Testimonials

Our experience with Limnological Review was extremely positive. The entire submission and peer-review process was handled with care and efficiency. We greatly valued the detailed and insightful feedback provided by the reviewers, which helped us enhance the clarity and scientific quality of our work. Throughout the process, the editorial staff were professional, responsive, and supportive, always maintaining clear and courteous communication, and I greatly appreciated it. We highly recommend this MDPI journal for publication.

Article in Limnological Review: Effect of Surrounding Detritus on Phragmites australis Litter Decomposition: Evidence from Laboratory Aquatic Microcosms

Less

Publishing our article in Limnological Review was a highly satisfying experience. The peer-review process, managed by the editorial staff and handled by expert reviewers, was rigorous, efficient and enriching. We received detailed, constructive comments that significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the professionalism, friendliness and timely communication from both the editorial team and the editor throughout every stage. The swift handling and high-quality editorial service reflect the excellent standards of Limnological Review and MDPI. We would confidently recommend this journal to authors seeking a transparent, accessible and scientifically rigorous publication.

Article in Limnological Review: A New Machine Learning Algorithm to Simulate the Outlet Flow in a Reservoir, Based on a Water Balance Model

Less

"I highly recommend publishing in Limnological Review, because I was very impressed with the handling of my manuscript by the Editorial Team at Limnological Review. I deeply appreciate the assistance and cooperation from the Editorial Staff. They were very kind and helpful. The reviewers' valuable comments were very useful and greatly improved my manuscript."

Article in Limnological Review: Annual and Seasonal Trends in Density, Biomass, and Secondary Production of Chironomid Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Middle Reaches of the Shinano River, Japan, 2015–2019

Less

"I had an excellent experience with the peer-review process. The reviewers provided insightful and constructive feedback that greatly improved the quality of our manuscript. The editorial team was professional, efficient, and highly responsive, ensuring a smooth and transparent process from submission to publication. I truly appreciate the rigorous yet supportive review, as well as the timely communication at every stage. I highly recommend this MDPI journal to fellow researchers seeking a fair and high-quality publication process."

Article in Limnological Review: Elemental Associations with Groundwater Nitrate in Northeastern Region of Saudi Arabia: Implications for Sustainable Water Management

Less

"I had a good experience working with Limnological Review. Reviewers provided several helpful comments. The turnaround was very fast, which makes it accessible for working researchers navigating tight timelines. Our editor was very responsive, and copyediting services were surprisingly thorough. I appreciate that the open access model means that others can easily see our work."

Article in Limnological Review: Maximum Potential Age of Pondcypress Hydrologic Indicators Using Diameter at Breast Height

Less