Next Article in Journal
The Evolution of Self-Gravitating Radiating Geodesic Fluid Spheres Instantaneously Admitting a Time-like Killing
Previous Article in Journal
The Rose Model of Water: Linking Theory and Simulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
“The Creative Force of Mathematical Formulations”: Werner Heisenberg and the Past, Present, and Future of Quantum Theory
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Process and Space

Collective Intelligence Laboratory, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON N0A 1E0, Canada
Entropy 2026, 28(6), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/e28060683 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 January 2026 / Revised: 27 May 2026 / Accepted: 11 June 2026 / Published: 13 June 2026

Abstract

From the perspective of process, time may be viewed as that which marks the occurrence of change, as previously proposed by this author. In contrast, spatial distinctions may be viewed as enabling the individuation and counting of events generated by processes. Following a conceptual discussion of Whitehead’s process theory, temporal distinctions, and spatial distinctions, a formal model of spacetime as history is presented based upon process actionsas generators of spacetime, and a new geometric concept of `thereness’ is introduced. Each process action propagates information to the next generation (time) and to a particular `there’ (space). This generates a mixed multigraph where the directed subgraph represents the timelike component (causal propagation of information) and the undirected subgraph represents the spacelike component (informational correlations arising from common causes). A spatial position is an equivalence class of generated events; thus, it is emergent. Each spacetime is local to its generating process, consistent with the concept of local becoming proposed by Arthur. If the set of process actions forms a commutative monoid, then the resulting spacetime takes the form of a discrete lattice. It is speculated that the intransitivity and incompleteness of the spacelike subgraph may be linked to the presence of contextuality.
Keywords: process algebra; process; generativity; temporal distinction; spatial distinction; spacetime history; mixed multigraphs; transience; local becoming; contextuality, locality; realism process algebra; process; generativity; temporal distinction; spatial distinction; spacetime history; mixed multigraphs; transience; local becoming; contextuality, locality; realism

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sulis, W. Process and Space. Entropy 2026, 28, 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28060683

AMA Style

Sulis W. Process and Space. Entropy. 2026; 28(6):683. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28060683

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sulis, William. 2026. "Process and Space" Entropy 28, no. 6: 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28060683

APA Style

Sulis, W. (2026). Process and Space. Entropy, 28(6), 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28060683

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop