From Technology to Traffic: How Website Technological Sophistication, Brand Recognition, and Business Model Innovation Drive Consumer Traffic in Korean E-Commerce
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- How does brand recognition moderate or amplify the effects of website sophistication on consumer behavior? That is, do highly sophisticated websites provide greater benefits to well-established brands, or do they offer a competitive advantage to lesser-known brands?
- What are the potential synergies or conflicts between a company’s innovative business model and its website’s technological features?
2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Technology Adoption and Innovation Diffusion in E-Commerce Consumer Traffic
2.2. Website Technological Sophistication and Business Model Innovation
2.3. Website Technological Sophistication and Brand Recognition
3. Methodology
3.1. Data Sources and Sample
3.2. Variable Operationalization
3.2.1. Dependent Variable
3.2.2. Independent Variable
3.2.3. Moderating Variables
3.2.4. Control Variables
Variable Type | Variable Name | Measurement | Data Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Dependent Variable | Monthly consumer visits | Monthly website visits metric | SEMrush |
Independent Variable | Technological sophistication | Active Technology Count | BuiltWith |
Moderating Variable | Business model innovation | Novel keyword combinations in industry categories | Crunchbase |
Moderating Variable | Brand recognition | Trademark registration counts | IPQwery |
Control Variable | Company size | The number of employees (categorized as 1 if the company had over 500 employees) | Crunchbase |
Control Variable | Age | The number of years since the company’s founding | Crunchbase |
Control Variable | Social media presence | Coded 1 if the company had Facebook or Twitter followers | Crunchbase |
Control Variable | Technological asset | Patent counts | IPQwery |
Control Variable | Industry categories | Dummy variables for each of the seven industry categories | Crunchbase |
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Sectoral Characteristics
4.3. Hypothesis Testing: OLS Regression Results
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Summary of Findings
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Practical Implications
5.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions
5.5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. Measuring E-commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2004, 9, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-year Update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auger, P. The Impact of Interactivity and Design Sophistication on the Performance of Commercial Websites for Small Businesses. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2005, 43, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, B.; Jimenez, J.; Martin, M.J. Key Website Factors in E-business Strategy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2009, 29, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarafdar, M.; Zhang, J. Determinants of Reach and Loyalty: A Study of Website Performance and Implications for Website Design. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2008, 48, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
- Prokofyeva, N.; Boltunova, V. Analysis and Practical Application of PHP Frameworks in Development of Web Information Systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 104, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nebeling, M.; Norrie, M.C. Responsive design and development: Methods, technologies and current issues. In International Conference on Web Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa Shuaibu, B.; Md Norwawi, N.; Selamat, M.H.; Al-Alwani, A. Systematic review of web application security development model. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2015, 43, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivaji, A.; Downe, A.G.; Mazlan, M.F.; Soo, S.T.; Abdullah, A. Importance of incorporating fundamental usability with social & trust elements for e-commerce website. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications 2011, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–7 June 2011; pp. 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beldad, A.; De Jong, M.; Steehouder, M. How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Rios, R.E.; Riquelme, H.E. Brand Equity for Online Companies. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2008, 26, 719–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christodoulides, G.; De Chernatony, L. Consumer-based Brand Equity Conceptualization and Measurement: A Literature Review. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2010, 52, 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbitt, B.J.; Thanasankit, T.; Yi, H. Trust and E-commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2003, 2, 203–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruggieri, R.; Savastano, M.; Scalingi, A.; Bala, D.; D’Ascenzo, F. The Impact of Digital Platforms on Business Models: An Empirical Investigation on Innovative Start-ups. Manag. Mark. 2018, 13, 1210–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.R.; Bao, Y.; Sorwar, G. Investigating Factors Influencing the Adoption of e-Health in Developing Countries: A Patient’s Perspective. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2017, 42, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chesbrough, H. Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, M. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.; Stoel, L. Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slyke, C.V.; Belanger, F.; Comunale, C.L. Factors Influencing the Adoption of Web-based Shopping: The Impact of Trust. Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst. 2004, 35, 32–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, C.M.; Wang, E.T.; Fang, Y.H.; Huang, H.Y. Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Inf. Syst. J. 2014, 24, 85–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganguly, B.; Dash, S.B.; Cyr, D.; Head, M. The effects of website design on purchase intention in online shopping: The mediating role of trust and the moderating role of culture. Int. J. Electron. Bus. 2010, 8, 302–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Lennon, S.J. Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention: Based on the stimulus-organism-response model. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2013, 7, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrebi, S.; Jallais, J. Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 22, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chopdar, P.K.; Korfiatis, N.; Sivakumar, V.J.; Lytras, M.D. Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: A cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 86, 109–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amit, R.; Zott, C. Value Creation in E-business. Strateg. Manag. J. 2001, 22, 493–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zott, C.; Amit, R. Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. Organ. Sci. 2007, 18, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idoga, P.E.; Toycan, M.; Nadiri, H.; Çelebi, E. Factors Affecting the Successful Adoption of E-health Cloud Based Health System from Healthcare Consumers’ Perspective. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 71216–71228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krotov, V.; Junglas, I.; Steel, D. The Mobile Agility Framework: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Technology Enhancing Organizational Agility. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2015, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, F.; Mahajan, V.; Balasubramanian, S. An Analysis of E-business Adoption and Its Impact on Business Performance. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2014, 31, 425–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tornatzky, L.G.; Klein, K.J. Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-implementation: A Meta-analysis of Findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 1982, 29, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T. The Value of IT-Enabled Retailer Learning: Can Personalized Product Recommendations (PPRS) Improve Customer Store Loyalty in Electronic Markets? University of Maryland: College Park, ML, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hannafin, M.J.; Rieber, L.P. Psychological Foundations of Instructional Design for Emerging Computer-based Instructional Technologies: Part II. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 1989, 37, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M.; Gurrea, R. The Role Played by Perceived Usability, Satisfaction and Consumer Trust on Website Loyalty. Inf. Manag. 2006, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimov, F.P.; Brengman, M.; Van Hove, L. The effect of website design dimensions on initial trust: A synthesis of the empirical literature. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 2011, 12, 272–301. [Google Scholar]
- Ganguly, B.; Dash, S.B.; Cyr, D. Website characteristics, Trust and purchase intention in online stores:-An Empirical study in the Indian context. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, 22–44. [Google Scholar]
- Erdem, T.; Swait, J. Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon. J. Consum. Psychol. 1998, 7, 131–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan-Thomas, A.; Veloutsou, C. Beyond Technology Acceptance: Brand Relationships and Online Brand Experience. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantinides, E. Influencing the Online Consumer’s Behavior: The Web Experience. Internet Res. 2004, 14, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Adwan, A.S.; Kokash, H.; Adwan, A.A.; Alhorani, A.; Yaseen, H. Building Customer Loyalty in Online Shopping: The Role of Online Trust, Online Satisfaction, and Electronic Word of Mouth. Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail. 2020, 11, 278–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mean | S.D. | Min | Max | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Monthly consumer visits * | 2.70 | 4.25 | 0 | 19.27 |
2 | Technological sophistication * | 2.38 | 1.00 | 0 | 5.12 |
3 | Business model innovation | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0 | 1 |
4 | Brand recognition | 0.76 | 7.53 | 0 | 369 |
5 | Technological assets | 1.74 | 19.81 | 0 | 950 |
6 | Social media presence (Twitter) | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0 | 1 |
7 | Social media presence (Facebook) | 0.48 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 |
8 | Company size | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0 | 1 |
9 | Age | 12.48 | 7.76 | 1 | 37 |
10 | Industry category_Technology | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0 | 1 |
11 | Industry category_Media | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0 | 1 |
12 | Industry category_Healthcare | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0 | 1 |
13 | Industry category_Education | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0 | 1 |
14 | Industry category_Retail | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0 | 1 |
15 | Industry category_Finance | 0.04 | 0.2 | 0 | 1 |
16 | Industry category_Food and Beverage | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
1 | 1 | |||||||
2 | 0.37 * | 1 | ||||||
3 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1 | |||||
4 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1 | ||||
5 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.29 * | 1 | |||
6 | 0.23 * | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1 | ||
7 | 0.24 | 0.23 * | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.3 | 1 | |
8 | 0.19 * | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.19 * | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 1 |
9 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.22 * | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | −0.08 | 0.18 |
10 | −0.06 | 0.02 | −0.04 | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.06 | −0.05 |
11 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −0.02 | 0 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.07 | −0.02 |
12 | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 | −0.01 | −0.04 | 0.03 |
13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0 |
14 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.04 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.02 |
15 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 |
16 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | |
9 | 1 | |||||||
10 | −0.05 | 1 | ||||||
11 | 0.01 | −0.24 * | 1 | |||||
12 | 0.06 | −0.21 * | −0.09 | 1 | ||||
13 | 0.01 | −0.14 | −0.06 | −0.06 | 1 | |||
14 | −0.04 | −0.21 * | −0.09 | −0.08 | −0.06 | 1 | ||
15 | 0.01 | −0.16 * | −0.07 | −0.06 | −0.04 | −0.06 | 1 | |
16 | −0.01 | −0.09 | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.02 | 1 |
Model 1 | |
---|---|
Technological sophistication | 1.301 *** |
(0.039) | |
Business model innovation | 0.413 *** |
(0.083) | |
Brand recognition | 0.014 |
(0.010) | |
Technological assets | 0.003 |
(0.003) | |
Social media presence (Twitter) | 1.521 *** |
(0.141) | |
Social media presence (Facebook) | 1.038 *** |
(0.086) | |
Company size | 3.315 *** |
(0.337) | |
Company age | 0.051 *** |
(0.005) | |
Industry category_Technology | −0.007 |
(0.093) | |
Industry category_Retail | 0.989 *** |
(0.185) | |
Industry category_Media | 0.494 ** |
(0.156) | |
Industry category_Healthcare | 0.353 * |
(0.156) | |
Industry category_Food and Beverage | 0.507 |
(0.347) | |
Industry category_Finance | 1.174 *** |
(0.226) | |
Industry category_Education | 0.562 * |
(0.226) | |
Constant | −2.252 *** |
(0.115) | |
Observations | 9003 |
R-squared | 0.229 |
Log likelihood | −24,640 |
Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|
Technological sophistication | 1.135 *** | 1.316 *** | 1.147 *** |
(0.048) | (0.039) | (0.048) | |
Business model innovation | −0.550 ** | 0.423 *** | −0.567 *** |
(0.170) | (0.083) | (0.170) | |
Technological sophistication X Business model innovation | 0.402 *** | 0.413 *** | |
(0.078) | (0.078) | ||
Brand recognition | 0.013 | 0.191 ** | 0.193 *** |
(0.010) | (0.059) | (0.059) | |
Technological sophistication X Brand recognition | −0.049 ** | −0.050 ** | |
(0.016) | (0.016) | ||
Technological assets | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
(0.003) | (0.003) | (0.003) | |
Social media presence (Twitter) | 1.500 *** | 1.508 *** | 1.486 *** |
(0.141) | (0.141) | (0.140) | |
Social media presence (Facebook) | 1.036 *** | 1.043 *** | 1.040 *** |
(0.086) | (0.086) | (0.086) | |
Company size | 3.293 *** | 3.305 *** | 3.282 *** |
(0.336) | (0.335) | (0.334) | |
Company age | 0.051 *** | 0.050 *** | 0.050 *** |
(0.005) | (0.005) | (0.005) | |
Industry category_Technology | −0.015 | −0.003 | −0.011 |
(0.093) | (0.093) | (0.093) | |
Industry category_Retail | 1.000 *** | 0.968 *** | 0.979 *** |
(0.185) | (0.186) | (0.186) | |
Industry category_Media | 0.508 ** | 0.494 ** | 0.508 ** |
(0.156) | (0.156) | (0.155) | |
Industry category_Healthcare | 0.371 * | 0.286 + | 0.302 + |
(0.156) | (0.156) | (0.156) | |
Industry category_Food and Beverage | 0.500 | 0.477 | 0.469 |
(0.349) | (0.347) | (0.349) | |
Industry category_Finance | 1.183 *** | 1.181 *** | 1.191 *** |
(0.226) | (0.226) | (0.226) | |
Industry category_Education | 0.557 * | 0.553 * | 0.548 * |
(0.226) | (0.227) | (0.227) | |
Constant | −1.863 *** | −2.296 *** | −1.897 *** |
(0.126) | (0.115) | (0.126) | |
Observations | 9003 | 9003 | 9003 |
R-squared | 0.231 | 0.232 | 0.234 |
Log likelihood | −24,628 | −24,623 | −24,610 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yu, S.; Liu, Y.; Hyun, E.-j. From Technology to Traffic: How Website Technological Sophistication, Brand Recognition, and Business Model Innovation Drive Consumer Traffic in Korean E-Commerce. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030100
Yu S, Liu Y, Hyun E-j. From Technology to Traffic: How Website Technological Sophistication, Brand Recognition, and Business Model Innovation Drive Consumer Traffic in Korean E-Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2024; 19(3):2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030100
Chicago/Turabian StyleYu, Si, Yutong Liu, and Eun-jung Hyun. 2024. "From Technology to Traffic: How Website Technological Sophistication, Brand Recognition, and Business Model Innovation Drive Consumer Traffic in Korean E-Commerce" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 3: 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030100
APA StyleYu, S., Liu, Y., & Hyun, E. -j. (2024). From Technology to Traffic: How Website Technological Sophistication, Brand Recognition, and Business Model Innovation Drive Consumer Traffic in Korean E-Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030100