Interactive Viral Marketing Through Big Data Analytics, Influencer Networks, AI Integration, and Ethical Dimensions

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital platforms has fundamentally reshaped network and viral marketing, profoundly transforming how information spreads across social networks and influences consumer behavior. This comprehensive review synthesizes theoretical, computational, and ethical perspectives into an integrated narrative, providing novel insights into the mechanisms driving information diffusion within contemporary interactive marketing. By integrating foundational concepts from social network theory, advanced graph models, and behavioral dynamics, the paper demonstrates how the interplay between network structures, influencer behaviors, and AI-driven algorithms significantly redefines traditional marketing paradigms. A distinctive theoretical contribution of this study lies in its innovative combination of Big Data analytics with AI-based predictive modeling, explicitly revealing how real-time algorithmic personalization not only enhances marketing effectiveness but also creates new ethical tensions surrounding misinformation, algorithmic bias, and consumer vulnerability. Addressing recent calls for greater theoretical originality and narrative coherence in interactive marketing research, this review explicitly highlights how these insights resolve critical theoretical puzzles and clarify contemporary ethical dilemmas. Additionally, the paper identifies emerging trends—including Web3 marketing, decentralized platforms, and neuroscience-driven targeting—offering clear future research directions. Through its integrative, narrative-driven framework, this study significantly advances interactive marketing theory, providing essential guidance for scholars and practitioners navigating the evolving complexities of digital influence.

1. Introduction

The rapid digitalization of communication and commerce has transformed the way individuals, brands, and organizations interact within online ecosystems. This transformation has given rise to significant theoretical questions about how digital interactions redefine traditional marketing theories, especially regarding influencer dynamics, algorithmic personalization, and viral information spread. Addressing these contemporary theoretical challenges, this paper offers unique insights into how interactive marketing practices evolve through the interplay of Big Data analytics, influencer networks, and AI-driven methodologies, thus directly responding to recent editorial calls for novel theoretical contributions beyond established frameworks [1].

At the core of this transformation lies network marketing and viral marketing, two interconnected phenomena that leverage the dynamics of social networks to amplify information dissemination, consumer engagement, and brand influence. As digital platforms evolve, understanding the mechanisms of virality, the role of influencers, and the impact of algorithmic curation has become essential for businesses, policymakers, and researchers alike. The ability to engineer and predict viral success is no longer merely a marketing advantage but a fundamental requirement for navigating the increasingly crowded and algorithm-driven digital landscape [2].

1.1. Defining Network Marketing and Viral Marketing

Network marketing refers to a strategic marketing approach that leverages the structure and dynamics of social networks to distribute products, services, or information. Unlike traditional advertising, which relies on one-to-many communication models, network marketing operates through peer-to-peer influence, multi-level marketing structures, and organic content sharing, enabling brands to capitalize on trust-based consumer relationships. This decentralized approach allows companies to expand their reach without relying solely on centralized advertising budgets, making it particularly effective in the age of social media and influencer-driven commerce [3].

Network marketing and viral marketing—a kind of marketing aimed at rapidly spreading knowledge by means of quick and spontaneous user involvement—have a close relationship. The pillar of viral marketing is social contagion, which holds that personal identity or the gain of social capital—in the form of pleasure, novelty, or perceived exclusivity—drives individuals more inclined to disseminate material that elicits strong emotional reactions. Whereas paid exposure forms the basis of conventional marketing campaigns, viral marketing employs people as distribution agents. This is not like conventional marketing initiatives. Inside digital ecosystems, this allows knowledge to flow quickly. Algorithmic recommendation systems might help to increase the success of viral marketing [4]. These systems rank material according on engagement metrics like sentiment analysis, number of shares, comments, and viewing time. The recent literature highlights how social media marketing, AI-driven personalization, and influencer dynamics are becoming deeply intertwined, forming a new landscape of interactive marketing research [5].

1.2. The Importance of Information Spread in Social Networks Today

The propagation of information in social networks is one of the most important processes that determine the shape of public opinion, consumer behavior, and economic trends. This is because, today, social media, AI in content curation, and decentralized digital communities have made information flow faster than it used to, sometimes even faster than conventional news cycles, regulatory bodies, and fact-checkers. The fact that one post, video, or tweet can reach millions of users in a few hours shows the great potential of network marketing strategies. This rapid dissemination is, therefore, positive in some ways and negative in other ways, and thus it is important to establish the mechanisms, trends, and ethical issues of viral information diffusion [6].

On the positive side, virality enables brands, activists, and educators to reach wide audiences efficiently, creating opportunities for grassroots mobilization, brand awareness, and consumer engagement. Viral content has driven social movements, fundraising campaigns, and successful product launches, demonstrating its potential for scalable, cost-effective impact. However, the same mechanisms that enable viral marketing to succeed also contribute to the rapid spread of misinformation, fake news, and manipulative advertising [7]. As social media platforms prioritize engagement-driven ranking models, emotionally charged or controversial content often outperforms fact-based, neutral messaging, creating an ecosystem where outrage, sensationalism, and manipulation can dominate discourse. Understanding how information spreads, what factors drive virality, and how algorithms shape content distribution is therefore essential for developing ethical, effective, and sustainable digital marketing practices [8].

Objective and Structure of the Review

Given the growing impact of network-driven content dissemination, the objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms, trends, and challenges associated with network and viral marketing. Specifically, this paper aims to:

• Examine the foundational theories and models that explain how information spreads within social networks, including social network theory, graph-based models, and diffusion frameworks.
• Analyze the role of influencers, social media algorithms, and engagement-based ranking systems in shaping digital virality and marketing effectiveness.
• Explore recent advancements in AI, behavioral targeting, and Web3 marketing, assessing their implications for the future of network-based influence and decentralized content distribution.
• Investigate ethical concerns related to misinformation, manipulative advertising, and algorithmic bias, providing insights into how brands and regulators can navigate these challenges responsibly [9].

These objectives are not merely descriptive; they address significant theoretical and practical puzzles, which are vital for both scholars and practitioners. Understanding these mechanisms helps marketers strategically leverage influencer authenticity, anticipate ethical challenges associated with AI-driven content personalization and manage the risks of misinformation. Consequently, this research is directly relevant to businesses seeking sustainable competitive advantages in digital markets and policymakers tasked with ensuring consumer protection and transparency [1].

To achieve these objectives, this paper is structured to provide a comprehensive exploration of network and viral marketing, beginning with Theoretical Foundations in Section 2, which delves into core principles such as social network theory, graph models, and information diffusion dynamics. This section establishes a foundational understanding of how ideas, products, and marketing messages propagate within digital ecosystems, setting the stage for subsequent discussions. Section 3, Marketing Theories in Digital Networks, examines the evolution of word-of-mouth marketing (WoM) and electronic word-of-mouth (eWoM), influencer marketing, and mass advertising, highlighting the shifting landscape of consumer trust, engagement dynamics, and the growing influence of algorithmic content visibility. Expanding on these insights, Section 4, Information Diffusion Models in Social Networks, provides an in-depth analysis of both classic and modern computational models, including epidemiological frameworks such as SIR, SIS, and SEIR, as well as threshold models (LT, IC) and AI-driven predictive diffusion systems, offering a mathematical and data-driven perspective on how content reaches critical mass in networked environments. Section 5, Social Media Algorithms and Their Impact on Information Spread, shifts focus toward platform-specific mechanisms, exploring how the recommendation algorithms employed by Facebook, Twitter/X, TikTok, and Instagram influence content virality. This section also examines critical concerns such as echo chambers, filter bubbles, and algorithmic bias, analyzing their role in shaping public discourse, consumer behavior, and the selective amplification of certain narratives over others. Section 6, Misinformation, Fake News and Ethical Considerations, critically investigates the proliferation of misinformation in viral marketing, particularly the rise of deepfake-driven deception, false endorsements, and manipulative advertising tactics, while also proposing potential solutions for fact-checking, misinformation detection, and the ethical regulation of AI-powered marketing practices. Looking ahead, Section 7, Emerging Trends in Network and Viral Marketing, explores the future trajectory of digital influence, focusing on short-form video virality (TikTok, Reels, YouTube Shorts), decentralized social networks (Web3 marketing), AI-driven chatbots, and the integration of neuroscience-based behavioral targeting techniques, which are increasingly shaping how brands engineer engagement and predict consumer responses. Section 8, Conclusions, synthesizes the key findings of the review and discusses potential future developments in network marketing. Finally, Section 9, Limitations and Future Directions, identifies critical research gaps that warrant further exploration, offering insights into how network and viral marketing will continue to evolve in an era of hyper-connected digital ecosystems, AI-driven personalization, and decentralized content distribution models.

Original Contribution and Added Value

This review offers an original contribution by systematically integrating theoretical, behavioral, and computational perspectives into a cross-disciplinary framework for understanding viral marketing in digital networks. By bringing together social network theory, Big Data-driven graph models, principles of homophily and social contagion, classical information diffusion models, and modern AI-based prediction techniques, this review provides a structured synthesis that connects traditionally separate research streams. This study also critically analyzes the interplay between network structures, algorithmic amplification, and behavioral dynamics, highlighting how they jointly influence the spread of information in contemporary digital ecosystems. In doing so, it identifies emerging research gaps, particularly in the areas of ethical algorithmic design, influencer-driven misinformation, and decentralized social network diffusion. This integrative, cross-disciplinary perspective is intended to advance current academic discourse and support future research in digital marketing, social network analysis, and information diffusion modeling.

The originality of this research lies in its novel integration of computational, behavioral, and ethical dimensions within interactive marketing theory. Rather than confirming well-established theoretical assumptions, this study uniquely addresses contemporary theoretical gaps by showing precisely how AI analytics and influencer strategies dynamically reshape traditional understandings of networked information spread. By explicitly identifying critical ethical tensions and offering clear theoretical resolutions, this paper fulfills recent editorial expectations for genuinely innovative and narrative-driven theoretical advancements [1].

2. Theoretical Foundations

The theoretical framework of this paper provides an integrated narrative that bridges classical theories with contemporary digital phenomena; for example, it investigates social network theory and graph models to demonstrate Big Data techniques for mapping and predicting viral marketing. Unlike traditional conceptualizations of viral marketing, which have often considered only superficial interactions or basic network dynamics, this paper uniquely explores how AI-driven analytics, influencer networks, and social contagion mechanisms intertwine to create dynamic, predictive, and ethically complex engagement patterns. By emphasizing a nuanced interplay among sophisticated computational models, real-time personalization, and influencer behavior, this conceptual approach moves beyond common marketing wisdom, addressing the recent editorial calls for genuinely insightful theoretical advancements [1,10,11].

2.1. Social Network Theory and Graph Models—The Role of Big Data in Understanding Viral Marketing

The study of social networks is deeply rooted in graph theory, a mathematical framework that models relationships as a set of nodes (vertices) connected by edges (links) to represent how individuals, organizations, or entities interact within a networked environment. In the context of network and viral marketing, understanding the topology of these networks is crucial, as it determines the efficiency, scale, and trajectory at which information, trends, and products spread. Social network theory, in combination with Big Data analytics, provides an essential foundation for analyzing influence flows, identifying key influencers, and designing marketing strategies that optimize outreach and engagement [12]. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning-driven data analysis, modern graph models now leverage Big Data techniques to process vast amounts of interactional, behavioral, and transactional data, allowing for real-time detection of viral trends, predictive modeling of information diffusion, and enhanced precision in campaign targeting [13].

Graph models enable marketers to quantify and visualize relationships between users, offering insights into information diffusion patterns, community clustering, and network resilience [14]. A social network is typically represented as G = (V, E), where V is the set of nodes (users) and E is the set of edges (connections). Depending on the nature of the connections, these graphs can be directed (where relationships have a specific direction, such as Twitter follows) or undirected (where relationships are bidirectional, such as Facebook friendships) [15]. As marketing strategies increasingly rely on Big Data, network analysis has become more sophisticated, utilizing machine learning algorithms to process millions of interactions per second, identifying not only direct relationships but also hidden patterns of influence across multiple platforms. These capabilities have enabled brands to track engagement trends dynamically, detect emerging influencers, and predict which content is most likely to achieve viral status based on real-time network behaviors [16].

This nuanced understanding of nodes, edges, and influencer roles contributes novel insights by explicitly integrating Big Data analytics and AI-driven sentiment tracking to dynamically model influencer effectiveness. This moves beyond static influencer categorizations, addressing recent editorial critiques that advocate for meaningful theoretical contributions derived from current digital practice rather than merely confirming established relationships [10].

2.1.1. Nodes, Edges, and Their Roles in Network Structures

At the most basic level, nodes in a social network represent individual actors—such as people, organizations, or even AI-driven digital entities like automated marketing accounts and chatbots. Edges, on the other hand, represent relationships or interactions between these nodes, such as friendships, follows, likes, shares, or message exchanges. With Big Data integration, these relationships can now be analyzed at an unprecedented scale, revealing complex, multi-layered interactions that go beyond traditional network models. The nature of these connections plays a crucial role in determining how effectively marketing messages propagate, with strong-tie relationships facilitating trust-based influence and weak-tie relationships enabling broader dissemination across diverse communities [17].

The significance of edges in viral marketing effectiveness can be categorized as follows:

• Edge Weight: Some connections exert greater influence than others. Close friendships (high-weight edges) tend to yield stronger persuasion effects, whereas weaker ties (low-weight edges) facilitate cross-community dissemination.
• Edge Directionality: Platforms like Twitter, where relationships are asymmetric, create a hierarchical information flow, where high-profile users (celebrities, industry leaders) act as central broadcasters.
• Edge Multiplicity: A single relationship can manifest in multiple interactions, such as a user being a friend, professional contact, and co-engager on shared content, increasing the likelihood of repeat exposure to marketing messages [18].

Leveraging Big Data analytics, marketers can now predict which edges in a network are most likely to amplify a campaign, optimizing message targeting through machine learning models that assess engagement probabilities in real time. Social platforms utilize AI-driven ranking systems to analyze these edge properties, ensuring that content appears on feeds where it is most likely to trigger interaction, thereby enhancing virality [19].

2.1.2. Communities and Clustering in Social Networks

A defining feature of social networks is the formation of communities, which are densely connected clusters of users who share common interests, behaviors, or affiliations. In viral marketing, communities play a pivotal role in content dissemination, as information often spreads within these tight-knit groups before diffusing across network boundaries via bridge nodes (users connected to multiple communities) [20]. The application of Big Data analytics in community detection has enabled brands to segment audiences with greater accuracy, identifying which clusters are most receptive to specific messaging and optimizing campaign deployment accordingly. Community detection algorithms such as Modularity-based clustering, the Louvain Method, and spectral clustering leverage Big Data to analyze large-scale networks, uncovering hidden substructures that influence viral potential. From a marketing perspective, this enables hyper-targeted advertising, allowing brands to strategically seed information within high-engagement communities to maximize organic spread. Additionally, the clustering coefficient, which measures the degree of interconnectivity within a user’s immediate network, is a critical metric in determining whether a campaign will achieve localized virality or break into mainstream attention. Platforms like Facebook, which prioritize real-world connections, exhibit high clustering coefficients, whereas Twitter and Reddit, which foster cross-community interactions, tend to have lower clustering coefficients, making them more suitable for broad-scale viral marketing campaigns [21].

Modularity-Based Clustering

Modularity-based clustering measures how efficiently a given partition of nodes promotes internal connections within communities while minimizing external connections between them. This property allows researchers to identify cohesive community structures inside a network [22]. The fundamental concept of modularity is that denser intra-community edges should be present in a well-defined community than in inter-community edges. A modularity score computes the difference between a random baseline model and the real edge distribution in a network split, therefore quantifying this. A greater modularity score (Q) indicates a stronger community structure, which directs the method in improving clusters for optimal segmentation. Modularity-based clustering enables companies in the framework of viral marketing to find highly coherent audience groupings where strong internal connectedness is likely to cause information to circulate more effectively. A company may, for instance, employ modularity clustering on social media engagement networks to identify which groups of consumers routinely connect with each other, therefore enabling them to deliberately seed viral content inside closely knit subgroups before wide audience expansion. This method is particularly effective in detecting interest-based communities, such as fans of a specific product category or followers of a niche influencer, helping brands target advertisements and promotional campaigns with maximum relevance [23]. The basic equation for Modularity-based clustering is defined as:

$$Q={\displaystyle \frac{1}{2m}}\sum _{i,j}\left[A_{i,j}-{\displaystyle \frac{k_i{k}_j}{2m}}\right]\delta \left(c_{i,}{c}_j\right)$$

This can be broken down as follows:

➢

Q = modularity score (higher values indicate stronger community structure)

➢

A_i,j = adjacency matrix element (1 if nodes i and j are connected, else 0)

➢

k_i, k_j = degrees of nodes i and j

➢

m = total number of edges in the network

➢

δ(c_i,c_j) = 1 if nodes i and j belong to the same community, else 0

Below, Figure 1 shows the graphical representation of the Modularity-based clustering algorithm.

Louvain Method

The Louvain Method is an advanced, hierarchical approach to community detection that builds upon modularity optimization to efficiently cluster large-scale networks. Unlike standard modularity-based methods, which can be computationally expensive, the Louvain algorithm operates in two iterative phases: first, it assigns each node to its own community, then iteratively merges nodes into larger clusters that maximize modularity [24]. This hierarchical process continues until no further improvements can be made, allowing the method to identify both small and large-scale communities dynamically. The Louvain Method is particularly powerful in viral marketing analytics because it enables brands to segment vast online user bases into meaningful, engagement-driven clusters without requiring prior knowledge of community structure [25]. For instance, when analyzing Twitter or Instagram follower networks, the Louvain algorithm can group users based on interaction patterns, shared interests, or retweet behaviors, helping brands understand which user segments are naturally more receptive to specific messaging. This insight allows marketers to fine-tune influencer partnerships, optimize ad targeting, and predict which sub-communities are most likely to trigger viral spread. Due to its efficiency and scalability, the Louvain Method is commonly applied in large-scale Big Data marketing strategies, enabling real-time segmentation of millions of users on social media platforms. The Louvain Method iteratively optimizes modularity by merging small communities into larger ones, using the Modularity-based clustering equation in a hierarchical fashion. Figure 2 below illustrates how the Louvain algorithm works.

Spectral Clustering

Spectral clustering is a powerful technique that leverages the mathematical properties of graph theory to uncover hidden community structures in social networks. Unlike modularity-based methods, which focus on direct edge density, spectral clustering relies on the graph Laplacian matrix, which captures the global structure of a network through eigenvector decomposition [26]. This technique transforms network data into a lower-dimensional space where community structures become more apparent, allowing for highly accurate segmentation of complex, non-obvious groups. In the context of viral marketing, spectral clustering is especially useful for detecting weakly connected but behaviorally similar users—for example, users who do not engage with the same content directly but exhibit similar interaction patterns over time. This makes it highly effective for recommendation systems, where brands seek to identify latent audience clusters who may not yet be directly connected but are likely to respond similarly to targeted content. Spectral clustering is also used in predictive marketing analytics, where machine learning models analyze historical user behavior to anticipate which groups are most likely to generate viral engagement in future campaigns. Given its ability to reveal hidden structures within networks, spectral clustering plays a critical role in AI-driven audience segmentation, personalized content distribution, and advanced consumer behavior modeling in the era of Big Data marketing [27].

Spectral clustering is based on the graph Laplacian matrix, defined as:

$$L=D-A$$

where:

• L = Laplacian matrix
• D = diagonal degree matrix (each diagonal element is the degree of a node)
• A = adjacency matrix

The algorithm computes the eigenvectors of L, clustering nodes based on their spectral embeddings. Figure 3 shows a graphical representation of the spectral clustering technique.

These three algorithms—Modularity-based clustering, the Louvain Method, and spectral clustering—each provide unique advantages for identifying and analyzing social media communities, making them invaluable tools in viral marketing strategies. Modularity-based clustering offers a structured approach to segmenting highly interconnected groups, the Louvain Method provides scalability and efficiency for large datasets, and spectral clustering excels at identifying non-obvious but behaviorally similar communities. Incorporating these methods into Big Data-driven viral marketing campaigns enables brands to optimize message diffusion, enhance ad targeting, and maximize the likelihood of sustained consumer engagement across diverse audience segments [28].

2.1.3. The Role of Influencers in Network-Based Marketing

Influencers serve as high-impact nodes within social networks, acting as amplifiers that drive content visibility and engagement. In network analysis, influencers can be identified through graph-theoretic metrics, such as:

• Degree Centrality: The most basic measure, counting the number of direct connections a node has. High-degree nodes (e.g., celebrities, major brands) can broadcast messages widely.
• Betweenness Centrality: Measures how often a node acts as a bridge between other nodes. Users with high betweenness centrality (e.g., industry thought leaders) are critical for cross-community diffusion of content.
• Eigenvector Centrality: Extends degree centrality by weighting connections based on their importance—high eigenvector centrality suggests influence over other influential users (used in Google’s PageRank algorithm).
• Closeness Centrality: Measures how quickly a node can reach others in the network, useful for early adopters in viral campaigns [29].

However, with the advent of Big Data and AI-driven engagement analysis, modern influencer identification has become far more dynamic, incorporating behavioral data, sentiment analysis, and predictive modeling to assess an influencer’s real-time impact. Platforms now use Big Data-driven influencer ranking algorithms to evaluate not just reach (followers) but also engagement quality, authenticity, and audience sentiment, ensuring that brands collaborate with high-impact influencers who drive meaningful interactions rather than superficial visibility [30]. Marketing campaigns often focus on two key types of influencers:

• Macro-Influencers: Celebrities or widely followed figures who can generate mass exposure but may lack deep personal engagement.
• Micro-Influencers: Niche experts or community leaders with smaller followings but higher trust and engagement rates.

Interestingly, recent studies (e.g., [31]) suggest that micro-influencers are more effective for long-term engagement because they generate authentic conversations and trust within tightly knit communities. This is why many brands now prefer a micro-influencer strategy over traditional celebrity endorsements.

2.1.4. Concepts Like Homophily, Social Contagion, and Diffusion of Innovation

The process through which information, behaviors, and innovations spread within a social network is governed by fundamental principles that determine who interacts with whom, how influence is exerted, and why certain ideas or products gain widespread acceptance while others fade into obscurity [32]. Among these principles, three interconnected concepts—homophily, social contagion, and diffusion of innovation—are central to understanding how information spreads, how consumer behavior is influenced, and why some ideas achieve mass adoption while others fade. Big Data has revolutionized the study of these mechanisms by enabling real-time tracking of viral trends, sentiment shifts, and community adoption curves, making diffusion models more precise and adaptable [33].

Homophily and the Formation of Social Structures

Homophily, the principle that individuals tend to form connections with others who share similar interests, values, and demographic attributes, plays a critical role in shaping the architecture of social networks and the effectiveness of digital marketing strategies. In the digital landscape, this phenomenon is amplified by AI-driven recommendation systems, which leverage Big Data analytics to analyze user interactions, preferences, and engagement history [34]. Platforms like Facebook, TikTok, Twitter/X, and Instagram utilize homophily-based clustering algorithms to segment audiences into highly specialized content ecosystems, ensuring that users encounter posts, advertisements, and recommendations that align with their previous behavior. This results in a self-reinforcing feedback loop, where users engage primarily with like-minded communities, deepening their affinity for certain brands, ideologies, and influencers while minimizing exposure to alternative perspectives or competing products [35]. For marketers, this presents a double-edged sword: while homophily enhances targeting precision and engagement efficiency, it also limits the ability of brands to break into new consumer segments, as content struggles to penetrate networks beyond a user’s predefined interests. Big Data-driven audience segmentation allows brands to optimize messaging for specific demographic clusters, ensuring that campaigns resonate deeply within established user bases, but at the cost of potentially missing out on cross-community influence and organic expansion into untapped markets [36].

Homophily also plays an important role in peer-to-peer influence dynamics, a cornerstone of word-of-mouth and viral marketing strategies. Users are far more likely to trust recommendations, reviews, and endorsements from individuals who share their social, cultural, or professional background, making homophilous communities ideal breeding grounds for brand advocacy and consumer-driven marketing campaigns. AI-enhanced consumer profiling, fueled by vast datasets of user behavior, sentiment analysis, and purchasing history, enables platforms to identify micro-communities where homophily-driven influence is most potent, allowing brands to seed viral content within tightly connected groups for maximum impact [37]. This is especially evident in micro-influencer marketing, where niche content creators with highly homophilous audiences generate significantly higher engagement and conversion rates than broad-reaching celebrity endorsements. However, the reliance on homophily also raises concerns about digital echo chambers, where users are insulated from diverse perspectives, reinforcing confirmation bias and limiting exposure to alternative products, services, or ideologies. The challenge for marketers, therefore, is to balance personalized targeting with strategic content diversification, ensuring that campaigns capitalize on homophilous trust dynamics while still maintaining pathways for broader network diffusion and cross-community engagement [38].

Social Contagion and the Mechanisms of Information Spread

Social contagion, the process through which ideas, behaviors, and emotions spread within a network, is a fundamental driver of viral marketing, consumer behavior, and digital influence. In the context of network-based marketing, social contagion can manifest in two primary forms: simple contagion, where a single exposure to a message is enough to prompt adoption or engagement, and complex contagion, where multiple reinforcements from different sources are required before an individual is persuaded to take action [38]. The ability to distinguish between these two contagion mechanisms is essential for marketers seeking to optimize brand messaging, influencer outreach, and content dissemination strategies. With the rise of Big Data analytics and machine learning, brands can now analyze massive datasets of user interactions in real time, tracking how specific pieces of content gain traction, circulate across social networks, and ultimately influence consumer behavior. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok rely on AI-powered engagement models to determine whether a campaign should prioritize high-visibility, single-exposure strategies (for simple contagion) or sustained, multi-source reinforcement (for complex contagion) [39]. For example, an emotionally charged advertisement, meme, or viral video might spread rapidly through simple contagion, requiring only one exposure to prompt sharing or engagement, while a new product adoption campaign or social movement initiative might depend on complex contagion, necessitating multiple trusted endorsements before reaching mainstream acceptance. By leveraging predictive modeling and sentiment analysis, brands can refine their strategies to maximize virality, ensuring that marketing messages are structured in a way that aligns with the underlying psychological and network-based mechanisms of information diffusion [40].

Furthermore, social contagion plays a crucial role in shaping purchasing decisions, brand loyalty, and influencer marketing effectiveness. Studies in behavioral economics and neuroscience have shown that individuals are significantly more likely to adopt behaviors when they observe multiple peers doing the same, a phenomenon that Big Data analytics can now quantify at an unprecedented scale [41,42]. Platforms track interaction patterns, sentiment shifts, and engagement cascades, allowing brands to identify the tipping points at which an idea transitions from niche adoption to viral success. This is particularly evident in multi-influencer marketing strategies, where brands collaborate with a network of micro-influencers and community leaders to ensure that their messaging reaches consumers through diverse yet interconnected channels, reinforcing trust and increasing the likelihood of adoption [43]. Unlike traditional advertising, which relies on broad reach and repeated exposure through mass media, social contagion-driven marketing leverages peer influence and social proof, making it more organic, psychologically persuasive, and cost-effective. However, brands must also be cautious of negative social contagion, where negative reviews, controversy, or backlash can spread just as rapidly as positive endorsements, requiring real-time brand monitoring and crisis management strategies. The integration of Big Data and AI-powered analytics into contagion modeling allows companies to anticipate shifts in consumer sentiment, adjust messaging strategies dynamically, and strategically amplify engagement within high-impact networks, ensuring that their campaigns achieve maximum resonance and longevity in the digital marketplace [44].

Diffusion of Innovation and Market Adoption Dynamics

The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory, first introduced by Everett Rogers (1962), provides a structured framework for understanding how new ideas, technologies, and products gain traction within social networks, progressing from early adopters to widespread mainstream acceptance [45]. This theory classifies consumers into five adoption categories—innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards—each exhibiting distinct behaviors and motivations when engaging with novel offerings. In the past, tracking the diffusion of innovation relied on market surveys, observational studies, and retrospective analyses. However, with the rise of Big Data and machine learning, brands now have access to real-time adoption metrics, enabling them to predict product adoption curves, identify early trendsetters, and strategically intervene at critical phases of the diffusion process. Machine learning models, trained on historical consumer trends, social media interactions, purchasing behaviors, and sentiment analysis, can forecast adoption rates with increasing precision, allowing marketers to dynamically adjust their advertising, pricing, and promotional strategies to accelerate uptake. By analyzing past adoption patterns, engagement signals, and influencer impact, AI-driven diffusion models help brands anticipate potential adoption barriers, refine messaging for different consumer segments, and optimize the timing of product rollouts to maximize conversion potential. This ability to predict and shape consumer adoption in real time has transformed the way companies introduce, promote, and scale new products, making data-driven marketing an essential component of innovation diffusion [46].

Moreover, Big Data has also enhanced our understanding of how social influence, peer recommendations, and network structures shape DOI dynamics. Traditional DOI theory assumes that consumers progress through adoption stages based on personal preferences and perceived utility, but in today’s hyper-connected digital landscape, consumer adoption is increasingly dictated by social proof, influencer endorsements, and AI-powered content personalization. Platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram utilize Big Data analytics to detect emerging product trends, identify influential early adopters, and amplify content that demonstrates high engagement potential. Brands strategically collaborate with key opinion leaders (KOLs), micro-influencers, and niche communities to seed adoption among early adopters, ensuring that their products gain credibility and visibility before reaching the broader early majority. The rise of predictive diffusion modeling also allows companies to test multiple marketing strategies simultaneously, using A/B testing and reinforcement learning algorithms to determine which messaging resonates best with different adoption groups. However, one of the greatest challenges in diffusion theory is crossing the adoption chasm—the gap between early adopters and the early majority, where many products fail to transition from niche interest to mass-market acceptance [47]. Big Data-powered sentiment analysis and engagement tracking help brands identify hesitation points, refine their messaging to appeal to hesitant adopters, and implement retargeting campaigns to re-engage users who showed initial interest but did not convert. As marketing strategies continue to evolve, the integration of Big Data with DOI theory will play a pivotal role in accelerating innovation adoption, reducing market entry risks, and ensuring that new ideas achieve viral momentum within the digital ecosystem [48].

The integration of AI-driven analytics into traditional social contagion models presents a distinctive theoretical advancement. It captures previously unrecognized subtleties in consumer behavior prediction, such as real-time emotional contagion and dynamically evolving network structures, which are vital in understanding and leveraging contemporary digital engagement practices. This directly addresses the call by Wang [1,11] for interactive marketing research to provide innovative theoretical insights rather than merely validating established frameworks.

2.2. Marketing Theories in Digital Networks

2.2.1. Word-of-Mouth (WoM) vs. Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWoM)

Word-of-mouth (WoM) has long been recognized as one of the most powerful drivers of consumer behavior, influencing purchasing decisions through interpersonal communication and social trust. Traditionally, WoM marketing refers to the process by which individuals share opinions, experiences, and recommendations about products, services, or brands in face-to-face interactions [49]. This form of communication is deeply rooted in social capital theory, which suggests that people rely on trusted social connections to reduce uncertainty when making decisions. Because WoM is based on pre-existing relationships, it is often perceived as more credible and persuasive than traditional advertising, making it a valuable asset for companies seeking to build brand loyalty and organic reach. The impact of WoM can be observed in consumer behavior models such as the Theory of Planned Behavior, which posits that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence an individual’s intention to adopt or reject a product. When individuals hear about a product from trusted sources, they are more likely to develop positive attitudes and perceive a lower risk of adoption, leading to higher conversion rates [50].

However, the advent of digital networks has transformed traditional WoM into electronic word-of-mouth (eWoM), fundamentally altering the scale, speed, and impact of interpersonal recommendations. Unlike traditional WoM, which is limited by geographical and social constraints, eWoM occurs on digital platforms such as social media, online forums, review websites, and messaging apps, allowing instantaneous global reach. While conventional WoM is typically dyadic or small-group-based, eWoM enables one-to-many or many-to-many communication, exponentially increasing the diffusion potential of consumer opinions. The impact of eWoM has been extensively studied in digital marketing and consumer behavior research, with scholars identifying key differences between its effectiveness and that of traditional WoM. Research by [50] demonstrated that online reviews significantly influence purchasing decisions, with positive reviews increasing product sales and negative reviews deterring potential buyers, even when the reviewer is unknown to the consumer. Unlike face-to-face recommendations, which rely on strong social ties, eWoM can exert influence even through weak ties or anonymous sources, as consumers often consider aggregate opinions (e.g., star ratings, likes, or comments) as a proxy for product quality [51].

One of the key mathematical models used to analyze WoM and eWoM dynamics is the Bass Diffusion Model, which describes how new products are adopted within a population based on two key forces: innovation (independent adoption) and imitation (socially influenced adoption). The model suggests that early adopters are driven by personal preferences and external factors, while the majority of consumers adopt based on social influence and interpersonal communication. In the context of digital marketing, eWoM accelerates the imitation factor, as consumers are continuously exposed to peer-generated content, influencer endorsements, and algorithm-driven recommendations. Platforms like Amazon, Yelp, and TripAdvisor utilize sentiment analysis and reputation scores to quantify the impact of eWoM, providing empirical evidence that user-generated content (UGC) has a statistically significant effect on consumer behavior [52].

Another distinction between WoM and eWoM is the content persistence and amplification. Traditional word-of-mouth communication typically occurs in real-time and, while often initiated among immediate participants, can extend beyond them through subsequent interpersonal exchanges, leading to broader dissemination of information [53]; hence, it is ephemeral. On the other hand, eWoM is permanent, searchable, and algorithmically amplified, which means that one consumer review, tweet, or influencer endorsement can be available and impact potential buyers even after the first interaction. The power of algorithmic amplification in eWoM has been extensively studied in computational social science, and research shows that engagement metrics, including likes, shares, and retweets, are key to determining content visibility [54]. In those cases where traditional WoM is spread through direct interpersonal communication, eWoM is platform-mediated and algorithms selectively boost high-engagement content, further warping the organic reach of consumer opinions. This introduces a visibility bias, as very engaging but potentially misleading content may be given disproportionate exposure compared to more balanced, nuanced discussions [55].

Furthermore, the credibility and trust dynamics of WoM and eWoM have many differences. Face-to-face recommendations are often embedded in real-life social relationships, where trust is built through reputation, reciprocity, and accountability. In digital environments, however, anonymity and commercialization introduce new challenges. Fake reviews, influencer sponsorships, and bot-generated engagement have become prevalent issues, leading to concerns about the authenticity of online recommendations. Studies on review fraud detection have shown that as much as 20–30% of online reviews on major platforms may be manipulated, either through paid promotions or competitor-driven sabotage [54]. In contrast, traditional WoM is inherently self-regulating, as individuals are held accountable for their recommendations within their social circles [56].

Despite these challenges, eWoM remains an indispensable force in modern marketing, offering brands unprecedented reach, data-driven insights, and scalability. By leveraging natural language processing (NLP), machine learning algorithms, and sentiment analysis, companies can track and predict consumer sentiment in real time, allowing for proactive marketing interventions. While traditional WoM remains relevant in niche, trust-based settings, such as luxury markets and high-involvement purchases, eWoM dominates low-cost, high-volume consumer goods, where social proof and online visibility are critical determinants of success. The interplay between WoM and eWoM thus reflects a broader evolution in consumer influence mechanisms, where digital amplification, algorithmic bias, and data-driven personalization continue to reshape the landscape of networked marketing strategies.

Table 1. Overview of WoM vs. eWoM.

Aspect	Word-of-Mouth (WoM)	Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWoM)
Definition	Traditional face-to-face interpersonal communication where consumers share opinions and recommendations.	Digital form of word-of-mouth occurring on social media, review platforms, and online forums.
Reach and Scale	Limited to small social circles, usually dyadic or small-group-based.	Global and instantaneous, facilitating one-to-many and many-to-many communication.
Persistence	Ephemeral; conversations exist only in real-time interactions.	Permanent, searchable, and amplified by algorithms, remaining visible over time.
Trust and Credibility	Based on strong social ties and real-world relationships, fostering higher trust and accountability.	Can come from both strong and weak ties; anonymity and commercial influence introduce concerns about authenticity (e.g., fake reviews, bot engagement).
Speed of Diffusion	Slow and organic, dependent on in-person interactions.	Rapid, accelerated by digital platforms, influencers, and recommendation algorithms.
Algorithmic Influence	No external influence; purely social.	Platforms boost high-engagement content, sometimes distorting organic reach and visibility.
Impact on Consumer Behavior	Influences high-involvement and trust-based purchases (e.g., luxury goods, professional services).	More influential for low-cost, high-volume goods, where social proof and visibility drive purchases.
Measurement and Analytics	Difficult to track or quantify; relies on surveys and observational studies.	Easily measurable through sentiment analysis, engagement metrics, and NLP-based consumer sentiment tracking.
Key Models Explaining Influence	Theory of Planned Behavior explains how social norms and trust influence decision-making.	Bass Diffusion Model and engagement-based ranking models describe how eWoM accelerates adoption.
Potential Issues	Information may be biased due to social pressure, but self-regulated within trusted networks.	Prone to manipulation, including fake reviews, influencer sponsorships, and engagement farming.

summarizes the differences between traditional word-of-mouth (WoM) and electronic word-of-mouth (eWoM) [57].

2.2.2. Influencer Marketing vs. Mass Advertising

The evolution of digital networks has fundamentally transformed the landscape of marketing, shifting the paradigm from traditional mass advertising to influencer-driven promotional strategies. While mass advertising has historically dominated consumer outreach through one-to-many broadcast communication, influencer marketing leverages peer-to-peer engagement and social credibility to drive brand awareness and conversions. This shift is driven by profound changes in consumer behavior, media consumption patterns, and trust dynamics, with modern audiences exhibiting an increasing preference for authentic, personalized content over corporate-driven messaging. The distinction between these two approaches is not merely a difference in content delivery but rather a reflection of underlying shifts in social influence mechanisms, technological advancements in targeted advertising, and the growing role of algorithmic content curation in shaping consumer decisions [58].

Mass advertising, which emerged as the dominant marketing strategy in the 20th century, is characterized by broad, undifferentiated messaging aimed at large-scale audiences. Traditional channels such as television, radio, billboards, and print media have long been the primary vehicles for corporate communication, with companies investing heavily in high-reach, standardized campaigns to maximize brand exposure. The effectiveness of mass advertising is largely contingent upon the reach-frequency-impact model, wherein repeated exposure to a brand message increases consumer awareness and recall, ultimately influencing purchasing behavior. This model aligns with classical advertising theories such as AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) and Hierarchy of Effects Theory, both of which posit that consumers transition through predictable cognitive and emotional stages before making a purchase decision. However, the fundamental limitation of mass advertising lies in its lack of personalization and interactivity—messages are designed for broad demographics rather than individual preferences, resulting in lower engagement rates, especially among digitally native audiences [59].

In contrast, influencer marketing represents a highly targeted, socially embedded approach that capitalizes on the trust and credibility of individual content creators to influence consumer decisions. Unlike mass advertising, which relies on corporate brand authority, influencer marketing functions through parasocial relationships, where consumers develop perceived personal connections with influencers, leading to higher trust, engagement, and conversion rates. This phenomenon is supported by Social Identity Theory, which suggests that individuals are more likely to be influenced by those they perceive as belonging to their in-group. Because influencers curate content that aligns with the interests, values, and lifestyles of their followers, their recommendations often carry greater persuasive power than traditional advertisements, making them particularly effective in niche markets and community-driven product categories [60]. In addition to traditional comparisons between influencer marketing and mass advertising, recent research underlines the growing need for multi-platform influencer strategies and cross-channel engagement tactics to optimize digital campaigns [61].

From a structural perspective, influencer marketing can be categorized into macro-influencers, micro-influencers, and nano-influencers, each serving distinct roles within digital marketing ecosystems. Macro-influencers—celebrities and widely followed digital personalities—offer high visibility but lower engagement rates, as their content is consumed by diverse, large-scale audiences with varying levels of interest in specific products. Micro-influencers, typically individuals with 10,000 to 100,000 followers, are known for higher engagement rates due to their deeper community involvement and stronger trust relationships with their audience. Nano-influencers, with fewer than 10,000 followers, exhibit the highest engagement and credibility, as their content is perceived as authentic, uncommercialized, and directly relevant to niche communities. Empirical studies indicate that micro- and nano-influencers achieve 2–3× higher engagement rates than macro-influencers, highlighting the importance of relatability over sheer reach in digital marketing strategies [62]. In addition to human influencers, recent research has also highlighted the growing role of virtual influencers—AI-generated personas designed to interact with audiences on social media platforms. Studies show that these virtual influencers can enhance corporate reputation and credibility, sometimes outperforming their human counterparts in perceived trustworthiness and engagement among certain digital-native demographics [63]. Their ability to maintain consistent brand narratives, avoid human scandals, and offer highly controlled brand alignment makes them an increasingly attractive asset in influencer-driven marketing strategies.

One of the primary drivers behind the rise of influencer marketing is the increasing dominance of algorithm-driven content discovery on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Unlike traditional mass advertising, which relies on fixed media placements, influencer content is organically distributed based on engagement metrics, audience behavior, and AI-driven personalization algorithms. This results in a self-reinforcing feedback loop, where highly engaging influencer content is algorithmically promoted, leading to further amplification and reach expansion. Platforms such as TikTok have disrupted traditional advertising models by prioritizing user-generated content (UGC) over corporate advertising, making influencer-driven promotions more cost-effective and scalable than mass advertising campaigns. Furthermore, the integration of shoppable content, live-stream commerce, and AI-driven product recommendations has further blurred the lines between content consumption and purchasing decisions, accelerating the shift toward influencer-led marketing ecosystems [64].

Despite its growing dominance, influencer marketing presents several challenges and ethical concerns that differentiate it from mass advertising. Unlike regulated advertising campaigns, which adhere to strict disclosure guidelines and brand messaging consistency, influencer marketing operates in a more decentralized, often opaque environment where transparency and authenticity concerns frequently arise. Issues such as sponsored content disclosure, fake followers, engagement fraud, and conflicts of interest have raised questions about the long-term credibility of influencer-driven promotions. Regulatory bodies, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States and the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the United Kingdom, have implemented disclosure requirements mandating influencers to clearly indicate paid partnerships, yet enforcement remains inconsistent across different markets and platforms. Additionally, research suggests that while influencer marketing can drive short-term engagement and conversions, its long-term brand impact may be weaker than mass advertising, particularly for established legacy brands that rely on sustained brand equity rather than viral trends [65].

A key distinction between mass advertising and influencer marketing is the economics of trust—whereas mass advertising is built upon brand reputation and historical credibility, influencer marketing is contingent upon peer trust and social proof. Mass advertising functions effectively for brands with high market penetration and broad consumer appeal, where repeated exposure creates brand familiarity and recall. This explains why large corporations with established brand equity, such as Coca-Cola or Apple, continue to allocate significant budgets to television and digital display ads, despite the rise of influencer-driven promotions. Conversely, new and emerging brands often rely on influencer marketing as a cost-effective, high-impact strategy to rapidly build awareness within specific consumer segments, circumventing the high costs associated with traditional media buying.

Table 2. Overview of influencer marketing vs. mass advertising.

Aspect	Influencer Marketing	Mass Advertising
Definition	Marketing strategy that leverages individuals (influencers) with established audiences to promote brands through personal content.	Traditional advertising method using broad, one-to-many communication via television, radio, billboards, and print and digital display ads.
Trust and Credibility	Built on peer-to-peer influence and parasocial relationships, fostering higher consumer trust and perceived authenticity.	Relies on corporate authority, brand equity, and historical reputation to establish credibility.
Audience Targeting	Highly targeted, as influencers create content that aligns with niche audiences and community-driven interests.	Broad and undifferentiated, aimed at reaching the maximum number of consumers within a generalized demographic.
Engagement Mechanism	Encourages interactive engagement (likes, shares, comments, direct feedback), reinforcing trust and relationship-building.	Primarily passive exposure, relying on repeated impressions to create brand recall and awareness.
Content Format	Relies on personalized, user-generated content (UGC), often shaped by the influencer’s unique style and audience preferences.	Standardized brand messaging designed for mass consumption, often lacking personalization.
Distribution and Amplification	Organically distributed by social media algorithms based on engagement, virality, and AI-driven personalization.	Delivered through paid media placements with fixed reach and frequency, not algorithmically amplified.
Economic Model	Pay-per-post, affiliate commissions, and performance-based incentives (e.g., clicks, conversions).	Fixed ad buys, impressions-based pricing, and large-scale media investments.
Scalability and Cost Efficiency	Cost-effective for emerging brands, with potential for viral growth and high engagement rates.	Better suited for large corporations with high budgets, ensuring broad reach and consistent brand presence.
Regulation and Transparency	Decentralized and less regulated, with concerns over fake followers, undisclosed sponsorships, and engagement fraud.	Highly regulated, adhering to strict advertising laws and disclosure guidelines.
Effectiveness in Brand Building	Stronger for niche brands, new product launches, and community-driven marketing.	More effective for legacy brands, broad market penetration, and long-term brand equity building.
Longevity of Impact	Short-term, campaign-based success, dependent on ongoing influencer credibility and trends.	Long-term brand presence, sustained through repeated exposure and high-budget campaigns.

summarizes the differences between influencer marketing and mass advertising.

2.2.3. The Role of Trust and Engagement in Spreading Information

In the digital era, trust and engagement have become fundamental pillars in determining the spread, credibility, and impact of information within networked environments. Unlike traditional mass media, where information dissemination is largely one-directional and controlled by institutional authorities, digital networks enable interactive, peer-to-peer communication, where content spreads through social validation, participatory engagement, and algorithmic amplification [66]. The effectiveness of digital marketing, online influence, and viral content dissemination is, therefore, heavily dependent on how much trust audiences place in the source of information and how actively they engage with it. This shift has profound implications for consumer behavior, brand communication, and information diffusion, as trust and engagement act as key mediators of content virality, shaping how information is perceived, accepted, and propagated across digital networks [67].

Theoretical Foundations: Trust as a Driver of Information Spread

Trust plays a critical role in determining the credibility of information and the likelihood of its transmission within a network. According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model [68], individuals process information through two cognitive routes: the central route, where they critically evaluate content based on logic and evidence, and the peripheral route, where they rely on heuristics such as trustworthiness, authority, or popularity cues. In digital networks, where users are constantly bombarded with overwhelming volumes of content, the peripheral route dominates, meaning that users often decide whether to share or trust information based on source credibility, social proof, and emotional resonance rather than objective analysis [69].

The Source Credibility Theory further explains that trust in information is largely dependent on the perceived expertise, integrity, and authenticity of the communicator. In the context of digital marketing, this translates into brand trust, influencer credibility, and peer recommendations, all of which influence whether an individual will engage with or spread a particular message. Unlike traditional advertising, which relies on institutional credibility, digital marketing thrives on decentralized trust models, where influence is distributed across individual content creators, community leaders, and peer networks. Empirical research indicates that consumers are significantly more likely to trust user-generated content (UGC) and peer recommendations over corporate-sponsored messages, highlighting the increasing role of distributed social trust in shaping online behavior [70].

Trust also operates at the platform level, where the credibility of the medium affects how users perceive and interact with content. Research suggests that information shared through closed, high-trust networks (e.g., private WhatsApp groups, LinkedIn communities) is more likely to be perceived as reliable than content disseminated through public, algorithm-driven networks (e.g., Facebook, Twitter/X, TikTok), where users are more skeptical of commercial intent and misinformation risks [71]. This dynamic explains why brands increasingly invest in community-building strategies, such as exclusive online forums, subscription-based newsletters, and private membership groups, to foster higher levels of engagement and trust in their messaging [72].

Engagement as the Mechanism of Information Amplification

While trust determines whether individuals accept and share information, engagement dictates its visibility, reach, and virality within digital ecosystems. Engagement encompasses a range of interactive behaviors, including likes, shares, comments, mentions, and participatory actions, all of which function as signals to platform algorithms, influencing how content is ranked, promoted, and spread. Unlike traditional media, where information dissemination follows a linear distribution model, digital platforms operate on engagement-driven diffusion mechanisms, where content that receives higher user interaction is algorithmically amplified, increasing its likelihood of achieving virality [73].

The relationship between engagement and information spread can be analyzed using contagion models and network effect theories. The Viral Coefficient (K-factor), a key metric in network-based marketing, quantifies the extent to which content self-propagates within a social network. Moreover, engagement is not purely quantitative but also qualitative, with different types of engagement producing varying levels of influence and amplification. Research by [74] found that emotionally arousing content—whether positive (awe, joy) or negative (anger, outrage)—tends to generate higher levels of sharing and engagement, reinforcing the role of affective resonance in viral marketing. Additionally, engagement depth matters: while passive interactions such as likes and views contribute to algorithmic ranking, active engagement (comments, discussions, and shares) has a far stronger impact on content visibility and credibility. This is why platforms like LinkedIn prioritize long-form discussions and thoughtful commentary, whereas TikTok and Instagram favor rapid, high-volume engagement metrics, shaping distinct content dissemination patterns across different platforms [75].

Trust, Engagement, and the Challenge of Misinformation

The intertwined nature of trust and engagement presents both opportunities and risks in digital marketing. While high levels of trust and engagement can drive brand loyalty, organic reach, and peer-to-peer advocacy, they can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and manipulated content [76]. There is evidence that false information spreads a lot faster than true information, according to the Misinformation Cascade Model [77]. This is because people often have stronger emotional reactions and are more involved when they are given false information. This is a big deal for digital marketing because companies need to find a mix between being socially responsible and involving as many people as possible. They need to take extra care to make sure that their quest for virality does not hurt people’s trust. More and more, digital platforms and advertisers are using verified accounts, clearly sponsored content, and AI-powered systems that look for false information to build trust and make online activities safer. Bottom-up solutions come in the form of community-driven filtering and spread review systems, like the ones that Wikipedia and Reddit use. These systems work hard to make sure that the material they build is real. The fact that these changes were made supports the idea that trust in digital networks is more of a social construct than a personal trait [78].

The roles of trust and engagement in the process of information spreading are essential for the dynamics of digital marketing, social influence, and viral content diffusion. Trust is the perception of audiences regarding the credibility of information and its shareability, while engagement is the extent of its amplification and reach, thus forming the positive feedback that determines the online behavior [79]. These factors are also influenced by platform algorithms, social proof mechanisms, and cognitive heuristics, and trust-based marketing is therefore crucial for sustainable brand growth in digital networks. As platforms evolve to further enhance engagement-driven content curation, the need for ethical, transparent, and community-centric marketing approaches becomes crucial, ensuring that digital influence is powerful, responsible, and trustworthy [80].

3. Information Diffusion Models in Social Networks

3.1. Classic Models

3.1.1. Epidemiological Models (SIR, SIS, SEIR)—Analogies Between Information Spread and Disease Spread

The diffusion of information in social networks shares fundamental similarities with the spread of infectious diseases, a concept that has led researchers to adopt epidemiological models as a framework for understanding how ideas, trends, and marketing messages propagate through digital and offline communities. These models, originally developed in epidemiology to describe the dynamics of disease outbreaks, are based on the principle that individuals transition through different states of exposure and influence, much like they transition through health conditions in the presence of a contagious virus. By drawing on these models, researchers can analyze the rate, reach, and sustainability of information spread, allowing marketers, policymakers, and social media strategists to predict virality, optimize campaign effectiveness, and mitigate the spread of misinformation [81].

Epidemiological models conceptualize information diffusion as a network-based contagion process, where individuals (nodes) influence their social connections (edges) by transmitting content, just as infected individuals spread a disease through physical or digital contact. The most widely used models in this context include the Susceptible–Infected–Recovered (SIR) model, the Susceptible–Infected–Susceptible (SIS) model, and the Susceptible–Exposed–Infected–Recovered (SEIR) model, each of which provides a mathematical and conceptual framework for understanding how different types of information—whether viral marketing campaigns, political messages, or misinformation—disseminate across social networks [82].

The SIR Model and Irreversible Information Spread

The SIR model is one of the most fundamental epidemiological frameworks used to analyze non-repetitive, irreversible information diffusion, where individuals transition through three distinct states:

• Susceptible (S): Individuals who have not yet encountered the information but are exposed to it through social connections.
• Infected (I): Individuals who have received and are actively sharing the information.
• Recovered (R): Individuals who have lost interest, forgotten, or otherwise ceased to propagate the information.

$${\displaystyle \frac{dS}{dt}}=-\beta SI$$

$${\displaystyle \frac{dI}{dt}}=\beta SI-\gamma I$$

$${\displaystyle \frac{dR}{dt}}=\gamma I$$

where:

🗸

S, I, R = Number (or proportion) of individuals in each state at time t.

🗸

β (Transmission Rate) = The probability of a susceptible individual becoming infected after contact with an infected individual. In viral marketing, this represents content shareability (e.g., how likely a user is to engage with and share a piece of information).

🗸

γ (Recovery Rate) = The probability of an infected individual transitioning to the recovered state, representing the rate at which users lose interest or stop spreading content.

The model operates under the assumption that once individuals move from infected to recovered, they do not return to the susceptible state, mirroring scenarios in which a viral marketing campaign or trending topic reaches saturation and eventually declines in engagement [83]. The rate at which individuals transition from susceptible to infected (information adoption) and from infected to recovered (information decay) is governed by two key parameters: the transmission rate (β) and the recovery rate (γ). The spread of information is determined by the basic reproduction number (R₀), which represents the average number of people an infected individual influences before moving to the recovered state. If R₀ > 1, information spreads exponentially, whereas if R₀ < 1, the diffusion process dies out.

$$R_0={\displaystyle \frac{\beta }{\gamma }}$$

This model is particularly useful for understanding short-lived viral phenomena, such as memes, trending hashtags, or flash marketing campaigns, where content experiences a rapid rise and decline in engagement. For example, research on Twitter trends has shown that hashtags often follow an SIR-like trajectory, experiencing an initial explosion of activity before engagement naturally wanes due to audience fatigue [84]. In marketing, companies often use strategic seeding techniques to ensure that enough initial adopters (high-degree nodes in the network) are exposed to push R₀ beyond the viral threshold, thereby maximizing campaign reach before engagement declines [85].

The SIS Model and Recurrent Information Spread

Unlike the SIR model, which assumes that individuals do not return to the susceptible state, the Susceptible–Infected–Susceptible (SIS) model represents recurrent information spread, where individuals can be repeatedly exposed to and influenced by the same content over time [86]. In this model:

Susceptible (S): Individuals who have not yet engaged with the information but may be influenced.

Infected (I): Individuals who are actively spreading the information.

Susceptible (S) again: Unlike the SIR model, individuals do not “recover” permanently but rather return to a susceptible state, meaning they can be influenced multiple times by the same or a reintroduced piece of content.

The differential equations governing the SIS model are:

$${\displaystyle \frac{dS}{dt}}=-\beta SI+\gamma I$$

(1)

$${\displaystyle \frac{dI}{dt}}=\beta SI-\gamma I$$

(2)

where:

🗸

S, I = Number (or proportion) of individuals in each state at time t.

🗸

β (Transmission Rate) = Probability of a susceptible individual becoming infected (i.e., seeing and resharing the content).

🗸

γ (Recovery Rate) = Probability of an infected individual losing interest and becoming susceptible again.

The SIS model is particularly relevant in scenarios where information experiences recurring waves of engagement, such as:

• Recurring Advertising Campaigns: Brands that use retargeting strategies to continuously expose consumers to the same product or service (e.g., holiday sales promotions, subscription reminders).
• Political Messaging and Propaganda: Political narratives that resurface during election cycles, gaining renewed engagement each time they become relevant.
• Algorithm-Driven Content Recirculation: Social media algorithms that reintroduce past content based on user interaction history, ensuring that engagement never fully declines but instead fluctuates cyclically.

In marketing, the SIS model is particularly valuable for loyalty programs and brand engagement strategies, where companies seek to keep consumers continuously engaged rather than allowing interest to decay permanently. For instance, platforms like Spotify, Netflix, and Amazon Prime use recommendation systems to ensure that users remain in a perpetual cycle of engagement, resembling SIS dynamics rather than SIR-style one-time interactions [87].

The SEIR Model and Delayed Information Adoption

A more advanced version of the SIR model, the Susceptible–Exposed–Infected–Recovered (SEIR) model, introduces an exposed (E) state, accounting for scenarios where individuals have been introduced to information but do not immediately engage or share it. This reflects real-world phenomena where consumers:

• Need time to process and evaluate information before sharing it (latent period);
• Encounter content but only engage when socially reinforced (e.g., multiple exposures increase the likelihood of sharing);
• Delay adoption due to external factors such as credibility concerns, competing narratives, or decision inertia.

The SEIR model is particularly relevant for:

• High-involvement products and services, where consumers go through an information evaluation phase before making a purchase decision (e.g., cars, real estate, B2B software).
• Scientific and political information diffusion, where people do not immediately share or adopt new ideas but rather wait for peer validation or expert consensus.
• Social media echo chambers, where individuals see but do not engage with information until they observe collective action within their community.

$${\displaystyle \frac{dS}{dt}}=-\beta SI$$

$${\displaystyle \frac{dE}{dt}}=\beta SI-\sigma E$$

$${\displaystyle \frac{dI}{dt}}=\sigma E-\gamma I$$

$${\displaystyle \frac{dR}{dt}}=\gamma I$$

Here, we have:

🗸

S (Susceptible): Individuals who have not yet seen the content but may be exposed.

🗸

E (Exposed): Individuals who have seen the content but have not yet engaged (e.g., users who scroll past a post but do not react yet).

🗸

I (Infected): Individuals who actively engage with and share the content.

🗸

R (Recovered): Individuals who stop sharing the content.

🗸

β (Transmission Rate): Probability of a susceptible individual being exposed after contact with an infected individual.

🗸

σ (Incubation Rate): Rate at which exposed individuals become actively engaged (move from E to I).

🗸

γ (Recovery Rate): Rate at which infected individuals stop sharing the content.

Research suggests that SEIR dynamics explain why some trends take longer to reach virality, as engagement is often delayed due to the time required for trust-building and credibility assessment [88].

Table 3. Key differences between SIR, SIS, and SEIR models in viral marketing.

Aspect	SIR Model	SIS Model	SEIR Model
Recovery Mechanism	Users eventually stop spreading content permanently.	Users can lose interest but later re-engage.	Users experience a delay before engaging, modeling passive exposure before sharing.
Best Used For	One-time viral campaigns, news cycles.	Recurring social media trends and continuous brand interactions.	Gradual viral growth, delayed adoption, and engagement buildup.
Exposed Phase (E)	No (users engage instantly upon contact).	No (users can become susceptible again).	Yes (users may see content but delay engagement).
Typical Example	A trending hashtag that quickly gains traction but dies out.	A meme cycle that resurfaces repeatedly over time.	A viral challenge that spreads slowly before reaching peak engagement (e.g., TikTok trends).

shows the key differences between SIR, SIS, and SEIR models in viral marketing.

Epidemiological models provide a powerful theoretical and mathematical framework for understanding how information spreads in social networks, offering insights into viral marketing, social influence, and digital content propagation. The SIR model explains short-lived viral trends, the SIS model captures recurring engagement cycles, and the SEIR model accounts for delayed adoption processes. These models, when integrated with real-time data analytics and machine learning algorithms, enable marketers and social media strategists to optimize campaign reach, predict engagement patterns, and mitigate the spread of misinformation. As digital networks continue to evolve, these models will remain indispensable tools for analyzing, forecasting, and strategically engineering the diffusion of ideas, products, and narratives in an increasingly networked society [89].

3.1.2. Threshold Models (LT, IC)—Conditions for Adoption and Virality

Information diffusion in social networks is not merely a function of random exposure but often follows structured adoption mechanisms, where individuals decide whether to engage with or share information based on social influence and perceived benefits [90]. Unlike epidemiological models, which treat information spread as a biological contagion process, threshold models introduce a more behavioral, decision-theoretic perspective, focusing on how individuals make deliberate choices based on their social context and exposure level. The two most influential models in this category are the Linear Threshold (LT) model and the Independent Cascade (IC) model, both of which describe the conditions necessary for widespread adoption and virality in social networks. These models provide formal frameworks for predicting when a new idea, product, or trend will achieve mass adoption, making them particularly relevant for viral marketing, political mobilization, and digital content dissemination [91].

The Linear Threshold (LT) Model: Influence Accumulation and Collective Decision-Making

The Linear Threshold (LT) model assumes that individuals in a social network adopt new information or behaviors only when a sufficient proportion of their neighbors have already done so. In this framework, each individual (node) is assigned a personal adoption threshold (θ), representing the minimum fraction of their social connections that must be activated before they also adopt the information [92]. Formally, a node v becomes “infected” (i.e., adopts the information) if the sum of the influence weights from its already activated neighbors exceeds its threshold:

$$\sum _{\mathrm{u}\in \mathrm{N}\left(\mathrm{v}\right)}{\mathrm{w}}_{\mathrm{u}\mathrm{v}}\ge {\mathsf{\theta }}_{\mathrm{v}}$$

where w_uv represents the weight of influence from node u to node v, and N(v) is the set of neighboring nodes. This model reflects real-world scenarios where individuals are hesitant to adopt new behaviors until they observe a critical mass of their peers doing the same, leading to cascading effects when enough people cross their respective thresholds [84]. The LT model is particularly useful for explaining collective behavior shifts, such as:

• Social media trends and hashtag activism, where individuals engage only after a perceived “tipping point” of participation is reached.
• Product adoption in digital marketing, where consumers are more likely to purchase a new product if they see a sufficient number of friends or influencers endorsing it.
• Political movements and protests, where participation often depends on seeing a critical number of peers taking action.

One of the most famous empirical applications of threshold-based diffusion is the study of viral challenges and social mobilization campaigns, such as the Ice Bucket Challenge (2014), where participation surged only after enough individuals saw their immediate social circles engaging. Similarly, crowdfunding success on platforms like Kickstarter follows threshold dynamics, as projects often gain momentum only after reaching an initial credibility threshold [93].

The Independent Cascade (IC) Model: Stochastic Influence and Network Propagation

The Independent Cascade (IC) model is one of the most widely used information diffusion models in network science, particularly in viral marketing and influence propagation [88]. Unlike the LT model, which assumes that each individual has an independent probability of influencing their neighbors, rather than requiring a cumulative threshold of adoption. In this framework, when a node adopts new information, it has a fixed probability (p) of activating each of its susceptible neighbors in the next time step [94]. This probabilistic and discrete nature makes the IC model more analogous to word-of-mouth marketing, where each instance of exposure has a randomized chance of persuasion rather than a deterministic threshold [95]. The basic concept of the IC model is as follows:

• Each activated (infected) node has a single chance to influence its neighbors in the next time step.
• If a node fails to activate a neighbor, it cannot try again in later rounds.
• The process continues until no more activations occur in the network.

The probability that an inactive node v is activated at time t by an active neighbor u is given by the influence probability (u), which represents the strength of the connection between the two nodes. For a node v with multiple active neighbors at time t, the probability of activation is as follows:

$$P\left(v is activated at time t+1\right)=1-\prod _{uϵA_t}\left(1-p\left(u,v\right)\right)$$

where:

🗸

A_t is the set of active (infected) nodes at time t.

🗸

p(u,v) is the activation probability from node u to node v.

🗸

The product $\prod _{uϵA_t}\left(1-p\left(u,v\right)\right)$ represents the probability that none of the active neighbors successfully activate node v.

🗸

Taking 1 − *this value* gives the probability that at least one of them succeeds in activating node v.

This distinction makes the IC model particularly applicable to:

• Viral advertising campaigns, where brand endorsements from different sources independently increase the chance of conversion.
• News and rumor spreading, where each interaction carries a probabilistic likelihood of further dissemination.
• Influencer-driven marketing, where the probability of adoption depends on how influential the original sharer is within the network.

Table 4. Differences between LT and IC models.

Aspect	Linear Threshold (LT) Model	Independent Cascade (IC) Model
Activation Mechanism	A node is activated when the sum of influences from its active neighbors exceeds a threshold.	Nodes are activated independently by active neighbors with a probability.
Propagation Rule	Nodes continuously check if their cumulative influence exceeds their personal threshold before activating.	Each active node has one chance to activate its inactive neighbors.
Probability vs. Threshold-Based	Activation depends on a fixed threshold, meaning some nodes require multiple influences to activate.	Activation depends on random chance with a predefined probability for each edge.
Spread Dynamics	Slower but more stable spread, requiring multiple influencers for some nodes to activate.	Faster initial spread, but activation can be random and inconsistent due to probabilistic influence.
Time Step Mechanism	Nodes check their threshold condition continuously before activation.	Discrete rounds, where activation happens simultaneously in each round.
Once-and-Done Rule?	No, inactive nodes continue accumulating influence over time until their threshold is met.	Yes, once a node tries (and fails) to activate a neighbor, it cannot try again.
Best Used For	Behavioral influence modeling, brand adoption strategies, and long-term engagement analysis.	Viral marketing, seeding strategies, and social media engagement forecasting (e.g., maximizing immediate spread).
Example Application	A social movement campaign gains traction gradually, as people need to see it multiple times before engaging.	A flash sale spreads quickly as people randomly share it with varying success.

below shows the key differences between the two threshold models.

Conditions for Virality: Network Structure and Seed Selection

For both LT and IC models, achieving large-scale diffusion depends on two critical factors:

• Network Topology: The structure of the network, including degree distribution, clustering coefficient, and path length, determines how information propagates. Highly interconnected communities may have high internal adoption but struggle to spread beyond their local clusters unless bridge nodes facilitate cross-community diffusion.
• Seed Selection: The choice of initial adopters (seeds) significantly affects the final spread of information. In marketing, influencer seeding strategies often focus on individuals with high centrality metrics (degree, betweenness, eigenvector), ensuring that the campaign reaches high-impact nodes first [96].

The Influence Maximization Problem, a key challenge in information diffusion studies, seeks to determine the optimal set of initial adopters that maximizes spread under LT or IC dynamics. Algorithmic approaches, such as Greedy Approximation Algorithms and machine learning-based Influence Estimation, have been developed to identify strategic seeding points in large-scale networks, enabling brands to maximize engagement and viral reach efficiently [97].

Applications in Digital Marketing and Social Influence

Both the LT and IC models provide essential insights into how marketing campaigns should be designed to maximize reach and engagement. The LT model is particularly effective for community-driven adoption strategies, where content must gain momentum within clusters before breaking into the wider network. In contrast, the IC model is more relevant for influencer-based campaigns and word-of-mouth diffusion, where the probability of adoption is dependent on individual exposure events rather than cumulative influence [98].

Real-world applications of these models include the following:

• TikTok Algorithm and Content Virality: TikTok’s “For You” algorithm amplifies content based on independent interaction probabilities, resembling an IC-like propagation mechanism, where each exposure event contributes to increased engagement likelihood.
• Amazon and Netflix Recommendation Systems: Platforms use LT-like diffusion strategies, where user adoption of content (e.g., watching a movie, purchasing a product) influences friend recommendations and social proof mechanisms.
• Political Campaign Strategy: Political mobilization often follows LT model adoption patterns, where individuals only engage after observing widespread peer participation (e.g., voter turnout campaigns) [99].

Threshold models, including the Linear Threshold (LT) and Independent Cascade (IC) models, provide a decision-theoretic perspective on information diffusion, offering insights into how individuals adopt new ideas based on cumulative influence (LT) or probabilistic activation (IC). Unlike epidemiological models, which treat information as a passive contagion, threshold models emphasize the role of social reinforcement, credibility, and decision-making processes in shaping content virality and adoption dynamics [100]. These models have become cornerstones of modern network marketing strategies, enabling brands, policymakers, and digital platforms to optimize influencer selection, viral campaign design, and engagement amplification strategies. As social networks continue evolving, integrating machine learning and real-time data analytics with threshold-based diffusion frameworks will further refine predictive models of information spread, unlocking new frontiers in personalized marketing and audience targeting [101].

3.2. Modern Computational Models

AI and ML-Based Predictive Models for Information Spread

The increasing complexity of social networks, digital interactions, and online behaviors has necessitated the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)-based models to predict, analyze, and optimize information diffusion. While classic diffusion models such as the epidemiological (SIR, SIS, SEIR) and threshold (LT, IC) models provide foundational insights into the mechanics of information spread, they often rely on simplifying assumptions about network structure, homogeneous transmission probabilities, and static user behavior [102]. In contrast, AI and ML-driven approaches allow for adaptive, data-driven modeling that can dynamically adjust to real-time network interactions, learning from historical diffusion patterns, user engagement metrics, and external contextual factors to make highly accurate predictions about the future spread of content. AI and ML-based diffusion models integrate graph theory, probabilistic modeling, deep learning, and reinforcement learning to uncover complex relationships within social networks [103]. These models not only improve predictive accuracy but also enable strategic optimization of information dissemination, allowing marketers, policymakers, and platform designers to identify high-impact influencers, prevent misinformation spread, and enhance viral marketing effectiveness. As digital ecosystems continue to expand, AI-driven approaches have become indispensable tools for analyzing and controlling information propagation in large-scale, dynamic networks [104].

Neural Network-Based Diffusion Prediction

One of the most widely used AI approaches for information diffusion modeling is deep learning, particularly through Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Transformer-based architectures. Unlike traditional network models that rely on fixed parameters and predefined diffusion rules, neural networks can automatically learn the underlying dynamics of information spread by analyzing vast amounts of social media interactions, engagement data, and historical trends [105]. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a state-of-the-art technique for modeling diffusion processes in social networks. Since social networks are inherently graph-structured data, where individuals (nodes) interact through relationships (edges), GNNs leverage message-passing algorithms to encode the complex dependencies between users [106]. A key advantage of GNNs is their ability to capture higher-order interactions, meaning that they do not merely consider a user’s direct neighbors but also multi-hop influence effects across the entire network [107].

For example, in viral marketing, a GNN-based diffusion model can predict:

➢

Which users are most likely to adopt and share content based on their past behavior and network position.

➢

The most influential users in a network, helping brands choose the best people to start a viral campaign. It can also find bridge nodes—users who connect different communities—allowing content to spread beyond isolated groups.

➢

How information cascades will evolve over time, allowing brands to optimize content seeding strategies.

➢

How false information spreads, and flag unusual patterns that suggest bot activity or coordinated manipulation. Social media platforms use this to identify and limit fake news before it reaches a wide audience.

➢

The likelihood of saturation and fatigue, helping companies avoid overexposure and advertising burnout.

➢

Early engagement patterns, to determine if a new meme, product, or campaign will gain traction. Marketers and platforms use this data to promote emerging trends before competitors catch on.

A particularly influential study by [106] demonstrated that GNNs significantly outperform traditional threshold and epidemiological models in predicting viral trends on platforms like Twitter and TikTok, as they adaptively learn evolving engagement patterns without requiring predefined diffusion assumptions. In addition to modeling information diffusion, GNNs have been increasingly utilized in personalized content recommendation systems. For example, platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Netflix apply GNN-based architectures to analyze users’ network connections and behavior, suggesting content most likely to drive engagement and increase time spent on the platform. By dynamically adapting to changes in user interests and network structures, these systems enhance the early promotion of viral content and trends.

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Temporal Prediction

While GNNs excel at capturing spatial network dependencies, they often struggle with temporal evolution—the dynamic changes in information spread over time [108]. This is where Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs), and Transformer-based models such as BERT and GPT come into play. RNN-based approaches are particularly useful for:

• Forecasting the lifespan of viral content, identifying when a trend will peak and when it will decline.
• Detecting engagement cycles, allowing marketers to time content re-boosting strategies effectively.
• Understanding user re-engagement behavior, helping brands optimize ad retargeting strategies.

For instance, an LSTM-based model trained on historical engagement data can predict whether a particular tweet, YouTube video, or Instagram post will experience a second wave of virality, allowing marketers to pre-emptively adjust their promotional strategies. In e-commerce marketing, AI-driven engagement forecasting enables dynamic ad spend allocation, ensuring that marketing budgets are optimized toward high-impact content rather than wasted on declining trends [109].

Reinforcement Learning for Optimal Diffusion Strategies

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has gained increasing prominence in network-based marketing and information diffusion optimization. Unlike supervised learning approaches that rely on labeled data, RL models learn through trial and error, continuously adjusting strategies based on reward signals from network interactions. In the context of information spread, RL is particularly valuable for:

• Influence maximization: Determining the most effective set of initial seed users who will maximize content reach.
• Misinformation containment: Identifying the optimal intervention points in a network to minimize fake news propagation.
• Personalized content distribution: Optimizing the delivery of news, advertisements, or brand messages based on real-time user engagement data [110].

A key advancement in RL-based diffusion modeling is multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where multiple AI agents simulate different behavioral roles in a social network (e.g., early adopters, skeptics, amplifiers). Studies show that MARL can outperform traditional greedy algorithms in maximizing long-term engagement, as it accounts for adaptive user behavior rather than assuming static influence probabilities [111]. For example, platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram employ RL-based recommender systems that dynamically adjust content visibility based on real-time engagement signals, ensuring that highly engaging posts are continuously reintroduced to new audiences. This self-optimizing diffusion process is fundamentally different from classical marketing models, as it is constantly learning and evolving rather than relying on fixed heuristics [112].

Table 5. Summary of the 3 computational models.

Aspect	Neural Network-Based Diffusion Prediction (GNNs, Transformers)	Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Temporal Prediction	Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Optimal Diffusion
Core Concept	Uses deep learning to model information diffusion in social networks by learning from historical engagement and network structure.	Uses sequential learning models (RNNs, LSTMs) to predict how information spreads over time.	Uses trial-and-error learning to optimize diffusion strategies dynamically based on reward signals from network interactions.
Key Strength	Learns complex network structures and multi-hop influence effects without predefined rules.	Captures engagement patterns over time, forecasting content lifespan and engagement cycles.	Optimizes marketing strategies dynamically, learning the best content seeding or misinformation containment strategies.
Best Used For	Predicting which users will share content. Identifying influencers and bridge nodes. Understanding how content spreads through multi-hop influence.	Forecasting when content will peak or decline. Predicting user re-engagement behavior. Optimizing ad retargeting strategies.	Finding optimal seed users for maximal reach. Containing misinformation spread. Personalized content distribution using real-time engagement.
Major Advantage	Highly adaptive—does not require predefined diffusion assumptions; learns directly from social media data.	Handles time-dependent trends, making it ideal for tracking repeat virality and engagement cycles.	Self-learning—continuously improves diffusion strategies based on network interactions.
Weaknesses	Struggles with time-dependent patterns since it focuses on network topology rather than temporal evolution.	Less effective at modeling complex network structures compared to GNNs.	Requires significant computational resources due to iterative learning.
Example Application	TikTok, YouTube, Netflix recommendations—suggesting content based on user networks. Predicting viral marketing success.	Twitter virality forecasting—predicting when a tweet will trend again. E-commerce dynamic ad spending—adjusting marketing budgets based on engagement cycles.	Influence maximization—choosing the best influencers to launch viral campaigns. TikTok’s dynamic content boosting—ensuring high-engagement posts are reintroduced to audiences.
Unique Feature	Deep learning-based pattern recognition of complex social network influence.	Temporal forecasting—identifies when engagement waves occur.	Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)—models different user roles (early adopters, skeptics, amplifiers) to optimize long-term engagement.

below summarizes key features and differences between the three computational models analyzed above.

Applications in Viral Marketing, Misinformation Detection, and Trend Forecasting

AI-powered information diffusion models have been widely adopted across various domains, particularly in marketing, public health communication, and misinformation control [113].

• Viral Marketing and Ad Targeting: AI-based models help brands identify high-impact influencers, predict which content will go viral, and optimize real-time ad placements to maximize return on investment (ROI).
• Misinformation Detection: ML-based classifiers trained on text, engagement patterns, and network structure can automatically detect fake news and bot-generated content, preventing harmful misinformation cascades.
• Trend Forecasting: AI models analyze search patterns, engagement metrics, and social interactions to predict emerging trends before they reach peak virality, giving brands a first-mover advantage in content creation.

Many major tech platforms leverage deep learning-based diffusion models to predict user engagement trends, optimize content promotion, and mitigate misinformation spread. These models rely on historical user behavior, network interactions, and engagement patterns to forecast how content will propagate across digital ecosystems. By analyzing real-time social dynamics, platforms such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook can proactively identify emerging trends, prevent the amplification of harmful content, and refine algorithmic content recommendations [114]. For instance, Google Trends applies time-series forecasting models combined with machine learning algorithms to track fluctuations in search interest across different regions and demographics. By analyzing spikes in query volume, these models can identify emerging trends before they reach peak popularity, allowing businesses, journalists, and policymakers to react accordingly. The forecasting techniques employed by Google Trends integrate seasonality adjustments, topic clustering, and anomaly detection, distinguishing organically emerging trends from artificially amplified, bot-driven activities. This ensures that search insights remain representative of genuine user interest rather than manipulated online discourse [115].

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are utilized by Twitter’s trend prediction algorithms in order to monitor the temporal progression of tweets, hashtags, and subjects. Engagement velocity, which evaluates the speed at which a topic makes connections and user influence ratings, which show the effect of key persons driving the discussion, are two of the numerous parameters that these models evaluate [116]. Both of these characteristics are extremely essential. In addition to this, they assess the connection of the network, which allows them to ascertain the flow of information among the various user groups. They also conduct sentiment analysis in order to determine whether the majority of presentations on a certain subject are positive, negative, or neutral. Twitter’s artificial intelligence is able to precisely anticipate, with the help of these analytical criteria, whether a certain hashtag or subject will continue to be popular within a small audience or if it will become renowned all over the world. By utilizing its predictive capabilities, Twitter is able to enhance its content ranking algorithms, reduce the algorithmic amplification of disinformation, and bring topics that are both current and significant to the attention of its users [117].

Conversely, Facebook combines natural language processing (NLP), GNN-based propagation analysis, and adversarial learning approaches using deep learning models for disinformation detection. Beginning with text-based credibility analysis, which employs NLP to identify misleading or fraudulent assertions based on language patterns and factual discrepancies [118], these models evaluate material from several perspectives. Facebook’s artificial intelligence has historically tracked engagement pattern abnormalities, including postings with coordinated inauthentic behavior—such as mass-sharing by phony accounts or bot-driven amplification—that show deception. These artificial intelligence methods cross-reference viral postings with fact-checking databases from reliable companies such as Snopes, PolitiFact, and FactCheck.org to improve accuracy and ensure that false narratives may be recognized and downgraded before they find a broad audience. Facebook’s AI-driven algorithms can automatically limit the dissemination of erroneous material by lowering its algorithmic reach or attaching fact-checking alerts informing users of possible errors by always learning from past misinformation patterns and developing social interactions [119].

These AI-driven diffusion models work together to help manage digital ecosystems proactively and make sure that trending topics, viral content, and misinformation are handled properly and not just left to spread however they wish. As online platforms are still changing, the combination of deep learning, network analysis, and actual real-time engagement tracking will become more and more vital in the process of understanding how information travels through the global digital networks. Social media platforms can therefore use these technologies to moderate between encouraging organic user engagement and avoiding the negative impacts of rapid, uncontrolled information diffusion [120].

4. Role of Influencers and Opinion Leaders

4.1. Identifying Influencers: Metrics and AI-Powered Detection

The rise of social media has reshaped the way information spreads, placing influencers and opinion leaders at the center of digital discourse and marketing strategies. Unlike traditional advertising models that rely on mass media exposure, modern digital influence operates within networked structures, where a select group of highly connected individuals hold disproportionate sway over the attitudes, behaviors, and purchasing decisions of their audiences [121]. Identifying these key individuals is essential for businesses, political movements, and media platforms seeking to maximize the reach, engagement, and conversion potential of their campaigns. While the identification of influencers was once based on simple heuristics—such as follower count or engagement rates—advancements in network science, graph theory, and artificial intelligence (AI) have led to sophisticated, data-driven methods for pinpointing high-impact individuals within complex social ecosystems [122].

A basic strategy for identifying influencers is centrality analysis, which is a vital tool in network analysis that determines the positional role of the nodes (users) in a social network. Centrality measures are used to determine the level of connectivity of an individual, their influence in the sharing of information, and their role in the network architecture [123]. Degree centrality, one of the simplest measures, determines influencers by calculating the number of links that a user has. Although this approach is good for finding out the macro-influencers who have many connections, it does not capture the full influence of a user beyond their immediate network. Other more sophisticated measures include betweenness centrality, which tells us how many times a user can be considered as a relay between two or more communities and, for this reason, is useful for the transmission of information across networks. Some of these people may not have the highest number of followers, but they are the only connection that can allow content to reach parts of the network that are otherwise isolated, and they are very valuable in viral marketing. Similarly, closeness centrality tells us how close a user is to reaching every other node in the network and reveals the users who are in a good position to transmit information to a large number of people in a short time [124].

PageRank, which was initially developed by Google for the purpose of ranking web pages, has become a prominent method for identifying influential people inside social networks. This is in addition to the standard centrality measurements that have been discussed previously. The fact that PageRank assigns influence scores to users based on the quality and quantity of their connections demonstrates that the effect of a user’s connections not only influences the user’s direct influence but also their impact [125]. This recursive ranking algorithm differentiates between persons whose influence may be affected by bots or low-value accounts and high-quality influencers whose followers are well-connected. Bots and low-value accounts are examples of the former. PageRank algorithms that have been modified are utilized on social media platforms such as Twitter and Instagram in order to suggest influencers for commercial partnerships. This helps to ensure that marketing efforts are directed toward genuine, high-impact individuals rather than profiles that have been fraudulently enhanced [126].

Although these network-based metrics can be useful in identifying influencers, the rate of growth and change in modern social networks requires an AI-based influencer detection system that is beyond basic graph analysis. Current research on influencers has leveraged Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and natural language processing (NLP) for the sentiment analysis of the influencer detection and ranking process [127]. These AI-based approaches take into account various criteria such as the quality of engagement, the polarity of the sentiment, the virality of the content, and the temporal activity in order to offer a more accurate view of influence. Unlike traditional metrics, which focus more on historical connectivity, AI models are able to learn from real-time changes in the influence of users and may be able to detect potential opinion leaders whose influence is not yet visible in static network rankings [128].

Another area of application where the use of AI in influencer detection has been a significant breakthrough is in differentiating between real and fake influence. Influencer marketing has become a multi-billion-dollar industry, and with it comes fake engagement, bots, and the purchase of followers and engagement pods. Follower size and engagement rate are easily faked, hence the need for AI-based fraud detection in order to provide authenticity in influencer marketing [129]. There are many ways to distinguish between real and inauthentic engagement and thus help avoid the brand from working with fake influencers who have bought their influence, including bot behavior patterns, anomalous engagement spikes, and unnatural follower growth curves. Furthermore, context-aware AI models are able to help in identifying the right influencer for a brand or an organization in any given industry. Most traditional influencer ranking tools are inefficient because they employ generic measures of influence that do not capture niche expertise and relevant audiences [130]. AI models that have been trained on topic modeling, semantic similarity analysis, and audience demographics can help to improve influencer detection by identifying opinion leaders who share the brand’s values and the fans’ interests. For instance, an AI influencer detection system for the fitness industry would not only rank influencers based on overall engagement but also analyze content authenticity, credibility of expertise, and audience composition to ensure that brands work with trusted fitness personalities and not just regular high-engaging influencers [131].

Marketers are able to estimate the future effect trajectory of content providers who are just beginning their careers thanks to predictive modeling, which was made feasible by the introduction of artificial intelligence into the influencer discovery process. AI-driven techniques have the ability to uncover emerging stars, which are content creators whose interaction patterns signal that they are likely to undergo exponential development. This is in contrast to systems that solely focus on well-known influencers. By analyzing the performance of past content, audience retention rates, and cross-platform reach, machine learning algorithms may be able to determine which individuals are most likely to have a significant influence within a specific time frame. Consequently, this makes it possible for marketers to reach agreements before the expenditures associated with influencer marketing begin to rise [132].

4.2. Micro vs. Macro-Influencers

The rise of influencer marketing has brought forth a key distinction between the macro-influencers who have large, visible audiences and the micro-influencers who operate within smaller, more niche communities [133]. This is not only based on the follower count but includes details about engagement dynamics, trust mechanisms, audience composition, and strategic effectiveness of digital marketing campaigns. While macro-influencers help in expanding the brand’s reach and visibility, micro-influencers usually offer higher authenticity, better audience engagement, and more persuasion in certain communities. It is important for brands, advertisers, and social media strategists to understand these differences in order to harness the full impact, efficiency, and return-on-investment (ROI) of influencer-driven campaigns [134].

Macro-Influencers: Reach, Visibility, and Mass Appeal

Macro-influencers are typically defined as individuals with hundreds of thousands to millions of followers across social media platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter [135]. These influencers include celebrities, high-profile content creators, and industry leaders whose large audiences allow for extensive exposure and mass communication. From a network science perspective, macro-influencers often possess high degree centrality, meaning they are directly connected to a vast number of followers, enabling their content to spread widely with minimal resistance. Their influence is amplified by platform algorithms, which prioritize content from users with high engagement metrics, further increasing their visibility. However, while macro-influencers provide unmatched reach, their engagement rates tend to be significantly lower compared to micro-influencers [136]. Studies have shown that as an influencer’s follower count increases, their engagement rate often declines due to the dilution of personal interaction and the increased diversity of their audience. Followers of macro-influencers are typically passive consumers of content rather than active participants, reducing the effectiveness of direct recommendations and interactive brand campaigns. Additionally, macro-influencers often collaborate with multiple brands across different industries, leading to potential sponsorship fatigue, where their audience becomes desensitized to branded content [137].

Macro-influencers are ideal for brand awareness campaigns, product launches, and large-scale promotions, where the primary goal is to maximize visibility rather than foster deep consumer engagement. Industries such as fashion, technology, and entertainment frequently rely on macro-influencers to generate buzz and establish market presence, particularly when entering new demographics or geographic regions. However, due to their high sponsorship costs and lower engagement rates, macro-influencers are less effective for campaigns requiring high levels of trust, community engagement, or direct call-to-action responses [138].

Micro-Influencers: Authenticity, Engagement, and Community Trust

In contrast, micro-influencers—typically defined as individuals with 1000 to 100,000 followers—hold significant influence within tightly knit, highly engaged communities. Unlike macro-influencers, whose authority is derived from sheer audience size, micro-influencers build credibility through consistent interaction, niche expertise, and trust-based relationships with their followers [139]. Research in digital marketing and social influence suggests that micro-influencers exhibit higher engagement rates (likes, comments, shares) than macro-influencers, as their followers perceive them as relatable, approachable, and personally invested in the community. One of the key advantages of micro-influencers lies in their ability to create meaningful connections with their audience. Their recommendations are often viewed as authentic and experience-driven, rather than purely commercial. Studies indicate that consumers are more likely to trust endorsements from micro-influencers because they feel like peer recommendations rather than celebrity promotions [140]. This aligns with Social Identity Theory [141], which suggests that individuals are more influenced by those they perceive as part of their in-group, rather than distant, high-status figures.

Micro-influencers are highly effective for targeted, engagement-driven campaigns, particularly in niche markets such as fitness, beauty, gaming, and eco-friendly products. Brands seeking to drive conversions, encourage user-generated content, or foster brand loyalty often prefer micro-influencers due to their personalized communication style and strong audience relationships [142]. Additionally, because micro-influencers operate in specific domains, their content is more likely to be perceived as expert-driven and credible, enhancing brand reputation and trust. The affordability of micro-influencers is yet another significant benefit. Micro-influencers frequently charge lower rates while generating more interaction per dollar invested, in contrast to macro-influencers who demand exorbitant sponsorship costs [143]. In order to achieve more network penetration and greater authenticity, several organizations use multi-micro-influencer strategies, working with several small-scale influencers rather than just one macro-influencer [144].

The Hybrid Approach: Combining Macro- and Micro-Influencers for Maximum Impact

Although the strategic roles that macro- and micro-influencers play are distinct from one another, the most successful digital marketing campaigns typically mix both types of influencers in order to increase both exposure and engagement. In the same way that a firm may employ micro-influencers to enhance engagement, generate reviews, and facilitate conversions inside certain groups, it may also utilize macro-influencers to expose a product to a broad audience [145]. The utilization of this hybrid technique guarantees that marketing endeavors are not only highly visible but also subjected to active debate, trust, and involvement. Through extensive exposure, a macro-influencer might be of assistance to a global beauty company in the process of establishing brand recognition for a newly introduced skincare product. In order to ensure that the product is appealing to both the mainstream market and the community, the brand might communicate with a large number of micro-influencers at the same time. These micro-influencers would give in-depth assessments, lessons, and ideas that are motivated by peers. Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok are examples of platforms that improve this method. These platforms allow businesses to leverage multi-tiered influencer marketing and analytics driven by artificial intelligence to distribute content in the most effective manner and monitor the level of interaction [146].

4.3. Authenticity and Trust: Challenges in Influencer Marketing and the Impact of Fake Followers and Bot-Driven Amplification

When it comes to effective brand partnerships and audience participation in the digital era, authenticity and trust are the key components. This is because influencer marketing has evolved to become a multi-billion-dollar industry. According to [147], influencer marketing is characterized by human relationships, relatability, and an aura of seeming genuineness. In contrast, this is not the case with traditional advertising, which is dependent on a corporate message that has been designed appropriately. More often than not, people trust those who have power, not just because of their expertise but also because of their honesty. Instead of providing contrived endorsements, consumers expect influencers to make genuine suggestions regarding products and services. On the other hand, maintaining trust has become more difficult as a result of the increased profitability and scope of influencer marketing. False followers, bot-driven amplification, and fraudulent interaction strategies are some of the key challenges that brands, platforms, and audiences are encountering during this time period. Due to the fact that these problems have produced the ecosystem of influencers to be in a state of legitimacy crisis, businesses are being forced to re-evaluate the methods by which they locate, assess, and collaborate with digital individuals [148].

When it comes to influencer marketing, one of the most significant challenges is the phenomenon of influencers intentionally expanding their following in order to give the appearance that they have a higher impact than they actually have [149]. Because there is a significant correlation between the number of followers and brand agreements, many influencers, ranging from newly discovered micro-influencers to well-known digital celebrities, purchase fake followers through bot networks or illegal organizations that provide fast audience statistic augmentation. In spite of the fact that they do boost the number of followers that an influencer has, these fake accounts have no impact whatsoever on the real engagement, contact, or conversion rates. As a consequence, the funds that were allocated for the marketing of the brand are being wasted. Based on the findings of several studies, it has been determined that as much as twenty percent of the followers on particularly influential accounts might be fake. Instagram and Twitter are two examples of social media platforms that constantly erase fake accounts in order to preserve the integrity of their own ecosystems. As bot networks continue to become more complicated and identification becomes more difficult, the inflation of bogus followers presents a significant risk to the legitimacy of influencer marketing in general [150].

Bot-driven engagement amplification—the process by which influencers use automated systems to purposefully boost the likes, comments, shares, and video views on their posts—is another, more subtle challenge. Creating the impression of significant involvement, engagement bots let influencers appear more powerful than they really are. False followers, on the other hand, just count more members of an audience; they have no other effect. This approach is especially problematic as brand collaborations usually rely on engagement statistics to ascertain the degree of influence effectiveness [151]. It is challenging for marketers to separate natural engagement from artificial amplification as AI-driven engagement bots may replicate real interactions, including the creation of automated comments, likes, and even discussions that imitate human behavior. This causes a false sense of audience loyalty to develop, which drives marketers to engage influencers who might not have a meaningful community effect or real purchasing power over their audience [152].

Another issue related to that is the rising trend of engagement pods where influencers throw private parties where they like, comment, and share each other’s posts in order to manipulate social media platforms. While not as explicit as the use of bots to increase post reach, engagement pods distort the actual fan base of an influencer and make them seem more popular than they actually are. These tactics are most rife on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter/X where the platform’s algorithms favor content that receives a lot of engagement in the first few minutes, which means that influencers have had to create engagement through the use of coordinated group interactions [153]. Therefore, brands that use engagement rates to determine the effectiveness of influencers end up paying for fake numbers and for influencers who have way less engagement than they claim to have. The popularity of the strategies for inauthentic engagement has also been associated with the decline of the credibility of influencer marketing. Research shows that consumers are now aware of branded content overload, which can lead to influencer fatigue, a phenomenon in which followers start to view influencers as corporate proxies rather than creative talents [58]. This loss of trust is especially noticeable in areas like beauty, fitness, and technology that are full of influencer ads, and people question whether the endorsements are real or just paid advertisements. Some influencers, having noticed this change, have switched to a more disciplined approach to sponsorship, choosing to work with a smaller number of brands over a long-term relationship, instead of working with many brands for a short time to preserve their image with fans [154].

Companies and platforms have gradually included AI-driven solutions for the identification of fraudulent conduct and the certification of authenticity as a response to the issues that have been previously presented. There is now the possibility that models that utilize machine learning can discover discrepancies in influencer metrics. These models are shaped by a variety of factors, including engagement behavior, follower activity, and network patterns. They have the ability to recognize unusual surges in the number of followers, engagement patterns that are not genuine, and comment structures that are repetitive and robotic. Twitter/X, Instagram, and TikTok are just a few of the social media platforms that have implemented sophisticated bot detection algorithms and conducted exhaustive validations to ensure the authenticity of their followers. As a direct result of this, the impact of fake interaction on influencer rankings has been significantly diminished. In addition, it is important to remember that third-party websites such as HypeAuditor, Social Blade, and SparkToro offer a wealth of information on the credibility of impactful individuals. The ability to make more informed, data-driven judgments is facilitated for organizations when they are selecting their partners [155].

5. Social Media Algorithms and Their Impact on Information Spread

The empirical insights presented here are not merely statistical validations; rather, they represent key narrative turning points in the evolving theoretical understanding of networked information diffusion. Each finding provides compelling evidence that resolves critical tensions in the literature regarding how AI-driven analytics, influencer networks, and algorithmic amplification collectively shape consumer behavior in ways previously undocumented. This narrative approach directly addresses calls for marketing research to move beyond intuitive correlations toward genuinely novel theoretical insights [1].

5.1. How Recommendation Algorithms Work: Facebook, Twitter/X, TikTok, Instagram

Recommendation algorithms increasingly dominate the spread of content in social networks, meaning that users’ reading, interaction, and content-sharing are influenced by these algorithms. It is not just organic either. Examples of contemporary social media networks that employ AI-driven algorithms to prioritize and customize content for every user are Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, and TikTok [156]. This contrasts with early social media sites that used chronological feeds to decide what material was seen. These recommendation systems evaluate and filter data using machine learning techniques, user behavior analysis, and engagement prediction models. They are therefore able to predict which content will go viral and which will be ignored. These algorithms play an important role in digital communication because they have a significant impact on public opinion, the spread of information, and the efficacy of marketing [157].

The Idea of engagement optimization is the core of social media recommendation algorithms. These algorithms analyze thousands of data points per user, including historical interactions, content preferences, time spent on the content, social relationships, and possible emotional responses to create very specific content recommendations for each user. The purpose of this approach is to increase user retention and interaction on the platform, so that more time is spent in consuming and interacting with the content [158]. This approach is effective in its application as it helps people find interesting and relevant content, but at the same time, it has the potential to reinforce incorrect beliefs and prevent people from engaging with contrasting viewpoints. Each social media platform has its own algorithmic strategy, which is tailored to the type of users and the kind of content used on the platform. For example, Facebook’s Feed Algorithm uses a system called Meta’s Machine Learning Ranking (MLR) to display content based on four primary factors: inventory: posts from connections and followed pages; signals: user behavior and post attributes; predictions: the probability of engagement; and relevance score: the final ranking [159]. This system ensures that users are shown posts that are most likely to interest them, even if they are from pages that the user does not follow or is not even friends with. It has also been observed that Facebook’s algorithm has a high bias towards the platform’s native video content, since videos are known to increase user engagement and time spent on the platform, as opposed to other forms of content. Likewise, Twitter/X’s ‘For You’ algorithm works in two stages to first identify potential tweets from a large number of new posts and then rank them according to their probability of user engagement. Unlike Facebook, which focuses on personal connections, Twitter/X prioritizes real-time relevance, using graph-based AI models to assess tweet popularity, virality potential, and sentiment trends. Twitter also incorporates network interactions, meaning that if multiple users in a person’s network engage with a particular tweet, that tweet is more likely to be surfaced on their feed. This creates a social amplification effect, where trending topics rapidly gain visibility even among users with no direct connection to the original poster [160].

However, no platform has revolutionized recommendation algorithms as significantly as TikTok. Unlike traditional social media, where user feeds are largely influenced by friends and followers, TikTok’s “For You Page” (FYP) algorithm is based on a content-first, user-second approach. This means that any video, regardless of the creator’s follower count, has the potential to go viral if it meets engagement and watch-time thresholds. TikTok’s algorithm operates on a multi-layered ranking system that prioritizes: (1) watch time (how long a user watches a video before scrolling away), (2) completion rate (whether the user watches the entire video), (3) re-watches (if the user watches the video multiple times), and (4) engagement actions (likes, comments, shares, and saves) [161]. The platform also employs computer vision and NLP (natural language processing) to analyze video content, text captions, and sounds, ensuring that users receive videos that align with not just their past engagement but also their evolving interests. This dynamic, AI-driven personalization is why TikTok content has such high virality potential compared to other platforms. Instagram’s recommendation system, particularly in its Reels and Explore features, operates on a similar principle but incorporates cross-platform engagement signals. Unlike TikTok, which relies almost entirely on short-form video analytics, Instagram integrates a user’s historical activity across Stories, Posts, IGTV, and even Direct Messages to fine-tune its recommendations. For instance, if a user frequently engages with fitness content in Stories, Instagram’s Explore page will prioritize new fitness-related posts and Reels from accounts they have not yet followed. The Reels algorithm, much like TikTok’s FYP, emphasizes video completion rate, looping behavior, and interaction depth, ensuring that highly engaging content is repeatedly surfaced to wider audiences [162].

One of the most controversial aspects of these recommendation algorithms is their potential to amplify misinformation, sensationalism, and polarized content. Several studies have demonstrated that emotionally charged, anger-inducing material typically receives more user interaction, which causes algorithms to give polarizing subjects greater priority over objective, fact-based conversations [163]. This phenomenon has been seen on several sites and platforms where algorithms unintentionally perpetuate echo chambers by always suggesting ideologically similar material, therefore reducing users’ exposure to different points of view. Moreover, clickbait strategies and interaction farming—where content authors maximize postings specifically to trigger algorithmic promotion—have resulted in the explosion of low-quality, false, and exaggerated material in viral trends and news. Platforms have developed AI-driven content moderation systems to try to find and eliminate misleading, dangerous, or rule-violating material before it gains traction in order to offset these bad consequences. While Twitter/X has experimented with community-driven fact-checking programs to offer further background to trending postings, Facebook and Instagram deploy context-aware AI algorithms that examine the credibility of news stories and flag suspect content. Though its opaque algorithmic moderation rules have sparked questions regarding censorship and content suppression biases, TikTok has instituted automated downranking algorithms for material labeled as harmful or deceptive [164].

Companies and content providers trying to maximize reach and interaction depend on understanding these recommendation systems. Unlike traditional digital marketing, which relied on paid ads and SEO optimization, success in the era of algorithmic feeds requires the creation of content that complies with platform-specific ranking criteria [165]. For instance, although a large follower count increases visibility on Instagram, it has less impact on TikTok’s viral capability, where video completion rates and re-watchability are considerably more important. This means that businesses and marketers must regularly adapt their content strategy and use Big Data to match the evolving recommendation engine criteria of every single platform. Social media algorithms are increasingly adopting predictive modeling, whereby artificial intelligence anticipates not just users’ present preferences but also their future participation inclinations as they develop in complexity. Reinforcement learning methods are being used on platforms whereby computers dynamically change content distribution depending on real-time user response. This shift marks a path towards totally adaptable, behavior-driven content ecosystems in which every user’s experience is clearly tailored in real time depending on their psychological engagement patterns, interaction history, and latent interests [166].

5.2. Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles—Their Effect on Virality

The development of algorithms for social media channels has fundamentally changed the way knowledge is shared. This change has caused people to be less exposed to opposing points of view, while still more content supports their previous ideas. Two important occurrences, resulting from the algorithmic curation techniques applied here, are echo chambers and filter bubbles. Both of these traits help to explain the selective amplification of information, the polarization of online discourse, and the higher probability of extreme or emotionally charged material becoming viral. These strategies raise questions about intellectual isolation, the reinforcement of false information, and the loss of fair public debate, even if they have great potential to increase user involvement by providing highly relevant material [167].

An echo chamber is a situation in which people are constantly presented with information that supports their previous perceptions, because they hang out with people like them and watch channels that agree with them. In social media platforms, however, such echo chambers are not simply a result of coincidence but are rather encouraged by the algorithmic ranking systems, which dictate the kind of content that is presented to the users based on their previous interactions, interests, and friendships [168]. This creates a feedback loop where people are less likely to engage with information that goes against their beliefs, often dismissing opposing viewpoints as unreliable or biased. The end result is a digital polarization where different ideological segments receive fundamentally different sets of facts and, hence, it becomes hard to achieve consensus or to have a reasonable debate. It has been established that users who are politically active on platforms such as Twitter/X and Facebook prefer to engage with content that is consistent with their political views, thus creating separate information bubbles that hardly intersect with each other [169].

Closely associated with echo chambers is the idea of the filter bubble, first used by [170] to characterize the individual, algorithmically controlled world each user encounters online. Filter bubbles, unlike echo chambers—which are mostly driven socially—are the outcome of automated content filtering systems that customize a user’s feed, depending on interaction history, search behaviors, and predicted interests. AI-driven personalizing algorithms used by sites as Google, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube continually improve content suggestions to enhance user retention and interaction. This strategy guarantees that users view highly relevant information for their interests, but it also results in a narrowing effect wherein people are less likely to come across different points of view, surprising discoveries, or material beyond their current interests [171]. This results over time a self-contained digital environment in which consumers filter out dissident voices or surprising content while receiving an increasingly homogeneous stream of information, hence reinforcing previous viewpoints [172].

The echo chambers and filter bubbles are a combination that greatly influences the virality dynamics on social media platforms. Algorithms work on the basis of engagement and, hence, posts that are able to generate a large number of reactions from the users are given preference. Studies have also revealed that the content that is created to evoke anger, outrage, or fear is likely to receive high levels of engagement because comment, share, and reaction rates are high for such emotions. This is especially the case in a filter bubble environment where emotionally charged or ideologically similar content is shown more frequently than the more balanced or factual content, which has a hard time breaking through the algorithmic barriers [173]. This is particularly visible in the political and social issue debates where sensationalized headlines, misleading narratives, and divisive rhetoric take center stage and defeat well-reasoned analysis and moderate perspectives [174].

A major problem resulting from these processes is the spread of false information and conspiracy theories, which flourish in closed, highly involved societies where outside fact-checking is either nonexistent or deliberately rejected. It is quite difficult to rectify or offset false information that finds its echo chamber repeated, reinforced, and approved by community members [175]. The algorithmic inclination for engagement-driven content ranking aggravates this problem even more as incorrect information triggering emotional reactions—such as fear, wrath, or moral indignation—spreads more quickly than accurate corrections, which frequently receive less interaction. Studies analyzing Facebook and YouTube recommendation systems have found that users who engage with conspiratorial or extremist content are typically driven down a rabbit hole of increasingly radical recommendations, so reinforcing ideological extremity through repeated exposure to reinforce narratives [176]. In spite of the fact that there are many who believe that echo chambers and filter bubbles may improve the user experience and strengthen close connections, there are others who believe that these systems are adverse outcomes of algorithmic curation. The ability to deeply engage with issues of interest inside specialized organizations, such as communities of hobbyists, professional networks, or support groups, is made possible by personalized content filtering. This, in turn, improves the communication and information exchange that takes place within these organizations. When it comes to ensuring that users are exposed to different viewpoints and surprising discoveries, rather than being stuck in a content loop that is self-reinforcing and limited, the problem lies in finding a balance between the diversity of information and the customization of that information [177].

As a countermeasure to concerns regarding the negative impact that algorithmic filtering has on society, many platforms have introduced methods to reduce polarization and foster variety in information, with the intention of addressing the concerns discussed in the above sections. For instance, Facebook has altered the ordering of its news feed in order to give precedence to “meaningful interactions” rather than passive engagement statistics. Additionally, Twitter/X has experimented with “algorithmic transparency” efforts, which allow users to adjust their choices for content ranking [178]. Google Search and YouTube have both implemented similar ranking modifications, which promote authoritative content on topics such as politics, science, and health while downgrading sites with low authority. These changes have already been implemented. However, these interventions are still up for debate since there are many who argue that algorithmic adjustments to content ranking run the risk of imposing prejudice or censorship. This is especially true when platforms make choices that are vague or inconsistent regarding whether material should be repressed or given priority [179].

5.3. Paid vs. Organic Reach—Algorithmic Bias in Information Dissemination

Platforms have evolved from open, chronological feeds to algorithmically managed ecosystems that give engagement-driven content, which ranks as top priority, therefore changing the balance between sponsored and organic reach in social media. Early on in social media, the main method of information spread was organic reach—that is, the capacity of material to be viewed and disseminated without direct financial input [180]. However, as all these platforms—Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, and TikTok—have become more and more commercialized, sponsored promotion’s importance has skyrocketed, sometimes to the disadvantage of natural visibility. Consequently, we see a more stratified digital environment in which algorithmic biases favoring sponsored content and advertising expenditure accounts define content virality and audience reach instead of user involvement and content quality alone. This change affects brands, independent artists, and public dialogue, hence determining which voices are amplified and which remain hidden [179].

At the heart of this transformation is the declining effectiveness of organic reach, particularly on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, where algorithmic adjustments have progressively reduced the visibility of non-paid content. Studies have shown that between 2012 and 2022, the average organic reach of Facebook posts from brand pages dropped from over 16% to below 5%, with some estimates placing it even lower for pages with large followings [181]. This decline is not coincidental but is a direct result of algorithmic filtering mechanisms that prioritize content from personal connections, high-engagement posts, and—critically—sponsored advertisements. The rationale behind this shift is twofold: first, as social platforms become more saturated with content, algorithmic curation is necessary to prevent user feeds from becoming overwhelming; second and more significantly, reducing organic reach creates a financial incentive for brands and businesses to invest in paid promotions, thereby increasing platform revenue [182].

Algorithmic bias in favor of paid content manifests in several ways. One of the most significant is the preferential treatment of high-advertising-spend accounts, where brands and influencers who consistently invest in paid promotion are rewarded with algorithmic advantages even for their unpaid content. This phenomenon, sometimes referred to as “pay-to-play dynamics”, means that creators and businesses with larger budgets have a persistent advantage, while smaller creators or organizations without financial resources struggle to gain visibility [183]. Furthermore, platforms use the technology of audience segmentation, based on machine learning techniques, to guarantee that paid content will be displayed to users who are likely to engage according to their previous actions and presumed preferences. While this makes the optimization of advertising efforts possible, at the same time, it means that organic content that does not fit ideally with the users’ behavioral patterns will be downplayed. This algorithmic bias has critical consequences for the distribution of information and shaping of public debate, since the emphasis on paid content often distorts the identification of problems and how they are perceived [184]. Corporations, organizations, and countries that have the resources to pay for their messages to be seen will be able to set the discourse, whereas for independent reporters, new companies, or civil rights movements, depending on organic growth, it becomes harder to reach people. This was especially the case during political campaigns and major global events, when large amounts of money could be used to purchase advertising that would shape the narrative, while political posts without the budget for advertising would be pushed down in the feeds. The danger is that social media—which had been celebrated as a tool that allows small voices as well as the public’s collective voice to be heard—is becoming a platform where the only way to be seen is to pay for it [185].

The boundary between sponsored and natural reach is seriously blurred by algorithmic opacity, or the platforms’ lack of openness about the criteria used to decide content ranking. Many companies and content providers find it difficult to understand why their natural reach varies, which fuels conjecture and dissatisfaction about the claimed algorithmic bias in favor of advertising [186]. Some social media companies, notably Facebook and Instagram, have used content classification strategies such as “shadow banning”, which renders basically visible posts theoretically readable but greatly deprioritizing them in feeds. Since social media businesses’ ranking systems are opaque, users have less control or awareness of the factors determining the success or failure of certain material. Social media corporations deny that deliberate material screening is still occurring. On the other hand, it is important to recognize that paid promotion does not guarantee success and that organic virality remains possible under certain conditions. Content that aligns with engagement-optimization criteria—such as high emotional resonance, shareability, and real-time relevance—can still achieve widespread reach without financial backing. TikTok, for example, remains one of the few platforms where organic content has the potential to go viral without pre-existing audience size or paid amplification, due to its interest-based, content-first recommendation algorithm [187]. This has allowed small creators and brands to gain significant traction, sometimes rivaling or even surpassing major advertisers in visibility. However, even on TikTok, brands that invest in sponsored content and influencer partnerships often see consistent advantages in long-term reach and brand recall, reinforcing the broader industry trend that monetized content is structurally favored over unpaid organic content [188].

These findings critically advance our theoretical narrative by demonstrating that real-time AI-driven sentiment analytics significantly redefine influencer collaboration strategies. This addresses previously unresolved tensions concerning influencer authenticity versus algorithmic promotion, a paradox highlighted but inadequately explained in earlier research [1]. By uncovering the nuanced interplay between real-time emotional responses and predictive algorithmic models, these empirical results enrich theoretical perspectives on consumer engagement and provide a clearer, more insightful narrative of influencer marketing effectiveness.

6. Misinformation, Fake News, and Ethical Considerations

The empirical findings concerning misinformation, algorithmic biases, and manipulative advertising represent significant narrative inflection points that illuminate critical ethical paradoxes in contemporary interactive marketing theory. Rather than merely reporting ethical issues, this analysis narratively resolves tensions between marketing effectiveness and ethical practice by demonstrating how advanced predictive models, while enhancing consumer engagement, simultaneously heighten ethical dilemmas that marketers and policymakers must navigate [1].

6.1. The Role of Misinformation in Viral Marketing—Deepfakes and False Endorsements

The rapid evolution of social media algorithms, AI-driven content generation, and digital marketing strategies has given rise to an era where misinformation can be weaponized for commercial, political, and ideological purposes. Viral marketing, once seen as an organic and user-driven process, is increasingly vulnerable to manipulative tactics that exploit public trust, cognitive biases, and the algorithmic prioritization of engagement-driven content [189]. Among the most concerning developments in this space are deepfake technology and false endorsements, both of which have significantly altered the landscape of digital persuasion, brand credibility, and consumer trust. By leveraging AI-generated imagery, voice synthesis, and fabricated testimonials, bad actors can create highly realistic but entirely false marketing materials, leading to widespread misinformation, ethical dilemmas, and severe reputational risks for individuals, brands, and even entire industries [190].

Deepfakes and Their Impact on Viral Marketing

Deepfake technology, which uses advanced machine learning models such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to create hyper-realistic fake images, videos, and audio, has become a powerful tool for deceptive marketing and misinformation campaigns. Originally developed for entertainment and AI research, deepfake technology has rapidly been adapted for fraudulent and manipulative marketing practices, allowing unauthorized digital impersonations of celebrities, influencers, and industry leaders [191]. The capacity to adeptly alter facial expressions, vocal intonations, and physical gestures allows deepfake videos to misleadingly portray public figures as endorsing various products, services, or political beliefs without their approval. This type of synthetic media demonstrates notable efficacy in viral marketing, given that social media algorithms favor captivating video content and individuals tend to place greater trust in visual and auditory evidence compared to textual assertions. One of the most concerning facets of misinformation propelled by deepfakes is their capacity to circumvent conventional credibility assessments [192]. Historically, consumers have depended on visual evidence and video testimonials as markers of authenticity; however, the advent of deepfake technology undermines the trustworthiness of audiovisual media, rendering it progressively challenging to differentiate between genuine endorsements and AI-generated forgeries. For instance, a deepfake video showcasing a prominent influencer or business leader endorsing a product can elicit significant engagement and consumer interest, despite the fact that the individual in question had no participation in the campaign. Once such content gains viral momentum, fact-checking efforts often arrive too late, as social media algorithms prioritize engagement-driven ranking over content verification, allowing false narratives to spread rapidly before corrective measures can be implemented [193].

Several high-profile incidents have already demonstrated the dangers of deepfake marketing. In one case, deepfake videos falsely depicted celebrities endorsing cryptocurrency scams, misleading thousands of investors who assumed the endorsements were legitimate. Similarly, deepfake-generated political endorsements and fabricated speeches have been used to manipulate public opinion, raising concerns about the erosion of trust in digital media and the difficulty of distinguishing between genuine advocacy and AI-generated propaganda [194]. Recent studies have also highlighted growing ethical concerns surrounding AI-driven interactive marketing. Labrecque et al. [195] particularly emphasize how algorithmic manipulation, data privacy breaches, and deepfakes can significantly erode consumer trust. They argue that the inherent realism and persuasive power of deepfakes not only compromise public trust in digital media but also pose substantial ethical and societal risks, particularly in scenarios involving misinformation, targeted cyberbullying, and financial scams. Moreover, vulnerable groups with lower digital literacy are increasingly susceptible to exploitation through sophisticated AI-generated content. As deepfake technology becomes more accessible and user-friendly, the risk of fraudulent marketing campaigns, unauthorized brand associations, and manipulated consumer behavior will continue to grow, posing a significant challenge to the integrity of digital marketing and public discourse [196].

False Endorsements, Fabricated Testimonials, and Their Ethical Implications

Beyond deepfake manipulation, another widespread misinformation tactic in viral marketing involves false endorsements and fabricated testimonials, where brands or deceptive actors falsely associate influential figures with their products to gain consumer trust. While misleading marketing tactics have existed for decades, the rise of influencer culture and AI-generated content has dramatically expanded the scale and effectiveness of these strategies, making it easier than ever to create highly convincing but entirely false promotional content [197]. One of the most common forms of false endorsements involves AI-generated influencer marketing, where companies use deep learning algorithms to create synthetic influencers or generate fake reviews and testimonials that appear authentic. AI-powered bots can now simulate human-like comment sections, customer reviews, and product ratings, artificially inflating the perceived popularity and credibility of a product. This tactic is particularly effective on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, where users rely heavily on peer reviews, influencer recommendations, and social proof when making purchasing decisions. A product with thousands of fake positive reviews or an AI-generated influencer seemingly promoting a brand can manipulate consumer perceptions, leading to misinformed purchasing behavior based on entirely fabricated endorsements [198].

In some cases, legitimate brands have inadvertently fallen victim to false endorsements, where unauthorized third parties create fake ads featuring well-known figures without their knowledge or consent [199]. This was evident in multiple cases where celebrities such as Tom Hanks, Elon Musk, and Oprah Winfrey were falsely depicted endorsing investment schemes, skincare products, or cryptocurrency ventures. Once these deceptive campaigns gain viral traction, the damage to consumer trust is often irreversible, even if the misleading content is later debunked. The ability of AI-generated misinformation to erode public confidence in legitimate endorsements and brand credibility presents a serious ethical challenge for the marketing industry, as consumers become increasingly skeptical of influencer partnerships, celebrity endorsements, and digital advertisements [200].

Algorithmic Amplification and the Spread of Misinformation in Marketing

One of the key reasons misinformation-driven marketing tactics are so effective is the algorithmic bias that governs content visibility and virality on social media platforms. Social media algorithms are not designed to assess truthfulness but are instead optimized for engagement, meaning that sensational, emotionally charged, and visually striking content—including deepfake endorsements and false testimonials—tends to outperform factual, neutral, or less emotionally stimulating content [201]. As a result, misleading marketing campaigns often experience disproportionate algorithmic amplification, reaching massive audiences before fact-checkers, regulators, or platform moderators can intervene. This engagement-first ranking system creates perverse incentives for unethical marketers to exploit viral misinformation tactics, knowing that the faster and wider their false endorsements spread, the harder it will be to counteract the narrative once it has taken hold. Unlike traditional advertising, where brands are subject to regulatory oversight and legal accountability, social media marketing operates in a gray zone where AI-generated influencers, deepfake advertisements, and fake customer reviews can spread unchecked, creating false consumer perceptions that are difficult to correct even after exposure. The challenge for platforms lies in striking a balance between free expression, viral content optimization, and ethical content governance, ensuring that manipulative marketing tactics do not exploit algorithmic biases to mislead consumers [202].

The Need for Ethical AI and Regulatory Frameworks

As AI-driven misinformation continues to redefine viral marketing, there is a clear need for stronger ethical frameworks and regulatory measures to prevent the misuse of deepfake technology, false endorsements, and deceptive advertising [203]. Some potential solutions are new forms of digital authentication, AI-based content verification tools, and more stringent platform rules that demand real-time identification and labelling of synthetic media. While Meta, Google, and TikTok have started using automated deepfake detection techniques, the technologies are not foolproof and are being circumvented, thus needing further enhancement to keep up with the evolving AI generation models. Technological solutions are also expected to be complemented by legal solutions that will set legal boundaries for the use of AI marketing content. The European Union and the United States are already looking at regulations that could hold platforms and advertisers accountable for the spread of false, AI-enabled content, including possible fines on companies that intentionally use deepfake endorsements or synthetic influencer campaigns without revealing them. If implemented properly, these measures, along with consumer education and media literacy campaigns, may be able to lessen the future consequences of AI-generated misinformation in the digital marketing environment [204].

6.2. Fighting Misinformation—Fact-Checking, AI Detection, and Regulatory Approaches

Fighting false information, as it keeps proliferating on digital channels at an unheard-of rate, calls for a multifarious approach combining technical solutions, legislative actions, and user-driven awareness campaigns [205]. Social media algorithms that give interaction top priority above truth allow sensational, deceptive, and emotionally charged material to travel quicker and further than factual reporting, hence driving the virality of incorrect information. Given this fact, attempts to reduce false information must be proactive rather than reactive, incorporating real-time detection technologies, strong verification processes, and explicit regulatory frameworks that hold platforms accountable for the material they magnify. Although government rules, AI-driven detection tools, and fact-checking organizations all help to address the problem, each method has major ethical questions and limitations. Therefore, misinformation is always changing and calls for constant adaptation and awareness [206].

One of the primary methods of combating misinformation is through fact-checking organizations and initiatives, which work to verify claims, debunk false narratives, and provide accurate context to misleading information. Independent fact-checking groups such as Snopes, PolitiFact, and the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) have established themselves as key players in countering falsehoods, particularly in areas like political misinformation, health-related myths, and viral hoaxes. These organizations rely on human expertise, investigative journalism, and open-source intelligence (OSINT) techniques to verify statements, cross-reference sources, and provide evidence-based corrections [207]. However, fact-checking has inherent limitations, primarily due to the speed at which misinformation spreads compared to the time it takes to debunk it. By the time a misleading claim has been fact-checked and refuted, it has often already reached millions of users, been reshared across multiple platforms, and become embedded in public discourse. Psychological studies on the “continued influence effect” show that even when misinformation is later corrected, people often retain elements of the original falsehood, especially if it aligns with their existing beliefs. This makes fact-checking a necessary but insufficient solution on its own, as debunking alone cannot fully reverse the impact of a viral falsehood [208].

Recognizing the limitations of traditional fact-checking, AI-powered misinformation detection systems have emerged as a critical tool in the fight against fake news. Machine learning models trained on natural language processing (NLP), network analysis, and pattern recognition can analyze massive datasets in real-time, identifying misinformation before it gains widespread traction [209]. AI-based systems such as Google’s Jigsaw, Facebook’s AI-powered content moderation, and Twitter/X’s Birdwatch initiative use deep learning models to detect linguistic markers of misinformation, analyze the credibility of sources, and flag suspicious content for human review. These systems can identify hallmarks of false information, such as emotionally charged language, unusual engagement spikes, and bot-driven amplification, allowing platforms to take pre-emptive action before misleading content spreads uncontrollably [210]. Additionally, AI models can track coordinated disinformation campaigns, mapping how false narratives propagate through networks of inauthentic accounts, troll farms, and state-sponsored influence operations. This capability has been particularly useful in detecting election-related misinformation, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, and manipulated media such as deepfakes, where AI-generated content blurs the line between reality and fabrication [211].

Although AI-driven detection has several benefits, no automated system is entirely perfect. Errors include false positives, contextual misreading, and hostile manipulation by artificial intelligence, thereby impairing the dependability of these tools. To hide themselves, malicious players are using sophisticated techniques such as coded language, satire-based dishonesty, and the abuse of “gray areas” [212]. These strategies make use of deceptive but not totally false data. Malicious actors are spreading false information using more advanced techniques to hide from discovery. Furthermore, the presence of bias in the data used for training artificial intelligence might result in inadvertent censorship—that is, false reporting or restriction of appropriate content. This raises concerns not just about the right to freedom of speech but also about the tendency of automatic moderation systems to go beyond what is considered acceptable. In light of these issues, it is necessary to incorporate human supervision into the detection process of artificial intelligence. As a result, interventions to combat disinformation will be guaranteed to be accurate, objective, and responsive to the environment in which they are carried out [213]. This will ensure that they are not solely dependent on algorithmic decision-making.

With countries and international entities striving to create legal frameworks that hold platforms accountable for the dissemination of damaging content, regulatory responses to disinformation have become the central focus of global policy debates. The Digital Services Act (DSA) of the European Union and the Communications Decency Act (CDA) discussions in the United States show the rising force toward governmental action in platform responsibility [214]. While debate on reforming Communications Decency Act (CDA) in the United States centers on the degree to which platforms should be held liable for the content they host, the DSA, for example, mandates that tech companies apply stronger transparency measures, misinformation detection systems, and user reporting systems. Similar regulations and laws mandating social media sites to delete inaccurate or damaging information within certain periods, with fines for non-compliance, have been adopted by various nations, including Germany and Australia. Nevertheless, strict rules run the danger of allowing government overreach, censorship, and the repression of dissenting viewpoints; thus, regulating efforts must carefully negotiate the thin line between misinformation control and freedom of expression [215]. The difficulty is separating damaging, false information that compromises public safety from honest discourse that includes unpopular or contentious opinions. Authoritarian governments have previously shown the possible risks of poorly defined or politically driven misinformation rules by using “anti-misinformation” measures to stifle critics and quell opposition. Furthermore, implementing global rules against misleading content is rather challenging, as platforms traverse several countries with different legal rules [216].

Knowing the complexities of the problem, a hybrid model that combines fact-checking, AI detection, and regulatory oversight seems to be the most feasible way of tackling misinformation on a large scale. It is therefore important that platforms increase algorithmic transparency, so that users are able to understand the reasoning as to why particular content is highlighted or indicated, as well as continuing to support better misinformation literacy initiatives that assist people in being able to better critique the information that they come across on the internet. Thus, the role of tech companies, independent fact-checkers, and governmental agencies will be the key factor in creating strong, flexible misinformation mitigation systems that can be adapted to new threats as they appear [217].

6.3. Ethical Concerns in Viral Marketing—Manipulation and Deceptive Advertising

Viral marketing, when executed ethically, has the potential to create engaging, entertaining, and informative brand experiences that resonate with audiences. However, in an era where social media algorithms, AI-generated content, and behavioral psychology are increasingly leveraged to optimize engagement, ethical concerns surrounding manipulation and deceptive advertising have become more pressing than ever [218]. The core issue lies in how brands, advertisers, and content creators strategically exploit cognitive biases, emotional triggers, and algorithmic amplification to influence consumer behavior, often without full transparency. While some degree of persuasion is inherent in all advertising, the line between persuasion and manipulation becomes blurred when brands prioritize viral success over ethical responsibility, engaging in tactics that mislead, deceive, or pressure consumers into making choices they might not otherwise make [219].

One of the most prevalent ethical concerns in viral marketing is the use of manipulative psychological tactics to drive engagement and conversions. Techniques such as fear-based messaging, scarcity marketing, and urgency-driven calls to action are commonly used to create a sense of panic, time pressure, or fear of missing out (FOMO), all of which can lead consumers to make impulsive decisions based on emotional rather than rational thinking [220]. E-commerce platforms frequently use countdown timers, “limited stock” warnings, and flash sales to create artificial urgency, even when there is no real scarcity of a product. Similarly, some viral marketing campaigns rely on negativity bias and outrage marketing, intentionally provoking emotional reactions to increase content virality and brand exposure. Research in behavioral economics has shown that people are more likely to engage with content that triggers strong emotions, particularly anger, fear, or surprise, making these tactics highly effective but ethically questionable [221].

Viral marketing also employs another deceptive strategy called amplification or wholesale fabrication of product claims, meant to excite and interest consumers. This is especially troubling in sectors such as health and wellness, cosmetics, and financial services, where making false claims may have major consequences in the actual world [222]. Companies that sell nutritional supplements, cosmetics, or investment opportunities often rely on inflated claims, well-chosen testimonials, and pseudoscience-based language in order to support the supposed efficacy or validity of their products. These false assertions are often shared before authorities or fact-checking organizations have the chance to step in, therefore spreading a lot of false information and potentially having negative effects on consumers regarding their money or health. Influencer sponsorships that omitted clear health risks drove the divisive “detox tea” trend on Instagram and TikTok. This phenomenon caused consumer indignation and a legal investigation into the topic. In order to support the legitimacy of dubious products, several companies have also used AI-generated influencer advertising, fake scientific studies, and manufactured customer testimonials; hence, consumers find it difficult to tell real from deceptive endorsements [223].

A growing ethical concern in viral marketing is the rise of deceptive influencer partnerships, where influencers fail to disclose paid sponsorships, affiliate commissions, or brand relationships while promoting products or services. Social media influencers have become powerful drivers of consumer behavior, often perceived as authentic, relatable voices compared to traditional celebrity endorsements [224]. However, when influencers engage in undisclosed advertising, they violate consumer trust by presenting paid promotions as genuine personal recommendations, misleading their followers into believing the endorsement is based on personal experience rather than financial incentive. Regulatory agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the U.S. and the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the U.K. have introduced stricter guidelines requiring influencers to clearly disclose sponsored content, yet enforcement remains inconsistent. Many influencers continue to exploit loopholes, vague disclosures, or hidden sponsorships, particularly on platforms where ephemeral content (e.g., Instagram Stories, Snapchat, TikTok live streams) makes enforcement more challenging [225].

Algorithmic manipulation is another major ethical issue in viral marketing, as brands increasingly tailor their content strategies to exploit social media ranking algorithms in ways that prioritize visibility over truthfulness. Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube reward high-engagement content with greater reach, leading brands and creators to optimize for algorithmic success rather than ethical advertising standards. This has resulted in the rise of clickbait tactics, engagement farming, and misleading thumbnails or titles that entice users into clicking on content under false pretenses [226]. A common example is YouTube’s use of exaggerated reaction thumbnails and misleading video titles, which are designed to generate high click-through rates even if the content itself does not deliver on its promises. On social commerce platforms, advertisers frequently use AI-generated product demonstrations, heavily edited videos, or paid engagement tactics (such as fake likes, comments, and reviews) to manipulate social proof, creating the illusion of widespread popularity and consumer demand [227].

The ethical implications of these manipulative marketing strategies are not just that they mislead consumers, they also lead to other social problems, such as the spread of misinformation or fake news, negative impacts on mental health, and the degradation of people’s trust in digital communication. In a digital environment where companies compete for people’s attention, in a setting that is increasingly crowded with content, virality is often the only goal that brands are willing to achieve through ethically questionable means. This not only creates a bad environment for consumers to navigate through a number of deceptive advertising measures but also erodes the credibility of the digital marketing efforts that are sincere, which makes it difficult for brands that refrain from using manipulative techniques to distinguish themselves from those that do [228]. These collective efforts are important to address the ethical concerns and to set clearer guidelines and accountability measures with the collaborative work of regulatory agencies, social media platforms, and digital marketers. More specific measures are required to prevent false advertising, ensure influencer disclosure, and promote algorithmic equality to ensure that consumers are receiving truthful and accurate information in the online market. In particular, social media platforms are expected to disclose more information about the methods used in ranking content, so that deceptive content is not given undue weight through the use of algorithms. Some of these measures include fact-checking partnerships, downranking of misleading content, and stronger ad review processes, but their implementation is partial and not very effective. Ethical advertising certification initiatives could also be useful in helping consumers to be more skeptical of marketing communications in order to prevent advertisers from taking advantage of them [229].

7. Emerging Trends in Network and Viral Marketing

7.1. Short-Form Video Virality—The Rise of TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts

Short-form video content has rapidly become the dominant force in network and viral marketing, fundamentally altering how brands, influencers, and creators engage with audiences [230]. Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts have pioneered a shift in content consumption patterns, where quick, visually engaging, and algorithmically optimized videos outperform traditional long-form content in terms of reach, engagement, and shareability. The appeal of short-form video lies in its high retention rates, mobile-first design, and ability to quickly capture user attention, making it the preferred medium for viral marketing campaigns, influencer promotions, and organic content discovery. Empirical evidence further supports the notion that specific content characteristics significantly influence early engagement and virality, particularly in short-form video ecosystems. Zhang and Li [231] demonstrated that emotional appeal, informativeness, and entertainment value are critical determinants of whether a short video will achieve rapid initial traction and algorithmic amplification on platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts. Their findings highlight the importance of strategically optimizing emotional resonance and informational richness in content design to maximize early-stage visibility and audience engagement. As these platforms continue to evolve, businesses and content creators must adapt their strategies to leverage algorithmic advantages, optimize audience engagement, and create compelling, shareable narratives within an increasingly competitive digital landscape [232].

One of the key reasons short-form videos have achieved unparalleled virality is their algorithm-driven content discovery systems, which operate fundamentally differently from traditional social media feeds. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts use AI-powered recommendation engines that prioritize engagement metrics such as watch time, video completion rate, replays, and interaction depth (likes, shares, comments, and saves) rather than follower count or pre-established audience reach. This means that even new creators with zero followers have the potential to go viral if their content meets the platform’s engagement optimization criteria. TikTok’s For You Page (FYP), for instance, personalizes content feeds based on real-time user behavior, ensuring that videos are surfaced to the right audiences based on viewing preferences, engagement history, and trending content categories. This democratized distribution model has led to an explosion of creator-driven virality, where relatable, entertaining, or highly engaging videos spread organically without requiring significant advertising budgets [233].

Pointing to the popularity of trending music, challenges, and remixable content types helps to explain the virality of short-form video content. These kinds of content inspire public involvement and group creation of materials. Unlike conventional video marketing, in which companies have more control over the plot, user-generated content (UGC) helps trends on short-form platforms evolve. Common challenges, dance events, and meme structures, for instance, help to build a self-sustaining viral cycle. This loop motivates people to reinterpret and enhance current trends, hence extending the lifetime of material gone viral. Thanks to TikTok’s massive music library and remixing powers, a community of individuals cooperating to distribute viral material has grown exponentially there. These tools let users create duet videos, recycle audio recordings, and combine fresh material. Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts can create viral trends by the use of remix tools and artificial intelligence trend analysis [234]. The virality of short-form films has changed brand marketing techniques, and companies have been compelled to embrace new engagement models emphasizing entertainment instead of advertising. Slick television commercials or planned influencer campaigns are among the conventional means of corporate marketing that have lost relevance on platforms stressing authenticity, spontaneity, and audience participation accordingly. Short-form video—which may incorporate story, comedy, relatability, and engagement—has the ability to become viral for all kinds of companies. Many great viral advertisements employ behind-the-scenes film, real, unaltered quotes, and a storyline created by influencers instead of commercial videos with high production value but which lack personalization. Businesses may readily include their marketing message into aesthetically pleasing video forms by offering information that is both interesting and appealing, therefore improving the degree of engagement with what is now called “edutainment”—a mix of both education and entertainment [235].

Another breakthrough that has started altering how businesses create and distribute viral content is the growing usage of not only AI-generated content but also synthetic influencers in short-form video marketing. Thanks to AI-powered video-editing tools, deepfake-driven virtual influencers, and algorithmically optimized narrative techniques, companies can now increase content creation at immense rates while keeping platform-optimal engagement metrics. YouTube Shorts, for example, have developed automatic content repurposing technologies that let creators extract intriguing bits from long-form videos and edit them for short-form distribution, thereby maximizing reach across several formats [236]. TikTok’s AI-powered video recommendation and ad-placement algorithms, which let companies automatically test many content versions and maximize for best audience engagement and conversion rates, have helped to simplify performance-based marketing even further. These AI-enhanced solutions are not only changing the way marketing campaigns are executed but also rethinking what qualifies as “authentic” viral content in a world where algorithmic curation has become increasingly significant [237].

Despite the immense success of short-form video marketing, it also presents ethical and strategic challenges, particularly in terms of content saturation, declining attention spans, and the monetization of virality. The rapid, high-volume nature of short-form content has led to a competitive environment where trends rise and fall within days, if not hours, making it difficult for brands to maintain long-term engagement without constant content production. Moreover, the short attention span of users—reinforced by fast-paced, dopamine-driven content consumption—has raised concerns about the declining effectiveness of traditional storytelling and in-depth brand messaging. Platforms have attempted to mitigate these concerns by introducing monetization programs, creator funds, and brand-partnered sponsorships, yet the challenge remains in sustaining long-term audience loyalty in an ecosystem designed for ephemeral content consumption [238].

7.2. Decentralized Social Networks and Web3 Marketing—A Shift Toward User Control and Digital Ownership

The rise of decentralized social networks and Web3 marketing is an evolutionary as well as revolutionary change in the way of information propagation, content ownership, and brand relations with digital communities [239]. Unlike conventional social media platforms, which are controlled by large corporations like Meta (Facebook), Google (YouTube), and TikTok, the algorithm, data ownership, and monetization mechanisms of these platforms are different from Web3-based social networks which are based on blockchain technology to ensure decentralization, user ownership of data, and tokenization. This transformation is not only a technical change but also a cultural one that defines how people work with digital content, how trust is created by brands, and how network marketing strategies are developed, for a world with decreased centralization and increased transparency [240]. Decentralized social networks are characterized by the shift from corporate control of data storage to the user’s control of digital identities and communities. Some of the platforms include Mastodon, Farcaster, Lens Protocol, and Bluesky, which are federated or based on blockchain, meaning that users own their accounts, content, and interactions, not a single entity. This is a direct contrast with Web2 platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, and YouTube, where companies centralize the control of content, monetization, and data management. In Web3 social networks, it is not only that users are not the product, but they become the governors of the platforms, the data, and the new economic models that arise, which is a completely new approach to sharing content and viral marketing [241].

From a marketing perspective, Web3 social networks challenge traditional engagement models by prioritizing community-driven influence, tokenized incentives, and decentralized content curation. In contrast to Web2’s engagement algorithms, which optimize for advertising revenue and user retention, Web3 marketing strategies revolve around direct creator-to-user relationships, NFT-based content ownership, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) that empower communities to co-create brand experiences [242]. The shift toward token-based economies allows for new monetization models, where users and content creators are rewarded with cryptographic assets (tokens, NFTs, or cryptocurrency) for their contributions. For instance, platforms like Lens Protocol and Rally.io enable creators to issue their own social tokens, allowing followers to financially support influencers and gain exclusive access to premium content, community memberships, or governance rights. This model shifts the dynamic from platform-controlled monetization to user-driven value exchange, providing greater financial independence for creators while fostering deeper audience loyalty [243].

Another critical aspect of Web3 marketing is the emergence of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) as a marketing and engagement tool. Unlike traditional digital content, where ownership is platform-dependent, NFTs allow for verifiable ownership and transferability of digital assets, making them an ideal mechanism for brand loyalty programs, exclusive content access, and digital collectibles [244]. Brands like Nike (RTFKT), Adidas, and Starbucks (Odyssey NFT program) have already experimented with NFT-based consumer engagement, where customers can earn and trade branded digital assets that provide real-world rewards, event access, or limited-edition merchandise. This shift toward “ownable engagement” changes how viral marketing functions—rather than relying purely on algorithmic reach and influencer partnerships, brands can incentivize engagement through financially valuable digital assets that increase in value as their networks grow [245].

The decentralization of social media also has significant implications for algorithmic content distribution and virality. Traditional platforms operate on black-box algorithms, where engagement metrics, visibility thresholds, and content ranking are opaque and controlled by corporate interests. In contrast, Web3 social networks aim to implement open-source, community-governed ranking mechanisms, where users collectively decide how content is surfaced and prioritized [246]. This shift addresses one of the biggest criticisms of Web2 social platforms: the manipulation of content visibility for advertising revenue, where organic reach is often suppressed in favor of paid promotions. In Web3 models, virality is determined by decentralized governance mechanisms, where token-holding communities vote on trending content, reward high-value contributions, and mitigate spam or misinformation without corporate interference. This approach fosters greater transparency in information spread, potentially reducing algorithmic biases, engagement farming, and the artificial virality tactics commonly seen on centralized platforms [247].

Despite these advantages, Web3 social networks face significant challenges that impact their scalability, user adoption, and marketing viability. One of the most pressing concerns is the complexity of onboarding and mass adoption. Unlike traditional social media, where users simply create an account, Web3 platforms often require crypto wallets, blockchain knowledge, and active participation in token economies, which can create barriers to entry for mainstream users [248]. Additionally, decentralization introduces governance complexities, where community-led decision-making may lead to fragmented ecosystems, content moderation difficulties, and ideological polarization. Without centralized oversight, spam, misinformation, and low-quality content can proliferate, requiring new forms of decentralized moderation models that balance freedom of speech with content integrity. Another challenge is the uncertain regulatory environment surrounding cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and tokenized rewards, which directly impact how brands can implement Web3 marketing strategies. Governments and financial institutions are still grappling with the legal classification of digital assets, leading to concerns about taxation, securities regulations, and fraud prevention in token-based marketing. Major social media platforms like Instagram and Twitter briefly experimented with NFT integrations before scaling back due to regulatory uncertainty and fluctuating market conditions, highlighting the instability of Web3 adoption within traditional tech ecosystems [249].

The future of Web3 marketing and decentralized social networks will likely be shaped by hybrid models that combine the best aspects of decentralization with user-friendly, scalable infrastructures. The emergence of layer-2 blockchain solutions and AI-driven smart contracts could simplify user onboarding, improve content ranking mechanisms, and enhance trust in decentralized networks. Additionally, major brands and media organizations will continue experimenting with blockchain-powered loyalty programs, NFT-based engagement models, and decentralized advertising structures, bridging the gap between Web2’s user base and Web3’s innovative ownership economy [250]. This shift toward decentralized social networks and Web3 marketing represents a transformative departure from traditional, corporate-controlled digital ecosystems, offering greater user ownership, transparent content distribution, and new monetization opportunities. However, challenges related to scalability, user adoption, and regulatory uncertainty remain significant hurdles that must be addressed before widespread adoption can occur. The success of Web3 social platforms will depend on their ability to merge decentralization with usability, ensuring that brands, creators, and users can fully harness the benefits of decentralized influence and tokenized marketing without unnecessary complexity or risk. Whether Web3 marketing becomes the future standard or a niche alternative, it has already reshaped discussions around data ownership, content monetization, and the ethics of social media engagement, setting the stage for a new era of network-driven digital marketing [251].

7.3. AI and Chatbots in Viral Campaigns—Automating Engagement and Amplifying Reach

The integration of AI and chatbots into viral marketing campaigns has fundamentally reshaped how brands interact with audiences, personalize engagement, and scale content dissemination. In an era where social media virality is driven by real-time interactions, hyper-personalization, and algorithmic amplification, AI-powered systems play a crucial role in enhancing user engagement, automating responses, and driving campaign momentum at an unprecedented scale. From intelligent chatbots that simulate human-like conversations to AI-driven content generation that optimizes ad performance, the deployment of artificial intelligence in marketing is no longer a futuristic concept but a mainstream necessity for brands looking to achieve virality. As platforms like TikTok, Instagram, Twitter/X, and WhatsApp increasingly integrate AI-driven features, brands must adapt to new engagement paradigms that blend automation, predictive analytics, and conversational AI to captivate and retain audiences in highly competitive digital environments [252].

The Role of AI in Enhancing Viral Marketing Strategies

One of the most transformative aspects of AI-driven viral marketing is its ability to analyze vast amounts of user data in real-time, enabling brands to predict trends, optimize content, and tailor marketing messages for maximum impact. Traditional viral campaigns relied on manual audience segmentation and A/B testing, but modern AI models, particularly those based on deep learning and natural language processing (NLP), can instantly analyze engagement patterns and adjust content strategies dynamically [253]. For instance, AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Google’s Bard, and Meta’s Llama can generate highly contextual, platform-optimized captions, hashtags, and ad copy, ensuring that content aligns with current trends, audience sentiment, and engagement triggers. AI models also predict viral potential by analyzing historical data, social listening insights, and competitor performance, allowing brands to make data-driven decisions about content creation, influencer partnerships, and distribution channels. AI also enhances hyper-personalization, a critical factor in achieving sustained virality. AI algorithms segment users based on behavioral data, interests, and engagement history, delivering customized marketing messages that feel organic rather than generic [254]. This is particularly valuable in chatbot-driven campaigns, where AI-powered assistants engage users in real-time, conversational interactions that feel personalized and interactive. Platforms like Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram DMs now incorporate AI chatbots that can simulate human-like conversations, offering instant responses to inquiries, recommending products, and even guiding users through interactive brand experiences. Unlike traditional customer service bots that follow rigid, pre-programmed scripts, modern AI chatbots leverage NLP and sentiment analysis to adapt their responses dynamically, ensuring a more engaging and emotionally intelligent interaction [255].

Chatbots and Conversational AI as Viral Engagement Tools

AI-powered chatbots have emerged as a cornerstone of modern viral marketing campaigns, enabling brands to scale customer interactions, automate engagement, and enhance consumer retention with unprecedented efficiency. Unlike traditional marketing content, which primarily relies on one-way communication, AI chatbots facilitate real-time, two-way conversations, creating more immersive and interactive brand experiences [256]. One of their most significant advantages is their ability to leverage Big Data-driven user insights, allowing them to deliver hyper-personalized interactions and optimize automated engagement. By analyzing customer behavior, past interactions, and sentiment analysis in real time, AI chatbots can dynamically tailor responses, recommend products, and anticipate user needs, creating a highly responsive and engaging consumer journey. This integration of Big Data analytics with conversational AI enables brands to manage millions of interactions simultaneously, ensuring that each user receives a tailored experience that mimics human-like personalization while maintaining the efficiency of automation. Leading brands such as Sephora, H&M, and Nike have successfully incorporated AI-driven chatbots into platforms like Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp, where users can ask product-related questions, receive curated recommendations, and even finalize purchases without ever leaving the chat interface. This frictionless interaction streamlines the customer journey, reduces drop-off rates, and increases engagement duration, both of which enhance the virality of brand interactions on algorithm-driven platforms [257]. Additionally, AI chatbots have proven instrumental in gamified viral marketing campaigns, incorporating features such as interactive polls, trivia contests, and storytelling-driven experiences to encourage participation and organic content sharing. Campaigns that leverage AI-powered conversational challenges—such as Nike’s personalized fitness AI coach or Duolingo’s language-learning chatbot—frequently see heightened user engagement, increased retention, and widespread social amplification, reinforcing the chatbot’s role as an essential tool in digital virality [258].

AI chatbots are also revolutionizing influencer marketing, with brands increasingly deploying AI-generated virtual personalities to interact with audiences in real time. AI-driven influencers such as Lil Miquela, FN Meka, and Kuki AI have amassed massive social followings, engaging users through AI-generated social media content, chatbot-driven direct messages, and even simulated interviews, where AI-powered avatars respond to real-time questions from followers. These AI personalities leverage Big Data analytics to optimize their engagement strategies, ensuring that their interactions, tone, and content align seamlessly with trending topics, audience sentiment, and consumer behavior patterns [259]. This blurring of human and AI-driven engagement has opened new possibilities for scalable, always-on influencer marketing, where AI influencers never experience fatigue, can respond instantly to vast numbers of users, and can be fine-tuned to reinforce brand messaging with high precision. While some critics argue that AI influencers lack the authenticity and emotional connection of human creators, brands that integrate AI chatbots with traditional influencer marketing strategies can develop hybrid engagement models, combining the efficiency and scalability of automation with the credibility and relatability of human-led campaigns. As AI and Big Data-driven personalization continue to advance, chatbots are becoming indispensable tools for brands looking to create dynamic, data-driven, and highly engaging viral marketing experiences in an increasingly automated digital landscape [260].

AI-Generated Content and Predictive Analytics in Viral Campaigns

Another major impact of AI in viral marketing is its role in content creation and predictive analytics, where machine learning models optimize campaign performance in real time. AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, Jasper, and Copy.ai can generate engaging ad copy, TikTok captions, and automated scriptwriting, reducing the time and effort required to produce high-quality viral content. Similarly, AI video editing software such as RunwayML, Synthesia, and Pictory in their latest versions allows brands to create professional-looking, platform-optimized videos at scale, incorporating AI-generated animations, voiceovers, and dynamic subtitles to increase watch time and engagement [261]. AI also enhances predictive analytics, allowing brands to forecast which trends will go viral before they peak. Machine learning models analyze historical campaign data, competitor strategies, and real-time audience behavior, predicting the best times to post, optimal ad targeting strategies, and even which influencers are most likely to generate high ROI. Platforms like TikTok’s Creator Marketplace, Instagram’s Branded Content Tools, and YouTube’s AI-powered audience insights provide real-time trend forecasting, helping marketers make data-driven decisions about content format, engagement hooks, and platform distribution strategies. By leveraging AI-generated insights, brands can ensure their campaigns are not just reactive but proactively optimized for virality [262].

7.4. Neuroscience and Behavioral Targeting in Virality—The Science of Attention, Emotion, and Persuasion

As digital platforms become increasingly sophisticated in predicting and shaping user behavior, neuroscience and behavioral targeting have emerged as powerful tools in viral marketing strategies. Marketers, social media platforms, and content creators are no longer relying on guesswork to craft viral campaigns; instead, they are leveraging insights from cognitive science, emotional triggers, and subconscious decision-making processes to optimize content for maximum engagement and shareability [263]. At the heart of this shift is the understanding that virality is not random—it follows predictable patterns based on how the human brain processes information, responds to stimuli, and decides to take action. With advances in neuromarketing, biometric tracking, and AI-driven behavioral analysis, brands now have the ability to fine-tune their messaging, visuals, and storytelling techniques to align with the neural and psychological mechanisms that drive attention, memory retention, and social sharing behaviors [264].

The Neuroscience of Virality—How the Brain Engages with Content

At its core, virality is a function of human psychology, particularly in the way the brain processes emotion, surprise, social validation, and cognitive ease. Neuromarketing research has shown that content that triggers strong emotional responses—whether joy, awe, excitement, fear, or outrage—is significantly more likely to be shared. This aligns with findings in affective neuroscience, which demonstrate that the amygdala (the brain’s emotional processing center) plays a critical role in decision-making and memory formation [265]. Content that evokes high-arousal emotions (e.g., excitement, anger, or humor) tends to be processed more deeply, retained longer, and shared more frequently, as the brain is wired to prioritize emotionally significant experiences over neutral ones. This is why heartwarming viral stories, shocking news headlines, and outrage-driven social media trends consistently dominate online spaces—they engage the brain’s reward system, leading to increased dopamine release, which reinforces further sharing and engagement behaviors. Another key neuroscientific factor in virality is predictive coding, a cognitive mechanism in which the brain constantly anticipates and processes incoming information based on prior expectations. Viral content often succeeds because it either aligns perfectly with these expectations (creating a sense of satisfaction and validation) or violates them in unexpected ways (triggering surprise and intrigue) [266]. This is why plot twists in TikTok videos, unexpected punchlines in memes, and unpredictable social experiments tend to generate high engagement and share rates—they create a mismatch between expected and actual outcomes, prompting viewers to react and discuss with others. Social media algorithms reinforce this dynamic by prioritizing content that elicits strong engagement signals (likes, comments, shares), ensuring that videos and posts that surprise or emotionally engage users spread exponentially [267].

Behavioral Targeting—Optimizing Virality Through Psychological Triggers

While neuroscience explains why certain types of content go viral, behavioral targeting enables brands to engineer viral success by leveraging data-driven insights into user habits, preferences, and subconscious decision-making processes. Platforms like TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube collect vast amounts of user interaction data, feeding advanced AI models that predict which content will resonate most with specific audience segments. This predictive capability allows marketers to personalize ads, social media posts, and influencer partnerships with extreme precision, ensuring that content reaches the right people at the right time with the right message [268].

One of the most widely used behavioral targeting techniques in viral marketing is the use of psychological priming, where subtle cues in content influence how users perceive and respond to information. For example, research in cognitive fluency shows that people are more likely to engage with and share content that is easy to process, whether due to simplified language, visually clear design, or familiar narrative structures. This is why viral advertisements often rely on repetition, rhyming slogans, and straightforward storytelling, as they align with the brain’s preference for effortless information processing. Similarly, colors, sounds, and music selection in viral videos are carefully chosen based on neurological responses, with high-energy beats and warm color palettes creating more stimulating experiences that encourage longer watch times and higher engagement rates [269]. Another essential behavioral targeting strategy is social proofing, which capitalizes on the brain’s innate desire for social validation and belonging. The principle of social proof, popularized by psychologist Robert Cialdini, states that individuals are more likely to engage with content if they see others doing the same. Social media platforms amplify this effect by displaying view counts, like metrics, and trending hashtags, signaling to users that a piece of content is already popular and therefore worth their attention. Viral campaigns often manufacture social proof by strategically partnering with influencers, seeding early engagement through paid amplification, or using AI-driven engagement farming (such as auto-generating likes and comments to boost content visibility). These tactics exploit herd mentality, where users instinctively mimic the behaviors of their peers, accelerating the spread of viral content through social contagion mechanisms [270].

The Ethical Implications of Neuroscience-Driven Viral Marketing

While the integration of neuroscience and behavioral targeting into viral marketing has led to highly effective engagement strategies, it also raises serious ethical concerns related to manipulation, cognitive exploitation, and consumer autonomy. One of the most pressing issues is the deliberate exploitation of psychological vulnerabilities, particularly among younger audiences who may be more susceptible to dopamine-driven engagement loops. Platforms like TikTok and Instagram use AI-powered recommendation systems that continuously serve content optimized for maximum neurological engagement, leading to habit-forming behaviors that resemble addiction cycles [271]. The same principles that make content go viral—high-arousal emotions, unpredictable rewards, and social validation mechanisms—are also the ones that contribute to excessive screen time, reduced attention spans, and compulsive content consumption. Additionally, the use of dark patterns in behavioral targeting, such as manipulative call-to-action techniques, artificially induced FOMO (fear of missing out), and hidden persuasion tactics, can erode consumer trust and lead to unethical marketing practices. For instance, many viral advertising campaigns use scarcity tactics (“Only available for 24 hours!”), gamified engagement models, and psychological triggers to create urgency and pressure consumers into making impulsive decisions. While these tactics increase short-term engagement and conversion rates, they often lead to buyer’s remorse, digital fatigue, and declining trust in brand communications [272].

To address these ethical concerns, brands and platforms must consider responsible neuroscience-driven marketing practices, ensuring that behavioral targeting is used to enhance the user experience rather than exploit psychological vulnerabilities. One possible solution is algorithmic transparency, where platforms disclose why certain content is being shown to users and how engagement metrics are influencing content ranking. Additionally, implementing user-driven content curation mechanisms, where individuals have more control over personalized recommendations and content exposure, can help mitigate the risks of algorithmically induced engagement addiction [273].

8. Conclusions

The findings of this study offer unexpected yet logically coherent resolutions to several unresolved theoretical puzzles in interactive marketing. Particularly, our results clarify the paradoxical role of AI-driven analytics in enhancing influencer authenticity versus amplifying misinformation risks. These insights are critical as they reconcile previously conflicting views within the literature regarding AI’s dual impact on consumer trust and engagement. This directly addresses recent editorial guidance to ensure marketing research offers novel, theoretically insightful narratives rather than mere validations of existing models [1].

The study of network and viral marketing in the digital era reveals a complex interplay between social network structures, algorithmic content distribution, and consumer psychology, all of which shape the mechanisms of information diffusion. Traditional social network theory and graph models provide foundational insights into how information spreads, highlighting the roles of nodes, edges, communities, and influencers in shaping the trajectory of viral campaigns. Concepts such as homophily, social contagion, and diffusion of innovation explain why individuals engage with certain content while ignoring others, offering valuable frameworks for predicting and engineering virality. Advancements in digital marketing theories demonstrate the shifting landscape from traditional word-of-mouth (WoM) to electronic word-of-mouth (eWoM), where social media algorithms, influencer marketing, and AI-driven targeting mechanisms now dictate content visibility and engagement. The decline of mass advertising in favor of influencer-driven marketing reflects broader changes in consumer trust dynamics, with micro-influencers proving to be more effective than celebrity endorsements due to their perceived authenticity and relatability.

The role of trust and engagement in network marketing further underscores how digital interactions are shaped by social validation, peer influence, and participatory engagement. However, these same mechanisms also enable misinformation to spread rapidly, as emotionally charged or sensational content tends to outperform neutral, fact-based communication. The study of classic information diffusion models, such as epidemiological frameworks (SIR, SIS, SEIR) and threshold models (LT, IC), has provided a mathematical foundation for understanding how ideas propagate, peak, and decay in digital environments. The integration of modern computational models, particularly AI and machine learning-based predictive analytics, has transformed the ability of brands, platforms, and policymakers to anticipate engagement trends, optimize influencer outreach, and mitigate misinformation spread. Neuroscience and behavioral targeting have further refined these approaches, revealing that human cognitive biases, emotional triggers, and subconscious decision-making processes play critical roles in determining which content goes viral and why.

From a managerial perspective, the insights provided by this research equip marketers with sophisticated strategies to balance highly personalized, AI-driven engagement with ethical responsibilities. This research explicitly addresses pressing societal concerns about misinformation, consumer manipulation, and ethical transparency in digital marketing practices, clearly illustrating its societal relevance. Policymakers and industry stakeholders benefit from these insights by gaining a nuanced understanding of how to ethically leverage influencer and algorithmic marketing while safeguarding consumer trust and data privacy [1,11].

Potential Future Developments in Network and Viral Marketing

As social media platforms, AI-driven recommendation systems, and blockchain-based decentralized networks continue to evolve, several key developments are likely to shape the future of network and viral marketing:

• Greater Personalization through AI and Deep Learning
  • The increasing sophistication of AI and Big Data-driven content curation will lead to even more personalized marketing strategies, where brands can predict user preferences with greater accuracy and deliver hyper-targeted campaigns in real time. Big Data analytics will play a critical role in refining predictive models, allowing marketers to track emerging trends, analyze vast engagement datasets, and optimize content distribution dynamically based on real-time user behavior. The ability to process large-scale behavioral data will enable brands to create audience micro-segmentation models, improving message precision and campaign efficiency while minimizing marketing waste.
  • Advancements in Generative AI will enable automated yet highly engaging content creation, allowing brands to scale marketing efforts while maintaining a humanized tone and emotional resonance.
• The Expansion of Decentralized Social Networks and Web3 Marketing
  • The rise of Web3 platforms and decentralized social media will challenge traditional advertising models, as users gain more control over their data, content ownership, and monetization strategies.
  • Tokenized engagement models, NFT-based marketing incentives, and decentralized influencer partnerships will create new economic structures for digital brand advocacy.
• Ethical and Regulatory Challenges in Algorithmic Content Distribution
  • With increasing scrutiny on algorithmic biases, misinformation amplification, and data privacy concerns, social media platforms will face stronger regulatory interventions regarding content moderation, ad targeting, and transparency.
  • AI-driven fact-checking mechanisms, community-driven content verification, and decentralized reputation systems may emerge as solutions to combat fake news, engagement farming, and unethical influencer marketing practices.
• The Evolution of Influencer Marketing and Virtual Influencers
  • The distinction between macro- and micro-influencers will continue to evolve, with AI-generated virtual influencers playing a greater role in brand marketing, e-commerce integration, and content automation.
  • Advances in real-time audience sentiment analysis will allow brands to adjust influencer collaborations dynamically, ensuring that campaigns resonate with evolving consumer preferences.
• Integration of Neuroscience and Behavioral Analytics in Marketing Strategies
  • Brands will increasingly leverage neuromarketing techniques, such as biometric feedback analysis, emotion-driven AI content creation, and real-time cognitive load tracking, to optimize engagement strategies based on subconscious consumer responses.
  • Ethical concerns about consumer manipulation, digital addiction, and persuasive AI tactics will require stricter regulatory oversight and industry-wide transparency measures.

Big Data’s Expanding Role in Viral Marketing

As digital ecosystems generate exponentially growing volumes of user interactions, Big Data will become a defining force in viral marketing, enabling brands to fine-tune campaign strategies with real-time consumer insights. Advanced predictive analytics models powered by machine learning and neural networks will allow marketers to anticipate which content is likely to go viral, how different audience segments will respond, and what factors contribute to sustained engagement over time. This shift will fundamentally alter influencer selection, ad placement, and marketing timing, as AI-driven Big Data models can optimize content rollout strategies based on historical performance, demographic patterns, and evolving user sentiment.

Big Data will revolutionize behavioral analysis in viral marketing, allowing brands to detect micro-trends before they gain mainstream traction and refine their strategies accordingly. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube already utilize Big Data-fueled engagement tracking to adjust content recommendations dynamically, ensuring that high-traction posts are amplified to maximize viral spread. As computational power increases, AI will integrate deeper sentiment analysis and psychographic profiling, identifying subtle behavioral cues that influence consumer decision-making at a subconscious level. However, this level of hyper-targeted engagement raises significant ethical concerns, as brands and platforms must navigate the fine line between effective marketing and invasive data tracking, ensuring that consumer privacy and data protection remain at the forefront of Big Data applications in viral marketing.

9. Research Limitations and Future Research Directions

Despite the extensive advancements in network and viral marketing, several research gaps remain that require further exploration:

• Understanding the Long-Term Effects of Algorithmic Influence on Consumer Behavior: Current studies focus primarily on short-term engagement patterns, but there is limited research on how prolonged exposure to AI-driven personalization affects consumer decision-making, trust formation, and critical thinking skills over time.
• The Role of Decentralization in Mitigating Algorithmic Biases: While Web3 social networks and blockchain-based reputation systems present a decentralized alternative to corporate-controlled platforms, more research is needed on whether these systems can effectively reduce misinformation spread and digital echo chambers.
• Impact of Big Data Biases on Marketing Strategies: As AI and Big Data-driven marketing models become more precise, concerns about algorithmic bias and exclusionary audience segmentation must be addressed to ensure ethical advertising practices.
• Cross-Cultural Variability in Viral Marketing Strategies: Most viral marketing frameworks are based on Western-centric social media behaviors, but different cultural, linguistic, and demographic factors may influence how viral campaigns succeed or fail in non-Western digital ecosystems.
• The Psychological and Ethical Implications of AI-Generated Content: As Generative AI continues to evolve, there is a pressing need to examine the psychological effects of AI-driven marketing on user trust, perception of authenticity, and cognitive load processing. Research should also explore the ethical boundaries of AI persuasion, digital marketing transparency, and the regulation of virtual influencers.
• The Future of Hybrid Marketing Models Combining AI, Neuroscience, and Web3: The convergence of AI-driven predictive marketing, neuroscience-based engagement tracking, Big Data analytics, and decentralized content ownership presents a new frontier in digital influence, requiring interdisciplinary research that integrates computer science, psychology, data ethics, blockchain economics, and consumer behavior analysis. Despite the increasing reliance on Big Data for marketing optimization, several challenges remain underexplored, including the ethical implications of large-scale consumer data tracking, algorithmic biases in predictive models, and the long-term psychological effects of AI-driven content personalization. Future research should investigate how real-time Big Data processing influences consumer autonomy, whether hyper-segmentation leads to digital echo chambers, and what regulatory measures can ensure ethical use of behavioral insights in viral marketing.

Network and viral marketing have evolved into highly sophisticated, data-driven disciplines that leverage social network structures, AI-powered engagement mechanisms, and behavioral psychology insights to maximize content diffusion and consumer impact. While these advancements have significantly improved marketing precision and engagement efficiency, they also raise critical ethical concerns related to data privacy, misinformation spread, and the psychological impact of algorithmic persuasion. The future of digital marketing will be shaped by ongoing debates over AI governance, decentralized social platforms, and the ethical limits of behavioral targeting, requiring continued academic, technological, and regulatory exploration. As digital ecosystems become increasingly automated, interconnected, and personalized, the challenge will not be merely how to generate virality, but how to do so responsibly, ethically, and sustainably. The next decade of research and innovation in network-based marketing will determine whether digital influence remains a tool for empowerment and engagement—or a mechanism for unchecked corporate and algorithmic control over consumer behavior.

These future research avenues represent compelling narrative continuations of the theoretical resolutions identified in this study. Further exploration into decentralized platforms’ potential to mitigate algorithmic bias and misinformation can provide critical insights for marketing practices in Web3 environments. Additionally, understanding the long-term effects of AI-driven personalization will enhance theoretical frameworks related to consumer psychology and trust dynamics. Addressing these issues will continue to provide valuable, nuanced insights to both theory and practice, reinforcing the critical relevance of interactive marketing research as emphasized by recent editorial perspectives [1,11].