Next Article in Journal
Curative Effect of Catechin Isolated from Elaeagnus Umbellata Thunb. Berries for Diabetes and Related Complications in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats Model
Previous Article in Journal
Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Glass/Epoxy Composite Laminates Embedded with Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Wires
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules26010139
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biological Insights of Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Compounds on Multi-Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

by
Sally Elmogy
1,
Mohamed A. Ismail
2,
Rabeay Y. A. Hassan
3,4,
Ahmed Noureldeen
5,6,
Hadeer Darwish
7,8,
Eman Fayad
7,
Fahmy Elsaid
9,10 and
Ashraf Elsayed
1,*
1
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura 35516, Egypt
2
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura 35516, Egypt
3
Nanoscience Program, University of Science and Technology (UST), Zewail City of Science and Technology, 6th October City, Giza 12588, Egypt
4
Applied Organic Chemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
5
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura 35516, Egypt
7
Department of Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Horticulture Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza 12619, Egypt
9
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 10347, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia
10
Zoology Department, Faculty of Sciences, Mansoura University, Elgomhouria St., Mansoura 35516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(1), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010139
Submission received: 26 November 2020 / Revised: 26 December 2020 / Accepted: 28 December 2020 / Published: 30 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Resistance of bacteria to multiple antibiotics is a significant health problem; hence, to continually respond to this challenge, different antibacterial agents must be constantly discovered. In this work, fluoroaryl-2,2′-bichalcophene derivatives were chemically synthesized and their biological activities were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). The impact of the investigated bichalcophene derivatives was studied on the ultrastructural level via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), molecular level via sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) method and on the biofilm inhibition via the electrochemical biosensors. Arylbichalcophenes’ antibacterial activity against S. aureus was affected by the presence and location of fluorine atoms. The fluorobithiophene derivative MA-1156 displayed the best minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 16 µM among the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes. Over a period of seven days, S. aureus did not develop any resistance against the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes at higher concentrations. The impact of fluoroarylbichalcophenes was strong on S. aureus protein pattern showing high degrees of polymorphism. SEM micrographs of S. aureus cells treated with fluoroarylbichalcophenes displayed smaller cell-sizes, fewer numbers, arranged in a linear form and some of them were damaged when compared to the untreated cells. The bioelectrochemical measurements demonstrated the strong sensitivity of S. aureus cells to the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes and an antibiofilm agent. Eventually, these fluoroarylbichalcophene compounds especially the MA-1156 could be recommended as effective antibacterial agents.

1. Introduction

Several antibiotics have been developed to control bacterial infections after penicillin discovery [1]. However, the resistance of bacteria to several antibiotics has developed and become a major global problem [2]. The resistance development rate is affected by several factors, including excessive use and abuse of antibiotics [3]. To restrict the resistant bacteria spreading, different effective therapies need to be continuously developed in order not to return to the pre-antibiotic therapy. Such problems have led to the need to use chemically synthesized heterocyclic compounds that can be associated with wide-spectrum activity and have a substantially lower propensity than antibiotics to cause microbial resistance [4].
Most biomass cellulose and related products, various pharmaceutical products, all nucleic acids, many natural and synthetic dyes, are heterocyclic compounds. Fifty-nine percent of US FDA-approved medications contain nitrogen heterocycles. [5]. Sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen are still the most prevalent heteroatoms. Cationic heterocyclic compounds containing two units of thiophene and/or furan are called bichalcophenes. Such compounds have shown a wide variety of biological activities [6,7,8]. One bifuran derivative of a bichalcophene series was more effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus than the antibiotic vancomycin in mice [9]. A series of phenyl bichalcophenes were found to have an efficient antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and P. aeruginosa in addition to Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus and B. subtilis and some strains of fungi such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae [10]. Due to the promising antimicrobial activity of these bichalcophene derivatives, the relationship between the novel bichalcophenes and tetracycline was explored in previous reports [11].
For better pharmacological properties, greater antimicrobial activity and lower toxicity than their non-fluorinated parent compounds, a series of fluoroarylbichalcophenes has been synthesized and published. These fluoroarylbichalcophene derivatives have been tested for their toxic effect on S. typhimurium TA1535 viability. It was found that, all the investigated fluorine-containing bichalcophenes exhibited a significant reduction on the S. typhimurium TA1535 viability at 50 and 100 µM. Moreover, it has been found that these investigated compounds were acted as potent antimutagenic [12] and anticancer agents [13]. The presence of fluorine atoms generally increases lipophilicity and therefore biological availability [14]. Fluorine substitution, through microsomal inhibition, was found to suppress mutagenicity of quinolone [15]. The enzymatic oxidation is usually prevented at the F-substitution site if the aromatic nucleus is fluorinated due to its electron-negativity nature [16]. As a result, F-substitution at the activation site may reduce the aromatic compounds carcinogenicity [17,18] and mutagenicity [19]. At position 3, quinoline was deprived of genotoxicity in vitro [20] and in vivo, while fluoroquinoline was genotoxic as quinolone [21]. The biological and chemical properties of compounds can be altered due to the fluorine substitution of molecule and this can lead to the development of a massive number of novel fluorinated drugs. The high electronegativity of the fluorine substituent affected a molecule metabolism, distribution, and absorption of molecules by modifying the electron distribution in that molecule. Pharmaceutical products containing fluorine are used in a variety of fields for the manufacture of anti-inflammatory, anticancer pharmaceutical drugs, cardiac therapy, anti-parasitic and antibiotics and general anesthetics [14]. Due to the exposure of some encouraging reports concerning the biological activity of fluorophenylbichalcophene derivatives, this research reported herein was launched to investigate the antibacterial impacts of monocationic fluorinated bichalcophenes at the molecular, cellular ultrastructure and biosensing levels against S. aureus.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Activity of the Tested Aryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Derivatives

The tested bichalcophenes (Figure 1a–g) exhibited a wide range of antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, whereas the maximum inhibition zone diameter recorded 20 mm with MA-1115 and MA-1114 compounds equally while the zone of inhibition produced by the non-fluorinated parent compounds, MA-0944 and MA-0947 were 14 mm and 15.5 mm diameter respectively. Thus, the MA-1156 compound has a considerable antimicrobial activity with inhibition zone diameter 15 mm. MA-1116 and MA-1113 showed an equal antimicrobial activity with inhibition zones diameter 16 mm as shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. The growth inhibition was not observed around the control disc containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The antimicrobial activity of the tested compounds with standard antibiotics as Cefoxitin and Gentamycin was compared using the disc diffusion method (data not shown). The antibiotics exhibited antimicrobial activities was very close to the activity of the parent compounds but in case of fluoroarylbichalcophenes the activity was lower.

2.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) of the Tested Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Derivatives

The MIC value of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophene derivatives was recorded at a minimum concentration not showing microbial growth (Table 2). Compound MA-1156 was the most effective candidate showing the best MIC value of 16 µM. The MA-1115 compound demonstrated a potent antimicrobial activity with the MIC value of 32 µM. MA-1116 compound prevented the growth of S. aureus at 64 µM. On the other hand, the MA-1113 and MA-1114 compounds displayed the highest MIC values at 128 µM and subsequently the lowest activity.

2.3. Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR)

The observed antibacterial activity of the MA-1156 indicated that the bithiophene linked to fluorophenyl moiety is promoting the antibacterial activity. Introducing fluorine into the phenyl group of compound MA-0944 increased its activity from MIC 12–16 μM. However, replacement of the thionyl moiety by a furyl moiety decreased the activity from MIC 16–32 µM.

2.4. Detection of the Tested Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophenes-Resistant Variants

The compounds MA-1156, MA-1116, and MA-1113 could effectively prevent S. aureus growth even after seven days with all concentrations. In contrast, one case of resistance was developed against the compound MA-1115 after the 3rd day of incubation with one-fold concentration (1× MIC). Another case of resistance appeared with one-fold concentration (1× MIC) of the compound MA-1114 after the 2nd day of incubation whereas the bacteria could not develop any resistance at higher concentrations (2× and 3× MIC) (Figure 3).

2.5. Effect of Fluoroarylbichalcophenes on S. aureus Protein Pattern

The changes of protein banding of S. aureus treated with the two sub-MIC concentrations of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes were presented in Figure 4. The total number of bands for MA-1156, MA-1115 and MA-1116 recorded 36 distributed as: 13 polymorphic, 12 monomorphic and 11 unique bands (Figure 4A). For the control sample, the total number of bands was 22 missing unique bands. Lane of 4 µM MA-1156 recorded the 27 maximum bands number higher than the control including eight unique bands. On the other hand, the 19 minimum bands number exposed at both lanes of 8 and 16 µM MA-1116. The lane of 2 µM MA-1156 showed 22 total bands similar to the control. Slight changes compared to control appeared in a lane of 4 µM MA-1115 recording 21 total protein bands and no unique bands were observed. Lane of 8 µM MA-1115 recorded the same 22 total protein bands as the control.
For MA-1113 and MA-1114, the total number of bands recorded as 30 distributed as: 11 polymorphic, 17 monomorphic, and two unique bands (Figure 4B). For the control, the total number of bands was 22 with no unique bands. Two lanes of 16 and 32 µM MA-1113 increased the total protein to 26 higher than control. The 21 minimum band numbers exposed at lanes of 16 and 32 µM MA-1114.

2.6. Changes in Cellular Ultrastructure of S. aureus Treated with One Sub-MIC of Fluoroarylbichalcophenes

Based on the results of antimicrobial activities, S. aureus was selected for scanning electron microscopy in the presence of the investigated fluoroarylbichalcophenes. The micrographs of the control untreated S. aureus cells showed their normal morphology as typical grapelike cluster arrangement. The cells were intact, around 1 µm in diameter and looked smooth rounded in shape (Figure 5A). On the other hand, after incubation with a sub-MIC, some bacteria exhibited different morphological abnormalities. Treatment with 4 µM of MA-1156 caused random aggregations of sticky cells having smaller size around 0.7 µm diameter with wavy cell walls. SEM micrographs of S. aureus cells treated with both 8 µM of MA-1115 and 16 µM of MA-1116 showed random clusters appeared to be smaller in diameter (0.5–0.8 µm) than the control sample. For treatment with 16 µM of MA-1116, linear arrangement was observed. In case of 32 µM of MA-1113 treatment, the cells of S. aureus exhibited abnormal shape of few numbered and smaller cells (nearly 0.8 µm in diameter) arranged in clusters with less width and length. Treatment with 32 µM of MA-1114 showed a decrease in cells number varying markedly in size and shape. Many cells were smaller (0.6–0.9 µm diameter) than usual (Figure 5).

2.7. Cell Viability Determination Using WST-1 Reagent

The effect of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes on the microbial activity was studied by monitoring the growth rate via optical density as a measure of the cell number. However, the rapid detection of these bichalcophenes antibacterial effects on the cell viability rather than the cell number is still needed. Therefore, WST-test was implemented. The reduction of tetrazolium salt WST-1 by the viable S. aureus cells results in a water-soluble yellow formazan, which can be easily quantified at the wavelength of 450 nm.
As depicted in Figure 6, S. aureus was most sensitive to MA-1156, since the cell viability was strongly inhibited over all concentrations (viability%: 7.4%, 3.5%, 3.2%, 0.8%, 0.6%, and 0). On the other hand, the sensitivity of S. aureus to MA-1114 was the lowest among the tested compounds as the treated S. aureus cells were viable over all concentrations except 128 µM at which the cells were not viable with 1.7% viability. For MA-1115, all concentrations were lethal to S. aureus cells except the lowest concentration 4 µM at which the bacterial cells were viable with 30% when the bacterial strain was treated. MA-1116 and MA-1113 had the same potent effect on S. aureus cells. Some concentrations 128, 64, and 32 µM were lethal, while the cells treated with 16, 8, and 4 µM were viable with percentage 44%, 27.6%, and 32% for MA-1116 and 58%, 35%, and 17% for MA-1113 respectively.

2.8. Sensing the Response of S. aureus Biofilms

The biofilm formed at the electrode surface (sensors surface) was used monitoring the S. aureus cell viability. From the obtained bioelectrochemcial signals, height of electric-current represents the high cell viability and fast electron transfer efficiency. Lowering the electric-current is reflecting the defects in biological functions of the living adhered cells at the electrode surface. Herein, the bioelectrochemical performances of the untreated S. aureus culture and fluoroarylbichalcophene treated cultures were recorded and analyzed. The results shown in Figure 7 demonstrate the inhibition effects on the formation of electrochemically active biofilm caused by the existence of fluorobichalcophenes in the microbial culture during the stage of biofilm formation.
As shown in Figure 7 the microbial-electrode interaction of S. aureus with the MnO2 nano-rods was measured in the presence of one sub-MIC concentration of the fluorobichalcophenes. To that end, the faradic current of treated S. aureus has much lower current values than the control untreated cells; 5 × 10−5 A for MA-1156, 2.5 × 10−5 A for MA-1115, 6.5 × 10−5 A for MA-1116, 5 × 10−5 A for MA-1113 and 2.5 × 10−5 A for MA-1114. However, the untreated cells of S. aureus produced reasonable and significant higher faradic current reached about 2.5 × 10−4 A. This clearly points to the strong sensitivity of S. aureus to the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes.

3. Discussion

The rapid and extensive development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a serious world-wide health problem. Therefore, continuous effort to develop novel and effective antimicrobial agents or increase the efficacy of the antibiotics currently in use by reducing the development of resistance in bacteria are highly needed [4]. Synthesized bichalcophene derivatives were found to have an efficient antimicrobial activity [8,9,10,11,12,22]. Bichalcophenes-based on thiophene and furan rings are recognized for their promising biological activity. The reported antimicrobial activity of the bichalcophenes can be attributed to the presence of sulfur and amidine functions [10,23]. In a previous study, bichalcophene derivatives were effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria like various broad-spectrum antibiotics; their mechanism(s) may possibly be through the inhibition of protein and/or nucleic acids synthesis [24], or bacterial DNA degradation [10].
In this study, all tested fluorobichalcophenes showed better antimicrobial activity than their corresponding parent compounds (1a and 1b) as the inhibition zone diameters of 1c to 1g compounds were from 15 to 20 mm against S. aureus. On the other hand, the inhibition zone diameters for parent compounds 1a and 1b were 14 and 15.5 mm, respectively. The compound MA-1156 showed the highest activity inhibiting S. aureus growth at minimum inhibitory concentration value of 16 µM. A possible explanation for this result is that the antibacterial activity of these compounds may stem from the basic skeleton of the molecules as well as from the nature of the fluorine, sulfur, and/or oxygen heteroatoms substituents. This finding was inconsistent with a previous study on some bichalcophene and their aza-analogs [10].
The biological activity of bichalcophenes could be enhanced through introducing fluorine atoms to the phenyl ring [12]. The addition of extra thiophene ring in the former compound is the only difference between compound MA-1156 and the other tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes. It cannot be denied that this additional thiophene rings is responsible for the impressive antibacterial activity. It was previously reported that compounds with thiophene rings were more active than those containing pyrrole or furan rings [8]. The low activity of MA-1156 in the preliminary experiment using disc diffusion technique compared to the other tested compounds could be explained as; MA-1156 may have lower diffusion ability or higher affinity to agar than the other tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes.
It was also reported that substitution of fluorine on the phenyl ring resulted in a significant improvement in the antiproliferative activity [25]. Similar findings were reported herein as the inhibition zone diameter and the MIC value are better enhanced when the fluorine atom is next to the bichalcophene moiety as in compounds MA-1115 and MA-1113 than their positional isomers MA-1116 and MA-1114, respectively, in which the fluorine atom is next to the amidine group leading to improve the ability of compounds to inhibit the bacterial activity. This go along with a previous study on compounds MA-1113 and MA-1114 reported by Abousalem et al. [26] that could be explained by terms of the replacement of fluorine resulting in the apparently orthogonal effects of increasing molecular hydrophobicity and local polarity, thus altering their pharmacokinetic properties [25,27].
During the present research, different fluoroarylbichalcophene resistance was formed with S. aureus at one-fold MIC concentration against the compound MA-1115 after three days’ incubation and MA-1114 after two days’ incubation whereas the bacteria could not develop any resistance at higher concentrations. Similar findings for some monocationic pyridyl bichalcophene compounds have been reported previously against E. coli which could develop resistance to these bichalcophenes and tetracycline at one-fold MIC concentration after only one day of incubation, whereas at three-fold MIC concentration, the bacteria could not develop any resistance even after the 7th day of incubation against nearly all bichalcophenes [11]. General protection is provided by abundant multidrug resistant pumps (MDRs) that involve membrane translocations to extrude toxins from the cell [28,29,30]. The preferred substrates of most MDRs are synthetic hydrophobic cations such as quaternary ammonium antiseptics [31,32]. Mutational events that lead to target alteration or activation of efflux pump mechanisms are the most reasonable explanation for their resistance [33].
From scanning electron microscopy, the untreated S. aureus micrograph showed normal morphology and typical grapelike cluster arrangement of S. aureus cells. While cells exposed to each of fluoroarylbichalcophenes undergo some ultra-structural changes as decreasing the number and size of cells around 0.5 µm, appearance of some deformities in the external shape of cell up to lyses of some cells. Moreover, the appearance of the bacterial cells treated with MA-1116 and MA-1113 compounds as streptococci or linear arrangement could be attributed to the division of cells in one direction. That goes along with a previous study of Staphylococci treated with cloxacillin where the progressive separation of the bacteria was in a manner fundamentally similar to that seen in streptococci [34].
The SDS-PAGE analysis showed qualitative changes in protein profile of S. aureus after treatment with the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes. Disappearance of protein bands have been attributed to the degradation of proteins by the antimicrobial agents whereas the appearance of new bands and/or the increasing in bands intensity could be due to the synthesis of responsive proteins that might resist the stress or help the bacteria to survive in stressful conditions [35]. Low molecular weight protein bands may be evolved from degradation of high molecular weight proteins [36]. The antimicrobial activity of these bichalcophenes could occur because the synthesis of protein and/or nucleic acids is inhibited [24,37,38].
The minimum percentage of viability results for S. aureus cells treated with MA-1156 were recognized at all tested concentrations where cells were unable to cleave WST-1 within 1 h of complement-mediated lysis so no formazan was formed. In contrast, the cells treated with MA-1114 showed the maximum percentage of viability as S. aureus cells were able to cleave WST-1 and form the formazan product at all except 128 µM (1.7%). WST-1 is cleaved by all living, metabolically active cells only, but not by dead cells. The amount of formazan generated is directly proportional to the cell number over a wide range, using a homogeneous cell population. Activated cells produce more formazan than resting cells, which could allow the measurement of activation. These properties are all consistent with the cleavage of WST-1 only by active cells [39]. Due to the microbial-catalytic oxidation of degradable organic compounds, electrons transmitted to a molecule other than oxygen under anaerobic conditions via the electron transport chain (ETC). Accepting the electrons results in the production of electrical current directly proportional to the total number of viable microbial cells and their activity. Dormant or dead cells, in contrast, have no electrochemical activity [40]. In the end, online monitoring of microbial responses and cell viability could be enabled to differentiate the living from the dead microbes [41,42]. Herein this study, the treated S. aureus cultures with the synthesized fluoroarylbichalcophenes, produce lower bioelectrochemical signals ranging from 2.5 to 6.5 × 10−5 A than the untreated cell which recorded 2.5 × 10−4 A. This sharp decrease points to the ability of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes to inhibit the direct electron transfer from viable bacterial cells to the carbon electrode. A previously measured S. aureus activity was electrochemically using a double-mediated bioelectrochemical system. The electrochemical signals were obtained only from the metabolically active cells, whereas an oxidation peak current was observed at about 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl, while the metabolically inactive cells showed almost no bioelectrochemical responses [43]. In the light of previously mentioned results, it could be concluded that the antibacterial activity of bichalcophene derivatives against S. aureus is enhanced due to the incorporation of fluorine atom.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Tested Bichalcophene Derivatives and Bacteria

Two non-fluorinated parent compounds; 1a and 1b and five fluorophenylbichalcophenes; 1c–1g (Figure 1) were available from previous studies [10,12] and provided by Professor M. A. Ismail. Their chemical names: 1a (4-(2,2′-bithiophene-5-yl) benzamidine); 1b (4-(2,2′-bifuran-5-yl) benzamidine); 1c (4-(2,2′-bithiophen-5-yl)-2-fluorobenamidine); 1d (2-fluoro-4-(5-(thiophen-2-yl) furan-2-yl) benzamidine); 1e (3-fluoro-4-(5-(thiophen -2-yl) furan-2-yl) benzamidine); 1f (4-(2,2′-bifuran-5-yl)-3-fluorobenzamidine); 1g (4-(2,2′-bifuran-5-yl)-2-fluorobenzamidine). The tested compounds were liquefied at 10 mM concentration in 1 mL absolute DMSO. S. aureus used in this study was multi-drug resistant bacteria as it was resistant to Oxacillin, Ciprofloxacin, Methicillin, Levofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Erythromycin and Ampicillin and sensitive to Cefoxitin and Gentamicin.

4.2. Detecting the Antimicrobial Activity of the Tested 2,2′-Bichalcophene Derivatives

Disc agar diffusion technique described by Bauer et al. [44] was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the bichalcophene compounds 1a–1g against S. aureus. The tested compounds were liquefied at 10 mM concentration in DMSO. Mueller-Hinton agar plates were inoculated separately with 107 CFU/mL of bacterial cultures and regularly spread on the whole surface of each plate. The 5 mm diameter sterile discs were saturated with 10 µL of the tested bichalcophene compounds and placed on LB plates inoculated with the tested microorganisms. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, after that inhibition zones were measured in millimeters and compared with a negative control 10% DMSO. Each assay in this test was conducted in three replicates.

4.3. Determination of MIC of the Tested 2,2′-Bichalcophene Derivatives

The MIC of bichalcophene derivatives was measured according to the processes described by Clinical and Laboratory Standards [45]. Different concentrations (0–128 μM) of the tested bichalcophenes dissolved in DMSO were added independently to LB broth medium which was previously autoclaved. For the current assay, prepared LB culture of S. aureus was chosen. A 20 μL seed culture of the tested organism having nearly 5 × 104 colony forming units (≈0.5 OD) was used as an inoculum for testing the bichalcophene derivatives. Respective blanks (culture and broth alone) were preserved, subsequently. All tubes were incubated overnight at 37 °C and measured at 600 nm optical density. Experiments were performed as triplicates.

4.4. Detection of Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophenes-Resistant Variants

In order to evaluate the development of resistance in S. aureus against fluoroarylbichalcophenes, growth assays were performed in the presence or absence of each bichalcophene derivative. 20 mL of cells were centrifuged, and the cells were re-suspended in 2 mL of MHB (Mueller-Hinton broth). The inoculum density was adjusted to 108 CFU/mL. Different concentrations of each tested bichalcophene derivative (3×, 2×, 1× MIC) were added. All tubes were incubated at 37 °C and the absorbance was recorded at 600 nm daily over a period of seven days [33].

4.5. SDS-PAGE of S. aureus

S. aureus samples treated with the tested fluoroarylbichalcophene derivatives and the untreated sample (control) were cultured in LB broth media at 37 °C and 120 rpm for 24 h. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The pellets were homogenized in phosphate buffer (0.6 M, pH 6.8) using glass beads and FastPrep®-24 homogenizer and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min for protein isolation [46]. Ten µg protein samples were boiled into 2× sample buffer (10 mL Distilled Water, 2.5 mL Tris HCl pH 6.8, 2 mL glycerol, 4 mL of 10% SDS and 1 mL β-mercaptoethanol) for 2 min. Around 20 µL treated proteins were loaded over acrylamide gel. Acrylamide gel was prepared according to Laemmli [47] from two layers; 4% stacking gel on top of 12% separating gel. After electrophoresis at 100 V for 2 h, a gel was overnight stained in Commassie brilliant blue R250 and visualized by soaking in destaining solution on shaker for some hours. The gel was documented and analyzed using the gel analyzer3 program.

4.6. SEM

Cells of S. aureus treated with the sub-MIC of each tested fluoroarylbichalcophene, MA-1156 (4 µM), MA-1115 (8 µM), MA-1116 (16 µM), MA-1113, and MA-1114 (32 µM) were subjected to SEM microscopy (JSM-6510 L.V., Tokyo, Japan). The bacteria were incubated for 12 h in incubator at 37 °C in LB broth containing the sub-MIC of fluoroarylbichalcophenes besides the untreated one (control). The pellets of bacterial cells were harvested from 10 mL of each sample by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and processed according to Hartmann et al. [48]. The specimens were coated with gold-palladium membranes and examined by SEM microscope using 30 KV at EM Unit, Mansoura University, Egypt.

4.7. Cell Viability Determination Using WST-1 Reagent

The cell density of the selected strain S. aureus was quantified by measuring the viability of the cells using WST-1 reagent according to Mosmann [49,50]. Starting at 0-incubation time, whereas 4 mL sterilized LB media amended different concentrations (0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 µM) for all fluoroarylbichalcophenes. A 1 mL inoculum seed culture of S. aureus was added and incubated in a shaker at 650 rpm for 30 min at 37 °C. Consequently, 20 μL of 10 mM WST-1 solution was added per tube then shacked for (1–2) min, afterwards, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured and considered as zero time. Further incubation of the treated microbial cultured with fluorobichalcophene derivatives and WST reagent for another 30 min before re-measuring the absorbance at the same wavelength [49]. The overall cell viability percentage was calculated as the following equation:
Cell viability% = (absorbance value of treated cells)/(absorbance value of untreated cells) × 100

4.8. Bioelectrochemical Measurements

All electrochemical experiments were performed utilizing a three-electrode Gamry Potentiostat/Galvanostat/ZRA G750 system known as a voltammetry. The working electrode was electrochemically activated by applying five cyclic scans from −0.4 to 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, with the scan rate of 50 mV/s in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) as a supporting electrolyte. The basic concept of this assay relies on the direct electron transfer from living microbial cells that physically adhere to the electrode surface [39,51].
To investigate the response of S. aureus cells to the targeted fluorobichalcophenes, a suspension of S. aureus was incubated with one sub-MIC concentration of each compound; 4 µM of MA-1156, 8 µM of MA-1115, 16 µM of MA-1116 and 32 µM of both MA-1113 and MA-1114 at 37 °C for two weeks to form biofilm by attaching microbial cells at the screen printed electrode and measure current by measuring the bioelectrochemical responses of the treated cells. The cyclic voltammograms were recorded at different time intervals to monitor the online growing of the biofilms on the modified electrode surfaces and to detect the effect of the fluoroarylbichalcophenes on the electron transfer from the adhered bacterial cells and the working electrode surface. The resulting curve is called a voltammogram, whereas electric potential and electric currents are plotted on the X and Y axes, respectively.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

For the goals of this study, all assays were performed in triplicate in three independent experiments. Statistical analysis results were expressed as means ± S.E. (standard error).

5. Conclusions

MA-1156 was the most effective monocationic fluoroaryl bichalcophene compound for inhibiting the microbial growth and could be used as an effective antimicrobial agent for living tissues.

Author Contributions

A.E., M.A.I., and R.Y.A.H. suggested the work protocol, interpreted the results and revised the manuscript; S.E. performed the laboratory experiments, and prepared the manuscript; A.N., H.D., E.F., F.E. for funding acquisition, resources and data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current work was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP—2020/141), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Taif University for funding this work through Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP - 2020/141), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trémolières, F.J.M. When the antibiotic miracle turns into a nightmare. Med. Sci. 2010, 26, 925–929. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kennedy, B.; O’Connor, B.; Korn, B.; Lyons, O.; Gargoum, F.; Gibbons, N.; O’Connor, T.; Keane, J. Multi-drug Resistant Tuberculosis; Early Experiences of Two Irish Tertiary Referral Centres. Ir. Med. J. 2011, 26, 925–929. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kutty, N. Treating Children without Antibiotics in Primary Healthcare. Oman Med. J. 2011, 26, 303–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Elsayed, A.; Mohamedin, A.; Ata, T.; Ghazala, N. Molecular characterization of multidrug resistant clinical Escherichia coli isolates. Am. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 6, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vitaku, E.; Smith, D.T.; Njardarson, J.T. Analysis of the structural diversity, substitution patterns, and frequency of nitrogen heterocycles among us FDA approved pharmaceuticals: Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10257–10274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ismail, M.; El-Sayed, W.; Shaaban, S.; Abdelwahab, G.; Hamama, W. A Review of Cationic Arylfurans and Their Isosteres: Synthesis and Biological Importance. Curr. Org. Chem. 2019, 23, 2751–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ismail, M.A.; Negm, A.; Arafa, R.K.; Abdel-Latif, E.; El-Sayed, W.M. Anticancer activity, dual prooxidant/antioxidant effect and apoptosis induction profile of new bichalcophene-5-carboxamidines. Eur. J. Med.Chem. 2019, 169, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boschi, D.; Guglielmo, S.; Aiello, S.; Morace, G.; Borghi, E.; Fruttero, R.J. Synthesis and in vitro antimicrobial activities of new (cyano-NNO-azoxy) pyrazole derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 3431–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. El-Sayed, W.M.; Hussin, W.A.; Ismail, M.A. Efficacy of two novel 2,2′-bifurans to inhibit methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in male mice in comparison to vancomycin. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2012, 6, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Youssef, M.M.; Al-Omair, M.A.; Ismail, M.A. Synthesis, DNA affinity, and antimicrobial activity of 4-substituted phenyl-2,2′-bichalcophenes and aza-analogues. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 21, 4074–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hussin, W.A.; Ismail, M.A.; El-Sayed, W.M. Novel 4-substituted phenyl-2,2′-bichalcophenes and aza-analogs as antibacterial agents: A structural activity relationship. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2013, 7, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hussin, W.A.; Ismail, M.A.; Alzahrani, A.M.; El-Sayed, W.M. Evaluation of the biological activity of novel monocationic fluoroaryl-2,2′-bichalcophenes and their analogues. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2014, 8, 963–972. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ismail, M.A.; Arafa, R.K.; Youssef, M.M.; El-Sayed, W.M. Anticancer, antioxidant activities, and DNA affinity of novel monocationic bithiophenes and analogues. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2014, 8, 1659–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Park, B.K.; Kitteringham, N.R.; O’Neill, P.M. Metabolism of fluorine-containing drugs. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 443–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kato, T.-A.; Hakura, A.; Mizutani, T.; Saeki, K.-I. Anti-mutagenic structural modification by fluorine-substitution in highly mutagenic 4-methylquinoline derivatives. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2000, 465, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diamond, L.; Cherian, K.; Harvey, R.G.; DiGiovanni, J. Mutagenic activity of methyl-and fluoro-substituted derivatives of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a human hepatoma (HepG2) cell-mediated assay. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. 1984, 136, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hirao, K.; Shinohara, Y.; Tsuda, H.; Fukushima, S.; Takahashi, M. Carcinogenic activity of quinoline on rat liver. Cancer Res. 1976, 36, 329–335. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shinohara, Y.; Ogiso, T.; Hananouchi, M.; Nakanishi, K.; Yoshimura, T.; Ito, N. Effect of various factors on the induction of liver tumors in animals by quinoline. GANN Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1977, 68, 785–796. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nagao, M.; Yahagi, T.; Seino, Y.; Sugimura, T.; Ito, N. Mutagenicities of quinoline and its derivatives. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1977, 42, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamiya, M.; Sengoku, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Kohda, K.; Kawazoe, Y. Antimutagenic structure modification of quinoline: Fluorine-substitution at position-3. In Antimutagenesis and Anticarcinogenesis Mechanisms II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1990; pp. 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  21. Miyata, Y.; Saeki, K.-i.; Kawazoe, Y.; Hayashi, M.; Sofuni, T.; Suzuki, T. Antimutagenic structural modification of quinoline assessed by an in vivo mutagenesis assay using lacZ-transgenic mice. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 1998, 414, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, Z.-P.; He, X.-B.; Peng, Z.-Y.; Xiong, T.-J.; Peng, J.; Chen, L.-H.; Zhu, H. Synthesis, structure, molecular docking, and structure–activity relationship analysis of enamines: 3-Aryl-4-alkylaminofuran-2(5H)-ones as potential antibacterials. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thebault, P.; De Givenchy, E.T.; Levy, R.; Vandenberghe, Y.; Guittard, F.; Géribaldi, S. Preparation and antimicrobial behaviour of quaternary ammonium thiol derivatives able to be grafted on metal surfaces. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wood, K.; Nishida, S.; Sontag, E.D.; Cluzel, P. Mechanism-independent method for predicting response to multidrug combinations in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12254–12259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. DiMagno, S.G.; Sun, H. The strength of weak interactions: Aromatic fluorine in drug design. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abousalem, A.S.; Ismail, M.A.; Fouda, A.S. A complementary experimental and in silico studies on the action of fluorophenyl-2, 2′-bichalcophenes as ecofriendly corrosion inhibitors and biocide agents. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 276, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Biffinger, J.C.; Kim, H.W.; DiMagno, S.G. The polar hydrophobicity of fluorinated compounds. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Paulsen, I.T.; Brown, M.H.; Skurray, R.A. Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60, 575–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lolkema, J.S.; Poolman, B.; Konings, W.N. Bacterial solute uptake and efflux systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998, 1, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nikaido, H. Multiple antibiotic resistance and efflux. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1998, 1, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hsieh, P.-C.; Siegel, S.A.; Rogers, B.; Davis, D.; Lewis, K. Bacteria lacking a multidrug pump: A sensitive tool for drug discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 6602–6606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lewis, K. Multidrug resistance: Versatile drug sensors of bacterial cells. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, R403–R407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pillai, S.P.; Pillai, C.A.; Shankel, D.M.; Mitscher, L.A.J.M.R.G.T.; Mutagenesis, E. The ability of certain antimutagenic agents to prevent development of antibiotic resistance. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2001, 496, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greenwood, D.; O’Grady, F. Scanning Electron Microscopy of Staphylococcus aureus Exposed to Some Common Anti-staphylococcal Agents. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1972, 70, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Booyens, J.; Labuschagne, M.C.; Thantsha, M.S. In Vitro Antibacterial Mechanism of Action of Crude Garlic (Allium sativum) Clove Extract on Selected Probiotic Bifidobacterium Species as Revealed by SEM, TEM, and SDS-PAGE Analysis. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2014, 6, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kaur, I.P.; Chopra, K.; Saini, A. Probiotics: Potential pharmaceutical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Depauw, S.; Lambert, M.; Jambon, S.; Paul, A.; Peixoto, P.; Nhili, R.; Marongiu, L.; Figeac, M.; Dassi, C.; Paul-Constant, C.; et al. Heterocyclic Diamidine DNA Ligands as HOXA9 Transcription Factor Inhibitors: Design, Molecular Evaluation, and Cellular Consequences in a HOXA9-Dependant Leukemia Cell Model. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 1306–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nhili, R.; Peixoto, P.; Depauw, S.; Flajollet, S.; Dezitter, X.; Munde, M.M.; Ismail, M.A.; Kumar, A.; Farahat, A.A.; Stephens, C.E.; et al. Targeting the DNA-binding activity of the human ERG transcription factor using new heterocyclic dithiophene diamidines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hassan, R.Y.A.; Bilitewski, U. Direct electrochemical determination of Candida albicans activity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 49, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khater, D.Z.; El-Khatib, K.M.; Hazaa, M.M.; Hassan, R.Y.A. Development of Bioelectrochemical System for Monitoring the Biodegradation Performance of Activated Sludge. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 175, 3519–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hassan, R.Y.A.; Bilitewski, U. A viability assay for Candida albicans based on the electron transfer mediator 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 419, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sedki, M.; Hassan, R.Y.A.; Andreescu, S.; El-Sherbiny, I.M. Online-monitoring of biofilm formation using nanostructured electrode surfaces. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hassan, D.F.; Mahmood, M.B. Biosynthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Using Escherichia coli. Iraqi J. Sci. 2019, 453–459. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bauer, A.; Kirby, W.; Sherris, J.; Tursk, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard; M7–A7; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  46. Soliman, H.; Elsayed, A.; Dyaa, A. Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles biosynthesised by Rhodotorula sp. strain ATL72. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hartmann, M.; Berditsch, M.; Hawecker, J.; Ardakani, M.F.; Gerthsen, D.; Ulrich, A.S. Damage of the Bacterial Cell Envelope by Antimicrobial Peptides Gramicidin S and PGLa as Revealed by Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3132–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuhn, D.M.; Balkis, M.; Chandra, J.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Ghannoum, M.A. Uses and Limitations of the XTT Assay in Studies of Candida Growth and Metabolism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 506–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sedki, M.; Hefnawy, A.; Hassan, R.Y.A.; El-Sherbiny, I.M. Core-shell hyperbranched chitosan nanostructure as a novel electrode modifier. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 00139 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of monocationic bichalcophene derivatives.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of monocationic bichalcophene derivatives.
Molecules 26 00139 g001
Molecules 26 00139 g002 550
Figure 2. Susceptibility of S. aureus towards bichalcophenes, on Mueller–Hinton agar medium incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. (A) DMSO, (B) MA-1113, (C) MA-1114, (D) MA-1115, (E) MA-1116, (F) MA-1156, (G) MA-0944, (H) MA-0947. Note: The results expressed as zone inhibition in mm diameter. Assays were performed in triplicate exposing the mean (mean ± SE). Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
Figure 2. Susceptibility of S. aureus towards bichalcophenes, on Mueller–Hinton agar medium incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. (A) DMSO, (B) MA-1113, (C) MA-1114, (D) MA-1115, (E) MA-1116, (F) MA-1156, (G) MA-0944, (H) MA-0947. Note: The results expressed as zone inhibition in mm diameter. Assays were performed in triplicate exposing the mean (mean ± SE). Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
Molecules 26 00139 g002
Molecules 26 00139 g003 550
Figure 3. Development of resistance by S. aureus in the presence of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes at (3, 2, and 1× MIC) during 7 days of incubation. (A) MA-1156 compound; (B) MA-1115 compound; (C) MA-1116; (D) MA-1113; (E) MA-1114.
Figure 3. Development of resistance by S. aureus in the presence of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes at (3, 2, and 1× MIC) during 7 days of incubation. (A) MA-1156 compound; (B) MA-1115 compound; (C) MA-1116; (D) MA-1113; (E) MA-1114.
Molecules 26 00139 g003
Molecules 26 00139 g004 550
Figure 4. Protein pattern of S. aureus cultivated on Luria–Bertani (LB) broth media, (A) treated with MA-1156 (2 and 4 µM), MA-1115 (4 and 8 µM) and MA-1116 (16 and 32 µM) M = marker, C = control or untreated bacteria; (B) treated with MA-1113 (16 and 32 µM) and MA-1114 (16 and 32 µM).
Figure 4. Protein pattern of S. aureus cultivated on Luria–Bertani (LB) broth media, (A) treated with MA-1156 (2 and 4 µM), MA-1115 (4 and 8 µM) and MA-1116 (16 and 32 µM) M = marker, C = control or untreated bacteria; (B) treated with MA-1113 (16 and 32 µM) and MA-1114 (16 and 32 µM).
Molecules 26 00139 g004
Molecules 26 00139 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of control S. aureus cells (A) S. aureus cells treated with MA-1156 (B), MA-1115 (C), MA-1116 (D), MA-1113 (E) and MA-1114 (F).
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of control S. aureus cells (A) S. aureus cells treated with MA-1156 (B), MA-1115 (C), MA-1116 (D), MA-1113 (E) and MA-1114 (F).
Molecules 26 00139 g005
Molecules 26 00139 g006 550
Figure 6. Testing the cell viability of S. aureus treated with the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes at different concentrations (0–128 µM) using the WST1-test (A) compound MA-1156; (B) compound MA-1115; (C) compound MA-1116; (D) compound MA-1113; (E) compound MA-1114.
Figure 6. Testing the cell viability of S. aureus treated with the tested fluoroarylbichalcophenes at different concentrations (0–128 µM) using the WST1-test (A) compound MA-1156; (B) compound MA-1115; (C) compound MA-1116; (D) compound MA-1113; (E) compound MA-1114.
Molecules 26 00139 g006
Molecules 26 00139 g007 550
Figure 7. Bioelectrochemical responses of untreated vs. treated S. aureus biofilms with one concentration of each fluoroarylbichalcophenes.
Figure 7. Bioelectrochemical responses of untreated vs. treated S. aureus biofilms with one concentration of each fluoroarylbichalcophenes.
Molecules 26 00139 g007
Table
Table 1. Inhibitory effect of monocationic bichalcophenes on S. aureus.
Table 1. Inhibitory effect of monocationic bichalcophenes on S. aureus.
Tested Compound (10 mM)Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm)
MA-0944 (1a)14 ± 0.2
MA-0947 (1b)15.5 ± 0.0
MA-1156 (1c)15 ± 0.2
MA-1115 (1d)20 ± 0.2
MA-1116 (1e)16 ± 0.2
MA-1113 (1f)16 ± 0.1
MA-1114 (1g)20 ± 0.2
Table
Table 2. Determination of the MIC, and MBC (µM) of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophene derivatives (1a–1g) against S. aureus.
Table 2. Determination of the MIC, and MBC (µM) of the tested fluoroarylbichalcophene derivatives (1a–1g) against S. aureus.
CompoundMIC (µM)MBC
MA-0944 (1a)128not detected
MA-0947 (1b)128not detected
MA-1156 (1c)1616
MA-1115 (1d)3232
MA-1116 (1e)64128
MA-1113 (1f)128128
MA-1114 (1g)128128
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elmogy, S.; Ismail, M.A.; Hassan, R.Y.A.; Noureldeen, A.; Darwish, H.; Fayad, E.; Elsaid, F.; Elsayed, A. Biological Insights of Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Compounds on Multi-Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2021, 26, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010139

AMA Style

Elmogy S, Ismail MA, Hassan RYA, Noureldeen A, Darwish H, Fayad E, Elsaid F, Elsayed A. Biological Insights of Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Compounds on Multi-Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules. 2021; 26(1):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elmogy, Sally, Mohamed A. Ismail, Rabeay Y. A. Hassan, Ahmed Noureldeen, Hadeer Darwish, Eman Fayad, Fahmy Elsaid, and Ashraf Elsayed. 2021. "Biological Insights of Fluoroaryl-2,2′-Bichalcophene Compounds on Multi-Drug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus" Molecules 26, no. 1: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010139

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop