Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Polyheterocyclic Pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyridin-5-ones via a One-Pot (Ugi-3CR/aza Diels-Alder/N-acylation/aromatization/SN2) Process. A Suitable Alternative towards Novel Aza-Analogues of Falipamil
Next Article in Special Issue
Tricycloalternarene Analogs from a Symbiotic Fungus Aspergillus sp. D and Their Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Molecular Docking Studies, In Vitro Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activities of Novel Dipeptide Derivatives Based on N-(2-(2-Hydrazinyl-2-oxoethylamino)-2-oxoethyl)-Nicotinamide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Perspectives of 8-Prenylnaringenin, a Potent Phytoestrogen from Hops
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules23040762
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors

by
Li Yang
,
Kui-Shan Wen
,
Xiao Ruan
,
Ying-Xian Zhao
,
Feng Wei
and
Qiang Wang
*
Ningbo Institute of Technology, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040762
Submission received: 11 February 2018 / Revised: 21 March 2018 / Accepted: 23 March 2018 / Published: 27 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Activity of Secondary Metabolites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant secondary metabolites (SMs) are not only a useful array of natural products but also an important part of plant defense system against pathogenic attacks and environmental stresses. With remarkable biological activities, plant SMs are increasingly used as medicine ingredients and food additives for therapeutic, aromatic and culinary purposes. Various genetic, ontogenic, morphogenetic and environmental factors can influence the biosynthesis and accumulation of SMs. According to the literature reports, for example, SMs accumulation is strongly dependent on a variety of environmental factors such as light, temperature, soil water, soil fertility and salinity, and for most plants, a change in an individual factor may alter the content of SMs even if other factors remain constant. Here, we review with emphasis how each of single factors to affect the accumulation of plant secondary metabolites, and conduct a comparative analysis of relevant natural products in the stressed and unstressed plants. Expectantly, this documentary review will outline a general picture of environmental factors responsible for fluctuation in plant SMs, provide a practical way to obtain consistent quality and high quantity of bioactive compounds in vegetation, and present some suggestions for future research and development.

1. Introduction

As distinguished from primary metabolism and first attributed to Kossel [1], plant secondary metabolism is defined as a term for pathway and small molecule products of metabolism that are non-essential for the survival of the organism. In nature, a variety of secondary metabolism pathways elicited an array of plant defensive compounds called secondary metabolites (SMs). In addition to basic nutrients such as proteins, fats or carbohydrates, plants can produce other compounds including taxoids, polysaccharides, flavones, etc. SMs are the molecules to be dispensable for plant metabolism and growth, whereas the wide variety and high diversity of secondary products are key components for plants to interact with the environment in the adaptation to both biotic and abiotic stress conditions [2,3]. In fact, secondary metabolites involved in the protection against herbivores, bacteria, fungi, viruses and even other competing plants. In addition, some plants made use of secondary metabolites as signals for communication between plants and symbiotic microorganisms, as well as served to attract pollinators and seed dispersers [3,4].
Plant SMs are usually classified according to their chemical structure [5]. Several groups of large molecules, including phenolic acids and flavonoids, terpenoids and steroids, and alkaloids have been implicated in activation and reinforcement of defense mechanisms in plants (see the classification and biosynthisis of flavonoids, alkaloids and terpenoids in plant at Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [5,6]. Due to their remarkable biological activities, plant SMs have been formerly used as important source of active traditional medicine, perfume and industrial raw materials for centuries [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Whereafter, they were widely used as valuable compounds such as pharmaceutics, cosmetics, fine chemicals, or more recently nutraceuticals [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Obviously, SMs tremendously promoted to the commercial importance and value of plants.
However, the extraction and purification of SMs from wild natural plants normally require a complex and time consuming process, and even so, the yield of the desirable end-product is often very low [20,21,22,23]. Consequently, finding practical approaches to intensify the process and enhance the yield pose a serious challenge to researchers. Up to now, many studies on searching of the highest yield plant species and optimization of culture conditions have been conducted [24,25,26,27,28], but few directly emphasized on the adaptability of plant secondary metabolites in response to environmental disturbances and stimulations. In fact, synthesis and accumulation of phytochemical components critically depended on environmental conditions. For most plants, external factors or variables (light, temperature, soil water, soil fertility and salinity) can significantly affect some processes associated with growth and development of the plants, even their ability to synthesize secondary metabolites, eventually leading to the change of overall phytochemical profiles which play a strategic role in production of bioactive substances [29,30,31]. In other words, plant secondary metabolites can be gradually generated in response to environmental stress, and hence plant secondary metabolism be viewed as plant behavior that is in part the ability of adaptation and survival in response to environment stimuli during the lifetime [32], and serve to establish ecological relationships between plants and other organisms [33]. In particular, for medicinal plants, environmental conditions are capable of redirecting the metabolism to consequently regulate the production of active constituents. Because, plants as herbal medicines have a complex and variable chemical composition, the type and amount of SMs as well as biological effects were often determined according to the change of environment.
Besides, specific SMs are synthesized only in certain circumstances, and thus, high quality medicinal plants should be raised produced only under carefully controlled environments. There are extensive literature documents on plant secondary metabolites. Here, we will focus on discussing how the yield and content of SMs can be varied with the changes in environmental and soil nutrients and agroclimatic conditions. In the following sections, the adaptability of plant SMs to key environmental factors including light irradiation (duration, intensity, quality), temperature, soil water, soil fertility and salinity will be in turn reviewed. The primary purpose of this literature commentary is to enhance our understanding of plant SM adaptability in response to environmental stresses, and then optimize cultivation techniques or ambient conditions to maximize yield of beneficial plant SM natural products in an efficient and sustainable manner.

2. Response of Plant SMs to Light Irradiation

Light is indispensable to biosynthetic course of a growing plant. The key factors related light radiation include photoperiod (duration), intensity (quantity), direction and quality (frequency or wavelength) [34,35]. In the natural world, light plays an inreplaceable role in promoting plant growth and inducing or regulating plant metabolism. In response to light radiation, plants are able to adapt to the changes of circumstances by the release and accumulation of various secondary metabolites including phenolic compounds, triterpenoids and flavonoids, and many of them, have high economic and utilization value due to the well-known antioxidant property.

2.1. Effect of Photoperiod on Plant Secondary Metabolites

Photoperiod factor would influence the growth and development of plants, and thus regulate the biosynthesis of SMs [36,37]. Early studies showed that the duration of light radiation had a predominant role in regulating the levels of various phenolic phenylpropane derivatives in the Xanthium species. In comparison with a long day of light exposure, a short day of light exposure caused a decrease of, caffeoylquinic acids by about 40% and even an approximately double reduction in the content of flavonoid aglycones [38]. Similarly, grown under short-day treatment, the content of anthocyanins in Pinus contorta seedlings grown under short sunlight was notably lower than those growing in the long sunlight area, whereas the concentration of proanthocyanins and flavan-3-ols changed little as sunshine period varied [39]. A long period (16 h) of light irradiation on leaves of Ipomoea batatas generated a dramatic increase in the content of flavonoids (anthocyanins, catechins and flavonols) and phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids) [40]. In a controllable photoperiod experiment, the analyses on chemical compositions of Vaccinium myrtillus from Northern (Lapinjarvi) and Southern (Oulu and Muhos) regions of Finland indicated that the southern clones produced the highest anthocyanin and its derivatives during a 24-h light period, and in comparison with a shorter photoperiod (12 h), longer photoperiod (24 h) also enchanced the level of chlorogenic acid [41]. In general, a long-day sunshine can increase the level of SMs in plants, and further support the role of flavonoids and phenolic acids in protecting plants to resist light exposure. The effect of photoperiod change on the content of plant secondary metabolites was illustrated in Table 1.

2.2. Effect of Light Intensity on Plant Secondary Metabolites

As a familiar indole alkaloid [42,43], the SM camptothecin can respond to environmental stresses and its accumulation rate can change with light irradiation conditions. It is known that overshadowing can induce biochemical changes in plants, particularly in leaves [44], and heavy shading of only 27% full sunlight, for example, can elevate the concentration of camptothecin in leaves of Camptotheca acuminata, whereas substantially reduce that in the lateral roots of this tree [45].
For Centella asiatica populations with high contents of secondary metabolites, qualitative and quantitative analyses show that light exposure can affect the content of bioactive triterpenes in these grasses, and under 70% shade-grown condition they contained the highest amount of asiatic acid but the lowest amounts of asiaticoside [46]. In addition, the content of flavonoids and chlorogenic acid in plants are positively correlated to the growth-lighting condition [47]. The exposure to full day sunlight resulted in an increase in contents of asiaticoside, madecassoside, flavonoids and chlorogenic acid in the plants compared with those grown under 50% of the shade [48]. These results indicate that the accumulation of triterpene and phenolic compounds in C. asiatica depends on duration and amount of daylight. The composition and antioxidant activities of phenolic compounds in Berberis microphylla were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated under different light intensities. It is found that high light intensity can increase the content of monomeric anthocyanin by three times more than that medium light intensity does. For the content of total polyphenol, however, high light intensity only gives a slight increase compared with medium light intensity. In the meantime, high light intensity can activate the higher antioxidant capacity of SMs in plants [49]. The effect of light intensity on the content of plant secondary metabolites is shown in Table 2.

2.3. Effect of Light Quality on Plant Secondary Metabolites

Light quality can also influence synthesis of bioactive compound and secondary metabolism of plants. Monochromatic light was more sensitive than combined light to improve antioxidant phenolic compound of Lactuca sativa ‘Sunmang’. The total content of antioxidant phenols decreased with increasing the proportion of red light, and each of individual phenolic compounds including chlorogenic, caffeic, chicoric and ferulic acids as well as kaempferol showed a similar behavior [50]. UV irradiation is such an important abiotic factor that in many cases stimulates the production of secondary metabolites, and hence has been applied in cell and callus culture [24,51,52]. When the cells were irradiated with UV-B, the production of catharanthine and vindoline from Catharanthus roseus was enhanced [53]. The inducing effect of a continuous UV irradiation on the anthocyanin content of Daucus carota cell cultures was investigated and revealed that the total accumulation of anthocyanin was significantly enhanced by the UV irradiation [54]. As one of the major components, flavonoids were isolated from the Cistus exudates [55,56], whereas among various environmental and physical variables, the UV irradiation was considered to be the major inducer for the enhancement of flavonoids content [56]. UV irradiation on calluses of several Passiflora species was able to increase the production of all four glycosyl flavonoids [24]. Regvar et al. [57] comparatively evaluated the effect of UV irradiation on the concentration of rutin, catechin and quercetin in Fagopyrum esculentum and F. tataricum, and found a specific increase of quercetin concentration in F. esculentum when exposed to the enhanced UV irradiation. Warren et al. [58] found that the levels of flavonoids (mainly kaempferol and quercetin) in Populus trichocarpa leaves increased in response to UV-B irradiation. Markham et al. [59] compared C-glycosylflavones content of different rice cultivar under UV-B light, and found that C-glycosylflavones were enhanced in a UV-tolerant rice cultivar but absent in a susceptible cultivar. With supplemental UV-B, significant differences in flavonols accumulation were found among T. repens populations, and quercetin glycoside levels increased by 200% on average [60]. For Hypericum perforatum, a strong correlation between rutin content and the altitude of the grown site was observed. The amount of rutin in the plants grown at an altitude of 800 m was 4-fold higher than that in the plants grown at an altitude of 200 m, and this difference was attributed to discrepancy of solar radiation levels [61]. Therefore, the adjustment of light quality at a specific growth stage should be considered as a strategic tool for improving yield of SMs. The effect of light quality on the content of plant secondary metabolites is displayed in Table 3.

3. Response of Plant SMs to Temperature

During the 20th century, the average global temperature has already increased by 0.74 °C, approximately increased by 0.2 °C per decade [62]. According to recent global climate models, the annual mean temperature in Finland and Northern Europe is predicted to be 1.2–1.5 °C higher by year 2040 [62,63]. Authoritative simulation estimates that climate warming will cause a considerable affection on the production of SMs from vegetation.
As one of the major weather variables temperature can significantly influence the composition of SMs, and in general raising temperature might almost enhance all of SMs in plant species. For instance, the composition of phenolic compounds (delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside, and myricetin-3-O-glucoside) in three Ribes nigrum cultivars demonstrated the positive correlations with temperature [64], providing the important guidelines for berry cultivation for commercial exploitation.
The modulation of temperature to alkaloids accumulation was reported, and high temperature preferable to induce the biosynthesis of alkaloids. The total accumulation of alkaloids (morphinane, phthalisoquinoline and benzylisoquinoline) in dry Papaver somniferum was restricted at low temperature [65]. In contrast, the total level of phenolic acids and isoflavonoid (genistein, daidzein and genistin) in soybean (Glycine max) roots increased after the treatment at low temperature for 24 h, and among which the highest increase of about 310% was observed in genistin after the treatment at 10 °C for 24 h, in comparison to the control [66].
High temperature incubation led to an instinct rise of 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) so that a 6-fold accumulation of HCPT in leaves of C. acuminata seedling occurred after the incubation at 40 °C for 2 h [67], indicating HCPT was involved in the defence against heat shock from the environment. For four consecutive years, higher alkaloid content in six cultivars of Lupinus angustifolius grown in field conditions was detected in 2006 with higher ambient temperature than other years [68]. Additional experiment in green house at different temperatures (10, 20 and 30 °C) also confirmed that higher temperature resulted in a higher alkaloid content [68]. The investigation on temperature affecting content of alkaloid in 60-day-old C. roseus seedlings showed that under short-term heat shock, the contents of vindoline, catharanthine and vinblastine in the seedling leaves were higher at 40 °C than those at 30 °C. More specifically, catharanthine content was increased by 40% after incubation at 40 °C for 2 h, while increased slowly at 30 °C and reached the highest value at 6 h, and in a long-term experiment at 35 °C, the concentrations of monomeric alkaloids catharanthine and vindoline showed a sharp increase [69]. When C. roseus leaves were exposed to low temperature, nearly 2-fold and 2–4 folds reduction in levels of catharanthine and vindoline were observed, respectively [70]. Besides, the concentrations of total piperidine alkaloids and two individual piperidine alkaloids in needles of 1-year-old Norway spruce exposed to high temperature were significantly higher than those in the needles under ambient temperature. Moreover, elevating temperature resulted in a decrease in the amounts of total flavonoids in bark as well as total catechins and total acetophenones in needles [71]. Overall, the regulation of alkaloids metabolism suggested that low temperature attenuated the regulation of most alkaloids biosynthetic pathway genes [70].
In recent years, the correlation between terpenoid yield and temperature were investigated for deciduous and coniferous vegetation species. The capacity for isoprene emission of Quercus rubra and Q. alba in warm conditions was twice that in cold conditions [72]. Analysis of most terpenes in D. carota root showed increasing values with increasing temperature, except that only α-terpinolene decreased significantly with increasing temperature [73]. In D. carota, high content of terpenes can initiate a strong bitterness to be unpleasant to the consumers, and thus it was necessary to avoid the high growth temperature for the tasty carrots. The emission of sesquiterpene compounds (SQTs) from seven pine species had a strong temperature dependency, in which the emission of β-caryophyllene, α-bergamotene, α-farnesene, and β-farnesene increased exponentially with temperature [74]. Also, the influence of night-time warming on the emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in birch (Betula pendula) and aspen (P. tremula) was investigated. In the case of B. pendula, the emissions of the C11 homoterpene 4,8-dimethy1-nona-1,3,7-triene (DMNT) and several sesquiterpenes except 3,7-guaiadiene were consistently increased with increasing night-time temperature (6–22 °C); nearly 100-fold increase in DMNT level was estimated in the birch exposed to 22 °C compared with that exposed to 6 °C; and total SQT emissions showed a very significant increase in higher temperatures of 18–22 °C. In the case of P. tremula, both DMNT and non-terpenes (NTs) were consistently increased from 6 to 14 °C, the total SQT emissions showed significant increase in the range of 6–18 °C, and the emission of total monoterpene and sesquiterpene reached a peak value at 18 °C [75]. In addition, an exponential increase with increasing temperature was observed in the emissions of many oxygenated monoterpenes except (E)-β-farnesene in Norway spruce (Picea abies), and besides there was no temperature effect on the total terpenoid emissions [76,77].
Elevation of temperature has been also confirmed to reduce the concentration of SMs in plants. Anthocyanin content in leaf sheaths of Zea mays seedlings increased with the severity and duration of cold, due to the induction of anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway genes [78]. Similarly, low temperature induced anthocyanin accumulation in leaves and stems of Arabidopsis thaliana, and facilitated anthocyanin synthesis through the phenylpropanoid pathway associated with increased transcripts of flavonoid biosynthetic genes including phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and chalcone synthase (CHS) [79].
On the contrary, high temperature (35 °C) reduced the total anthocyanin content of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon to less than half of that in the control berries (25 °C), as a result of anthocyanin degradation and the inhibition of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes transcription [80]. Moreover, in various plants such as Petunia hybrid [81], Citrus sinensis [82], Rosa hybrida [83], the anthocyanin accumulation was induced by low temperature and inhibited by high temperature. The effect of temperature on the content of plant secondary metabolites was shown in Table 4.

4. Response of Plant SMs to Soil Water

Water stress is one of the most important environmental stresses that can regulate the morphological growth and development of plants, and alter their biochemical properties [84,85]. Severe water deficit has been considered to reduce the plants growth, but several studies have demonstrated that water stress may be possible to increase the amount of SMs in a wide variety of plant species.
In a wide range of experiments, it was indicated that when exposed to drought stress plants indeed accumulate higher concentrations of SMs. Nogués et al. [86] showed that for Pisum sativum cv. Meteor, the concentration of flavonoid in the plants suffered drought was increased by 45%, and also anthocyanin significantly increased by drought stress compared with the well-watered controls. In Rhodiola sachalinensis, maximal yield and content of salidroside were reached under the relative soil moisture of 55–75% [87]. Due to the vasoactive properties of Crataegus, its polyphenolic constituents have been attracting more and more attention. Two species of Crataegus (C. laevigata and C. monogyna) were subjected to water deficit (continuous water deprivation) and surplus (roots immersed in water) circumstances to assess the effects of water stress on levels of polyphenolics in them, which revealed that deficient water stress would induce the increases in contents of chlorogenic acid, catechin, and (−)-epicatechin, but superfluous water cause no net increases in the contents and in some cases, even a decrease in levels of polyphenolics [88]. Castellarin et al. [89] reported that the biosynthesis of anthocyanin in ripening fruit was strongly up-regulated by drought stress. Water deficit can also enhance the production of flavonoids in cell suspension culture of Glycyrrhiza inflata Batal [90]. The effect of drought stress on the concentration of active compounds in roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza was analyzed by Liu et al. [91], who found a massive increase in all analyzed compounds except for rosmarinic acid, and among them, the levels of tanshinones increased at a most in severe drought (SD) condition, including that the tanshinone I increased by 182%, and tanshinone IIA even increased by 322% in comparison with an increase of 148% in medium drought (MD) situation. Similar to tanshinone, the increase trend of cryptotanshinone due to SD stress was also observed. In recent years, several studies have focused on the molecular mechanism of secondary metabolism in response to abiotic stresses. The activation of genes involved in secondary metabolism and biosynthesis of phenolics. For example, Lettuce (L. sativa) plants through water stress can activate PAL gene participating in the biosynthesis of various phenolics and flavonoids [92]. Yuan et al. [93] reported that water deficit enhanced the expression of several flavonoids biosynthesis genes in Scutellaria baicalensis Georigi roots. Over-expression of AmDEL gene from Antirrhinum majus, resulting in both peel and flesh of fruit with intense purple colouration, significantly increased flavonoids accumulation [94]. The over-expression of AmDEL to Arabidopsis plants and WT plants were incubated for 4 weeks under drought stress to evaluate the plant response, indicating that the content of total flavonoids was significantly increased in the tolerant transgenic plants compared to WT plants [95].
As an indole alkaloid to be concentrated in seedlings of C. acuminate, camptothecin was inducible by progressive drought stress [96]. The influence of drought stress on the content of alkaloid in P. somniferum was determined after 5 days of cutting off water supply. The comparison to the control group demonstrated that three sorts of alkaloids (narkotine, morphine, codeine) emerged, and the peaks of narkotine and morphine became higher after a short period [97]. As compared with the unstressed control plants, the accumulation of total alkaloids in both shoot and root of C. roseus significantly increased under the oxidative stress due to drought [98]. The content of glycine betaine (GB) in C. roseus plants increased due to drought, because the drought stress can induce GB synthesis by over-expression of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase, suggesting that this osmolyte played an important role in protecting plant cell mechanism under condition of drought [98].
In conifer species P. sylvestris and P. abies, total monoterpenes and resin acids in the seedlings of P. sylvestris suffering from severe drought were 39% and 32% higher than the controls, and they in P. abies seedlings experiencing severe drought were 35% and 45% higher [99]. Up to now, however, the few studies have been carried out on the effect of abiotic stresses on primary and secondary metabolism of S. officinalis. Among them, only two investigations have involved the effect of water deficit on this species. In the first study, Bettaieb et al. [100] reported the effect of drought on fatty acids and essential oil composition, and in the second one, Munné-Bosch et al. [101] evaluated the effect of this stress on diterpenes and tocopherols. S. officinalis under 70% of the optimal water supply revealed the contents of monoterpenes about 33% higher than those of plants cultivated under wellwatered conditions [102]. Moreover, the amount of terpenoidphytoalexins in roots of maize (Z. mays) experiencing the decline of subterranean volumetric water content (VWC) and salt stress was analyzed. In general, higher quantities of zealexins and kauralexins were contained in roots exposed to lower water content. The root tissues stressed by 30% VWC had zealexins 4-fold more than those of the control with 60% VWC. And the kauralexins content significantly increased by 2.2-fold under more modest drought conditions [103]. Correspondingly, the quantity of phytoalexins gradually accumulated as drought day continued, but plant vigour appeared to descend throughout the time course. After 5 days of drought (one-third of the VWC remained), the contents of both zealexin and kauralexin were significantly induced to elevate by three- and four-fold respectively, and continued to rise as drought persisted [103]. In a study of C. asiatica, the variation of asiaticoside and madecassoside contents were reported for different environmental conditions. As humidity and temperature elevated, samples exhibited the highest content of both asiaticoside and total triterpenes [104]. Another study reported the content of asiaticoside was higher during the rainy season and lower during the dry season [105]. More vividly, the effect of soil water on the content of plant secondary metabolites is displayed in Table 5.

5. Response of Plant SMs to Soil Salinity

As one of the most brutal abiotic stresses, salt stress restricted the profitable production of natural products. In the world-wide, the area of the highly salinized lands has been increased to exceed 800 million hectares [106]. Salinization can induce complex interactions among various morphological, physiological and biochemical processes [107,108,109]. Also, Salinization may cause the oxidative stress due to high production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) so as to alter plant metabolism. In fact, plants produce a large number of SMs to scaveng or detoxify ROS.
In duration of Aegiceras corniculatum treated by 250 mM NaCl, polyphenol content significantly increased more than double as compared to control plants, suggesting that the accumulation of polyphenols played a role as protective metabolites [110]. In two Tunisian accessions of Cakile maritima (Jerba and Tabarka), the accumulation of polyphenols in Jerba was significantly increased by 56% and 30% in response to the treatment of 100 mM and 400 mM NaCl respectively, while that in Tabarka declined due to the NaCl treament [111]. After the treatment with moderate salinity (25–50 mM NaCl), the phenolic content in leaf of Cynara cardunculus was dramatically enhanced to reach the peak value corresponding to NaCl concentration of 50 mM [112]. The stresses of various salinity resulted in the accumulation of phenolic compounds in F. esculentum to be 57%, 121% and 153%, higher than that of the control treated with 10, 50, and 100 mM for 7 d, respectively. Moreover, the accumulation of phenolic compounds was primarily caused by an increase in the contents of four major compounds including isoorientin, orientin, rutin and vitexin [113]. The increasing salinity was also found to stimulate the biosynthesis of phenols and oleuropein in four olive cultivars, especially in leaves. The increase of total phenols content was abrupt at 125 mM NaCl which was more than double to that of control plants occurred in all cultivars. Due to the highest salinity treatment the concentration of Oleuropein was 18.5, 5.5, 2.5 and 3.8 folds greater than those of the control plants for ‘Zard’, ‘Ascolana’, ‘Koroneiki’ and ‘Arbequina’, respectively. However, the variation trend of leaf hydroxytyrosol concentration was different from that of oleuropein. When exposed to 125 mM NaCl, the hydroxytyrosol in each one of the all cultivars decreased abruptly below the values of the control plants [114]. Among three chloride salts (NaCl, KCl and CaCl2), KCltreatment showed a more pronounced effect on the contents of total phenolics and flavonoids in leaves of artichoke (C. cardunculus) and cardoon (C. cardunculus var. altilis) [115]. Moreover, the rapeseed (Brassica napus var oleifera) under increasing salinity was sprouted to evaluate the effect of salinity on total phenolics (TP), non-flavonoids (NF), tannins (TAN), phenolic acids (PAs). In early sprouts, TP increased by 35% with salinity up to 50 mM NaCl, as compared with control and then decreased slightly, the maximum increase of total-NF (30%) was showed in corresponding to the treatment of 25 mM NaCl, and total-TAN increased with salt concentration up to 50 mM and remained such high in response to the treatment of 100 and 200 mM NaCl, while salinity did not give a clear effect on total-Pas content. Overall, a moderate salinity in 25–50 mM NaCl caused the highest relative increase in phenolic concentration [116]. However, the accumulation of phenolic compounds in plants by salinity stress would also depend on the plant species, so that phenolic compounds failed to be accumulated in some plant species. With respect to the control plants, salinity stressed also led to a decrease of phenolic compounds (chlorogenic and sinapic acid derivatives and flavonoids) in leaves of broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica cv. Marathon) and the loss was higher for flavonoids than for sinapic acid derivates [117]. Furthermore, salinity stress can change the chemical contents of various phenolic compounds in rice cultivars (tolerant and susceptible varieties), causing a large increase in total phenolics and the content of vanillin and protocatechuic acid in tolerant varieties, whereas in contrast, a markedly reduce is found in the susceptible cultivar [118]. The effect of NaCl concentration on total phenolic content in S. macrosiphon showed that all the treatments with different concentration of NaCl elicited a remarkable reduction of total phenolic content in the leaf which decreased with the treatment of increasing NaCl concentration. After induced with 6.8 dS m−1 NaCl, the content of total phenolics was reduced by 2.6 times as compared to control leaves [118]. However, NaCl salinity increased total antioxidant activity in methanolic extract of the leaf, probably due to the increasing activity of peroxidase (POD) under salt stress conditions [119].
Jaleel et al. [98] reported that the content of indole alkaloidin C. roseus increased due to the treatment of 80 mM NaCl as compared to unstressed control plants. After C. roseus treated with 150 mM NaCl for 2 months, the content of vincristine in this plant significantly increased as compared with the control sample, but declined with further increasing salinity in a long-term treatment [120]. The yields of alkaloids in C. roseus increased gradually with the duration of seawater stress, and the plants treated by 5% seawater gave the yields of alkaloids higher than those treated by 10% seawater. Among the four kinds of alkaloids, the concentration of vindoline, catharanthine and vincristine in the plants treated by 5% seawater significantly increased as compared to the control. In consideration of industrial production, the treatments using 5% seawater can potentially reduce the cost of producing alkaloids [121]. In the medium of salinity equivalent to 100 mM NaCl, the accumulation of total alkaloids exceeded over that of non-saline control, and found to be maximal in roots of C. roseus [122].
Similarly, salinization can significantly alter the accumulation of secondary metabolite of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), mainly inducing a pronounced effect on monoterpenes composition. It was founded that the solution of NaCl at 100 mM considerably increased the relative abundance of cineole and camphor, but slightly decreased those of borneol, α-terpineol, nopol, and camphene [123]. Moreover, the root tissues of maize exposed to salt stress can also increase the concentrations of acidic terpenoid phytoalexins, such that the immersion of the root tissues in the solution of NaCl at 500 mM dramedically enhance the quantity of zealexins by about five fold, while the treatment with lower concentration solution of NaCl (100 mM) significantly induce the content of kauralexins to raise by twofold in comparison with the control plants in the medium of 0 mM NaCl [103]. The effect of salinity stress on the content of plant secondary metabolites is exhibited in Table 6.

6. Response of Plant SMs to Soil Fertility

Supplemental plant mineral nutrition may provide a means not only to stimulate plant growth but also influence the content of SMs. Increasing studies have disclosed that the availability of plant nutrients can be an important factor in determining secondary metabolism and antioxidant activity within plants. Unfortunately, it should be mentioned that most fertilizers used in these studies were generally highly water-soluble simple fertilizers consisting of only one or two elements of N, P, or K, and therefore, inconsistent results have been reported.
A large number of experiments have been proposed that nutrient deficiencies of plants is characterized by an accumulation of flavonoids, notably the anthocyanins. The inverse relationship between the availability of both nitrogen and phosphate availability and the content of flavonol in Arabidopsis and tomato seedling tissues was noted to be highly significant, and the concentration of quercetin, kaempferol and isorhamnetin was increased in response to either nitrogen or phosphate stress in both species [124]. Ibrahim et al. [125] found that nitrogen levels had a significant impact on the production of total phenolics and flavonoids in Labisia pumila Benth. As more nitrogen was invested steadily from 0 to 270 kg N ha−1 soil, less amount of phenolics and flavonoids was produced. The fertilizer at ratio of N:P:K = 1:0.6:1.2 can reduce the flavonoid content but increased polyphenol content in B. microphylla. Moreover, the antioxidant activities were slightly increased with the increment of fertilizing amount [49]. In the leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) with N-dedicient rhizosphere condition, anthocyanins and one of flavonols consistently increased by 2- to 3-fold, while total non-anthocyanin flavonoids increased by 14% only, comparable to wild type plants. In addition, N-deficiency stress can also induce different effects on expression of genes encoding flavonoid biosynthetic enzymes, so that mRNA levels for chalcone synthase (CHS) and dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) increased while mRNA levels of a chalcone isomerase—homologous band (CHI) decreased in response to N stress [126]. As compared with the availability of fertilization, only nitrogen-free fertilization allowed to obtain the highest total polyphenols content and can exert a positive anti-radical activity and allowed to obtain the highest content of total polyphenols, although were not accompanied by an increase in terms of the main phenolic compounds [127,128].
Nutrient deficiencies in soil can affect the alkaloid concentration in seed of lupin (L. angustifolius). Under the condition of severe potassium deficiency, the alkaloid concentrations in the seeds of sweet varieties of lupins drastically increased by 205%. Over the range of K content from 0 to 240 mg kg−1 soil, lupanine was the predominant alkaloid in sweet varieties, whereas 13-hydroxylupanine prevailed in bitter variety [129]. Conversely, nitrogenous fertilizers significantly increased the content of alkaloids by 9–17%, and the greatest increase was found when NH4NO3 was applied [130]. Similar pattern of alkaloids in response to nitrogen supplement was also initiated in L. albus [131]. Simultaneous application of magnesium and nitrogen decreased the content of alkaloids in seeds [130]. The effect of Sangral compound fertilizer at rates of 0–800 kg ha−1 on the content of alkaloid in Datura innoxia plants was also investigated, indicating that the content of total alkaloids content increased with increasing the fertilization rate, reached a peak value at 600 kg ha−1, and then decreased at 800 kg ha−1 [132].
Owing to the application of the high concentration of ammonium nitrate fertilizer, Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) showed the increasing of monoterpenoid concentrations [133]. Compared with the high fertilizing amount of 400 mg, the application of 200 mg N-fertilizer increased the concentration of monoterpenoid in Thuja plicata during the active growing season (August), and when plant growth began to subside by September, however, the high fertilizing amount generated higher monoterpenoid concentration [134] as additional nutrient sources shifted toward terpenoid synthesis [135]. More intuitively, the effect of soil fertility on the content of plant secondary metabolites is showi in Table 7.

7. Conclusions

Plant adaptability to environmental stresses is a widespread ecological behavior in Nature. As a phenotypic and explicit behavior, plant morphological adaptability to environment is relatively easy to observe and recognize, while as an intrinsic and implicit behavior, plant biochemical adaptability is relatively hard to discover and not fully understood yet. Based on the relevant literature reports and data, the above review focuses on the response of important plant secondary metabolites such as phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids and alkaloids produced from various biochemical processes to crucial environmental stresses, including light irradiation, temperature, soil water, soil fertility and salinity, etc.
Here, we have provided a great deal of evidence to demonstrate the diversified and changeable responses of various plant secondary metabolites to different environmental stresses, What’s more interesting is that the individual environmental stress can selectively enhance the content of several SMs in plants. Thus it can be deduced that the synthesis of some natural products can be altered by diverse abiotic factors. As well known, some SMs have found commercial applications as drugs, flavours, fragrances, insecticides, etc. Such fine chemicals are extracted and purified from plant materials, but their production is often dependent on the physiological and developmental stage of the plant, and normally their content is too low to meet the requirements in the market of health care products, so the optimization of plant growth conditions to improve the concentrations of high value SMs becomes crucial and essential. This documentary analysis has suggested a theoretical basis to obtain consistent and high levels of SMs from plants. Prospectively, the use of environmental stresses may provide a potential and profitable way to increase the accumulation of bioactive compounds, improve quality, and reduce over-harvesting pressures of medicinal plants.
Despite this review focused on the adaptability of secondary plant products in response to each individual environmental factor, the actual synthesis and accumulation of various SMs were frequently induced and/or modulated by a number of environmental factors simultaneously [41,49,71,136,137,138]. In other words, an individual factor can generally interact with other factors (e.g., a high irradiation is frequently accompanied with elevated temperature and water deficiency) Thus, we must further investigate and understand a synergistic effects of multiple environmental factors on plant secondary metabolism.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Project No. 31670631), and Department of Science and Technology of Ningbo (DSTNB, Project No. 2017C110004, 2017C10017, 2017C10070) for the financial support of the work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the manuscript: Qiang Wang. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Li Yang, Kui-Shan Wen, Xiao Ruan, Ying-Xian Zhao, Feng Wei, Qiang Wang.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kossel, A. Ueber die chemische Zusammensetzung der Zelle. Archiv für physiologie 1891, 4, 181–186. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, R.N.; Wallsgrove, R.M. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol. 1994, 127, 617–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wink, M. Evolution of secondary plant metabolism. eLS 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wink, M. Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Harborne, J.B. Classes and functions of secondary products from plants. In Chemicals from Plants, Perspectives on Secondary Plant Products; Walton, N.J., Brown, D.E., Eds.; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 1999; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourgaud, F.; Gravot, A.; Milesi, S.; Gontier, E. Production of plant secondary metabolites: A historical perspective. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 839–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balandrin, M.F.; Klocke, J.A.; Wurtele, E.S.; Bollinger, W.H. Natural plant chemicals: sources of industrial and medicinal materials. Science 1985, 228, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bates, D.M. Plant utilization: Patterns and prospects. Econ. Bot. 1985, 39, 241–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Balandrin, M.F.; Klocke, J.A. Medicinal, aromatic, and industrial materials from plants. In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants I; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  10. Asada, M.; Shuler, M.L. Stimulation of ajmalicine production and excretion from Catharanthus roseus: Effects of adsorption in situ, elicitors and alginate immobilization. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 1989, 30, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ammon, H.P.; Wahl, M.A. Pharmacology of Curcuma longa. Planta Med. 1991, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Horwitz, S.B. Mechanism of action of taxol. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1992, 13, 134–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Parke, D.V.; Rahman, H. The effects of some terpenoids and other dietary anutrients on hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes. Biochem. J. 1969, 113, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Markman, M.; Mekhail, T.M. Paclitaxel in cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2002, 3, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pant, B.; Manandhar, S. In vitro propagation of carrot (Daucus carota) L. Sci. World 2007, 5, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
  16. Koul, O.; Walia, S.; Dhaliwal, G.S. Essential oils as green pesticides: Potential and constraints. Biopestic. Int. 2008, 4, 63–84. [Google Scholar]
  17. Qu, C.; Chen, Z. Antitumor effect of water decoctions of taxus cuspidate on pancreatic cancer. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2014, 291675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zheng, Z.Q.; Fu, Y.Y.; Li, B.H.; Zhang, M.L.; Yang, X.L.; Xin, C.W.; Huang, P. PSY-1, a Taxus chinensis var. mairei extract, inhibits cancer cell metastasis by interfering with MMPs. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. El-Khattouti, A.; Selimovic, D.; Haïkel, Y.; Megahed, M.; Gomez, C.R.; Hassan, M. Identification and analysis of CD133+ melanoma stem-like cells conferring resistance to taxol: An insight into the mechanisms of their resistance and response. Cancer Lett. 2014, 343, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Liu, B.; Guo, F.; Chang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Q. Optimization of extraction of evodiamine and rutaecarpine from fruit of Evodia rutaecarpa using modified supercritical CO2. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 7833–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ruan, X.; Li, Z.H.; Wang, Q.; Pan, C.D.; Jiang, D.A.; Wang, G.G. Autotoxicity and allelopathy of 3, 4-dihydroxyacetophenone isolated from Picea schrenkiana needles. Molecules 2011, 16, 8874–8893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ruan, X.; Yan, L.Y.; Li, X.X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q. Optimization of process parameters of extraction of amentoflavone, quercetin and ginkgetin from Taxus chinensis using supercritical CO2 plus co-solvent. Molecules 2014, 19, 17682–17696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ruan, X.; Yang, L.; Cui, W.X.; Zhang, M.X.; Li, Z.H.; Liu, B.; Wang, Q. Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of total alkaloids, peimisine, peimine and peiminine from the bulb of Fritillaria thunbergii Miq, and evaluation of antioxidant activities of the extracts. Materials 2016, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Antognoni, F.; Zheng, S.; Pagnucco, C.; Baraldi, R.; Poli, F.; Biondi, S. Induction of flavonoid production by UV-B radiation in Passiflora quadrangularis callus cultures. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bertolucci, S.K.V.; Pereira, A.B.D.; Pinto, J.E.B.; Oliveira, A.B.; Braga, F.C. Seasonal variation on the contents of coumarin and kaurane-type diterpenes in Mikania laevigata and M. glomerata leaves under different shade levels. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Guo, J.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, H.; Xie, F. Metabolic profiling of chinese tobacco leaf of different geographical origins by GC-MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2597–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Talhaoui, N.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Roldán, C.; León, L.; De la Rosa, R.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A. Chemometric analysis for the evaluation of phenolic patterns in olive leaves from six cultivars at different growth stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1722–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, L.; Zheng, Z.S.; Cheng, F.; Ruan, X.; Jiang, D.A.; Pan, C.D.; Wang, Q. Seasonal dynamics of metabolites in needles of Taxus wallichiana var. mairei. Molecules 2016, 21, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Verma, N.; Shukla, S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2015, 2, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferrandino, A.; Lovisolo, C. Abiotic stress effects on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Focus on abscisic acid-mediated consequences on secondary metabolism and berry quality. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Griesser, M.; Weingart, G.; Schoedl-Hummel, K.; Neumann, N.; Becker, M.; Varmuza, K.; Liebner, F.; Schuhmacher, R.; Forneck, A. Severe drought stress is affecting selected primary metabolites, polyphenols, and volatile metabolites in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 88, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Metlen, K.L.; Aschehoug, E.T.; Callaway, R.M. Plant behavioural ecology: Dynamic plasticity in secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Musilova, L.; Ridl, J.; Polivkova, M.; Macek, T.; Uhlik, O. Effects of secondary plant metabolites on microbial populations: changes in community structure and metabolic activity in contaminated environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Carvalho, R.F.; Takaki, M.; Azevedo, R.A. Plant pigments: The many faces of light perception. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zoratti, L.; Karppinen, K.; Escobar, A.L.; Häggman, H.; Jaakola, L. Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jaakola, L.; Hohtola, A. Effect of latitude on flavonoid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, B.; Zheng, J.; Laaksonen, O.; Tahvonen, R.; Kallio, H. Effects of latitude and weather conditions on phenolic compounds in currant (Ribes spp.) cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3517–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Taylor, A.O. Some effects of photoperiod on the biosynthesis of phenylpropane derivatives in Xanthium. Plant Physiol. 1965, 40, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Camm, E.L.; McCallum, J.; Leaf, E.; Koupai-abyazani, M.R. Cold-induced purpling of Pinus contorta seedlings depends on previous daylength treatment. Plant Cell Environ. 1993, 16, 761–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carvalho, I.S.; Cavaco, T.; Carvalho, L.M.; Duque, P. Effect of photoperiod on flavonoid pathway activity in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) leaves. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Uleberg, E.; Rohloff, J.; Jaakola, L.; Trôst, K.; Junttila, O.; Häggman, H.; Martinussen, I. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on yield and chemical composition of northern and southern clones of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 10406–10414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hashimoto, T.; Yamada, Y. Alkaloid biogenesis: Molecular aspects. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1994, 45, 257–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vincent, R.M.; Lopez-Meyer, M.; McKnight, T.D.; Nessler, C.L. Sustained harvest of camptothecin from the leaves of Camptotheca acuminata. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 618–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gottschalk, K.W. Shade, leaf growth and crown development of quercus rubra, quercus velutina, prunus serotina and acer rubrum seedlings. Tree Physiol. 1994, 14, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, Z.; Carpenter, S.B.; Constantin, R.J. Camptothecin production in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings in response to shading and flooding. Can. J. Bot. 1997, 75, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Devkota, A.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Comai, S.; Innocenti, G.; Jha, P.K. Centella asiatica (L.) urban from Nepal: Quali-quantitative analysis of samples from several sites, and selection of high terpene containing populations for cultivation. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alqahtani, A.; Tongkao-on, W.; Li, K.M.; Razmovski-Naumovski, V.; Chan, K.; Li, G.Q. Seasonal variation of triterpenes and phenolic compounds in Australian Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. Phytochem. Anal. 2015, 26, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Khatib, A.; Shaari, K.; Abas, F.; Shitan, M.; Kneer, R.; Neto, V.; Lajis, N.H. Discrimination of three pegaga (Centella) varieties and determination of growth-lighting effects on metabolites content based on the chemometry of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 60, 410–417. [Google Scholar]
  49. Arena, M.E.; Postemsky, P.D.; Curvetto, N.R. Changes in the phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Berberis microphylla G. Forst. berries in relation to light intensity and fertilization. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 218, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kliewer, W.M. Influence of temperature, solar radiation and nitrogen on coloration and composition of Emperor grapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977, 28, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  51. Broeckling, C.D.; Huhman, D.V.; Farag, M.A.; Smith, J.T.; May, G.D.; Mendes, P.; Dixon, R.A.; Sumner, L.W. Metabolic profiling of Medicago truncatula cell cultures reveals the effects of biotic and abiotic elicitors on metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 56, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ku, K.L.; Chang, P.S.; Cheng, Y.C.; Lien, C.Y. Production of stilbenoids from the callus of Arachis hypogaea: A novel source of the anticancer compound piceatannol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 3877–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ramani, S.; Jayabaskaran, C. Enhanced catharanthine and vindoline production in suspension cultures of Catharanthus roseus by ultraviolet-B light. J. Mol. Signal. 2008, 3, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gläßgen, W.E.; Rose, A.; Madlung, J.; Koch, W.; Gleitz, J.; Seitz, H.U. Regulation of enzymes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in carrot cell cultures in response to treatment with ultraviolet light and fungal elicitors. Planta 1998, 204, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vogt, T.; Proksch, P.; Gülz, P.G. Epicuticular flavonoid aglycones in the genus Cistus, Cistaceae. J. Plant Physiol. 1987, 131, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chaves, N.; Escudero, J.C.; Gutierrez-Merino, C. Role of ecological variables in the seasonal variation of flavonoid content of Cistus ladanifer exudate. J. Chem. Ecol. 1997, 23, 579–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Regvar, M.; Bukovnik, U.; Likar, M.; Kreft, I. UV-B radiation affects flavonoids and fungal colonisation in Fagopyrum esculentum and F. tataricum. Open Life Sci. 2012, 7, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Warren, J.M.; Bassman, J.H.; Fellman, J.K.; Mattinson, D.S.; Eigenbrode, S. Ultraviolet-B radiation alters phenolic salicylate and flavonoid composition of Populus trichocarpa leaves. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Markham, K.R.; Tanner, G.J.; Caasi-Lit, M.; Whitecross, M.I.; Nayudu, M.; Mitchell, K.A. Possible protective role for 3′, 4′-dihydroxyflavones induced by enhanced UV-B in a UV-tolerant rice cultivar. Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1913–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hofmann, R.W.; Swinny, E.E.; Bloor, S.J.; Markham, K.R.; Ryan, K.G.; Campbell, B.D.; Jordan, B.R.; Fountain, D.W. Responses of nine Trifolium repens L. populations to ultraviolet-B radiation: Differential flavonol glycoside accumulation and biomass production. Ann. Bot. 2000, 86, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Umek, A.; Kreft, S.; Kartnig, T.; Heydel, B. Quantitative phytochemical analyses of six Hypericum species growing in Slovenia. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Valencia. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf (accessed on 12–17 November 2007).
  63. Jylhä, K.; Ruosteenoja, K.; Räisänen, J.; Venäläinen, A.; Tuomenvirta, H.; Ruokolainen, L.; Saku, S.; Seitola, T. The changing climate in Finland: Estimates for adaptation studies. ACCLIM Project Rep. 2009, 4, 102. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zheng, J.; Yang, B.; Ruusunen, V.; Laaksonen, O.; Tahvonen, R.; Hellsten, J.; Kallio, H. Compositional differences of phenolic compounds between black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars and their response to latitude and weather conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6581–6593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bernáth, J.; Tétényi, P. The Effect of environmental factors on growth. Development and alkaloid production of Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.): I. Responses to day-length and light intensity. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 1979, 174, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Janas, K.M.; Cvikrová, M.; Pałagiewicz, A.; Szafranska, K.; Posmyk, M.M. Constitutive elevated accumulation of phenylpropanoids in soybean roots at low temperature. Plant Sci. 2002, 163, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zu, Y.G.; Tang, Z.H.; Yu, J.H.; Liu, S.G.; Wang, W.; Guo, X.R. Different responses of camptothecin and 10-hydroxycamptothecin to heat shock in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. Acta Bot. Sin. 2003, 45, 809–814. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jansen, G.; Jürgens, H.U.; Ordon, F. Effects of temperature on the alkaloid content of seeds of Lupinus angustifolius cultivars. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 2009, 195, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guo, X.R.; Yang, L.; Yu, J.H.; Tang, Z.H.; Zu, Y.G. Alkaloid variations in Catharanthus roseus seedlings treated by different temperatures in short term and long term. J. For. Res. 2007, 18, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dutta, A.; Sen, J.; Deswal, R. Downregulation of terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthetic pathway by low temperature and cloning of a AP2 type C-repeat binding factor (CBF) from Catharanthus roseus (L). G. Don. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1869–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Virjamo, V.; Sutinen, S.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Combined effect of elevated UVB, elevated temperature and fertilization on growth, needle structure and phytochemistry of young Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 2252–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hanson, D.T.; Sharkey, T.D. Effect of growth conditions on isoprene emission and other thermotolerance-enhancing compounds. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rosenfeld, H.J.; Aaby, K.; Lea, P. Influence of temperature and plant density on sensory quality and volatile terpenoids of carrot (Daucus carota L.) root. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 1384–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Helmig, D.; Ortega, J.; Duhl, T.; Tanner, D.; Guenther, A.; Harley, P.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Milford, J.; Sakulyanontvittaya, T. Sesquiterpene emissions from pine trees-identifications, emission rates and flux estimates for the contiguous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 1545–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ibrahim, M.A.; Mäenpää, M.; Hassinen, V.; Kontunen-Soppela, S.; Malec, L.; Rousi, M.; Pietikainen, L.; Tervahauta, A.; Karenlampi, S.; Holopainen, J.K.; et al. Elevation of night-time temperature increases terpenoid emissions from Betula pendula and Populus tremula. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 1583–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Filella, I.; Wilkinson, M.J.; Llusia, J.; Hewitt, C.N.; Peñuelas, J. Volatile organic compounds emissions in Norway spruce (Picea abies) in response to temperature changes. Physiol. Plant. 2007, 130, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kivimaenpaa, M.; Riikonen, J.; Ahonen, V.; Tervahauta, A.; Holopainen, T. Sensitivity of Norway spruce physiology and terpenoid emission dynamics to elevated ozone and elevated temperature under open-field exposure. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 90, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Christie, P.J.; Alfenito, M.R.; Walbot, V. Impact of low-temperature stress on general phenylpropanoid and anthocyanin pathways: Enhancement of transcript abundance and anthocyanin pigmentation in maize seedlings. Planta 1994, 194, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Leyva, A.; Jarillo, J.A.; Salinas, J.; Martinez-Zapater, J.M. Low temperature induces the accumulation of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and chalcone synthase mRNAs of Arabidopsis thaliana in a light-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mori, K.; Yamamoto, N.G.; Kitayama, M.; Hashizume, K. Loss of anthocyanins in red-wine grape under high temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1935–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shvarts, M.; Borochov, A.; Weiss, D. Low temperature enhances petunia flower pigmentation and induces chalcone synthase gene expression. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 99, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lo Piero, A.R.; Puglisi, I.; Rapisarda, P.; Petrone, G. Anthocyanins accumulation and related gene expression in red orange fruit induced by low temperature storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9083–9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dela, G.; Or, E.; Ovadia, R.; Nissim-Levi, A.; Weiss, D.; Oren-Shamir, M. Changes in anthocyanin concentration and composition in ‘Jaguar’ rose flowers due to transient high-temperature conditions. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zobayed, S.M.A.; Afreen, F.; Kozai, T. Phytochemical and physiological changes in the leaves of St. John’s wort plants under a water stress condition. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhu, Z.; Liang, Z.; Han, R.; Wang, X. Impact of fertilization on drought response in the medicinal herb Bupleurum chinense DC: Growth and saikosaponin production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 29, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Nogués, S.; Allen, D.J.; Morison, J.I.; Baker, N.R. Ultraviolet-B radiation effects on water relations, leaf development, and photosynthesis in droughted pea plants. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Shang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X. Effect of soil moisture on growth and root-salidroside content in Rhodiola sachalinensis. Plant Physiol. Commun. 2002, 39, 335–336. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kirakosyan, A.; Kaufman, P.; Warber, S.; Zick, S.; Aaronson, K.; Bolling, S.; Chul Chang, S. Applied environmental stresses to enhance the levels of polyphenolics in leaves of hawthorn plants. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 121, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Castellarin, S.D.; Matthews, M.A.; Di Gaspero, G.; Gambetta, G.A. Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries. Planta 2007, 227, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yang, Y.; He, F.; Yu, L.; Chen, X.; Lei, J.; Ji, J. Influence of drought on oxidative stress and flavonoid production in cell suspension culture of Glycyrrhiza inflata Batal. Z. Naturforsch. C 2007, 62, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Zou, Z.; Liang, Z. Effect of drought stress on growth and ccumulation of active constituents in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oh, M.M.; Trick, H.N.; Rajashekar, C.B. Secondary metabolism and antioxidants are involved in environmental adaptation and stress tolerance in lettuce. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yuan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Huang, L. Water deficit affected flavonoid accumulation by regulating hormone metabolism in Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi roots. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Butelli, E.; Titta, L.; Giorgio, M.; Mock, H.P.; Matros, A.; Peterek, S.; Martin, C. Enrichment of tomato fruit with health-promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, F.; Zhu, H.; Kong, W.; Peng, R.; Liu, Q.; Yao, Q. The Antirrhinum AmDEL gene enhances flavonoids accumulation and salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta 2016, 244, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Liu, Z. Drought-induced in vivo synthesis of camptothecin in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 110, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Szabó, B.; Tyihák, E.; Szabó, G.; Botz, L. Mycotoxin and drought stress induced change of alkaloid content of Papaver somniferum plantlets. Acta Bot. Hung. 2003, 45, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jaleel, C.A.; Manivannan, P.; Sankar, B.; Kishorekumar, A.; Panneerselvam, R. Calcium chloride effects on salinity-induced oxidative stress, proline metabolism and indole alkaloid accumulation in Catharanthus roseus. C. R. Biol. 2007, 330, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Turtola, S.; Manninen, A.M.; Rikala, R.; Kainulainen, P. Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 1981–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bettaieb, I.; Zakhama, N.; Wannes, W.A.; Kchouk, M.E.; Marzouk, B. Water deficit effects on Salvia officinalis fatty acids and essential oils composition. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 20, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Munné-Bosch, S.; Mueller, M.; Schwarz, K.; Alegre, L. Diterpenes and antioxidative protection in drought-stressed Salvia officinalis plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158, 1431–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nowak, M.; Kleinwächter, M.; Manderscheid, R.; Weigel, H.J.; Selmar, D. Drought stress increases the accumulation of monoterpenes in sage (Salvia officinalis), an effect that is compensated by elevated carbon dioxide concentration. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2010, 83, 133–136. [Google Scholar]
  103. Vaughan, M.M.; Christensen, S.; Schmelz, E.A.; Huffaker, A.; Mcauslane, H.J.; Alborn, H.T.; Romero, M.; Allen, H.L.; Teal, P.E. Accumulation of terpenoid phytoalexins in maize roots is associated with drought tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Randriamampionona, D.; Diallo, B.; Rakotoniriana, F.; Rabemanantsoa, C.; Cheuk, K.; Corbisier, A.M.; Jaziri, M. Comparative analysis of active constituents in Centella asiatica samples from Madagascar: Application for ex situ conservation and clonal propagation. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Rahajanirina, V.; Raoseta, R.; Roger, E.; Razafindrazaka, H.; Pirotais, S.; Boucher, M.; Danthu, P. The influence of certain taxonomic and environmental parameters on biomass production and triterpenoid content in the leaves of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. from Madagascar. Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Menezes-Benavente, L.; Kernodle, S.P.; Margis-Pinheiro, M.; Scandalios, J.G. Salt-induced antioxidant metabolism defenses in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Redox Rep. 2004, 9, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Cuartero, J.; Bolarin, M.C.; Asins, M.J.; Moreno, V. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1045–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Minh, L.T.; Khang, D.T.; Ha, P.T.T.; Tuyen, P.T.; Minh, T.N.; Quan, N.V.; Xuan, T.D. Effects of salinity stress on growth and phenolics of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. Lett. Nat. Sci. 2016, 57, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B.; Sanada, Y.; Mohanty, P. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquat. Bot. 2004, 80, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ksouri, R.; Megdiche, W.; Debez, A.; Falleh, H.; Grignon, C.; Abdelly, C. Salinity effects on polyphenol content and antioxidant activities in leaves of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Hanen, F.; Ksouri, R.; Megdiche, W.; Trabelsi, N.; Boulaaba, M.; Abdelly, C. Effect of salinity on growth, leaf-phenolic content and antioxidant scavenging activity in Cynara cardunculus L. In Biosaline Agriculture and High Salinity Tolerance; Abdelly, C., Öztürk, M., Ashraf, M., Grignon, C., Eds.; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2008; pp. 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  113. Lim, J.H.; Park, K.J.; Kim, B.K.; Jeong, J.W.; Kim, H.J. Effect of salinity stress on phenolic compounds and carotenoids in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) sprout. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Petridis, A.; Therios, I.; Samouris, G.; Tananaki, C. Salinity-induced changes in phenolic compounds in leaves and roots of four olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) and their relationship to antioxidant activity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 79, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Borgognone, D.; Cardarelli, M.; Rea, E.; Lucini, L.; Colla, G. Salinity source-induced changes in yield, mineral composition, phenolic acids and flavonoids in leaves of artichoke and cardoon grown in floating system. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Falcinelli, B.; Sileoni, V.; Marconi, O.; Perretti, G.; Quinet, M.; Lutts, S.; Benincasa, P. Germination under moderate salinity increases phenolic content and antioxidant activity in rapeseed (Brassica napus var oleifera Del.) sprouts. Molecules 2017, 22, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. López-Berenguer, C.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.D.C.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M.; García-Viguera, C. Growing hardier crops for better health: Salinity tolerance and the nutritional value of broccoli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Valifard, M.; Mohsenzadeh, S.; Kholdebarin, B. Salinity effects on phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Salvia macrosiphon. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. A 2017, 41, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Imen, T.; Cristina, S.; Riccardo, I.; Flavia, N.I.; Zeineb, O. Phenolic acids and total antioxidant activity in Ocimum basilicum L. grown under Na2SO4 medium. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 5868–5875. [Google Scholar]
  120. Osman, M.E.; Elfeky, S.S.; El-Soud, K.A.; Hasan, A.M. Response of Catharanthus roseus shoots to salinity and drought in relation to vincristine alkaloid content. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2007, 6, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang, J.Y.; Liu, Z.P. Alkaloid accumulation in Catharanthus roseus increases with addition of seawater salts to the nutrient solution. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Neelam, M.; Rahul, M.; Ajiboye, M.; Kafayat, Y.; Lateefat, Y. Salicylic acid alters antioxidant and phenolics metabolism in Catharanthus roseus grown under salinity stress. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 11, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tounekti, T.; Vadel, A.M.; Ennajeh, M.; Khemira, H.; Munné-Bosch, S. Ionic interactions and salinity affect monoterpene and phenolic diterpene composition in rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis). J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Stewart, A.J.; Chapman, W.; Jenkins, G.I.; Graham, I.; Martin, T.; Crozier, A. The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency on flavonol accumulation in plant tissues. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ibrahim, M.H.; Jaafar, H.Z.; Rahmat, A.; Rahman, Z.A. The relationship between phenolics and flavonoids production with total non structural carbohydrate and photosynthetic rate in Labisia pumila Benth. under high CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Molecules 2010, 16, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Bongue-Bartelsman, M.; Phillips, D.A. Nitrogen stress regulates gene expression of enzymes in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway of tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1995, 33, 539–546. [Google Scholar]
  127. Coria-Cayupán, Y.S.; Sánchez de Pinto, M.I.; Nazareno, M.A. Variations in bioactive substance contents and crop yields of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivated in soils with different fertilization treatments. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10122–10129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Galieni, A.; Di Mattia, C.; De Gregorio, M.; Speca, S.; Mastrocola, D.; Pisante, M.; Stagnari, F. Effects of nutrient deficiency and abiotic environmental stresses on yield, phenolic compounds and antiradical activity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci. Hortic. 2015, 187, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gremigni, P.; Wong, M.T.F.; Edwards, N.K.; Harris, D.; Hamblin, J. Potassium nutrition effects on seed alkaloid concentrations, yield and mineral content of lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). Plant Soil 2001, 234, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Barlóg, P.K. Effect of magnesium and nitrogenous fertilisers on the growth and alkaloid content in Lupinus angustifolius L. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2002, 53, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ciesiołka, D.; Muzquiz, M.; Burbano, C.; Altares, P.; Pedrosa, M.M.; Wysocki, W.; Gulewicz, K. An effect of various nitrogen forms used as fertilizer on Lupinus albus L. yield and protein, alkaloid and α-galactosides content. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Al-Humaid, A.I. Effects of compound fertilization on growth and alkaloids of datura plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 27, 2203–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lerdau, M.; Matson, P.; Fall, R.; Monson, R. Ecological controls over monoterpene emissions from Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Ecology 1995, 76, 2640–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Burney, O.T.; Davis, A.S.; Jacobs, D.F. Phenology of foliar and volatile terpenoid production for Thuja plicata families under differential nutrient availability. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 77, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Blanch, J.S.; Peñuelas, J.; Llusià, J. Sensitivity of terpene emissions to drought and fertilization in terpene-storing Pinus halepensis and non-storing Quercus ilex. Physiol. Plant. 2007, 131, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ullrich, S.F.; Rothauer, A.; Hagels, H.; Kayser, O. Influence of light, temperature, and macronutrients on growth and scopolamine biosynthesis in Duboisia species. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wang, N.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Feng, S.; Chen, X. Synergistic effects of light and temperature on anthocyanin biosynthesis in callus cultures of red-fleshed apple (Malus sieversii f. niedzwetzkyana). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 127, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Woodrow, P.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Annunziata, M.G.; Pacifico, S.; Iannuzzi, F.; Mirto, A.; D-Amelia, L.; Dell-Aversana, E.; Piccolella, S.; Fuggi, A.; et al. Durum wheat seedling responses to simultaneous high light and salinity involve a fine reconfiguration of amino acids and carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 290–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 23 00762 g001 550
Figure 1. Classification and biosynthisis of flavonoids in plant (ANS = Anthocyanid in synthase; AS = Aureusidin synthase; C4H = Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase; CHI = Chalcone isomerase; 4CL = 4-coumaroyl: CoA-ligase; CHS = Chalcone synthase; DFR = Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; F3H = Flavanone-3-hydroxylase; F3′H = Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase; F3′5′H = Flavonoid 3′5′-hydroxylase; FLS = Flavonol synthase; FSI = Flavone synthase; IFS = Isoflavone synthase; PAL = Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; THC4′GT = UDP-glucose: tetrahydroxychalcone 4′GT).
Figure 1. Classification and biosynthisis of flavonoids in plant (ANS = Anthocyanid in synthase; AS = Aureusidin synthase; C4H = Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase; CHI = Chalcone isomerase; 4CL = 4-coumaroyl: CoA-ligase; CHS = Chalcone synthase; DFR = Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; F3H = Flavanone-3-hydroxylase; F3′H = Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase; F3′5′H = Flavonoid 3′5′-hydroxylase; FLS = Flavonol synthase; FSI = Flavone synthase; IFS = Isoflavone synthase; PAL = Phenylalanine ammonia lyase; THC4′GT = UDP-glucose: tetrahydroxychalcone 4′GT).
Molecules 23 00762 g001
Molecules 23 00762 g002 550
Figure 2. Classification of terpenoidsin plant. (A): monoterpenes, A1: Open-chain, A2: Single ring, A3: Bicyclic; (B): sesquiterpenes, B1: Open-chain, B2: Cyclic; (C): Diterpenes; (D): Triterpenes; (E): Tetraterpenes.
Figure 2. Classification of terpenoidsin plant. (A): monoterpenes, A1: Open-chain, A2: Single ring, A3: Bicyclic; (B): sesquiterpenes, B1: Open-chain, B2: Cyclic; (C): Diterpenes; (D): Triterpenes; (E): Tetraterpenes.
Molecules 23 00762 g002
Molecules 23 00762 g003 550
Figure 3. Classification of alkaloids in plant. (A): Amines; (B): Pyrrolidines; (C): Tropanes; (D): Piperidines; (E): Terpenoid; (F): Quinolines; (G1): 1-Benzylisoquinoline; (G2): Aporphines; (G3): Morphinane; (G4): Protoberberine; (G5): bisbenzylisoqunolines; (G6): Benzophenanthridines; (H1): Simple indoles; (H2): Tryptamine indoles; (H3): Monoterpenoid indoles; (H4): Bisindole alkaloids; (I): Steroidal alkaloids; (J): other alkaloids.
Figure 3. Classification of alkaloids in plant. (A): Amines; (B): Pyrrolidines; (C): Tropanes; (D): Piperidines; (E): Terpenoid; (F): Quinolines; (G1): 1-Benzylisoquinoline; (G2): Aporphines; (G3): Morphinane; (G4): Protoberberine; (G5): bisbenzylisoqunolines; (G6): Benzophenanthridines; (H1): Simple indoles; (H2): Tryptamine indoles; (H3): Monoterpenoid indoles; (H4): Bisindole alkaloids; (I): Steroidal alkaloids; (J): other alkaloids.
Molecules 23 00762 g003
Table
Table 1. Photoperiod change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 1. Photoperiod change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
PhenolsCaffeoylquinic acids [38]Molecules 23 00762 i001Short day of lightDecreaseX. pensylvanicuim
PhenolsPelargonidin [39]Molecules 23 00762 i002Short day of lightDecreaseP. contorta
PhenolsCatechins [40]Molecules 23 00762 i003Long day of lightIncreaseI. batatas
PhenolsHydroxybenzoic acids [40]Molecules 23 00762 i004Long day of lightIncreaseI. batatas
PhenolsChlorogenic acid [41]Molecules 23 00762 i005Long day of lightIncreaseV. myrtillus
Table
Table 2. Light intensity change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 2. Light intensity change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
AlkaloidsCamptothecin [45]Molecules 23 00762 i00627% Full sunlightIncreaseC. acuminate
PhenolsAsiatic acid [46]Molecules 23 00762 i00770% ShadeIncreaseC. asiatica
PhenolsAsiaticoside [46]Molecules 23 00762 i008Full sunlightIncreaseC. asiatica
PhenolsChlorogenic acid [47]Molecules 23 00762 i009Full sunlightIncreaseV. myrtillus
Table
Table 3. Light quality change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 3. Light quality change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
PhenolsFerulic acid [50]Molecules 23 00762 i010Increase red lightDecreaseL. sativa
PhenolsKaempferol [50]Molecules 23 00762 i011Increase red lightDecreaseL. sativa
AlkaloidsCatharanthine [53]Molecules 23 00762 i012UV-BIncreaseC. roseus
AlkaloidsVindoline [53]Molecules 23 00762 i013UV-BIncreaseC. roseus
PhenolsRutin [57]Molecules 23 00762 i014UVIncreaseF. esculentum
PhenolsQuercetin [57]Molecules 23 00762 i015UVIncreaseF. esculentum
PhenolsCatechins [57]Molecules 23 00762 i016UVIncreaseF. esculentum
Table
Table 4. Temperature change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 4. Temperature change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
AlkaloidsMorphine [65]Molecules 23 00762 i017Low temperatureDecreaseP. somniferum
PhenolsGenistein [66]Molecules 23 00762 i01810 °C for 24 hIncreaseG. max
PhenolsDaidzein [66]Molecules 23 00762 i01910 °C for 24 hIncreaseG. max
Alkaloids10-hydroxycamptothecin [67]Molecules 23 00762 i02040 °C for 2 hIncreaseC. acuminata
AlkaloidsVindoline [69]Molecules 23 00762 i021Short-term heatIncreaseC. roseus
AlkaloidsCatharanthine [69]Molecules 23 00762 i022Long-term heatIncreaseC. roseus
AlkaloidsVindoline [70]Molecules 23 00762 i023low temperatureDecreaseC. roseus
TerpenesIsoprene [72]Molecules 23 00762 i024High temperatureIncreaseQ. rubra
Terpenesα-terpinolene [73]Molecules 23 00762 i025High temperatureDecreaseD. carota
Terpenesβ-caryophyllene [74]Molecules 23 00762 i026High temperatureIncreaseD. carota
Terpenesα-farnesene [74]Molecules 23 00762 i027High temperatureIncreaseD. carota
TerpenesDMNT [78]Molecules 23 00762 i028Night-time warmingIncreaseB. pendula
PhenolsPelargonidin [78]Molecules 23 00762 i029Low temperatureIncreaseZ. mays
Table
Table 5. Soil water change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 5. Soil water change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
PhenolsSalidroside [87]Molecules 23 00762 i030Soil moisture of 55–75%Increase R. sachalinensis
PhenolsChlorogenic acid [88]Molecules 23 00762 i031Deficit IncreaseC. rataegus
PhenolsCatechins [88]Molecules 23 00762 i032Deficit IncreaseC. rataegus
Phenols(−)-epicatechins [88]Molecules 23 00762 i033Deficit IncreaseC. rataegus
PhenolsTanshinone [91]Molecules 23 00762 i034Severe droughtIncreaseS. miltiorrhiza
PhenolsCryptotanshinone [91]Molecules 23 00762 i035Severe droughtIncreaseS. miltiorrhiza
AlkaloidsCamptothecin [96]Molecules 23 00762 i036Drought IncreaseC. acuminate
AlkaloidsMorphine [97]Molecules 23 00762 i037Drought IncreaseP. somniferum
AlkaloidsCodeine [97]Molecules 23 00762 i038Drought IncreaseP. somniferum
AlkaloidsGlycine betaine [98]Molecules 23 00762 i039Drought IncreaseC. roseus
PhenolsAbietic acid [99]Molecules 23 00762 i040Severe droughtIncreaseP. sylvestris
PhenolsAsiaticoside [104]Molecules 23 00762 i041Humidity increaseIncreaseC. asiatica
Table
Table 6. Soil salinity change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 6. Soil salinity change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
PhenolsIsoorientin [113]Molecules 23 00762 i042NaCl (10–100 mM)IncreaseF. esculentum
PhenolsRutin [113]Molecules 23 00762 i043NaCl (10-100 mM)IncreaseF. esculentum
PhenolsVitexin [113]Molecules 23 00762 i044NaCl (10–100 mM)IncreaseF. esculentum
TerpenesOleuropein [114]Molecules 23 00762 i045NaCl (125 mM)IncreaseO. europaea
AlkaloidsCatharanthine [121]Molecules 23 00762 i0465% SeawaterIncreaseC. roseus
PhenolicChlorogenic acid [117]Molecules 23 00762 i047SalinityDecreaseB. oleracea var. italica cv. Marathon
PhenolicVanillin [118]Molecules 23 00762 i048SalinityIncreaseS. macrosiphon
PhenolicSinapic acid [117]Molecules 23 00762 i049SalinityDecreaseB. oleracea var. italica cv. Marathon
PhenolicProtocatechuic acid [118]Molecules 23 00762 i050SalinityIncreaseS. macrosiphon
TerpenesBorneol [123]Molecules 23 00762 i051NaCl (100 mM)DecreaseR. officinalis
TerpenesCineole [123]Molecules 23 00762 i052NaCl (100 mM)IncreaseR. officinalis
TerpenesCamphene [123]Molecules 23 00762 i053NaCl (100 mM)DecreaseR. officinalis
TerpenesCamphor [123]Molecules 23 00762 i054NaCl (100 mM)IncreaseR. officinalis
Terpenesα-terpineol [123]Molecules 23 00762 i055NaCl (100 mM)DecreaseR. officinalis
TerpenesHydroxytyrosol [114]Molecules 23 00762 i056NaCl (125 mM)DecreaseO. europaea
Table
Table 7. Soil fertility change on the content of various plant SMs.
Table 7. Soil fertility change on the content of various plant SMs.
Metabolite ClassMetabolite NameStructural ImageEnvironment FactorConcentration ChangePlant Species
PhenolsQuercetin [124]Molecules 23 00762 i057Nitrogen and phosphateIncreaseL. esculentum cv. Chaser
PhenolsKaempferol [124]Molecules 23 00762 i058Nitrogen and phosphateIncreaseL. esculentum cv. Chaser
PhenolsIsorhamnetin [124]Molecules 23 00762 i059Nitrogen and phosphateIncreaseL. esculentum cv. Chaser

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Wen, K.-S.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Wei, F.; Wang, Q. Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules 2018, 23, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040762

AMA Style

Yang L, Wen K-S, Ruan X, Zhao Y-X, Wei F, Wang Q. Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):762. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040762

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Li, Kui-Shan Wen, Xiao Ruan, Ying-Xian Zhao, Feng Wei, and Qiang Wang. 2018. "Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors" Molecules 23, no. 4: 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040762

APA Style

Yang, L., Wen, K.-S., Ruan, X., Zhao, Y.-X., Wei, F., & Wang, Q. (2018). Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules, 23(4), 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040762

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop