Next Article in Journal
Feature Selection based on the Local Lift Dependence Scale
Next Article in Special Issue
An Auxiliary Variable Method for Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms in High Dimension
Previous Article in Journal
Scaling-Laws of Flow Entropy with Topological Metrics of Water Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Improved Chaotic Optimization Algorithm Applied to a DC Electrical Motor Modeling
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Entropy 2018, 20(2), 96;

Particle Swarm Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment in Inverse Problems

ETSI en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain
Grupo de Problemas Inversos, Optimización y Aprendizaje Automático, Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain
Laboratoire GET, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, CNES, 31400 Toulouse, France
Bureau Gravimétrique International (BGI), 31401 Toulouse, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 November 2017 / Revised: 9 January 2018 / Accepted: 25 January 2018 / Published: 30 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Probabilistic Methods for Inverse Problems)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1896 KB, uploaded 30 January 2018]   |  


Most inverse problems in the industry (and particularly in geophysical exploration) are highly underdetermined because the number of model parameters too high to achieve accurate data predictions and because the sampling of the data space is scarce and incomplete; it is always affected by different kinds of noise. Additionally, the physics of the forward problem is a simplification of the reality. All these facts result in that the inverse problem solution is not unique; that is, there are different inverse solutions (called equivalent), compatible with the prior information that fits the observed data within similar error bounds. In the case of nonlinear inverse problems, these equivalent models are located in disconnected flat curvilinear valleys of the cost-function topography. The uncertainty analysis consists of obtaining a representation of this complex topography via different sampling methodologies. In this paper, we focus on the use of a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to sample the region of equivalence in nonlinear inverse problems. Although this methodology has a general purpose, we show its application for the uncertainty assessment of the solution of a geophysical problem concerning gravity inversion in sedimentary basins, showing that it is possible to efficiently perform this task in a sampling-while-optimizing mode. Particularly, we explain how to use and analyze the geophysical models sampled by exploratory PSO family members to infer different descriptors of nonlinear uncertainty. View Full-Text
Keywords: inverse problems; nonlinear inversion; noise and regularization; model reduction; uncertainty analysis; particle swarm optimization (PSO) inverse problems; nonlinear inversion; noise and regularization; model reduction; uncertainty analysis; particle swarm optimization (PSO)

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pallero, J.L.G.; Fernández-Muñiz, M.Z.; Cernea, A.; Álvarez-Machancoses, Ó.; Pedruelo-González, L.M.; Bonvalot, S.; Fernández-Martínez, J.L. Particle Swarm Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment in Inverse Problems. Entropy 2018, 20, 96.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top