On Intention and Fluctuations in the Coordination Dynamics of Animate Movement

Many of life’s biggest dilemmas can be summed up as a tension between holding on and letting go. The very language evokes a notion of intentionality which, for the most part, has evaded scientific understanding. How might we even get a window into it? Important insights have come from a seemingly simple task: wiggling one’s fingers to and fro to the beat of a metronome. As the metronome pace increases to some critical frequency, one coordinative pattern becomes unstable and switches spontaneously to another. Such transitions are typically preceded by critical fluctuations, a predicted feature of self-organization in complex, dynamical systems. Here we address the nature and source of these fluctuations, usually assumed to be: (1) random; (2) of external origin; and (3) of fixed magnitude. We performed an experiment in which participants were instructed to oscillate their fingers in either an in-phase or anti-phase pattern in time with a metronome and instructed them to either “hold-on” or “let-go” should they feel the pattern begin to change, yielding a 2 by 2 within-subjects design. We observed that as the metronome frequency was increased from 1.00 to 3.00 Hz, fluctuations in the relative phase between the fingers were significantly altered both by the starting coordinative pattern as well as the participant’s intention to “hold it on” or “let it go”. Specifically, the intention to hold on to the anti-phase pattern delayed the spontaneous transition to in-phase, an effect that was paired with increased fluctuations beyond the critical frequency. These observations were analyzed under the extended Haken–Kelso–Bunz (HKB) model which describes the non-linear stochastic dynamics of the order parameter (relative phase) as a gradient descent on a certain potential. Our analysis, in line with experimental results, suggests that intention transforms the HKB potential not only by stabilizing unstable coordination states but also (paradoxically) by increasing fluctuations around them. Such findings may offer new interpretative light on the relation between intention and fluctuations in the coordination dynamics of living things.