Next Article in Journal
Phytosynthesis of Palladium Nanoclusters: An Efficient Nanozyme for Ultrasensitive and Selective Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Natural Bioactive Compounds from Natural Plant Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperpolarization of Nitrile Compounds Using Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Biocompatible Polysaccharide-Based Eutectogels with Tunable Rheological, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties: The Role of Water
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2

Institute of Chemical Technology and Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Berdychowo 4, 60-695 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(15), 3348; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153348
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 17 July 2020 / Accepted: 20 July 2020 / Published: 23 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue BioOrg: From Biomolecules to Biomaterials)

Abstract

Azole antifungal molecules are broadly used as active ingredients in various products, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides. This promotes their release into the natural environment. The detailed mechanism of their influence on the biotic components of natural ecosystems remains unexplored. Our research aimed to examine the response of Ochrobactrum anthropi AspCl2.2 to the presence of four azole antifungal agents (clotrimazole, fluconazole, climbazole, epoxiconazole). The experiments performed include analysis of the cell metabolic activity, cell membrane permeability, total glutathione level and activity of glutathione S-transferases. These studies allowed for the evaluation of the cells’ oxidative stress response to the presence of azole antifungals. Moreover, changes in the nanomechanical surface properties, including adhesive and elastic features of the cells, were investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and spectrophotometric methods. The results indicate that the azoles promote bacterial oxidative stress. The strongest differences were noted for the cells cultivated with fluconazole. The least toxic effect has been attributed to climbazole. AFM observations unraveled molecular details of bacterial cell texture, structure and surface nanomechanical properties. Antifungals promote the nanoscale modification of the bacterial cell wall. The results presented provided a significant insight into the strategies used by environmental bacterial cells to survive exposures to toxic azole antifungal agents.
Keywords: xenobiotics; pharmaceuticals; oxidative stress; environment; hydrophobicity; permeability; roughness xenobiotics; pharmaceuticals; oxidative stress; environment; hydrophobicity; permeability; roughness

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pacholak, A.; Burlaga, N.; Kaczorek, E. Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2. Molecules 2020, 25, 3348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153348

AMA Style

Pacholak A, Burlaga N, Kaczorek E. Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2. Molecules. 2020; 25(15):3348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pacholak, Amanda, Natalia Burlaga, and Ewa Kaczorek. 2020. "Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2" Molecules 25, no. 15: 3348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153348

APA Style

Pacholak, A., Burlaga, N., & Kaczorek, E. (2020). Evaluating the Effect of Azole Antifungal Agents on the Stress Response and Nanomechanical Surface Properties of Ochrobactrum anthropi Aspcl2.2. Molecules, 25(15), 3348. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153348

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop