Search Results (432)

Furunculosis caused by Aeromonas salmonicida poses a significant challenge to the sustainable production of maraena whitefish (Coregonus maraena). This case report outlines a multi-year disease management strategy at a European whitefish facility with two production departments, each specialising in different life-cycle stages. Recurrent outbreaks of A. salmonicida necessitated the development of effective vaccination protocols. Herd-specific immersion vaccines failed to confer protection, while injectable formulations with plant-based adjuvants caused severe adverse reactions and mortality rates exceeding 30%. In contrast, the bivalent vaccine Alpha Ject 3000, containing inactivated A. salmonicida and Vibrio anguillarum with a mineral oil adjuvant, yielded high tolerability and durable protection in over one million whitefish. Post-vaccination mortality remained low (3.3%), aligning with industry benchmarks, and furunculosis-related losses were fully prevented in both departments. Transcriptomic profiling of immune-relevant tissues revealed distinct gene expression signatures depending on vaccine type and time post-vaccination. Both the herd-specific vaccine and Alpha Ject 3000 induced the expression of immunoglobulin and inflammatory markers in the spleen, contrasted by reduced immunoglobulin transcript levels in the gills and head kidney together with the downregulated expression of B-cell markers. These results demonstrate that an optimised injectable vaccination strategy can significantly improve health outcomes and disease resilience in maraena whitefish aquaculture. Full article

Background/objectives: This was a post hoc analysis of safety data across the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine clinical trial development program. Methods: Data from eight clinical trials in 46,913 immunocompetent adults who received RSVpreF or placebo were analyzed. Local reactions and systemic events were assessed among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 9517); adverse events (AEs) among pregnant and non-pregnant 18–59-year-olds (n = 9238); and vaccine-related AEs among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 39,314). Post-marketing data in non-pregnant adults were considered. Results: Local reactions and systemic events were reported more frequently in RSVpreF versus placebo recipients; injection site pain was the most common local reaction (RSVpreF, 18.9%; placebo, 7.4%), and fatigue (23.5%; 18.4%) and headache (19.5%; 15.0%) were the most common systemic events. Percentages of AEs within 1 month after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF, 12.8%; placebo, 13.1%); severe AEs were reported in ≤1.5% of participants. Differences in percentages of individuals reporting vaccine-related AEs between the RSVpreF and placebo groups were <0.2% for all related AEs. Serious AEs throughout the study were reported in ≤14.0% (RSVpreF, 12.6%; placebo, 14.0%). No atrial fibrillation, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute polyneuropathy cases were reported. The AE data from post-marketing data sources were consistent with the safety profile from the clinical trial program, with no new safety concerns. Conclusions: Integrated data demonstrated that RSVpreF was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile in non-pregnant and pregnant adults. Ongoing surveillance through real-world use and clinical trial experience continue to support the safety profile of RSVpreF. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03529773/NCT04071158/NCT04785612/NCT05035212/NCT05096208/NCT05842967/NCT04032093/NCT04424316. Full article

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically assess Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) among children following administration of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (Cervarix^®) included in the Dutch National Immunization Program (NIP) and to characterize the pattern and recurrence risk of AEFI after HPV revaccination. Methods: A longitudinal cohort event monitoring study, using patient-reported outcomes was used among recipients of the HPV vaccine at 10 years of age. Data were available for 3063 children following the first HPV vaccination and for 2209 children following the second HPV vaccination. Results: The most commonly reported AEFI following HPV vaccination were injection site reactions—reported by 46.5% of participants after the first dose and 31.9% after the second dose—followed by headache (8.2% and 3.9%, respectively) and joint pain (4.5% and 3.7%, respectively). Participants who received both HPV vaccine doses reported more AEFI after the first dose than after the second. Among girls, 61.2% reported at least one AEFI following the first dose, compared to 44.2% after the second dose. For boys, these percentages were 55.3% and 38.5%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002). For some AEFI, such as injection site reactions, there appears to be a potential increased risk of recurrence following the second dose. Conclusions: This prospective longitudinal cohort event monitoring study showed that AEFI were more frequent after the first HPV dose and more frequent for girls compared to boys. An increased risk of recurrence was seen for AEFI, such as injection site reactions and headache. Furthermore, this study provides insight into the course of AEFI and the extent to which children were affected by these symptoms based on real-world data. Full article

The mRNA vaccine has protected humans from the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has taken the lead in reversing the epidemic efficiently. However, the Centre of Disease Control (CDC) reported and raised the alarm of allergic or acute inflammatory adverse reactions after vaccination with mRNA-LNP vaccines. Meanwhile, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has added four black-box warnings in the instructions for mRNA-LNP vaccines. Numerous studies have proven that the observance of side effects after vaccination is indeed positively correlated to the level of anti-PEG antibodies (IgM or IgG), which are enhanced by PEGylated preparations like LNP vaccine and environmental exposure. After literature research and review in the past two decades, it was found that the many clinical trial failures (BIND-014, RB006 fell in phase II) of PEG modified delivery system or PEGylated drug were related to the high expression of anti-PEG IgM and IgG. In the background of shooting multiple mRNA-LNP vaccines in billions of people around the world in the past three years, the level of anti-PEG antibodies in the population may have significantly increased, which brings potential risks for PEG-modified drug development and clinical safety. This review summarizes the experience of using mRNA-LNP vaccines from the mechanism of the anti-PEG antibodies generation, detection methods, clinical failure cases of PEG-containing products, harm analysis of abuse of PEGylation, and alternatives. In light of the increasing prevalence of anti-PEG antibodies in the population and the need to avoid secondary injuries, this review article holds greater significance by offering insights for drug developers. It suggests avoiding the use of PEG excipients when designing PEGylated drugs or PEG-modified nano-formulations and provides references for strategies such as utilizing PEG-free or alternative excipients. Full article

Background: Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is major transboundary disease affecting cattle and water buffaloes, indirectly causing huge socio-economic losses. Following its first outbreak in India in 2019, the heterologous Goatpox (Uttarkashi strain) vaccine mitigated LSD. Objective: Due to limited data on the spatiotemporal distribution of the disease, this study investigates its dynamics and presents findings from a field study conducted in Maharashtra, India. This study evaluates the safety, immunogenicity, and duration of immunity provided by a heterologous vaccine. Additionally, it examines post-vaccination responses in relation to factors such as age, gender, and breed. Methods: This study employed spatiotemporal analysis of lumpy skin disease (LSD) outbreaks from 2020 to 2024 using GeoDa (v1.22), incorporating Moran’s I and Getis-Ord Gi* statistics to identify spatial clustering patterns. A randomized field trial was conducted to evaluate vaccine safety and immunogenicity in 657 cattle across seven districts. Humoral immune responses were assessed using the serum neutralization test (SNT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while cell-mediated immunity was evaluated via Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) ELISA. For sero-monitoring, a total of 1925 serum samples from 22 districts were analyzed. Additionally, statistical analyses (n = 1925), including the Kappa Index, ANOVA, and logistic regression, were performed using SPSS v27 to investigate the influence of factors such as age, sex, and breed (significance level: p < 0.05). Results: LSD exhibited significant spatial clustering across Maharashtra. The Goatpox vaccine was 100% safe, with no adverse reactions. Protective antibody titers (≥1:8) were observed in 96.9% of vaccinated cattle by 14–21 days post-vaccination (dpv), peaking at 60 dpv before declining at 150 dpv. The cell-mediated immune response peaked at 28 dpv. Clinical monitoring for one year showed that only 2% of vaccinated cattle developed mild LSD symptoms after nine months, with no mortality. At six months post-vaccination, seroconversion was 69.7%, with breed significantly influencing seropositivity. Conclusions: This study confirms the Goatpox vaccine’s safety and strong immunogenicity in cattle, marking its first large-scale evaluation in the Indian subcontinent. Further research is needed to assess long-term immunity and protection against virulent LSD strains. Full article

Background/Objectives: Q-VAX vaccine, approved in Australia, prevents Q fever. However, individuals with prior Coxiella burnetii (Cb) infection have an increased risk of adverse reactions, requiring pre-vaccination screening by an intradermal hypersensitivity skin test for cell-mediated immune memory and a serological assay for anti-Cb antibodies. The week-long interval for skin test assessment limits efficient vaccination. This study evaluated a standardized interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) as a potential skin test alternative. Methods: Immune assays were compared in Australian populations with different incidences of prior Cb exposure. Cell-mediated immunity was assessed by the Q-VAX skin test and IGRA. Serological status was evaluated with established diagnostic assays. Hypothetical vaccine eligibility decisions using combined IGRA and serology results were compared with actual clinical decisions made using current guidelines. Results: All tests performed better in detecting prior infection than in detecting prior vaccination. Only the IGRA identified all individuals with a known history of Q fever. Agreement between the skin test and IGRA was limited. Moderate agreement was observed between hypothetical vaccine eligibility determinations based on IGRA plus serology results and actual clinical decisions. IGRA-positive but serology- and skin test-negative individuals received Q-VAX without clinically significant side effects, suggesting that elevated IGRA responses alone are not predictive of susceptibility to vaccine reactogenicity. Conclusions: The IGRA is not yet a suitable skin test replacement when assessing eligibility for Q fever vaccination, despite the significant limitations of the latter. We offer recommendations for designing future studies that might allow the development of appropriate guidelines for IGRA use in vaccine eligibility screening. Full article

Background: The MVA-BN vaccine is considered effective for preventing mpox in key populations, based on observational studies, though no randomized trials have yet confirmed its effectiveness. Observational studies published to date rely on retrospective analyses of routine data, often missing information on relevant risk factors for mpox. Methods: Multi-country target trial emulation study with prospective data collection. Between 1 September 2022 and 15 June 2023, we recruited individuals eligible for mpox vaccination based on clinical history and exposure behaviors via healthcare centers and social venues in Spain, Peru, Panama, and Chile. Vaccinated individuals were paired with unvaccinated counterparts matched by mpox risk factors, country, recruitment date, and age. Follow-up continued via periodic surveys until 31 March 2024. The primary endpoint was symptomatic mpox occurrence ≥14 days post-vaccination. Results: The primary analysis included 1028 individuals (514 vaccinated, 514 unvaccinated) with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months (IQR 4.7–13.7). Mpox occurred in eight participants (0.8%): three vaccinated and five unvaccinated (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.21–1.70). Adverse reactions were reported by 731 (49.6%) participants, predominantly skin reactions (703/1475; 47.7%), while systemic reactions occurred in 107 (7.3%). Long-lasting erythema at the injection site was reported in 450/1058 (42.5%) participants, persisting >6 months in 107 of them (23.8%). Conclusions: The low incidence of mpox during the study period resulted in a limited number of endpoint events, precluding robust conclusions on the efficacy of the MVA-BN vaccine as pre-exposure prevention for mpox. However, our analysis, which accounted for key confounders such as exposure behaviors, yielded results consistent with previous studies suggesting the effectiveness of the vaccine in the mpox setting. Full article

Background: Influenza is an acute viral disease that primarily affects the airways. It is caused by influenza A and B—RNA viruses. The disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The prevention of influenza includes chemoprophylaxis and vaccination, which are the primary preventive measures against influenza infection and should be highly considered by everyone during influenza season. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase until September 2024. The review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Eventually, a total of 20 publications were included in the final analysis of this systematic review. While general awareness of influenza was moderate, detailed understanding of complications and vaccine safety was frequently lacking. Misconceptions—such as fears of fetal harm and confusion between antiviral and antibiotic treatments—were widespread. Vaccine uptake was generally low but strongly correlated with receiving a healthcare provider recommendation. Willingness to vaccinate was higher in settings where participants were educated during the study process, indicating a crucial role of health communication. Discussion: According to the reviewed literature, the reluctance to receive maternal vaccination often stems primarily from fears or concerns about adverse reactions or misconceptions about the vaccine’s effectiveness, as well as the absence of a physician’s recommendation. Misconceptions regarding vaccine safety, limited understanding of influenza severity, and a lack of clear communication from healthcare professionals are key contributors to low vaccination uptake. Importantly, multiple studies confirmed that recommendation by a trusted healthcare provider significantly increases vaccine acceptance. Conclusions: These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted educational strategies, improved antenatal counseling, and systems-level support to ensure that maternal influenza vaccination becomes a standard and trusted component of prenatal care worldwide. Full article

Background: Prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination substantially alleviates cervical cancer burden. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant nonavalent HPV vaccine. Methods: A dose-escalating phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in Sheyang County, Jiangsu Province, China. Each participant received either the test vaccine or the control vaccine (Gardasil 9) following a 0/2/6-month schedule. Adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days after vaccination, adverse events (AEs) within 30 days, and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study were recorded. Blood parameters were measured before and 3 days after each dose. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against nine HPV types were analyzed at months 0, 3, and 7. Results: A total of 160 women aged 18–45 years were enrolled, and 155 participants completed the full vaccination regimen. Within 7 days following vaccination, the incidence of ARs ranged from 56.67% to 90.00%, with the low-dose group showing a significantly higher rate than the control group (p = 0.004). Most AEs were mild or moderate, and no vaccine-related SAEs occurred. No significant differences were observed among the four groups regarding the incidence of abnormal laboratory findings. Seroconversion rates for nAbs and IgG against nine HPV types exceeded 97.92% following three doses. High levels of nAbs and IgG were observed at months 3 and 7, with geometric mean titers (GMTs) showing further increases by month 7. Conclusions: This new recombinant nonavalent HPV vaccine exhibits good tolerability and strong immunogenicity among women aged 18–45 years, supporting further efficacy studies in larger populations. Full article

Background: Influenza is a serious contagious disease caused by influenza virus. It is particularly dangerous for children, potentially leading to severe and even fatal complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of two candidate quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines in children aged 6–35 months. Methods: The subjects were randomly divided into three groups at a 1:1:1 ratio and received the corresponding vaccines: QIV-Sub-HD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, High Dose), QIV-Sub-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Subunit Vaccine, Low Dose) and QIV-Split-LD (Quadrivalent Influenza Split-Virion Vaccine, Low Dose). Adverse events were recorded at 30 min, 0–7 days and 8–28 and 30 days after each dose of immunization. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected and reported within 6 months after the full vaccination. Blood samples were collected before the first dose and on 28 days, 3 months and 6 months after full vaccination for antibody detection to evaluate the immunogenicity and duration of immune responses. Results: The results showed that the relative and absolute criteria met the goals set by the clinical trial protocol, indicating that both vaccines are immunogenic. From the first dose to 30 days after full vaccination, the total incidence of adverse reactions in the QIV-Sub-HD, QIV-Sub-LD and QIV-Split-LD groups was 29.64%, 33.33% and 29.64%, respectively. The main symptoms were fever, cough, diarrhea and vomiting. No new safety concerns were identified. Conclusions: The quadrivalent influenza subunit vaccines candidate, manufactured by Ab&B Bio-tech Co., Ltd. JS., are safe and immunogenic in children aged 6–35 months. Full article

Objective: To assess changes in disease activity in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients on various disease-modifying-drugs, as well as immunogenicity, safety and clinical tolerability following combined tetanus- and diphtheria-vaccination. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised real-world observational study at specialised outpatient MS care centres in Germany. We enrolled multiple sclerosis patients receiving a combined tetanus- and diphtheria-vaccination who had a stable MS-treatment regimen for at least six months and had an indication for this vaccination. Serum samples were obtained before and four weeks after vaccination for specific antibody response. Antibody concentrations against vaccine antigens were measured in duplicate via ELISA. Subjects were followed for one year after immunisation. MS disease activity (EDSS and relapse rates) was evaluated at follow-up visits. Local and systemic adverse events were registered four weeks after vaccination. Results: In total, 72 MS patients received tetanus and diphtheria vaccination. The annualised relapse rates in the year after vaccination were comparable to the year before vaccination (0.39 vs. 0.37). During the study period, the EDSS score did not change significantly. The score was 2.0 and 2.2 in the two years prior to vaccination and 2.5 in the year following vaccination. No subjects experienced severe adverse events. However, 14 (19.4%) had local adverse events, and 10 (13.9%) had systemic reactions. Following vaccination, all subjects had protective antibody titres against tetanus- and diphtheria-toxoid. Geometric mean antibody titres of tetanus toxoid antibodies increased from 0.64 IU/mL to 2.23 IU/mL (p < 0.0001) and of diphtheria toxoid antibodies from 0.1 IU/mL to 0.45 IU/mL (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Tetanus- and diphtheria vaccination proved to be safe and effective in MS patients in a real-world situation. Full article

Background: Food allergy (FA) poses a major global health issue due to the increasing prevalence and lack of effective prevention strategies. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has emerged as a disease-modifying therapy for FA. However, due to long-term treatment duration and unexpected adverse reactions, only a minority of patients benefit from AIT. Therefore, effective prophylactic interventions are urgently needed for FA patients. Methods: In this proof-of-concept study, using a well-established mRNA platform, we developed mRNA vaccine candidates encoding for the major egg white allergen Gal d2 and comprehensively evaluated their prophylactic efficacy against anaphylaxis in a Gal d2-induced allergic mouse model. Results: Two vaccine formulations, Gal d2 mRNA vaccine and Gal d2-IL-10 mRNA vaccine, both demonstrated potent ability in inducing allergen-specific IgG and Th1-type T cells. Importantly, the two vaccine formulations showed promise in preventing the onset of allergic disease, which is indicated by prevention of body temperature decline during anaphylaxis. Conclusions: We provided preliminary proof-of-concept evidence showing that the mRNA platform is unique and holds promise for the development of anti-allergy vaccines. This is largely attributed to the capacities of mRNA vaccines in eliciting an allergen-blocking antibody, shifting Th2 towards Th1 immunity, as well as in generating peripheral tolerance. However, further investigations are required to better understand the mode of action. Full article

Objectives: Our objectives were to evaluate the safety of the simultaneous vaccination of Japanese encephalitis attenuated live vaccine (JEV-L) and measles, mumps, and rubella combined attenuated live vaccine (MMR) in children and to provide a reference for the implementation of the strategy of simultaneous vaccination with the two vaccines. Methods: The data of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and vaccination for JEV-L and MMR from 2020 to 2023 were extracted through the Guangdong Province Vaccine Distribution and Vaccination Management Information System and the Chinese National AEFI Information System (CNAEFIS). The inclusion criteria were that children were born after 1 October 2019, and received the first dose of JEV-L or MMR after 1 June 2020, in accordance with the starting age for vaccination (8 months). The study used the number of vaccine doses as the denominator to calculate and compare the reporting rates of cases and calculated the relative risk (RR) of adverse reactions and the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: In Guangzhou, a total of 214,238 doses of JEV-L were administered to children. JEV-L and MMR were co-administered in 464,009 doses, and MMR was administered separately in 241,150 doses. The overall reporting incidence rates of AEFI (per 100,000 doses) for JEV-L, the simultaneous vaccination group, and MMR were 11.20, 53.02, and 60.96, respectively. Among children aged 8 months in Guangzhou, 57.98% (463,512/799,423) received the simultaneous administration of JEV-L and MMR. In the reported AEFI events, general reactions accounted for 87.50% in the JEV-L group, 88.21% in the simultaneous vaccination group, and 89.80% in the MMR separate group. The incidence rates of common adverse reactions were 9.80, 46.7, and 54.74, respectively. The incidence rates of rare adverse reactions were 0.93, 3.88, and 2.90, respectively. The reporting incidence rates of fever ≥38.6 °C after vaccination were 4.20, 16.16, and 17.83 for the JEV-L separate group, simultaneous vaccination group, and MMR separate group, respectively. There was a significant difference between the simultaneous vaccination group and the JEV-L separate group (RR = 3.848, 95% CI = 1.927, 7.683), while no significant difference was found compared with the MMR separate group (RR = 0.906, 95% CI = 0.623, 1.318). The simultaneous vaccination group showed no significant differences in the reporting incidence rates of local redness and induration compared with the two separate vaccination groups (RR = 1.385, 95% CI = 0.144, 13.315; RR = 0.390, 95% CI = 0.087, 1.743; RR = 0.520, 95% CI = 0.033, 8.314). No significant differences were found in the incidence rates of rare adverse reactions such as maculopapular rash, urticaria, and thrombocytopenic purpura. Conclusions: The AEFI reporting incidence rate for the first dose of the simultaneous vaccination of JEV-L and MMR in 8-month-old children in Guangzhou is between the rates of the two separate groups. Compared with the MMR separate group, the simultaneous vaccination group does not increase the risk of adverse reactions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Circulating influenza strains antigenically differing from vaccine antigens increase disease burden by decreasing vaccine efficacy. Nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) influenza vaccines may facilitate rapid production allowing later antigen selection and improved antigenic similarity compared to circulating strains. We studied different influenza modRNA vaccine (IRV) formulations and dose levels. Methods: This phase 1/2 randomized study evaluated IRV safety/tolerability and immunogenicity in healthy 18- through 85-year-olds. Based on safety and immunogenicity for different IRV doses, schedules, and valencies versus the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV; Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) in phase 1 (65–85-year-olds), quadrivalent IRV (qIRV) was further evaluated in 65- through 85-year-olds and 18- through 64-year-olds in phase 2, leading to phase 3 dose selection. Results: Phase 1 (65–85-year-olds) safety/tolerability and immunogenicity findings supported qIRV 30-µg and 60-µg phase 2 assessment (18–85-year-olds, N = 610). qIRV was well tolerated. Injection site pain was the most frequently reported local reaction. Reactogenicity event incidences ≤ 7 days postvaccination for qIRV were generally higher versus QIV, observed more frequently in 18- through 64-year-olds than 65- through 85-year-olds, and showed dose-related trends (60 μg > 30 μg). qIRV and QIV adverse event profiles in 65- through 85-year-olds were similar. There were higher postvaccination hemagglutination inhibition assay geometric mean titers and fold rises and seroconversion rates observed with qIRV versus QIV for A strains, with no consistent pattern for B strains. Cell-mediated immune responses to qIRV by Day 7 showed overall higher T-cell responses against all strains versus QIV. Antibody and cell-mediated immune responses showed comparable trends across qIRV doses in 18- through 85-year-olds; a dose-related pattern was observed in 65- through 85-year-olds (60 μg > 30 μg). Conclusions: Phase 3 investigations of qIRV 60 µg in older adults and qIRV 30 µg in younger adults are warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05052697). Full article

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant and breastfeeding women and identify associated demographic and clinical factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, from November 2021 to March 2022. A total of 1204 participants, including 991 pregnant women beyond 13 weeks of gestation and 213 breastfeeding women, were recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire designed to capture demographic information and adverse reactions occurring within seven to 28 days post-vaccination. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and logistic regression, were performed using Stata 16.0, with the significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The most common adverse reactions were localized pain at the injection site (26.2%), dizziness and fatigue (19.2%), and fever below 39 °C (29.1%). Severe adverse reactions, such as a tight throat, coma, and premature birth, were rare. A multivariate analysis identified the significant factors associated with the adverse reactions, including age (aOR = 2.04 for participants aged 36–40 years), occupation (lower odds for farmers and business professionals), urban residency (aOR = 0.64), and a history of allergies (aOR = 1.59). Education level, number of children, and gestational age were not significantly associated with adverse events. Conclusions: The findings support the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant and breastfeeding women, with most of the adverse reactions being mild and self-limiting. Full article