Next Article in Journal
LC–MS-Based Lipidomic Analysis of Serum Samples from Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Treated with an Extract of Acanthopanax sessiliflorus Fruits
Next Article in Special Issue
Importance of Fluorine in Benzazole Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Huperzine A and Huperzine B Production by Prothallus Cultures of Huperzia selago (L.) Bernh. ex Schrank et Mart
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Fluorinated 3,6-Dihydropyridines and 2-(Fluoromethyl)pyridines by Electrophilic Fluorination of 1,2-Dihydropyridines with Selectfluor®
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules25143264
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Asymmetric Preparation of α-Quaternary Fluorinated β-keto Esters. Review

by
Albert Granados
* and
Adelina Vallribera
*
Department of Chemistry and Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Carrer dels Til.lers, UAB Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(14), 3264; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143264
Submission received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 10 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published: 17 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorine Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this review, recent advances over the past decade in the preparation of fluorinated stereogenic quaternary centers on β-keto esters compounds are analyzed. Since the incorporation of fluorine and fluorinated groups is of special interest in pharmaceutical chemistry, a range of metal-catalyzed and organocatalyzed methods have been developed. Herein, we review the enantioselective fluorination, trifluoromethylation and trifluoromethylthiolation of 3-oxo esters. The scope, the induction of enantioselectivity and mechanistic investigations are presented.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The field of organofluorine chemistry has been of increasing interest to academia and industry during recent decades [1,2,3]. Fluorine now occupies a prestigious position, especially in the design of biologically active compounds, and indeed, nearly 30% of human medicines and 35% of agrochemicals on the market contain one or more fluorine atoms [4,5,6]. The incorporation of fluorine atoms into the drug discovery process has emerged as a common strategy [7]. The physicochemical effects imparted by fluorine explain its utility and impact in a wide range of drugs, including antidepressant, antipsychotic, antitumor, antiviral, anaesthetic, anti-inflammatory agents, etc. [8,9,10]. The inclusion of a fluorine atom in a drug molecule can have a profound effect on the molecule’s pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, distribution and extent of drug metabolism [11,12]. For example, the addition of functional groups to therapeutic molecules can greatly enhance the lipophilicity of the drug, which in turn can enhance bioavailability, tissue distribution and cell permeability. Also, it can affect the interaction of the drug with the pharmacological target for example, through effects on the inter and intramolecular forces present in the binding [13,14].
In addition, the use of radioactive 18F nucleus in positron emission topography (PET) labelling broadened the applicability in medicine, serving as a privileged diagnostic tool for cancer and other diseases [15]. The use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and other [18F]labelled radiotracers in oncology, brain diseases and cardiology has established the value of 18F as a positron emitter for PET and encouraged new developments for late stage fluorination. Furthermore, to enable early monitoring of various diseases with non-invasive diagnostic tools 19F magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been exploited with great success. Applications can be found in targeted imaging of selected relevant physiological techniques, in targeted drug delivery and cell tracking. 19F MRI agents have been classified in molecular tracers, polymers and branched derivatives [16].
Fluorinated materials have found applications in materials sciences and their importance in modern industry and technology is expected to grow even more in the near future [17]. Fluorinated materials have been widely used in liquid crystals [18,19], smartphone displays, photovoltaic solar cells, surface modification chemistry [20], stabilization of metal nanoparticles [21,22] and crystal/metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) engineering. Introduction of fluorous tags onto materials can favour ordering, self-organization, hydrophobicity [23] and chemical stability. Fluorinated polymers exhibit outstanding chemical resistance, thermal stability, low friction coefficients and electrical properties [24]. In particular some fluorinated polymers have been intensively investigated and applied due to their electroactive properties in biomedical applications including controlled drug delivery systems and tissue engineering.
Thus, due to its importance, the development of new methodologies that give access to fluorinated compounds is in demand [25,26,27]. In particular, the stereoselective introduction of fluorine or fluoroalkylated groups to generate stereogenic centres has been of growing interest. Specifically, as we will see throughout this manuscript, the selective fluorination at specified positions of an organic compound forming C-F, C-CF3 and C-SCF3 bonds from C-H is especially important and a challenging task.
There are plenty of papers published in the past two decades in reference to the asymmetric introduction of these groups into organic molecules and therefore is impossible to include all of them. However, there are excellent reviews that should not be omitted [28,29,30,31]. Since 2000, a practical enantioselective methodology leading to construction of a C−F quaternary stereocenter has been developed using chiral N−F reagents derived from N-fluoroammonium salts by the combination of cinchona alkaloids and Selectfluor®. A great diversity of silyl enol ethers, allylsilanes, 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, oxindoles, dipeptide, and enolates can be used as substrates. Other methods include primary and secondary amine catalysts via enamine intermediates, cationic and anionic phase-transfer catalyst, etc. [28]. At the same time, in 2010 an important breakthrough in this chemistry related to a metal catalytic protocol was the pioneering research by using Ti/TADDOL catalyst with Selectfluor® [28,32]. These protocols are based on electrophilic fluorinating processes. The comprehensive discussion of the catalytic asymmetric scenario for C-F formation, including organocatalytic methods and transition-metal catalyzed transformations, has been previously reviewed [28,29,30]. Moreover, the development of approaches for the straightforward asymmetric introduction of trifluoromethyl groups into small molecules, including nucleophilic, electrophilic, or free radical processes, has received much recent attention [29,30]. In contrast to their nucleophilic counterparts (generally based on the use of Ruppert–Prakash reagent TMSCF3), enantioselective and radical electrophilic trifluoromethylation reactions remain far less developed. In particular, MacMillan and co-workers described a conceptually novel approach to the asymmetric α-trifluoromethylation of aldehydes via the merger of enamine catalysis, CF3I and photoredox catalysis [33]. Allen and MacMillan also reported in 2010 the highly asymmetric α-trifluoromethylation of aldehydes using Togni’s reagent utilizing both enamine organocatalysis and transition metal catalysis [34]. For a historical background on the most important useful methods for trifluoromethylthiolation please see an excellent review of Billard [31]. While this group has been utilized for some time, it is only very recently that methods for its direct asymmetric introduction have come into the mainstream and will be revised herein.
In this review, evolution and advances over the last ten years in the preparation of fluorinated quiral quaternary centres on β-keto esters compounds are analysed. Simple β-keto esters have been selected and studied by many groups and are well established as substrates in synthesis. Possessing an active methylene and two functional groups make them really versatile molecules in organic synthesis [35,36,37]. They are useful synthetic precursors, as for example the ketone is easily converted to other functional groups (i.e., alcohols and imines) and the ester can be transformed to different amides through the carboxylic acid. The utility of the enantioselective fluorinated β-keto esters has been highlighted by highly diastereoselective transformations of the trifluoromethylated products carried out by Gade’s group [38]. The scope, the induction of enantioselectivity and mechanistic investigations of Cα-F, Cα-CF3 and Cα-SCF3 bonds formation in β-keto esters are presented.

2. Asymmetric Preparation of Quaternary C-F Stereocentres on β-keto Esters

At first glance, to fluorinate the α-intercarbonylic position of a β-keto ester an electrophilic reagent will be necessary. The development of stable sources of electrophilic fluorinating agents (Figure 1), such as N-fluorobenzensulfonimide [39] (NFSI) and Selectfluor® [40] has had a great impact and witnessed encouraging progress on the catalytic enantioselective electrophilic fluorination. On the contrary, an enantioselective nucleophilic fluorination of β-keto esters will be an umpolung reaction and is still in its beginnings because of the low reactivity of the fluoride anion. Recently nucleophilic fluoride sources as Et3N·3HF and Et3N·5HF have been used for the enantioselective oxidative fluorination of β-keto esters [41,42].

2.1. Metal-Catalyzed Methods

An important breakthrough in this chemistry occurred when Togni and Hintermann described the catalytic α-fluorination reactions of α-substituted acyclic β-keto esters using a Ti/TADDOL complexes (1, Figure 2) and Selectfluor® (Figure 1), yielding the fluorinated compounds in 62–90% ee [32].
Although there was only one substrate which gave an excellent 90% ee, they demonstrated that chiral metal complexes could promote the stereoselective fluorination. Ti/TADDOL complexes acted as Lewis acid activating the β-keto ester. From this report until 2010 a range of metal catalysed fluorination reactions have been developed and previously reviewed [43]. Some years later, in 2012, Togni’s group in a remarkable paper mainly dedicated to acyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, reported that using the same Ti/TADDOL complex the cyclic tetralone 16 (Scheme 1), gave the α-fluorinated product in 20% ee (entry 20, Table 1) [44]. We will comment on these results on acyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl later on.
In addition to titanium, copper complexes have been also used as Lewis acids. The group of Kesavan studied the combination of Cu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2, Figure 2) with NFSI as a fluorinating reagent, achieving a 34% ee in the α-fluorination of ethyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylate 13 Upon enlarging the ring size to the cyclohexanone derivative (compound 16) the ee decreased to 16% (entries 11 and 21, Table 1). On the contrary, some alkyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylates 17–19 (Scheme 1) gave higher enantioselective values (72–86% ee) [45]. A notable advantage is that ester bulkiness is not needed to achieve high ee. Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) was used as additive to increase the enantioselectivities, promoting the release of the fluorinated product from the catalyst as others have reported before [46].
If we keep talking about copper, asymmetric fluorination of methyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylate (12) catalyzed by the Cu(II)/Ar-BINMOL-derived salan system (Ar-BINMOL = 1,1′-binaphthalene-2-α-arylmethanol-2′-ol) (3, Figure 2) gave 82% ee and 99% yield (entry 10, Table 1) [47]. Only β-keto ester 12 (Scheme 1) was tested, however, these conditions were applied with great success to a series of β-keto amides. In addition to this work, efficient enantioselective fluorination of β-keto esters and amides, catalysed by Cu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) complexes (4, Figure 2), was achieved [48]. These conditions work nicely with five (11, 13, Scheme 1) and six membered rings (15, 16, Scheme 1) and with different esters (entries 5, 15, 18 and 22, Table 1). Unfortunately, racemic product (46% yield) was obtained with 19 as substrate, and compound 20 did not react under these conditions (entries 29 and 32, Table 1). In 2017, Xu and collaborators reported a fast and highly enantioselective fluorination method for different alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates catalysed by a chiral non-commercial diphenylamine Box and Cu(OTf)2 (5, Figure 2) [49]. The reactions were conducted using a ball mill apparatus (Fritsch Planetary Micro Mill model “Pulverisette 7”) in the absence of solvent, yielding the fluorinated compounds with enantioselectivities up to 99% ee (15 examples, 74–99% ee). Ester functionalities with different steric hindrance were well tolerated (entries 3, 8 and 17, Table 1). Halogen substitutions on the aromatic ring gave excellent induction, whereas electron-donating substituents dropped the ee (21 and 22, Figure 3). With a six-member ring substrate (compound 15) the ee dropped to 56% (entry 17 of Table 1). In addition, compounds 19 and 20 (Scheme 1) gave excellent results in terms of reactivity and ee under these conditions (entries 30 and 33, Table 1).
Chiral Fe(III)-salan complexes (6, Figure 2) with AgClO4 (2 mol.%) as additives and NFSI, catalysed the reaction of t-butyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates with different substituents in the aromatic ring (11 examples, 94–97% ee). The bulkiness of the ester group played an important role, as less hindered esters gave lower ee (46–79% ee) (compare entries 1, 6 and 12, Table 1). The influence of different substituents in the aromatic position does not have much influence on the ee (23 and 24, Figure 3). With six membered ring substrate (14) the ee dropped to 69% (entry 16, Table 1). Remarkably, acyclic t-butyl keto esters gave excellent ee (87–94%), as did t-butyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylate, 17 (95% ee, entry 24, Table 1). Addition of silver salt accelerated the reaction [50].
In 2015, Pd μ-hydroxo dimeric complexes containing (R)-DTBM-SEGPHOS (Ar = 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeOC8H2) (7, Figure 2) with NFSI in iPrOH gave 90% ee in the fluorination of t-butyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylate (17) as substrate (only one example, entry 25, Table 1). The method was extensively applied to β-keto amides [51]. In the same year chiral mono-oxazoline ligands ((S)-diphenyl(6-(4-phenyl-4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)pyridine-2-yl)methanol) and Ni(ClO4)2·6H2O (8, Figure 2) in DCM using NFSI, catalysed the reaction of different alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (10 examples, 71–78% ee). Different methyl and halogens substituents on the aromatic ring were tested, showing low influence on the results. Curiously enough the t-butyl ester 11 (Scheme 1) gave a racemic fluorination reaction (entry 2 of Table 1), as did methyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylate (18, entry 26 of Table 1). Moreover, ethyl 1-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtalene-2-carboxylate (15) gave a low 13% ee (entry 19 of Table 1) [52].
Table
Table 1. Conditions and results for enantioselective fluorination reactions of compounds of Scheme 1 (from 2010 to 2020).
Table 1. Conditions and results for enantioselective fluorination reactions of compounds of Scheme 1 (from 2010 to 2020).
EntrySubstrateFluorinating ReagentPre-Catalyst
(see Figure 2)		Yield (%)ee (%)Ref
111NFSIFe(III)/salan (6)
0 °C, MeCN, AgClO4 (2 mol.%)		9694[50]
211NFSINi(II)-monooxazoline (8)890[52]
311NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline) (5), Ball mill9995[49]
411NFSIEu(III)/(R,S)-ind-pybox (9)7896 (S)[53]
511NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rt9399 (S)[48]
612NFSIFe(III)/salan (6)0 °C, MeCN, AgClO4 (2 mol.%)9946[50]
712NFSINi(II)-monooxazoline (8)9075[52]
812NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline), (5), Ball mill9792[49]
912NFSILa(III)/(R,S)-ind-pybox (9)8062 (S)[53]
1012NFSICu/Ar-BINMOL-derived salan (3)
Xylene, 0 °C		9982 (S)[47]
1113NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9834[45]
1213NFSIFe(III)/salan (6)
0 °C, MeCN, AgClO4 (2 mol.%)		9959[50]
1313NFSINi(II)-monooxazoline (8)8577[52]
1413NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline)
(5), Ball mill		9991[49]
1513NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rt10099[48]
1614NFSIFe(III)/salan (6)
0 °C, MeCN, AgClO4 (2 mol.%)		9669[50]
1715NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline)
(5), Ball mill		9356[49]
1815NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rt10093[48]
1915NFSINi(II)-monooxazoline (8)8613[52]
2016Selectfluor®Ti/TADDOL (1), rt, MeCN9320[44]
2116NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9016[45]
2216NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rt9993[48]
2317NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9783[45]
2417NFSIFe(III)/salan (6)
O °C, MeCN, AgClO4 (2 mol.%)		8895[50]
2517NFSIPd(II)/(R)-DTBM-SEGPHOS (7)
iPrOH, rt		9390[51]
2618NFSINi(II)-monooxazoline (8)300[52]
2718NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9672[45]
2819NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9386[45]
2919NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rt460[48]
3019NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline)
(8), Ball mill		9692[49]
3120NFSICu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2)
0 °C, toluene, HFIP		9052[45]
3220NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4), CHCl3, rtn. r.-[48]
3320NFSICu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline)
(5), Ball mill		9599[49]
Based on our previous experience [35,36,37], we have established a catalytic method for the highly enantioselective α-fluorination of a series of t-butyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates, using europium (III) triflate and (S,R)-ind-pybox as pre-catalyst (9, Figure 2), and NFSI as electrophilic fluorinating agent in acetonitrile at −30 °C (6 examples, 81–96% ee). Results revealed a dependence of the enantiocontrol on the steric hindrance of the ester groups in substrates. In general, comparing substituent’s with similar steric hindrance, the presence of electron withdrawing groups in the benzene harmed the ee (23 and 25, Figure 3). Access to both enantiomers of the α-fluorinated oxo ester is guaranteed by the commercial availability of both (R,S) and (S,R) ind-pybox C2-symmetric ligands [53].
Very recently, Gade’s group reported a remarkable contribution using Boxmi ligands in combination with Ni(II) and Zinc (II) complexes (10, Figure 2) with NFSI reagent. They screened four t-butyl indanone-2-carboxylates substituted in the aromatic ring with Ni(II)/Boxmi obtaining excellent ee values (89–94% ee). Methyl ester gave worse results (64% ee). Electron-rich substituents, such as the methoxy group in the aromatic ring of 1-indanone-2-carboxylate, caused slight increased the ee (Figure 3). Three new examples with other substituents in the aromatic ring were tested with Zn(II)/Boxmi and t-butyl ester giving also high levels of induction (84–92%) [54].
All these different reported methodologies are summarized in Table 1. Indanone 11 possessing a t-butyl ester nicely reacted (78–99 yield and 94–99 ee) under four different pre-catalysts combination (entries 1,3-5). Lower inductions are obtained with less bulky methyl and ethyl esters (compounds 12 and 13, Scheme 1). The best general conditions are the ones described by Xu and collaborators which consist in using the Cu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline) combination in a ball mill apparatus [49]. We also recommend the Cu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) combination [48]. Generally, alkyl 1-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtalene-2-carboxylates 14–16 gave lower ee than their indanyl analogues 11–13 (Scheme 1) (compare entries 1 and 16, and entries 8 and 17, Table 1), except in the case of Cu(II)/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) combination [48]. Alkyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylates 17 and 18 normally gave the fluorinated products in lower ee. However, with Fe(III)/salan an excellent 95% ee was reported for substrate 17 having a t-butyl ester [50]. From Table 1 the combination of Cu(II)/diphenylamine-bis(oxazoline) in a ball mill system is recommended for 19 and 20 (Scheme 1), affording 92 and 99% ee, respectively. In general, for all the methodologies (Figure 3) electron-rich substituents such as the methoxy group in the aromatic ring of 1-indanone-2-carboxylate caused increases in ee.
Acyclic β-keto esters are difficult substrates in this reaction even in terms of reactivity. Regarding the enantioinduction they are not so rigid and have more degrees of conformational freedom in comparison with cyclic 3-oxo esters. In 2012, Togni’s group reported [44] that using the Ti/TADDOL complexes (1, Figure 2) and Selectfluor® (Figure 1) a series of alkyl α-methyl 3-oxobutanoates were fluorinated giving excellent yields (44–96%) and moderate ee (10 examples, 45–81% ee). In addition, alkyl α-methyl 3-oxopentanoates could be fluorinated with moderate to high selectivities (7 examples, 30–90% ee). Alkyl 2-methyl 2-benzoylpropanoate compounds were also examined, giving good results (12 examples, 55–82% ee). Best results were obtained with bulky ester groups (29–31, Figure 4). Fluorination of ethyl ester 33 gave a moderate 62% ee (Figure 5). The scope of this method is the most extensive reported until now.
Kesavan’s group reported that ethyl 2-methyl-3-oxobutanoate (32, Figure 5) underwent fluorination in 84% yield and 70% ee (only one example) using the Cu(II)/(S,S)-Nap-(R,R)-Box (2, Figure 2) combination [45]. Du et al. using Cu/diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) (4, Figure 2) evaluated the fluorination of some acyclic α-alkyl β-keto esters, such as ethyl 2-methyl-3-oxo-3-phenylpropanoate (33) and ethyl and t-butyl 2-benzyl-3-oxobutanoates 35, 36. Unfortunately, no fluorinated products were obtained [48]. In addition, Xu’s group reported that using Cu/diphenylamine-linked bis (oxazoline) (5, Figure 2) in a ball mill system [49] fluorination of ethyl 2-benzyl-3-oxobutanoate 35 afforded a moderate yield (60%) and ee (61%); compound 33 also produced the fluorinated compound in 56% yield and 75% ee (Figure 5). Using the Fe(III)-salan combination [50] (6, Figure 2), compound 34 reacted nicely, giving 87% yield and 94% ee. β-Keto ester 36 gave 96% yield and 87% ee of the fluorinated derivative (Figure 5). Low yield (41%) and ee (25%) was obtained using 33 and the Ni(II)-monooxazoline ligand [52].
The reactions described above may all proceed through a similar catalytic cycle regardless of the metal complex used. First, coordination to the metal centre increases the acidity of the α-proton, allowing the metal enolate to be easily generated. The chiral ligand normally acts as a base. Subsequent reaction affords the formation of a stereogenic C-F bond through a SN2 mechanism. The enantioselectivity of the reaction stems from the efficient blockage of one of the faces. See as an example the catalytic cycle proposed for the asymmetric fluorination using europium (III) triflate and (S,R)-ind-pybox combination [53] (Scheme 2).

2.2. Organocatalytic Methods

Phase-transfer catalysis (PTC) has been applied to the enantioselective fluorination of β-keto esters. The first example was reported by Kim and Park in 2002 using quaternary ammonium salts from cinchonine (10% mol, Figure 5), NFSI and K2CO3 [55]. Some years later chiral bifunctional phase transfer catalysts using binaphtyl derivatives 37 (2% mol, Figure 6) were used by Maruoka and collaborators in the fluorination of different t-butyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates affording the products in excellent yields and ee (4 examples 94–98% ee) using NFSI and K2CO3 [56]. Substrates 14 and 17 gave 90 and 98% ee, respectively. Only bulky t-butyl esters were reported [56].
In addition, a designing study of fluorinated cinchone alkaloids was carried out by the group of Gilmour [57]. Using optimized PTC 38 (10% mol, Figure 6), t-butyl and adamantyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates gave moderate ee (78 and 78% ee respectively) with NFSI and Cs2CO3. Some studies on the use of multifunctional catalyst 41 (Figure 6) combining cinchona alkaloid-derived primary amines (10% mol) with l-leucine (20% mol) gave good reactivity using Selecfluor®, although low ee in the fluorination of several alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (four examples, 39–55% ee) [58].
In 2012, bifunctional chiral thioureas 39 (10% mol, Figure 6) with NFSI, DMAP as a base at −60 °C were used as organocatalysts in the enantioselective fluorination of different alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (11 examples, up to 99% ee) [59]. Methyl, ethyl, isopropyl and benzyl ethers gave excellent results, whereas surprisingly t-butyl afforded racemic fluorination. Some alkyl 2-oxocyclo-pentane-1-carboxylates were assayed with success. Benzyl 1-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtalene-2-carboxylate and several acyclic β-keto esters gave low ee, except in the case of compound 35 that afforded a nice 81% ee. A possible reactive intermediate has been proposed by the authors that illustrates this kind of organocatalysis using thioureas (Figure 7). The authors envisioned that the thiourea group was attached to NFSI via hydrogen bonds; and the β-keto ester was coordinated with the tertiary amine through a hydrogen bond of its enol form [59]. In addition, the Waser group used urea-containing chiral ammonium salts 40 (2% mol, Figure 6) with NFSI and K3PO4 as a base at −10 °C affording the fluorination of a small series of alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (11 examples, 70–86% ee). β-Keto esters 14 and 17 gave 74 and 78% ee, respectively) [60].
Akiyama reported in 2014 [61] an interesting work based on the in situ generation of a chiral sodium phosphate derived from a chiral phosphoric acid [42, Figure 6]. Two active species (sodium enolate and sodium phosphate) were generated under Na2CO3 basic conditions. The corresponding α-fluoro β-keto esters including methyl, ethyl and benzyl esters were obtained in excellent yields with good to excellent ee. With Akiyama’s group conditions, the enantioselective fluorination of indanones 12 and 13 was afforded in a 99% and 87% ee, respectively. For the t-butyl ester only a 20% ee was achieved. The method is not useful for tetralone 16.
In 2018, Zheng’s group developed a highly enantioselective oxidative method for the fluorination of β-keto esters using Et3N·3HF as a nucleophilic fluoride source mediated by a chiral iodo arene organocatalyst 43 and mCPBA as oxidant. The yields were low in all the studied cases [41]. Some months after Rueping et al. reported a similar strategy using chiral iodoarene 44 obtaining higher yields and enantioselectivities [42] (Scheme 3). A plausible mechanism (Scheme 3) is the in situ formation of Ar*-I-F2 by oxidation of the hypervalent iodine reactive with HF and the m-CPBA followed by the coordination with β-keto ester (INT1). Then, the next step involves the reaction of the enol form of substrate with [Ar-I-F]+/[HF2]− to abstract the H atom with formation of an O-bonded hypervalent iodine. This underwent a 1,3-migration to afford intermediate INT3 and posterior reductive elimination.

3. Asymmetric Preparation of Quaternary C-CF3 Stereocentres on β-keto Esters

Nowadays the importance of the trifluoromethyl group is well known and appreciated. In pharmaceutical research, molecules bearing the CF3 group are of high interest because it generally encourages remarkable and unusual changes in the properties of the original drug (better metabolic stability, enhanced biodisponibility and modulated lipophilicity) [1]. Since Lehmann reported in 1928 the first biologically active trifluoromethylated molecule [62], the trifluoromethyl group has gained more and more prominence.
α-Trifluoromethyl β-keto esters are intriguing target molecules due to the presence of a chiral quaternary centre and the derivatizable carbonyl group. Thus, its enantiopure asymmetric preparation has been a thrilling challenge for the scientific community.
In the 80s [63] the first electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents developed by Yagupol’skii appeared and later on in the 90s [64], Umemoto presented the second generation based on (trifluoromethyl)dibenzoheterocycle salts, being the S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzthiophenium tetrafluoroborate, 44, (Umemoto’s reagent, Scheme 4) the best known, but it was not until 2003 that Cahard and co-workers [65] applied these reagents in the preparation of non-asymmetric α-trifluoro-methyl β-keto esters.

3.1. Metal-Catalyzed Methods

Gade and co-workers [38] described in 2012 the enantioselective copper-catalysed trifluoromethylation of β-keto esters using commercially available trifluoromethylating reagents. The trifluoromethylation of 1-indanone derivatives proceeded best under Cu(OTf)2 catalysis in presence of bisoxazoline boxmi as a stereo-directing ligand and with the Togni hypervalent iodine reagent 46 (Scheme 4). The method tolerated a great range alkyl 1-indanones-2-carboxylates, either with electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups in aromatic position, providing excellent enantioselectivities and yields. Primary esters also yielded the corresponding trifluoromethylated products with excellent enantioselectivities (up to 96% ee). The method was applied with success to t-butyl 2-oxocyclopentene-1-carboxylates and benzyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylates. Despite the fact Togni’s reagent 46 was the best choice in the five-membered ring substrates, in order to achieve high enantiocontrol in the more enolizable six-membered ring β-keto esters, Umemoto’s reagent 45 was selected in presence of the non-nucleophilic base iPr2NEt (Scheme 4). Unfortunately, acyclic β-keto esters were found to be unreactive under these reaction conditions.
Later, in 2019 Cossío and Vallribera [66] reported a highly enantioselective catalytic method for the synthesis of quaternary α-trifluoromethyl derivatives cyclic β-keto esters under lanthanide catalysis. The methodology implemented by these authors required the use of the Togni reagent 46 and the combination of La(OTf)3 and Nishiyama-type indanyl-pybox ligand, which are commercially available reagents. With the optimized pre-catalyst combination and reaction conditions in hand, a broad range of β-keto esters were examined. Best results were obtained with methyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates, which was remarkable since it showed that this method could be applied to simple β-keto esters. In the presence of either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups excellent enantioselectivities were obtained. Finally, the more enolizable six-membered rings substrates such as alkyl 1-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtalene-2-carboxylates and alkyl 2-oxocyclopentanone carboxylates gave lower ee. The mechanism was explored both by experimental and computational techniques. ESI-MS experiments and NMR studies determined the formation of INT1 (Scheme 5) and the coordination of Togni’s reagent to the lanthanum. Reactions in presence of scavengers determined that the presence of trifluoromethyl radicals in the alkylation process could not be discarded. Afterwards, computational studies at the B3LYP-D3/6-31G*&LanL2DZ level of theory were carried out, and the coordination pattern of the cationic intermediate INT2 in Scheme 5 revealed an efficient blockage of the prochiral Si face of the LaIII enolate. The hindrance of the Si face of the substrate resulted in an efficient SN2-like saddle point TS, which consisted of a Re attack of the Cα atom of the enolate moiety on the CF3 group of the Togni reagent, forming INT3. Unfortunately, this catalytic method could not be applied to open-chain β-keto esters successfully.

3.2. Organocatalytic Methods

In 2007, Cahard’s group reported the very first asymmetric preparation of α-trifluoromethylated cyclic β-keto esters under an organocatalyzed based methodology (Scheme 6) which required the use of S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzthiophenium tetrafluoroborate 45 as electrophilic reagent and a cinchona alkaloid based chiral phase-transfer catalysts (PTC) [67]. They noticed that using a quaternary ammonium PTC and potassium carbonate, the ee were not higher than 20%. The formation of potassium β-keto ester enolate was responsible of the low ee. Thus, to banish the presence of achiral enolates the use of the tertiary PTC hydroquinine was the solution giving the expected α-trifluoromethylated β-keto ester in 53% yield with 71% ee.
A few years later, Shibata [68] deeply investigated the use of chiral guanidines with S-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothiophenium tetrafluoroborate 45. These guanidines act as Brønsted bases to generate chiral guanidinium enolates of β-keto esters, which attack the electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent in a stereospecific manner. The optimization of the reaction included solvents, temperature, electrophilic CF3 source and six different guanidines (Scheme 7). Mixtures of chlorinated solvents were the best option to achieve high enantioselectivities and yields at very low temperature. The electrophilic power of Umemoto’s reagents strongly influenced the reaction. Thus, the selenophenium analogous was not appropriate and even the dinitro derivative of Umemoto’s reagent gave lower results. Finally, the most sterically encumbered guanidines did not provide higher ee, and the suppression of one H-bonding from the imidazolidine ring system dramatically affects the ee, yielding a racemic compound. Thus, this supports the transition state structure where the guanidinium enolates of β-keto esters coordinates the substrate through H-bonding for an excellent stereochemical CF3 transfer (Scheme 7).
The scope of the reaction was investigated. The use of bulkier 1-indanone derivatives did not secure better enantioselectivities; the primary methyl ester provided the best results (63% yield and 70% ee). The presence of substituent’s in the aromatic ring with different electronic natures were also tolerated. The 1-tetralone series and benzyl cyclopentanone-2-carboxylate were in the same range of ee values but lower yield (Scheme 7).
In 2015, Melchiorre’s research group [69] developed an interesting enantioselective perfluoroalkylation and trifluoromethylation of alkyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (Scheme 8) combining both visible-light and phase-transfer-catalysts (PTC). The methodology was based on the in situ formation of the photochemical active electron donor–acceptor (EDA) complexes from chiral ammonium enolates and perfluoroalkyl iodides. The catalyst optimization revealed that stereocontrol was sensitive to structural modifications at the 2′ position of the quinoline ring, being the organocatalyst PTC+Br− (Scheme 8) the one which provided the best results in terms of ee. The synthetic application of this method was tested, assaying different substituted indanone-derived β-keto esters with methyl iodide. Notably, trifluoromethyl-containing quaternary stereocentres could be easily prepared reacting β-keto esters with methyl iodide under the same conditions, achieving ee up to 96%.
Based on some diagnostic mechanistic experiments, a radical chain propagation pathway was proposed. The trifluorometil radical could be generated upon irradiation of the chiral EDA complex. Then, the electrophilic CF3• reacted with the chiral enolate of the β-keto ester (II in the scheme below) giving place to the C-C bond formation through a stereo-controlled manner. The resulting species (III, in Scheme 8, vide infra) abstracted an iodine atom form the perfluorinated iodine compound, giving a new CF3• and the α-trifluoromethyl β-keto ester final product after the elimination of the iodide anion. Years later, Li and collaborators [70] found that EDA complex were responsible for the visible light absorption and the PTC catalyst interacted by electrostatic interactions with the β-keto ester enolate by DFT calculations.

4. Asymmetric Preparation of Quaternary C-SCF3 Stereocentres on β-keto Esters

In recent years, considerable attention has been focused on the trifluoromethylthio group (-SCF3) due to its unique properties of remarkable electron-withdrawing behaviour, excellent metabolic stability and high lipophilicity [71]. In fact, all these properties allow the trifluoromethylthiolated therapeutic molecules across lipidic membranes easily, which is crucial for the biodisponibility of the drug. Because of the high interest in SCF3 containing molecules, well-built methods for their insertion into organic molecules have been widely investigated. Specifically, both the racemic and the enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation reaction on β-keto esters have been widely explored.

4.1. Metal-Catalyzed Methods

The work of Gade’s group [72] is the only example found in the literature, as far as we know, regarding the metal-catalyzed trifluoromethylthiolation of β-keto esters. The methodology consists on the use of chiral copper–boxmi complex (Scheme 9). They applied their broad experience in the use of this chiral pincer ligand in other reactions such as the asymmetric Fe-boxmi catalysed azidation of β-keto esters [73] and the asymmetric Cu-boxmi catalysed trifluoromethylation of β-keto esters [38] among others. With their optimized reaction conditions, consisting in using one equivalent of Lu and Shen’s hypervalent iodine reagent 47 [74] to transfer a –SCF3 group. A wide range of substrates possessing indanone, tetralone, cyclopentenone and cyclohexenone (one example, 99% ee) cores were well tolerated, obtaining in all cases excellent enantiomeric excess values (Scheme 9). In general, the size of the ester group it is not crucial for achieving high enantioselectivity. Several mechanistic experiments, including EPR spectroscopy and 19F-NMR led the authors to propose a catalytic cycle (Scheme 9). The combination of copper (II) with boxmi ligand coordinates to the β-keto ester substrate, which is deprotonated by a triflate anion.
The triflic acid in situ acts as an activator of the hypervalent trifluoromethylthiolated iodine reagent 24, generated which is attacked by the β-keto ester enolate through the more accessible Re face (the Si face is efficiently blocked by boxmi). The product is evacuated of the catalytic cycle generating again the chiral catalyst (Scheme 9).

4.2. Organocatalytic Methods

The first organocatalyzed enantioselective methodology reported for the introduction of -SCF3 onto the α-position of a β-keto esters was developed independently in 2013 by Shen and Rueping. Shen’s group [75] reported the use of trifluoromethylthiolated hypervalent iodine 47 and a catalytic amount of quinine in toluene at 40 °C in the reaction of a series of adamantyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates (Scheme 10). The reactions of substrates with electron-withdrawing groups at the aromatic ring occurred with similar enantioselectivity to those of substrates with electron-donating groups, whereas the size of the ester group had a high impact on the enantioselectivity (Scheme 10). Interestingly, the methodology could be successfully applied to the adamantyl cyclopentanone β-keto ester (95% yield, 94% ee), but was not useful with larger ring size, such as tetralone derivatives.
In order to understand the differences in terms of enantioselectivity on these substrates, Shen proposed that the mechanism could proceed through two different pathways (Scheme 11). The first pathway (A) is based on the transfer of the SCF3 group from the hypervalent iodine reagent to the quinine, allowing the formation of a new SCF3-substituted quinine electrophile, which would be attacked by the nucleophilic enolized β-keto ester. The stochiometric mixture of Shen’s reagent 47 and quinine in toluene monitored by 19F-NMR ruled out this pathway, because the formation of new SCF3-substituted quinine electrophile was not evidenced. This experimental feature made the pathway B gain prominence, which consisted on a dual activation through simultaneous hydrogen bonding of the substrate and 47 to quinine (Scheme 11). This mechanism is steady since other cinchona alkaloids without the free OH group showed low reactivity. Moreover, this proposal is sterically congested and justifies the lack of reactivity of tetralone and 1-benzosuberone-derived β-keto esters. These more enolizable substrates form nonplanar enolates that are not able to generate the dual-activated intermediate, while the 1-indanone enolates are planar and fit very well in this model.
Then, to expand the scope to the more enolizable 1-tetralone or 1-benzosuberone-derived β-keto esters, they assayed cinchona alkaloids based chiral phase-transfer catalysts, yielding the trifluoromethylthiolated quaternary β-keto esters in great yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 12). Interestingly enough, the reaction of the indanone derivatives through the use of PTC occurred with low enantioselectivity, in contrast to the high enantioselectivity obtained when using quinine as catalyst. Despite the huge efforts done by Shen’s group, the methodology could not be applied to acyclic β-keto esters.
At the same time as this previous work, Rueping’s group [76] reported an organocatalytic scenario using quinidine as catalyst in dichloromethane and N-trifluoromethylthiophtalimide 48 as electrophilic -SCF3 source, an air and moisture stable reagent. The reaction gave excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 13). In general, the reactions of cyclic 1-indanone derivatives bearing various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents in different positions of the aromatic ring proceeded successfully to provide the corresponding products in high yields and excellent enantioselectivities (88–99% ee; Scheme 13). Furthermore, cyclopentenone β-keto esters underwent trifluoromethylthiolation under these conditions in moderate yields but excellent enantioselectivites. Additionally, this methodology accepted 1-tetralone based β-keto ester in a 46% yield and 95% ee.
Four years later, in 2017 Xue [77] wanted to cast some light into the mechanism of Rueping’s asymmetric electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation reaction using density functional theory studies. The Houk-Grayon is the commonly preferred model [78] for cinchona alkaloid-catalysed reactions, however after the evaluation of three different mechanistic scenarios (pathways A, B and C, Scheme 14), the calculations showed that the most preferred model was the Wynberg ion pair-hydrogen bonding model [79] (pathway B in Scheme 14) in which the SCF3 transfer from N-trifluoromethylthiophtalimide 25 to β-keto ester proceeds via an SN2-like saddle point transition state.
Du and collaborators, [80] reported in 2017 the asymmetric electrophilic trifluoro-methylthiolation of (E)-alkyl 3-benzylidene-2-oxocyclopentane carboxylates cyclopentanone using a bifunctional squaramide as organocatalyst and N-trifluoromethylthiosuccinimide (49) as an electrophilic reagent (Scheme 15a). After some experimentation, the squaramide derived from hydroquinine and D-glucopyranose (Scheme 15) afforded the most efficient catalyst. The same conditions were extended to ethyl 4-ethoxy-2-oxocyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylate in high yield and excellent ee (Scheme 15b). Additionally, the reaction of (E)-alkyl 3-benzylidene-2-oxocyclopentane carboxylates with 49 in presence of 2-mercapto-5-substituted benzaldehydes allowed the formation of a series of chiral spiro-cyclopentanone thiochromanes bearing an SCF3 group through a one pot electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation−sulfur−Michael/aldol cascade reaction (16 examples, 92–99% ee, Scheme 15c).

4.3. Methods Involving Chiral -SCF3 Reagents

The benefits of transferring a group from a chiral reagent to a prochiral substrate to give the enantiomerically pure product are indubitable, mainly because it offers a simple and straightforward strategy. For this reason, Shen and co-workers [81] put their efforts on designing new optically pure electrophilic -SCF3 containing reagents that could allow reliable methods for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure organic compounds. This field complements all the previous trifluoromethylthiolation strategies explained up to this point. A new family of optically pure (1S)-(−)-N-trifluoromethylthio-2,10-camphorsultam, and derivatives were synthesized and tested. The dimethoxycamphorsultam derivative 50 in THF, at −40 °C and in the presence of K2CO3 proved excellent for the asymmetric introduction of SCF3 into 1-indanone and 1-tetralone β-keto esters (Scheme 16). These conditions tolerated the presence of electron-donating groups in the aromatic ring, nevertheless for achieving high ee in the cases of less nucleophilic substrates (presence of electron-withdrawing groups in the aromatic ring) the reaction requires a higher temperature. Moreover, the effect of the steric hindrance of the ester group was significant for achieving high ee values.

5. Conclusions

During the past decade, both metal-catalyzed and organocatalyzed asymmetric processes have been devised, making asymmetric fluorination, trifluoromethylayion and trifluorothiomethylation a useful tool. Asymmetric fluorination of β-keto esters has been successfully achieved by different research groups in alkyl 1-indanone 2-carboxylates and alkyl 1-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphtalene-2-carboxylate substrates, independently of the bulkiness of the ester group. In the case of alkyl 2-oxocyclopentane-1-carboxylates and the corresponding cyclohexanes fluorinated products are generally obtained in lower ee. Moreover, acyclic β-keto esters are the most difficult β-keto esters substrates in this reaction in terms of reactivity. Notably, Ti/TADDOL complexes of Togni’s group was useful for a larger number of acyclic compounds. Several different excellent organocatalysts systems have been developed for 1-indanone derivatives; however new organocatalytic systems are still needed for 1-tetralone and acyclic β-keto esters derivatives. Generally NFSI is the selected reagent for asymmetric fluorinations.
In the case of nucleophilic reagents, remarkable results have been obtained for 1-indanone derivatives. However, new approaches that permit increase more the scope of substrates are still needed. Organocatalyzed fluorination of β-keto esters has proved to be highly efficient, bifunctional chiral thioureas derived from cinchona alkaloids giving really interesting results.
Different successful asymmetric metal-catalyzed trifluoromethylation approaches have been described by Gade’s and Vallribera’s groups. The results are excellent for 1-indanone derivatives. However, poor results have been obtained in the enantioselective fluorination of alkyl 2-oxo-cyclopentane and 2-oxocyclohexane-1-carboxylates. New metal-catalyzed methods also need to be developed for acyclic β-keto esters. In the trifluoromethylation cases, metal-catalyzed are superior to organocatalyzed described methods. However, combining both visible-light and phase-transfer-catalysts seems a good choice. Moreover, the design of new efficient chiral trifluoromethylating reagents is still needed.
Remarkable results have been obtained by Gade’s group in the asymmetric metal-catalyzed trifluoromethylthiolation. Competitive results were achieved with cinchone and squarimide derivatives as organocatalyts. Notably, the design and use of (1S)-(−)-N-trifluoromethylthio-2,10-camphorsultam chiral reagent in enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation reactions resulted an excellent option.
Generally, in terms of reagents, organocatalytic methods are more affordable than metal catalyzed methods mainly due to the cost of the chiral ligands. Finally, the creation of new fluorinated compounds is expected to remain a major focus of interest next years and therefore still more new fluorinating, trifluoromethylating and trifluoromethylthiolating processes will be required.

Funding

This research was funded by Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) CTQ2016-81797-REDC, RED2018-102387-T, Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RTI2018-097853-B-I00) and DURSI-Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR2017-0465).

Acknowledgments

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain (CTQ2016-81797-REDC and RED2018-102387-T). Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) of Spain (RTI2018-097853-B-I00). DURSI-Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR2017-0465). UAB is acknowledged by A.G. for his postdoctoral contract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kirsch, P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gladysz, J.A.; Curran, D.E.; Horváth, I.T. Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. O’Hagan, D. Understanding Organofluorine Chemistry. An Introduction to the C–F Bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Müller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Fluorine in Pharmaceuticals: Looking Beyond Intuition. Science 2007, 317, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ilardi, E.A.; Vitaku, E.; Njardarson, J.T. Data-Mining for Sulfur and Fluorine: An Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals to Reveal Opportunities for Drug Design and Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 2832–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haufe, G.; Leroux, F. Fluorine in Life Sciences: Pharmaceuticals, Medicinal Diagnostics, and Agrochemicals. Volume Four in Alain Tressaud’s Progress in Fluorine Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meanwell, N.A. Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Isanbor, C.; O’Hagan, D. Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry: A Review of Anti-cancer Agents. J. Fluor. Chem. 2006, 127, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Sanchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J.L.; del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A.E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Liu, H. Fluorine in Pharmaceutical Industry: Fluorine-Containing Drugs Introduced to the Market in the Last Decade (2001–2011). Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gillis, E.P.; Eastman, K.J.; Hill, M.D.; Donnelly, D.J.; Meanwell, N.A. Application of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Smart, B.E. Fluorine Substituent Effects (on Bioactivity). J. Fluor. Chem. 2001, 109, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, B.K.; Kitteringham, N.R.; O’Neill, P.M. Metabolism of Fluorine-Containing Drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 443–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Purser, S.; Moore, P.R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ojima, I. Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology; Wiley-Blackwell: Hobpken, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Littich, R.; Scott, P.J.H. Novel Strategies for Fluorine-18 Radiochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1106–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tirotta, I.; Dichiarante, V.; Pigliacelli, C.; Cavallo, G.; Terraneo, G.; Bombelli, F.B.; Metrangolo, P.; Resnati, G. 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): From Design of Materials to Clinical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1106–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Harsanyi, A.; Sandford, G. Organofluorine Chemistry: Applications, Sources and Sustainability. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 2081–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Soler, R.; Badetti, E.; Moreno-Mañas, M.; Vallribera, A.; Sebastián, R.M.; Vera, F.; Serrano, J.L.; Sierra, T. Wide Temperature Range Mesomorphic Behaviour of Highly Fluorinated 15-Membered Macrocycles and their Open Trisulphonamide Precursor. Liq. Cryst. 2007, 34, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghosh, A.; Nakanishi, T. Frontiers of Solvent-free Functional Molecular Liquids. Chem. Comm. 2017, 53, 10344–10357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Montagut, A.M.; Galvez, E.; Shafir, A.; Sebastián, R.M.; Vallribera, A. Triarylmethane Dyes for Artificial Repellent Cotton Fibers. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 3810–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernini, R.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Forte, G.; Petrucci, F.; Prastaro, A.; Niembro, S.; Shafir, A.; Vallribera, A. Green Chemistry Perfluoro-tagged Phosphine-free Palladium Nanoparticles Supported on Silica Gel: Application to Alkynylation of Aryl Halides, Suzuki–Miyauracross-coupling, and Heck Reactions under Aerobic Conditions. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bernini, R.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Niembro, S.; Prastaro, A.; Shafir, A.; Vallribera, A. Perfluoro-Tagged Gold Nanoparticles Immobilized on Fluorous Silica Gel: A Reusable Catalyst for the Benign Oxidation and Oxidative Esterification of Alcohols. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salabert, J.; Sebastián, R.M.; Vallribera, A. Anthraquinone Dyes for Superhydrophobic Cotton. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14251–14254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schlögla, S.; Kramera, R.; Lenkoa, D.; Schröttnerb, H.; Schallerc, R.; Holznerc, A.; Kern, W. Fluorination of Elastomer Materials. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47, 2321–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, T.; Neumann, C.N.; Ritter, T. Introduction of Fluorine and Fluorine-Containing Functional Groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8214–8264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Orsi, D.L.; Altman, R.A. Exploiting the Unusual Effects of Fluorine in Methodology. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 7168–7181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ni, C.; Hu, J. The Unique Fluorine Effects in Organic Reactions: Recent Facts and Insights into Fluoroalkylations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5441–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhu, Y.; Han, J.; Wang, J.; Shibata, N.; Sodeoka, M.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Coelho, J.A.S.; Toste, F.D. Modern Approaches for Asymmetric Construction of Carbon−Fluorine Quaternary Stereogenic Centers: Synthetic Challenges and Pharmaceutical Needs. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3887–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, X.; Wu, T.; Phipps, R.J.; Toste, F.D. Advances in Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination, Mono-, Di-, and Trifluoromethylation, and Trifluoromethylthiolation Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 826–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lin, J.-H.; Xiao, J.-C. Recent Advances in Asymmetric Fluorination and Fluoroalkylation Reactions via Organocatalysis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 6147–6155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Toulgoat, F.; Alazet, S.; Billard, T. Direct Trifluoromethylthiolation Reactions: The “Renaissance” of an Old Concept. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2415–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hintermann, L.; Togni, A. Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoesters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4359–4362. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nagib, D.A.; Scott, M.E.; MacMillan, D.W. C Enantioselective α-Trifluoromethylation of Aldehydes via Photoredox Organocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10875–10877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Allen, A.E.; MacMillan, D.W.C. The Productive Merger of Iodonium Salts and Organocatalysis: A Non-photolytic Approach to the Enantioselective α-Trifluoromethylation of Aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4986–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Comelles, J.; Pericas, A.; Moreno-Mañas, M.; Vallribera, A.; Drudis-Solé, G.; Lledós, A.; Parella, T.; Roglans, A.; García-Granda, S.; Roces-Fernández, L. Highly Enantioselective Electrophilic Amination and Michael Addition of Cyclic β-Ketoesters Induced by Lanthanides and (S,S)-Ip-pybox:  The Mechanism. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pericas, A.; Shafir, A.; Vallribera, A. Asymmetric Synthesis of l-Carbidopa Based on a Highly Enantioselective α-Amination. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1448–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pericas, A.; Jiménez, R.; Granados, A.; Shafir, A.; Vallribera, A.; Roglans, A.; Molins, E. Lanthanides–pybox: An Excellent Combination for Highly Enantioselective Electrophilic α-Amination of Acyclic β-Keto Esters. Isolation of Ternary Pybox/Ln/β-Keto Ester Complexes. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 4305–4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deng, Q.-H.; Wadepohl, H.; Gade, L.H. Highly Enantioselective Copper-Catalyzed Electrophilic Trifluoromethylation of β-Ketoesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10769–10772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Differding, E.; Ofner, H. N-Fluorobenzenesulfonimide: A Practical Reagent for Electrophilic Fluorinations. Synlett 1991, 1991, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nyffeler, P.T.; Gonzalez, S.; Burkart, M.D.; Vicent, S.P.; Wong, C.-H. Selectfluor: Mechanistic Insight and Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Lu, H.; Zheng, W.-H. Development of Planar Chiral Iodoarenes Based on [2.2]Paracyclophane and Their Application in Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination of β-ketoesters. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2555–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pluta, R.; Krach, P.E.; Cavallo, L.; Falivene, L.; Rueping, M. Metal-free Catalytic Fluorination of Keto Esters Using a Combination of Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) and Oxidant: Experiment and Computation. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2582–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lectard, S.; Hamashima, Y.; Sodeoka, M. Recent Advances in Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination Reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2708–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bertogg, A.; Hintermann, L.; Huber, D.P.; Perseghini, M.; Sanna, M.; Togni, A. Substrate Range of the Titanium TADDOLate Catalyzed Asymmetric Fluorination of Activated Carbonyl Compounds. Helv. Chim. Acta 2012, 95, 353–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Balaraman, K.; Vasanthan, R.; Kesavan, V. Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoesters Using Tartrate Derived Bidentate Bioxazoline-Cu(II) Complexes. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2013, 24, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Copper(II) Triflate-bis(Oxazoline)-Catalyzed Enantioselective Electrophilic Fluorination of β-Ketoesters. Tetrahedron-Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1007–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, L.-S.; Wei, Y.-L.; Jiang, K.-Z.; Deng, Y.; Zheng, Z.-J.; Xua, L.-W. Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoamides Catalyzed by Ar-BINMOL-derived Salan Copper Complex. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 3769–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Peng, J.; Du, D.-M. Efficient Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoesters/amides Catalyzed by Diphenylamine-linked bis(thiazoline) and Cu(OTf)2 Complexes. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Shao, J.; Xu, D. Fast, Solvent-free and Highly Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Keto esters Catalyzed by Chiral Copper Complexes in a Ball Mill. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.-J.; Che, C.-M. Iron(III)–salan Complexes Catalysed Highly Enantioselective Fluorination and Hydroxylation of β-Keto esters and N-Boc oxindoles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 7870–7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hayamizu, K.; Teramaya, N.; Hashizume, D.; Dodo, K.; Sodeoka, M. Unique Features of Chiral Palladium Enolates Derived from β-Ketoamide: Structure and Catalytic Asymmetric Michael and Fluorination Reactions. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 6594–6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Niu, T.; Han, X.; Huang, D.; Wang, K.-H.; Su, Y.; Hu, Y.; Fu, Y. Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoesters Catalysed by Complexes of New Mono-oxazoline Ligands. J. Fluor. Chem. 2015, 175, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Granados, A.; Sarró, P.; Vallribera, A. Catalytic Asymmetric Fluorination of Alkyl 1-Indanone-2-carboxylates Ruled by Pybox-Eu(III) Combination. Molecules 2019, 24, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Blasius, C.K.; Ren, B.-T.; Liu, Y.-K.; Li, B.; Michalsky, I.; Wadepohl, H.; Dend, Q.-H.; Gade, L.H. Expanding the Boxmi Ligand Family: Synthesis and Application of NON and NSN Ligands. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 6719–6731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kim, D.Y.; Park, E.J. Catalytic Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Keto Esters by Phase-Transfer Catalysis Using Chiral Quaternary Ammonium Salts. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, X.; Lan, Q.; Shirakawa, S.; Maruoka, K. Chiral Bifunctional Phase Transfer Catalysts for Asymmetric Fluorination of β-Keto esters. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tanzer, E.-M.; Schweizer, W.B.; Ebert, M.-O.; Gilmour, R. Designing Fluorinated Cinchona Alkaloids for Enantioselective Catalysis: Controlling Internal Rotation by a Fluorine-Ammonium Ion Gauche Effect (ΦNCCF). Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 2006–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shang, J.-Y.; Li, L.; Lu, Y.; Yang, K.-F.; Xu, L.-X. Enantioselective Fluorination Reaction of β-Keto Ester- Catalyzed Chiral Primary Amine-Based Multifunctional Catalyst Systems. Synth. Commun. 2014, 44, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, J.; Hu, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, K.-H.; Xu, C. Thiourea-Catalyzed Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Keto Esters. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Novacek, J.; Waser, M. Synthesis and Applications of (Thio)Urea-Containing Chiral Quaternary Ammonium Salt Catalysts. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mori, K.; Miyake, A.; Akiyama, T. Enantioselective Fluorination of β-Ketoesters Catalyzed by Chiral Sodium Phosphate: Remarkable Enhancement of Reactivity by Simultaneous Utilizationof Metal Enolate and Metal Phosphate. Chem. Lett. 2014, 43, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lehmann, F. Chemical Constitution and Activity. Aromatic Fluorine Compounds. Arch. Exp. Pathol. Pharmakol. 1928, 130, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yagupol’skii, L.M.; Kondratenko, N.V.; Timofeeva, G.N. Fluoro(trifluoromethyl)aryl- and (trifluoromethyl)diarylsulfonium Salts. Zhurnal Org. Khimii 1984, 20, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  64. Umemoto, T.; Ishihara, S. Power-variable Electrophilic Trifluoromethylating Agents. S-, Se-, and Te-(trifluoromethyl)dibenzothio-, -Seleno-, and -Tellurophenium Salt System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2156–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. Mild Electrophilic Trifluoromethylation of β-Ketoesters and Silyl Enol Ethers with 5-Trifluoro Methyldibenzothiophenium Tetrafluoroborate. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Granados, A.; Rivilla, I.; Cossío, F.P.; Vallribera, A. Lanthanum-Catalyzed Enantioselective Trifluoromethylation by Using an Electrophilic Hypervalent Iodine Reagent. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8214–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ma, J.A.; Cahard, D. Strategies for Nucleophilic, Electrophilic, and Radical Trifluoromethylations. J. Fluor. Chem. 2007, 128, 975–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Noritake, S.; Shibata, N.; Nomura, Y.; Huang, Y.; Matsnev, A.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Cahard, D. Enantioselective Electrophilic Trifluoromethylation of β-Keto esters with Umemoto Reagents Induced by Chiral Nonracemic Guanidines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3599–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Woźniak, L.; Murphy, J.J.; Melchiorre, P. Photo-organocatalytic Enantioselective Perfluoroalkylation of β-Ketoesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5678–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yang, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, Y.-H.; Xue, X.-S.; Li, X.; Cheng, J.-P. Origin of Stereoselectivity of the Photoinduced Asymmetric Phase-Transfer-Catalyzed Perfluoroalkylation of β-Ketoesters. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 9321–9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Toulgoat, F.; Billard, T. Toward CF3S Group: From Trifluoromethylation of Sulfides to Direct Trifluoromethylthiolation. In Modern Synthesis Processes and Reactivity of Fluorinated Compounds; Groults, H., Leroux, F., Tressaud, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 141–179. [Google Scholar]
  72. Deng, Q.-H.; Rettenmeier, C.; Wadepohl, H.; Gade, L.H. Copper–Boxmi Complexes as Highly Enantioselective Catalysts for Electrophilic Trifluoromethylthiolations. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Deng, Q.-H.; Bleith, T.; Wadepohl, H.; Gade, L.H. Enantioselective Iron-Catalyzed Azidation of β-Keto Esters and Oxindoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5356–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shao, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, T.; Lu, L.; Shen, Q. An Electrophilic Iodine Reagent for Trifluoromethylthiolation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3457–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, X.; Yang, T.; Cheng, X.; Shen, Q. Enantioselective Electrophilic Trifluoromethylthiolation of β-Ketoesters: A Case of Reactivity and Selectivity Bias for Organocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12860–12864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bootwicha, T.; Liu, X.; Pluta, R.; Atodiresei, I.; Rueping, M. N-Trifluoromethylthiophthalimide: A Stable Electrophilic SCF3-Reagent and its Application in the Catalytic Asymmetric Trifluoromethylsulfenylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12856–12859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, M.; Xue, X.-S.; Cheng, J.-P. Mechanism and Origins of Stereoinduction in Natural Cinchona Alkaloid Catalyzed Asymmetric Electrophilic Trifluoromethylthiolation of β-Keto Esters with N-Trifluoromethylthiophthalimide as Electrophilic SCF3 Source. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7977–7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Grayson, M.N.; Houk, K.N.J. Cinchona Alkaloid-Catalyzed Asymmetric Conjugate Additions: The Bifunctional Brønsted Acid–Hydrogen Bonding Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1170–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Hiemstra, H.; Wynberg, H. Addition of Aromatic Thiols to Conjugated Cycloalkenones, Catalyzed by Chiral/3-HydroxyAmines. A Mechanistic Study on Homogeneous Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhao, B.-L.; Du, D.-M. Enantioselective Squaramide-Catalyzed Trifluoromethylthiolation− Sulfur−Michael/Aldol Cascade Reaction: One-Pot Synthesis of CF3S-Containing Spiro Cyclopentanone−Thiochromanes. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1036–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, H.; Leng, X.; Wan, X.; Shen, Q. (1S)-(−)-N-Trifluoromethylthio-2,10-camphorsultam and its Derivatives: Easily Available, Optically Pure Reagents for Asymmetric Trifluoromethylthiolation. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 25 03264 g001 550
Figure 1. Mostly common electrophilic and nucleophilic fluorinating reagents.
Figure 1. Mostly common electrophilic and nucleophilic fluorinating reagents.
Molecules 25 03264 g001
Molecules 25 03264 g002 550
Figure 2. Chiral ligands and metals combinations for the catalytic enantioselective fluorination of β-keto esters.
Figure 2. Chiral ligands and metals combinations for the catalytic enantioselective fluorination of β-keto esters.
Molecules 25 03264 g002
Molecules 25 03264 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Cyclic β-keto esters 11–20.
Scheme 1. Cyclic β-keto esters 11–20.
Molecules 25 03264 sch001
Molecules 25 03264 g003 550
Figure 3. Results for substituted derivatives 21–28.
Figure 3. Results for substituted derivatives 21–28.
Molecules 25 03264 g003
Molecules 25 03264 g004 550
Figure 4. Fluorinated acyclic β-keto esters prepared by Togni’s research group [44].
Figure 4. Fluorinated acyclic β-keto esters prepared by Togni’s research group [44].
Molecules 25 03264 g004
Molecules 25 03264 g005 550
Figure 5. Examples of acyclic β-keto esters used for validation of methodologies. Reaction conditions are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2; all the results correspond to optimized conditions.
Figure 5. Examples of acyclic β-keto esters used for validation of methodologies. Reaction conditions are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 2; all the results correspond to optimized conditions.
Molecules 25 03264 g005
Molecules 25 03264 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Proposed catalytic cycle [53].
Scheme 2. Proposed catalytic cycle [53].
Molecules 25 03264 sch002
Molecules 25 03264 g006 550
Figure 6. Structure of different organocatalysts.
Figure 6. Structure of different organocatalysts.
Molecules 25 03264 g006
Molecules 25 03264 g007 550
Figure 7. Plausible intermediate proposed by Hu [59].
Figure 7. Plausible intermediate proposed by Hu [59].
Molecules 25 03264 g007
Molecules 25 03264 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Combination of hydrogen fluoride and an oxidant mediated by an hypervalent iodine compound. Plausible mechanism.
Scheme 3. Combination of hydrogen fluoride and an oxidant mediated by an hypervalent iodine compound. Plausible mechanism.
Molecules 25 03264 sch003
Molecules 25 03264 sch004a 550Molecules 25 03264 sch004b 550
Scheme 4. Reaction conditions and scope for the enantioselective electrophilic trifluoromethylation of five- and six-membered cyclic β-keto esters.
Scheme 4. Reaction conditions and scope for the enantioselective electrophilic trifluoromethylation of five- and six-membered cyclic β-keto esters.
Molecules 25 03264 sch004aMolecules 25 03264 sch004b
Molecules 25 03264 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Electrophilic enantioselective α-trifluoromethylation of cyclic β-keto esters under La(III)/(R,S)-ind-pybox catalysis. Scope and proposed mechanism based on experimental and computational techniques.
Scheme 5. Electrophilic enantioselective α-trifluoromethylation of cyclic β-keto esters under La(III)/(R,S)-ind-pybox catalysis. Scope and proposed mechanism based on experimental and computational techniques.
Molecules 25 03264 sch005
Molecules 25 03264 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Asymmetric trifluoromethylation of methyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylate using the Umemoto’s reagent and hydroquinine.
Scheme 6. Asymmetric trifluoromethylation of methyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylate using the Umemoto’s reagent and hydroquinine.
Molecules 25 03264 sch006
Molecules 25 03264 sch007a 550Molecules 25 03264 sch007b 550
Scheme 7. Asymmetric organocatalytic trifluoromethylation developed by Shibata and the proposed transition state (TS).
Scheme 7. Asymmetric organocatalytic trifluoromethylation developed by Shibata and the proposed transition state (TS).
Molecules 25 03264 sch007aMolecules 25 03264 sch007b
Molecules 25 03264 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Conditions and mechanism for the visible-light-driven PTC catalyzed enantioselective perfluoroalkylation and trifluoromethylation of cyclic β-keto esters assembled by Melchiorre.
Scheme 8. Conditions and mechanism for the visible-light-driven PTC catalyzed enantioselective perfluoroalkylation and trifluoromethylation of cyclic β-keto esters assembled by Melchiorre.
Molecules 25 03264 sch008
Molecules 25 03264 sch009 550
Scheme 9. Copper-boxmi electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation of several β-keto esters and the proposed catalytic cycle.
Scheme 9. Copper-boxmi electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation of several β-keto esters and the proposed catalytic cycle.
Molecules 25 03264 sch009
Molecules 25 03264 sch010 550
Scheme 10. Organocatalyzed trifluoromethylthiolation of adamantyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates. Reaction conditions and scope.
Scheme 10. Organocatalyzed trifluoromethylthiolation of adamantyl 1-indanone-2-carboxylates. Reaction conditions and scope.
Molecules 25 03264 sch010
Molecules 25 03264 sch011 550
Scheme 11. Proposed mechanisms for the quinine-catalyzed asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation reaction.
Scheme 11. Proposed mechanisms for the quinine-catalyzed asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation reaction.
Molecules 25 03264 sch011
Molecules 25 03264 sch012 550
Scheme 12. Scope of asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation of β-keto esters mediated by PTCs.
Scheme 12. Scope of asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation of β-keto esters mediated by PTCs.
Molecules 25 03264 sch012
Molecules 25 03264 sch013 550
Scheme 13. Scope of the enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation.
Scheme 13. Scope of the enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation.
Molecules 25 03264 sch013
Molecules 25 03264 sch014 550
Scheme 14. Possible models for the Rueping’s asymmetric electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation.
Scheme 14. Possible models for the Rueping’s asymmetric electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation.
Molecules 25 03264 sch014
Molecules 25 03264 sch015 550
Scheme 15. (a,b) Enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation of cycloalkenones driven by squaramide catalyst. (c) Bifunctional squaramide-catalyzed electrophilic trifluoromethyl-thiolation−sulfur−Michael/aldol cascade reaction for the construction of -SCF3 containing spiro-cyclopentanone−thiochromanes.
Scheme 15. (a,b) Enantioselective trifluoromethylthiolation of cycloalkenones driven by squaramide catalyst. (c) Bifunctional squaramide-catalyzed electrophilic trifluoromethyl-thiolation−sulfur−Michael/aldol cascade reaction for the construction of -SCF3 containing spiro-cyclopentanone−thiochromanes.
Molecules 25 03264 sch015
Molecules 25 03264 sch016 550
Scheme 16. Asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation of 1-indanone and 1-tetralone β-keto esters using the chiral SCF3 reagent 50.
Scheme 16. Asymmetric trifluoromethylthiolation of 1-indanone and 1-tetralone β-keto esters using the chiral SCF3 reagent 50.
Molecules 25 03264 sch016

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Granados, A.; Vallribera, A. Asymmetric Preparation of α-Quaternary Fluorinated β-keto Esters. Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143264

AMA Style

Granados A, Vallribera A. Asymmetric Preparation of α-Quaternary Fluorinated β-keto Esters. Review. Molecules. 2020; 25(14):3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Granados, Albert, and Adelina Vallribera. 2020. "Asymmetric Preparation of α-Quaternary Fluorinated β-keto Esters. Review" Molecules 25, no. 14: 3264. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143264

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop