Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Micro-Scale Extraction of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Vitis vinifera Leaves with Ionic Liquid-Based Surfactants
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Fluorinated 3,6-Dihydropyridines and 2-(Fluoromethyl)pyridines by Electrophilic Fluorination of 1,2-Dihydropyridines with Selectfluor®
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant and Anticancer Potentials of Extracts from Rosa banksiae Ait. Flowers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Access to 3,5-Disubstituted 7-(Trifluoromethyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines Involving SNAr and Suzuki Cross-Coupling Reactions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Molecular Structure Modulated Trap Distribution and Carrier Migration in Fluorinated Epoxy Resin

1
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Education Ministry, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Measurement and Electric Machine Control Laboratory, Tokyo City University, 1-28-1Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(13), 3071; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133071
Submission received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 3 July 2020 / Published: 6 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorine Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Surface charge accumulation on epoxy insulators is one of the most serious problems threatening the operation safety of the direct current gas-insulated transmission line (GIL), and can be efficiently inhibited by the surface modification technology. This paper investigated the mechanisms of fluorination modulated surface charge behaviors of epoxy resin through quantum chemical calculation (QCC) analysis of the molecular structure. The results show that after fluorination, the surface charge dissipation process of the epoxy sample is accelerated by the introduced shallow trap sites, which is further clarified by the carrier mobility model. The electron distribution probability of the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) under positive charging and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) under negative charging shows distinctive patterns. It is illustrated that electrons are likely to aggregate locally around benzenes for the positively charged molecular structure, while electrons tend to distribute all along the epoxy chain under negatively charging. The calculated results verify that fluorination can modulate surface charge behaviors of epoxy resin through redesigning its molecular structure, trap distribution and charging patterns.

1. Introduction

With the development of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission, the gas-insulated transmission line (GIL) has been put into application all around the world [1,2,3]. Under the unipolar electric field, charges tend to deposit on the insulator surface during the long-term operation of the GIL, thus making the gas/solid interface the weak part of the whole system [4,5,6,7]. The local electric field concentration will be enhanced and may cause partial discharge, moreover, even results in flashover failure along the insulator surface [8,9]. As one of the main concerning topics, surface characteristics of the insulators are in urgent need to be improved, in which the structures of the epoxy resin play an extremely important role [10,11,12,13].
There exists a close relationship between the molecular structure and the macro properties of the epoxy resin. As a mature process, surface fluorination technology has been proved to be efficient for the modification of polymer materials in various researches, showing priorities of the simple operation and the low cost [14,15,16]. Studies have shown that in the fluorination process, F atoms can be introduced into the material and polymer chain breaking and crosslinking reactions may occur. The physical and chemical characteristics of the formed fluorinated surface layer depend on the fluorination conditions and the polymer material itself [17,18,19]. In addition, the regulation of the charge transport process can be attributed to the change of the surface state. Usually, charge migration has a great relation with the energy level distribution determined by molecular structure and its interaction [20,21].
Over the past few years, researchers have gradually focused on the molecular simulation and the quantum chemical calculation (QCC) of small size molecules to reveal the charge transport characteristics which greatly facilitates the researches of developing novel DC insulation materials and analyzing various space and surface charge behaviors [22,23,24,25]. The studies have attracted much concern on the physiochemical characteristics of the polymer by calculation and analysis from the molecule level [26,27,28]. The common theory is quantum theory, and quantum chemical calculation is used to show the structure of the molecules and the interaction between the molecules, helping to predict the electron behavior and figure out the material properties and their internal relationship with the structure. With the development of the framework and numerical methods, the density functional theory (DFT) has become a powerful research tool, for exploring the structural and the transport properties of the polymer material considering the effects of different electric fields [29,30,31,32,33]. However, the physical mechanism of fluorination modulated surface charge behaviors hasn’t been revealed from the point of molecular orbital view.
In this paper, surface charge behaviors of original and fluorinated epoxy samples were investigated through the surface potential decay (SPD) experiment. The trap distribution was calculated and compared. Then the quantum calculation model was established, based on which the trap distribution and molecular orbitals were obtained for positively and negatively charged epoxy, respectively. The relationship between the carrier migration and trap sites was also analyzed. The mechanism was discussed, providing a reference for the in-depth understanding of the physiochemical process during the fluorination treatment.

2. Results

2.1. Surface Charge Behaviors

Figure 1 shows the surface charge decay process and trap distribution of epoxy before and after fluorination. It can be seen in Figure 1a that the surface charge dissipation rate is quite slow for the original epoxy samples, whether the polarity of the pre-corona charging voltage is positive or negative. After being treated by the surface fluorination for 30 min, the initial density of the surface charge is decreased significantly. In addition, the density value can be reduced to a half in approximately 200 s, with a much faster rate than that of the original one. Additionally, compared with the positive surface charges, the negative charges possess a higher dissipation speed, which applies to all the samples.
According to Figure 1b, original samples mainly contain deep traps under positive voltage. As for the trap distribution under negative voltage, there exist a few shallow traps and the density of the deep traps is decreased. After the fluorination, shallow traps of the sample are generated at about 0.73–0.78 eV, meanwhile the deep trap level decreases to 0.82–0.85 eV. There will inevitably be traps in the epoxy resin matrix due to the unsaturated bonds and branched chain structures, most of which are deep ones. When treated by the F2, the substitution and addition reactions also inevitably cause structural changes. These structural changes or disturbances caused by chain scission and substitution and addition reactions are equivalent to physical traps, which are known to possess a much shallower trap depth than that of chemical traps. Furthermore, the density of both the deep and shallow traps under negative voltage is lower than that under positive voltage, which will be discussed later.

2.2. Trap Site Modulation

Figure 2 shows the energy level and trap sites distribution of epoxy resin before and after fluorination treatment. For original epoxy, there are some apparent deep electron and hole traps, and correspondingly, surface charge dissipation is much slow. After fluorination, some of the deep electron trap sites disappear and some deep hole trap sites get much shallower. It should be noted that although the detailed trap sites should be obtained by locating the energy level with related molecular structure, such apparent trap sites can also reflect the changes before and after fluorination. Additionally, the increase of the band gap indicates the effects of the treatment, elevating the energy required by the electrons and raising the barrier of electron migration between different lattices.

3. Discussion

3.1. Carrier Hopping Process

The carrier migration velocity and hopping probability are calculated using Formulas (1) and (2).
v = μ E = μ 0 E   θ h o p = v 0   θ h o p
θ h o p = τ c τ c + τ t =   exp   ( φ t k   T )
where v is migration velocity, E is electric field strength, μ is carrier mobility, θnop is ratio of free carrier density to total carrier density are calculated, τc is hopping time, τt is trapping time, T is absolute temperature, φt is barrier height, k is Boltzmann constant.
The relationship between the carrier hopping process and trap sites is shown in Figure 3. The carrier migration is determined by the trap distribution to a certain extent. Among shallow trap sites, the hopping probability of carriers is higher and migration time is shorter, which is due to the low barrier height, compared with that of deep trap sites. The analysis above can explain the intrinsic association among the trap sites, carrier hopping process and surface potential decay process. After fluorination, the traps become shallower; thus, the free carriers increase and the carriers obtain faster migration velocity, finally resulting in the dissipation of the surface charges.

3.2. Polarity Effects

Figure 4 shows the energy level distribution and molecular orbitals of epoxy resin under different charging conditions. As is shown in Figure 4a, there is a significant change in energy level of positively or negatively charged epoxy. For the negatively charged condition, newly introduced energy levels, like 1.43 eV, show the state of trapped electrons. Additionally, there appears a new energy level at about −7.14 eV due to the effect of positive charges distributed in the epoxy samples. The whole distribution of the energy level is elevated when negatively charged and decreased when positive charged compared with the neutral situation. The distribution of energy levels determines the transition and transport of electrons.
Figure 4b shows the molecular orbitals of LUMO level under negatively charging and HOMO level under positively charging, which means the epoxy network is charged with different polarities. The red and blue parts represent different spin directions. For the negatively charging, it can be seen that electrons are distributed all along the epoxy molecular chains, which are relatively easy to migrate. However, as for the positively charged situation, electrons are limited in the local trap sites and are difficult to move freely. Thus, the macro electrical properties show a significant relationship with the structure of the molecule. The movement of the electrons are restricted based on the molecular orbitals of HOMO level under positively charging, correspondingly, the surface charge accumulation will be more serious under positive DC voltage.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Preparation

First, sheet samples with a thickness of 0.05 cm and side length of 9 cm were obtained by hot pressing. The samples consist of epoxy matrix of CT 5531 and curing agent of HY 5533 from ARADUR® (Shanghai, China). The fluorination process was conducted in a sealed reactor and the samples were treated with the F2/N2 gas mixture containing 20 vol% F2 under the temperature of 25 °C for 30 min. Based on our previous research, the fluorination time was chosen as 30 min to make a comparison with the original sample [2,18]. The surface charge decay process was tested with the temperature as a constant of 25 °C and the humidity kept as 28%, avoiding the error caused by the experimental environment and increasing the testing accuracy. The experimental setup and trap distribution calculation method were introduced in our previous paper [18].

4.2. QCC Calculation Model

The calculated structure is simplified from methyl-tetrahydrophthalic-anhydride cured bisphenol A epoxy resin. After fluorination, ortho hydrogen atoms are replaced by fluorine atoms and the double bond has an addition reaction, as shown in Figure 5. In this work, the kinetic energy distribution and molecular orbitals were calculated using DFT with the B3LYP hamiltonian and the 6-31G basis function in Gaussian 09 software (Wallingford, CT, USA). The calculation method was described in our previous paper [22,34].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, based on the experimental tests and the model analysis, the charging modulation mechanisms of epoxy resin were analyzed by quantum chemical calculation from the perspective of molecular orbital, and the relationship between the molecule structure and the electron migration is established. The conclusions can be summarized as follows.
After the corona charging treatment, the initial charge density of the fluorinated epoxy sample was reduced, and the rate of the surface charge dissipation was accelerated. Correspondingly, the density and the level of traps become lower compared with those of the original sample, affecting the carrier hopping process. The charges migration takes less time and holds a higher carrier mobility. Additionally, the positively or negatively charged epoxy possesses different molecular orbitals. Electrons tend to be distributed along the epoxy chain under negatively charging, which shows a greater probability of movement and is consistent with the law of surface charge dissipation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.R., H.Y. and B.D.; methodology, J.L., H.Y., T.T. and Z.R.; software, H.Y. and T.T.; formal analysis, Z.R. and Y.W.; investigation, J.L. and Z.R.; resources, B.D. and T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and Z.R.; writing—review and editing, H.Y. and J.L.; project administration, B.D.; funding acquisition, J.L. and B.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51807136, 51537008 and U1966203); Project supported by the State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment and System Security (SKLD19KM08); National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX201700168).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vikharev, A.P. Calculation of the thermal regime of gas-insulated electrical transmission lines. Power Tech. Eng. 2019, 52, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Du, B.X.; Ran, Z.Y.; Jin, L.; Liang, H.C. Novel insulator with interfacial σ-FGM for DC compact gaseous insulated pipeline. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 818–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Magier, T.; Tenzer, M.; Koch, H. Direct current gas-insulated transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2018, 33, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, B.Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, G. A self-assembled, nacre-mimetic, nano-laminar structure as a superior charge dissipation coating on insulators for HVDC gas-insulated systems. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 18046–18051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tschentscher, M.; Franck, C.M. Microscopic charge provision at interfaces of gas-insulated (HVDC/HVAC) systems. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, G.M.; Zhou, H.Y.; Liu, S.P.; Wang, Y.; Tu, Y.P. Measurement and simulation of charge accumulation on a disc spacer with electro-thermal stress in SF6 Gas. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, C.Y.; Lin, C.J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Liu, W.D.; Li, Q.; Hu, J.; He, S.; Liu, X.L.; He, J.L. Novel HVDC spacers by adaptively controlling surface charges-Part I: Charge transport and control strategy. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1238–1247. [Google Scholar]
  8. Purnomoadi, A.P.; Mor, A.R.; Smit, J.J. Spacer flashover in gas insulated switchgear (GIS) with humid SF6 under different electrical stresses. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 116, 105559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Liang, H.C.; Du, B.X.; Wang, Z.H. Surface functional graded spacer for compact HVDC gaseous insulated system. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, S.H.; Li, S.T.; Wang, S.H. Surface flashover properties of epoxy based nanocomposites containing functionalized Nano-TiO2. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rivera Lopez, M.Y.; Lambas, J.M.; Stacey, J.P.; Gamage, S.; Suliga, A.; Viquerat, A.; Scarpa, F.; Hamerton, I. Development of cycloaliphatic Epoxy-POSS nanocomposite matrices with enhanced resistance to atomic oxygen. Molecules 2020, 25, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, Z.; Li, S.; Niu, H.; Frechette, M.; Wang, W.; Huang, Y. DC surface flashover of epoxy nanocomposites in vacuum. IEEE Nanotech. Mag. 2018, 12, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Razquin, I.; Iregui, A.; Orduna, L.; Martin, L.; González, A.; Irusta, L. Reprogrammable permanent shape memory materials based on reversibly crosslinked epoxy/PCL blends. Molecules 2020, 25, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Han, J.; Butler, G.; Moriwaki, H.; Konno, H.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Kitamura, T. Kitamura electrophilic fluorination using HF as a source of fluorine. Molecules 2020, 25, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Delgado, M.C.R.; Pigg, K.R.; Da, S.F.D.A.; Gruhn, N.E.; Sakamoto, Y.; Suzuki, T. Impact of perfluorination on the charge-transport parameters of Oligoacene crystals. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1502–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuraoku, D.; Yonamine, T.; Koja, G.; Yoshida, N.; Arimitsu, S.; Higashi, M. Effects of water addition on a catalytic fluorination of dienamine. Molecules 2019, 24, 3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Oh, Y.-H.; Choi, H.; Park, C.; Kim, D.W.; Lee, S. Harnessing ionic interactions and hydrogen bonding for nucleophilic fluorination. Molecules 2020, 25, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Du, B.X.; Li, J. Surface charge coupling behavior of fluorinated polyimide film under DC and pulse voltage. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017, 24, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. An, Z.; Yin, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, F.; Lei, Q. and Zhang, Y. Modulation of surface electrical properties of epoxy resin insulator by changing fluorination temperature and time. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.W.; Gao, F.K.; Cao, D.K.; Putson, C.; Song, C.; Chen, W. Modeling of charge transport in insulating dielectric for gas-insulated transmission line based on multiple trap levels. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, S.H.; Wang, S.T.; Nazir, M.T.; Wang, W.; Takada, T. Surface trap effects on flashover voltages of epoxy/Al2O3 nanocomposites for high voltage insulation. Mater. Electr. 2019, 30, 18135–18143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takada, T.; Kikuchi, H.; Miyake, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Hayase, Y. Determination of charge-trapping sites in saturated and aromatic polymers by quantum chemical calculation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Selvaraju, K.; Jayalakshmi, P.; Jothi, B.; Palanisamy, S. Structural, electrostatic and transport properties of tetracene under applied electric field using quantum chemical calculations. Elixir Appl. Chem. 2014, 75, 27494–27500. [Google Scholar]
  24. Taroni, T.; Meroni, D.; Fidecka, K.; Maggioni, D.; Longhi, M.; Ardizzone, S. Halloysite nanotubes functionalization with phosphonic acids: Role of surface charge on molecule localization and reversibility. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 486, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hesterberg, R.; Macchi, P.; Hulliger, J. Polarization, inner and outer field, and surface charge compensation of a molecular crystal. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 7460–7469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valerij, K. Stereochemistry of simple molecules inside nanotubes and fullerenes: Unusual behavior of usual systems. Molecules 2020, 25, 2437. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharma, A.K.; Sloan, R.; Wiggins, J.S. Epoxy hybrid networks with high mass fraction molecular-level dispersion of pendant polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS). Polymer 2017, 114, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wei, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, C.; Du, S. Fabrication of high gas barrier epoxy nanocomposites: An approach based on layered silicate functionalized by a compatible and reactive modifier of epoxy-diamine adduct. Molecules 2018, 23, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nolasco, M.M.; Araujo, C.F.; Vaz, P.D.; Amado, A.M.; Ribeiro-Claro, P. Vibrational dynamics of crystalline 4-Phenylbenzaldehyde from INS spectra and periodic DFT calculations. Molecules 2020, 25, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ghorbanzadeh Ahangari, M.; Fereidoon, A.; Jahanshahi, M.; Ganji, M.D. Electronic and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes interacting with epoxy: A DFT study. Low Dimen. Syst. Nanostruc. 2013, 48, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chumakov, Y.; Matouzenko, G.S.; Borshch, S.A.; Postnikov, A. Quantum chemical studies of spin crossover polymers: Periodic DFT approach. Polyhedron 2009, 28, 1955–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Liu, H. Development of 3D polymer DFT and its application to molecular transport through a surfactant-covered interface. Aiche J. 2018, 64, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Endo, K.; Shimada, S.; Kato, N.; Ida, T. Analysis of valence XPS and AES of (PP, P4VP, PVME, PPS, PTFE) polymers by DFT calculations using the model molecules. J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1122, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, J.; Liang, H.C.; Xiao, M.; DU, B.X.; Takada, T. Mechanism of deep trap sites in epoxy/graphene nanocomposite using quantum chemical calculation. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2019, 26, 1577–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: All samples are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Surface potential decay process and trap distribution of epoxy resin before and after fluorination. (a) Relationship between the decay time and the surface charge density; (b) relationship between the energy level and the trap density of epoxy samples.
Figure 1. Surface potential decay process and trap distribution of epoxy resin before and after fluorination. (a) Relationship between the decay time and the surface charge density; (b) relationship between the energy level and the trap density of epoxy samples.
Molecules 25 03071 g001
Figure 2. Energy level distribution and trap sites of epoxy resin before and after fluorination treatment.
Figure 2. Energy level distribution and trap sites of epoxy resin before and after fluorination treatment.
Molecules 25 03071 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between carrier hopping process and trap sites. (a) Carrier hopping process for the shallow trap site; (b) Carrier hopping process for the deep trap site.
Figure 3. Relationship between carrier hopping process and trap sites. (a) Carrier hopping process for the shallow trap site; (b) Carrier hopping process for the deep trap site.
Molecules 25 03071 g003
Figure 4. Energy level distribution and molecular orbitals of epoxy resin under different charging conditions. (a) Energy level distribution of different charged epoxy; (b) molecular orbitals of LUMO under negatively charging and HOMO under positively charging.
Figure 4. Energy level distribution and molecular orbitals of epoxy resin under different charging conditions. (a) Energy level distribution of different charged epoxy; (b) molecular orbitals of LUMO under negatively charging and HOMO under positively charging.
Molecules 25 03071 g004aMolecules 25 03071 g004b
Figure 5. QCC models of epoxy resin before and after fluorination. (a) Model of epoxy resin; (b) Model of fluorinated epoxy resin.
Figure 5. QCC models of epoxy resin before and after fluorination. (a) Model of epoxy resin; (b) Model of fluorinated epoxy resin.
Molecules 25 03071 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Ran, Z.; Yao, H.; Du, B.; Takada, T. Molecular Structure Modulated Trap Distribution and Carrier Migration in Fluorinated Epoxy Resin. Molecules 2020, 25, 3071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133071

AMA Style

Li J, Wang Y, Ran Z, Yao H, Du B, Takada T. Molecular Structure Modulated Trap Distribution and Carrier Migration in Fluorinated Epoxy Resin. Molecules. 2020; 25(13):3071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jin, Yufan Wang, Zhaoyu Ran, Hang Yao, Boxue Du, and Tatsuo Takada. 2020. "Molecular Structure Modulated Trap Distribution and Carrier Migration in Fluorinated Epoxy Resin" Molecules 25, no. 13: 3071. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133071

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop