Next Article in Journal
Active Components, Antioxidant, Inhibition on Metabolic Syndrome Related Enzymes, and Monthly Variations in Mature Leaf Hawk Tea
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Transition Metal Catalysts in Electrochemically Induced Aromatic Phosphonation
Previous Article in Journal
New G-Quadruplex-Forming Oligodeoxynucleotides Incorporating a Bifunctional Double-Ended Linker (DEL): Effects of DEL Size and ODNs Orientation on the Topology, Stability, and Molecularity of DEL-G-Quadruplexes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Sensitive Immunoelectrochemical Measurement of Lung Cancer Tumor Marker ProGRP Based on TiO2-Au Nanocomposite

1
Department of Oncology, Henan Academy Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China
2
School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(4), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040656
Submission received: 19 December 2018 / Revised: 31 January 2019 / Accepted: 6 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Electrochemistry 2019)

Abstract

:
Progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), which is known to be highly specific and sensitive to small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has been proven to be a valuable substitute for neuron-specific enolase in SCLC diagnostics and monitoring, especially in its early stages. The detection of ProGRP levels also facilitates a selection of therapeutic treatments. For the fabrication of our proposed biosensor, titanium (IV) oxide microparticles were first used, followed by dispersing gold nanoparticles into chitosan and immobilizing them onto a carbon paste electrode (CPE) surface. The developed immunosensor exhibits a much higher biosensing performance in comparison with current methods, when it comes to the detection of ProGRP. Therefore, the proposed CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP is excellent for the development of a compact diagnostics apparatus.

1. Introduction

As a substance that can be found in blood, urine, or body tissues, tumor markers can be found in elevated levels in cancer, among other tissue types. Tumor markers are classified into different groups that indicate different disease processes. Therefore, these tumor markers have been applied in the detection of cancer occurrence in oncology. Elevated tumor marker levels are known to indicate that a patient has a tumor. Therefore, the determination of tumor marker levels is of vital significance for disease screening, diagnostics and prognostics [1,2]. Several main tumor markers have been extensively analyzed for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, epithelial ovarian tumors, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, and others, including human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), prostate specific antigen (PSA), alphafetoprotein (AFP), carcinoma antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9, CA15-3), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Around the world, studies have been carried out for the development and the improvement of clinical bioassays via affordable and portable diagnostic apparatuses [3,4,5,6]. It is essential for the protein biomarkers to be detected quantitively and sensitively, since their detection is significant across many fields, including biomedical research and diagnostics [7], systems biology [8] and proteomics [9]. Traditional methods of protein detection are enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [10], radioimmunoassay (RIA) [11], electrophoretic immunoassay [12] and mass spectrometry-based proteomics [13]. However, they are lacking in sensitivity, time-consuming, expensive, and require complex instrumentation and substantial specimen volumes. Therefore, it is essential to develop low-cost, sensitive, rapid and facile techniques to detect protein for point-of-care treatments. Among the proposed biomarkers for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is outstanding [14]. Compared with NSE, progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) is more sensitive and specific in the detection of small cell lung cancer; thus, it has been used to complement NSE in the diagnosis and monitoring of SCLC, especially in its early stages [15]. Consisting of three isoforms expressed on the mRNA level, ProGRP is a precursor for neuropeptide gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), generated in SCLC cells. Because only the total amount of ProGRP in SCLC has been measured, the potential functions and interchanging protein expressions remain to be studied.
Point-of-care treatments require sensitive, operationally facile, low limit of detection (LOD), and low-cost sensors that could provide rapid 3 multiplexed protein detection in the serum of both healthy individuals and cancer patients. The use of liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) for the detection of protein biomarkers has been reported on; some simpler techniques such as surface plasmon resonance [16,17], carbon nanotube based immunosensors [18], microcantilevers [19], nanowire transistor arrays [20] and nanocrystals [21], have also been proposed. However, these methods need to be multiplexed. Immunoassay, a common strategy for the quantitative detection of tumor markers, especially in cases of clinical laboratory use [22], remains significantly applicable to fields including biochemical [23,24,25,26,27] and environmental detection [28]. Unfortunately, the traditional methods suffer from having some inner drawbacks, including a lack of precision, requiring a prolonged period of time, and having difficulty in realizing automation. Therefore, it is essential to develop portable, semi-automated and compact immunosensors for rapid screening.
Considering the small size of nanocomposite materials compared with bulk materials, the former shows some different features, such as the quantum size effect, electrochemical features, catalytical features, and optical features. Thereby, they have gained acceptance for use in a wide range of applications, spanning many different fields, such as electrochemical biosensor fabrication. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) a form of nanomaterial that are ranked as the most applied metallic nanoparticles in electroanalytical uses. AuNPs have the potential to create a proper microenvironment, almost the same as that of redox protein, but with more freedom in orientation. In addition, the aforementioned nanoparticle has been reported to provide a direct charge transfer via the conductive channels of gold nanocrystals and then to decrease the insulation effect of protein shells. Moreover, the insulation shell of enzymes could be penetrated by the nanomeric edges of gold particles, which decreases the distance between the biomolecular redox sites and the electrode for charge transfer. It has been well acknowledged that titanium (IV) oxide (TiO2) nanocomposites are commonly used biocompatible materials due to their distinctive features, and have gained extensive use in the bioengineering and biomedical fields since they are nontoxic, chemically inert and strongly oxidizing [29,30]. They have also been reported to be used in the immobilization of biomolecules as a promising interface due to their eco-friendliness [31] and have gained extensive application in photochemistry [32] and electrochemistry [33,34,35]. A carbon paste electrode (CPE) is made from a mixture of conducting graphite powder and a pasting liquid, which can offer an easily renewable surface for electron exchange and is widely used, mainly for voltammetric measurements.
The present work features a TiO2, AuNPs via chitosan (CS) -modified CPE, whereby a sensitive and renewable immunosensor (CPE/TiO2/(CS+Au)) was successfully prepared to determine the model reagent ProGRP. The analysis of ProGRP levels in adults is of vital importance for the diagnosis of lung cancer at early stages. Therefore, the ProGRP immunosensor configuration has the potential to provide convincing results. For a biochemical analysis, the major analytical techniques include the immunoassay methods based on the highly specific molecular recognition of antigens by antibodies [36,37]. In our case, the formation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody–antigen complexes on the final electrode was probed via the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox pair and monitored by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. Therefore, the developed immunosensor could be used for the determination of ProGRP in synthetic serum specimens.

2. Results and Discussion

The electrochemical properties of each assembly step of the modified electrode surface were investigated using CV and EIS measurements. Figure 1 showed the CV characterizations of the modified CPEs in a 1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution, whereas Figure 2 displays the EIS curves. As shown in Figure 1, the plain CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs) exhibited the maximal peak current. An obvious decrease in the peak current was observed after the anti-ProGRP was immobilized onto the surface of the electrode (CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP), which indicated that the active sites and effective area for the charge transfer were decreased. The decrease in active sites and effective area was due to the surface coverage of anti-ProGRP, which hid the exposure of TiO2 and AuNPs. In addition, the nonconducting state of the anti-ProGRP also decreased in response to [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−, during the CV scan. Albumin from bovine serum (BSA) was used to block the remaining active sites of the electrode surface. The interaction between the antibody and the antigen was completed after immersing the proposed immunosensor into the ProGRP solution (CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP). Considering the immunocomplex reaction of this configuration, the peak current was dramatically decreased. The schematic diagram of the sensor preparation is illustrated in Scheme 1.
The EIS spectra recorded for the different electrodes consisted of semicircle segments and a linear segment. The electron-transfer resistance (Ret), referred to the diameter of the former segment at higher frequencies whereas the diffusion process denoted the latter segment at lower frequencies. The EIS experiment was used to investigate the stepwise immunosensor fabrication. The calculation of the semicircles was based on the Randle’s cirquit. The phase angle of linear segments fitted well with the Warburg model. The EIS measurements of different modified CPE at various stages were shown in Figure 2, and the inset showed the optimized fitting circuit model [38]. An insignificant semicircle at high frequencies and a linear segment at low frequencies were observed in the Nyquistic diagram for the CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs), which indicated an extremely decreased Ret to redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−. An apparent increase in resistance for the redox probe was observed after the anti-ProGRP was immobilized, which demonstrated the distinctive property of the anti-ProGRP—electric insulation (the formation of a barrier for the charge transfer on the surface of the electrode), along with the completion of the modification process of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP. This was followed by immersing the BSA-blocked CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA into the ProGRP solution. The maximal Ret was observed at CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP, suggesting a desirable antibody-antigen reaction.
In spite of the convincing results provided by CVs and EIS spectra for the electrode modification, the CV measurement offered a more obvious drop than the EIS experiment. The results showed that CV exhibited a better performance in the characterization of modification in comparison with EIS, for the proposed CPE.
As shown in Figure 3, the impedimetric response of our proposed electrode was recorded as a function of the ProGRP concentration over a range of 10 to 500 ng/mL in PBS, that contained [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− for an incubation period of approximately 5 min. As the concentration of ProGRP was increased, a capacitance decrease was observed, possibly due to the varied dielectric/blocking features of the electrode–electrolyte interface, caused by the interaction between the antigen and the antibody. Considering the interaction between ProGRP and the anti-ProGRP, the capacitance decrease was expected to result from the distance increase between the electrolyte and the electrode. Furthermore, the capacitance magnitude decreased due to the interaction between ProGRP and the anti-ProGRP, which in turn was caused by the decrease in polar ProGRP protein molecules that replaced the water molecules on the surface of the electrode. The variation of capacitance with the concentration of analyte was plotted for the calibration of the capacitive immunosensor, with the linear relationship, obtained as 10–500 ng/mL. The variation in the capacitance of our proposed electrode was used as a function of the ProGRP concentration under similar conditions, with a linear regression coefficient (r2) of 0.991, shown for this sensor. The developed sensor was highly sensitive, possibly due to the increased surface area and the functional features of the CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs). The biosensor provided an excellent and effective performance, due to the increased loading capacity for antibody molecules, caused by the available functional groups present on the TiO2/(CS+AuNPs). Furthermore, the developed sensor showed a low LOD of 0.133 ng/mL (3σb/m).
The specificity of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP was investigated by incubating this immunoelectrode with 15 μL of pathogens and metabolites, including 300 ng/mL of ProGRP, 5 mM of ascorbic acid, 5 mM of uric acid, and 5 mM of glucose. As shown in Figure 4, after these pathogens were added into the proposed electrode, the electrochemical response showed no variations during the experiments, which suggested that the probe for ProGRP was highly specific.
For the investigation of the reproducibility of the immunoelectrode, ProGRP (300 ng/mL) was used with the proposed electrode, while the variation in the current magnitude was recorded. As shown in Figure 5A, no apparent variation was observed, which suggested that this electrode was highly precise. The CVs (Figure 5B) of our proposed immunoelectrode were recorded for ca. 30 d (10 d intervals) to study its storage stability. During the 30 days, no apparent current variation was observed; afterwards, the current showed a 4% variation from the original value. These results indicated a remarkable storage stability of our proposed electrode, for as long as 30 d.
For the investigation of the practical performance, three serum samples were analyzed in both the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Cusabio) method and the proposed electrochemical immunosensor. ELISA is a recommended technology, commercially used for the ProGRP test. An antibody specific to ProGRP was first coated on the microplate. Then, samples were added to the microplate with a biotin-conjugated antibody. The antigen was combined with the antibodies in the microplate by a competitive binding test. Next, avidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) were added, and formed a color change. The result was measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 450 nm. For a comparison test, the standard addition method was used. The results are summarized in Table 1. As shown in the table, the ELISA could not detect ProGRP above 2 ng/mL, while the proposed immunosensor showed excellent performance at high-concentration conditions.

3. Experiments

3.1. Chemicals

ProGRP and anti-ProGRP were commercially available in Shengyuan Biotech Inc., Shenzhen, China. All test reagents were of analytical grade. For all experiments, the supporting electrolyte was a pH 7 KH2PO4 buffer solution (PBS), where 1 M NaOH was added to adjust the pH value. The following were purchased from XFNANO Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China): Acetic acid; commercial AuNPs; CS monomer, for the preparation of TiO2NPs, Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4; absolute ethanol, for synthetic serum preparation of NaCl; CaCl2; N-Ethyl-N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC); N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS); KCl; urea, which was commercially available in Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China); and Au nanoparticles with an average size of 20 nm (0.05 mg/mL).

3.2. Nanocomposite Preparation

For the preparation of the TiO2/(CS+Au)-modified CPE, first TiO2 (20 %), mineral oil (30 %), and graphite powder (50 %) were mixed together to prepare TiO2/CPE. The yielded paste was filled into the hole of a Teflon body (radius: 2 mm), and the electrical contact for this CPE was a copper wire. The CS flakes were dissolved into an acetic acid solution (50 mL, 2 M) which was added with the commercial AuNPs (2 µL) and was stirred for 60 min. This was followed by a 15 min sonication, so as to uniformly disperse the AuNPs into the CS. Subsequently the CS/AuNPs solution (25 µL) was uniformly spread onto the TiO2/CPE. After drying in a desiccator for 45 min, the TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/CPE was yielded.

3.3. Immunosensor Fabrication

The immunosensor was prepared by firstly immersing TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/CPE into the anti-ProGRP solution for 60 min at 4 °C. The unspecific bindings were prevented through blocking the remaining active sides on the CPE surface with 0.25 % (w/w) BSA for 20 min. This was followed by washing the electrode surface using distilled water. The TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/CPE immunosensor was stored at 4 °C in pH 7 phosphate buffer solution (PBS), prior to use.

3.4. Measurement

The electrochemical experiment was carried out with an Autolab Potentiostat/Galvanostat (PGSTAT302/N, Metrohm), where a three-electrode configuration was used. The references and the auxiliary electrode were Ag/AgCl and a platinum wire, respectively. The EIS characterization was performed using a multi-impedance test system with a frequency range of 10 kHz–10 mHz and an AC amplitude of 10 mV.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, ProGRP was successfully detected through the interactions between antibodies and antigens using a CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs) nanohybrid-based immunosensor. The electrochemical response for the CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode, as a function of the ProGRP concentration, indicated that this electrode was highly sensitive, displayed long-term stability, and possessed a low detection limit. Therefore, the proposed immunosensor could be potentially used in the medical diagnostic field.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Z.W., X.C., J.Z.; Funding acquisition, J.X., L.X.; Investigation, Z.W.; Methodology, J.F.; Project administration, J.X., L.X.; Writing-original draft, Z.W.

Funding

This research work was financially supported by Henan Postdoctoral Foundation (No. 2018ZYZD14), and the scientific and technological project of Henan Province in China (No. 182102311160), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M642760).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cai, X.; Weng, S.; Guo, R.; Lin, L.; Chen, W.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, Z.; Lin, X. Ratiometric Electrochemical Immunoassay Based on Internal Reference Value for Reproducible and Sensitive Detection of Tumor Marker. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 81, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J.; Ge, S.; Song, X. All-Graphene Composite Materials for Signal Amplification toward Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Immunosensing of Tumor Marker. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 71, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shamsipur, M.; Farzin, L.; Tabrizi, M.A.; Molaabasi, F. Highly Sensitive Label Free Electrochemical Detection of Vgef 165 Tumor Marker Based on “Signal Off” and “Signal on” Strategies Using an Anti-Vegf 165 Aptamer Immobilized Bsa-Gold Nanoclusters/Ionic Liquid/Glassy Carbon Electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhong, Z.; Peng, N.; Qing, Y.; Shan, J.; Li, M.; Guan, W.; Dai, N.; Gu, X.; Wang, D. An Electrochemical Immunosensor for Simultaneous Multiplexed Detection of Neuron-Specific Enolase and Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Using Liposomes as Enhancer. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 5624–5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhuo, Y.; Chai, Y.; Yuan, R.; Mao, L.; Yuan, Y.; Han, J. Glucose Oxidase and Ferrocene Labels Immobilized at Au/TiO2 Nanocomposites with High Load Amount and Activity for Sensitive Immunoelectrochemical Measurement of Progrp Biomarker. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3838–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fu, L.; Wang, A.; Lai, G.; Lin, C.; Yu, J.; Yu, A.; Liu, Z.; Xie, K.; Su, W. A Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with N-Doped Carbon Dots for Improved Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide and Paracetamol. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jia, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, N.; Ma, Z. A Label-Free Immunosensor Based on Graphene Nanocomposites for Simultaneous Multiplexed Electrochemical Determination of Tumor Markers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 53, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ma, F.; Ho, C.; Cheng, A.; Yu, H. Immobilization of Redox-Labeled Hairpin DNA Aptamers on Gold: Electrochemical Quantitation of Epithelial Tumor Marker Mucin 1. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 110, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Z.; Liu, N. Design of Immunoprobes for Electrochemical Multiplexed Tumor Marker Detection. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2015, 15, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Conteduca, V.; Burgio, S.; Menna, C.; Carretta, E.; Rossi, L.; Bianchi, E.; Masini, C.; Amadori, D.; Giorgi, U. Chromogranin a Is a Potential Prognostic Marker in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Enzalutamide. Prostate 2014, 74, 1691–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dayyani, F.; Morgenstern, D.; Holdenrieder, S. In Response to “Serum Tumor Marker Use in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors”. J. Oncol. Pract. 2016, 12, 273–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zeng, J.; Yin, P.; Tan, Y.; Dong, L.; Hu, C.; Huang, Q.; Lu, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, G. Metabolomics Study of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Discovery and Validation of Serum Potential Biomarkers by Using Capillary Electrophoresis–Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 3420–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, H.; Mei, Q.; Jia, S.; Koh, K.; Wang, K.; Liu, X. High Specific Detection of Osteopontin Using a Three-Dimensional Copolymer Layer Support Based on Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Analyst 2014, 139, 4476–4481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Ye, X.; Wu, T.; Deng, H.; Wu, P.; Li, C. Sensing Platform for Neuron Specific Enolase Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymerized Ionic Liquids in between Gold Nanoarrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jo, H.; Gu, H.; Jeon, W.; Youn, H.; Her, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Shin, J.; Ban, C. Electrochemical Aptasensor of Cardiac Troponin I for the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 9869–9875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cho, J.; Sung, H. Proteomic Approaches in Lung Cancer Biomarker Development. Expert Rev. Proteomic. 2009, 6, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Palmblad, M.; Tiss, A.; Cramer, R. Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Proteomics–from the Present to the Future. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wei, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, A.; Wang, Y.; Cai, X. Electrochemical Detecting Lung Cancer-Associated Antigen Based on Graphene-Gold Nanocomposite. Molecules 2017, 22, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Anik, Ü.; Timur, S. Towards the Electrochemical Diagnosis of Cancer: Nanomaterial-Based Immunosensors and Cytosensors. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 111831–111841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fengjin, Q.; Hou, X.; Ma, X. Research Progress in the Sensor Application of Ferrocene and Its Derivatives. Chin. J. Appl. Chem. 2013, 30, 1393–1398. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiani, M.; Tehrani, A.; Sayahi, H. Reusable and Robust High Sensitive Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensor Based on Ni (Oh) 2 Nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 839, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stefan-van Staden, R.I.; Comnea, I.R.; van Staden, J.F.; Gavan, C.S. Stochastic Microsensors as Screening Tools for Neuron Specific Enolase. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 26383–26388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Su, H.; Zhang, Y. Horseradish Peroxidase-Loaded Nanospheres Attached to Hollow Gold Nanoparticles as Signal Enhancers in an Ultrasensitive Immunoassay for Alpha-Fetoprotein. Microchim. Acta 2014, 181, 679–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yuan, Q.; Wu, S.; Ye, C.; Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Cui, N.; Guo, P.; Lai, G.; Wei, Q.; Yang, M.; et al. Sensitivity Enhancement of Potassium Ion (K+) Detection Based on Graphene Field-Effect Transistors with Surface Plasma Pretreatment. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 285, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, H.; Zhuang, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, A.; Su, W.; Yu, Y.; Lin, C. Enhanced Electrochemical Voltammetric Fingerprints for Plant Taxonomic Sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 120, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fu, L.; Xiao, X.; Wang, A. Reduced Graphene Oxide Coupled with G-C3n4 Nanodots as 2d/0d Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 122, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ye, C.; Sun, H.; Dai, D.; Wei, Q.; Lai, G.; Wu, T.; Yu, A.; Fu, L.; et al. Highly Stable and Regenerative Graphene–Diamond Hybrid Electrochemical Biosensor for Fouling Target Dopamine Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 111, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Takahashi, S.; Anzai, J. Recent Progress in Ferrocene-Modified Thin Films and Nanoparticles for Biosensors. Materials 2013, 6, 5742–5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z. A Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensor Based on Cuo Nanoparticles Decorated Carbon Spheres. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 211, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saravanan, R.; Khan, M.; Gupta, V.; Mosquera, E.; Gracia, F.; Narayanan, V.; Stephen, A. Zno/Ag/Mn2O3 Nanocomposite for Visible Light-Induced Industrial Textile Effluent Degradation, Uric Acid and Ascorbic Acid Sensing and Antimicrobial Activity. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 34645–34651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mathur, S.; Erdem, A.; Cavelius, C.; Barth, S.; Altmayer, J. Amplified Electrochemical DNA-Sensing of Nanostructured Metal Oxide Films Deposited on Disposable Graphite Electrodes Functionalized by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 136, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lucarelli, L.; Nadtochenko, V.; Kiwi, J. Environmental Photochemistry: Quantitative Adsorption and Ftir Studies During the Tio2-Photocatalyzed Degradation of Orange Ii. Langmuir 2000, 16, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kavan, L.; Rathouský, J.; Grätzel, M.; Shklover, V.; Zukal, A. Surfactant-Templated Tio2 (Anatase): Characteristic Features of Lithium Insertion Electrochemistry in Organized Nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 12012–12020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Su, W. Embedding Leaf Tissue in Graphene Ink to Improve Signals in Electrochemistry-Based Chemotaxonomy. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 92, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, L.; Wang, A.; Lyu, F.; Lai, G.; Yu, J.; Lin, C.; Liu, Z.; Yu, A.; Su, W. A Solid-State Electrochemical Sensing Platform Based on a Supramolecular Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 262, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zeng, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhou, N.; Liu, L.; Song, X. Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 (He4) May Be a Better Tumor Marker in Early Lung Cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 455, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Huang, Z.; Xu, D.; Zhang, F.; Ying, Y.; Song, L. Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide and Neuron-Specific Enolase: Useful Predictors of Response to Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2016, 18, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, L.; Wang, A.; Lai, G.; Su, W.; Malherbe, F.; Yu, J.; Lin, C.; Yu, A. Defects Regulating of Graphene Ink for Electrochemical Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Uric Acid. Talanta 2018, 180, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. The cyclic voltammetry (CVs) of different electrodes: carbon paste electrode (CPE)/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs), CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP.
Figure 1. The cyclic voltammetry (CVs) of different electrodes: carbon paste electrode (CPE)/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs), CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP.
Molecules 24 00656 g001
Figure 2. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization recorded for different electrodes: CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs), CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP and CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP.
Figure 2. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization recorded for different electrodes: CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs), CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP and CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP.
Molecules 24 00656 g002
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the construction of proposed electrochemical immunosensor.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the construction of proposed electrochemical immunosensor.
Molecules 24 00656 sch001
Figure 3. Electrochemical impedance response recorded for CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode as a function of ProGRP concentration over the range of 10 to 450 ng/mL.
Figure 3. Electrochemical impedance response recorded for CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode as a function of ProGRP concentration over the range of 10 to 450 ng/mL.
Molecules 24 00656 g003
Figure 4. Interfering effects of uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA) and glucose (Glu) on the performance of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP, with the histogram plot with these interference agents shown in the inset.
Figure 4. Interfering effects of uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA) and glucose (Glu) on the performance of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP, with the histogram plot with these interference agents shown in the inset.
Molecules 24 00656 g004
Figure 5. (A) Reproducibility study of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode in the presence of ProGRP (300 ng/mL). (B) The stability curve of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode in the presence of ProGRP (300 ng/mL) in a period of 0–30 days.
Figure 5. (A) Reproducibility study of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode in the presence of ProGRP (300 ng/mL). (B) The stability curve of CPE/TiO2/(CS+AuNPs)/anti-ProGRP/BSA/ProGRP immunoelectrode in the presence of ProGRP (300 ng/mL) in a period of 0–30 days.
Molecules 24 00656 g005
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical immunosensor and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) method for the determination of ProGRP in serum samples.
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical immunosensor and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) method for the determination of ProGRP in serum samples.
SampleAdditionELISAProposed Sensor
11 ng/mL0.97 ng/mL0.98 ng/mL
22 ng/mL1.72 ng/mL1.94 ng/mL
35 ng/mLOut of detection range4.88 ng/mL

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, Z.; Cai, X.; Zhang, J.; Fan, J.; Xu, J.; Xu, L. High Sensitive Immunoelectrochemical Measurement of Lung Cancer Tumor Marker ProGRP Based on TiO2-Au Nanocomposite. Molecules 2019, 24, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040656

AMA Style

Wei Z, Cai X, Zhang J, Fan J, Xu J, Xu L. High Sensitive Immunoelectrochemical Measurement of Lung Cancer Tumor Marker ProGRP Based on TiO2-Au Nanocomposite. Molecules. 2019; 24(4):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Zheng, Xiaoping Cai, Junping Zhang, Junming Fan, Jiangyan Xu, and Liran Xu. 2019. "High Sensitive Immunoelectrochemical Measurement of Lung Cancer Tumor Marker ProGRP Based on TiO2-Au Nanocomposite" Molecules 24, no. 4: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040656

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop