Next Article in Journal
Nanocellulose Hybrids with Metal Oxides Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Microextraction of Lead(II) Traces from Water and Aqueous Extracts before FAAS Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Flame-Retardant Systems Based on Chitosan and Its Derivatives: State of the Art and Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Addition of Amine in Organophosphorus Compounds on Molecular Structuration of Ionic Liquids–Application to Solvent Extraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Reducing the Competition: A Dual-Purpose Ionic Liquid for the Extraction of Gallium from Iron Chloride Solutions

1
EaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, UK
2
School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(18), 4047; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184047
Submission received: 10 August 2020 / Revised: 31 August 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 4 September 2020

Abstract

:
The separation of gallium from iron by solvent extraction from chloride media is challenging because the anionic chloridometalates, FeCl4 and GaCl4, display similar chemical properties. However, we report here that the selective separation of gallium from iron in HCl solution can be achieved using the dual-purpose ionic liquid methyltrioctylammonium iodide in a solvent extraction process. In this case, the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ by the iodide counterion was found to inhibit Fe transport, facilitating quantitative Ga extraction by the ionic liquid with minimal Fe extraction from 2 M HCl.

1. Introduction

Gallium is an important component in materials used in modern electronic devices such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and solar panels and is also exploited in biomedical, pharmaceutical, and radiopharmaceutical applications, owing to the similar chemical properties of Ga3+ and Fe3+ cations [1,2]. There are no abundant natural sources of gallium; instead, it is primarily extracted as a by-product of bauxite and zinc ore processing [3,4]. Due to its limited supply in nature, it is considered a critical element, and so its recovery from alternative sources such as coal fly-ash, mine tailings, or electronic waste is important [3,5,6]. In these cases, however, the presence of iron poses challenging selectivity issues in its separation, for example, by solvent extraction.
Ionic liquids (ILs) are an increasingly established class of extractant that are used either neat or diluted in a hydrophobic solvent to extract various metal ions from aqueous solutions [7,8]. ILs such as trioctylammonium chloride ([TOAH][Cl]) and methyltrioctylammonium chloride ([MTOA][Cl]) have been widely reported as reagents for the recovery of gallium and iron by solvent extraction [9,10,11]. Phase transport is achieved through the formation of charge-neutral supramolecular assemblies such as [MTOA][GaCl4], with GaCl4 formed under high chloride conditions in the aqueous phase. Most industrial solvent extraction processes operate under chloride, sulfate, or nitrate conditions [7]. As such, solvent extraction processes that feature metalate transport largely exploit chloride media to generate chloridometalates, although processes using other aqueous halides as counterions for ILs have been reported [12]. ILs have also been used in the direct recovery of metals from secondary sources by selective metal dissolution [13]. In this case, a trihalide IL provided an oxidizing agent to dissolve the metal and a cation or additional complexing agent. However, current approaches using ILs do not address the challenges in selectivity for Fe and Ga. Under high chloride concentrations, both of these metals exist as the tetrahedral metalates, [FeCl4] and [GaCl4], for which current outer-sphere, cationic receptors do not discriminate [1,2].
Recently, the selective recovery of Ga from iron mine tailings was reported [14]. Leaching of the metals using 8 M HCl generated a mixture of Ga and Fe chlorides which were separated by reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+ using SnCl2. The iron was not extracted easily at this oxidation state, whereas the monoanion [GaCl4] was extracted with tributylphosphate (TBP, 10% in benzene), albeit with 20–30% co-extraction of iron.
In this work, we report a novel combination of the selective reduction of Fe3+ and recovery of Ga3+ by solvent extraction using the dual-purpose IL methyltrioctylammonium iodide ([MTOA][I]). Mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, and UV-Vis spectrophotometry confirm that the iodide functions as a reducing agent for Fe3+ and that the hydrophobic quaternary ammonium group forms a stable ion pair with [GaCl4] in the organic phase, facilitating phase transport and separation in one step.

2. Results and Discussion

The transport of gallium into a toluene solution of the iodide IL [MTOA][I] from a binary equimolar mixture of 0.01 M FeCl3 and GaCl3 in varying concentrations of hydrochloric acid solutions was tested and shows excellent selectivity for gallium between 1 and 4 M HCl (Figure 1). The amount of iron extracted increases markedly as the concentration of HCl increases above 3 M, likely due to a greater proportion of Fe existing as [FeCl4] in solution. In contrast, similar experiments under the same conditions using the chloride IL [MTOA][Cl] show that both iron and gallium are efficiently extracted at concentrations greater than 1 M HCl (Figure 1). Gallium is readily stripped from the organic phase by a fresh aqueous phase of water, whereas <5% is stripped using 2 M HCl.
The nature of the gallium species extracted under these conditions was probed by 71Ga NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2). After contact of a GaCl3 solution in 2 M HCl with either 0.1 M [MTOA][Cl] or [MTOA][I] in toluene, a single resonance is seen at 250 ppm for both organic phases, consistent with the formation of the [GaCl4] anion [15]. In contrast, the 71Ga NMR spectra of aqueous solutions of GaCl3 in 0 to 7 M HCl show a peak at 0.0 ppm assigned to the hexahydrate [Ga(H2O)6][Cl3] [15]. The metalate, [GaCl4], is only observed in aqueous solutions above 8 M HCl, upon which the 71Ga resonance shifts to 250 ppm. As the metalate is not initially present at 2 M HCl, it is likely that formation of the chlorogallate [GaCl4] occurs at the interface between the two phases, which favors the assembly of a stable ion pair with the quaternary ammonium cation in the organic phase.
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was also used to probe the organic phase speciation of extracted Ga and Fe solutions (Supplementary Materials Figures S1 and S2). Organic phases resulting from extractions from 2 M HCl show no evidence of mixed halometalates such as [GaCl3I] or [FeCl3I], and instead the anions [FeCl4] and [GaCl4] are seen in the negative-ion spectrum, while ([MTOA]2[GaCl4])+ is one of the dominant molecular ions in the positive-ion spectrum. The absence of anions such as [GaCl3I] in the negative-ion mass spectrum suggests that [GaCl4] is initially formed in the aqueous phase (or at the interface) prior to transport across to the organic phase, as opposed to the transport of the neutral complex GaCl3 with subsequent metalate formation in the organic phase due to the presence of I ions.
Slope analysis (Log D vs. Log [L]) of the extracted Ga species analyzed for extractant concentrations of 0.001 to 0.25 M at 2 M HCl gives an L:Ga ratio of approximately 1 (Figure 3) and suggests that the simple ion pair [MTOA][GaCl4] is present in the organic phase. In addition, there is no correlation between Ga transport and [H+] concentration from slope analysis (Log D vs. Log [H+]) of varying [H+] concentrations of 0.01 to 1 M at 2 M NaCl (Figure S3), ruling out transport of neutral species such as HGaCl4 and therefore confirming an ion-exchange extraction mechanism between I and [GaCl4].
Evidence for reduction of Fe3+ by I during extractions is apparent, as the color of the organic phase changes from bright yellow to deep red, and the initially yellow aqueous phase turns colorless. The deep red color of the organic phase is consistent with the presence of the triiodide anion, I3, and is supported by the appearance of the absorption at 375 nm in the UV-Vis spectrum of the metal-loaded organic phase (Figure 4a) [16]. The UV-Vis spectrum of the Fe3+ aqueous phase at 2 M HCl prior to contact with [MTOA][I] shows two absorption maxima at 220 and 336 nm which are consistent with the presence of FeCl2+ (Figure 4b) [17,18]. After contact with [MTOA][I], the UV-Vis spectrum of the aqueous phase bleaches and shows only one absorption maximum at 225 nm due to the presence of aqueous Fe2+ (Figure 4b); Fe(II) chloridometalates are unlikely to be present, as high chloride concentrations are needed for their formation, and therefore no extraction of Fe(II) complexes is seen using the anion extractant [MTOA][I] [19,20].

3. Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise stated, all solvents and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Fisher Scientific UK, Alfa Aesar (Heysham, UK), Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium), or VWR International (Lutterworth, UK) and used without further purification. Deionized water was produced using a Milli-Q purification system. 1H and 13C NMR Spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVA500 spectrometer operating at 500.12 and 125.76 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. 71Ga NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker PRO500 spectrometer at 152.55 MHz.

3.1. General Solvent Extraction Procedure

Aqueous solutions of FeCl3 and GaCl3 (0.01 M) in 0–12 M HCl (2 mL) were contacted with a toluene organic phase (2 mL) containing either methyltrioctylammonium iodide or methyltrioctylammonium chloride (0.1 M) and stirred (1 h, 1000 rpm, 25 °C). The phases were then separated physically, and samples were from each taken and diluted with 1-methoxy-2-propanol for ICP-OES analysis. Samples from relevant phases were also taken for UV-VIS, NMR, and ESI-MS analysis as required.

3.2. Synthesis of Methyltrioctylammonium Iodide ([MTOA][I])

Following a standard preparation [21], iodomethane (4.44 g, 31 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of trioctylamine (8.85 g, 25 mmol) in THF (100 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 12 h under a flow of N2. The crude mixture was concentrated under vacuum to yield a viscous orange oil (100%) and diluted with toluene to form a 1.0 M stock solution.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δH 3.41–3.35 (m, 6H, NCH2), 3.24 (s, 3H, NCH3), 1.74–1.64 (m, 6H, CH2), 1.43–1.23 (m, 30H, CH2), 0.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 9H, CH2CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δC 61.70, 48.83, 31.62, 29.10, 29.01, 26.30, 22.57, 22.43, 14.04.

4. Conclusions

It is clear from this work that the quaternary ammonium salt, [MTOA][I], functions as a novel dual-purpose reductant and extractant, efficiently and selectively separating Ga3+ from Fe3+ in a single step between 1–4 M HCl by reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and transport of Ga as its metalate [GaCl4] by anion exchange. This process is operationally simple, featuring low-cost, readily available reagents. Excellent separation of Ga from Fe occurs under low to moderate HCl concentrations and eliminates the need for external reducing agents such as Fe powder or SnCl2. Back extraction (stripping) of gallium from the organic phase occurs readily with water. In principle, the organic phase could be regenerated by contact with aqueous potassium iodide and a mild reducing agent, such as sodium thiosulfate [22].

Supplementary Materials

The following supplementary materials are available online. Figure S1: Negative ion ESI-MS of [MTOA][I] in toluene after contact with FeCl3 and GaCl3 in 2 M HCl. Figure S2: Positive ion ESI-MS of [MTOA][I] in toluene after contact with FeCl3 and GaCl3 in 2 M HCl. Figure S3: Slope analysis for the transport of Ga by [MTOA][I] with varying [H+].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.M.K. and J.B.L.; methodology and investigation, L.M.M.K.; data analysis, L.M.M.K., C.A.M., B.T.N., and J.B.L.; resources, C.A.M., B.T.N., and J.B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.M.K.; writing—review and editing, L.M.M.K., C.A.M., B.T.N., and J.B.L.; supervision, C.A.M., B.T.N., and J.B.L.; project administration, J.B.L.; funding acquisition, C.A.M., B.T.N., and J.B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Edinburgh and the Natural Environment Research Council E3-DTP, grant number NE/L002558/1 (PhD studentship, L.M.M.K.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jamie P. Hunter for providing initial samples of methyltrioctylammonium iodide and his valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict to declare.

References

  1. Wood, S.A.; Samson, I.M. The aqueous geochemistry of gallium, germanium, indium, and scandium. Ore Geol. Rev. 2006, 28, 57–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, W.; Etschmann, B.; Brugger, J.; Spiccia, L.; Foran, G.; McInnes, B. UV–Vis spectrophotometric and XAFS studies of ferric chloride complexes in hyper-saline LiCl solutions at 25–90 °C. Chem. Geol. 2006, 231, 326–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, F.; Xiao, T.; Lin, J.; Ning, Z.; Long, Q.; Xiao, L.; Huang, F.; Wang, W.; Xiao, Q.; Lan, X.; et al. Resources and extraction of gallium: A review. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 174, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, Z.; Cao, H.; Xiao, Y.; Sietsma, J.; Jin, W.; Agterhuis, H.; Yang, Y. Toward Sustainability for Recovery of Critical Metals from Electronic Waste: The Hydrochemistry Processes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. European Commission. Critical Raw Materials Factsheets. 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_en (accessed on 25 May 2020).
  6. Nelson, J.J.M.; Schelter, E.J. Sustainable Inorganic Chemistry: Metal Separations for Recycling. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wilson, A.M.; Bailey, P.J.; Tasker, P.A.; Turkington, J.R.; Grant, R.A.; Love, J.B. Solvent extraction: The coordination chemistry behind extractive metallurgy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hunter, J.P.; Dolezalova, S.; Ngwenya, B.T.; Morrison, C.A.; Love, J.B. Understanding the Recovery of Rare-Earth Elements by Ammonium Salts. Metals 2018, 8, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Katsuta, S.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Okai, M.; Takeda, Y.; Bessho, K. Selective Extraction of Palladium and Platinum from Hydrochloric Acid Solutions by Trioctylammonium-Based Mixed Ionic Liquids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 12735–12740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Los Ríos, A.P.; Hernández-Fernández, F.J.; Lozano, L.J.; Sánchez, S.; Moreno, J.I.; Godínez, C. Removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions by extraction with ionic liquids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nayak, S.; Devi, N. Studies on extraction of gallium(III) from chloride solution using Cyphos IL 104 and its removal from photodiodes and red mud. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 171, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vereycken, W.; Riaño, S.; Van Gerven, T.; Binnemans, K. Extraction Behavior and Separation of Precious and Base Metals from Chloride, Bromide, and Iodide Media Using Undiluted Halide Ionic Liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 8223–8234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van den Bossche, A.; Vereycken, W.; Vander Hoogerstraete, T.; Dehaen, W.; Binnemans, K. Recovery of Gallium, Indium, and Arsenic from Semiconductors Using Tribromide Ionic Liquids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 14451–14459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Macías-Macías, K.Y.; Ceniceros-Gómez, A.E.; Gutiérrez-Ruiz, M.E.; González-Chávez, J.L.; Martínez-Jardines, L.G. Extraction and recovery of the strategic element gallium from an iron mine tailing. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Černy, Z.; Macháček, J.; Fusek, J.; Křiž, O.; Čásensky, B.; Tuck, D.G. 71Ga NMR studies of mixtures of gallium trichloride and trimethylgallium. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 456, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Awtrey, A.D.; Connick, R.E. The Absorption Spectra of I2, I3, I, IO3, S4O6 and S2O3. Heat of the Reaction I3 = I2 + I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 1842–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gamlen, G.A.; Jordan, D.O. A spectrophotometric study of the iron(III) chloro-complexes. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 87, 1435–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Persson, I. Ferric Chloride Complexes in Aqueous Solution: An EXAFS Study. J. Solut. Chem. 2018, 47, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Heinrich, C.A.; Seward, T.M. A spectrophotometric study of aqueous iron (II) chloride complexing from 25 to 200 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 2207–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, R.; Pan, P. A spectrophotometric study of Fe(II)-chloride complexes in aqueous solutions from 10 to 100 °C. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ab Rani, M.A.; Borduas, N.; Colquhoun, V.; Hanley, R.; Johnson, H.; Larger, S.; Lickiss, P.D.; Llopis-Mestre, V.; Luu, S.; Mogstad, M.; et al. The potential of methylsiloxanes as solvents for synthetic chemistry applications. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1282–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Housecroft, C.E. Inorganic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Pearson Education Ltd.: Harlow, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of methyltrioctylammonium iodide [MTOA][I] are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Percentage of gallium and iron extracted by [MTOA][I] at varying [HCl]. Interpolation used to aid the eye only. Experiments were performed in duplicate, and the results are reported as an average.
Figure 1. Percentage of gallium and iron extracted by [MTOA][I] at varying [HCl]. Interpolation used to aid the eye only. Experiments were performed in duplicate, and the results are reported as an average.
Molecules 25 04047 g001
Figure 2. Top: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.1 M [MTOA][I] or [MTOA][Cl] in toluene after contact with 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 2 M HCl. Middle: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 8 M HCl. Bottom: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 2 M HCl.
Figure 2. Top: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.1 M [MTOA][I] or [MTOA][Cl] in toluene after contact with 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 2 M HCl. Middle: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 8 M HCl. Bottom: 71Ga NMR spectrum of 0.01 M GaCl3 dissolved in 2 M HCl.
Molecules 25 04047 g002
Figure 3. Slope analysis for the transport of Ga by [MTOA][I]. Conditions: GaCl3 (0.01 M) in HCl (2.0 M, 2 mL), contacted with [MTOA][I] (0.001 to 0.25 M) in toluene (2 mL) for 1 h at RT with magnetic stirring.
Figure 3. Slope analysis for the transport of Ga by [MTOA][I]. Conditions: GaCl3 (0.01 M) in HCl (2.0 M, 2 mL), contacted with [MTOA][I] (0.001 to 0.25 M) in toluene (2 mL) for 1 h at RT with magnetic stirring.
Molecules 25 04047 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra. (a) Toluene solutions of [MTOA][I] before (black) and after (red) contact with FeCl3. Each solution diluted 500× in toluene. (b) The 2 M HCl solutions of FeCl3 before (black) and after (red) contact with 0.1 M [MTOA][I] in toluene. Each solution diluted 100× in 2 M HCl.
Figure 4. UV-Vis spectra. (a) Toluene solutions of [MTOA][I] before (black) and after (red) contact with FeCl3. Each solution diluted 500× in toluene. (b) The 2 M HCl solutions of FeCl3 before (black) and after (red) contact with 0.1 M [MTOA][I] in toluene. Each solution diluted 100× in 2 M HCl.
Molecules 25 04047 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

M. M. Kinsman, L.; A. Morrison, C.; T. Ngwenya, B.; B. Love, J. Reducing the Competition: A Dual-Purpose Ionic Liquid for the Extraction of Gallium from Iron Chloride Solutions. Molecules 2020, 25, 4047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184047

AMA Style

M. M. Kinsman L, A. Morrison C, T. Ngwenya B, B. Love J. Reducing the Competition: A Dual-Purpose Ionic Liquid for the Extraction of Gallium from Iron Chloride Solutions. Molecules. 2020; 25(18):4047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184047

Chicago/Turabian Style

M. M. Kinsman, Luke, Carole A. Morrison, Bryne T. Ngwenya, and Jason B. Love. 2020. "Reducing the Competition: A Dual-Purpose Ionic Liquid for the Extraction of Gallium from Iron Chloride Solutions" Molecules 25, no. 18: 4047. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop