Virtual Influencers as Brand Endorsers: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Evaluation Scale
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Reviews
2.1. Virtual Influencers
2.2. Anthropomorphic Components of Virtual Influencers
Anthropomorphic Forms of VIs
2.3. Narratives as Strategies of Anthropomorphism
Narrative Strategies of VIs as Brand Ambassadors
3. Methods
3.1. Scale Development Procedure
3.2. Step 1: Generating Preliminary Items for Evaluating VIs as Brand Endorsers
3.2.1. Preliminary Itemization
3.2.2. Sample and Data Collection
4. Results
4.1. Step 2: Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for Construct Identification
4.1.1. Initial Item Reduction
4.1.2. Construct Identification
4.2. Step 3: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for Scale Validation
4.2.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.2.2. Construct Validity
4.2.3. Discriminant Validity
4.3. Step 4: Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the VIE Scale
Second-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. General Discussion of the Results
5.2. Theoretical Implication
5.3. Practical Contribution
5.4. Limitations and Future Research
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dabiran, E.; Farivar, S.; Wang, F.; Grant, G. Virtually human: Anthropomorphism in virtual influencer marketing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 79, 103797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, I.; Ki, C.; Lee, H.; Kim, Y. Virtual influencer marketing: Evaluating the influence of virtual influencers’ form realism and behavioral realism on consumer ambivalence and marketing performance. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 176, 114611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rungruangjit, W.; Mongkol, K.; Piriyakul, I.; Charoenpornpanichkul, K. The power of human-like virtual-influencer-generated content: Impact on consumers’ willingness to follow and purchase intentions. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2024, 16, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guthrie, S.E. Anthropomorphism: A definition and a theory. In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals; Mitchell, R.W., Thompson, N.S., Miles, H.L., Eds.; SUNY Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 50–58. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Lee, Y.H. Unveiling Behind-The-Scenes Human Interventions and Examining Source Orientation in Virtual Influencer Endorsements. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, Aveiro, Portugal, 22 June 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, W.; Quan, W. Eeriness unveiled: A natural language processing investigation of co-presented human and virtual influencers on Instagram. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 21966–21980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.A.; Eastin, M.S. Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2021, 15, 822–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, C.; Yuan, S. Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. J. Interact. Advert. 2019, 19, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, Y.; Chan, K.J.; Lin, J.S. When social media influencers endorse brands: The effect of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive. Intl. J. Adver. 2020, 39, 590–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prentice, C.; Nguyen, M. Robotic service quality—Scale development and validation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golossenko, A.; Pillai, K.G.; Aroean, L. Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2020, 37, 737–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grassini, S. Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): A brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1191628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ao, L.; Bansal, R.; Pruthi, N.; Khaskheli, M.B. Impact of Social Media Influencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Balabanis, G. Meta-analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 41, 394–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.J. Authenticity model of (mass-oriented) computer-mediated communication: Conceptual explorations and testable propositions. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2022, 25, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G. The effects of sponsorship disclosures, advertising knowledge, and message involvement in sponsored influencer posts. Int. J. Advert. 2022, 41, 1502–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Hao, Z.; Li, X. The influence of streamers’ physical attractiveness on consumer responses. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1297369. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, F. Understanding the role of technology attractiveness in promoting social commerce engagement: Moderating effect of personal interest. Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stein, J.; Breves, P.L.; Anders, N. Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likeness. New Media Soc. 2024, 26, 3433–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Park, M. Virtual influencers’ attractiveness effect on purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of the Product: Endorser fit with the brand. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2023, 143, 107703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Li, J. How humanlike is enough? Uncover the underlying mechanism of virtual influencer endorsement. Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans 2024, 2, 100037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Sung, Y. The interplay between human likeness and agency on virtual influencer credibility. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2023, 26, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, C.; Kim, H.K. Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lou, C.; Kiew, S.T.J.; Chen, T.; Lee, T.Y.M.; Ong, J.E.C.; Phua, Z. Authentically fake? How consumers respond to the influence of virtual influencers. J. Advert. 2022, 52, 540–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franke, C.; Groeppel-Klein, A.; Muller, K. Consumers’ responses to virtual influencers as advertising endorsers: Novel and effective or uncanny and deceiving? J. Advert. 2023, 52, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, X.; Yan, X.; Jiang, Y. Making sense? The sensory-specific nature of virtual influencer effectiveness. J. Mark. 2024, 88, 84–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourrig, H.; Park, J.; Becheur, I. How does humanoid virtual influencers’ appearance convey social presence? The underlying process and path to purchase intention. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2025, 49, e70013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.; Kim, D.; E, Z.; Shoenberger, H. The next hype in social media advertising: Examining virtual influencers’ brand endorsement effectiveness. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1089051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, C.; van Doorn, J.; Eggers, F.; Wieringa, J.E. The effect of required warmth on consumer acceptance of artificial intelligence in service: The moderating role of AI-human collaboration. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 66, 102533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Ham, J.; Eastin, M.S. Social media users’ affective, attitudinal, and behavioral responses to virtual human emotions. Telemat. Inf. 2024, 87, 102084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, K.; Zheng, J.; Luo, S. Green power of virtual influencer: The role of virtual influencer image, emotional appeal, and product involvement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 77, 103660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Dickinger, A.; Kam Fung So, K.; Egger, R. Artificial intelligence-generated virtual influencer: Examining the effects of emotional display on user engagement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 76, 103560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, E.; Lovegrove, R. Discordant storytelling, ‘Honest Fakery’, identity peddling: How uncanny CGI characters are jamming public relations and influencer practices. Public Relat. Inq. 2021, 10, 265–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nass, C.; Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 2002, 56, 81–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morewedge, C.K.; Preston, J.; Wegner, D.M. Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 93, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eskine, K.J.; Locander, W.H. A name you can trust? Personification effects are influenced by beliefs about company values. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waytz, A.; Heafner, J.; Epley, N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 52, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacInnis, D.J.; Folkes, V.S. Humanizing brands: When brands seem to be like me, part of me, and in a relationship with me. J. Consum. Psychol. 2017, 27, 355–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blut, M.; Wang, C.; Wunderlich, N.V.; Brock, C. Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 632–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, E.; Zhao, X.; Ullman, D.; Malle, B.F. What is Human-Like? In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, IL, USA, 5 March 2018.
- Go, E.; Sundar, S.S. Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 97, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabed, A.; Javornik, A.; Gregory-Smith, D. AI anthropomorphism and its effect on users’ self-congruence and self–AI integration: A theoretical framework and research agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 182, 121786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Balakrishnan, J.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Das, R. Do chatbots establish “humanness” in the customer purchase journey? An investigation through explanatory sequential design. Psychol. Mark. 2023, 40, 2244–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.Y.; Schmitt, B.H.; Thalmann, N.M. Eliza in the uncanny valley: Anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking. Mark. Lett. 2019, 30, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mende, M.; Scott, M.L.; van Doorn, J.; Grewal, D.; Shanks, I. Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. J. Mark. Res. 2019, 56, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calahorra-Candao, G.; Hoyos, M.J.M. The effect of anthropomorphism of virtual voice assistants on perceived safety as an antecedent to voice shopping. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 153, 108124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, P.; Liang, C. How does anthropomorphism improve human-AI interaction satisfaction: A dual-path model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 148, 107878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David-Ignatieff, A.; Buzeta, C.; De Pelsmacker, P.; Mouelhi, N.B.D. This embodied conversational agent looks very human and as old as I feel! The effect of perceived agent anthropomorphism and consumer-agent age difference on brand attitude. J. Mark. Commun. 2023, 30, 881–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, K.; Martinez, L.F. The impact of anthropomorphism on customer satisfaction in chatbot commerce: An experimental study in the food sector. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 23, 2789–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltaci, F.; Baser, M.Y.; Celik, M. Attitude toward service robots in tourism and hospitality service setting: The effect of multidimensional anthropomorphism and technology readiness. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2024, 26, e2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, V.L.; Fowler, K. Close encounters of the AI kind: Use of AI influencers as brand endorsers. J. Advert. 2021, 50, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ham, J.; Li, S.; Looi, J.; Eastin, M.S. Virtual humans as social actors: Investigating user perceptions of virtual humans’ emotional expression on social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 155, 108161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, S.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, Y. More realistic, More Better? How anthropomorphic images of virtual influencers impact the purchase intentions of consumers. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 3229–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhang, Y. Product-independent or product-dependent: The impact of virtual influencers’ primed identity on purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 84, 104088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Wang, R. Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Virtual Influencers in the Uncanny Valley: Anthropomorphism, Autonomy, and a Multigroup Comparison. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 186, 115024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vo, T.; Tan, G.W.; Pham, N.T.; Truong, T.H.; Ooi, K. Promoting customer engagement and brand loyalty on social media: The role of virtual influencers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2025, 49, e80028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davlembayeva, D.; Chari, S.; Papagiannidis, S. Virtual Influencers in Consumer Behaviour: A Social Influence Theory Perspective. Br. J. Manag. 2024, 36, 202–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Han, Y.; Kandampully, J.; Lu, X. How language arousal affects purchase intentions in online retailing? The role of virtual versus human influencers, language typicality, and trust. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 82, 104106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, G.; Kang, J.; He, L.; Xu, Y. Endorsing alone or with humans: Investigating the impact of virtual influencers’ presentation formats on endorsement effectiveness. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2025, 84, 104248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, K.; Qin, M.; Deng, D.; Zhou, D. Smile or not smile: The effect of virtual influencers’ emotional expression on brand authenticity, purchase intention and follow intention. J. Consum. Behav. 2024, 24, 962–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattar, A.A.; Haq, J.U.; Saleem, A.; Ahmad, W. Shyness vs Confidence: The Effect of Virtual Influencer Personalities on Social Media Users’ Well-Being and Addiction. Psychol. Mark. 2024, 42, 1088–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Disalvo, C.; Gemperle, F.; Forlizzi, J. Imitating the Human Gorm: Four Kinds of Anthropomorphic Form. In Proceedings of the Future Ground, Design Research Society International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 29 November 2004; Available online: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kiesler/anthropomorphism-org/pdf/Imitating.pdf (accessed on 20 December 2024).
- Ho, C.-C.; MacDorman, K.F. Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1508–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutuleac, R.; Baima, G.; Rizzo, C.; Bresciani, S. Will virtual influencers overcome the uncanny valley? The moderating role of social cues. Psychol. Mark. 2024, 41, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epley, N.; Waytz, A.; Akalis, S.; Cacioppo, J.T. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc. Cogn. 2008, 26, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waytz, A.; Cacioppo, J.; Epley, N. Who see human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 5, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hellén, K.; Sääksjärvi, M. Development of a scale measuring childlike anthropomorphism in products. J. Mark. Manag. 2013, 29, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, R.E.; Lee, S.Y. “You are a virtual influencer!”: Understanding the impact of origin disclosure and emotional narratives on parasocial relationship and virtual influencer credibility. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 148, 107897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Chen, H.; Kong, Q. An expert with whom i can identify: The role of narratives in influencer marketing. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 21, 972–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Lee, S. Unlocking trust dynamics: An exploration of playfulness, expertise, and consumer behavior in virtual influencer marketing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2024, 41, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, T.; Wang, W. The virtual new or the real old? The effect of temporal alignment between influencer virtuality and brand heritage narration on consumers’ luxury consumption. Psychol. Mark. 2024, 42, 470–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, K.; Wegner, D.M. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 2012, 125, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sands, C.; Campbell, C.L.; Plangger, K.; Ferraro, C. Unreal influence: Leveraging AI in influencer marketing. Eur. J. Mark. 2022, 56, 1721–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, S.; Cho, H. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, D. The Fascinating World of Instagram’s ‘Virtual’ Celebrities. BBC. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20180402-the-fascinating-world-of-instagrams-virtual-celebrities (accessed on 5 February 2025).
- Tiffany, K. Lil Miquela and the Virtual Influencer Hype, Explained. Vox. Available online: https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/6/3/18647626/instagram-virtual-influencers-lil-miquela-ai-startups (accessed on 5 February 2025).
- Smith, E.R.; Sherrin, S.; Fraune, M.R.; Šabanović, S. Positive emotions, more than anxiety or other negative emotions, predict willingness to interact with robots. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2020, 46, 1270–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, J.; Chuenterawong, P.; Lee, H.; Tian, Y.; Chock, T.M. Human versus virtual influencer: The effect of humanness and interactivity on persuasive CSR messaging. J. Interact. Advert. 2023, 23, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerbing, D.W.; Anderson, J.C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Mark. Res. 1988, 25, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Netemeyer, R.G.; Sharma, S.; Bearden, W.O. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Rummel, R.J. Applied Factor Analysis; Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Mundfrom, D.J.; Shaw, D.G.; Ke, T.L. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int. J. Test. 2005, 5, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noar, S.M. The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 2003, 10, 622–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, K.J.; Ahn, S.J. A systematic review of virtual influencers: Similarities and differences between human and virtual influencers in interactive advertising. J. Interact. Advert. 2023, 23, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dimensions | Attributes | Key Findings | References |
---|---|---|---|
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Structure | Human-likeness (appearance) (visual similarity) | Respondents perceived stronger parasocial interactions (psychological warmth) with more human-like VIs, leading to positive brand attitudes. | Kim et al. (2024) [2] Stein et al. (2024) [19] Kim & Park (2023) [20] Ma & Li (2024) [21] Park & Sung (2023) [22] |
Human-like sensory | The effectiveness of VIs is influenced by the visual and auditory sensory nature of the product being endorsed. | Zou et al. (2024) [26] | |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Gesture | Curated imperfection | VI’s curated imperfection reduces perception of eeriness. | Franke et al. (2022) [25] |
Movement (gesture) | Perceived human-like qualities of HVIs influence consumers’ perceptions of social presence. | Zourrig et al. (2024) [27] Kim et al. (2023) [28] | |
Behavioral realism (lifelike behavior) | High behavioral realism (lifelike behavior) intensifies consumers’ emotional responses. | Kim et al. (2024) [2] | |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Character | Entertainment Expertise Trustworthiness | The entertainment value of influencer-generated content and VIs’ expertise and trustworthiness is positively related to parasocial relationships. | Lou and Kim (2019) [23] Lou et al. (2022) [24] |
Uniqueness Responsibility | VIs’ effectiveness as brand endorsers depends on perceptions of the VIs’ uniqueness and responsibility. | Thomas and Fowler (2021) [51] | |
Social cues | Sense of uncanniness is attenuated with VIs’ social cues. | Gutuleac et al. (2023) [64] | |
Interactivity | VIs’ interactivity mediated the positive effect of humanness over CSR message engagement. | Yang et al. (2023) [78] | |
Expertise Playfulness | Hedonic factors such as playfulness has a positive effect on trust in a VI and brand trust. | Kim et al. (2024) [70] | |
Constructed identity | VIs’ identities are constructed by blending human relatability with artificial novelty, blurring reality and fiction. | Block and Lovegrove (2021) [33] | |
Emotional intelligence | VIs’ emotional intelligence mediates the link between their emotional displays in posts and users’ attitudes toward them. | Ham et al. (2024) [52] | |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Awareness | Emotional disclosure (happiness, sadness, disgust, and surprise) | Emotional disclosure by VIs enhances their perceived credibility, user engagement, and parasocial relationships. | Li et al. (2024) [30] Jiang et al. (2024) [31] Yu et al. (2024) [32] |
Emotional appeals | Emotional appeals enhance user engagement, perceived credibility, and purchase decisions in VIs. | Lim and Lee (2023) [68] | |
Moral virtue Cognitive experience | Moral virtue and cognitive experience have a positive effect on both credibility and parasocial relationships. | Dabiran et al. (2024) [1] | |
Perceived similarity (human-like mental capacity) | Mental human-likeness mediated the effect of parasocial interaction with the VIs. | Stein et al. (2024) [19] |
Dimensions | Attributes | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Structure | Attractiveness Uniqueness Distinctive Contemporary Celebrity-like Mysterious True-to-life appearance | “It’s very attractive, trendy, and exotic.” “More visually attractive than humans.” “It may feel mysterious in advertising—good for a wide range of uses.” |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Gesture | Realism Liveliness Natural voice tone Human-like body movement Sync. of audio–video | “If their skin tones look artificial, like rubber—it can be unpleasant.” “These could threaten human models and jobs.” “Lip-sync error would create a jarring and unconvincing experience.” |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Character | Fun Authenticity Trustworthiness Empathy Cognitive openness Refinement and civility Rationality and logic | “Cognitive openness refers to a VI’s ability to adapt, think creatively, and embrace novel ideas.” “Refinement and civility contribute to a polished, sophisticated image. This is particularly critical for brands in luxury or high-end industries.” “When a VI demonstrates logical thinking and reasoning, it adds a sense of intellectual depth, especially in industries like finance, technology, or education.” |
Anthropomorphic Form of Human Awareness | Emotional responsiveness Interpersonal warmth Sympathy | “Emotional responsiveness is crucial for building relationships, increasing engagement.” “Warmth makes a VI feel genuine, fostering emotional connections and encouraging trust and loyalty among followers.” |
Others (related to VIs’ stories) | Contemporary Trendy persona Expandable stories Transcendent narratives Genuine and relatable Resonating with Gen Z | “Their story should align with contemporary culture.” “Young consumers like to feel ahead of the curve and part of niche movements.” “VIs ‘stories should straddle physical and digital realities.” |
Category | Freq. | Prop. (%) | Category | Freq. | Prop. (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 212 | 50.8 | Education | Under/graduated High School | 33 | 7.9 |
Female | 205 | 49.2 | Some college (associate degree) | 18 | 4.3 | ||
Age | <20 | 6 | 1.4 | Bachelor’s degree | 307 | 73.6 | |
20–29 | 67 | 16.1 | Post-graduate degree | 59 | 14.1 | ||
30–39 | 78 | 18.7 | |||||
40–49 | 99 | 23.7 | |||||
50–59 | 114 | 27.3 | |||||
>60 | 53 | 12.7 | Total | 417 | 100 |
Dimensions | Items “This Virtual Influencer (Is) or (‘s Content)”… | Factor Loading | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Communication Skills | 1. trustworthy | 0.76 | |||
2. authentic | 0.72 | ||||
3. empathetic | 0.70 | ||||
4. speaks like it understands my feelings | 0.68 | ||||
5. logical | 0.67 | ||||
6. speaks with its own will | 0.64 | ||||
7. friendly | 0.62 | ||||
8. speaks as if having direct conversation with me | 0.62 | ||||
9. speaks in emotional way | 0.57 | ||||
10. speaks in a warm tone | 0.57 | ||||
Narrative Strategies | 1. reflects the current cultural trends | 0.75 | |||
2. reveals how VI’s identity aligns with what is trending | 0.74 | ||||
3. features scalable narratives | 0.61 | ||||
4. transcends the boundaries of reality | 0.61 | ||||
5. mirrors the interests of the current generation | 0.60 | ||||
6. aligns with consumer preferences | 0.59 | ||||
Visual Appearance | 1. mysterious | 0.66 | |||
2. like a celebrity | 0.64 | ||||
3. attractive | 0.63 | ||||
4. distinctive | 0.52 | ||||
5. contemporary | 0.51 | ||||
Human-like movement | 1. voice and tone sound natural | 0.66 | |||
2. facial expressions are natural | 0.64 | ||||
3. body movements are natural | 0.61 | ||||
4. has a sense of realism | 0.54 | ||||
5. lips that sync accurately with the audio | 0.54 | ||||
Eigenvalue | 9.42 | 8.89 | 7.88 | 5.55 | |
Explained variance (%) | 18.48 | 17.43 | 15.44 | 10.88 | |
Explained cum. variance (%) | 18.48 | 35.91 | 51.35 | 62.23 |
Dimensions | Items | Factor Loading | CR | AVE | α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Communication Skills (CSs) | 1. trustworthy | 0.82 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.94 |
2. authentic | 0.80 | ||||
3. empathetic | 0.77 | ||||
4. speaks like it understands my feelings | 0.82 | ||||
5. logical | 0.74 | ||||
6. speaks with its own will | 0.76 | ||||
7. friendly | 0.82 | ||||
8. speaks as if having direct conversation with me | 0.80 | ||||
9. speaks in emotional way | 0.73 | ||||
10. speaks in a warm tone | 0.75 | ||||
Narrative Strategies (NSs) | 1. reflects the current cultural trends | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.58 | 0.90 |
2. reveals how VI’s identity aligns with what is trending | 0.76 | ||||
3. features scalable narratives | 0.80 | ||||
4. transcends the boundaries of reality | 0.70 | ||||
5. mirrors the interests of the current generation | 0.76 | ||||
6. aligns with consumer preferences | 0.79 | ||||
Visual Appearance (VA) | 1. mysterious | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 0.84 |
2. like a celebrity | 0.75 | ||||
3. attractive | 0.78 | ||||
4. distinctive | 0.70 | ||||
5. contemporary | 0.65 | ||||
Human-Like Movement (HLM) | 1. voice and tone sound natural | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.61 | 0.88 |
2. facial expressions are natural | 0.81 | ||||
3. body movements are natural | 0.79 | ||||
4. has a sense of realism | 0.78 | ||||
5. has accurate lip-sync | 0.76 |
CS | NS | A | HLM | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Communication Skills (CSs) | (0.61) | |||
Narrative Strategies (NSs) | 0.56 | (0.58) | ||
Visual Appearance (VA) | 0.60 | 0.55 | (0.53) | |
Human-Like Movement (HLM) | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.51 | (0.61) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cho, Y.Y. Virtual Influencers as Brand Endorsers: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Evaluation Scale. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020090
Cho YY. Virtual Influencers as Brand Endorsers: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Evaluation Scale. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2025; 20(2):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020090
Chicago/Turabian StyleCho, Yoon Y. 2025. "Virtual Influencers as Brand Endorsers: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Evaluation Scale" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20, no. 2: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020090
APA StyleCho, Y. Y. (2025). Virtual Influencers as Brand Endorsers: Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Evaluation Scale. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020090