Next Article in Journal
Dual Radiolabeling as a Technique to Track Nanocarriers: The Case of Gold Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
A Database of Force-Field Parameters, Dynamics, and Properties of Antimicrobial Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Carotenoid-Derived Flavours and Fragrances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Quality Structural and Interaction Data Improves Binding Affinity Prediction via Random Forest
Article

Three-Dimensional Compound Comparison Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery

1
Department of Biological Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
School of Life Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
3
Discovery Chemistry Research and Technologies, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
4
Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Derek J. McPhee
Molecules 2015, 20(7), 12841-12862; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200712841
Received: 6 May 2015 / Revised: 7 July 2015 / Accepted: 13 July 2015 / Published: 16 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemoinformatics)
Virtual screening has been widely used in the drug discovery process. Ligand-based virtual screening (LBVS) methods compare a library of compounds with a known active ligand. Two notable advantages of LBVS methods are that they do not require structural information of a target receptor and that they are faster than structure-based methods. LBVS methods can be classified based on the complexity of ligand structure information utilized: one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D). Unlike 1D and 2D methods, 3D methods can have enhanced performance since they treat the conformational flexibility of compounds. In this paper, a number of 3D methods will be reviewed. In addition, four representative 3D methods were benchmarked to understand their performance in virtual screening. Specifically, we tested overall performance in key aspects including the ability to find dissimilar active compounds, and computational speed. View Full-Text
Keywords: ligand-based virtual screening; three-dimensional similarity; ROCS; USR; 3D Zernike descriptors; Patch-Surfer; PL-PatchSurfer; molecular shape; molecular surface ligand-based virtual screening; three-dimensional similarity; ROCS; USR; 3D Zernike descriptors; Patch-Surfer; PL-PatchSurfer; molecular shape; molecular surface
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, W.-H.; Zhu, X.; Bures, M.G.; Kihara, D. Three-Dimensional Compound Comparison Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery. Molecules 2015, 20, 12841-12862. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200712841

AMA Style

Shin W-H, Zhu X, Bures MG, Kihara D. Three-Dimensional Compound Comparison Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery. Molecules. 2015; 20(7):12841-12862. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200712841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Woong-Hee, Xiaolei Zhu, Mark G. Bures, and Daisuke Kihara. 2015. "Three-Dimensional Compound Comparison Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery" Molecules 20, no. 7: 12841-12862. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200712841

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop