Next Article in Journal
A Short Review on Minimum Description Length: An Application to Dimension Reduction in PCA
Previous Article in Journal
Shannon Entropy in LS-Coupled Configuration Space for Ni-like Isoelectronic Sequence
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Electrochemical Stability of Starch Carbon as an Important Property in the Construction of a Lithium-Ion Cell
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Otto Engine for the q-State Clock Model

Entropy 2022, 24(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24020268
by Michel Angelo Aguilera 1, Francisco José Peña 1, Oscar Andrés Negrete 1,2 and Patricio Vargas 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Entropy 2022, 24(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24020268
Submission received: 22 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 February 2022 / Published: 13 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermal Analysis of Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper describes an Otto engine cycle across a phase transition. The model analysed is based on the q-state clock model which allows to interpolate from the 2-D Ising model to more complex interactions.

The results are interesting. Thinking about the cycle; optimal work could be achieved if the  work required fro the cold compression could be decreased by choosing a phase which minimizes the cost of compression.  The opposite should work for the hot  expansion where the phase should be chosen to maximize the output work.

 

 

Author Response

Dear Referee, please see attached pdf,

best regards,

Francisco Peña on behalf of all the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting since the view of point of modeling. However, particularly with the results, I would like to know, how can the authors validate the data obtained? On the paper there is not a comparison with previous studies. Also, what is the main contribution of your paper? Is not clear. Results indicates that in q = 4 the total work extraction of the cycle is highest and for q = 2, there is the lowest. But, what indicates this result? Is necessary strengthen your conclusions.

Author Response

Dear Referee, please see attached pdf,

best regards,

Francisco Peña on behalf of all the authors.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I don´t have comments

Back to TopTop