Next Article in Journal
Photocatalytic Difluoromethylation Reactions of Aromatic Compounds and Aliphatic Multiple C–C Bonds
Previous Article in Journal
Solvent-Free Process for the Development of Photocatalytic Membranes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules24244482
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Site-Directed Spin Labeling of RNA with a Gem-Diethylisoindoline Spin Label: PELDOR, Relaxation, and Reduction Stability

by
Christine Wuebben
1,
Simon Blume
1,
Dinar Abdullin
1,
Dominik Brajtenbach
1,
Florian Haege
1,
Stephanie Kath-Schorr
2 and
Olav Schiemann
1,*
1
Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Wegelerstraße 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
2
Life & Medical Sciences Institute Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry Unit, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 1, 53121 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(24), 4482; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244482
Submission received: 19 November 2019 / Revised: 2 December 2019 / Accepted: 4 December 2019 / Published: 6 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ribonucleic acid function is governed by its structure, dynamics, and interaction with other biomolecules and influenced by the local environment. Thus, methods are needed that enable one to study RNA under conditions as natural as possible, possibly within cells. Site-directed spin-labeling of RNA with nitroxides in combination with, for example, pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR or DEER) spectroscopy has been shown to provide such information. However, for in-cell measurements, the usually used gem-dimethyl nitroxides are less suited, because they are quickly reduced under in-cell conditions. In contrast, gem-diethyl nitroxides turned out to be more stable, but labeling protocols for binding these to RNA have been sparsely reported. Therefore, we describe here the bioconjugation of an azide functionalized gem-diethyl isoindoline nitroxide to RNA using a copper (I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (“click”-chemistry). The labeling protocol provides high yields and site selectivity. The analysis of the orientation selective PELDOR data show that the gem-diethyl and gem-dimethyl labels adopt similar conformations. Interestingly, in deuterated buffer, both labels attached to RNA yield TM relaxation times that are considerably longer than observed for the same type of label attached to proteins, enabling PELDOR time windows of up to 20 microseconds. Together with the increased stability in reducing environments, this label is very promising for in-cell Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) studies.

1. Introduction

Ribonucleic acid function is usually associated with the translation of the genetic code into proteins involving mRNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs. However, over the last decades, it was found that RNA fulfills many more roles. For example, snRNAs (small nuclear RNA) function in a variety of nuclear processes including the splicing of pre-mRNA [1]; snoRNAs (small nucleolar RNA) process and chemically modify rRNA [2]; ribozymes are catalytically active RNAs [3]; and riboswitches [4] play an important role in the regulation of genes. In order to understand how RNA is able to perform this wide range of functions, insight into its three-dimensional fold, its conformational dynamics, and complex formation with other biomolecules is required. Through the years, a toolbox of biophysical methods by which such insights can be obtained has been assembled. These methods include X-ray crystallography [5,6], cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) [7,8], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) [9,10], electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [11,12], Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) [13,14], small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) [15], and molecular dynamics simulation (MD) [16]. Out of this toolbox, EPR is a method that provides such information but requires the presence of unpaired electrons. Since RNA is intrinsically diamagnetic, the spin centers have to be introduced, for example, by means of a diamagnetic for paramagnetic metal ion exchange (e.g., Mg(II) for Mn(II) [17,18]) or by site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) with nitroxides [19,20], trityl radicals [21,22,23] or metal complexes based on, for example, gadolinium [24,25]. Over the years, various methods have been established to attach these labels site specifically to the sugar [26,27], phosphate [28,29,30] or base moiety of RNA [31,32,33,34,35,36]. The conjugation can be performed either during the oligonucleotide synthesis or through post-synthetic labeling of pre-functionalized sites of the oligonucleotide. If two or more spin centers are present, EPR-based pulsed dipolar spectroscopy (PDS) offers a means to measure the distance between these centers up to 16 nm [37] and thereby gain structural and dynamics information. Out of the PDS methods, pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR or DEER, Figure 1) in combination with nitroxide spin labeling has been particularly successful in determining biomolecular structures in solutions to monitor their conformational changes and to access their internal dynamics [38,39]. However, in order to apply SDSL/PELDOR within cells, the spin labels have to survive reduction in cell conditions. In this regard, the usually used gem-dimethyl nitroxides have the disadvantage of being reduced within minutes. In contrast, gem-diethyl nitroxide or nitroxides with sterically even more demanding groups in the gem-position reveal increased redox stability [27,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Yet, protocols for spin-labeling DNA [47] or RNA [27] with gem-diethyl isoindoline nitroxides have been reported only rarely. Previously, we reported on the bioconjugation of the gem-dimethyl nitroxide 1• (Figure 1b) to RNA using “click”-chemistry in solution [48].
Here, this protocol was extended to the azide functionalized gem-diethylisoindoline spin label 2• and its stability under reducing conditions, its relaxation behavior and performance in PELDOR measurements were tested.

2. Results and Discussion

Previously, we showed that the gem-dimethylisoindoline label 1• can be attached to RNA strands in solution employing the CuAAC “click”-reaction (Figure 2a) [48]. Here, this protocol was extended to the gem-diethylisoindoline analogue 2• (see Supplementary Materials for synthesis), using the same self-complementary RNA strand (Figure 2b) as for 1• [34]. The reaction was carried out by first preparing the catalytic copper (I) solution and then incubating it with the alkyne-modified RNA and the spin label at 60 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, the labelled RNA was purified by means of HPLC. The yield of labelled RNA was 50% with respect to starting RNA. Incorporation of the label as well as the purity of the sample was confirmed by LC-MS (Figure 3a–c). The liquid state cw X-band EPR spectrum of B2 is depicted in Figure 3d and shows the typical line-shape of immobilized nitroxides, very similar to the spectrum of A2 [34]. Spin counting revealed that all purified RNA strands were quantitatively labelled (Table S1). The same protocol also works for DNA as shown in Supplementary Materials Section S6.2.
Since every modification of RNA potentially may result in structural changes, the influence of the spin label on the duplex structure was evaluated using UV-Vis-based melting studies (Figure 3e) and Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy (Figure 3f). For B2, a decrease in the melting temperature Tm of 5.5 °C per spin label was found which is in the usual range [31] and similar to the decrease of 4 °C found previously for A2 [34]. Also, the CD spectra showed only minor changes in the amplitudes confirming the prevalence of the standard A-form of the duplex. Thus, the influence of 2• on the RNA duplex structure was judged as being minor and relating only to local structural perturbations.

2.1. Two-Pulse Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) Measurements

The phase memory time, TM, of the spin label attached to the biomolecule is interesting for PELDOR measurements, because it determines the length of the PELDOR time trace and, thus, the distance length as well as the accuracy that can be accessed. Therefore, two-pulse ESEEM time traces were recorded at the Q-band for both RNAs, A2 and B2, in deuterated phosphate buffer (145 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0 in D2O, 20% d6-ethyleneglycol) (Figure 4a). The echo-decays were fitted according to a stretched, biexponential decay:
Y 2 τ =   Y 0 × exp ( − 2 τ / T M 1 ) x 1 + 1 − Y 0 × e x p ( − 2 τ / T M 2 ) x 2
Here, Y (2τ) is the intensity of the echo as a function of the time between the two pulses τ. Y0 is the echo intensity extrapolated to time zero. TM1 and TM2 are the phase memory times, and x1 and x2 are the corresponding stretched parameters, respectively. This expression contains 2 τ in the exponent, since the relaxation process is effective during both periods of τ of the Hahn-echo sequence. A stretched bi-exponential decay was chosen according to the literature [49] and because it yielded the best fit (Figure S3). In the literature, the stretch parameters vary between x = 1, if the relaxation process is dominated by instantaneous spin diffusion, and x = 2 in the case of nuclei spin diffusion [50]. Often, as here, the relaxation is a function of both. Fitting the time traces yielded the parameters in Table 1 and indicates very similar transversal relaxation behavior for A2 and B2. In both cases, the TM relaxation was dominated by a component with a time constant T M 1 of ~21 µs and a stretched exponent x 1 of ~2, while the minor component was much faster with T M 2 of ~1 µs and x 2 of ~1. Interestingly, the time constant of the dominating component decreased significantly to T M 1 of ~13 µs upon adding 17% H2O, while the minor component did not change (Figure 4c). This indicates that TM1 was dominated by nuclear spin diffusion [50]. That TM increased upon matrix deuteration was reported before [51,52], but labeling proteins with gem-diethylisoindoline or other nitroxides did not yield such long TM times. To our knowledge, such long TM times were only obtained if not only the solvent but also the biomolecule itself was deuterated [37,53,54]. For example, Ward et al. found similar TM values if the protein in the critical range of 7–25 Å from the spin center was deuterated [53,54,55,56]. Here, the length of label 2• placed the spin center at a minimum distance of 7–10 Å to the backbone of the RNA (Figure S7), and, in the case of oligonucleotides, many hydrogens are easily exchangeable by just diluting them in D2O which strongly increases the fraction of deuterium in the critical distance range. That this effect has not been reported previously for nitroxide-labeled oligonucleotides might be due to the particular length of the label and the thorough deuteration conditions used here.
In addition, the FFT-transformed ESEEM spectra showed a dipolar coupling frequency at 0.50 and 0.48 MHz for A2 and B2, respectively (Figure 4b) which translate into distances of 4.7 and 4.8 nm, respectively. These distances are in good agreement with the PELDOR data (see below). The observation of dipolar coupling frequencies in two-pulse ESEEM spectra is rare but has been reported before by Ward et al. [53,54] and Kulik et al. [57].

2.2. PELDOR Measurements

Previously, it was shown that spin label 1• gives rise to orientation selection in PELDOR experiments [34] which is also seen here for B2, indicating the rigidity of the label at low temperatures [34]. Therefore, the analysis of the PELDOR data was performed with the program PeldorFit [58], taking orientation selectivity in account (see Supplementary Materials Section S5). The best fit to the time traces as well as the error plots for the distance and angular parameters are shown in Figure 5. The best values for each fitting parameter are collected in Table 2 and compared to the data of A2. The geometric parameters for A2 and B2 are very similar and are best defined for the distance r and the angles ξ and β (for definition see Figure S6). This indicates that, at least for duplex structures, the exchange methyl for ethyl in the gem-position does not induce more structural perturbations. This is also supported by the UV-Vis and CD study described above.
Based on the knowledge of the extended TM, it was also tested how long the PELDOR time window can be made while still achieving an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio within a measurement time of 24 h. Figure 6a shows that good data can be obtained up to 20 µs. Thus, distances up to 10 nm are achievable [56].
Finally, the stability of 2• was accessed in two reducing media and compared to the gem-dimethyl analogue MTSL (Figure 6b). Due to the solubility of 2•, it was attached to a DNA strand (see Supplementary Materials Section S6). It can be seen that MTSL decays rapidly within minutes in ascorbate, whereas 2• is considerably more stable, prevailing for hours in the same medium. 2• is also much more stable than 1• in HeLa cell lysate, decaying only to 60% within 21 h.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures RNA

3.1.1. RNA Sequence

The RNA with the sequence 5′ CAU CUG AUA UCA GAX G 3′ (X = U for non-modified RNA, X = 5-ethynyl-2′-dU for modified RNA) was purchased from metabion.

3.1.2. Spin Labeling

First, 8 µL of a 250 mM solution of tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolylmethyl)amine (THPTA, Sigma–Aldrich) in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Carl Roth) were mixed with 8 µL of a fresh 50 mM solution of copper-I-iodide (Carl Roth) in DMSO. Then, 20 µL of DMSO were added and the mixture was incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Meanwhile, 2.5 nmol of the dried oligonucleotide with a 5-ethynyl-modified uridine at the desired position in the sequence was resuspended in 4.4 µL diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC, Carl Roth) treated water. Then, 3.6 µL of the catalytic solution and 2 µL of 100 mM spin label solution in DMSO were added to the RNA solution. The reaction mixture was mixed well and incubated for 30 min at 60 °C and 300 rpm (Thermomixer comfort, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The reaction was quenched via adding 480 µL Milli-Q water and desalted via an Amicon© ultra 3K column (Merck). Afterwards, the RNA was purified through reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC System (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in combination with a Zorbax 300SB-C18 (4.6 mm × 150 mm) column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). As the eluent was a 0.1 M aqueous solution of triethylammonium acetate (VWR Applichem), an increasing percentage of acetonitrile (VWR Chemicals) (8% to 20% over 20 min) was used. The fractions were desalted with Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL Centrifugal Filters (3K Device, Merck). Then, the RNA was either stored in Milli-Q water or rebuffered by washing the filter three times with 500 µL deuterated phosphate buffer (see Section 3.1.3.).

3.1.3. EPR Sample Preparation

The RNA was annealed in phosphate buffer (145 mM sodium chloride (Carl Roth), 10 mM sodium phosphate (Acros Organics), pH 7.0) by heating to 70 °C for 1 min and then cooling to 5 °C with a rate of 1 °C/min. For the pulsed EPR measurements, the HPLC-purified RNA sample was rebuffered (see Section 3.1.2.) in deuterated phosphate buffer (D2O, Deutero) to yield RNA concentrations of 35 µM. Before freezing in liquid nitrogen, 20% d6-ethylene glycol was added (Sigma–Aldrich).

3.2. Chromatography

3.2.1. HPLC

For the analysis of 2•, Milli-Q water (Merck Millipore) was used with a gradient of 50% → 100% acetonitrile (Carl Roth) in 20 min on a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 (4.6, 150 mm) column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC System (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3.2.2. LCMS

For the analysis of the oligonucleotide, 10 mM trimethylamine (Fisher)/100 mM hexafluoroisoproanol (Fluka) was used with a gradient of 3% → 20% acetonitrile (VWR Chemicals) on a Zorbax Narrow Bore SB C18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 5 µm) column (Agilent Technology) in combination with an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC System (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and HTC esquire (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany).

3.3. Spectroscopy

3.3.1. IR

The IR measurements were obtained from a Nicolet 5700 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) FTIR spectrometer using a thin film of 150 µm of a 111 nM solution of 2• in chloroform.

3.3.2. CD

The CD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature with a scanning speed of 100 nm/min. To obtain a spectral range of 200–320 nm, a data pitch of 0.1 nm was adjusted. Ten scans were accumulated. The measurement was performed on 10 μM RNA samples.

3.3.3. UV

The UV melting curves were recorded on a Cary 100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 260 nm. The temperature of the sample was increased with a heating rate of 1 °C/min from 20 °C to 80 °C. The measurements were performed on 1 µM samples.

3.4. EPR

3.4.1. cw EPR

The room temperature cw EPR spectrum of the 35 µM A2 and B2 were recorded at X-band frequencies on a Bruker EMXnano spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) with a microwave power of 10 mW, a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, a modulation amplitude of 1.0 G, a microwave frequency of 9.641 GHz, and 1300 points in the field interval 337.9–350.9 mT.

3.4.2. Pulsed EPR

The pulsed EPR measurements were conducted at Q-band frequencies on a Bruker ELEXSYS 580 EPR spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with an ER 5106QT-II resonator and a 150 W TWT-amplifier (Applied System Engineering, Fort Worth, TX, USA). The temperature was adjusted to the appropriate value using a CF935 helium gas-flow cryostat (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) in conjugation with an Oxford Instruments ITC 502 temperature controller.
The ESEEM spectra were recorded using a standard two-pulse Hahn echo sequence with pulse lengths of 12 ns and 24 ns for the π and π/2 pulses, respectively, an initial τ of 200 ns, and with increments of τ of 8 ns.
The PELDOR experiments were performed at Q-band with the standard four-pulse sequence. The frequency of the pumping pulse was set at the maximum intensity of the nitroxide signal. The offset between pump and detection frequencies was varied as depicted in Figure S5 and Table S3. π/2 and π pulses lengths of 12 ns and 24 ns were used. For the π/2 pulse, a two-step phase cycle was executed. The pump pulse length was set to 12 ns. The initial τ was set to 260 ns (d1). Deuterium modulation was suppressed by addition of 8 time traces with an increment of 16 ns for τ. The detection window with a width of 40 ns was set to the maximum of the echo. The PELDOR signal was recorded with a shot repetition time of 3 ms. To achieve an acceptable SNR, the signal was averaged for 4 to 24 h, depending on the position of the detection pulses.

3.5. Stability Measurements

3.5.1. Sample Preparation for Measurements with Ascorbic Acid

A 5 mM solution of L-ascorbic acid (Sigma–Aldrich) was prepared in PBS solution. Next, 1 µL spin label stock solution (4 mM) was mixed with 19 µL l-ascorbic acid solution at the time t0. The sample solution (200 µM spin label, 4.75 mM l-ascorbate) was drawn into a 10 µL capillary and sealed on both ends with Korasilon-Paste (Kurt Obermeier GmbH & Co., KG). The capillary was inserted into a capped Q-band tube.

3.5.2. HeLa Cell Lysis Preparation

The HeLa cell pellet (2.13 × 108 HeLa S3 cells, ATCC# CCL-2.2) was thawed on ice and resuspended in 2.13 mL PBS solution. The suspension was frozen in a dry ice/ethanol bath (−72 °C) for 5 min and then thawed in a warm water bath (37 °C) for 5 min. This cycle of freezing and thawing was repeated twice for a total of three circulations. Next, the suspension was rigorously mixed by vortexen and centrifuged at 15,000 rotations per minute (4 °C). The supernatant was collected and separated into aliquots with a volume of 19 µL each. The aliquots were shock frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

3.5.3. Sample Preparation for Measurements in HeLa Lysate

One aliquot of HeLa lysate was thawed on ice. Next, 1 µL spin label stock solution (4 mM) was mixed with 19 µL lysate at the time t0. The sample solution (200 µM spin label) was drawn into a 10 µL capillary and sealed on both ends with Korasilon-Paste (Kurt Obermeier GmbH & Co., KG). The capillary was inserted into a capped Q-band tube.

3.5.4. EPR Stability Measurements

All EPR spectra were measured in the EMX microX (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) using a SHQ resonator. The apparatus was controlled with the Bruker software Xenon. Before each measurement, the spectrometer was allowed to heat up for at least one hour to assure optimal magnetic field stability.
The SHQ resonator was tuned to the sample and the Q-value was taken at a 33 dB attenuation. The measurement was started at the time tstart. The dead time was calculated as the difference between t0 and tstart. All samples were measured in a field-delay experiment for 21 h with one measurement slice every five minutes at a power attenuation of 15 dB and 30 points/G resolution. The experiments were done at room temperature with a modulation amplitude of 1 G. The tuning parameters—lock offset, diode current, microwave frequency, and receiver level—were observed using a home written shell program.

3.5.5. Data Analysis

The raw spectrum was displayed in the Bruker software Xenon (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) and baseline corrected using a ninth order polynomial. The double integrals were calculated with the same software. The data were analyzed using a home written MATLAB script.

4. Conclusions

Spin label 2• was easily conjugated to a 16 nucleotide long self-complementary RNA strand through “click”-chemistry. The influence of the label on the duplex structure was analyzed with CD spectroscopy and thermal denaturation experiments and judged as being local and comparable to the previously published data on the gem-dimethyl analogue 1•. This is also supported by the analysis of the PELDOR data, showing that both labels adopted very similar conformations on the duplex. Thus, the larger gem-diethyl substituents did not influence the alignment of spin label 2• in the RNA structure. Interestingly, the RNA duplex with spin labels 1• or 2• revealed a prolonged TM relaxation time that was not reported for similar isoindoline spin-labeled proteins [46], making longer distance measurements up to 10 nm feasible. Finally, spin label 2• had a considerably improved reduction stability against ascorbate and HeLa cell lysate as compared to MTSL. Therefore, 2• appears to be a promising candidate for long-range distance measurements on oligonucleotides within cells.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Materials are available online. It contains additional figures, spectra and details of the experiments and methods [47,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].

Author Contributions

C.W. performed the labeling, the spectroscopic measurements, the data analysis and the writing of the first draft as well as the review and editing. S.B. synthesized 2• and was involved in the sample preparation. D.A. was involved in the PeldorFit analysis. D.B. synthesized 1•. F.H. performed the stability measurements of the labels under reducing conditions. S.K.-S. was involved in data analysis and editing the manuscript. O.S. designed the research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

Funding by the DFG via SPP1601 is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Karijolich, J.; Yu, Y.-T. Spliceosomal snRNA modifications and their function. RNA Biol. 2010, 7, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Morgan, D.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walter, P. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 6th ed.; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-0-8153-4432-2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lilley, D.M.J.; Eckstein, F. Ribozymes and RNA Catalysis; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-0-85404-253-1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Breaker, R.R. Riboswitches and Translational Control. CSH Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reyes, F.E.; Garst, A.D.; Batey, R.T. Strategies in RNA Crystallography. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; Chapter 6; pp. 119–139. ISBN 978-0-12-380922-3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zheng, L.; Falschlunger, C.; Huang, K.; Mairhofer, E.; Yuan, S.; Wang, J.; Patel, D.J.; Micura, R.; Rem, A. Hatchet ribozyme structure and implications for cleavage mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 10783–10791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Herbert, H. CryoEM: A crystals to single particles round-trip. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019, 58, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaledhonkar, S.; Fu, Z.; Caban, K.; Li, W.; Chen, B.; Sun, M.; Gonzalez, R.L., Jr.; Frank, J. Late steps in bacterial translation initiation vizualized using time-resolved cryo-EM. Nature 2019, 570, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thompson, R.D.; Baisden, J.T.; Zhang, Q. NMR Characterization of RNA Small Molecule Interactions. Methods 2019, 167, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia-Lopez, A.; Tessaro, F.; Jonker, H.R.A.; Wacker, A.; Richter, C.; Comte, A.; Berntenis, N.; Schmucki, R.; Hatje, K.; Petermann, O.; et al. Targeting RNA structure in SMN2 reverses spinal muscular atrophy molecular phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goldfarb, D.; Stoll, S. EPR Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Methods; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-119-16299-5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hetzke, T.; Vogel, M.; Gophane, D.B.; Weigand, J.E.; Suess, B.; Sigurdsson, S.T.; Prisner, T.F. Influence of Mg2+ on the conformational flexibility of a tetracycline aptamer. RNA 2018, 25, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lerner, E.; Corder, T.; Ingargiola, A.; Alhadid, Y.; Chung, S.Y.; Michalet, X.; Weiss, S. Toward dynamic structural biology: Two decades of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. Science 2018, 359, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Andreo, A.Z.; Harm, U.; Klostermeier, D. Single-stranded regions modulate conformational dynamics and ATPase activity of elF4A to optimize 5′-UTR unwinding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 5260–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Y.; Pollack, L. SAXS Studies of RNA: Structures, dynamics, and interactions with partners. WIRES RNA 2016, 7, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Šponer, J.; Bussi, G.; Krepl, M.; Banáš, P.; Bottaro, S.; Cunha, R.A.; Gil-Ley, A.; Pinamonti, G.; Poblete, S.; Jurečka, P.; et al. RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4177–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hunsicker-Wang, L.; Vogt, M.; DeRose, V.J. EPR Methods to Study Specific Metal-Ion Binding Sites in RNA. Meth. Enzymol. 2009, 468, 335–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kisseleva, N.; Kraut, S.; Jäschke, A.; Schiemann, O. Characterizing multiple metal ion binding sites within a ribozyme by cadmium induced EPR silencing. HFSP J. 2007, 1, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shelke, S.A.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Structural Information from Spin-Labels and Intrinsic Paramagnetic Centres in the Biosciences. Structure and Bonding; Timmel, C., Harmer, C., Anderson, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 152, pp. 121–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haugland, M.M.; Lovett, J.E.; Anderson, E.A. Advances in the synthesis of nitroxide radicals for use in biomolecule spin labelling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Shevelev, G.Y.; Krumkacheva, O.A.; Lomzov, A.A.; Kuzhelev, A.A.; Rogozhinkova, O.Y.; Trukhin, D.V.; Troitykaya, T.I.; Tormyshev, V.M.; Fedin, M.V.; Pyshnyi, D.V.; et al. Physiological-Temperature Distance Measurement in Nucleic Acid using Triarylmethyl-Based Spin Labels and Pulsed Dipolar EPR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 134, 9874–9877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; Borbat, P.; Zweier, J.L.; Freed, J.H.; Hubbell, W.L. Pulsed ESR Dipolar Spectroscopy for Distance Measurements in Immobilized Spin Labeled Proteins in Liquid Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9950–9952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Reginsson, G.W.; Kunjir, N.C.; Sigurdsson, S.T.; Schiemann, O. Trityl Radicals: Spin Labels for Nanometer-Distance Measurements. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 13580–13584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Goldfarb, D. Gd3+ spin labeling for distance measurements by pulse EPR spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 9685–9699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wojciechowski, F.; Groß, A.; Holder, I.T.; Knörr, L.; Drescher, M.; Hartig, J.S. Pulsed EPR spectroscopy distance measurements of DNA internally labelled with Gd3+-DOTA. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13850–13853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schiemann, O.; Weber, A.; Edwards, T.E.; Prisner, T.F.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Nanometer Distance Measurements on RNA Using PELDOR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saha, S.; Jagtap, A.P.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Site-directed spin labeling of 2′-amino groups in RNA with isoindoline nitroxides that are resistant to reduction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13142–13145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, P.Z.; Butcher, S.E.; Feigon, J.; Hubbell, W.L. Quantitative Analysis of the Isolated GAAA Tetraloop/Receptor Interaction in Solution: A Site-Directed Spin Labeling Study. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 6929–6936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nguyen, P.H.; Popova, A.M.; Hidgen, K.; Qin, P.Z. A nucleotide-independent cyclic nitroxide label for monitoring segmental motions in nucleic acids. BMC Biophys. 2015, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Esquiaqui, J.M.; Sherman, E.M.; Ionescu, S.A.; Ye, J.-D.; Fanucci, G.E. characterizating the Dynamics of the Leader-Linker Interaction in the Glycine Riboswitch with Site-Directed Spin Labeling. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 3526–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sicoli, G.; Wachowius, F.; Bennati, M.; Höbartner, C. Probing Secondary Structures of Spin-Labeled RNA by Pulsed EPR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6443–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Schiemann, K.; Piton, N.; Plackmeyer, J.; Bode, B.E.; Prisner, T.F.; Engels, J.W. Spin labeling of oligonucleotides with the nitroxide TPA and use of PELDOR, a pulse EPR method, to measure intramolecular distances. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 904–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Höbartner, C.; Sicoli, G.; Wachowius, F.; Gophane, D.B.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Synthesis and Characterization of RNA Containing a Rigid and Nonperturbing Cytidine-Derived Spin Label. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 7749–7754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kerzhner, M.; Abdullin, D.; Więcek, J.; Matsuoka, H.; Hagelueken, G.; Schiemann, O.; Famulok, M. Post-synthetic Spin Labeling of RNA through Click Chemistry for PELDOR Measurements. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12113–12121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weinreich, T.; Jaumann, E.A.; Scheffer, U.; Prisner, T.F.; Göbel, M.W. A Cytidine Phosporamidite with Protected nitroxide Spin Label: Synthesis of a Full-Length TAR RNA and Investigation by In-Line Probing and EPR Spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6202–6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Juliusson, H.Y.; Segler, A.-L.J.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Benzoyl-Protected Hydroxylamines for Improved Chemical Synthesis of Oligonucleotides Containing Nitroxides Spin Labels. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 23, 3799–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schmidt, T.; Wälti, M.A.; Baber, J.L.; Hustedt, E.J.; Clore, G.M. Long Distance Measurements up to 160 Å in the GroEL Tetradecamer Using Q-Band DEER EPR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15905–15909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kristić, I.; Endeward, B.; Margraf, D.; Marko, A.; Prisner, T.F. EPR Spectroscopy Applications in Chemistry and Biology; Klostermeier, D., Hamman, D., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 321, pp. 159–198. ISBN 978-3-642-28346-8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Schiemann, O. Mapping Global Folds in Oligonulceotides by Pulsed Electron-electron Double Resonance. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-12-380922-3. [Google Scholar]
  40. Marx, L.; Chiarelli, R.; Guiberteau, T.; Rassat, A. A comparative study of the reduction by ascorbate of 1,1,3,3-tetraethylisoindolin-2-yloxyl and of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylisoindolin-2-yloxyl. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2000, 1, 1181–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paletta, J.T.; Pink, M.; Foley, B.; Rajca, S.; Rajca, A. Synthesis and Reduction Kinetics of Sterically Shielded Pyrrolidine Nitroxides. Org. Lett. 2012, 16, 5298–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, Y.; Paletta, J.T.; Berg, K.; Reinhart, E.; Rajca, S.; Rajca, A. Synthesis of Unnatural Amino Acids Functionalized with sterically Shielded Pyrroline Nitroxides. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5298–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jagtap, A.P.; Krstic, I.; Kunjir, N.C.; Hänsel, R.; Prisner, T.F.; Sigurdsson, S.T. Sterically shielded spin labels for in-cell EPR spectroscopy: Analysis of stability in reducing environment. Free Radic. Res. 2015, 49, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Karthikeyan, G.; Bonucci, A.; Casano, G.; Gerbaud, G.; Abel, S.; Thomé, V.; Kodjabachian, L.; Magalon, A.; Guigliarelli, B.; Belle, V.; et al. A Bioresistant Nitroxide Spin Label for In-Cell EPR Spectroscopy: In Vitro and In Oocytes Protein Structural Dynamics Studies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1366–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bleicken, S.; Assafa, T.E.; Zhang, H.; Elsner, C.; Ritsch, I.; Pink, M.; Rajca, S.; Jeschke, G.; Rajca, A.; Bordignon, E. gem-Diethyl Pyrroline Nitroxide Spin Labels: Synthesis, EPR Characterization, Rotamer Libraries and Biocompatibility. Chemistryopen 2019, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Braun, T.S.; Widder, P.; Osswald, U.; Groß, L.; Williams, L.; Schmidt, M.; Helmle, I.; Summerer, D.; Drescher, M. Isoindoline-Base Nitroxides as Bioresistant Spin Labels for Protein Labeling via Cysteines and Alkyne Bearing Noncanonical Amino Acids. ChemBioChem 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Haugland, M.M.; El-Sagheer, A.H.; Porter, R.J.; Peña, J.; Brown, T.; Anderson, E.A.; Lovett, J.E. 2′-Alkynylnucleotides: A Sequence- and Spin Label-Flexible Strategy for EPR Spectroscopy in DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9069–9072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kerzhner, M.; Matsuoka, H.; Wuebben, C.; Famulok, M.; Schiemann, O. High-Yield Spin Labeling of Long RNAs for Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Biochemistry 2018, 57, 2923–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sproules, S. Molecules as electron spin qubits. In Electron Paramagnetic Resononance; Chechik, V., Murphy, D.M., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2017; Volume 25, ISBN 978-1-78262-857-6. [Google Scholar]
  50. Eaton, S.S.; Eaton, G.R. Distance Measurements in Biological Systems by EPR; Berliner, L.J., Eaton, G.R., Eaton, S.S., Eds.; Kluwer: New York, NY, USA, 2000; ISBN 0-306-47109-4. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindgren, M.; Eaton, G.R.; Eaton, S.S.; Jonsson, B.-H.; Hammarström, P.; Svensson, M.; Carlsson, U. Electron spin echo decay as a probe of aminoxyl environment in spin-labeled mutants of human carbonic anhydrase II. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1997, 2, 2549–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huber, M.; Lindgren, M.; Hammarström, P.; Mårtensson, L.-G.; Carlsson, U.; Eaton, G.R.; Eaton, S.S. Phase memory relaxation times of spin labels in human carbonic anhydrase II: Pulsed EPR to determine spin label location. Biophys. Chem. 2001, 94, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ward, R.; Bowman, A.; Sozudogru, E.; El-Mkami, H.; Owen-Hughes, T.; Norman, D.G. EPR Distance measurements in deuterated proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 207, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. El-Mkami, H.; Ward, R.; Bowman, A.; Owen-Hughes, T.; Norman, D.G. The spatial effect of protein deuteration on nitroxide spin-label relaxation: Implication for EPR distance measurement. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 248, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zecevic, A.A.; Eaton, G.R.; Eaton, S.S.; Lindgren, M. Dephasing of electron spin echoes for nitroxyl radicals in glassy solvents by non-methyl and methyl protons. Mol. Phys. 1998, 95, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jeschke, G.; Polyhach, Y. Distance measurements on spin-labelled biomacromolecules by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1895–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kulik, L.V.; Dzuba, S.A.; Grigoryev, I.A.; Tsvetkov, Y.D. Electron dipole-dipole interaction in ESEEM of nitroxide biradicals. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 343, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abdullin, D.; Hagelueken, G.; Hunter, R.I.; Smith, G.M.; Schiemann, O. Geometric model-based fitting algorithm for orientation-selective PELDOR data. Mol. Phys. 2014, 113, 544–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goddard-Boger, E.D.; Stick, R.V. An Efficient, Inexpensive, and Shelf-Stable Diazotransfer Reagent: Imidazole-1-sulfonyl Azide Hydrochloride. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3797–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stoll, S.; Schweiger, A. EasySpin, a comprehensive software package for spectral simulation and analysis in EPR. J. Magn. Reson. 2006, 178, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gafurov, M.; Lyubenova, S.; Denysenkov, V.; Ouari, O.; Karoui, H.; Le Moigne, F.; Tordo, P.; Prisner, T. EPR Charaterization of a Rigid Bis-TEMPO-Bis-Ketal for Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. App. Magn. Reson. 2009, 37, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Windle, J.J. Hyperfine Coupling Constantes for Nitroxide Spin Probes in Water and Carbon Tetrachloride. J. Magn. Reson. 1981, 45, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hagelueken, G.; Ward, R.; Naismith, J.H.; Schiemann, O. MtsslWizard: In Silico Spin-Labeling and Generation of Distance Distributions in PyMOL. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2012, 42, 377–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hagelueken, G.; Abdullin, D.; Ward, R.; Schiemann, O. mtsslSuite: In silico spin labelling, trilateration and distance-constrained rigid body docking. Mol. Phys. 2013, 111, 2757–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Hagelueken, G.; Abdullin, D.; Schiemann, O. mtsslSuite: Probing Biomolecular Conformation by Spin-Labeling Studies. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Wlaltham, MA, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-0-12-802834-6. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 24 04482 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of the pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR) pulse sequence and (b) Lewis structures of spin labels 1• and 2•.
Figure 1. (a) Scheme of the pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR) pulse sequence and (b) Lewis structures of spin labels 1• and 2•.
Molecules 24 04482 g001
Molecules 24 04482 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Spin labeling reaction based on the “click”-reaction. THPTA = Tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolyl-methyl)amine; DMSO = dimethylsulfoxide. (b) Sequence of the single-stranded RNA and the annealed duplex. The letter U marked in bold corresponds to the labeling positions. In the following, the RNA single strand labeled with 1• is called A while the one labeled with 2• is called B. The spin labeled single-stranded RNAs A and B were annealed to obtain duplexes A2 and B2, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) Spin labeling reaction based on the “click”-reaction. THPTA = Tris(3-hydroxypropyltriazolyl-methyl)amine; DMSO = dimethylsulfoxide. (b) Sequence of the single-stranded RNA and the annealed duplex. The letter U marked in bold corresponds to the labeling positions. In the following, the RNA single strand labeled with 1• is called A while the one labeled with 2• is called B. The spin labeled single-stranded RNAs A and B were annealed to obtain duplexes A2 and B2, respectively.
Molecules 24 04482 g002
Molecules 24 04482 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) LCMS-UV Chromatogram at 260 nm and (b) deconvoluted mass of B (calculated mass 5361.03, found mass 5361.59). (c) Overlay of the HPLC runs of the unmodified (black line) and labeled RNAs A (red line) and B (blue line). (d) Experimental cw EPR spectra of 35 µM A2 (red line) and 35 µM B2 (blue line). (e) Thermal denaturation curves of the unmodified (black line, Tm = 66 °C) and labeled RNAs A2 (red line, Tm = 58 °C) and B2 (blue line, Tm = 55 °C). (f) Circular Dichroism (CD) spectra of the unmodified (black line) and labeled RNAs A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line).
Figure 3. (a) LCMS-UV Chromatogram at 260 nm and (b) deconvoluted mass of B (calculated mass 5361.03, found mass 5361.59). (c) Overlay of the HPLC runs of the unmodified (black line) and labeled RNAs A (red line) and B (blue line). (d) Experimental cw EPR spectra of 35 µM A2 (red line) and 35 µM B2 (blue line). (e) Thermal denaturation curves of the unmodified (black line, Tm = 66 °C) and labeled RNAs A2 (red line, Tm = 58 °C) and B2 (blue line, Tm = 55 °C). (f) Circular Dichroism (CD) spectra of the unmodified (black line) and labeled RNAs A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line).
Molecules 24 04482 g003
Molecules 24 04482 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Two-pulse Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) decay curves of A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line) in deuterated buffer at 50 K. (b) Frequency domain spectrum of the time traces in (a) for A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line). The inset is a zoom-in for the frequency range 0–1 MHz. (c) Two-pulse ESEEM echo decay curves of B2 in pure deuterated buffer (blue line) and in deuterated buffer with 17% additional water (green line) both at 50 K.
Figure 4. (a) Two-pulse Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation (ESEEM) decay curves of A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line) in deuterated buffer at 50 K. (b) Frequency domain spectrum of the time traces in (a) for A2 (red line) and B2 (blue line). The inset is a zoom-in for the frequency range 0–1 MHz. (c) Two-pulse ESEEM echo decay curves of B2 in pure deuterated buffer (blue line) and in deuterated buffer with 17% additional water (green line) both at 50 K.
Molecules 24 04482 g004
Molecules 24 04482 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Q-Band PELDOR time traces of A2 acquired at different offsets (black lines) are overlaid with their PeldorFit simulations (grey lines). (b) RMSD between experimental and simulated PELDOR time traces as a function of the geometric parameter of PeldorFit for A2. (c) Q-Band PELDOR time traces of B2 acquired at different offsets (black lines) are overlaid with their PeldorFit simulations (grey lines). (d) RMSD between experimental and simulated PELDOR time traces as a function of the geometric parameter of PeldorFit for B2.
Figure 5. (a) Q-Band PELDOR time traces of A2 acquired at different offsets (black lines) are overlaid with their PeldorFit simulations (grey lines). (b) RMSD between experimental and simulated PELDOR time traces as a function of the geometric parameter of PeldorFit for A2. (c) Q-Band PELDOR time traces of B2 acquired at different offsets (black lines) are overlaid with their PeldorFit simulations (grey lines). (d) RMSD between experimental and simulated PELDOR time traces as a function of the geometric parameter of PeldorFit for B2.
Molecules 24 04482 g005
Molecules 24 04482 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Original PELDOR time trace of B2 with an 80 MHz offsets in deuterated buffer at 50 K. (b) Lifetime of 2• attached to DNA and of MTSL in the presence of 4.75 mM ascorbate or in HeLa cell lysate (for more details see Supplementary Materials).
Figure 6. (a) Original PELDOR time trace of B2 with an 80 MHz offsets in deuterated buffer at 50 K. (b) Lifetime of 2• attached to DNA and of MTSL in the presence of 4.75 mM ascorbate or in HeLa cell lysate (for more details see Supplementary Materials).
Molecules 24 04482 g006
Table
Table 1. Spin echo decay data of A2 and B2 extracted from Q-Band two-pulse ESEEM.
Table 1. Spin echo decay data of A2 and B2 extracted from Q-Band two-pulse ESEEM.
ParameterA2B2
D2OD2O + 17% H2OD2OD2O + 17% H2O
Y 0 0.560.570.470.42
T M 1 /µs20.713.421.113.7
x 1 1.91.82.02.2
T M 2 /µs1.01.01.01.0
x 2 0.80.80.80.8
Table
Table 2. Geometric parameters of the PeldorFit analysis for A2 and B2.
Table 2. Geometric parameters of the PeldorFit analysis for A2 and B2.
ParameterA2B2
rΔr(nm)4.74 (0.06) *0.22 (0.07)4.80 (0.06)0.22 (0.08)
ξΔξ(°)37/143 (10)7 (10)44/136 (10)4 (15)
βΔβ(°)56/124 (5)25 (15)34/146 (5)10 (15)
* The value in round brackets is the error of this parameter. The error is the parameter range in which 110% of the minimal RMSD is reached.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wuebben, C.; Blume, S.; Abdullin, D.; Brajtenbach, D.; Haege, F.; Kath-Schorr, S.; Schiemann, O. Site-Directed Spin Labeling of RNA with a Gem-Diethylisoindoline Spin Label: PELDOR, Relaxation, and Reduction Stability. Molecules 2019, 24, 4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244482

AMA Style

Wuebben C, Blume S, Abdullin D, Brajtenbach D, Haege F, Kath-Schorr S, Schiemann O. Site-Directed Spin Labeling of RNA with a Gem-Diethylisoindoline Spin Label: PELDOR, Relaxation, and Reduction Stability. Molecules. 2019; 24(24):4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wuebben, Christine, Simon Blume, Dinar Abdullin, Dominik Brajtenbach, Florian Haege, Stephanie Kath-Schorr, and Olav Schiemann. 2019. "Site-Directed Spin Labeling of RNA with a Gem-Diethylisoindoline Spin Label: PELDOR, Relaxation, and Reduction Stability" Molecules 24, no. 24: 4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244482

APA Style

Wuebben, C., Blume, S., Abdullin, D., Brajtenbach, D., Haege, F., Kath-Schorr, S., & Schiemann, O. (2019). Site-Directed Spin Labeling of RNA with a Gem-Diethylisoindoline Spin Label: PELDOR, Relaxation, and Reduction Stability. Molecules, 24(24), 4482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24244482

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop