Szilágyi, I.M. Preparation of Al2O3 coated PVA and PVP nanofibers and Al2O3 nanotubes by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2018, 63, 401–406. [Google Scholar]
  27. George, S.M. Atomic layer deposition: An overview. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, M.; Li, X.; Karuturi, S.K.; Tok, A.I.Y.; Fan, H.J. Atomic layer deposition for nanofabrication and interface engineering. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 1522–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szilágyi, I.M.; Nagy, D. Review on one-dimensional nanostructures prepared by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 559, 012010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Betti, N.A. Thermogravimetric Analysis on PVA/PVP Blend Under Air Atmosphere. Eng. Technol. J. 2016, 34, 2433–2441. [Google Scholar]
  31. Alghunaim, N.S. Optimization and spectroscopic studies on carbon nanotubes/PVA nanocomposites. Results Phys. 2016, 6, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Szilágyi, I.M.; Santala, E.; Kemell, M.; Nikitin, T.; Khriachtchev, L.; Räsänen, M.; Ritala, M. Thermal study on electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone/ammonium metatungstate nanofibers: Optimising the annealing conditions for obtaining WO3 nanofibers. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2011, 105, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jovanocic, Z.; Radosavljevic, A.; Siljegovic, M.; Bibic, N.; Miskovic-Stankovic, V.Z. Kacarevic-Popovic, Structural and optical characteristics of silver/poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) nanosystems synthesized by g-irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1720–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tauc, J.; Scott, T.A. The Optical Propeties of Solids. Phys. Today 1967, 20, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hannula, M.; Ali-Löytty, H.; Lahtonen, K.; Sarlin, E.; Saari, J.; Valden, M. Improved stability of atomic layer deposited amorphous TiO2 photoelectrode coatings by thermally induced oxygen defects. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Valencia, S.; Marín, J.M.; Restrepo, G. Study of the bandgap of synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticules using the sol-gel method and a hydrothermal treatment. Open Mater. Sci. J. 2010, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Deskins, T.N.A.; Dub, J.; Raoc, P. The structural and electronic properties of reduced amorphous titania. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 18671–18684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Y.; Yu, J.C.; Yu, J.; Kwok, Y.; Che, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ding, L.; Ge, W.; Wong, P. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 by using carbon nanotubes. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2005, 289, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hsu, L.; Lee, L.; Lin, C. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of polyvinyl alcohol in aqueous solutions using P-25 TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Justh, N.; Mikula, G.J.; Bakos, L.P.; Nagy, B.; László, K.; Parditka, B.; Erdélyi, Z.; Takáts, V.; Mizsei, J.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic properties of polymer/TiO2 and carbon/TiO2 aerogel composites prepared by atomic layer deposition. Carbon 2019, 146, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kéri, O.; Kócs, L.; Hórvölgyi, Z.; Kárpáti, L.; Baji, Z.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic amorphous and crystalline TiO2 prepared by atomic layer deposition. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2019, 63, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hussien, M.S.A.; Shenouda, S.S.; Parditka, B.; Csík, A.; Erdélyi, Z. Enhancement of Urbach’s energy and non-lattice oxygen content of TiO1.7 ultra-thin films for more photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 15236–15241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shenouda, S.S.; Hussien, M.S.A.; Parditka, B.; Csík, A.; Takats, V.; Erdélyi, Z. Novel amorphous Al-rich Al2O3 ultra-thin films as active photocatalysts for water treatment from some textile dyes. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 7922–7929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 05917 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) PVA nanofibers; (b) PVA/TiO2 composite nanofibers, (c,d) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVA/TiO2 composite by dissolution, (e,f) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVA/TiO2 composite by annealing.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) PVA nanofibers; (b) PVA/TiO2 composite nanofibers, (c,d) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVA/TiO2 composite by dissolution, (e,f) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVA/TiO2 composite by annealing.
Molecules 26 05917 g001
Molecules 26 05917 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PVP nanofibers; (b) PVP/TiO2 composite nanofibers, (c,d) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVP/TiO2 composite by dissolution, (e,f) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVP/TiO2 composite by annealing.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) PVP nanofibers; (b) PVP/TiO2 composite nanofibers, (c,d) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVP/TiO2 composite by dissolution, (e,f) TiO2 nanotubes obtained from the PVP/TiO2 composite by annealing.
Molecules 26 05917 g002
Molecules 26 05917 g003 550
Figure 3. TG/DTA measurements, (a) PVA in N2; (b) PVP in N2; (c) PVA in air; (d) PVP in air.
Figure 3. TG/DTA measurements, (a) PVA in N2; (b) PVP in N2; (c) PVA in air; (d) PVP in air.
Molecules 26 05917 g003
Molecules 26 05917 g004 550
Figure 4. ATR-IR results of the samples prepared from (a) PVA, (b) PVP.
Figure 4. ATR-IR results of the samples prepared from (a) PVA, (b) PVP.
Molecules 26 05917 g004
Molecules 26 05917 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the samples prepared from (a) PVA, (b) PVP (The anatase peaks have been now marked with green circles).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the samples prepared from (a) PVA, (b) PVP (The anatase peaks have been now marked with green circles).
Molecules 26 05917 g005
Molecules 26 05917 g006 550
Figure 6. UV-Vis spectra of the TiO2 nanotubes.
Figure 6. UV-Vis spectra of the TiO2 nanotubes.
Molecules 26 05917 g006
Molecules 26 05917 g007 550
Figure 7. Photocatalysis of the TiO2 nanotubes prepared from (a) PVA/TiO2, (b) PVP/TiO2 composite.
Figure 7. Photocatalysis of the TiO2 nanotubes prepared from (a) PVA/TiO2, (b) PVP/TiO2 composite.
Molecules 26 05917 g007
Molecules 26 05917 g008 550
Figure 8. Kinetics of the photocatalytic reaction of the crystalline TiO2 nanotubes.
Figure 8. Kinetics of the photocatalytic reaction of the crystalline TiO2 nanotubes.
Molecules 26 05917 g008
Table
Table 1. EDX results of the composites.
Table 1. EDX results of the composites.
Samples Containing PVASamples Containing PVA
PVA/TiO2TiO2 NTs DissolutionTiO2 NTs AnnealingPVP/TiO2TiO2 NTs DissolutionTiO2 NTs Annealing
C%36.415.76.039.07.54.6
N---7.53.32.1
O38.345.659.128.849.246.5
Cl2.64.31.03.35.11.3
Ti22.734.433.921.434.945.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kéri, O.; Kocsis, E.; Karajz, D.A.; Nagy, Z.K.; Parditka, B.; Erdélyi, Z.; Szabó, A.; Hernádi, K.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic Crystalline and Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Molecules 2021, 26, 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195917

AMA Style

Kéri O, Kocsis E, Karajz DA, Nagy ZK, Parditka B, Erdélyi Z, Szabó A, Hernádi K, Szilágyi IM. Photocatalytic Crystalline and Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition. Molecules. 2021; 26(19):5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195917

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kéri, Orsolya, Eszter Kocsis, Dániel Attila Karajz, Zsombor Kristóf Nagy, Bence Parditka, Zoltán Erdélyi, Anna Szabó, Klára Hernádi, and Imre Miklós Szilágyi. 2021. "Photocatalytic Crystalline and Amorphous TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Electrospinning and Atomic Layer Deposition" Molecules 26, no. 19: 5917. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195917

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop