Next Article in Journal
Revisiting the Self-Assembly of Highly Aromatic Phenylalanine Homopeptides
Previous Article in Journal
New Application of 1,2,4-Triazole Derivatives as Antitubercular Agents. Structure, In Vitro Screening and Docking Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Cyclic Diarylheptanoids from Platycarya strobilacea

1
Hunan Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center for Biopesticide and Formulation Processing, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Utilization of Botanical Functional Ingredients, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
Hunnan Cotton Science Institute, Changde 415100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(24), 6034; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25246034
Submission received: 22 November 2020 / Revised: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 16 December 2020 / Published: 20 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Five new cyclic diarylheptanoids (platycary A–E, compounds 15) and three previously identified analogues (i.e., phttyearynol (compound 6), myricatomentogenin (compound 7), and juglanin D (compound 8)) were isolated from the stem bark of Platycarya strobilacea. The structures of these compounds were determined using NMR, HRESIMS, and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) data. The cytotoxicity of compounds 15 and their ability to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production, as well as protect against the corticosterone-induced apoptosis of Pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells, were evaluated in vitro using the appropriate bioassays. Compounds 1 and 2 significantly inhibited the corticosterone-induced apoptosis of PC12 cells at a concentration of 20 μΜ.

1. Introduction

More than 500 diarylheptanoids, an important class of plant secondary metabolites with a aryl-C7-aryl skeleton (linear or cyclic type), have been isolated from a number of plant families, including the Aceraceae, Actinidiaceae, Betulaceae, Burseraceae, Casuarinaceae, Zingiberaceae Leguminosae, Myricaceae, and Juglandaceae [1]. Cyclic diarylheptanoids are further divided into meta,meta-bridged biphenyls and meta,para-bridged diphenyl ether heptanoids, many of which have beneficial biological activities such as anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, estrogenic, anti-amyloidogenic, and anti-emetic activity [1,2]. Hence, the discovery of new natural diarylheptanoids and their phytochemical characterization is of considerable potential benefit to medical science. Platycarya strobilacea Sieb. et Zucc. (Juglandaceae) is a deciduous shrubby tree distributed in East Asia [3]. Previous phytochemical studies have found that this species contains large amounts of ellagitannins [4], flavonoids [5], and sesquiterpenoids [6,7], but apparently only one cyclic diarylheptanoid (i.e., platycarynol) [8]. Since a number of cyclic diarylheptanoids have been isolated from many species of Juglandaceae, in this paper we described the results of an extensive investigation of the stem bark of P. strobilacea in which eight cyclic diarylheptanoids, including five new ones (compounds 15), were isolated and identified. Furthermore, the anti-tumor cytotoxic activity of the five new isolates, and their ability to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production and the corticosterone-induced apoptosis of PC12 cells, was evaluated in vitro.

2. Results and Discussion

A 95% EtOH extract of the stem bark of P. strobilacea was subjected to column chromatography (CC) over silica gel, Sephadex LH-20, and pre-TLC to afford compounds 18. The structures of the known compounds phttyearynol (6), myricatomentogenin (7), and juglanin D (8) were determined by spectral data analysis and comparison with published data (Figure 1) [8,9,10].
Compound 1 was isolated as a white solid. Its molecular formula was assigned as C19H20O5 by the HRESIMS (m/z 327.1234 [M − H], calcd for C19H19O5, 327.1232). The 13C-NMR spectrum exhibited 19 carbon signals including characteristic peaks of a carbonyl group and 12 aromatic carbons (see the Supplementary Materials); the other carbons were identified using the HSQC spectrum as an oxymethine and five methylene (Table 1 and Table 2). Detailed analysis using 2D NMR spectra revealed a heptanoid chain (–1-CH2–2-CH2OH–3-(C=O)–4-CH2–5-CH2–6-CH2–7-CH2–) moiety established by the 1H-1H COSY cross peaks of H-1/H-2, H-4/H-5, H-5/H-6, and H-6/H-7, as well as the Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) cross peaks of H-1/C-3, H-2/C-3, H-2/C-4, and H-5/C-3. In the 1H-NMR spectrum, six aromatic proton signals at δH 6.57 (dd, J = 8.1, 2.1 Hz, H-6′), 5.72 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-2′), 6.72 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-5′), 6.82 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2″), 6.77 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, H-6″), and 6.83 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-5″) revealed the presence of two 1,3,4-trisubstituted aromatic rings that were ABX coupling patterns. The chemical shift of H-2′ at 5.72 ppm appeared highly upfield from other aromatic proton signals, and such a shielding effect is characteristic of biaryl-type cyclic diarylheptanoids that have an ether linkage between C-3′ and C-4″ [2,8,11]. The above information suggests that compound 1 is 2-hydroxy-3′,4″-epoxy-1-(4′-hydroxyphenyl)-7-(3″-hydroxyphenyl)-3-heptanone. The cross-peaks between H-1 and C-1′, C-2′, and C-6′, and those between H-7 and C-1″, C-2″, and C-6″ in the HMBC spectrum confirmed the linkages of the heptanoid chain with two benzene rings. For the absolute configuration of the hydroxyl group at C-2, the theoretical calculations of electronic circular dichroism (ECD) for R and S-conformers were conducted in MeOH using TD-DFT at the B3LYP/6-31+g (d, p) level (performed using the Gaussian 09 program) [12]. The experimental ECD spectrum of compound 1 was compared with what was calculated using this method (Figure 2) and was determined to be a good match to the 2S-configuration. Moreover, the positive optical rotation ((α) D 25 + 143.33 (c 0.06, MeOH)) of compound 1 was opposite to that of 2(R)-hydroxy-3′,4″-epoxy-1-(4′-hydroxyphenyl)-7-(3″-methoxylphenyl)-3-heptanone ((α) D 25 − 81.13(c 0.03, MeOH)), a very similar structure previously isolated from the roots of Juglans mandshurica [11]. Therefore, the structure of compound 1 was determined (Figure 1) and named platycary A.
Compound 2 was isolated as a white solid. Its molecular formula was assigned as C19H18O5 by the HRESIMS (m/z 325.1073 [M − H], calcd for C19H17O5, 325.1076). Its 13C-NMR spectrum exhibited a total of 19 carbon signals, including the characteristic peaks of a carbonyl group, a hydroxyl carbon, and 12 aromatic carbons as seen in compound 1, and two groups of ABX patterns aromatic proton signals including the highly upfield H-2′ (δH 5.57, br s), which was also observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum. These spectroscopic characteristics suggest that compound 2 is a biaryl-type cyclic diaryheptanoid. However, rather than the two methylene signals found in compound 1, two additional cis-olefinic proton signals at δH 6.75 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, H-7) and 5.99 (dt, J = 11.2, 7.2 Hz, H-6), as well as the corresponding carbon signals at 132.2 and 133.2 ppm, were apparent in compound 2. Further detailed analysis of compound 2 using 2D NMR spectra indicated a different heptanoid chain (-1-CH2–2-CH2OH–3-(C=O)–4-CH2–5-CH2–6-CH=7-CH–). The double bond at C-6 and C-7 was established by the 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-4/H-5, H-5/H-6, H-6/H-7, and the HMBC correlations of H-6/C-1″ and H-7/C-1″, C-2″, C-6″. Moreover, the absolute configuration of C-2 was assigned to be S by comparison with ECD cotton effects (Figure 3). Finally, the structure of compound 2 was proposed and named platycary B.
Compound 3 has the molecular formula C19H18O4, determined from HRESIMS and NMR data. The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3 was very similar to that of compound 2, with the same upfield aromatic signal of H-2′ (δH 5.38, d) and the ABX coupling pattern due to two sets of 1,3,4-trisubstituted aromatic groups. However, in compound 3, the hydroxyl carbon signal (δC 76.6, C-2 in compound 2) of the heptanoid was replaced by a methylene signal (δC 40.8, C-2). Cross-peaks in the 1H-1H COSY and HMBC spectra indicate connectivity from H-1 to H-7, creating a straight chain of the hept-6-en-3-one moiety. Moreover, the linkages of this chain to the two benzene rings were established by the HMBC cross-peaks of H-1/C-1′, C-2′, and C-6′, as well as those H-7/C-1″, C-2″, and C-6″. Thus, the structure of compound 3 was determined (as shown in Figure 1) and named platycary C.
Compound 4 has the molecular formula C20H20O4, determined from HRESIMS and NMR data. Its 1H and 13C-NMR data (Table 1 and Table 2) are quite similar to that of compound 3, except for an additional methoxyl moiety (δC 56.1), and slight differences in the chemical shifts of C-3′, C-4′, and C-5′ that hint to the linkage site of the methoxyl group. The HMBC correlations between -OCH3 and C-4′ further verified that the methoxyl group was located at C-4′. Therefore, the structure of compound 4 was proposed and named platycary D.
Compound 5 was isolated as white needle-shaped crystals. Its molecular formula was deduced to be C20H20O5 using HRESIMS (m/z 339.1232 [M − H], calcd for 339.1232). The 1H and 13C-NMR spectra of compound 5 (Table 1 and Table 2) exhibited characteristic signals of a carbonyl group, a methoxyl group, and two 1,3,4-trisubstituted phenyl groups (as were also apparent for compound 4), while the difference between compound 5 and compound 4 was the heptanoid chain. Detailed analysis of the NMR data of compound 5 revealed two new signals at δC 55.9 and 56.2 ppm, which are typical indicators of epoxide functionality [13,14], whereas two olefinic carbons (δC 131.6 and 131.9) were present in compound 4. The expected 6,7-epoxy-heptan-3-one moiety was established using 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations. In addition, the linkage site of the methoxyl group was assigned to C-3″ by the HMBC correlation of OCH3/C-3″. The relative stereochemistry of the epoxide was determined as cis based on the coupling constant between H-6 and H-7 (J = 4.3 Hz) (13,14), which was confirmed by a strong cross peak between H-6 and H-7 in the NOESY spectrum. Therefore, the structure of compound 5 was proposed and named platycary E.
Previously, Jahng and Park (2018) summarized series of cyclic diaryl ether heptanoids and their biological properties. Some of these compounds showed cytotoxic activities against human cancer cell lines, nitric oxide (NO) production inhibitory activity, neuroprotective activity, radical scavenging activity, and osteogenic activity [2]. In view of the valuable pharmacological activities of cyclic diarylheptanoids, we tested the cytotoxic activity of compounds 15 against human cancer cell lines (including HL-60, A549, SMMC-7721, MCF-7, and SW480), and their ability to inhibit NO production in Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activated murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells and protective effect of corticosterone-induced apoptosis in Pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. The results indicated that none of the five compounds showed cytotoxic activities (at 40 μM) or inhibited NO production (at 50 μM). However, compounds 1 and 2 significantly inhibited the corticosterone-induced apoptosis of PC12 cells at the concentration of 20 μΜ (Figure 4). The PC12 cell line is the most commonly used neuronal cell line for neuroscience research in vitro studies. A previous study indicated that corticosterone (CORT) at high concentrations induces cell injury and cell death in PC12 cells, and desipramine (DIM) can antagonize the neurotoxicity caused by CORT [15]. Our report indicated that compounds 1 and 2 are two potential cytoprotective agents for neurological diseases associated with corticosterone-induced neurotoxicity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General

Melting points were obtained on a SGW X-4 micro melting point apparatus (INESA Co., Shanghai, China). Optical rotations were measured on a SGW-533 automatic polarimeter (INESA Co., Shanghai, China). The 1D and 2D NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker DRX-600 instrument (Bruker BioS-pin GmbH Company, Rheinstetten, Germany) with TMS as the internal standard. ESIMS data were recorded on an API QSTAR mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystem/MSD Sciex, Concord, Ontario, Canada); HRESIMS were recorded on a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTof mass spectrometer (USA). ECD spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-810 circular dichroism (CD) spectropolarimeter (JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (100–200 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China), sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), and Develosil ODS (50 μm, Nomura Chemical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The preparation of TLC was performed on HSGF254 plates (Jiangyou silicone Development Co., Ltd., Yantai, China).

3.2. Plant Material

The stem bark of P. strobilacea was collected from Cili county, Hunan Province, P.R. China (29°42′ N and 111°13′ E) in August 2018, and identified by Professor Zhang Dai-gui (Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Jishou University). A voucher specimen (zdg20180809) was deposited at the College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Dried barks of P. strobilacea (12.5 kg) were powdered and extracted three times with EtOH (95% v/v) at room temperature, then concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain a crude residue (1.8 kg). The residue was suspended in H2O (4 L) and then extracted with petroleum ether (PE) and EtOAc successively, to yield a PE-soluble fraction (35.0 g) and an EtOAc-soluble fraction (95.0 g). The EtOAc-soluble fraction was further subjected to silica gel CC (100–200 mesh) with elution of CHCl3-MeOH (100:0 → 60:40, v/v) to give seven fractions (Fr. A–G). Fr.B (5.7 g) was decolorized on MCI gel (eluted with 90 % MeOH) and then chromatographed on an ODS-C18 column that eluted with acetone-H2O (3:7→10:0, v/v) to afford 10 sub-fractions (B1−B10). After TLC detection, sub-fractions B5, B6, B7, B9, and B10 with clear spots were further purified by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography (eluted with MeOH). Compounds 5 (15.2 mg), 6 (23.7 mg) and 8 (10.8 mg) were obtained from sub-fractions B5, B6, and B10 by preparation TLC using CHCl3-MeOH (95:5) as a developing solvent, respectively. Compounds 7 (20.5 mg) and 3 (117.8 mg) were obtained from sub-fractions B7 via methanol recrystallization, while compound 4 (50.8 mg) was yielded from sub-fraction B9 via recrystallization (CHCl3-MeOH, 1:1 v/v). Similarly, Fr.C (6.4 g) was successively subjected on MCI gel and ODS-C18 column to afford 10 sub-fractions (C1−C10). Compounds 1 (27.9 mg) and 2 (8.0 mg) were obtained from sub-fractions C6 using methanol recrystallization and the prepared TLC using CHCl3-MeOH (95:5) as a developing solvent.

3.4. Characterization of Compounds 15

Compound 1: white solid, m.p. 183 °C, (α) D 25 +143.33 (c 0.06, MeOH); ECD data (MeOH): Δε (nm) = −20.71 (207), +67.18 (226), +20.25 (283). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD) spectroscopic data, see Table 1 and Table 2; positive ion ESIMS m/z: 329 [M + H]+, negative ESIMS m/z: 327 [M − H], 363 [M + Cl] HRESIMS m/z: 327.1234 [M − H] (calcd for C19H19O5, 327.1232).
Compound 2: white solid, m.p. 194 °C, (α) D 25 +103.33 (c 0.12, MeOH); ECD data (MeOH): Δε (nm) = −80.68 (218), +67.63 (240), +41 (288). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD) spectroscopic data, see Table 1 and Table 2; positive ion ESIMS m/z: 327 [M + H]+, negative ESIMS m/z: 325 [M − H], 361 [M + Cl] HRESIMS m/z: 325.1073 [M − H] (calcd for C19H17O5, 325.1076).
Compound 3: colorless crystal, m.p. 135 °C; 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD) spectroscopic data, see Table 1 and Table 2; positive ion ESIMS m/z: 311 [M + H]+, negative ESIMS m/z: 309 [M − H] ; HRESIMS m/z: 309.1129 [M − H] (calcd for C19H17O4, 309.1127).
Compound 4: colorless crystal, m.p. 119 °C; 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) spectroscopic data (Table 1 and Table 2); 325 [M + H]+, 347 (M + Na]+; negative ESIMS m/z: 323 [M − H], 359 [M + Cl]; HRESIMS m/z: 323.1280 [M − H] (calcd for C20H19O4, 323.1283).
Compound 5: white needle-shaped crystal, m.p. 222 °C; 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) spectroscopic data (Table 1 and Table 2); 341 [M + H]+; negative ESIMS m/z: 339 [M − H], 375 [M + Cl]; HRESIMS m/z: 339.1232 [M − H] (calcd for C20H19O5, 339.1232).

3.5. Determination of Biological Activity

The in vitro cytotoxicity of compounds 15 against human cancer cell lines (HL-60, A549, SMMC-7721, MCF-7, and SW480) was assayed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfopheny)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) method, wherein Taxol was used as the positive control [16,17].
The inhibitory effects of compounds 15 on NO production were evaluated in LPS-activated murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells, using a method modified from what had been previously reported [18]. RAW264.7 was purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Shanghai cell bank, and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) medium and fetal bovine serum were purchased from the Bi Company. Griess reagent, Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and the comparator L-NG-Monomethyl Arginine citrate (L-NMMA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).
The protective effects of compounds 15 on corticosterone-induced apoptosis were evaluated using a previously reported method [19]. Briefly, differentiated PC12 cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and were incubated at 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Poorly differentiated PC12 cells were divided into the following groups: untreated, CORT (150 μmol/L), CORT (150 μmol/L) plus DIM (10 μmol/L) as the positive control, and CORT (150 μmol/L) plus one of the test compounds (20 μmol/L). Poorly differentiated PC12 cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. After a 24 h culture, the wells were added as compounds, as previously described. Next, 48 h later, MTS solution was added to each well. An absorbance was measured at 492 nm using a Thermo Multiskan FC. All data was expressed as mean ± SD and paired t-tests implemented in SPSS 13.0 were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between separate treatment groups and the control.
The above biological activities tests were conducted at the Natural Drug Activity Screening Center, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

4. Conclusions

Phytochemical investigation of the stem bark of P. strobilacea afforded five new cyclic diarylheptanoids (i.e., platycary A−E (compounds 15)) and three known ones: phttyearynol (compound 6), myricatomentogenin (compound 7), and juglanin D (compound 8). Biological activities of compounds 15 were evaluated using cytotoxicity, NO, and corticosterone-induced apoptosis assays. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibited significant protective effects against the corticosterone-induced apoptosis of PC12 cells at the concentration of 20 μΜ, indicating that compounds 1 and 2 are two potential cytoprotective agents for neurological diseases. The identification of these new compounds significantly increases both the number of diarylheptanoids produced by P. strobilacea and the number of diarylheptanoids with potential medical value.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figures S1−S33 associated with the HRESIMS, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and 2D NMR spectra of new compounds.

Author Contributions

G.-h.L. and R.-y.Z. were responsible for the collection of plant materials. H.-l.H. carried out the large-scale fermentation and extraction. J.X. and B.-l.L. isolated the compounds. L.Q. were responsible for biological activities. W.-b.D. carried out the structure elucidation and manuscript preparation. Y.-z.L. designed and supervised this research and the final revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 18A093) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31400308).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zhang Dai-gui (Key laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Jishou University) for plant specimen identification.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cerulli, A.; Masullo, M.; Montoro, P.; Montoro, P.; Hošek, J.; Pizza, C.; Piacente, S. Metabolite profiling of “green” extracts of Corylus avellana leaves by 1H-NMR spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. 2018, 147, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jahng, Y.; Park, J.G. Recent studies on cyclic 1, 7-diarylheptanoids: Their isolation, structures, biological activities, and chemical synthesis. Molecules 2018, 23, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Atkinson, P.J.; Upson, T. Platycarya strobilacea, juglandaceae. Curtis’s Bot. Mag. 2006, 23, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tanaka, T.; Kirihara, S.; Nonaka, G.I.; Nishioka, I. Tannins and related compounds. CXXIV. Five new ellagitannins, Platycaryanins A, B, C, and D, and Platycariin, and a new complex tannin, Strobilanin, from the fruits and bark of Platycarya strobilacea SIEB et ZUCC., and biomimetic synthesis of C-glycosidic ellagitannins from glucopyranose-based ellagitannins. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993, 41, 1708–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lee, H.; Choi, Y.J.; Jin, J.H. Extractives from the bark of Platycarya strobilacea. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 2007, 96, 408–413. [Google Scholar]
  6. Maeda, H.; Kakoki, N.; Ayabe, M.; Koga, Y.; Oribe, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Kouno, I. Ent-eudesmane sesquiterpenoids, galloyl esters of the oak lactone precursor, and a 3-O-methylellagic acid glycoside from the wood of Platycarya strobilacea. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Morikawa, H.; Saito, Y.; Matsuo, Y.; Maeda, H.; Tanaka, T. Eudesmane Sesquiterpenoids from the Wood of Platycarya strobilacea. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tanaka, T.; Jiang, Z.H.; Kouno, I. Distribution of ellagic acid derivatives and a diarylheptanoid in wood of Platycarya strobilacea. Phytochemistry 1998, 47, 851–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morihara, M.; Sakurai, N.; Inoue, T.; Kawai, K.I.; Nagai, M. Two novel diarylheptanoid glucosides from myrica gale var. tomentosa and absolute structure of plane-chiral galeon. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 820–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, J.; Xu, K.P.; Zou, Z.X.; Zou, H.; Long, H.P.; Tan, L.H.; Liu, R.H.; Wang, Y.K.; Xu, P.S.; Tan, G.S. Two new compounds from the green peel of Juglans mandshurica. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 19, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, G.; Xu, M.L.; Choi, H.G.; Lee, S.H.; Jahng, Y.J.; Lee, C.S.; Moon, D.C.; Woo, M.H.; Son, J.K. Four New Diarylheptanoids from the Roots of Juglans mandshurica. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bruhn, T.; Schaumlöffel, A.; Hemberger, Y.; Bringmann, G. Quantifying the comparison of calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism spectra. Chirality 2013, 25, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Buchanan, G.O.; Regentin, R.; Piagentini, M.; Rascher, A.; McDaniel, R.; Galazzo, J.L.; Licari, P.J. Production of 8-demethylgeldanamycin and 4,5-Epoxy-8-demethylgeldanamycin from a Recombinant Strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Seeram, N.P.; Lewis, P.A.; Jacobs, H. 3,4-epoxy-8,9-dihydropiplartine. A new imide from Piper verrucosum. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 436–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.F.; Luo, Z.P. Desipramine antagonized corticosterone-induced apoptosis in cultured PC12 cells. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. 2002, 23, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Guo, Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, C.; Huang, J.; Li, X.N.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Tong, Q.; Zhang, J.; Luo, Z.; et al. Tricyclic polyprenylated acylphloroglucinols from St John’s Wort, Hypericum perforatum. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1493–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malich, G.; Markovic, B.; Winder, C. The sensitivity and specificity of the MTS tetrazolium assay for detecting the in vitro cytotoxicity of 20 chemicals using human cell lines. Toxicology 1997, 124, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheenpracha, S.; Park, E.J.; Rostama, B.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Chang, L.C. Inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells by the norsesterterpene peroxide, Epimuqubilin A. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jiang, B.P.; Liu, Y.M.; Le, L.; Li, Z.Y.; Si, J.Y.; Liu, X.M.; Chang, Q.; Pan, R.L. Cajaninstilbene acid prevents corticosterone-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 34, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structures of compounds 18.
Figure 1. Structures of compounds 18.
Molecules 25 06034 g001
Figure 2. Experimental and calculated electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of compound 1.
Figure 2. Experimental and calculated electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra of compound 1.
Molecules 25 06034 g002
Figure 3. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of compound 2.
Figure 3. Experimental and calculated ECD spectra of compound 2.
Molecules 25 06034 g003
Figure 4. Protective effects of compounds 15 against corticosterone-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. CORT = corticosterone, DIM = desipramine. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between different treatment groups and the model group (CORT). * Represents a p-value of < 0.05, *** represents a p-value of < 0.001.
Figure 4. Protective effects of compounds 15 against corticosterone-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells. CORT = corticosterone, DIM = desipramine. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences between different treatment groups and the model group (CORT). * Represents a p-value of < 0.05, *** represents a p-value of < 0.001.
Molecules 25 06034 g004
Table 1. The 1H-NMR (600 MHz) data of compounds 15, δH in ppm (coupling type, J in Hz).
Table 1. The 1H-NMR (600 MHz) data of compounds 15, δH in ppm (coupling type, J in Hz).
No.1 a2 a3 a4 b5 b
13.07 (dd, 15.1, 2.0)3.18 (d, 15.8)2.87 (m)3.00 (m)3.25 (m)
2.82 (dd, 15.1, 7.6)2.91 (dd, 15.8, 7.6)2.80 (m)2.85 (dd, 16.4, 8.3)2.51 (dd, 16.1, 5.4)
23.98 (dd, 7.6, 2.0)4.06 (dd, 7.7, 1.9)2.35–2.39 (m)2.40 (dd, 17.4, 9.6)2.27 (dd, 17.7, 5.4)
2.33 (dd, 16.8, 7.7)2.46 (m)
42.12 (m)2.36 (m)2.18–2.24 (m)2.22 (m)2.40 (m)
1.64 (m)2.27 (m) 2.09 (m)1.52 (dd, 19.0, 11.5)
51.46–1.56 (m)2.55 (m)2.38 (m)2.52 (m)2.06 (m)
2.14 (m)2.31 (m)2.28 (m)1.71 (m)
61.75 (m)5.99 (dt, 11.2, 7.2)5.97 (dt, 11.5, 7.3)5.97 (dt, 11.2, 7.2)3.26 (m, overlapped)
1.60 (m)
72.75 (m)6.75 (d, 11.2)6.71 (d, 11.5)6.71 (d, 11.2)4.18 (d, 4.3)
2.55 (m)
2′5.72 (d, 2.1)5.57 (br s)5.38 (d, 2.0)5.45 (d, 2.0)5.16 (d, 2.2)
5′6.72 (d, 8.1)6.76 (overlapped)6.73 (d, 8.1)6.82 (d, 8.1)6.84 (d, 8.3)
6′6.57 (dd, 8.1, 2.1)6.59 (dd, 8.2, 2.1)6.57 (dd, 8.1, 2.0)6.73 (dd, 8.1, 2.0)6.63 (dd, 8.3, 2.2)
2″6.82 (d, 2.0)6.87 (d, 1.9)6.83 (d, 1.9)6.90 (d, 2.0)6.97 (d, 1.7)
5″6.83 (d, 8.2)6.96 (d, 8.2)6.92 (d, 8.1)6.99 (d, 8.2)7.06 (overlapped)
6″6.77 (dd, 8.2, 2.0)6.73 (overlapped)6.74 (dd, 8.1, 1.9)6.83 (dd, 8.2, 2.0)7.06 (overlapped)
4′-OCH3 3.91 (s)
3″-OCH3 3.72 (s, 3H)
a Data were measured in CD3OD; b Data were measured in CDCl3.
Table 2. The 13C-NMR (150 MHz) data of compounds 15, δC in ppm.
Table 2. The 13C-NMR (150 MHz) data of compounds 15, δC in ppm.
NO.1 a2 a3 a4 b5 b
138.537.927.726.726.7
277.376.640.839.940.0
3215.5214.3211.4208.5207.3
442.739.042.942.137.9
520.820.420.018.820.9
628.6132.2132.4131.656.2
736.8133.2133.1131.955.9
1′141.2138.4138.5137.3134.4
2′119.6118.4118.4116.5110.8
3′151.5151.7151.7149.2152.5
4′144.1144.1143.3141.3144.0
5′125.3125.5125.5123.8124.0
6′122.8121.7121.6121.3119.6
1″129.4129.5133.8133.8132.4
2″116.6115.7113.5112.9111.6
3″149.4149.3149.4148.7147.5
4″145.6145.2144.6146.4143.0
5″117.0117.2117.2112.1115.3
6″124.9124.6122.9122.5122.4
4′-OCH3 56.1
3″-OCH3 56.2
a Data were measured in CD3OD; b Data were measured in CDCl3.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, W.-b.; Zhao, R.-y.; Li, G.-h.; Liu, B.-l.; He, H.-l.; Qiu, L.; Xue, J.; Li, Y.-z. New Cyclic Diarylheptanoids from Platycarya strobilacea. Molecules 2020, 25, 6034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25246034

AMA Style

Ding W-b, Zhao R-y, Li G-h, Liu B-l, He H-l, Qiu L, Xue J, Li Y-z. New Cyclic Diarylheptanoids from Platycarya strobilacea. Molecules. 2020; 25(24):6034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25246034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Wen-bing, Rui-yuan Zhao, Guan-hua Li, Bing-lei Liu, Hua-liang He, Lin Qiu, Jin Xue, and You-zhi Li. 2020. "New Cyclic Diarylheptanoids from Platycarya strobilacea" Molecules 25, no. 24: 6034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25246034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop