Motivations toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth Sending Behavior Regarding Restaurant Experiences in the Millennial Generation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Motivations toward EWOM Sending Behavior
2.2. The Millennial Generation and Their Behavior of Sending EWOM Regarding Restaurants
3. Proposed Model and Hypothesis Formulation
4. Methodology
4.1. Measure Instrument
4.2. Sampling and Data Collection
4.3. Data Analysis
5. Results
Hypothesis Contrast of the Theoretical Model
6. Discussion and Conclusions
7. Implications
7.1. Theoretical Implications
7.2. Managerial Implications
8. Limitations and Future Research Lines
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rey-Ares, L.; Fernández-López, S.; Castro-González, S.; Rodeiro-Pazos, D. Does self-control constitute a driver of millennials’ financial behaviors and attitudes? J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 2021, 93, 101702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llopis-Amorós, M.P.; Gil-Saura, I.; Ruiz-Molina, M.E.; Fuentes-Blasco, M. Social media communications and festival brand equity: Millennials vs Centennials. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 40, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namin, A.; Ratchford, B.T.; Saint Clair, J.K.; Bui, M.; Hamilton, M.L. Dine-in or take-out: Modeling millennials’ cooking motivation and choice. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101981. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698919303121 (accessed on 20 March 2024). [CrossRef]
- Fine, M.B.; Gironda, J.; Petrescu, M. Prosumer motivations for electronic word-of-mouth communication behaviors. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2017, 8, 280–295. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/prosumer-motivations-electronic-word-mouth/docview/1935421222/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 5 August 2023). [CrossRef]
- Akdim, K. The influence of eWOM. Analyzing its characteristics and consequences, and future research lines. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 2021, 25, 239–259. [Google Scholar]
- Kou, I.E. Book review: Millennials, generation Z and the future of tourism. J. Tour. Futures 2023, 9, 438–439. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/book-review-millennials-generation-z-future/docview/2864473689/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Haq, J.U.; Hussain, S. Millennials’ online perceptions: The role of cultural characteristics in creating e-loyalty. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 74, 1031–1047. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/millennials-online-perceptions-role-cultural/docview/2718747423/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 21 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Koufie, G.; Kesa, H. Millennials motivation for sharing restaurant dining experiences on social media. Afr. J. Hosp. Tour. Leis. 2020, 9, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Dixit, S.K.; Prayag, G. Gastronomic tourism experiences and experiential marketing. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2022, 47, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latifah, A.H.; Setyowardhani, H. Factors influencing the intensity of using digital social networks among indonesian millennial tourists. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2020, 21, 1139–1152. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/factors-influencing-intensity-using-digital/docview/2521669967/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Pauliene, R.; Sedneva, K. The Influence of Recommendations in Social Media on Purchase Intentions of Generations Y and Z. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 2019, 10, 227–256. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/influence-recommendations-social-media-on/docview/2549095544/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Ha, L.T.T.; Vo, T.T. Motivations of guests contributing sWOM on social media: A case in Vietnam. J. Asian Bus. Econ. Stud. 2022, 29, 146–162. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/motivations-guests-contributing-swom-on-social/docview/2716510981/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 5 August 2023).
- Ghiselli, R.; Ma, J. Restaurant social media usage in China: A study of industry practices and consumer preferences. Dr John Bowen DSB, editor. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2015, 7, 251–265. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/restaurant-social-media-usage-china/docview/1685173879/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 5 August 2023).
- Bangsawan, S.; Marquette, C.J.; Mahrinasari, M.S. Consumer restaurant experience, electronic word of mouth and purchase intention in the Indonesian restaurant industry. J. Glob. Bus. Adv. 2017, 10, 613–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabermajidi, N.; Valaei, N.; Balaji, M.S.; Goh, S.K. Measuring brand-related content in social media: A socialization theory perspective. Inf. Technol. People 2020, 33, 1281–1302. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/measuring-brand-related-content-social-media/docview/2533902334/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 5 August 2023). [CrossRef]
- Okumus, B.; Ali, F.; Bilgihan, A.; Ozturk, A.B. Psychological factors influencing customers’ acceptance of smartphone diet apps when ordering food at restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 72, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lima, M.M.; Mainardes, E.; Cavalcanti, A.L. Influence of social media on restaurant consumers: A case study of Crab island restaurant. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2019, 22, 413–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin-Young, K.; Hwang, J. Who is an evangelist? Food tourists’ positive and negative eWOM behavior. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 555–577. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/who-is-evangelist-food-tourists-positive-negative/docview/2652817501/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 11 December 2023).
- Ma, F.; DiPietro, R.B.; Li, J.; Harris, K.J. Memorable dining experiences amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 35, 871–892. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/memorable-dining-experiences-amidst-covid-19/docview/2773692949/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 8 August 2023). [CrossRef]
- Line, N.D.; Hanks, L.; Dogru, T. A reconsideration of the EWOM construct in restaurant research: What are we really measuring? Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 3479–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haro-Sosa, G.L.; Moliner-Velázquez, B.; Gil-Saura, I. Motivaciones, compromiso y adopción del e-WOM en restaurantes. Estud. Gerenciales 2022, 38, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uslu, A. The relationship of service quality dimensions of restaurant enterprises with satisfaction, behavioural intention, eWOM, and the moderating effect of atmosphere. Tour. Manag. Stud. 2020, 16, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haro-Sosa, G.; Moliner-Velázquez, B.; Gil-Saura, I.; Fuentes-Blasco, M. Influence of Electronic Word-Of-Mouth on Restaurant Choice Decisions: Does It Depend on Gender in the Millennial Generation? J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 615–632. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/0718-1876/19/1/33 (accessed on 8 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Calder, B.J.; Malthouse, E.C.; Schaedel, U. An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness. J. Interact. Mark. 2009, 23, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. A model of the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and the motivations to deliver word-of-mouth online. Psihologija 2018, 51, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Equihua, D.; Romero, J.; Casaló, L.V. Better the devil you know? The moderating role of brand familiarity and indulgence vs. restraint cultural dimension on eWOM influence in the hospitality industry. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 310–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.; Walsh, G.; Gremler, D. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daugherty, T.; Eastin, M.; Bright, L. Exploring Consumer Motivations for Creating User-Generated Content. J. Interact. Advert. 2008, 8, 16–25. Available online: http://www.jiad.org/ (accessed on 20 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Jang, S.C. Restaurant-visit intention: Do anthropomorphic cues, brand awareness and subjective social class interact? Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 2359–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendoza-Moreira, M.; Moliner-Velázquez, B. Efectos de las consultas boca a boca en redes sociales en la compra de cosméticos en Ecuador. Estud. Gerenciales 2022, 38, 358–369. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/efectos-de-las-consultas-boca-en-redes-sociales/docview/2718386686/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 23 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Moliner-Velázquez, B.; Fuentes-Blasco, M.; Gil-Saura, I. Motivations and attitudes towards consulting eWOM when booking accommodation. Serv. Bus. 2023, 17, 557–578. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/motivations-attitudes-towards-consulting-ewom/docview/2822890366/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 19 November 2023). [CrossRef]
- Bulut, Z.A.; Karabulut, A.N. Examining the role of two aspects of eWOM in online repurchase intention: An integrated trust–loyalty perspective. J. Consum. Behav. 2018, 17, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toscanini, M.; Lapo-Maza, M.; Bustamante, M.A. Dollarization in Ecuador: A review of macroeconomic results in the last two decades. Inf. Tecnológica 2020, 31, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velásquez, A.; Carrión, G.; Yaguache, J. Use the Internet and Facebook in ecuadorian teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Gran Canaria, Spain, 15–18 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Babić Rosario, A.; de Valck, K.; Sotgiu, F. Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 422–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, N.; Pandey, N.; Mishra, A. Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 135, 758–773. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321004951 (accessed on 4 October 2023). [CrossRef]
- Bilal, M.; Jianqiu, Z.; Akram, U.; Tanveer, Y.; Sohaib, M.; Raza, M.A.A. The role of motivational factors for determining attitude towards eWOM in social media context. In Research Anthology on Social Media Advertising and Building Consumer Relationships; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 283–303. [Google Scholar]
- Llorens-Marin, M.; Hernandez, A.; Puelles-Gallo, M. Altruism in eWOM: Propensity to Write Reviews on Hotel Experience. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 2238–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, W.; Cai, J.; Li, L. Electronic word-of-mouth in China: A motivational analysis. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government, ICEE2011, Shanghai, China, 6–8 May 2011; pp. 1263–1268. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee Mr, Z.W.Y. An Examination into the Determinants of Positive and Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication. Int. Conf. Electron. Bus. 2011, 55, 182–189. [Google Scholar]
- Yap, K.B.; Soetarto, B.; Sweeney, J.C. The Relationship between Electronic Word-Of-Mouth Motivations and Message Characteristics: The Sender’s Perspective. Australas. Mark. J. 2013, 21, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 1977, 84, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, G.W. An analysis of attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of intentions and behavior. Speech Monogr. 1975, 42, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Liu, F. Investigating the dynamic mechanism of user willingness to actively publish travel-related Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) on tourism platforms. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0285773. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/investigating-dynamic-mechanism-user-willingness/docview/2872149260/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Power, D.J.; Cyphert, D.; Roth, R.M. Analytics, bias, and evidence: The quest for rational decision making. J. Decis. Syst. 2019, 28, 120–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zohora, F.T.; Choudhury, N.; Sakib, N. Analysis of Factors Influencing E-WOM Credibility. Int. J. Mark. Bus. Commun. 2017, 6, 8. Available online: http://www.publishingindia.com (accessed on 20 April 2024).
- Tarkiainen, A.; Sundqvist, S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 11, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahaman, A.; Kamrul Hassan, H.M.; Asheq, A.A.; Anwarul Islam, K.M. The interplay between eWOM information and purchase intention on social media: Through the lens of IAM and TAM theory. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272926. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/interplay-between-ewom-information-purchase/docview/2710947798/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 27 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abedi, E.; Ghorbanzadeh, D.; Rahehagh, A. Influence of eWOM information on consumers’ behavioral intentions in mobile social networks: Evidence of Iran. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2020, 17, 84–109. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/influence-ewom-information-on-consumers/docview/2533874633/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.C.; Chen, L.Y.; Su, Y.T. Exploration of the Influence of Online Reviews on Consumers’ Purchase Intention. Int. J. Adv. Stud. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2020, 9, 1–9. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/exploration-influence-online-reviews-on-consumers/docview/2547656642/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024).
- Alhidari, A.; Iyer, P.; Paswan, A. Personal level antecedents of eWOM and purchase intention, on social networking sites. J. Cust. Behav. 2015, 14, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzin, M.; Fattahi, M. eWOM through social networking sites and impact on purchase intention and brand image in Iran. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2018, 15, 161–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, S.P.; Nijssen, E.J. Consumer World-Mindedness. In Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son-Cong Bui, S.C.B.; Son-Cong Bui, Y.C.C. Generating positive online word of mouth via brand image and trust: The moderation role of perceived privacy. J. Bus. Adm. 2022, 47, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, C.L.A.; Tang, C.H.H. Hotel attribute performance, eWOM motivations, and media choice. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 46, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkov, I.; Gorgadze, A.; Trabskaia, I. Satisfaction dimensions influencing consumers’ behavioral intentions through structural topic modeling analysis of restaurant reviews. Consum. Behav. Tour. Hosp. 2023, 18, 200–214. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/satisfaction-dimensions-influencing-consumers/docview/2842548907/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 15 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Equihua, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Romero, J. How old is your soul? Differences in the impact of eWOM on Generation X and millennials. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2022, 5, 553–566. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/how-old-is-your-soul-differences-impact-ewom-on/docview/2681389494/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 1 April 2024). [CrossRef]
- Bigné, E.; Ruiz, C.; Andreu, L.; Hernandez, B. The role of social motivations, ability, and opportunity in online know-how exchanges: Evidence from the airline services industry. Serv. Bus. 2015, 9, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y. Understanding How Chinese Consumers Engage in Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication (eWOM) on Social Media: A Comparison Study Between Opinion Leaders and Non-Opinion Leaders. Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn. 2020, 10, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Killian, M.; Fahy, J.; O’Loughlin, D. The Case for Altruism in eWoM Motivations. In Making a Difference Through Marketing: A Quest for Diverse Perspectives; Plewa, C., Conduit, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, V.; Ffytche, D.H.; Williams, S.C.R.; Gray, J.A. Personality Predicts Brain Responses to Cognitive Demands. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 10636. Available online: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/24/47/10636.abstract (accessed on 7 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eysenck, H.J. General features of the model. In A Model for Personality; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Amichai-Hamburger, Y.; Wainapel, G.; Fox, S. “On the Internet No One Knows I’m an Introvert”: Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. CyberPsychology Behav. 2002, 5, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowden-Green, T.; Hinds, J.; Joinson, A. How is extraversion related to social media use? A literature review. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2020, 164, 110040. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886920302294 (accessed on 7 March 2024). [CrossRef]
- Nowland, R.; Necka, E.A.; Cacioppo, J.T. Loneliness and Social Internet Use: Pathways to Reconnection in a Digital World? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 13, 70–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavigne, G.L.; Vallerand, R.J.; Crevier-Braud, L. The Fundamental Need to Belong: On the Distinction Between Growth and Deficit-Reduction Orientations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 37, 1185–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemay, E.P., Jr.; Spongberg, K. Perceiving and Wanting to Be Valued by Others: Implications for Cognition, Motivation, and Behavior in Romantic Relationships. J. Pers. 2015, 83, 464–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allen, K.A.; Kern, M.L.; Rozek, C.S.; McInerney, D.M.; Slavich, G.M. Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Aust. J. Psychol. 2021, 73, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Odoom, R.; Boateng, H.; Asante, B.O. An empirical investigation of perceived relational benefits and brand engagement in restaurant services. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 2767–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoisl, B.; Aigner, W.; Miksch, S. Social Rewarding in Wiki Systems—Motivating the Community. In Online Communities and Social Computing; Schuler, D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 362–371. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Dong, X.; McIntyre, S. Motivation of User-Generated Content: Social Connectedness Moderates the Effects of Monetary Rewards. Mark. Sci. 2017, 36, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundaram, D.S.; Mitra, K.; Webster, C. Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. ACR N. Am. Adv. 1998, 25, 527. [Google Scholar]
- Cheung, C.; Lee, M. What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 53, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reimer, T.; Benkenstein, M. Altruistic eWOM marketing: More than an alternative to monetary incentives. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 31, 323–333. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698916300030 (accessed on 7 March 2024). [CrossRef]
- Puspitasari, F.I.; Soebandhi, S.; Subagyo, D.H.; Nugroho, A. Altruism and Egoism in e-WOM: The moderating effect of Facebook perceived ease of use. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic), Semarang, Indonesia, 21–22 September 2019; pp. 536–541. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Pandey, M. Social Media and Impact of Altruistic Motivation, Egoistic Motivation, Subjective Norms, and EWOM toward Green Consumption Behavior: An Empirical Investigation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4222. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/social-media-impact-altruistic-motivation/docview/2785240469/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 16 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Milkman, R. A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post-2008 Wave of Protest. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2017, 82, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez, P.A.; Alvarado, C.A.C.; Mosquera, G.A.P. Las redes sociales como factor de decisión: Millennials frente a la generación X. Rev. Econ. Política 2018, 27, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anaya-Sánchez, R.; Castro-Bonaño, J.M.; González-Badía, E. Millennial Consumer Preferences in Social Commerce Web Design. Rev. Bras. Gestão Negócios 2020, 22, 123–139. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/millennial-consumer-preferences-social-commerce/docview/2345781494/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.Y.; Park, S. Rethinking millennials: How are they shaping the tourism industry? Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 25, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coba, G. Primicias. 2022. Millennials, la Generación Que Más Compra en Línea en Ecuador. 2022. Available online: https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/economia/millennials-compras-digitales-ecuador-comercio/ (accessed on 14 February 2024).
- Ntobela, T.S.; Mbukanma, I. Exploring the Impact of Sensory Marketing on Impulsive Buying Behaviour of Millennials in Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 2023, 12, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, D.L.; Crittenden, V.L.; Keo, T.; Mccarty, P. The use of social media: An exploratory study of usage among digital natives. J. Public Aff. 2012, 12, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.X. Effects of Restaurant Satisfaction and Knowledge Sharing Motivation on eWOM Intentions: The Moderating Role of Technology Acceptance Factors. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2017, 41, 93. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effects-restaurant-satisfaction-knowledge-sharing/docview/1851661254/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 19 November 2023). [CrossRef]
- Kellershohn, J.; Walley, K.; Vriesekoop, F. An international study of fast-food dining perceptions: Millennial parents, non-millennial parents, and peer judgement during fast-food family dining. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2021, 15, 598–614. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/international-study-fast-food-dining-perceptions/docview/2585705623/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 11 December 2023). [CrossRef]
- Reisenwitz, T.; Fowler, J. Information Sources and the Tourism Decision-making Process: An Examination of Generation X and Generation Y Consumers. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2019, 20, 097215091984893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barska, A. Millennial consumers in the convenience food market. Management 2018, 22, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frederick, D.P. Millennials Purchase Intention based on Food Vlogger Reviews—A Micro Study at Palghar District, Maharashtra. Srusti Manag. Rev. 2022, 15, 94–105. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/millennials-purchase-intention-based-on-food/docview/2728520519/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 2 October 2023).
- Harrington, R.J.; Ottenbacher, M.C.; Staggs, A.; Powell, F.A. Generation Y Consumers: Key Restaurant Attributes Affecting Positive and Negative Experiences. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2012, 36, 431. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/generation-y-consumers-key-restaurant-attributes/docview/1082363814/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 14 December 2023). [CrossRef]
- Okumus, B.; Ozturk, A.B. The impact of perceived stress on US millennials’ external and emotional eating behavior. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, D. Effects of Word-of-Mouth Communication on Purchasing Decisions in Restaurants: A Path Analytic Study. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences 2008. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effects-word-mouth-communication-on-purchasing/docview/621720890/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 16 March 2024).
- Yangklun, S.; Ketkaew, T.; Wongwandee, S.; Phacharoen, S.; Dansiri, W. Factors of Micro Influencers Affecting Purchase Decision of Millennial Consumers via Electronic Word-of-Mouth. UBRU Int. J. Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat Univ. 2022, 2, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, P.; Tse, E.C.Y. Exploring factors on customers’ restaurant choice: An analysis of restaurant attributes. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 2289–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maziriri, E.T.; Rukuni, T.F.; Chuchu, T. Factors influencing food consumption satisfaction and purchase decisions of restaurant consumers. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1968731. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/factors-influencing-food-consumption-satisfaction/docview/2614934627/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 19 November 2023). [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Wu, R. Is the devil in the details? Construal-level effects on perceived usefulness of online reviews for experience services. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2021, 46, 101033. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422321000053 (accessed on 25 September 2023). [CrossRef]
- Prasad, S.; Garg, A.; Prasad, S. Purchase decision of generation Y in an online environment. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2019, 37, 372–385. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/purchase-decision-generation-y-online-environment/docview/2225870617/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Ruangkanjanases, A.; Jeebjong, P.; Sonata, N.; Sanny, L. E-WOM and Its Impacts on Purchasing Behavior: A Comparative Study between Thai and Indonesian Millennials. Int. J. Electron. Commer. Stud. 2021, 12, 65–83. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/e-wom-impacts-on-purchasing-behavior-comparative/docview/2551715584/se-2?accountid=14777 (accessed on 13 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Walsh, G. Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 8, 51–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, M.; Luo, C.; Sia, C.; Chen, H. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2009, 13, 9–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serra-Cantallops, A.; Ramon-Cardona, J.; Salvi, F. The impact of positive emotional experiences on eWOM generation and loyalty. Span. J. Mark. ESIC 2018, 22, 142–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, E.; Jang, S. Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 356–366. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278431910000988 (accessed on 30 September 2023). [CrossRef]
- Reichelt, J.; Sievert, J.; Jacob, F. How credibility affects eWOM reading: The influences of expertise, trustworthiness, and similarity on utilitarian and social functions. J. Mark. Commun. 2014, 20, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhaoui, C.; Webster, C.M. Brand and consumer engagement behaviors on Facebook brand pages: Let’s have a (positive) conversation. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2021, 38, 155–175. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811620300562 (accessed on 17 February 2024). [CrossRef]
- Bronner, F.; de Hoog, R. Vacationers and eWOM: Who posts, and why, where, and what? J. Travel Res. 2011, 50, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, S.C.; Kim, Y. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. Int. J. Advert. 2011, 30, 47–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Thadani, D.R. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 54, 461–470. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923612001911 (accessed on 8 December 2023). [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.; Zhong, D. Using social network analysis to explain communication characteristics of travel-related electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Doorn, J.; Lemon, K.N.; Mittal, V.; Nass, S.; Pick, D.; Pirner, P.; Verhoef, P.C. Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiau, W.L.; Chau, P.Y.K. Does altruism matter on online group buying? Perspectives from egotistic and altruistic motivation. Inf. Technol. People 2015, 28, 677–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engel, J.F.; Blackwell, R.D.; Miniard, P.W. Consumer Behavior; Dryden Press: Hinsdale, IL, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Hanks, L.; Line, N.; Dogru, T.; Lu, L. Saving Local Restaurants: The Impact of Altruism, Self-Enhancement, and Affiliation on Restaurant Customers’ EWOM Behavior. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2022, 48, 301–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Kim, H.J. Positive and negative eWOM motivations and hotel customers’ eWOM behavior: Does personality matter? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 75, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanje, P.; Charles, G.; Tumsifu, E.; Mossberg, L.; Andersson, T. Customer engagement and eWOM in tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2020, 3, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litvin, S.W.; Goldsmith, R.E.; Pan, B. A retrospective view of electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, Y.Y.Y.; Ngai, E.W.T. Conceptualising electronic word of mouth activity. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2011, 29, 488–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossmann, A.; Ranjan, K.R.; Sugathan, P. Drivers of user engagement in eWoM communication. J. Serv. Mark. 2016, 30, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huete-Alcocer, N. A literature review of word of mouth and electronic word of mouth: Implications for consumer behavior. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 271126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, C.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Kang, Y. Factors Influencing eWOM Effects: Using Experience, Credibility, and Susceptibility. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2011, 1, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Lerman, D. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. J. Interact. Mark. 2007, 21, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O.; Rabjohn, N. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Res. 2008, 18, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santo, P.E.; Marques, A.M.A. Determinants of the online purchase intention: Hedonic motivations, prices, information and trust. Balt. J. Manag. 2022, 17, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tata, S.V.; Prashar, S.; Parsad, C. Intention to write reviews: Influence of personality traits, attitude and motivational factors. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2021, 23, 218–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCall, M.; Bruneau, C.L. Value, Quality, and Price Knowledge as Predictors of Restaurant Price Sensitivity. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2010, 13, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos Hablando de Millennials. I.N.E.C. Recuperado de. 2017. Available online: http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/web-inec/Inforgrafias-INEC/2017/millenials.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2024).
- Codagnone, C.; Cruz, P.; Maya-Jariego, I. Digital Media, Identity and Quality of Life of a Local Ecuadorian Community in Andalusia (SE Spain). In Quality of Life in Communities of Latin Countries; Tonon, G., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arribas-Urrutia, A.; Islas-Carmona, O.; Gutiérrez Cortés, F. From prosumers to observers: An emergent trend on the internet and among young ecuadorians. results from the world internet project study, Ecuador. Rev. Lat. Comun. Soc. 2019, 74, 969–996. [Google Scholar]
- Alvear, G. Digital tourism consumers an alternative for sustainability. Rev. Univ. Soc. 2017, 9, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
- Gvili, Y.; Levy, S. Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: The role of social capital. Online Inf. Rev. 2018, 42, 482–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, Y.K. Online Reviews of Restaurants: Expectation-Confirmation Theory. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2020, 21, 582–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DelVecchio, D. Moving beyond fit: The role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluations of brand reliability. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2000, 9, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheah, I.; Phau, I. Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2011, 29, 452–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, M.N. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam. Pract. 1996, 13, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ploll, U.; Stern, T. From diet to behaviour: Exploring environmental-and animal-conscious behaviour among Austrian vegetarians and vegans. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 3249–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bentler, P.M.; Chou, C.P. Practical Issues in Structural Modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 1987, 16, 78–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Alcázar Ponce, J.P. Actualización Julio 2020—Ecuador Estado Digital—Mentinno Insights. p. 1–15. Available online: https://blog.formaciongerencial.com/actualizacion-julio-2020-ecuador-estado-digital/ (accessed on 4 February 2024).
- Armstrong, J.S.; Overton, T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977, 14, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, J.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. Estimating Moderating Effects in PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM: Interaction Term Generation*Data Treatment. J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model. 2018, 2, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Danks, N.P.; Sharma, P.N.; Sarstedt, M. Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). J. Bus. Res. 2020, 113, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cepeda-Carrion, G.; Cegarra-Navarro, J.G.; Jimenez-Jimenez, D. The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. Br. J. Manag. 2012, 23, 110–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J. Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y.; Phillips, L.W. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Adm. Sci. Q. 1991, 36, 421–458. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393203 (accessed on 27 November 2023). [CrossRef]
- Kock, N.; Lynn, G.S. Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2012, 13, 546–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fassott, G.; Henseler, J.; Coelho, P.S. Testing moderating effects in PLS path models with composite variables. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 1887–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.P.; Gremler, D.D. Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes: An Integration of Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality. J. Serv. Res. 2002, 4, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magno, F.; Cassia, F.; Bonfanti, A.; Vigolo, V. The effects of altruistic and egoistic motivations on online reviews writing frequency. In Proceedings of the Excellence in Services International Conference, Paris, France, 30–31 August 2018; pp. 447–455. [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz, S.H. Normative Influences on Altruism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Berkowitz, L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; pp. 221–279. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260108603585 (accessed on 8 March 2024).
- Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, F.; Zhang, Z. “When you write review” matters: The interactive effect of prior online reviews and review temporal distance on consumers’ restaurant evaluation. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 31, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liat, C.B.; Mansori, S.; Chuan, G.C.; Imrie, B.C. Hotel Service Recovery and Service Quality: Influences of Corporate Image and Generational Differences in the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty. J. Glob. Mark. 2017, 30, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moliner-Velázquez, B.; Fuentes-Blasco, M.; Gil-Saura, I. The role of ICT, eWOM and guest characteristics in loyalty. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2019, 10, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahyuningsih; Nasution, H.; Yeni, Y.H.; Roostika, R. A comparative study of generations X, Y, Z in food purchasing behavior: The relationships among customer value, satisfaction, and Ewom. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2022, 9, 2105585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gender | Marital Status | ||
---|---|---|---|
Male | 42% | Single | 66% |
Female | 58% | Married | 23% |
Age | De facto union | 4% | |
Mean (±standard deviation) | 28.2 years old (±4.7) | Divorced | 6% |
Widower | 1% | ||
Employment situation | Monthly income | ||
Part time employment | 6% | less than USD 400 | 51% |
Full time employment | 32% | USD 401–500 | 10% |
Unemployed | 6% | USD 501–600 | 6% |
Self-employed | 12% | USD 601–700 | 4% |
Student | 41% | USD 701–800 | 4% |
Housewife | 3% | USD 801–900 | 4% |
USD 901–1000 | 6% | ||
more than USD 1000 | 15% |
Constructs | Indicators | Factor Loadings | (t-Stat) |
---|---|---|---|
Extroversion motivation (EM) α = 0.905 CR = 0.906 AVE = 0.779 | EM1: Because I can tell my experience to others about booking a restaurant | 0.862 *** | (42.405) |
EM2: Because I can express my satisfaction for having gone to a good restaurant | 0.904 *** | (61.148) | |
EM3: Because I can tell others about the success I’ve had reserving a restaurant | 0.904 *** | (52.858) | |
EM4: Because I like to say that I am satisfied with the service I have received in a restaurant | 0.861 *** | (36.745) | |
Social benefit motivation (SBM) α = 0.921 CR = 0.926 AVE = 0.809 | SBM1: Because I can meet nice people | 0.867 *** | (43.376) |
SBM2: Because I think others may like my comments. | 0.902 *** | (57.700) | |
SBM3: Because it’s nice to have a conversation with like-minded people. | 0.914 *** | (76.456) | |
SBM4: Because I feel identified with others who have had the same experience as me in a restaurant | 0.914 *** | (79.014) | |
Altruism motivations (AM) α = 0.902 CR = 0.904 AVE = 0.719 | AM1: Because I want to prevent others from having the same negative experiences as me in a restaurant. | 0.848 *** | (33.564) |
AM2: Because I want to warn others about bad restaurants | 0.861 *** | (41.816) | |
AM3: So that other people know my experience in a restaurant | 0.850 *** | (33.127) | |
AM4: Because I want to give others the opportunity to make a reservation at a good restaurant | 0.872 *** | (40.428) | |
AM5: Because I think good restaurants should be promoted | 0.805 *** | (27.406) | |
Behavior of sending EWOM (SB-EWOM) α = 0.776 CR = 0.776 AVE = 0.817 | SB-EWOM2: When I receive new information on social networks about products or services, I forward it to other people | 0.902 *** | (66.225) |
SB-EWOM3: When I receive information on social networks about products or services, I express my opinion about them | 0.905 *** | (67.676) | |
EWOM consultation behavior (CB-EWOM) | CB-EWOM1: I check online opinions and comments that people write when they visit a restaurant | -- | |
Age (Control) Gender (Control) | -- -- |
EM | SBM | AM | SB-EWOM | CB-EWOM | Age | Gender | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM | 0.883 | ||||||
SBM | 0.666 | 0.899 | |||||
AM | 0.803 | 0.664 | 0.848 | ||||
SB-EWOM | 0.611 | 0.504 | 0.500 | 0.904 | |||
CB-EWOM | 0.361 | 0.188 | 0.370 | 0.321 | --- | ||
Age | 0.001 | −0.014 | 0.017 | 0.026 | 0.017 | --- | |
Gender | −0.016 | −0.027 | −0.050 | 0.034 | −0.112 | −0.154 | --- |
EM | SBM | AM | SB-EWOM | CB-EWOM | Age | Gender | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EM | |||||||
SBM | 0.727 | ||||||
AM | 0.888 | 0.723 | |||||
SB-EWOM | 0.729 | 0.593 | 0.596 | ||||
CB-EWOM | 0.379 | 0.194 | 0.389 | 0.364 | |||
Age | 0.031 | 0.026 | 0.018 | 0.062 | 0.017 | ||
Gender | 0.017 | 0.029 | 0.053 | 0.041 | 0.112 | 0.154 |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Effects | β | t | β | t | β | t |
Control variables | ||||||
Age → SB-EWOM | 0.220 | 1.031 | 0.083 | 0.947 | 0.072 | 0.826 |
Gender → SB-EWOM | 0.179 | 1.025 | 0.133 | 1.511 | 0.124 | 1.398 |
Main effects | ||||||
EM → SB-EWOM | 0.485 *** | 6.676 | 0.516 *** | 6.746 | ||
SBM → SB-EWOM | 0.208 *** | 3.228 | 0.207 *** | 3.196 | ||
AM → SB-EWOM | −0.078 | 0.990 | −0.109 * | 1.409 | ||
CB-EWOM → SB-EWOM | 0.142 *** | 2.719 | 0.145 *** | 2.685 | ||
Interaction effects | ||||||
EMxCB-EWOM → SB-EWOM | 0.153 ** | 1.935 | ||||
SBMxCB-EWOM → SB-EWOM | −0.062 | 0.961 | ||||
AMxCB-EWOM → SB-EWOM | −0.162 ** | 1.929 | ||||
R2 (SB-EWOM) | 0.015 | 0.411 | 0.424 | |||
ΔR2 | 0.396 | 0.013 | ||||
SRMR | 0.050 | |||||
NFI | 0.856 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Haro-Sosa, G.; Moliner-Velázquez, B.; Gil-Saura, I.; Fuentes-Blasco, M. Motivations toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth Sending Behavior Regarding Restaurant Experiences in the Millennial Generation. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020052
Haro-Sosa G, Moliner-Velázquez B, Gil-Saura I, Fuentes-Blasco M. Motivations toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth Sending Behavior Regarding Restaurant Experiences in the Millennial Generation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2024; 19(2):993-1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020052
Chicago/Turabian StyleHaro-Sosa, Giovanny, Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez, Irene Gil-Saura, and Maria Fuentes-Blasco. 2024. "Motivations toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth Sending Behavior Regarding Restaurant Experiences in the Millennial Generation" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 2: 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020052
APA StyleHaro-Sosa, G., Moliner-Velázquez, B., Gil-Saura, I., & Fuentes-Blasco, M. (2024). Motivations toward Electronic Word-of-Mouth Sending Behavior Regarding Restaurant Experiences in the Millennial Generation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(2), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020052