Next Article in Journal
Characterisation of the Structure and Oligomerisation of Islet Amyloid Polypeptides (IAPP): A Review of Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Delivery of Chemotherapeutics: Role of Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the In Vivo and In Vitro Metabolites of Linarin in Rat Biosamples and Intestinal Flora Using Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinetic Characterization of Novel HIV-1 Entry Inhibitors: Discovery of a Relationship between Off-Rate and Potency
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules23092141
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share announcement thumb_up
...
textsms
...
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Studies of the Dynamics Effects of BAY60-2770 and BAY58-2667 Binding with Human and Bacterial H-NOX Domains

by
Rana Rehan Khalid
1,
Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar
2,
Arooma Maryam
1,
Ayesha Ashique
1,
Farooq Anwar
3,
Mohammed H. Geesi
4,* and
Abdul Rauf Siddiqi
1,*
1
Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad 45550, Pakistan
2
College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University (HZAU), Wuhan 430070, China
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(9), 2141; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092141
Received: 12 July 2018 / Revised: 11 August 2018 / Accepted: 22 August 2018 / Published: 25 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Directed Drug Design and Molecular Therapy)
Download PDF
Browse Figures

Abstract

Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) is a key enzyme implicated in various physiological processes such as vasodilation, thrombosis and platelet aggregation. The enzyme’s Heme-Nitric oxide/Oxygen (H-NOX) binding domain is the only sensor of nitric oxide (NO) in humans, which on binding with NO activates sGC to produce the second messenger cGMP. H-NOX is thus a hot target for drug design programs. BAY60-2770 and BAY58-2667 are two widely studied activators of sGC. Here we present comparative molecular dynamics studies to understand the molecular details characterizing the binding of BAY60-2770 and BAY58-2667 with the human H-NOX (hH-NOX) and bacterial H-NOX (bH-NOX) domains. HartreeFock method was used for parametrization of both the activators. A 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was run to identify the functionally critical regions of the H-NOX domains. The CPPTRAJ module was used for analysis. BAY60-2770 on binding with bH-NOX, triggered rotational movement in signaling helix F and significant dynamicity in loops α and β, but in hH-NOX domain the compound showed relatively lesser aforementioned structural fluctuations. Conversely, hH-NOX ligated BAY58-2667 experienced highest transitions in its helix F due to electrostatic interactions with D84, T85 and R88 residues which are not conserved in bH-NOX. These conformational transformations might be essential to communicate with downstream PAS, CC and cyclase domains of sGC. Comparative MD studies revealed that BAY bound bHNOX dynamics varied from that of hH-NOX, plausibly due to some key residues such as R40, F74 and Y112 which are not conserved in bacteria. These findings will help to the design of novel drug leads to cure diseases associated to human sGC.
Keywords: soluble guanylate cyclase; sGC activator compounds; quantum calculation; molecular dynamics simulation soluble guanylate cyclase; sGC activator compounds; quantum calculation; molecular dynamics simulation

1. Introduction

Soluble guanylate cyclase is a heterodimeric enzyme of 150 kDa molecular mass which consists of two subunits—alpha (α) and beta (β) [1]. Of several isoforms of α and β subunits, the α1β1 and α2β1 are predominantly expressed heterodimers of sGC in mammalian cells [2]. Starting from N-terminus, the β subunit folds into H-NOX, PAS, coiled coil (CC) and catalytic domains; the α subunit also follows the same architecture, however its N-terminal does not bind with heme and istherefore termed as pseudo-H-NOX domain [3]. The β H-NOX harbors a histidine bound heme molecule which is capable of bindingnitric oxide (NO) with femtomolar sensitivity and has been also been found to bind with other gaseous ligands such as O2 and CO, though with much lesser sensitivity than that with NO [4,5,6,7]. The sensitivity of sGC is high when its heme moiety is reduced i.e., when the heme iron is in Fe2+ state. High concentration of cellular reactive oxygen species oxidize the heme (Fe3+) disabling it from capturing small gaseous ligands which in turn leads to sGC inactivation [2]. sGC is known as the only receptor of NO in mammals, which regulates many physiological responses such as vasodilation, smooth muscle relaxation, thrombosis, platelet aggregation and inhibition of inflammation [8,9]. In mammals, cellular NO is produced by nitric oxide synthases (NOS). On NO binding, H-NOX gets activated which in-turn communicates with PAS and CC domains to activate the cyclase domain for the conversion of a GTP molecule into cGMP. The cGMP serves as second messenger playing significant role in the regulation of many downstream. sGC is therefore a hot target for designing novel drugs to cure the disorders associated to cGMP signaling pathway such as peripheral hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), heart failure and liver fibrosis [10,11].
Experimental and clinical studies have shown that impaired bioavailability of NO contributes to cardiovascular, endothelial, hepatic and pulmonary dysfunctions [12]. Organic nitrates (sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin) have been used as nitrovasodilators for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, but their utilization has some limitations such as severe hemodynamic effects including reduced bioavailability, lack of selectivity, tolerance and insufficient metabolism [13]. Therefore, therapeutic approaches sought for discovering novel modulators which could trigger sGC to enhance cGMP production. The sGC modulators have two classes, stimulators and activators. The sGC stimulators stimulate sGC directly i.e., when its heme iron is reduced (Fe2+) but NO synthesis is impaired or enzyme’s NO sensitivity is compromised. These include YC-1, BAY41-8543, BAY63-2521 (riociguat) and BAY41-2272 [2,14,15]. Among sGC stimulators, riociguat has already been approved by FDA for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension [16,17,18]. sGC activators, such as HMR-1766, BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770, bind to sGC and activate it in a NO- and heme-independent manner i.e., when heme iron of sGC has been oxidized (Fe3+) or heme has been lost by the enzyme [2,19]. Recently sGC activators have drawn attention of researchers as during oxidative stress, when the enzyme becomes inactive i.e., its heme iron is oxidized by ROS or RNS (Reactive Nitrogen Species), stimulators like riociguat cannot elicit the cyclase activity [20,21]. Among the activators, BAY58-2667 (cinaciguat) is already in clinical development by Bayer AG and has been found to elicit vasodilation while preserving the kidney function, although it has been reported to cause hypotension [22,23,24]. The drug has been also found to result a long-lasting antihypertensive effect and inhibit platelet aggregation and ischemia [25,26]. The therapeutic potential of BAY60-2770 has been also demonstrated against hypertension in rat, erectile dysfunction in obese mice, platelet aggregation in humans, and asthma in mice [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Both BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 mimic the heme moiety, (Figure 1). Both BAY activators have two charged hydrophilic carboxylate groups which are crucial to interact with the Y-S-R motif of H-NOX like heme carboxylate group. The only difference between the two activators is their hydrophobic tail. These trifurcated activators behave somewhat like heme moiety. Cinaciguat’s tri-benzyl tail establishes hydrophobic binding modes with L4, W74, T78, K83, F97, L101, L104, V108, L148, and L152 residues in bacteria. In contrast to BAY58-2667, the hydrophobic tail of BAY60-2770 extends with fluoro and trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moieties which contribute to extensive interactions with binding pocket residues such as Y2, Y83, S111 and F112 [11,22].
In this study, we seek to reveal the dynamics effects of sGC activators BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 on bacterial and human H-NOX domains (bH-NOX and hH-NOX). The study aims to enhance our understanding of binding pocket behavior against the activator compounds in both the biological systems (bacteria and humans) and observe the most prominent dynamic events that might be involved in signal transduction for cGMP production. Stability of activator bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX complexes was studied by 50 ns MD simulations. We have observed that there are some non-conserved residue positions in the binding pocket that may affect the dynamics of H-NOX in both systems. This study would therefore provide further insight for designing drug screening projects against H-NOX.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Comparative Modeling

Crystal structures of Nostoc H-NOX domains bound to BAY60-2770 (PDB ID: 4IAE) [11] and cinaciguat (BAY58-2667) (PDB ID: 3L6J) [22] were used as a template to model the hH-NOX domain. hH-NOX is encoded by first 186 N-terminal residues of the β subunit of sGC. Query sequence showed 34 percent identity with the template. Statistical parameters such as z-DOPE score [33], GA341 [34], TM-score [35] were employed to evaluate and validate the predicted hH-NOX models. All the three metrics were found to lie in the most favorable ranges: z-DOPE was found to be −1.04 [36], fold reliability GA341 was 1 (100% reliable predicted fold) and global structure quality TM-score was found to be 0.83 (Figure 2). A Ramachandran plot of the initially predicted model showed that 94.6% residues were in the favored region while 97.3% residues lied in the allowed region [37]. These models were then subjected to refinement through YASARA [38]. After the refinement, 98.3% residues of the models were observed to lie in the favored region and 99.4% in the allowed region.
The complexes, BAY58-2667 bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX (bbay58 and hbay58, respectively) and BAY60-2770 bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX complexes (bbay60 and hbay60, respectively), were submitted to Ligplot tool [39], to visualize the binding modes of initial models. Figure 3 describes the interaction network of the energy-minimized BAY58-2667 and BAY58-2667 bound structures of hH-NOX and bH-NOX (hbay60 and hbay58).

2.2. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

To evaluate the conformational stability of BAY58-2667 bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX (bbay58 and hbay58, respectively) and BAY60-2770-bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX complexes (bbay60 and hbay60, respectively), root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) were investigated for all backbone atoms whereas the radius of gyration (RoG) was examined for all-atoms through CPPTRAJ [40]. Figure 4 shows 50 ns RMSD trajectories of bbay58, hbay58, bbay60 and hbay60. Both bbay58 and hbay58 showed higher RMSD values across entire trajectory of 50 ns than bbay60 and hbay60 with an average RMSD of 3.8 Å. RMSD values of bbay58 and hbay58 structures also varied significantly during the last 10 ns of simulation, showing instable binding behavior of BAY58-2667 with bH-NOX. Whereas trajectories of bbay60 and hbay60 showed much lower RMSD with an average deviation of 2 Å across the entire 50 ns trajectory. In contrast to those of bbay58 and hbay58, both the bbay60 and hbay60 trajectories followed the similar behavior exhibiting the stability of BAY60-2770 bound structures. An evident deviation in RMSD behavior was noticed which may be attributed to ligand type and not to the biological system (bH-NOX, hH-NOX). These results are consistent with earlier findings which suggested that trifluoromethyl-biphenyl hydrophobic tail of BAY60-2770 was responsible for increased stability and fold integrity of BAY60-2770 bound complex of Nostoc H-NOX [11].
Figure 5 shows the RMSF plots for the four ligand bound complexes delineating the net 3D movement of all residues of bH-NOX and hH-NOX of binding with BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770. RMSF trajectories of the four complexes have also been compared with that of hH-NOX bound with NO (hhme-NO). The RMSF plot describes that in hbay58 the residues 88–91 (HE), 125–129 (loop β) and 171–174 (loop δ) show fluctuations at 2.6 Å, 2 Å and 2.4 Å, respectively. These fluctuations play a significant role in the activation of sGC enzyme; previous studies also demonstrated that on NO binding loops β and δ of H-NOX show substantial displacements [41]. In bbay58 fluctuations of 2.4 Å, 1.3 Å, and 1.8 Å across loop segment between helices B and C (a.a. 31–35), helix F (a.a. 103–112) and loop δ (a.a. 171–175) were observed respectively. The bbay58 complex behaved slightly different as compared to hbay58 because some BAY58-2667 binding residues in the binding pockets of bH-NOX and hH-NOX are not conserved. Supposedly, the RMSF peaks observed across helix F owe to its earlier observed rotational movement [41], which displaces the following loop regions away from their original position; helping to activate sGC [41]. In hbay60, the region spanning through helix F to loop β and loop δ showed on average 2.4 Å and 3.4 Å fluctuations respectively. Loop δ fluctuation was significantly high among all systems and the fluctuation pattern was observed to be quite similar to that exhibited by NO bound hH-NOX complex (hheme-NO). Thus it might be possible that loop δ residues transduce signals to neighboring PAS and CC domains for the onward communication to sGC cyclase domain. In case of hbay60, BAY60-2770 binding elicited higher fluctuations in the loop β and δ residues than those observed in hbay58. Conversely, bbay60 showed fluctuations across loop segment between helices B and C (a.a. 31–35), loop α (a.a. 110–116), β (a.a.125–130) and δ (a.a. 170–174) measuring 2 Å, 2 Å, 2 Å and 2.8 Å, respectively. In both bbay60 and hbay60, loop δ showed considerably high fluctuations.
All the systems remained compact up to 25 ns with the average radius of gyration (RoG) of 17.3 Å (Figure 6). After 25 ns, bbay60 lost compactness rising to as much as 20.5 Å by the end of simulation, showing highest fold movement amongst all the systems. Subsequently, the binding pocket slightly opened causing the water molecules to infiltrate in the protein’s hydrophobic core, thereby increasing the surface accessibility and ligand interactions. Average RoG for Bay60-2770 bound hH-NOX (hbay60) remained 17.5 Å for first 25 ns rising to 18 Å in the end, signifying moderate fold movement in the event of Bay60-2770 binding with hH-NOX. In case of hbay58, the RoG rose gradually to 19.5 Å, after remaining consistent at 17.5 Å for the first 25 ns. The complex bbay58 was found to be the most compact structure amongst all the systems showing consistent 17.5 Å RoG for the first 42 ns ending at RoG of 18 Å implying that the bH-NOX fold remained intact most of the time with a little movement in the end. High RoG in case of bbay60 contributes to the outward movement of the bH-NOX’s proximal side of the binding site and higher fluctuation of loop region between helices B and C. Rise of RoG during 26–50 ns was due to large movements by loop δ as observed in RMSF analysis.

2.3. Hydrogen Bond Analysis

Hydrogen bond analysis was performed to investigate stability and persistence (occupancy) of hydrogen bonds between BAY compounds and key residues of the binding pockets of bH-NOX and hH-NOX over the 50 ns simulation [42]. Gnuplots at panels A, B, C and D (Figure 7) for bbay60, hbay60, bbay58 and hbay58 respectively show that carboxylate group atoms, OAA, AAB, OAC and OAD, of both the activators behave like heme propionate moiety forming strong and stable hydrogen bonds with Y2, R116, and Y-S-R (Y135-S137-R139) motif of bH-NOX and hH-NOX. This interaction was observed in both of the biological systems, but BAY58-2667 hydrogen bond fraction values are high as compared to those observed with BAY60-2770. Figure 7A reveals that BAY60-2770 fluoro and trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moiety atoms, FAA, FAE, FAJ and FAK, exhibit few hydrogen bond interactions with binding pocket residues Y83 and S111 in case of bbay58; however in hbay60, these atoms show electrostatic attractions for Y2, R40, Y83 and Y112 residues (Figure 7B). Generally, more stable hydrogen bonding has been observed in hbay60. These results indicate that trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moiety of BAY60-2770 favors the formation of a stable complex with binding site residues of hH-NOX than those of bH-NOX. In bbay58 complex, ether oxygen (OBF) shows strong hydrogen bond interaction with W74. The substitution of bacterial W74 with F74 in hH-NOX contributes to slight displacement of the bound BAY compounds towards proximal side of the binding pocket. Therefore, the hydrogen bond between ether oxygen (OBF) and H105 might likely restrict the signaling helix F specifically in hbay60. Further investigation showed that in hbay60, Y2 showed strong hydrogen bond interaction with trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moiety atoms which was absent in bbay60 (Figure 7A,B). The hydrogen analysis also explained an earlier finding that F112 mediates the rotational movement of helix F in bH-NOX [15]. The bH-NOX F112 shows strong proximal site interactions with surrounding residues such as V108, L115, G109, Q114, and S111 (Table 1). Generally the hydrogen bond forming atoms were the same in hbay58 and bbay58 and bbay60 and hbay60 with the exception of those involved in bonding with trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moiety (Figure 7). Therefore, the aforementioned analysis implies that tail of BAY58-2776 shows more flexibility as compared to that of BAY60-2770.
Key residues involved in hydrogen bond network across binding sites of bbay60, hbay60, bbay58 and hbay58 were also studied. We observed that residues V108, F112, G109, S111 and L115 in case of bH-NOX, and Y2, Y83, L108, Y112 and M112 in case of hH-NOX were involved in hydrogen binding network across binding sites. However, position 112 was specifically crucial as residues occupying this position both in bH-NOX and hH-NOX, F112 and Y112 respectively, were involved in most of the binding pocket hydrogen bonds over the entire path of the 50 ns trajectory (Table 1). Thus, the aforesaid residues were found to be the key determinants for the binding pocket integrity and complexation with the BAY compounds allosterically.

2.4. Principle Component Analysis

Principle component analysis (PCA) was undertaken to investigate the dynamics of BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 binding with bH-NOX and hH-NOX domains. PCA results indicated that hbay58 showed highest movement across loop β (a.a. 124–129), and relatively lesser movement across loop δ (a.a.169–177) region (Figure 8B). Uncoiling of small β fragment across residues 83–91 was also observed due to electrostatic interactions between BAY atoms and the hH-NOX residues R40, D84, T85 and R88, not found in bH-NOX (Figure 8A,B). The activation signal may thus be transduced through loop β and the loop δ as these regions showed significant movements. Previous dynamics studies of post NO binding activation mechanism of sGC described the significance of helix F, and loop β [41], but the dynamic changes in drug bound systems were not studied. Here we found that helix F did not show massive displacement thus the binding cavity did not open as much in BAY bound H-NOX as in NO bound H-NOX (Figure 8B,D). In bbay58, helix F showed a slight rotational movement, and this movement was suggestively driven by the presence of F 112. That much rotational movement of helix F was not observed in hbay58 and hbay60, putatively due to residue Y112 in hH-NOX which showed strong interactions with Y2, R40, and Y83 residues, thus limiting the rotational movement of helix F in hH-NOX. Therefore, in case of hbay60 minimal movement was observed in loops α, β, γ, δ and helix F.
Our analysis reveals that though BAY compounds cannot activate hH-NOX as efficiently as in case of NO-bound hH-NOX, these compounds can generate the required dynamics capable to activate sGC considerably. This is particularly important in case of oxidized (inactive) state of H-NOX [43,44]. The findings of this study also suggest that dynamicity in loop β in hH-NOX is the key signal which leads to the cascade of dynamic events through loop δ and helix-F, ultimately culminating into an activated hH-NOX. As these secondary structure elements lie near the c-terminal or proximal end of the H-NOX domain, putatively the aforesaid dynamic events also serve to communicate the downstream activation signal through interacting with the neighboring PAS domain of sGC. A relatively lesser movement of helix F has been observed in case of hbay58 and hbay60 compared to that observed in corresponding bacterial BAY bound complexes. This is an interesting finding, earlier in-vitrostudies [7] have demonstrated that hH-NOX is the most sensitive NO sensor in the entire H-NOX family. Therefore even a lesser dynamicity characterized by the BAY binding with hH-NOX, than that observed in case of NO binding, might be enough to elicit the activation reported by earlier studies carried out in rats, mice and humans [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. These findings highlight the importance of targeting other regions of H-NOX to explore potential allosteric sites which may help designing drugs for NO-independent activation of sGC. This study also elucidates in detail the mechanism of the BAY activators’ binding with bH-NOX and hH-NOX, comparing the key residues involved in the architecture of heme binding sites and their varied roles in H-NOX activation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Comparative Modeling

sGC activators (BAY58-2667, BAY60-2770) bound bH-NOX domains PDB ID: 3L6J [22] and PDB ID: 4IAE [11] were used as a reference for comparative dynamics studies with hH-NOX domain. Human beta H-NOX target sequence showed 34% sequence identity, 51% sequence homology and 99% query coverage with Nostoc H-NOX domain with a bit score of 105, which was thus chosen as a template structure for comparative modeling; PDB structures 3L6J and 4IAE were used for predicting hH-NOX domains. Modeller 9.16 [45] was employed for homology modeling, best models were selected on the basis of z-DOPE score, RMSD, and global structure quality. The predicted models were validated through RAMPAGE [46]. Energy minimizations and refinements of initial models were done through YASARA [38]. MolProbity server was used to validate all the stereochemical characteristics of predicted models [37]. Pymol builder module was used to add an NO molecule bonded with Fe2+ of heme prosthetic group of hH-NOX domain [47].

3.2. sGC Activators Charge Derivation

Restrained electrostatic potential charge calculation was done for BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 compounds, Antechamber17 [48] was used to produce Gaussian input file for quantum mechanics calculations. The HartreeFock method and 6-31G* basis set were used for optimization and charge calculation [49]. The first and second stage RESP was calculated by using Antechamber17 program, prep file for non-stranded residues was generated for parametrizing complete H-NOX drug bound systems.

3.3. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

sGC activator systems, which included hH-NOX bound with BAY58-2667, BAY60-2770 (hbay58, hbay60) and bH-NOX bound with BAY58-2667, BAY60-2770 (bbay58, bbay60) and NO bound hH-NOX, were subjected to molecular dynamics simulation. FF14SB force field was used for receptor protein in Amber14 [50]. The orthogonal box was used to immerse the systems with TIP3P water model [51]. Tleap was employed for adding missing hydrogen atoms and neutralizing the systems. All the five systems were enabled for periodic boundary conditions [52]. The cutoff was set 10 Å for long-range electrostatics interactions (PME) [53]. Parametrization of hH-NOX domain active site (NO-heme-H105) was accomplished through quantum calculation (Gaussian 09).B3LYP theory and 6-31G* basis set were implemented for the optimization and force constant calculation. After completing parameterization, all the systems were accounted for energy minimization (20,000 steps) to remove the steric clashes. Langevin thermostat was used for annealing the systems from 0 to 300 K at constant volume for 200 ps. Moreover, all four models were run for 50 ns during the production phase. SHAKE [54] was applied to constrained covalent bond containing hydrogen. All the simulations process was run with the integration step of 2 fs. We used CPPTRAJ v17.00 [40] for post-processing trajectories analysis which included fundamental stability analysis (RMSD, RMSF, and ROG) as well as more advanced analyses like hydrogen bond analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). VMD [55] was used for visualization of trajectories in real time, while Gnuplot [42] and Xmgrace [56] tools were used for graphical representations of plots.

3.4. Hydrogen Bond Occupancy

Hydrogen bonding has an essential role in the folding of proteins CPPTRAJ v17.00 was applied to estimate the solute-solute, solute-solvent and solute solvent-solute bridging hydrogen interactions of all human and bacterial H-NOX bound BAY compounds (hbay58, hbay60, bbay58, bbhay60) [57]. Hydrogen bond interactions of BAY60-2770 and BAY58-2776 with bH-NOX and hH-NOX binding pocket and distal and proximal residues were also analyzed. Hydrogen bonds among all the four systems were compared to explain different dynamic events attributed to hydrogen bond occupancy. Gnuplot and Xmgrace were used to analyze hydrogen bond occurrence and its lifetime (fraction).

3.5. Principal Component Analysis

Before undertaking principal component analysis, CPPTRAJ v17.00 module was employed to strip solvent and ions from 50 ns long MD trajectories. These modified striped trajectories were aligned over minimized reference structure. All backbone atoms were used as a mask to perform PCA [57]. PCs of the four systems were determined by diagonalizing the covariance matrix which generates eigenvalues. MD trajectories were then projected over these eigenmodes. We noticed that first three PCs cover entire motion of 50 ns long trajectories. Principle component analysis scatters plots were then generated using Xmgrace. VMD was used to visualize the uncorrelated systems movements more conclusively and to create all structural diagrams. ProDy interface of Normal mode wizard was applied to generate porcupine plot [58].

4. Conclusions

The carboxylate groups of both the BAY compounds maintained similar interaction patterns with the Y-S-R motif and R116 residue of H-NOX as exhibited by heme. Their ether oxygen shows a strong interaction with W74 in the bH-NOX system, but this residue is not conserved in hH-NOX due to which oxygen forms astrong interaction with H105. This interaction is shifted towards the proximal side of the binding site of hH-NOX. Both BAY compounds caused high fluctuation in the loop region between helix B and C in case of bH-NOX. It may be due to M40 which showed no interaction with its Y83, R88, and 112Y residues while in hH-NOX, R40 showed strong interactions with those residues. BAY58-2667 triggered small rotational movement in helix F which is vital for sGC activation. Conversely, when BAY60-2770 binds with hH-NOX, the helical fragment remains stable because of the interaction of trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moiety with Y2, R40, Y83 residues. It was found that BAY60-2770 generated considerable movement in loops β and δ; especially in hH-NOX, loop δ movement was highest among all systems. BAY58-2667 precisely rotates the helix F and elicits loop β fluctuations.Based on the simulation analysis of aforementioned complexes, we can propose that helix F, loops β and δ may be involved in signal transduction mechanism from H-NOX to adjacent PAS domains, but this dynamics pattern differsfrom NO bound H-NOX activation dynamics in which helix F, loop β movement was found to be several folds higher. Target-based drug discovery approaches can be used to modify the BAY compounds to make them more specific and selective to human sGC.

Author Contributions

A.R.S. and M.H.G. conceived and designed the experiments; R.R.K. performed the experiments and wrote the paper; A.M., A.A. and M.T.u.Q. analyzed the data; A.R.S., F.A. and M.H.G. revised and improved the paper.

Funding

This research was partially funded by Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, grant number 2015/01/4784 and Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan, grant number NRPU 4050.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia for the provision of partial funding and Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for providing facilities for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Campbell, M.G.; Underbakke, E.S.; Potter, C.S.; Carragher, B.; Marletta, M.A. Single-particle EM reveals the higher-order domain architecture of soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2960–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  2. Evgenov, O.V.; Pacher, P.; Schmidt, P.M.; Haskó, G.; Schmidt, H.H.; Stasch, J.P. NO-independent stimulators and activators of soluble guanylate cyclase: Discovery and therapeutic potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Underbakke, E.S.; Iavarone, A.T.; Chalmers, M.J.; Pascal, B.D.; Novick, S.; Griffin, P.R.; Marletta, M.A. Nitric Oxide-Induced Conformational Changes in Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Struct. Des. 2014, 22, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  4. Mayer, B.; Koesling, D. cGMP signalling beyond nitric oxide. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2001, 22, 546–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Bogatenkova, E.; Murad, F.; Tsai, A.L. Ligand selectivity of soluble guanylyl cyclase: Effect of the hydrogen-bonding tyrosine in the distal heme pocket on binding of oxygen, nitric oxide, and carbon monoxide. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27836–27845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Montfort, W.R.; Wales, J.A.; Weichsel, A. Structure and Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase, the Nitric Oxide Sensor. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 26, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Nioche, P.; Berka, V.; Vipond, J.; Minton, N.; Tsai, A.L.; Raman, C.S. Femtomolar sensitivity of a NO sensor from Clostridium botulinum. Science 2004, 306, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Feelisch, M. The use of nitric oxide donors in pharmacological studies. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1998, 358, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ignarro, L.J.; Harbison, R.G.; Wood, K.S.; Kadowitz, P.J. Dissimilarities between methylene blue and cyanide on relaxation and cyclic GMP formation in endothelium-intact intrapulmonary artery caused by nitrogen oxide-containing vasodilators and acetylcholine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1986, 236, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Stone, J.R.; Marletta, M.A. Spectral and kinetic studies on the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kumar, V.; Martin, F.; Hahn, M.G.; Schaefer, M.; Stamler, J.S.; Stasch, J.P.; Van Den Akker, F. Insights into BAY60-2770 activation and S-nitrosylation-dependent desensitization of soluble guanylyl cyclase via crystal structures of homologous Nostoc H-NOX domain complexes. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 3601–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fouad, Y.M.; Yehia, R. Hepato-cardiac disorders. World J. Hepatol. 2014, 6, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Katsuki, S.; Arnold, W.; Mittal, C.; Murad, F. Stimulation of guanylate cyclase by sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin and nitric oxide in various tissue preparations and comparison to the effects of sodium azide and hydroxylamine. J. Cycl. Nucleotide Res. 1977, 3, 23–35. [Google Scholar]
  14. Stasch, J.P.; Becker, E.M.; Alonso-Alija, C.; Apeler, H.; Dembowsky, K.; Feurer, A.; Gerzer, R.; Minuth, T.; Perzborn, E.; Pleiß, U.; et al. NO-independent regulatory site on soluble guanylate cyclase. Nature 2001, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stasch, J.P.; Schmidt, P.; Alonso-Alija, C.; Apeler, H.; Dembowsky, K.; Haerter, M.; Heil, M.; Minuth, T.; Perzborn, E.; Pleiss, U.; et al. NO- and haem-independent activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase: Molecular basis and cardiovascular implications of a new pharmacological principle. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 136, 773–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Belik, J. Riociguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2009, 10, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Food and Drug Administration FDA Approves Adempas to Treat Pulmonary Hypertension. 2013. Available online: www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm370866.htm (accessed on 29 April 2014).
  18. Khaybullina, D.; Patel, A.; Zerilli, T. Riociguat (adempas): A novel agent for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Pharm. Ther. 2014, 39, 749–758. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schindler, U.; Strobel, H.; Sch, K.; Linz, W.; Matthias, L.; Martorana, P.A.; Hartmut, R.; Schindler, P.W.; Busch, A.E.; Sohn, M.; et al. Biochemistry and Pharmacology of Novel Anthranilic Acid Derivatives Activating Heme-Oxidized Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nossaman, B.; Pankey, E.; Kadowitz, P. Stimulators and activators of soluble guanylate cyclase: Review and potential therapeutic indications. Crit. Care Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 290805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schwemmer, M.; Bassenge, E. New approaches to overcome tolerance to nitrates. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2003, 17, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Martin, F.; Baskaran, P.; Ma, X.; Dunten, P.W.; Schaefer, M.; Stasch, J.P.; Beuve, A.; Van Den Akker, F. Structure of cinaciguat (BAY58-2667) bound to Nostoc H-NOX domain reveals insights into heme-mimetic activation of the soluble guanylyl cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22651–22657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lapp, H.; Mitrovic, V.; Franz, N.; Heuer, H.; Buerke, M.; Wolfertz, J.; Mueck, W.; Unger, S.; Wensing, G.; Frey, R. Cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667) improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Circulation 2009, 119, 2781–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boerrigter, G.; Costello-Boerrigter, L.C.; Cataliotti, A.; Lapp, H.; Stasch, J.P.; Burnett, J.C., Jr. Targeting heme-oxidized soluble guanylate cyclase in experimental heart failure. Hypertension 2007, 49, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Erdmann, E.; Semigran, M.J.; Nieminen, M.S.; Gheorghiade, M.; Agrawal, R.; Mitrovic, V.; Mebazaa, A. Cinaciguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase activator, unloads the heart but also causes hypotension in acute decompensated heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tamargo, J.; Duarte, J.; Caballero, R.; Delpon, E. Cinaciguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase activator for the potential treatment of acute heart failure. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2010, 11, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Salloum, F.N.; Das, A.; Samidurai, A.; Hoke, N.N.; Chau, V.Q.; Ockaili, R.A.; Stasch, J.P.; Kukreja, R.C. Cinaciguat, a novel activator of soluble guanylate cyclase, protects against ischemia/reperfusion injury: Role of hydrogen sulfide. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 302, H1347–H1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hausding, M.; Kopp, M.; Steven, S.; Schulz, E.; Stasch, J.P.; Munzel, T.; Daiber, A. Effect of soluble guanylyl cyclase activator and stimulator therapy on nitroglycerin-induced nitrate tolerance in rats. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2015, 71, 181–191. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  29. Tawa, M.; Shimosato, T.; Iwasaki, H.; Imamura, T.; Okamura, T. Different influences of extracellular and intracellular superoxide on relaxation through the NO/sGC/cGMP pathway in isolated rat iliac arteries. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2015, 65, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Alexandre, E.C.; Leiria, L.O.; Silva, F.H.; Mendes-Silverio, C.B.; Calmasini, F.B.; Davel, A.P.; Monica, F.Z.; De Nucci, G.; Antunes, E. Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) degradation and impairment of nitric oxide-mediated responses in urethra from obese mice: Reversal by the sGC activator BAY60-2770. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 349, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Leiria, L.O.; Silva, F.H.; Davel, A.P.; Alexandre, E.C.; Calixto, M.C.; De Nucci, G.; Monica, F.Z.; Antunes, E. The soluble guanylyl cyclase activator BAY60-2770 ameliorates overactive bladder in obese mice. J. Urol. 2014, 191, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mendes-Silverio, C.B.; Leiria, L.O.; Morganti, R.P.; Anhe, G.F.; Marcondes, S.; Monica, F.Z.; De Nucci, G.; Antunes, E. Activation of haem-oxidized soluble guanylyl cyclase with BAY 60-2770 in human platelets lead to overstimulation of the cyclic GMP signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ghosh, A.; Koziol-White, C.J.; Asosingh, K.; Cheng, G.; Ruple, L.; Groneberg, D.; Friebe, A.; Comhair, S.A.; Stasch, J.P.; Panettieri, R.A., Jr.; et al. Soluble guanylate cyclase as an alternative target for bronchodilator therapy in asthma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E2355–E2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jabs, A.; Oelze, M.; Mikhed, Y.; Stamm, P.; Kroller-Schon, S.; Welschof, P.; Jansen, T.; Shen, M.Y.; Sali, A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 2507–2524. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  35. Melo, F.; Sanchez, R.; Sali, A. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 430–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Skolnick, J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004, 57, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, V.B.; Arendall, W.B.; Headd, J.J.; Keedy, D.A.; Immormino, R.M.; Kapral, G.J.; Murray, L.W.; Richardson, J.S.; Richardson, D.C. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. ActaCrystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Krieger, E.; Koraimann, G.; Vriend, G. Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA—A self-parameterizing force field. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2002, 47, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Laskowski, R.A.; Swindells, M.B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Roe, D.R.; Cheatham, T.E. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3084–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Capece, L.; Estrin, D.A.; Marti, M.A. Dynamical characterization of the heme NO oxygen binding (HNOX) domain. Insight into soluble guanylate cyclase allosteric transition. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 9416–9427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Williams, T.; Kelley, C. Gnuplot4.4: An Interactive Plotting Program. 2010. 1986–1993. Available online: http//Sourceforge.Net/Projects/Gnuplot (accessed on 11 August 2018).
  43. Knorr, A.; Hirth-Dietrich, C.; Alonso-Alija, C.; Härter, M.; Hahn, M.; Keim, Y.; Wunder, F.; Stasch, J.-P. Nitric oxide-independent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase by BAY60-2770 in experimental liver fibrosis. Arzneimittelforschung 2008, 58, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Hoffmann, L.S.; Schmidt, P.M.; Keim, Y.; Hoffmann, C.; Schmidt, H.H.H.W.; Stasch, J.P. Fluorescence dequenching makes haem-free soluble guanylate cyclase detectable in living cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eswar, N.; Webb, B.; Marti-Renom, M.A.; Madhusudhan, M.S.; Eramian, D.; Shen, M.-Y.; Pieper, U.; Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lovell, S.C.; Davis, I.W.; Arendall, W.B.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Word, J.M.; Prisant, M.G.; Richardson, J.S.; Richardson, D.C. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi, psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins 2003, 50, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Schrödinger LLC Wwwpymolorg. Version 1. 2002. Available online: http://www.pymol.org. doi:citeulike-article-id:240061 (accessed on 23 August 2006).
  48. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Kollman, P.A.; Case, D.A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2006, 25, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maier, J.A.; Martinez, C.; Kasavajhala, K.; Wickstrom, L.; Hauser, K.E.; Simmerling, C. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3696–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mark, P.; Nilsson, L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 9954–9960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jorgensen, W.L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J.D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M.L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Harvey, M.J.; De Fabritiis, G. An implementation of the smooth particle mesh Ewald method on GPU hardware. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 2371–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gonnet, P. P-SHAKE: A quadratically convergent SHAKE in O (n2). J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 220, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Turner, P.J. XMGRACE, Version 5.1.19; Center for Coastal and Land-Margin Research, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology: Beaverton, OR, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  57. Amadei, A.; Linssen, A.B.M.; Berendsen, H.J.C. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 1993, 17, 412–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bakan, A.; Meireles, L.M.; Bahar, I. ProDy: Protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1575–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 23 02141 g001 550
Figure 1. BAY activators, BAY58-2667 (4-[[(4-carboxybutyl)[2-[2-[[4-(2-phenylethyl)phenyl]methoxy] phenyl] ethyl]amino]methyl]benzoic acid) and BAY60-2770(4-({(4-carboxybutyl)[2-(5-fluoro-2-{[4’-(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl-4-yl]methoxy}phenyl)ethyl]amino}methyl)benzoic acid) used in this study; conventional names and chemical structure of both the activators are also given. Aliphatic and aromatic carboxyl groups are illustrated as OAC, OAA, and OAD, OAB respectively; Fluorine atoms of BAY60-2770’s fluoro and trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moieties have been represented as FAA, FAE, FAJ, and FAK.
Figure 1. BAY activators, BAY58-2667 (4-[[(4-carboxybutyl)[2-[2-[[4-(2-phenylethyl)phenyl]methoxy] phenyl] ethyl]amino]methyl]benzoic acid) and BAY60-2770(4-({(4-carboxybutyl)[2-(5-fluoro-2-{[4’-(trifluoromethyl)biphenyl-4-yl]methoxy}phenyl)ethyl]amino}methyl)benzoic acid) used in this study; conventional names and chemical structure of both the activators are also given. Aliphatic and aromatic carboxyl groups are illustrated as OAC, OAA, and OAD, OAB respectively; Fluorine atoms of BAY60-2770’s fluoro and trifluoromethyl-biphenyl moieties have been represented as FAA, FAE, FAJ, and FAK.
Molecules 23 02141 g001
Molecules 23 02141 g002 550
Figure 2. Models of hH-NOX bound with BAY58-2667 (hbay58) and BAY60-2770 (hbay60). hH-NOX domain consists of seven α helices and four β strands. Important secondary structure elements have been shown.
Figure 2. Models of hH-NOX bound with BAY58-2667 (hbay58) and BAY60-2770 (hbay60). hH-NOX domain consists of seven α helices and four β strands. Important secondary structure elements have been shown.
Molecules 23 02141 g002
Molecules 23 02141 g003 550
Figure 3. From a to d, 2D graphical outlay of binding modes of sGC activators bound in the binding pockets of human and bacterial H-NOX domains (bbay60, hbay60, bbay58, hbay58). The energy minimized starting structures (hbay58 and hbay60) along with bbay58 and bbay60 (crystal structures) were subjected to MD production phase. Green dotted lines represent Hydrogen bonds whereas hydrophobic interactions are shown by red archs, the ligand atoms are shown in blue and black ball and stick model whereas protein atoms are shown in brown (stick) and black (ball). Aliphatic and aromatic carboxyl groups atoms of activators (OAA, AAB, OAC, OAD) exhibited prominent hydrogen bond interaction with functionally critical residues such as Y2, R116, Y135, S137, R139 in hH-NOX andY2, W74, R116, Y134, S136, R138 in bH-NOX.
Figure 3. From a to d, 2D graphical outlay of binding modes of sGC activators bound in the binding pockets of human and bacterial H-NOX domains (bbay60, hbay60, bbay58, hbay58). The energy minimized starting structures (hbay58 and hbay60) along with bbay58 and bbay60 (crystal structures) were subjected to MD production phase. Green dotted lines represent Hydrogen bonds whereas hydrophobic interactions are shown by red archs, the ligand atoms are shown in blue and black ball and stick model whereas protein atoms are shown in brown (stick) and black (ball). Aliphatic and aromatic carboxyl groups atoms of activators (OAA, AAB, OAC, OAD) exhibited prominent hydrogen bond interaction with functionally critical residues such as Y2, R116, Y135, S137, R139 in hH-NOX andY2, W74, R116, Y134, S136, R138 in bH-NOX.
Molecules 23 02141 g003
Molecules 23 02141 g004 550
Figure 4. 50 ns RMSD trajactories of the backbone atoms of BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX complexes (bbay58, hbay58, bbay60 and hbay60). Y-axis represents the value of RMSD in Angstroms (Å) and the X-axis shows the duration of the simulation trajectory in nanoseconds (ns). All the four trajectories are traced in different colors, BAY58-2667 bound hH-NOX (hbay58) is represented in black; BAY58-2667 bound bH-NOX (bbay58) is shown in red; BAY60-2770 bound bH-NOX (bbay60) is illustrated in green and BAY60-2770 bound hH-NOX (hbay60) is shown in blue.
Figure 4. 50 ns RMSD trajactories of the backbone atoms of BAY58-2667 and BAY60-2770 bound bH-NOX and hH-NOX complexes (bbay58, hbay58, bbay60 and hbay60). Y-axis represents the value of RMSD in Angstroms (Å) and the X-axis shows the duration of the simulation trajectory in nanoseconds (ns). All the four trajectories are traced in different colors, BAY58-2667 bound hH-NOX (hbay58) is represented in black; BAY58-2667 bound bH-NOX (bbay58) is shown in red; BAY60-2770 bound bH-NOX (bbay60) is illustrated in green and BAY60-2770 bound hH-NOX (hbay60) is shown in blue.
Molecules 23 02141 g004
Molecules 23 02141 g005 550
Figure 5. Average fluctuation experienced by each H-NOX residue, backbone atoms, represented as root mean square fluctuation or RMSF traces: hbay58 (black), bbay58 (red), bbay60 (green), hbay60 (blue) and NO bound heme Fe2+-hH-NOX or hheme-NO (purple) over the course of 50 ns simulation. Y-axis shows RMSF in Angstroms Å and X-axis represents H-NOX residues from N to C terminus (residue index). The X-axis also shows secondary structure layout of the H-NOX structure, helices are represented as red springs, loops as green lines, turns as green curves and strands as yellow arrows.
Figure 5. Average fluctuation experienced by each H-NOX residue, backbone atoms, represented as root mean square fluctuation or RMSF traces: hbay58 (black), bbay58 (red), bbay60 (green), hbay60 (blue) and NO bound heme Fe2+-hH-NOX or hheme-NO (purple) over the course of 50 ns simulation. Y-axis shows RMSF in Angstroms Å and X-axis represents H-NOX residues from N to C terminus (residue index). The X-axis also shows secondary structure layout of the H-NOX structure, helices are represented as red springs, loops as green lines, turns as green curves and strands as yellow arrows.
Molecules 23 02141 g005
Molecules 23 02141 g006 550
Figure 6. All-atoms radius of gyration (RoG) variations over 50 ns time period in case of hbay60, bbay60 and hbay58 and bbay58, all the four systems remained compact, with a consistent RoG of 17.5 Å for the first half of the simulation i.e., 25 ns. RoG was observed to loose consistence post 25 ns phase, bbay60 showing the highest rise of RoG ending at 20.5 Å. followed by hbay58 (19 Å), hbay60 (18.5 Å) and bbay60 (18.5 Å).
Figure 6. All-atoms radius of gyration (RoG) variations over 50 ns time period in case of hbay60, bbay60 and hbay58 and bbay58, all the four systems remained compact, with a consistent RoG of 17.5 Å for the first half of the simulation i.e., 25 ns. RoG was observed to loose consistence post 25 ns phase, bbay60 showing the highest rise of RoG ending at 20.5 Å. followed by hbay58 (19 Å), hbay60 (18.5 Å) and bbay60 (18.5 Å).
Molecules 23 02141 g006
Molecules 23 02141 g007 550
Figure 7. Hydrogen bond occupancy as observed in bbay60 (A), hbay60 (B), bbay58 (C) and hbay58 (D) complexes during 50 ns simulation period, outlaid at X-axis. Y-axis shows hydrogen bond forming atoms of the BAY compounds and binding residues of H-NOX, the atom abbreviations are same as illustrated in Figure 1. Hydrogen bonds were recorded throughout the 50 ns trajectory in all the four complexes. Yellow bars indicate the event of hydrogen bond formation as observed at that point of time at X-axis. Length of the yellow trace illustrates the occupancy or the time duration for which the respective hydrogen bond was observed.
Figure 7. Hydrogen bond occupancy as observed in bbay60 (A), hbay60 (B), bbay58 (C) and hbay58 (D) complexes during 50 ns simulation period, outlaid at X-axis. Y-axis shows hydrogen bond forming atoms of the BAY compounds and binding residues of H-NOX, the atom abbreviations are same as illustrated in Figure 1. Hydrogen bonds were recorded throughout the 50 ns trajectory in all the four complexes. Yellow bars indicate the event of hydrogen bond formation as observed at that point of time at X-axis. Length of the yellow trace illustrates the occupancy or the time duration for which the respective hydrogen bond was observed.
Molecules 23 02141 g007
Molecules 23 02141 g008 550
Figure 8. Uncorrelated trajectories Analysis through essential dynamics depicted by the porcupine plot of (A) bacterial H-NOX bound BAY58-2667 (bbay58); (B) human H-NOX bound BAY58-2667 (hbay58); (C) bacterial H-NOX bound BAY60-2770 (bbay60); and (D) human H-NOX bound BAY60-2770 (hbay60) respectively. Green color porcupines represent those regions which experienceconsiderable movement. All dynamically important regions which showed changes during principle component analysis are further highlighted with arrows.
Figure 8. Uncorrelated trajectories Analysis through essential dynamics depicted by the porcupine plot of (A) bacterial H-NOX bound BAY58-2667 (bbay58); (B) human H-NOX bound BAY58-2667 (hbay58); (C) bacterial H-NOX bound BAY60-2770 (bbay60); and (D) human H-NOX bound BAY60-2770 (hbay60) respectively. Green color porcupines represent those regions which experienceconsiderable movement. All dynamically important regions which showed changes during principle component analysis are further highlighted with arrows.
Molecules 23 02141 g008
Table
Table 1. Key residues involved in the hydrogen bonding network across binding pockets of bbay60, hbay60, bbay58 and hbay58 complexes. Hydrogen bond forming atoms: acceptor, donor hydrogen and donor atoms are also listed. The occupancy of a bond-hydrogen is given as percent of MD frames reporting the bond. Average distance of each H bond is also given as measure of the bond strength.
Table 1. Key residues involved in the hydrogen bonding network across binding pockets of bbay60, hbay60, bbay58 and hbay58 complexes. Hydrogen bond forming atoms: acceptor, donor hydrogen and donor atoms are also listed. The occupancy of a bond-hydrogen is given as percent of MD frames reporting the bond. Average distance of each H bond is also given as measure of the bond strength.
ComplexesAcceptorDonor HDonorPercent of Frames of 50 ns Simulation Showing the Hydrogen BondAverage Distance Å
bbay60[email protected][email protected][email protected]24.582.88
[email protected][email protected][email protected]18.522.91
[email protected][email protected][email protected]2.242.91
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.442.83
hbay60[email protected][email protected][email protected]69.932.85
[email protected][email protected][email protected]15.272.91
[email protected][email protected][email protected]8.022.82
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.202.77
bbay58[email protected][email protected][email protected]37.432.87
[email protected][email protected][email protected]12.502.92
[email protected][email protected][email protected]2.962.91
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.102.83
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.102.81
hbay58[email protected][email protected][email protected]58.642.87
[email protected][email protected][email protected]8.592.83
[email protected][email protected][email protected]6.802.92
[email protected][email protected][email protected]1.632.81
[email protected][email protected][email protected]1.562.79
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.212.90
[email protected][email protected][email protected]0.102.89
Back to TopTop