You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Entropy
  • Article
  • Open Access

21 March 2025

On the Stochastic Motion Induced by Magnetic Fields in Random Environments

,
,
and
1
School of Liberal Studies, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Republic of Korea
2
DigiQuay Company Ltd., Seoul 06552, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Physics, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Collection Foundations of Statistical Mechanics

Abstract

Here, we study the Navier–Stokes equation for the motion of a passive particle based on the Fokker–Planck equation in an incompressible conducting fluid induced by a magnetic field subject to an exponentially correlated Gaussian force in three-time domains. For the hydro-magnetic case of velocity and the time-dependent magnetic field, the mean squared velocity for the joint probability density of velocity and the magnetic field has a super-diffusive form that scales as t 3 in t > > τ , while the mean squared displacement for the joint probability density of velocity and the magnetic field reduces to time t 4 in t < < τ . The motion of a passive particle for τ = 0 and t > > τ behaves as a normal diffusion with the mean squared magnetic field being < h 2 ( t ) > t . In a short-time domain t < < τ , the moment in the magnetic field of the incompressible conducting fluid undergoes super-diffusion with μ 2 , 0 , 2 h t 6 , in agreement with our research outcome. Particularly, the combined entropy H ( v , h , t ) ( H ( h , v , t ) ) for an active particle with the perturbative force has a minimum value of ln t 2 ( ln t 2 ) in t > > τ ( τ = 0 ), while the largest displacement entropy value is proportional to ln t 4 in t < < τ and τ = 0 .

1. Introduction

Past studies have utilized the Navier–Stokes equation to model fluid motion, incorporating viscosity and pressure terms to capture the intricate dynamics. The Navier–Stokes equation considers viscous flow, with its characteristic friction and drag, unlike the Euler equation, which models frictionless, inviscid flow. The Navier–Stokes equation has attracted much interest in various scientific systems, and examples of such systems are utilized to model and analyze the weather, ocean currents, water flow, pipe flow, and air flow. In addition, the Navier–Stokes equation, in its full and simplified form, is applied in regions ranging from the microscopic fluid study of blood flow [1,2] and the analysis of convective or diffusing pollution to the macroscopic design of power stations, the modelling of magneto-hydrodynamics, the design of aircraft and cars, and many other problems. Examples of models recently include the large-eddy simulations [3,4] and the fluid–particle coupling methods [5], and the cut-cell and ghost-cell methods [6,7,8].
On the other hand, the theoretical formulation of turbulence has involved plausibility and approximation for the compressible fluids [9] for over eight decades. Wyld [10] formulated the theory of turbulence, introducing a method of systematic perturbation similar to quantum field theory. Lee [11] described the generalization of Wyld’s formulation to the hydromagnetic equations in the theory of stationary, homogeneous, isotropic turbulence in compressible fluids and the solution for velocity and magnetic fields in the form of perturbation series. In the past, Forster, Nelson, and Stephen [12,13] have argued that the renormalization group theory applies to large-displacement, long-duration behavior of velocity correlations generalized by the Navier–Stokes equation for a randomly incompressible fluid. In particular, to obtain their results, they applied a forced Burger’s equation in one dimension, even though the physical understanding of the Navier–Stokes equation below two dimensions is not clear. As popular and well-known models, Antonov et al. [14,15] coupled the Kazantsev–Kraichnan velocity ensemble describing the environment to three different models: the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang (including Navier–Stokes equation) model, the Hwa–Kardar model, and the Pavlik model. They have shown a significant effect that leads to the induction of a non-linearity or the generation of an anisotropic scaling via the field theoretical renormalization group analysis. Meanwhile, Navier–Stokes turbulence [16] has been receiving attention in two-dimensional dynamical experiments for many years. Examples regarding two-dimensional Navier–Stokes turbulence are soap film flow [17,18], rotating fluids [19], magnetically forced stratified fluids [20], two-fluid hydrodynamics [21], and plasma in the equatorial ionosphere [22]. The fractional Brownian diffusion equation motion [23], the fractional generalized Langevin equation, and Fokker–Planck equations [24,25,26,27,28,29] have been used to theoretically and numerically discuss and analyze the motion of passive and active particles.
In this paper, we derive the Fokker–Planck equation. In Section 2, we find the joint probability density in the limits of t < < τ , t > > τ and for τ = 0 , where τ is correlation time [30]. In Section 3, the kurtosis, the correlation coefficient, the entropy, the combined entropy, and the moment-from-moment equation are numerically calculated. In Section 4, we provide an account of our conclusions, summarizing our key findings.

3. Moment Equation, Kurtosis, Correlation Coefficient, Moment, and Entropy

We derive the moment equations [30] for μ l , m , n v and μ l , m , n h of velocity and the magnetic field as follows:
d μ l , m , n v d t = ( l 1 ) μ l 1 , m + 1 , n + α 2 n ( n 1 ) μ l , m , n 2 + m 2 μ l , m , n 2 l ( l 1 ) μ l 2 , m + 1 , n + 1 + e m l ( l 1 ) μ l 2 , m , n r 1 m μ l , m , n β μ l + 1 , m 1 , n α 1 b ( t ) l m μ l 1 , m 1 , n + α 1 a ( t ) m ( n 1 ) μ l , m 2 , n ,
d μ l , m , n h d t = ( l 1 ) μ l 1 , m + 1 , n k m μ l + 1 , m 1 , n a 1 d ( t ) l m μ l 1 , m 1 , n + a 1 c ( t ) m ( m 1 ) μ l , m 2 , n + n l μ l 1 , m + 1 , n + ε n l ( l 1 ) μ l 2 , m , n 1 r 2 n μ l , m , n + a 2 c ( t ) n ( n 1 ) μ l , m , n 2 .
Here, d d t μ l , m , n v = + d x + d v + d h P ( x , v , h ) x l v m h n . We calculate μ 2 , 2 , 0 ,   μ 2 , 0 , 2 ,   μ 0 , 2 , 2 from Equations (103) and (104), and the other values will be published elsewhere.
The kurtosis for displacement and velocity, respectively, are given by
K x = < x 4 > / 3 < x 2 > 2 1 ,   K v = < v 4 > / 3 < v 2 > 2 1 ,   K h = < h 4 > / 3 < h 2 > 2 1 .
We can write the correlation coefficients as
ρ x , v = < ( x < x > ) ( v < v > ) > / σ x σ v ,   ρ x , h = < ( x < x > ) ( h < h > ) > / σ v σ h , ρ v , h = < ( v < v > ) ( h < h > ) > / σ v σ h .
Here, we assume that a passive particle initially starts at x = x 0 , v = v 0 , and h = h 0 at time t = 0 . The parameters σ v and σ h are the root mean squared values for velocity and the magnetic field of joint probability density, respectively. Lastly, the entropies S ( x , t ) and S ( v , t ) , respectively, can be calculated as follows:
S ( x , t ) = p ( x , t ) ln p ( x , t ) ,   S ( v , t ) = p ( v , t ) ln p ( v , t ) .
The combined entropy is expressed as
H ( x , v , t ) d x d v p ( x , t ) p ( v , t ) ln p ( x , t ) p ( v , t ) .
Entropy refers to a numerical representation of the reliability or quantity of information [34,35] that has a probability distribution; in a probability distribution, as the probability of a particular value increases and the probability of the remaining value decreases, the entropy decreases.

4. Summary

In summary, we have derived the Fokker–Planck equation in an incompressible conducting fluid induced by a magnetic field. We approximately obtained the solution of the joint probability density by using double Fourier transforms. In the hydro-magnetic case of two variables, i.e., velocity and a time-dependent magnetic field, the mean squared velocity for the joint probability density of velocity and a magnetic field has a super-diffusive form with time t 3 in t > > τ , while the mean squared displacement for the joint probability density of velocity and the magnetic field reduces to time t 4 in t < < τ . The motion of a passive particle for τ = 0 and t > > τ behaves as a normal diffusion with a mean squared magnetic field < h 2 ( t ) > t . In the short time domain t < < τ , the moment for an incompressible conducting fluid induced by a magnetic field becomes super-diffusive [36], with μ 2 , 0 , 2 h t 6 , consistent with our results. In particular, for τ = 0 , μ 2 , 2 , 0 v ( μ 2 , 0 , 2 v , μ 0 , 2 , 2 v ) scales to t 5 ( t 6 , t 3 ), consistent with our results. The combined entropy H ( v , h , t ) ( H ( h , v , t ) ) for an active particle on which the perturbation force acts has a minimum value of ln t 2 ( ln t 2 ) in t > > τ ( τ = 0 ), while the largest displacement entropy value is proportional to ln t 4 in t < < τ and τ = 0 . Table A1 of Appendix A summarizes the results of calculating the kurtosis, the correlation coefficient, the entropy, and the moment of probability density from the equations for two variables, the velocity field and the magnetic field, following the initial state x = x 0 , v = v 0 , h = h 0 . Other values will be published elsewhere.
Despite great interest, the exact solutions for distributions of higher-order processes are rare, but an approximate solution of the probability distribution function is found in this paper. The approximate solution of the Navier–Stokes equations has not been solved to date, but our model provides a simple approximate solution through the Fourier transform. We hope to extend our model in the future to encompass the Navier–Stokes equation, adding the complexity of additional forces to our simulations for a more realistic representation of the system’s dynamics. Our findings allow for comparison and analysis against existing theories [37,38,39,40,41,42] computer simulations [43,44,45], and experimental data. The other results will be continuously published in other journals.

Author Contributions

K.K.: Writing, conceptualization, review, editing, and methodology. Y.J.K.: Review, editing, investigation, table analysis, and funding acquisition. J.W.J. and S.K.S.: Review, editing, investigation, and table analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Wonkwang University in 2025.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors J.-W. Jung, S.K. Seo and K. Kim was employed by the DigiQuay Company Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1 summarizes the kurtosis, the correlation coefficient, and the moment in this paper.
Table A1. Approximate values of the kurtosis, the correlation coefficient, and the moment μ 2 , 2 , 0 , μ 2 , 0 , 2 , μ 0 , 2 , 2 of the velocity field and the magnetic field in three time domains, where a passive particle initially starts at x = x 0 , v = v 0 , and h = h 0 at time t = 0 .
Table A1. Approximate values of the kurtosis, the correlation coefficient, and the moment μ 2 , 2 , 0 , μ 2 , 0 , 2 , μ 0 , 2 , 2 of the velocity field and the magnetic field in three time domains, where a passive particle initially starts at x = x 0 , v = v 0 , and h = h 0 at time t = 0 .
Time Domainv, hx, v,
h
K x , K v , K h ρ x , v , ρ x , h , ρ v , h μ 2 , 2 , 0 , μ 2 , 0 , 2 , μ 0 , 2 , 2 S ( x , t ) , H ( x , v , t )
S ( v , t ) , H ( v , h , t )
S ( h , t ) , H ( h , x , t )
t < < τ vx τ 2 x 0 4 α 1 2 t 8 + τ x 0 2 α 1 t 4 ρ x , v = τ x 0 v 0 α 1 t 7 / 2 μ 2 , 2 , 0 v = α 1 2 τ 2 t 6
μ 2 , 2 , 0 h = α 1 3 τ 3 t 6
ln α 1 t 4 τ , ln α 1 2 t 7 τ 2
v τ 2 v 0 4 α 1 2 t 6 + τ v 0 2 α 1 t 3 ρ x , h = τ x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 3 ln α 1 t 3 τ , ln α 1 α 2 t 6 τ 2
h τ 2 h 0 4 α 2 2 t 6 + τ h 0 2 α 2 t 3 ρ v , h = τ x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 7 / 2 μ 2 , 0 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 τ 2 t 7
μ 2 , 0 , 2 h = α 1 2 α 2 τ 3 t 6
ln α 2 t 3 τ , ln α 1 α 2 t 7 τ 2
hx τ 2 x 0 4 α 1 2 t 8 + τ x 0 2 α 1 t 4 ρ x , v = τ x 0 v 0 α 1 t 5 / 2 ln α 1 t 3 τ , ln α 1 2 t 4 τ 2
v τ 2 v 0 4 α 1 2 t 2 + τ v 0 2 α 1 t 1 ρ x , h = τ x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 3 μ 0 , 2 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 τ 2 t 5
μ 0 , 2 , 2 h = α 1 2 a 2 τ 3 t 5
ln α 1 t τ , ln α 1 α 2 t 3 τ 2
h τ 2 h 0 4 α 2 2 t 4 + τ h 0 2 α 2 t 2 ρ v , h = τ v 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 ε t 3 / 2 ln α 2 t 2 τ , ln α 1 α 2 t 5 τ 2
t > > τ vx x 0 4 α 1 2 t 2 + x 0 2 α 1 t 1 ρ x , v = x 0 v 0 α 1 β t 2 μ 2 , 2 , 0 v = e α 1 β 2 ( r 1 2 ) t 3
μ 2 , 2 , 0 h = α 1 2 t 4
ln α 1 t , ln α 1 2 α 2 β 2 t 2
v v 0 4 α 1 2 β 4 t 2 + v 0 2 α 1 β 2 t 1 ρ x , h = τ x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 β t 2 ln α 1 β 2 t , ln α 1 α 2 β 2 t 2 τ
h τ 2 h 0 4 α 2 2 t 2 + τ h 0 2 α 2 t 1 ρ v , h = v 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 2 μ 2 , 0 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 t 2
μ 2 , 0 , 2 h = α 1 α 2 r 2 t 3
ln α 2 t τ , ln α 1 α 2 t 2 τ
hx x 0 4 α 1 2 τ 2 t 8 + x 0 2 α 1 τ t 4 ρ x , v = τ x 0 v 0 ( α 1 α 2 τ ) 1 / 2 ε t 5 / 2 ln α 1 τ t 2 , ln α 1 2 ε 2 τ t 5
v v 0 4 α 1 2 ε 4 t 6 + v 0 2 α 1 ε 2 t 3 ρ x , h = x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 τ ) 1 / 2 t 2 μ 0 , 2 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 β 2 ( r 1 2 ) τ t 3
μ 0 , 2 , 2 h = α 1 α 2 r 2 τ t 2
ln α 1 ε 2 t 3 , ln α 1 α 2 ε 2 t 5
h h 0 4 α 2 2 t 4 + h 0 2 α 2 t 2 ρ v , h = v 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 ε t 5 / 2 ln α 2 t 2 , ln α 1 α 2 τ t 4
τ = 0 vx x 0 4 α 1 2 r 1 2 t 8 + x 0 2 α 1 r 1 t 4 ρ x , v = x 0 v 0 α 1 r 1 1 / 2 t 5 / 2 μ 2 , 2 , 0 v = α 1 2 r 1 ( r 1 2 ) t 5
μ 2 , 2 , 0 h = α 1 3 τ t 6
ln α 1 r 1 t 4 , ln α 1 2 r 1 t 5
v v 0 4 α 1 2 t 2 + v 0 2 α 1 t 1 ρ x , h = τ x 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 3 / 2 ln α 1 t , ln α 1 α 2 t 3
h h 0 4 α 2 2 t 4 + h 0 2 α 2 t 2 ρ v , h = v 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 r 2 1 / 2 t 3 / 2 μ 2 , 0 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 r 1 τ t 6
μ 2 , 0 , 2 h = α 1 α 2 2 r 2 t 3
ln α 2 t 2 , ln α 1 α 2 r 1 t 6
hx x 0 4 α 1 2 t 6 + x 0 2 α 1 t 3 ρ x , v = x 0 v 0 α 1 t 2 ln α 1 t 3 , ln α 1 2 t 4
v v 0 4 α 1 2 t 2 + v 0 2 α 1 t 1 ρ x , h = x 0 h 0 α 1 t 2 μ 0 , 2 , 2 v = α 1 α 2 ( r 1 2 ) t 3
μ 0 , 2 , 2 h = α 1 2 α 2 r 2 τ t 3
ln α 1 t , ln α 1 α 2 t 2
h h 0 4 α 2 2 t 2 + h 0 2 α 2 t 1 ρ v , h = v 0 h 0 ( α 1 α 2 ) 1 / 2 t 2 ln α 2 t , ln α 1 α 2 t 4

References

  1. Hur, S.C.; Tse, H.T.R.; Di Carlo, D. Sheathless inertial cell ordering for extreme throughput flow cytometry. Lab Chip 2010, 10, 274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Mach, A.J.; Di Carlo, D. Continuous scalable blood filtration device using inertial microfluidics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Piomelli, U.; Balaras, E. Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2002, 34, 349. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bose, S.T.; Park, G.I. Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation for complex turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2018, 50, 535. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hausmann, M.; Elmestikawy, H.; van Wachemar, B. Physically consistent immersed boundary method: A framework for predicting hydrodynamic forces on particles with coarse meshes. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.04722v1. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mittal, R.; Iaccarino, G. Immersed Boundary Methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2005, 37, 239. [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke, D.K.; Hassan, H.A.; Salas, M.D. Euler Calculations for Multielement Airfoils Using Cartesian Grids. AIAA J. 1986, 24, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  8. Majumdar, S.; Iaccarino, G.; Durbin, P. RANS solvers with adaptive structured boundary non-conforming grids. Cent. Turbul. Res. Annu. Res. Briefs 2001, 1, 353. [Google Scholar]
  9. Monin, A.S.; Yaglom, A.M. Statistical Fluid Mechanics; MIT: Cambridge, CA, USA, 1975; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wyld, H.W. Formulation of the theory of turbulence in an incompressible fluid. Ann. Phys. 1961, 14, 143. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, L.L. A formulation of the theory of isotropic hydromagnetic turbulence in an incompressible fluid. Ann. Phys. 1964, 32, 292. [Google Scholar]
  12. Forster, D.; Nelson, D.R.; Stephen, M.J. Large-distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid. Phys. Rev. A 1977, 16, 732. [Google Scholar]
  13. Forster, D.; Nelson, D.R.; Stephen, M.J. Long-Time Tails and the Large-Eddy Behavior of a Randomly Stirred Fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1976, 36, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Antonov, N.V.; Gulitskiy, N.M.; Kakin, P.I.; Lebedev, N.M.; Tumakova, M.M. Field-Theoretic Renormalization Group in Models of Growth Processes, Surface Roughening and Non-Linear Diffusion in Random Environment: Mobilis in Mobili. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Antonov, N.V.; Babakin, A.A.; Gulitskiy, N.M.; Kakin, P.I. Field Theoretic Renormalization Group in an Infinite-Dimensional Model of Random Surface Growth in Random Environment. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.13783v1. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nam, K.; Ott, E.E.; Antonsen, T.M.; Guzdar, P.N. Lagrangian Chaos and the Effect of Drag on the Enstrophy Cascade in Two-Dimensional Turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5134. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rivera, M.; Vorobieff, P.; Ecke, R.E. Turbulence in Flowing Soap Films: Velocity, Vorticity, and Thickness Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 1417. [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin, B.K.; Wu, X.L.; Goldburg, W.I. Spectra of Decaying Turbulence in a Soap Film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 3964. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sommeria, J.; Meyers, S.D.; Swinney, H.L. Laboratory model of a planetary eastward jet. Nature 1989, 337, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Solomon, T.H.; Weeks, E.R.; Swinney, H.L. Observation of anomalous diffusion and Lévy flights in a two-dimensional rotating flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Enz, C.P. Two-fluid hydrodynamic description of ordered systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1974, 46, 705. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kelley, M.C.; Ott, E. Two-dimensional turbulence in equatorial spread. J. Geophys. Res. 1978, 83, 4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mandelbrot, B.B.; van Ness, J.W. Fractional Brownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications. SIAM Rev. 1968, 10, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schneider, W.R.; Wyss, W. Fractional diffusion and wave equations. J. Math. Phys. 1989, 30, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Metzler, R.; Glockle, W.G.; Nonnencher, T.F. Fractional model equation for anomalous diffusion. Physica A 1994, 211, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fogedby, H.C. Lévy flights in quenched random force fields. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fogedby, H.C. Lévy Flights in Random Environments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73, 2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zaslavsky, G.M. Fractional kinetic equation for Hamiltonian chaos. Chaos 1994, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kolwankar, K.M.; Gangal, A.D. Local Fractional Fokker-Planck Equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Heinrichs, J. Probability distributions for second-order processes driven by Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. E 1993, 47, 3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Risken, H. The Fokker—Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Application, Latest ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  32. Athanassoulis, G.A.; Nikolaos, P.; Nikoletatos-Kekatos, N.P.; Mamis, K.I. A systematic path to non-Markovian dynamics II: Probabilistic response of nonlinear multidimensional systems to Gaussian colored noise excitation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.10236. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mamis, K.I. Probabilistic Responses of Dynamical Systems Subjected to Gaussian Colored Noise Excitation. Ph.D. Thesis, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mamis, K.; Farazmand, M. Mitigation of rare events in multistable systems driven by correlated noise. Phys. Rev. E 2021, 104, 034201. [Google Scholar]
  35. Doerries, J.T.J.; Loos, S.A.M.; Klapp, S.H.L. Correlation functions of non-Markovian systems out of equilibrium: Analytical expressions beyond single-exponential memory. J. Stat. Mech. 2021, 2021, 033202. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cherstvy, A.G.; Safdari, H.; Metzler, R. Anomalous diffusion, nonergodicity, and ageing for exponentially and logarithmically time-dependent diffusivity: Striking differences for massive versus massless particles. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 195401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cherstvy, A.G.; Wang, W.; Metzler, R.; Sokolov, I.M. Inertia triggers nonergodicity of fractional Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. E 2021, 104, 024115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Caprini, L.; Marini, U.; Marconi, B.; Vulpiani, A. Linear response and correlation of a self-propelled particle in the presence of external fields. J. Stat. Mech. 2018, 2018, 033203. [Google Scholar]
  39. Caprini, L.; Marconi, U.M.B. Inertial self-propelled particles. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 154, 024902. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sprenger, A.R.; Caprini, L.; Löwen, H.; Wittmann, R. Dynamics of active particles with translational and rotational inertia. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2023, 35, 305101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Spiechowicz, J.; Marchenko, I.G.; Hänggi, P.; Łuczka, J. Diffusion Coefficient of a Brownian Particle in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium: Einstein Model and Beyond. Entropy 2024, 25, 42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Marchesoni, F.; Misko, V.R.; Ghosh, P.K. Narrow Pore Crossing of Active Particles under Stochastic Resetting. Entropy 2023, 25, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boltz, H.H.; Kohler, B.; Ihle, T. Kinetic Theory of Self-Propelled Particles with Nematic Alignment. Entropy 2024, 26, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eichhorn, R. Derivation of the Langevin Equation from the Microcanonical Ensemble. Entropy 2024, 26, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Evstigneev, M.; Kacmazer, D. Fast and Accurate Numerical Integration of the Langevin Equation with Multiplicative Gaussian White Noise. Entropy 2024, 26, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.