Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = wearable music instrument

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 3460 KiB  
Systematic Review
Using Wearable Sensors to Study Musical Experience: A Systematic Review
by Erica Volta and Nicola Di Stefano
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5783; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175783 - 5 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3465
Abstract
Over the last few decades, a growing number of studies have used wearable technologies, such as inertial and pressure sensors, to investigate various domains of music experience, from performance to education. In this paper, we systematically review this body of literature using the [...] Read more.
Over the last few decades, a growing number of studies have used wearable technologies, such as inertial and pressure sensors, to investigate various domains of music experience, from performance to education. In this paper, we systematically review this body of literature using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method. The initial search yielded a total of 359 records. After removing duplicates and screening for content, 23 records were deemed fully eligible for further analysis. Studies were grouped into four categories based on their main objective, namely performance-oriented systems, measuring physiological parameters, gesture recognition, and sensory mapping. The reviewed literature demonstrated the various ways in which wearable systems impact musical contexts, from the design of multi-sensory instruments to systems monitoring key learning parameters. Limitations also emerged, mostly related to the technology’s comfort and usability, and directions for future research in wearables and music are outlined. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 8159 KiB  
Article
Multichannel Sensorimotor Integration with a Dexterous Artificial Hand
by Moaed A. Abd and Erik D. Engeberg
Robotics 2024, 13(7), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13070097 - 30 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1639
Abstract
People use their hands for intricate tasks like playing musical instruments, employing myriad touch sensations to inform motor control. In contrast, current prosthetic hands lack comprehensive haptic feedback and exhibit rudimentary multitasking functionality. Limited research has explored the potential of upper limb amputees [...] Read more.
People use their hands for intricate tasks like playing musical instruments, employing myriad touch sensations to inform motor control. In contrast, current prosthetic hands lack comprehensive haptic feedback and exhibit rudimentary multitasking functionality. Limited research has explored the potential of upper limb amputees to feel, perceive, and respond to multiple channels of simultaneously activated haptic feedback to concurrently control the individual fingers of dexterous prosthetic hands. This study introduces a novel control architecture for three amputees and nine additional subjects to concurrently control individual fingers of an artificial hand using two channels of context-specific haptic feedback. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) recognize subjects’ electromyogram (EMG) patterns governing the artificial hand controller. ANNs also classify the directions objects slip across tactile sensors on the robotic fingertips, which are encoded via the vibration frequency of wearable vibrotactile actuators. Subjects implement control strategies with each finger simultaneously to prevent or permit slip as desired, achieving a 94.49% ± 8.79% overall success rate. Although no statistically significant difference exists between amputees’ and non-amputees’ success rates, amputees require more time to respond to simultaneous haptic feedback signals, suggesting a higher cognitive load. Nevertheless, amputees can accurately interpret multiple channels of nuanced haptic feedback to concurrently control individual robotic fingers, addressing the challenge of multitasking with dexterous prosthetic hands. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurorobotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 9471 KiB  
Article
A Touch on Musical Innovation: Exploring Wearables and Their Impact on New Interfaces for Musical Expression
by David Wexler, Joanne Yip, Ka-Po Lee, Xiaolu Li and Yiu-Hong Wong
Sensors 2024, 24(1), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010250 - 31 Dec 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4140
Abstract
This paper explores the innovative concept of using wearable technologies as a medium for musical expression. Special emphasis is placed on a unique wearable device equipped with motion, touch, and acceleration sensors, which can be used as a wrist strap, hand strap, or [...] Read more.
This paper explores the innovative concept of using wearable technologies as a medium for musical expression. Special emphasis is placed on a unique wearable device equipped with motion, touch, and acceleration sensors, which can be used as a wrist strap, hand strap, or surface drum pad. The aim is to create a new musical instrument that simplifies music learning and expression and makes them more intuitive. The wearable device contains 32 individual touch-sensitive pressure sensors, a nine-axis inertial-measurement-unit motion sensor, and various light-emitting diode and vibrational haptic-feedback components. The inclusion of tactile and intuitive features in the wearable device enhances the musical experience of users by enabling engaging interaction. Consequently, it is believed that this groundbreaking technology has significant potential to contribute to the field of music, providing musicians with a versatile and intuitive instrument that facilitates their creative expression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5207 KiB  
Article
Accessible Digital Musical Instruments—A Review of Musical Interfaces in Inclusive Music Practice
by Emma Frid
Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2019, 3(3), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3030057 - 26 Jul 2019
Cited by 130 | Viewed by 17039 | Correction
Abstract
Current advancements in music technology enable the creation of customized Digital Musical Instruments (DMIs). This paper presents a systematic review of Accessible Digital Musical Instruments (ADMIs) in inclusive music practice. History of research concerned with facilitating inclusion in music-making is outlined, and current [...] Read more.
Current advancements in music technology enable the creation of customized Digital Musical Instruments (DMIs). This paper presents a systematic review of Accessible Digital Musical Instruments (ADMIs) in inclusive music practice. History of research concerned with facilitating inclusion in music-making is outlined, and current state of developments and trends in the field are discussed. Although the use of music technology in music therapy contexts has attracted more attention in recent years, the topic has been relatively unexplored in Computer Music literature. This review investigates a total of 113 publications focusing on ADMIs. Based on the 83 instruments in this dataset, ten control interface types were identified: tangible controllers, touchless controllers, Brain–Computer Music Interfaces (BCMIs), adapted instruments, wearable controllers or prosthetic devices, mouth-operated controllers, audio controllers, gaze controllers, touchscreen controllers and mouse-controlled interfaces. The majority of the AMDIs were tangible or physical controllers. Although the haptic modality could potentially play an important role in musical interaction for many user groups, relatively few of the ADMIs (14.5%) incorporated vibrotactile feedback. Aspects judged to be important for successful ADMI design were instrument adaptability and customization, user participation, iterative prototyping, and interdisciplinary development teams. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2198 KiB  
Review
In-Situ Measurements in Microscale Gas Flows—Conventional Sensors or Something Else?
by Juergen J. Brandner
Micromachines 2019, 10(5), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10050292 - 29 Apr 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4155
Abstract
Within the last few decades miniaturization has a driving force in almost all areas of technology, leading to a tremendous intensification of systems and processes. Information technology provides now data density several orders of magnitude higher than a few years ago, and the [...] Read more.
Within the last few decades miniaturization has a driving force in almost all areas of technology, leading to a tremendous intensification of systems and processes. Information technology provides now data density several orders of magnitude higher than a few years ago, and the smartphone technology includes, as well the simple ability to communicate with others, features like internet, video and music streaming, but also implementation of the global positioning system, environment sensors or measurement systems for individual health. So-called wearables are everywhere, from the physio-parameter sensing wrist smart watch up to the measurement of heart rates by underwear. This trend holds also for gas flow applications, where complex flow arrangements and measurement systems formerly designed for a macro scale have been transferred into miniaturized versions. Thus, those systems took advantage of the increased surface to volume ratio as well as of the improved heat and mass transfer behavior of miniaturized equipment. In accordance, disadvantages like gas flow mal-distribution on parallelized mini- or micro tubes or channels as well as increased pressure losses due to the minimized hydraulic diameters and an increased roughness-to-dimension ratio have to be taken into account. Furthermore, major problems are arising for measurement and control to be implemented for in-situ and/or in-operando measurements. Currently, correlated measurements are widely discussed to obtain a more comprehensive view to a process by using a broad variety of measurement techniques complementing each other. Techniques for correlated measurements may include commonly used techniques like thermocouples or pressure sensors as well as more complex systems like gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, infrared or ultraviolet spectroscopy and many others. Some of these techniques can be miniaturized, some of them cannot yet. Those should, nevertheless, be able to conduct measurements at the same location and the same time, preferably in-situ and in-operando. Therefore, combinations of measurement instruments might be necessary, which will provide complementary techniques for accessing local process information. A recently more intensively discussed additional possibility is the application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) systems, which might be useful in combination with other, more conventional measurement techniques. NMR is currently undergoing a tremendous change from large-scale to benchtop measurement systems, and it will most likely be further miniaturized. NMR allows a multitude of different measurements, which are normally covered by several instruments. Additionally, NMR can be combined very well with other measurement equipment to perform correlative in-situ and in-operando measurements. Such combinations of several instruments would allow us to retrieve an “information cloud” of a process. This paper will present a view of some common measurement techniques and the difficulties of applying them on one hand in a miniaturized scale, and on the other hand in a correlative mode. Basic suggestions to achieve the above-mentioned objective by a combination of different methods including NMR will be given. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Flows in Microsystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop