Next Article in Journal
Mixed Antimony(V) Complexes with Different Sugars to Modulate the Oral Bioavailability of Pentavalent Antimonial Drugs
Next Article in Special Issue
In-Silico Analyses of Sesquiterpene-Related Compounds on Selected Leishmania Enzyme-Based Targets
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Isomerization of Some Novel Pyrazolopyrimidine and Pyrazolotriazolopyrimidine Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Benzoic Acid Derivative and Flavokawains from Piper species as Schistosomiasis Vector Controls
Article Menu

Export Article

Molecules 2014, 19(5), 5470-5477; doi:10.3390/molecules19055470

Two Trypanocidal Dipeptides from the Roots of Zapoteca portoricensis (Fabaceae)
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Nigeria, 410001 Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, 420281 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
Institute for Pharmaceutical Biology and Biotechnology, Heinrich-Heine-University, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Insitute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
Department of Medical Parasitology, University of Basel, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 18 March 2014; in revised form: 21 April 2014 / Accepted: 22 April 2014 / Published: 25 April 2014


Zapoteca portoricensis (Jacq) HM Hernández is used with remarkable efficacy in ethnomedicinal management of tonsillitis in the Eastern part of Nigeria. Previous pharmacological studies have validated the antiinflammatory and antimicrobial activities of the crude extract. In this study, two dipeptides, saropeptate (aurantiamide acetate) and anabellamide, were isolated from the methanol root extract of Zapoteca portoricensis and their chemical structures deduced by one dimensional and two dimensional NMR and mass spectrometry. These compounds were isolated for the first time from this plant, and no report has been found on their previous isolation from the genus Zapoteca. Evaluation of their trypanocidal activity showed that compound 1 exhibited potent activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense with an IC50 value of 3.63 µM and selectivity index of 25.3.
Zapoteca portoricensis; dipeptides; isolation; fabaceae; trypanocidal acitivity

1. Introduction

The genus Zapoteca which belongs to the family of Fabaceae is a glabrous seasonal shrub with slender unarmed branches. The plant is a native of West Africa, the West Indies and the Atlantic Coast of America. It is used in folk medicine in various countries for the treatment of toothache, tonsilitis, in wound healing, against diarrhoea, and as an anticonvulsant and antispasmodic. Our previous studies showed that the crude methanolic extract of the root and some of its fractions had significant anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antitrypanosomal properties [1,2,3]. The anti-ulcer, antifungal and antibacterial potentials have been equally documented [4,5,6].
Our literature survey showed that the chemistry of Zapoteca portorticensis has been poorly investigated. To date, there is no report on the isolation and characterization of any chemical constituents from this plant. We therefore decided to investigate the methanol root extract leading to the isolation of two dipeptides. Peptides generally possess unique pharmacological properties which could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. There is a growing interest in peptide therapeutics in the pharmaceutical industry based on increasing concerns about small molecular drugs and the increased attention to foods and nutraceuticals possessing health preventive or health promoting properties [7,8]. An estimated 60 peptide drugs were approved in 2010 alone, which generated annual sales of around US$ 13 billion. Dipeptides are usually metabolic products of bacteria and fungi but are only rarely isolated from plants. We report in this paper the isolation and structure elucidation of dipeptides from Zapoteca portoricensis, which is the first report of dipeptides from this genus.

2. Results and Discussion

The powdered roots of Z. portoricensis were extracted with methanol and the crude methanol extract was successively partitioned into hexane, ethyl acetate, butanol and water fractions. The chromatographic separations of the ethyl acetate fraction, using vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) on silica gel, Sephadex LH-20 and further purification with reverse phase semi-preparative HPLC yielded compounds 1 and 2 (Figure 1). Their structures were elucidated using 1H, 13C-NMR, DEPT, HMBC, HSQC and LC-MS spectral analyses and comparison of the data with those reported in the literature [9,10,11].
Compound 1 was isolated as white crystals. The ESI-MS showed peaks at at m/z 444.20 [M+H]+ and 467 [M+Na]+ which is consistent with a molar mass of 443 and a molecular formula C27H28N2O4. The 1H-NMR and 1H1H-COSY of 1 exhibited two spin systems in the aliphatic region. One began with a quartet at δH 4.74 (1H, q) assigned to H-2 which was coupled H-3b at δH 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 5.9, 14.0) and also H-3a at δH 3.04 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 14.0). The other spin system began with a multiplet at δH 4.33 (1H, m) assigned to H-2', which was coupled with H-3' at δH 2.73 (2H, t, J = 7.1). H-2' was also coupled with H-1'b δH 3.90 (1H, dd, J = 4.9, 11.3) and H-1'a at δH 3.79 (1H, dd, J = 4.2, 11.3). Two amide signals were observed at δH 6.72 (1H, d, J = 8.4, N-Hb) which showed COSY correlations with H-2 (δH 4.74 q) and at δH 5.89 (1H, d, J = 9.4, N-Ha) which showed COSY correlation with H-2' (4.33 m) (Figure 2). The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 also showed three sets of aromatic signals. These include signals δH 7.20–7.28, which integrated to five protons assigned to H-5, H-6, H-7, H-8 and H-9. Another set of aromatic signals were observed at δH 7.10–7.18 which integrated to three protons assigned to H-6', H-7' and H-8' together with a duplet at δH 7.05 (2H) assigned to H-5'/H-9'. Finally the 1H-NMR spectrum displayed aromatic spin signals of AA'BB'C type at δH 7.69 (2H, d, J = 7.2) assigned to H-12/H-16; δH 7.42 (2H, t, J = 7.6) assigned to H-13/H-15 and δH 7.50 (1H, t, J = 7.4) assigned to H-14. Compound 1 was identified as saropeptide (2-(2-benzamido-3-phenylpropanamido)-3-phenylpropyl acetate, Figure 1). The 1H-NMR data of 1 compared favourably with those previously reported for saropeptide isolated from Hypericum japonicum [9], the roots of Clausena anisata [11] and Zeyhera digitalis[12] and stems of Celastrus rugosus [13].
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the isolated compounds.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the isolated compounds.
Molecules 19 05470 g001
Figure 2. Key COSY and HMBC correlations. The thick lines show COSY correlations while the arrows show HMBC correlations.
Figure 2. Key COSY and HMBC correlations. The thick lines show COSY correlations while the arrows show HMBC correlations.
Molecules 19 05470 g002
Compound 2 was isolated as white crystals. Its molecular formular was determined as C32H30N2O4 based on ESI-MS peaks at m/z 506.22 [M+H]+ and 529 [M+Na]+. The 1H-NMR and 1H-1H-COSY spectra displayed two spin systems in the aliphatic region. The first began with a multiplet at δH 4.61, assigned to H-2 which was coupled with H-1b (4.52 m) and H-1a (4.01 dd (J = 4.3, 11.4) and also to H-3b at δH 2.98 dd (J = 6.4, 13.7) and H-3a at δH 2.87 dd (J = 8.4, 13.7). The second spin system began with a quartet at δH 4.90 (J = 6.7) assigned to H-2', which was coupled with H-3'b at δH 3.27 dd (J = 6.5, 13.9) and H-3'a at δH 3.19 dd (J = 7.1, 13.9). COSY correlations were also observed between the proton at δH 4.61 (1H, m, H-2) and an NH group at δH 6.64 (1H, d, J = 8.4, N-Hb), and the proton at δH 4.90 (1H, q, J = 6.7, H-2') and an NH group at δH 6.54 (1H, d, J = 6.5, N-Ha) (Figure 2). The aromatic region showed four sets of aromatic protons signals. These include two sets of 5H multiplets in two sets of AA'BB'C systems, which are compatible with four monosubstituted benzene rings. The analysis of the 13C-NMR and 13C-DEPT-135 showed the presence of two amide carbonyl functions δC 167.4 and 167.4 and an ester carbonyl function at δC 172.1, two benzylic methylene groups at δC (37.5 and 37.7) an oxymethylene (65.1), twenty two methine and four quarternary carbons. Compound 2 was thus elucidated as anabellamide (2-benzamido-3-phenylpropyl-2-benzamido-3-phenylpropanoate) (Figure 1) and the NMR data are consistent with those previously reported [9,10,11,14].
Compounds 1 and 2 were evaluated in vitro for trypanocidal activities against T. b. rhodesiense, Trypanosoma cruzi and for cytotoxicity against the mammalian L6 cells (Table 1).
Table 1. In vitro antitrypanosomal activity and cytotoxicity of dipeptides from Zapoteca portoricensis against T.b rhodesiense T. cruzi and cytotoxic effects against L6 cells.
Table 1. In vitro antitrypanosomal activity and cytotoxicity of dipeptides from Zapoteca portoricensis against T.b rhodesiense T. cruzi and cytotoxic effects against L6 cells.
CompoundT. b. rhodesienseT.cruziL6 cells
IC50 µMIC50 µMIC50 µM
The IC50’s are mean values from at least two replicates (the variation is a maximum of 20%). The reference compounds and their IC50’s are shown.
The IC50 values against T. b.rhodesiense were 3.63 µM for 1 and 12.21 µM for 2;while that against T. cruzi were 41.65 µM for 1 and 16.05 µM for 2. The corresponding IC50 values for L6 cells were 92.05 µM and 71.20 µM, respectively. These results indicated strong activity of compound 1 against T. b. rhodesiense and moderate activity of compound 2 against T. b. rhodesiense and T. cruzi, with selectivity indices of 25.3, 4.4 and 5.8, respectively. In previous studies compound 1 has been found to possess anti-inflammatory activity as well as antiplatelet aggregation activity [15,16,17]. These properties are complementary to the observed trypanocidal property, since inflammation poses major problems, especially in the advanced stages of trypanosomiasis [18]. Platelet aggregation is also known to be induced by trypanosomiasis [19]. Compound 2 was found to possess an aromatase inhibitory activity [20]. Thus, these two compounds represents promising natural hits, especially compound 1 with a reasonably selectivity for T. b. rhodesiense.

3. Experimental

3.1. General Procedures

NMR spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, HMQC and HMBC) were recorded with Bruker ARX 500 or AVANCE DMX 600 NMR spectrometers. MS (ESI) and HRMS (ESI) were obtained with Finnigan LCQ Deca and Maxis 4 G 20213 mass spectrometers, respectively. Analytical HPLC was carried out with a Dionex P580 HPLC system coupled to a photodiode array detector (UVD340S). Routine detection was at 235, 254, 280 and 354 nm. The separation column (125 × 4 mm, length × internal diameter) was prefilled with Eurospher-10 C18 (Knauer, Dusseldorf, Germany), and a linear gradient of nanopure water (adjusted to pH 2 by addition of formic acid) and methanol was used as eluent. Semipreparative HPLC was performed with a Merck Hitachi L-7100 system coupled to a UV detector (L-7400). A linear gradient of HPLC grade methanol and nanopure water was used in each case of separation.

3.2. Plant Materials

The roots of Z. portoricensis were collected in July, 2011 from Nsukka, in Enugu State, Nigeria. The plant was authenticated by Mr Alfred Ozioko, a taxonomist at the Centre for Ethnomedicine and Drugs Development, a subsidiary of the Bioresources and Development Center Programme (BDCP) in Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. A voucher specimen of the root was deposited at the herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria with reference number Pcg/SN 89. The plant material was air dried at room temperature for about 2 weeks.

3.3. Exraction and Isolation

About 500 g of the dried powder of Z. portoricensis roots was extracted with methanol. The methanol extract (24.6 g) was dispersed in 200 mL of 10% aqueous methanol and successively extracted with hexane (500 mL × 3), ethyl acetate (500 mL × 3) and butanol (500 mL) to obtain hexane (HF), ethylacetate (EF) and butanol (BF) fractions, respectively. The ethyl acetate fraction was further separated by vacuum liquid chromatography on silica gel (230–400 mesh) eluting with gradients of hexane ethylacetate and then dichloromethane to obtain fractions F1 to 10. Fraction F4 was further separated on Sephadex LH-20 eluted with 50% of dichloromethane in methanol. The fractions were monitored on silica TLC plates developed with dichloromethane: methanol 9:1 and detection was done under UV 254 nm and by anisaldehyde spray. Fractions 20–69, which showed consistently similar spots were combined and finally purified by reverse phase semi-preparative HPLC to afford the two compounds 1 and 2.
Saropeptide (1): Yield 2.0 mg; white crystals; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.69 d (2H, dd, J = 7.2 Hz, H-12/H-16), 7.50 (1H, t, J = 7.4, H-14), 7.42 (2H, t, J = 7.6, H-13/H-15), 7.20–7.28 (5H, m, H-5/H-6/H-7/H-8/H-9), 7.10–7.18 (3H, m, H-6'/H-7'/H-8'), 7.05 (2H, d, H-5'/H-9'), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 8.4, N-Hb), 5.89 (1H, d, J = 9.3, N-Ha), 4.74 (1H, q, H-2), 4.33 (1H, m, H-2'), 3.90 (1H, dd, J = 4.9, 11.3, H-1'b), 3.79 (1H, dd, J = 4.2, 11.3, H-1'a)), 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 5.9, 14.0, H-3b), 3.04 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 14.0, H-3a), 2.73 (2H, t, J = 7.1, CH2-3'), 2.01 (3H, s, CH3-2''); MS (ESI+): m/z = 444.9 (55%) [M+H]+, 467(100%) [M+H]+, 403 (35%), 385 (15%).
Anabellamide (2): Yield 5.0 mg; white crystals; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.68 (2H, dd, J = 7.2 Hz, H-12'/H-16'), 7.64 (2H, dd, J = 7.2 Hz, H-12/H-16), 7.49 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-14), 7.42 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-14'), 7.37 (2H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, H-13/H-15), 7.29 (2H, overlap, H-13'/H-15'), 7.18–7.22 (5H, m, H-5/H-6/H-7/H-8/H-9), 7.26–7.29 (5H, m, H-5'/H-6'/H-7'/H-8'/H-9'), 6.64 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, N-Hb), 6.54 (1H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, N-Ha), 4.90 (1H, q, J = 6.7 Hz, H-2'), 4.61 (1H, m, H-2), 4.52 (1H, m, H-1b), 4.01 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 4.3 Hz, H-1a), 3.27 (1H, dd, J = 13.9, 6.5 Hz, H-3'b), 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 13.9, 7.1 Hz, H-3'a), 2.98 (1H, dd, J = 13.7, 6.4 Hz, H-3b), 2.87 (1H, dd, J = 13.7, 8.4 Hz, H-3a). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 172.1 (s, C-1'; ester C=O), 167.4 and 167.4 (both s, C-10 and C-10'; benzamide C=O), 137.4 (s, C-4), 136 (s, C-4'), 133.5 (s, C-11) 134.4 (s, C-11'), 132.3 (d, C-14), 131.6 (d, C-14'), 129.5 (d, C-5/C-9), 129.1 (d, C-5'/C-9'), 128.9 (d, C-13/C-15), 128.8 (d, C-13'/C-15'), 129.4 (d, C-6'/C-8'), 128.7 (d, C-6/C-8), 127.6 (d, C-7'), 127.4 (d, C-12'/C-16'), 127.3 (d, C-12/C-16), 127 (d, C-7), 65.6 (t, C-1), 54.7 (d, C-2'), 50.5 (d, C-2), 37.7 (t, C-3'), 37.5 (t, C-3). MS (ESI+): m/z = 506 (30%) [M+H]+, 529 (52%) [M+Na]+, 239 (100%); 292 (30%).

3.4. Determination of in Vitro Antitrypanosomal Activity and Cytotoxicity

Minimum essential medium (50 µL) supplemented according to a standard method [21], with 2-mercaptoethanol and 15% heat inactivated horse serum was added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate. Serial drug dilutions were prepared covering a range from 90 to 0.123 µg/mL. Then 104 bloodstream forms of T. b. rhodesiense STIB 900 in 50 µL culture medium were added to each well and the plate incubated at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 72 h. Ten microlitres of Alamar Blue (12.5 mg resazurin dissolved in 100 mL distilled water) were then added to each well and incubation continued for 2–4 h. The plate was then read in a Spectramax Gemini XS microplate fluorometer (Molecular Devices Cooperation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using an excitation wavelength of 536 nm and emission wavelength of 588 nm. Fluorescence development was measured and expressed as percentage of the control. Data were transferred into the graphic programme Softmax Pro (Molecular Devices) which calculated IC50 values [22]. Melarsoprol was used as standard drug.
Cytotoxicity was determined using rat skeletal myoblast (L6) cells. The culture medium was RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine 2 mM, HEPES 5.95 g/L, NaHCO3 2 g/L and 10% foetal bovine serum. Podophyllotoxin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the reference drug. The assay was performed following the antitrypanosomal assay protocol [21]. The IC50 values were calculated from the sigmoidal inhibition curves using Softmax Pro software (Molecular Devices). Tests were done in three independent experiments in duplicate.

4. Conclusions

The two dipeptides saropeptide (1) and anabellamide (2) were isolated for the first time from Z. portoricensis. Investigation of their trypanocidal activity as well as their cytotoxicity using rat skeletal myoblast (L6) cells showed that compound 1 exhibited potent activity against T. b.rhodesiense with high selectivity index, while compound 2 exhibited moderate activities against T. b.rhodesiense and T. cruzi.


The authors wish to acknowledge the grant from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, awarded to Peter Proksch and Abdessamad Debbab.

Author Contributions

The contributions of the respective authors are as follows: N.J. Nwodo is the principal investigator, did the isolation, identification and prepared the manuscript, hence the corresponding author. F.B.C. Okoye contributed in the confirming of isolation procedures, especially interpretation of the spectra and also part of the preparation of the manuscript. D. Lai elucidated the structures of the compounds. A. Debbab is part of the grant that supported this work. P. Proksch made available the laboratory, including equipments, consumables and guided the processes of isolation of these compounds. R. Brun carried out the bioassay and contributed in the preparing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Nwodo, N.J.; Uzochukwu, C.I. Studies on anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities of crude methanol extracts of Zapoteca portoricensis Jacq. H. Hernanadez. Recent Prog. Med. Plants 2008, 19, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nwodo, N.J.; Omeje, E.O.; Brun, R. In vitro–in vivo studies on anti-trypanosomal potentials of Zapoteca portoricensis. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2009, 2, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agbo, M.O.; Okoye, F.B.C.; Nwodo, N.J. In vivo anti-inflammatory effect of Zapoteca portoricensis (Jacq) HM Hernández. Inter. J. Health Res. 2010, 3, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. Esimone, C.O.; Onuh, P.U.; Obitte, N.C.; Egege, M.K.; Ugoeze, K.C. In vitro evaluation of lozenges containing extracts of roots of Zapoteca portoricensis (FAM: Fabaceae). J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 4, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ukwe, C.V.; Ubaka, C.M.; Adibe, M.O.; Okonkwo, C.J.; Akah, P.A. Antiulcer activity of roots of Zapoteca portoricensis (Fam. Fabaceae). J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2010, 1, 183–186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Agbafor, K.N.; Akubugwu, E.I.; Ogbashi, N.E.; Ajah, P.M.; Ukwandu, C.C. Chemical and Antimicrobial properties of leaf extracts of Zapoteca portoricensis. Res. J. Med. Plants 2011, 5, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Danquah, M.K.; Agyei, D. Pharmaceutical applications of bioactive peptides. OA Biotechnol. 2012, 1, 5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hartmann, R.; Meisel, H. Food-derived peptides with biological activity: From research to food applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishiguro, K.; Nagata, S.; Fukumoto, H.; Yamaki, M.; Takagi, S.; Isoi, S. A dipeptide derivative from Hypericum japonicum. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3639–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hashim, N.M.; Rahmani, M.; Shamaun, S.S.; Ee, G.C.L.; Sukari, M.A.; Ali, A.M.; Go, R. Dipeptide and xanthones from Artocarpus kemando Miq. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4224–4230. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kouam, J.L.; Dongo, E.; Mpondo, T.N.; White, R.L. Chemical constituents from stem bark and roots of Clausena anisata. Molecules 2012, 17, 13673–13686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferreira, D.T.; Silva, R.B.; Deoliveira, A.B.; Isobe, M.; Braz, R. Dipeptide from the root of Zeyhera digitalis. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1995, 6, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, R.; Wang, C.; Zeng, Q.; Guan, B.; Zhang, W.; Jin, H. Chemical constituents of the stems of Celastrus rugosus. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2013, 36, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carvalho, M.G.; Cardozo, M.A.; Catunda, F.E., Jr.; Carvalho, A.G. Chemical constituents of Piptadenia gonoacantha J.F. Macbr. Ann. Braz. Acad. Sci. 2010, 82, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuo, P.C.; Hwang, T.L.; Lin, Y.T.; Kuo, Y.C.; Leu, Y.L. Chemical constituents from Lobelia chinensis and their anti-virus and ant-inflammatory bioactivities. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011, 34, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Catalan, C.A.N.; de Heluani, C.S.; Kotowicz, C.; Gedris, T.E.; Herz, W. A linear sesterterpene, two squalene derivative and two peptide derivatives from Croton hieronymi. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, T.S.; Chan, Y.Y.; Liou, M.J.; Lin, F.W.; Shi, L.S.; Chen, K.T. Platelet aggregation inhibitor from Murraya euchrestifolia. Phytother. Res. 1998, 12, S80–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lundkvist, G.B.; Sellix, M.T.; Nygard, M.; Davis, E.; Straume, M.; Kristensson, K.; Block, G.D. Clock gene expression during chronic inflammation induced by infection with Trypanosoma brucei brucei in rats. J. Biol. Rhythms. 2010, 2, 92–102. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nwagwu, M.; Inyang, A.L.; Molokwu, R.I.; Essen, E.M. Platelet aggregating activity of released factor(s) from Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Afr. J. Med. Sci. 1989, 4, 283–287. [Google Scholar]
  20. Balunas, M.J.; Su, B.; Riswan, S.; Fong, H.H.S.; Brueggemeier, R.W.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D. Isolation and characterisation of aromatase inhibitor from Brassaiopsis glomerulata (Araliaceae). Phytochem. Lett. 2009, 2, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baltz, T.; Baltz, D.; Giroud, C.; Crockett, J. Cultivation in a semi-defined medium of animal infective forms of Trypanosoma brucei, T. equiperdum, T. evansi, T. rhodesiense and T. gambiense. EMBO J. 1985, 4, 1273–1277. [Google Scholar]
  22. Orhan, I.; Sener, B.; Kaiser, M.; Brun, R.; Tasdemir, D. Inhibitory activity of marine sponge-derived natural products against parasitic protozoa. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top