Prodrugs of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone and Related Peptides as Central Nervous System Agents

1. Introduction

Figure 1. Chemical structure of TRH and its analogues used in our studies.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of TRH and its analogues used in our studies.

2. TRH and Related Peptides as CNS Agents

2.1. [Leu²]TRH prodrugs

A centrally selective natural analogue of TRH is [Leu²]TRH (pGlu-Leu-Pro-NH₂, Figure 1) [42], in which the central His of TRH is replaced with Leu. Compared to TRH, [Leu²]TRH shows an approximately 2.5-fold increase in typical TRH-associated analeptic effect and 50-fold decrease in promoting TSH release [43]. Therefore, we selected this tripeptide for substantiating our brain-targeting prodrug approach [25]. Nevertheless, [Leu²]TRH possesses a profound peptide character such as poor lipophilicity (logP = –1.67) that prohibits significant transport across the BBB. The amino- and carboxy-termini of [Leu²]TRH are not suitable for direct bioreversible derivatization to create a lipophilic prodrug by our approach; however, we envisioned that (by the analogy of TRH biosynthesis [44]) Gln-Leu-Pro-Gly would be a suitable progenitor sequence for [Leu²]TRH. Specifically, it was expected that peptidyl-a-hydroxy-glycine (PAM, [45]) would convert the carboxy-terminal Gly to Pro-NH₂ and glutaminyl cyclase (QC [46]) would eventually produce pGlu from Gln by using this progenitor sequence. A “transport moiety” (1,4-dihydrotrigonellyl, Dht, residue) [26] for the prodrug creation was attached through strategically selected [47,48] scissile linkers (S) to the amino-terminus of the Gln-Leu-Pro-Gly progenitor sequence [25], as shown in Figure 2. Dht is expected to be oxidized to pyridinium (trigonellyl, Trig; the residue of N-methylnicotinic acid) in the brain analogously to that of NAD(P)H to NADP⁺ and, therefore, the resultant “oxidized prodrug” is captured inside the brain due to its ionic nature. To furnish lipophilicity to the prodrug for BBB transport, its carboxy-terminus was esterified with highly lipophilic alcohols such as cholesterol (Cho). The idea behind this design was that [Leu²]TRH is eventually formed in the brain after a well-orchestrated sequence of enzymatic processes (i to v, Figure 2).

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the prodrug concept developed for the brain delivery of [Leu²]TRH utilizing Gln-Leu-Pro-Gly progenitor sequence and enzymes (i to iv ) inherently present in the brain.

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the prodrug concept developed for the brain delivery of [Leu²]TRH utilizing Gln-Leu-Pro-Gly progenitor sequence and enzymes (i to iv ) inherently present in the brain.

A series of in vitro and in vivo experiments were employed in our proof-of-concept studies due to the complexity of the molecular architecture and the necessity of a multistep bioactivation process leading to the liberation of [Leu²]TRH [25]. We thoroughly investigated the cascade of enzymatic reactions responsible for the release of the core peptide by using appropriate putative metabolites. One of the most important steps is the Pro-NH₂ formation on the carboxy-terminus. In vitro studies showed that this process was significant only in the brain. In blood and liver, the primary degradation produced an inactive metabolite having Pro-OH as the carboxy-terminal residue and moreover, the metabolism of the “oxidized” prodrug was much faster in the brain than in the blood and liver; thus, systemic formation of [Leu²]TRH was practically prevented. The peptidolytic cleavage catalyzed by enzymes such as dipeptidyl dipeptidases (EC 3.4.14.2 and/or EC 3.4.14.5) [47,49] for S=Pro/Ala, or proline oligopeptidase (POP, EC 3.4.21.26) [48] when S is a dipeptidyl moiety (e.g.: Ala-Pro, Table 1) to form Gln-Leu-Pro-NH₂ (Figure 2) and the subsequent rapid formation of [Leu²]TRH by QC without significant side-reactions were also unequivocally detected in vitro [25].

Table 1. Barbiturate-induced sleeping times in mice after the administration of [Leu²]TRH and its produgs having various spacers (S). Sleeping time decrease is expressed as percent of sleeping time for vehicle administration only (54.9 ±3.8 min). Ten min after i.v. injection of the test compounds at a dose of 15 µmol/kg body weight, pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was injected. Sleeping time was recorded from the onset of the loss of the righting reflex until the reflex was regained. The statistical significance of differences between groups was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Fisher’s PLSD test for multiple comparisons: *P < 0.05 vs vehicle control, **P <0.05 vs both [Leu²]TRH and vehicle.

Table 1. Barbiturate-induced sleeping times in mice after the administration of [Leu²]TRH and its produgs having various spacers (S). Sleeping time decrease is expressed as percent of sleeping time for vehicle administration only (54.9 ±3.8 min). Ten min after i.v. injection of the test compounds at a dose of 15 µmol/kg body weight, pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) was injected. Sleeping time was recorded from the onset of the loss of the righting reflex until the reflex was regained. The statistical significance of differences between groups was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Fisher’s PLSD test for multiple comparisons: *P < 0.05 vs vehicle control, **P <0.05 vs both [Leu²]TRH and vehicle.

Compound	% Decrease in Sleeping Time
[Leu2]TRH	17 ± 7*
Prodrug, S= Ala	30 ± 3*
Prodrug, S= Pro	47 ± 6**
Prodrug, S= Ala-Ala	32 ± 4*
Prodrug, S= Pro-Ala	56 ± 4**
Prodrug, S= Pro-Pro	55 ± 7**

In vivo substantiation of the design was done by monitoring the CNS-mediated analeptic effect, a convenient pharmacological paradigm for the evaluation of TRH-related peptides, to assess the increase in the access of the prodrugs to the CNS upon i.v. injection of the prodrugs having various S moieties attached to the amino-terminal Gln of the progenitor sequence. Antagonism on the barbiturate-induced anesthesia indicates the extent of the activation of cholinergic neurons [37] and, thus, the successful central delivery of [Leu²]TRH by the prodrugs. As shown by the results summarized in Table 1, the unmodified parent peptide, [Leu²]TRH, decreased the sleeping time only by 17 ± 7% compared to the vehicle control (propylene glycol/DMSO 2:1 v/v; sleeping time 54.9 ± 3.8 min), while the most significant (p< 0.05) analeptic effect was achieved with prodrugs having Pro residue in their S function. The data in Table 1 also highlight the critical influence of the peptidase-catalyzed S-Gln cleavage on the observed pharmacological effect. The crucial role of the scissile peptide linkers (S) in successful peptide delivery in to the brain by analogous prodrug design was also confirmed for a Leu-enkaphalin analogue [50,51].

2.2. [Glu²]TRH Prodrugs

The TRH-like tripeptide [Glu²]TRH (pGlu-Glu-Pro-NH₂, Figure 1), although originally identified from rabbit prostate [52], has been shown to occur in the human brain [53]. Many pharmacological activities of this peptide are similar to those of TRH [54]; however, the beneficial effects after treatment with [Glu²]TRH are reportedly more robust or prolonged. These advantages are probably due to the increased resistance of this peptide to enzymes principally responsible for the rapid degradation of TRH in vivo [40]. In addition, [Glu²]TRH practically does not bind to TRH receptors and does not elevate triiodothyronine (T3) levels which has indicated that the peptide probably exerts pharmacological effects through binding to its own receptor in the CNS.

Figure 3. Structure of [Glu²]TRH prodrugs as potential CNS agents.

Figure 3. Structure of [Glu²]TRH prodrugs as potential CNS agents.

Due to the presence of the central Glu, this peptide is, however, predominantly ionized at physiological pH at the γ-carboxyl group of Glu, which would prevent pharmacologically significant amounts of peptide entering the brain by passive transport. Therefore, we carried out a bioreversible modification to afford prodrugs on this γ-COOH of the Glu residue to render the molecule neutral (non-ionizable) and, hence, amenable for diffusion across the BBB [55]. The synthesized esters (R = methyl: Me; Hex: n-hexyl; c-Hex: cyclohexyl; t-Bu: tert-butyl; Bz: benzyl) were first evaluated for their potential to interact with biological membranes by immobilized artificial membrane chromatography (IAMC) [56,57,58]. IAMC measures partitioning into monolayers of cell membrane-like phospholipids immobilized by covalent binding on silica particles and therefore, mimics membrane interactions better than partitioning in the isotropic n-octanol/water system (logP). The chromatographic capacity factor (k’_IAM) for a compound obtained by the method is directly related to its partition coefficient between the aqueous phase and the chemically bonded membrane phase and, ultimately, to the K_m value representing its fluid-membrane partition coefficient.

Table 2 shows that all ester prodrugs had increased membrane affinity compared to the unmodified parent peptide, and the hexyl ester (R = n-Hex) yielded the highest k’_IAM (16.0). In vitro stability studies in mouse brain homogenate (20%, w/v) revealed that the half-lives were around 20 min and 22 min for R = Me and Hex, respectively, 25 min for R = c-Hex, and 70 min for the sterically hindered ester (R = t-Bu). On the other hand, the aromatic benzyl ester (R = Bz) was quite stable in the tissue (t_½ > 2 h) that rendered the compound practically useless as a prodrug. We utilized again the robust analeptic activity of [Glu²]TRH as an indicator of the CNS effect, although the potency of this compound as an analeptic agent is less than that of TRH [35]. When compared to an equimolar dose of the parent peptide (10 µmol/kg body weight, i.v), prodrugs having R=Me, Hex, c-Hex, respectively, showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) decrease in the sleeping time compared to that of unmodified parent peptide. The measured pharmacological effect appeared to correlate well with the in vitro metabolic stability of the prodrugs measured in mouse the brain homogenate.

A slight influence of the increase in membrane affinity was also revealed upon comparing the analeptic response of the aliphatic methyl- and n-hexyl esters (Table 2). In all, esterification of the COOH in the side chain of the Glu residue with primary alcohols (the more lipophilic the better) afforded the most promising prodrugs for an efficient central delivery of [Glu²]TRH. Dose-response studies with the “best-performing” prodrug (R=Hex) also revealed that ED₅₀ was around 2 µmol/kg body weight—a significant (10-fold) improvement in efficacy compared to that of the unmodified parent peptide.

Table 2. IAMC capacity factors (k’_IAM), in vitro half-lives (in 20% w/v mouse brain homogenate) and analeptic effects of test compounds (i.v. in mice at equimolar dose of 10 µmol/kg body weight when pentobarbital (i.p., 60 mg/kg body weight) was administered 10 min after the injection of the saline vehicle or test compounds) [55]. The k’_IAM value was calculated as (t_R-t₀)/t₀, where t_R is the retention time for the compound and t₀ is retention time of [Glu²]TRH used as a marker for dead volume. Statistically significant differences (ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test, P<0.05) from the control group (vehicle) and from both control group and Glu²[TRH] were indicated by single and double asterisks, respectively.

Table 2. IAMC capacity factors (k’_IAM), in vitro half-lives (in 20% w/v mouse brain homogenate) and analeptic effects of test compounds (i.v. in mice at equimolar dose of 10 µmol/kg body weight when pentobarbital (i.p., 60 mg/kg body weight) was administered 10 min after the injection of the saline vehicle or test compounds) [55]. The k’_IAM value was calculated as (t_R-t₀)/t₀, where t_R is the retention time for the compound and t₀ is retention time of [Glu²]TRH used as a marker for dead volume. Statistically significant differences (ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test, P<0.05) from the control group (vehicle) and from both control group and Glu²[TRH] were indicated by single and double asterisks, respectively.

Compound	k’IAM	t1/2 (min)	Sleeping time (min)
Vehicle	N/A	N/A	80±2
[Glu2]TRH, R=H	0	N/A	65±3*
R=Me	0.13	20	54±1**
R=Hex	16.0	22	50±2**
R=cHex	6.02	55	55±2**
R=tBu	1.67	70	58±1*
R=Bz	5.48	>120	72±2

3. Prodrug-amenable analogues of TRH and related peptides as CNS Agents

3.1. TRH analogues by replacement of the basic central residue

To utilize the dihydropyridine-containing transport moiety for peptide-based brain delivery, one has to first design/discover specific analogues/mimetics of the target peptide that contain pyridinium residues suitable for chemical reduction, thus, prodrug creation. As such, first we replaced the basic central His (containing the ionizable imidazole ring), believed to be an essential structural element to the full thyrotropin-releasing activity but not to CNS-effects [61], with pyridinium derivatives resulting in novel TRH analogues (Figure 4) that are directly amenable for brain-targeting prodrug creation [62,63] by simply reducing the pyridinium moiety to the neutral dihydropyridine. We also hypothesized that a permanently charged pyridinium moiety directly replacing the ionizable imidazole ring of His would yield the closest analogue (n=1, Figure 4) of TRH and, thus, expected to endow the maximum CNS-activity.

This hypothesis was tested by the synthesis and comparative evaluation of additional side-chain elongated homologues (n=2–4). The TRH analogues were prepared by semi-automated solid-phase peptide synthesis utilizing fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chemistry and benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate/N-hydroxybenztriazole/diisopropylethylamine coupling [60]. Introduction of the pyridinium moiety was also carried out by solid-phase Zincke-reaction [64]. The corresponding prodrugs were obtained upon straightforward reduction of the central pyridinium to dihydropyridine with Na₂S₂O₄ [50] or NaBH₄ [62]. These neutral brain-targeting prodrugs apparently reach the brain where, after enzymatic oxidation (from dihydropyridine to pyridinium [26]) the analogues are regenerated at the site of action. A measurement for the increase in the ability of prodrugs generated from the designed analogues was, again, evaluated by IAMC. As shown in Table 3, the dihydropyridine moiety in the prodrugs, indeed, improved the affinity of the compounds to membrane lipids when compared to the parent (ionic) analogue.

Table 3. IAMC capacity factors (k’_IAM) and computed logarithm of octanol/water partitioning (log P) as predictors for membrane permeability for TRH, its novel analogues having pyridinium central residue and their corresponding prodrugs shown in Figure 4. Adapted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

Table 3. IAMC capacity factors (k’_IAM) and computed logarithm of octanol/water partitioning (log P) as predictors for membrane permeability for TRH, its novel analogues having pyridinium central residue and their corresponding prodrugs shown in Figure 4. Adapted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

Compound	k’IAM	Computed logP
		Fragment-basedmethod [65]	Quantum chem. approach [66]	Volume-based method [67]
TRH	0.51	-4.37	-0.27	-1.74
Pyridinium Analogue, n=1	0.30	-2.67	-2.15	-2.64
Prodrug of Analogue, n=1	0.55	-4.38	-3.14	-3.29
Pyridinium Analogue, n=2	0.42	-2.61	-1.85	-2.18
Prodrug of Analogue, n=2	0.80	-4.33	-2.92	-2.84
Pyridinium Analogue, n=3	0.49	-2.16	-2.67	-1.74
Prodrug of Analogue, n=3	1.47	-3.88	-3.30	-2.39
Pyridinium Analogue, n=4	0.60	-1.77	-2.68	-1.29
Prodrug of Analogue, n=4	2.30	-3.48	-3.55	-1.94

Figure 4. Prodrug-amenable [pyridinium²]TRH analogues and their corresponding brain-targeting prodrugs (n=1-4).

Figure 4. Prodrug-amenable [pyridinium²]TRH analogues and their corresponding brain-targeting prodrugs (n=1-4).

Interestingly, the prodrug of the analogue having the shortest side-chain (n=1) was predicted isolipophilic with TRH. On the other hand, while the measured k’_IAM values show the expected trend, the in silico predictions for logP values [based on (a) group fragments [65]; (b) semi-empirical (AM1) quantum chemical method [66]; (c) molecular volume plus H-bonding [67], respectively, displayed a great array of unrealistic discrepancies within and among the methods employed (Table 3). Clearly, an experimental validation of such predicted logP values appears to be necessary.

Figure 5. Parallel trends between the analeptic potency (i.v. injection at equimolar dose of 15 µmol/kg body weight as prodrugs) and ACh-releasing effect (perfusion of the analogues into the hippocampus by microdialysis at equimolar concentrations of 1 nmol/µl) of the novel [pyridinium²]TRH analogues shown in Figure 4 together with those of TRH and control (saline vehicle), respectively. * P<0.05 vs. vehicle control. Reprinted with permission from [65]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

Figure 5. Parallel trends between the analeptic potency (i.v. injection at equimolar dose of 15 µmol/kg body weight as prodrugs) and ACh-releasing effect (perfusion of the analogues into the hippocampus by microdialysis at equimolar concentrations of 1 nmol/µl) of the novel [pyridinium²]TRH analogues shown in Figure 4 together with those of TRH and control (saline vehicle), respectively. * P<0.05 vs. vehicle control. Reprinted with permission from [65]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

In mouse plasma and brain homogenate (20%, w/v), the prodrugs converted to the corresponding analogues with t_1/2 around 20 min and 6 min, respectively. On the other hand, we measured a half-life of 16 min in brain homogenate and 11 min in plasma, respectively, for TRH, while all novel analogues (n=1–4) were very stable in these tissues (less than 10% degradation in 2 hours). It should be noted that the longer t_1/2 of prodrugs in plasma compared to that of in the brain is beneficial to the CNS-sequestration of the analogues after systemic administration. Replacement of [His²] practically abolished binding affinity (>100 μM compared to 42 nM for TRH) to the receptor labeled by [3H][3-Me-His2]TRH in pellets obtained from rat brain Accordingly, no endocrine effect may be expected from the designed analogues having permanently charged central residue [61].

Initial neuropharmacological validation of our design was done by monitoring the already mentioned antagonism of barbiturate-induced anesthesia upon i.v. administration of the corresponding prodrugs (Figure 5). The saline vehicle alone (1.5 ml/kg body weight) or equimolar doses (15 µmol/kg body weight) of test compounds were injected through the tail vein. After 10 min, each animal received an i.p. injection of sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 60 mg/kg. A statistically significant (p<0.05) decrease in the sleeping time was achieved by the administration of prodrugs of analogues having n =1, 2 and 4 side-chains, compared to the control. Moreover, the analogue with the shortest side-chain (n=1) produced TRH–equivalent analeptic action when administered in its prodrug form. In that regard, our hypothesis was correct in terms of predicting that the permanently charged pyridinium moiety directly replacing the ionizable imidazole ring of His would yield the closest analogue of TRH and, thus, produce maximum CNS-activity among the homologues. As expected, without neutral prodrug creation, the ionic analogues were ineffective due to their inability to reach the CNS when administered by parenteral injection (data not shown).

TRH and related peptide are apparently exerts their analeptic action thorough cholinergic mechanism [36,37]. Therefore, in another set of experiments, we measured the changes in hippocampal acetylcholine (ACh) concentration when the analogues (n=1–4, Figure 4) were perfused through a microdialysis probe placed into the hippocampus of rats (Figure 5) [68]. Although none of the analogues outperformed TRH in this experimental model at equimolar concentration (1 nmol/µL), they significantly increased ACh levels compared to the control. Even the most potent analogue (n=1) exerted an approximately 30% lower stimulation of the ACh release compared to that of TRH. The increase in the length of the side-chain (from n=1 to n=4) showed a similar tendency observed for the analeptic action. Again, ACh production levels after administration of analogue with n=3 were not significantly different from those of obtained after perfusion of the control only, given the error calculated from the experiments. Figure 5 also shows a strong connection between the analeptic activity and the ACh-releasing capacity of TRH analogues and TRH, respectively. Elongation of the side-chain implied a V-shape tendency in producing the pharmacological responses among the homologues. This trend remains to be explored and, perhaps, exploited in a future study.

The most promising analogue (n=1) was further studied and compared to TRH for the duration of the analeptic action by increasing the time after which the cholinergic challenge was made in the animals injected with TRH or the prodrug of this analogue (Figure 6). The analeptic activity of TRH showed an overall decrease, when the time between the injections was increased. A loss of over half of CNS-activity was observed at 60 min, compared to the value measured when the pentobarbital injection was made 10 min after TRH exposure to the mice. Administration of the prodrug, however, produced the shortest sleeping time, when the cholinergic challenge was done 20 to 30 min post drug administration. Moreover, the analeptic effect still remained comparable to the maximum value reached by TRH in our experiments even 60 min after administration of the pentobarbital. This sustained CNS effect may be attributed to the metabolic stability of the designed analogue.

Figure 6. Comparison of the analeptic effect of equimolar doses (15 µmol/kg body weight, i.v.) of TRH ( ) and its [pyridinium²] analogue with n=1 ( ) administered in its prodrug form upon varying the time for pentobarbital treatment (60 mg/kg body weight, i.p.) post-drug administration. * indicates statistically significant differences (ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, P<0.05) from vehicle control. Reprinted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

Figure 6. Comparison of the analeptic effect of equimolar doses (15 µmol/kg body weight, i.v.) of TRH ( ) and its [pyridinium²] analogue with n=1 ( ) administered in its prodrug form upon varying the time for pentobarbital treatment (60 mg/kg body weight, i.p.) post-drug administration. * indicates statistically significant differences (ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, P<0.05) from vehicle control. Reprinted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society.

Figure 7. Concentration of the [pyridinium²]TRH analogue with n=1 (i.p. injection of its prodrug at a dose of 15 mg/kg body weight) in the hippocampus (circles, blue solid line) and in blood (squares, red dashed line) of rats, measured via in vivo microdialysis sampling followed by LC/ESI-MS/MS assay. Reprinted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society

Figure 7. Concentration of the [pyridinium²]TRH analogue with n=1 (i.p. injection of its prodrug at a dose of 15 mg/kg body weight) in the hippocampus (circles, blue solid line) and in blood (squares, red dashed line) of rats, measured via in vivo microdialysis sampling followed by LC/ESI-MS/MS assay. Reprinted with permission from [63]. ©2004 American Chemical Society

This observation was in good agreement with the pharmacokinetics (PK) and brain uptake/retention profile expected for and actually manifested by the prodrug approach, according to the concentrations measured in the brain and blood for the most potent analogue (n=1) after the i.p. injection of its prodrug to rats. To obtain the PK and brain uptake/retention profiles, we used in vivo microdialysis to continuously and simultaneously collect samples from the extracellular space of the hippocampus and from the jugular vein. High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-MS/MS) [58] was used to measure the concentrations of the analogue (n=1) in the hippocampus and in the blood. As shown in Figure 7, both the brain and blood concentrations of the TRH analogue reached its maximum within 30–50 min after drug administration. The measured highest extracellular level of the analogue in the hippocampus was about 3–4-times lower than its concentration in the blood; the first-order rate constant for its subsequent elimination from the systemic circulation was, however, about 3-times higher (1.62 h^-1) than from the specified CNS location (0.59 h^-1). Therefore, the concentration of this TRH analogue in the hippocampus and in the blood became equal around 120–150 min, and the CNS level of this compound was approximately 6-times higher than its concentration in the systemic circulation 4 hours after i.p. administration of its prodrug.

Overall, we consider this agent having a central pyridinium residue (n=1, Figure 4) as a novel type of prodrug-amenable lead for exclusively centrally acting and metabolically stable TRH analogues. It is also noteworthy that the prodrugs of the [pyridnium²]analogues, unlike the very lipophilic CNS-targeting prodrug of [Leu²]TRH shown in Figure 2, can easily be formulated in an aqueous vehicle. In addition, they do not raise alert when subjected to Lipinski’s rule-of-five [59].

3.2. [Glu²]TRH analogues with pGlu-modification strategy

After evaluating the promising, exclusively CNS-active TRH analogue shown in Figure 4, we became interested in probing whether a prodrug-amenable pyridinium analogue retaining or perhaps selectively enhancing certain CNS-actions could also be obtained from [Glu²]TRH as a lead compound. For the latter tripeptide, we decided to substitute its N-terminal pGlu because the therapeutically most successful analogues have been derived via such a modification of TRH. For example, 1-methyl-(S)-4,5-dihydroorotyl-l-histidyl-l-prolinamide (taltirelin, TA-0910) has received approval (Ceredist®, Japan) for the treatment of adult spinal muscular atrophy [69]. Additionally, we had also confirmed that aliphatic ester prodrugs (especially Hex) significantly improved CNS targeting of this peptide (Table 2). Therefore, we decided to keep the Glu-Pro-NH₂ motif and replace this time the amino-terminus (pGlu) with a pyridinium-based (Trig) residue and explore the potential of this compound as a CNS-agent (Figure 8) [70]. The presence of Trig and γ-carboxylic acid of Glu in the molecule allowed us for bioreversible “double lipophilization” to obtain (pro)-prodrugs suitable for BBB transport. Analogously to that of design shown in Figure 4, once the prodrugs diffused through the BBB, the dihydropyridine (Dht) undergoes enzymatic oxidation [26] and produces the cationic compounds (with or without the ester group on the side-chain of Glu, depending on the rate of its hydrolysis) whose efflux from the brain is, therefore, prevented (Figure 8).

Using IAMC, we confirmed that although the neutral prodrug, without the ester function on the side-chain of the central residue (Dht-Glu(OH)-Pro-NH₂), improved the affinity of the prodrug to membrane lipids compared to the ionic analogue by approximately three- to five-fold (k’_IAM = 0.4); however, it still showed poor affinity to IAMC. Therefore, a systematic variation of the ester moieties was undertaken that allowed us, again, to find/confirm the optimum for this promoiety to modify the side chain of the Glu residue and yield efficacious prodrugs of Trig-Glu-Pro-NH₂ (Figure 8). In vitro stability studies indicated that the oxidation of the neutral prodrug (Dht-Glu(OR)-Pro-NH₂) to the ionic counterpart occurred faster in mouse brain homogenate (t_1/2=6 min) than in heparinized mouse blood (t_1/2=16 min) that is favorable for promoting CNS-retention. On the other hand, a slower hydrolysis of the ester in the mouse brain homogenate (e.g., t_1/2=27 min for the Hex ester) implied a sustained formation of the [Glu²]TRH analogue depicted in Figure 8 in the brain and thus, long-lasting CNS-mediated pharmacological effects may be expected. Additionally, the metabolic stability (<10% degradation in 2h) of the analogue (Trig-Glu(OH)-Pro-NH₂)was also confirmed.

The analeptic action of Trig-Glu(OH)-Pro-NH₂ (Figure 8) was used to optimize the efficacy of this potential CNS agent when administered i.v. in its CNS-permeable prodrug forms (Dht-Glu(OR)-Pro-NH₂) obtained via reduction of the pyridinium moiety (Trig) to the neutral dihydropyridine (Dht) and esterifying the central Glu with various alcohols (R-OH) [70]. The maximum effect in antagonizing pentobarbital-induced narcosis in mice (18 ± 2 % decrease compared to that of saline control counted as 100%) was, again, achieved with the administration of the hexyl ester prodrug, Dht-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂ (Table 4). This prodrug also showed quite high k’_IAM value (28.6). It is noteworthy, that the hexyl ester prodrug of the parent [Glu²]TRH was approximately twice as potent in reversing the effect of the cholinergic challenge than that of the analogous prodrug of Trig-Glu(OH)-Pro-NH₂. As such, the latter evoked practically the same sleeping time as the unmodified [Glu²]TRH per se (Table 4). As proof-of-concept, we also tested Trig-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂ (the hexyl ester of the designed [Trig¹] analogue of [Glu²]TRH) without reducing Trig to Dht and, thus, rendering the molecule neutral. As expected, no pharmacological response was observed with this ionic compound due to its inability to diffuse through the BBB.

Table 4. Comparison of analeptic (equimolar dose of 10 µmol/kg body weight, i.v.) and antidepressant (equimolar dose of 3 of µmol/kg body weight, i.v) effects of test compounds in mice. Values are expressed as percent decrease compared to those of saline vehicle that was counted as 100%. *Statistically significant difference from saline control (ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s, P < 0.05, n=6–16). Reprinted with permission from [70], ©2005 Bentham Science.

Table 4. Comparison of analeptic (equimolar dose of 10 µmol/kg body weight, i.v.) and antidepressant (equimolar dose of 3 of µmol/kg body weight, i.v) effects of test compounds in mice. Values are expressed as percent decrease compared to those of saline vehicle that was counted as 100%. *Statistically significant difference from saline control (ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s, P < 0.05, n=6–16). Reprinted with permission from [70], ©2005 Bentham Science.

Compound	Analeptic Effect:% Decrease in Sleeping Time	Porsolt Swim Test:% Decrease in Immobility
TRH: pGlu-His-Pro-NH2	50±2*	36±2*
Glu2[TRH]: pGlu-Glu-Pro-NH2	17±2*	33±4*
pGlu-Glu(OHex)–Pro-NH2	37±3*	44±2*
Dht-Glu(OHex)–Pro-NH2	18±2*	43±3*
Trig-Glu(OHex)–Pro-NH2	1±3	2±1

Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the brain delivery concept for a [Glu²]TRH analogue, Trig-Glu-Pro-NH₂, by prodrug design.

Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the brain delivery concept for a [Glu²]TRH analogue, Trig-Glu-Pro-NH₂, by prodrug design.

We selected the “best-performing” Dht-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂ prodrug in the above experimental paradigm for a subsequent comparative neuropharmacological evaluation with pGlu-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂, the hexyl ester prodrug of the parent [Glu²]TRH (Figure 3). Specifically, we employed the Porsolt swim test (PST) [70], an established behavioral paradigm to screen compounds for antidepressant activity and potency in rodents (Table 4). TRH and related peptides are well known to possess antidepressant effect [29,32]. In PST, we used mice that are put individually in an inescapable cylinder of water for a given period of time, and the time (duration) that they swim until remain floating (immobile) is measured. Immobility is considered to reflect a "depressive mood." In the control group, animals are injected with saline only. Reduction in the duration of immobility time by the test compounds compared to that of saline-injected animals is considered an antidepressant-like effect. Table 4 shows that administration of Dht-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂ (3 µmol/kg body weight, i.v.) afforded significant reduction in the immobility time—identical to that of pGlu-Glu(OHex)-Pro-NH₂, the “best-performing” [Glu²]TRH prodrug in regard of evoking analeptic effect compared to the saline control (Table 2). At the same time, it is noteworthy that the analeptic effect of the latter was significantly (by 200%) higher. Therefore, this observation has indicated that the analeptic and antidepressant activity can be dissociated. Additionally, both prodrugs outperformed TRH in the test employed. As expected, no pharmacological effect was recorded in the PST without rendering the hexyl ester of the [Trig¹] analogue “neutral” and, thus, eliminating the permanent positive charge by reducing Trig to Dht, in spite of the significantly increased lipid-membrane affinity. Taken together, Trig-Glu(OH)-Pro-NH₂ may represent a centrally active TRH analogue with improved selectivity of its CNS-action and a lead for a novel type of antidepressants.

4. Conclusions

References and Notes

1. Begley, D.J.; Brightman, M.W. Progress in Drug Research; Prokai, L., Prokai-Tatrai, K., Eds.; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 2003; Vol. 61, Chapter 2, pp. 39–78. [Google Scholar]
2. Brownlees, J.; Williams, C.H. Peptidases, Peptides, and the Mammalian Blood-Brain Barrier. J. Neurochem. 1993, 60, 793–803. [Google Scholar]
3. Tatsuta, T.; Naito, M.; Oh-Hara, T.; Sugawara, I.; Tsuruo, T. Functional Involvement of P-glycoprotein in Blood-Brain Barrier. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 28, 20383–20391. [Google Scholar]
4. Golden, P.L.; Pardridge, W.M. Brain Microvascular P-glycoprotein and a Revised Model of Multidrug Resistance in Brain. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2000, 20, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Taylor, E.M. The Impact of Efflux Transporters in the Brain on the Development of Drugs for CNS Disorders. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2002, 41, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Temsamani, J.; Scherrmann, J.M.; Reesa, A. R.; Kaczore, M. Brain Drug Delivery Technologies: Novel Approaches for Transporting Therapeutics. Pharm. Sci. Technolo. Today 2000, 3, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Fortin, D. Progress in Drug Research; Prokai, L., Prokai-Tatrai, K., Eds.; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 2003; Vol. 61, Chapter 4; pp. 125–154. [Google Scholar]
8. Pardridge, W.M.; Eisenberg, J.; Yamada, T. Human Blood-Brain Barrier Insulin Receptor. J. Neurochem. 1985, 44, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar]
9. Tsuji, A. Small Molecular Drug Transfer Across the Blood–Brain Barrier via Carrier-Mediated Transport Systems. NeuroRx 2005, 1, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Pardridge, W.M. Blood–Brain Barrier Delivery of Protein and Non-Viral Gene Therapeutics with Molecular Trojan Horses. J. Controll. Release 2007, 122, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Kreuter, J. Application of Nanoparticles for the Delivery of Drugs to the Brain. Int. Congress Series 2005, 1277, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Huynh, G.H.; Deen, D. F.; Szoka, F.C. Barriers to Carrier Mediated Drug and Gene Delivery to Brain. J. Controll. Release 2006, 110, 236–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Albert, A. Chemical Aspects of Selective Toxicity. Nature 1958, 182, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Anand, B.S.; Dey, S.; Mitra, A.K. Current Prodrug Strategies via Membrane Transporters/Receptors. Exp. Opin. Ther. Biol. 2002, 2, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Levin, V.A. Relationship of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient, and Molecular Weight to Rat Brain Capillary Permeability. J. Med. Chem. 1980, 23, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Partridge, W.M. Blood-Brain Barrier Biology, and Methodology. J. Neurovirol. 2000, 5, 556–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Abraham, M.H.; Chadha, H.S.; Mitchell, R.C. Hydrogen-Bonding. Part 36. Determination of Blood Brain Distribution Using Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients. Drug Dis. Discov. 1995, 13, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
18. Habgood, M.D.; Begley, D.J.; Abbott, N.J. Determination of Passive Drug Entry into the Central Nervous System. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2000, 20, 231–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Banks, W.A.; Kastin, A.J. Peptides and the Blood-Brain Barrier: Lipophilicity as a Predictor of Permeability. Brain Res. Bull. 1985, 15, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Hansch, C.; Björkroth, J.P.; Leo, A. Hydrophobicity and Central Nervous System Agents: On the Principle of Minimal Hydrophobicity in Drug Design. J. Pharm. Sci. 1987, 76, 663–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Tatsuta, T.; Naito, M.; Oh-Hara, T.; Sugawara, I.; Tsuruo, T. Functional Involvement of P-glycoprotein in Blood-Brain Barrier. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 28, 20383–20391. [Google Scholar]
22. Bak, A.; Gudmundsson, O.S.; Friis, G.J.; Shiahaan, T.J.; Borchardt, R.T. Acyloxy-Alkoxy-Based Cyclic Prodrugs of Opioid Peptides: Evaluation of the Chemical and Enzymatic Stability as well as Their Transport Properties Across Caco-2 Cell Monolayers. Pharm. Res. 1999, 16, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Begley, D. J. The Blood-Brain Barrier: Principles for Targeting Peptides and Drugs to the Central Nervous System. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Prokai, L.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Ouyang, X.; Kim, H.S.; Wu, W.M.; Zharikova, A.D.; Bodor, N. Metabolism-Based Brain-Targeting System for a Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogue. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4563–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Prokai, L.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Bodor, N. Targeting Drugs to the Bain by Redox Chemical Delivery Systems. Med. Res. Rev. 2000, 20, 367–416. [Google Scholar]
26. Bodor, N.; Farag, H.H.; Brewster, M. E. Site-Specific, Sustained Release of Drugs to the Brain. Science 1981, 214, 1370–1372. [Google Scholar]
27. Zlokovic, B.V.; Segal, M.B.; Begley, D.J.; Davson, H.; Rakic, L. Permeability of the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid and the Blood-Brain Barriers to Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone. Brain Res. 1985, 358, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Prokai, L. Progress in Drug Research; Jucker, E., Ed.; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 2002; Vol. 59, Chapter 5, pp. 133–170. [Google Scholar]
29. Schally, A.V.; Bowers, C.Y.; Redding, T.W.; Barrett, J.F. Isolation of Thyrotropin Releasing Factor (TRF) from Porcine Hypothalamus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1966, 25, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Böler, J.; Enzmann, F.; Folkers, K.; Bowes, C.Y.; Schally, A.V. The Identity of Chemical and Hormonal Properties of the Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone and Pyroglutamyl-Histidyl-Proline Amide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1969, 37, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
31. Griffiths, E.C. Thyrotrophin Releasing Hormone: Endocrine and Central Effects. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1985, 10, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Takeuchi, Y.; Matsushita, H.; Kawano, H.; Sakai, H.; Yoshimoto, K.; Sawada, T. TRH Increases Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentration of Kynurenine. Neuroreport 1999, 10, 3601–3603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Breese, G.; Cott, J.; Cooper, B.; Prange, A.; Lippton, M.; Plotnikoff, N. Effects of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone (TRH) on Actions of Actions of Pentobarbital and Other Centrally Active Drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1975, 193, 11–22. [Google Scholar]
34. Hinkle, P.M.; Pekary, A.E.; Senanayaki, S.; Sattin, A. Role of TRH Receptors as Possible Mediators of Analeptic Actions of TRH-Like Peptides. Brain Res. 2002, 935, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
35. Schmidt, D. Effects of Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone (TRH) on Pentobarbital-Induced Decrease in Cholinergic Neuronal Activity. Commun. Psychopharm. 1977, 1, 469–473. [Google Scholar]
36. Miyamoto, M.; Nagai, Y.; Narumi, S.; Saji, Y.; Nagawa, Y. TRH and its Novel Analog (DN-1417): Antipentobarbital Action and Involvement of Cholinergic Mechanisms. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1982, 17, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Bassiri, R. M.; Utiger, R.D. Metabolism and Excretion of Exogenous Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in Humans. J. Clin. Invest. 1981, 52, 1616–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
38. Redding, T.W.; Schally, A.V. On the Half Life of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in Rats. Neuroendocrinology 1972, 9, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Kelly, J.A.; Slator, G.R.; Tipton, K.F.; Williams, C.H.; Karl, Bauer. Kinetic Investigation of the Specificity of Porcine Brain Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone-Like Peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 16746–16751. [Google Scholar]
40. Zlokovic, B.V.; Segal, M.B.; Begley, D.J.; Davson, H.; Rakic, L. Permeability of the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid and the Blood-Brain Barriers to Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone. Brain Res. 1985, 358, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Pekary, A.E.; Sattina, A.; Meyerhoff, J.L.; Chilingar, M. Valproate Modulates TRH Receptor, TRH and TRH-like Peptide Levels in Rat Brain. Peptides 2004, 25, 647–658. [Google Scholar]
42. Szirtes, T.L.; Kisfaludi, L.; Palosi, E.; Szporny, L. Synthesis of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues. 1. Complete Dissociation of Central Nervous System Effect from Thyrotropin-Releasing Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Nillni, E.A.; Sevarino, K.A. The Biology of Pro-Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone-Derived Peptides. Endocr. Rev. 1999, 20, 599–648. [Google Scholar]
44. Stenly Jr., S.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L. Rapid Screening of Combinatorial Libraries by Mass Spectrometry: A Novel Approach for Monitoring Substrate Specificity of Enzymes. Anal. Chem. 2005, 7, 698–701. [Google Scholar]
45. Fischer, W.; Spiess, J. Identification of a Mammalian Glutaminyl Cyclase Converting Glutaminyl into Pyroglutaminyl Peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 3628–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
46. Lambeir, A.M.; Durinx, C.; Scharpé, S.; De Meester, I. Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV from Bench to Bedside: An Update on Structural Properties, Functions, and Clinical Aspects of the Enzyme DPP IV. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2003, 40, 209–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Polgar, L. Structure-Function of Prolyl Oligopeptidase and its Role in Neurological Disorders. Curr. Med. Chem. CNS Agents 2002, 2, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
48. Kenny, A. J.; Booth, A. G.; George, S. G.; Ingram, J.; Kershaw, D.; Wood, E. J.; Young, A. R. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV, a Kidney Brush-Border Serine Peptidase. Biochem. J. 1965, 157, 169–182. [Google Scholar]
49. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Prokai, L.; Bodor, N. Brain-Targeted Delivery of a Leucine-Enkephalin Analogue by Retrometabolic Design. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4775–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Kim, H.S.; Prokai., L. The Utility of Oligopeptidase in Brain-Targeting Delivery of an Enkephalin Analogue by Prodrug Design. Open Med. Chem. J. 2008, 2, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Cocle, S. M.; Aitken, A.; Beg, F.; Smyth, D.G. A Novel Peptide, Pyroglutamylglutamylproline, in the Rabbit Prostate Complex Structurally Related to Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 7788–7791. [Google Scholar]
52. Rondeel, J.M.M.; Klootwijk, W.; Linkels, E.; van de Greef, W.J.; Visser, T. Neural Differentiation of the Human Neuroblastoma Cell-Line IMR32 Induces Production of a Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone-Like Peptide. Brain Res. 1994, 665, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
53. Pekary, A.E.; Meyerhoff, J. L.; Sattin, A. Electroconvulsive Seizures Modulate Levels of Thyrotopin Releasing Hormone and Related Peptides in Rat Hypothalamus, Cingulate and Lateral Cerebellum. Brain Res. 2000, 884, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
54. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Nguyen, V.; Zharikova, A.D.; Braddy, A.C.; Stevens, S.M., Jr.; Prokai, L. Prodrugs to Enhance Central Nervous System Effects of the TRH-like Peptide pGlu-Glu-Pro-NH₂ Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1011–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
55. Ong, S.W.; Liu, H.L.; Pidgeon, C. Immobilized-Artificial-Membrane Chromatography: Measurements of Membrane Partition Coefficient and Predicting Drug Membrane Permeability. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 728, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
56. Braddy, A.C.; Janáky, T.; Prokai, L. Immobilized Artificial Membrane Chromatography Coupled with Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 966, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Prokai, L.; Zharikova, A.D.; Janáky, T.; Li, X.; Braddy, A.C.; Perjési, P.; Matveeva, L.; Powell, D.H.; Prokai-Tatrai, K. Integration of Mass Spectrometry into Early-Phase Discovery and Development of Central Nervous System Agents. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2001, 36, 1211–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Setting. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
59. Moriguchi, I.; Hirono, S.; Liu, Q; Nakagome, I.; Matsushita, Y. Simple Method of Calculating Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
60. Rivier, J.; Burgus, R.; Vale, W.; Ling, N.; Monahan, M. Synthetic Thyrotropin-Releasing Factor Analogs. 3. Effect of Replacement or Modification of Histidine Residue on Biological-Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
61. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Perjesi, P.; Zharikova, A.D.; Li, X.; Prokai, L. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel, Centrally-Acting Thyrotropin-Rleasin Hormone Analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2171–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
62. Prokai, L.; Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Zharikova, A.D.; Nguyen, V.; Stevens, S.M., Jr. Centrally-Acting and Metabolically Stable Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues by Replacement of Histidine with Substituted Pyridinium. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6025–6033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
63. Eda, M. E.; Kurth, M. J. Polymer Site-Site Interactions: Mechanistic Implication in the Solid-Phase Zincke Reaction. Chem. Commun. 2001, 723–724. [Google Scholar]
64. Ghose, A. K.; Pritchett, A.; Crippen, G. M. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for 3-Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity-Relationships. 3. Modeling Hydrophobic Interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 1988, 9, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
65. Bodor, N.; Gabanyi, Z.; Wong, C. K. A New Method for the Estimation of Partition-Coefficient. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3783–3786.67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
66. Buchwald, P.; Bodor, N. Octanol-Water Partition of Nonzwitterionic Peptides: Predictive Power of a Molecular Size-Based Model. Proteins 1998, 30, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
67. Prokai, L.; Zharikova, A.D. Neuropharmacodynamic Evaluation of Centrally Active Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone Analogue [Leu²]TRH and its Chemical Brain Targeting System. Brain Res. 2002, 952, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
68. Brown, W. M. Taltirelin (Tanabe Seiyaku). IDrugs 2001, 4, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar]
69. Prokai-Tatrai, K.; Teixido, M.; Nguyen, V.; Zharikova, A.D.; Prokai, L. A Pyridinium-Substituted Analogue of the TRH-Like Tripeptide pGlu-Glu-Pro-NH₂ and its Prodrugs as Central Nervous System Agents. Med. Chem. 2005, 1, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
70. Porsolt, R.D.; Le Pichon, M.; Jalfre, M. Depression: A New Animal Model Sensitive to Antidepressant Treatment. Nature 1977, 266, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]