Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (59)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = unicompartmental

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 213 KiB  
Article
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes
by Ali Said Nazlıgül, Şahan Güven, Yasin Erdoğan, Ahmet Fırat, Metin Doğan and Mustafa Akkaya
Antibiotics 2025, 14(6), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060585 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare the causative microorganisms and surgical treatment outcomes in PJI cases following UKA and TKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients (71 TKA and 11 UKA) who underwent surgical treatment for PJI between January 2017 and May 2024. PJI was diagnosed based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Treatment strategies included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Microbiological data were extracted from intraoperative cultures. Fisher’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Gram-positive organisms, primarily Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were isolated in all UKA PJIs. In contrast, the TKA group demonstrated greater microbial diversity, including Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial infections, and a higher rate of culture-negative cases (33.8% vs. 18.2%). DAIR was performed more frequently in UKA cases (72.7% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.002). Recurrence rates following DAIR were similar in both groups (12.5% in UKA, 20.0% in TKA, p = 1.000). Two-stage revision resulted in no recurrence in UKA and a 9.8% recurrence rate in TKA patients. Conclusions: UKA PJIs appear to be microbiologically less complex than TKA PJI cases, with Gram-positive organisms predominating. Despite these differences, the outcomes of surgical treatment—both DAIR and two-stage revision—were comparable between groups. Standard PJI treatment principles may be applicable to both arthroplasty types; however, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article
14 pages, 601 KiB  
Article
Preoperative Central Sensitization Worsens Pain and Dissatisfaction Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
by Man-Soo Kim, Keun-Young Choi and Yong In
Medicina 2025, 61(5), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050912 - 18 May 2025
Viewed by 473
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Central sensitization (CS) has been identified as a significant factor influencing persistent pain and dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains largely unexplored. Unlike TKA, UKA preserves most native knee structures, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Central sensitization (CS) has been identified as a significant factor influencing persistent pain and dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its effect on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains largely unexplored. Unlike TKA, UKA preserves most native knee structures, with less bone cut, leading to different postoperative pain mechanisms. Nevertheless, the revision rate for unexplained pain following UKA is higher than after TKA. This study investigates the influence of preoperative CS on pain and dissatisfaction after UKA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 121 patients who underwent primary UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were screened for CS preoperatively using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into a CS group (CSI ≥ 40; n = 26) and a non-CS group (CSI < 40; n = 95). Clinical outcomes, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and patient satisfaction, were assessed at the 2-year postoperative follow-up visit. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for postoperative dissatisfaction. Results: The CS group reported significantly worse postoperative WOMAC pain, function, and total scores than the non-CS group (all p < 0.05). FJS was also significantly worse in the CS group than in the non-CS group (64.4 vs. 72.7, respectively, p = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the CS group than in the non-CS group (65.4% vs. 95.8%, respectively, p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with a CSI score ≥ 40 had an 11.349-fold increased likelihood of dissatisfaction after UKA (95% CI: 2.315–55.626, p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of recognizing CS as a critical determinant of postoperative pain and functional recovery following UKA. Patients with high CSI scores experience greater pain, increased joint awareness, and overall poorer satisfaction despite technically successful surgeries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutting-Edge Concepts in Knee Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 929 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Excellent Clinical Outcomes, High Survivorship, and Low Osteoarthritis Progression in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up
by Matteo Marullo, Stefano Petrillo, Antonio Russo and Sergio Romagnoli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2492; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072492 - 6 Apr 2025
Viewed by 756
Abstract
Background: The literature on the long-term outcomes of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains limited due to the lower prevalence of lateral osteoarthritis (OA) and the technical challenges of the procedure. This study aimed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, and [...] Read more.
Background: The literature on the long-term outcomes of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains limited due to the lower prevalence of lateral osteoarthritis (OA) and the technical challenges of the procedure. This study aimed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, and OA progression in patients undergoing lateral UKA with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 96 lateral UKAs from 2001 to 2013 using a cemented, fixed-bearing implant. Patients with at least 10 years of follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes were measured using range of motion (ROM), a pain visual analog scale (VAS), Knee Society Scores (KSSs), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Implant survivorship was assessed using a Kaplan–Meier analysis, while OA progression in the medial compartment was evaluated radiographically. Results: At a mean follow-up of 14.5 years, implant survivorship was 94.7%, with five revisions primarily due to OA progression. Significant improvements were observed in ROM, VAS, and KSS (p < 0.01). An increase in the Kellgren–Lawrence grade in the medial compartment was reported in 47.9% of patients. Conclusions: Lateral UKA provides excellent long-term outcomes, demonstrating high survivorship, significant functional improvement, and high patient satisfaction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Total Knee Arthroplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1317 KiB  
Article
Patients with Robotic Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (mUKA) Regain Their Preoperative Activity Level Two Weeks Earlier Compared to Robotic Arm-Assisted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (rKA-TKA)
by Carlo Theus-Steinmann, Sietske Witvoet-Braam, Kim Huber, Sarah Calliess, Bernhard Christen and Tilman Calliess
Sensors 2025, 25(6), 1668; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25061668 - 8 Mar 2025
Viewed by 948
Abstract
Background: This study compared the early rehabilitation progress of patients undergoing robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) and robotic-assisted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA), focusing on daily activity by step-count measurements. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 88 patients [...] Read more.
Background: This study compared the early rehabilitation progress of patients undergoing robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) and robotic-assisted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA), focusing on daily activity by step-count measurements. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 88 patients (53 rKA-TKA and 35 mUKA) was conducted. Patients wore Garmin Vivofit® 4 activity trackers pre and postoperatively. Daily step counts were analyzed, and clinical outcomes were assessed using various scores, including the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Results: Preoperative median daily step counts were comparable between groups (rKA-TKA: 3988 and mUKA: 4315; p = 0.128). At 6 and 7 weeks post-surgery, the mUKA group showed significantly higher median step counts (3741 and 4730) compared to the rKA-TKA group (2370 and 2910), with p-values of 0.015 and 0.048, respectively. The mUKA group reached 86.7% of their preoperative step count at week 6 and 100% at week 7, while the rKA-TKA group achieved 59.4% and 73%, respectively. Both groups surpassed their preoperative activity levels by week 9. Clinical outcomes at 2 months and 1 year post-surgery showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusions: While both the mUKA and rKA-TKA patients achieved their preoperative daily activity levels within nine weeks post-surgery, the mUKA patients reached this milestone approximately two weeks earlier. This study demonstrates a clinical benefit of mUKA in terms of faster postoperative remobilization, even when compared to kinematically aligned robotic-assisted TKA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Sensors for Gait and Motion Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 600 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Functional Outcomes, Survivorship and Complications of Hypoallergenic Fixed-Bearing Medial and Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
by Federico D'Amario, Umberto Vitale, Ferdinando De Dona, Luca Ruosi, Alessandro Cofone and Mattia Loppini
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1748; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051748 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 953
Abstract
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable treatment option for patients with isolated knee osteoarthritis. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of the JII UK (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) hypoallergenic, fixed-bearing UKA implant in a medium cohort of patients undergoing [...] Read more.
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable treatment option for patients with isolated knee osteoarthritis. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of the JII UK (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) hypoallergenic, fixed-bearing UKA implant in a medium cohort of patients undergoing both medial and lateral procedures with a short-term follow-up. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 257 consecutive patients who underwent primary UKA using the JII UK implant between December 2020 and December 2022. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity Score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), and satisfaction. Survivorship analysis was performed, and complications were recorded. Results: At the 2-year follow-up, the implant survival rate was 99.61%. Statistical significant improvements were observed in all clinical scores, with high patient satisfaction. The mean UCLA Activity Score increased from 4.53 preoperatively to 7.3 at 24 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrates promising short-term clinical outcomes for the hypoallergenic fixed-bearing medial and lateral UKA implant, with high patient satisfaction and a low complication rate. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 5378 KiB  
Interesting Images
Ultrasound Examination for Cement Extrusion After Uni-Compartmental Knee Replacement
by Peter Kam-To Siu, Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar and Ke-Vin Chang
Diagnostics 2025, 15(1), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15010112 - 5 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1243
Abstract
A 66-year-old woman presented with persistent knee effusion three months after undergoing a cemented medial uni-compartmental knee replacement. She was afebrile and able to walk with a stick. Physical examination revealed moderate effusion. Radiographs showed posteriorly extruded cement, while computed tomography confirmed the [...] Read more.
A 66-year-old woman presented with persistent knee effusion three months after undergoing a cemented medial uni-compartmental knee replacement. She was afebrile and able to walk with a stick. Physical examination revealed moderate effusion. Radiographs showed posteriorly extruded cement, while computed tomography confirmed the absence of implant loosening but was unable to adequately visualize the adjacent soft tissues due to metallic artifacts. Ultrasound identified posterior cement extrusion beyond the femoral component, causing a delamination tear of the posterior capsule and indentation on the medial gastrocnemius. Knee arthrocentesis yielded 60 mL of blood-stained fluid with unremarkable analysis, and the patient reported improvement following the procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first report to highlight the unique role of ultrasound in detailing the anatomy of extruded cement and its impact on adjacent soft tissues following knee replacement. We demonstrate the critical structures that should be evaluated and how ultrasound aids in managing this postoperative complication. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 286 KiB  
Review
Are Current Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Fit for Purpose to Evaluate Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty?
by John M. Bayram, Nicholas D. Clement, Andrew J. Hall, Phil Walmsley and Jon V. Clarke
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010203 - 2 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1354
Abstract
The optimal procedure for isolated end-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains uncertain, with debate persisting between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate current outcome measures in knee arthroplasty (KA) and [...] Read more.
The optimal procedure for isolated end-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains uncertain, with debate persisting between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate current outcome measures in knee arthroplasty (KA) and explore how evolving patient populations and technological advancements may necessitate the use of different patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for evaluating UKA. While UKA offers potential advantages over TKA in early pain relief and functional outcomes, most randomised control trials using traditional PROMs have failed to show definitive superiority. The recent introduction of robotic assistance may have further enhanced the benefits of UKA. However, it remains uncertain whether the advantages outweigh the higher revision rates associated with UKA. Although traditional PROMs, such as the Oxford Knee Score or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, were designed for the KA population of 30 years ago, they continue to be employed today. The current KA population, particularly those undergoing UKA, are typically younger, physically fitter, and have higher functional demands than those for whom traditional PROMs were originally designed. As a result, these PROMs are now limited by ceiling effects. High-performance PROMs, such as the Forgotten Joint Score-12 or the metabolic equivalent of task score, have recently been utilised for high-demand patients and do not have postoperative ceiling effects. Return to work and sport are also important outcomes that are often overlooked for younger, high-demand patients. Future studies should aim to define the differences between UKA and TKA populations, identify patient factors that predict UKA success, and validate high-performance PROMs for UKA. This will provide deeper insights into the functional benefits of UKA and TKA, enabling patients and surgeons to make more informed decisions regarding implant selection. Full article
19 pages, 4072 KiB  
Systematic Review
Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Better FJS-12 Score and Lower Mid-Term Complication Rates Compared to Conventional Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by George M. Avram, Horia Tomescu, Cicio Dennis, Vlad Rusu, Natalie Mengis, Elias Ammann, Giacomo Pacchiarotti, Michael T. Hirschmann, Vlad Predescu and Octav Russu
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(12), 1137; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14121137 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1284
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty (rUKA) is gradually gaining more popularity than its conventional counterpart (cUKA). Current studies are highly heterogenic in terms of methodology and the reported results; therefore, establishing the optimal recommendation for patients becomes less straightforward. For this reason, this [...] Read more.
Background: Robotic-assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty (rUKA) is gradually gaining more popularity than its conventional counterpart (cUKA). Current studies are highly heterogenic in terms of methodology and the reported results; therefore, establishing the optimal recommendation for patients becomes less straightforward. For this reason, this meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date evidence-based analysis on current evidence regarding clinical outcomes and complication rates following rUKA and cUKA. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched, PubMed via MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The relevant inclusion criteria were as follows: comparative clinical studies in which medial rUKA was compared to medial cUKA (prospective or retrospective designs), (2) human studies, (3) meta-analyses for cross-referencing, and (4) English language. The relevant extracted data were patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion, and complications. A random-effects meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted. The results include mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous and binary variables, respectively. Results: rUKA showed a higher overall FJS-12 score compared to cUKA, with MD = 6.02 (95%CI: −0.07 to 12.1), p = 0.05. At 6 months postoperatively, the MD increased to 10.31 (95%CI: 5.14 to 15.49), p < 0.01. At a minimum 36-month follow-up, cUKA had a higher all-cause revision rate, with OR = 3.31 (95%CI: 1.25 to 8.8), p = 0.02, and at a minimum 60-month follow-up, a higher aseptic loosening rate, with OR = 3.86 (95%CI: 1.51 to 9.91), p < 0.01, compared to rUKA. Conclusions: rUKA provides better FJS-12 results compared to cUKA, as well as lower all-cause revision and aseptic loosening rates at 36- and 60-month follow-up, respectively. However, long-term follow-up is still pending. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2030 KiB  
Article
Does the Type of Knee Arthroplasty Affect the Patient’s Postural Stability?
by Tomasz Sorysz, Aleksandra Adamik and Katarzyna Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1582; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101582 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1107
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess postural stability in patients after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Materials and Methods: The study included 40 women who had undergone knee arthroplasties—20 women who had undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess postural stability in patients after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. Materials and Methods: The study included 40 women who had undergone knee arthroplasties—20 women who had undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (mean age 63.47 ± 2.17) and 20 women who had undergone unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) (mean age 64.65 ± 1.93). The comparison group consisted of 20 healthy women aged 60–69 years (mean age 64.45 ± 3.12). The average time from surgery to stabilometry was 14.4 months. Each patient underwent stabilography using a single-plate stabilography platform, which included both Romberg’s test and a dynamic test. Additionally, the WOMAC scale was administered, where patients assessed their condition both before surgery and at the present time. Results: The averaged Romberg’s test results show a slight displacement in the center of mass (COM) toward the forefoot and towards the right limb in both the TKA and UKA groups. The WOMAC scale results showed significant improvement and satisfactory functional outcomes in both groups. Conclusions: The study indicated that one year after surgery, patients in both groups required a larger base of support to maintain postural control. However, the results for the UKA group were more similar to those of healthy individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 298 KiB  
Article
All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers Excellent Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study
by Tommaso Bonanzinga, Federico Maria Adravanti, Umberto Vitale, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Francesco Iacono and Maurilio Marcacci
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1451; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091451 - 4 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1404
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The ten-year survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is up to 96%, varying from implants and hospitals; however, most of registry studies do not distinguish between metal-back (MB) tibial implants and all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants. The aim of the [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The ten-year survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is up to 96%, varying from implants and hospitals; however, most of registry studies do not distinguish between metal-back (MB) tibial implants and all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants. The aim of the present retrospective clinical study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and survivorship of medial and lateral UKA with a newly designed all-polyethylene tibial plateau at short-term follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent medial or lateral UKA with AP tibial plateau was conducted, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Primary outcomes were clinical score (VAS, OKS, and KOOS) variations from baseline up to the latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes were Likert scale variations from baseline to the follow-up, evaluation of the influence of demographic factors (age and BMI) at the time of surgery on the clinical outcomes, and evaluation of revision rate up to the last follow-up. Results: The final study population included 99 knees. The mean VAS score for the medial group significantly decreased from 7.61 ± 1.65 (pre-intervention) to 2.74 ± 2.26 (post-intervention). Similar improvements were registered for the OKS as well, for both the medial group (from 22.5 ± 12.6 to 36.6 ± 10.6, with a delta of 14.11 (10.05 to 18.17)) and the lateral group (from 22.6 ± 12.6 to 36.9 ± 11.8, with a delta of 14.24 (8.65 to 19.83)). Moreover, all the KOOS subscales reported an amelioration, both in medial UKA and lateral UKA. Furthermore, a logistic regression of delta VAS was performed in relation to the other clinical questionnaires and the demographic factors. For both medial and lateral UKAs, no statistically significant correlation was found between the VAS scale regression and the demographic factors. The survival rate free from any revision of the cohort at the latest follow-up was 96.32%. Conclusions: All-polyethylene tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty demonstrates significant improvements in clinical scores and a low failure rate at short-term follow-up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancements in Total Knee Arthroplasty)
11 pages, 1221 KiB  
Article
Femoral Translation in Patients with Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis—A Cohort Study
by Mathis Wegner, Simon Kuwert, Stefan Kratzenstein, Maciej J. K. Simon and Babak Moradi
Biomechanics 2024, 4(3), 428-438; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics4030029 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1394
Abstract
The use of three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis to image femorotibial translation can aid in the diagnosis of pathology and provide additional insight into the severity of KOA (knee osteoarthritis). Femorotibial translation is of particular importance in patients undergoing UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), as [...] Read more.
The use of three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis to image femorotibial translation can aid in the diagnosis of pathology and provide additional insight into the severity of KOA (knee osteoarthritis). Femorotibial translation is of particular importance in patients undergoing UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), as the absence or elongation of ligamentous structures results in changes in the kinematic alignment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the parameters of femorotibial translation in patients with MOA (medial unicompartmental OA). An artificial model was employed to develop a method for calculating femorotibial translation in vitro. In a prospective cohort study, gait data using three-dimensional gait analysis were collected from 11 patients (68.73 ± 9.22 years) with severe OA scheduled for UKA and 29 unmatched healthy participants (22.07 ± 2.23 years). The discrete variables characterising femorotibial translation were compared for statistical significance (p < 0.05) using the Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test. The results of the study validated an artificial model to mimic femorotibial translation. The comparison of patients scheduled for UKA and a healthy unmatched control group showed no statistically significant differences concerning femorotibial translation in all three planes (p > 0.05). However, the PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures), spatiotemporal, and kinematic parameters showed statistically significant differences between the groups (p < 0.001). The data presented here demonstrate typical changes in PROMs as well as spatiotemporal and kinematic outcomes for MOA as seen in knee OA. The results of the clinical gait analyses demonstrate individualised femorotibial translation. The extent of individual femorotibial translation may prove to be an important parameter for altered joint kinematics in patients with MOA, especially prior to UKA implantation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Injury Biomechanics and Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 721 KiB  
Article
Comparing Complication Rates, Costs, and Length of Stay between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Insights from a Big Data Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample Dataset
by David Maman, Assil Mahamid, Yaniv Yonai and Yaron Berkovich
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3888; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133888 - 2 Jul 2024
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2208
Abstract
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly used for knee osteoarthritis due to faster recovery, better range of motion, and lower costs compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While TKA may offer longer-lasting results with lower revision rates, this study compares the relative [...] Read more.
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is increasingly used for knee osteoarthritis due to faster recovery, better range of motion, and lower costs compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While TKA may offer longer-lasting results with lower revision rates, this study compares the relative benefits and limitations of UKA and TKA using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Methods: This retrospective analysis examined outcomes of elective UKA and TKA procedures from 2016 to 2019, identifying 2,606,925 patients via ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching based on demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidities resulted in a balanced cohort of 136,890 patients. The present study compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, postoperative complications, and hospitalization costs. Results: The results showed that UKA procedures increased significantly over the study period. Patients undergoing UKA were generally younger with fewer comorbidities. After matching, both groups had low in-hospital mortality (0.015%). UKA patients had shorter hospital stays (1.53 vs. 2.47 days) and lower costs (USD 55,976 vs. USD 61,513) compared to TKA patients. UKA patients had slightly higher rates of intraoperative fracture and pulmonary edema, while TKA patients had higher risks of blood transfusion, anemia, coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. Conclusions: UKA appears to be a less-invasive, cost-effective option for younger patients with localized knee osteoarthritis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2278 KiB  
Review
Management of Medial Femorotibial Knee Osteoarthritis in Conjunction with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: Technical Note and Literature Review
by Claudio Legnani, Alberto Ventura, Laura Mangiavini, Nicola Maffulli and Giuseppe M. Peretti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3143; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113143 - 27 May 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1751
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the management of medial femorotibial knee osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Traditional treatment modalities included conservative therapy, high tibial osteotomy with or without ACL reconstruction, and total knee replacement. [...] Read more.
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the management of medial femorotibial knee osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Traditional treatment modalities included conservative therapy, high tibial osteotomy with or without ACL reconstruction, and total knee replacement. Since younger patients with higher physical demands are more likely to suffer from this pathological condition, reduced invasiveness, faster recovery time, and improved knee kinematics are preferred to allow for satisfying clinical and functional outcomes. Thus, a new surgical strategy combining medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and ACL reconstruction has been proposed to allow bone stock preservation, to reduce surgical morbidity and recovery time, and ultimately to improve joint kinematics and clinical outcomes. Based on the data present in the literature, in the setting of unicompartmental OA in association with ACL deficiency, UKR combined with ACL reconstruction provided encouraging early results. Studies evaluating the outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction and UKR demonstrate promising results in select patient populations. Improved knee stability, pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction improved after surgery. Moreover, the combined approach offered advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, faster rehabilitation, and preservation of native knee anatomy compared with traditional treatment strategies. However, still, high-level studies on this topic are lacking; therefore, more comparative studies reporting long-term outcomes are needed to support the potential of this combined procedure to become mainstream. In this paper, we discuss the relevant features and rationale behind the indications and technique of this combined surgical procedure, to help surgeons choose the correct therapeutic approach for a patient with concomitant medial OA and ACL insufficiency. Continued advancements in surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and rehabilitation strategies will further enhance the success of this combined approach, offering hope to individuals with concomitant ACL injuries and unicompartmental knee OA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 605 KiB  
Article
How Useful Is Preoperative Aspiration before Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Prostheses Because of Osteoarthritis in the Other Compartments?
by Benedikt Paul Blersch, Florian Hubert Sax and Bernd Fink
Antibiotics 2024, 13(4), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13040361 - 15 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1369
Abstract
Aim: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) can lead to secondary osteoarthritis of the other compartments. The objective of this study was to identify the frequency of PJIs in cases of UKA with progressed secondary osteoarthritis and the result of [...] Read more.
Aim: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) can lead to secondary osteoarthritis of the other compartments. The objective of this study was to identify the frequency of PJIs in cases of UKA with progressed secondary osteoarthritis and the result of septic one-stage revision in these cases to verify the value of preoperative aspiration in cases of secondary osteoarthritis of UKA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with a unicompartmental arthroplasty who underwent revision surgery to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 2013 and March 2021 because of subsequent osteoarthritis. Preoperative aspiration and sample collection during the revision surgery were employed to identify potential periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The post-revision period was monitored for septic complications over an average duration of 55.7 ± 25.2 months (24–113). Results: PJIs were identified in 5.2% of cases through preoperative aspiration. In all instances of PJIs, a one-stage septic revision was performed, and notably, none of these cases experienced septic complications during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Preoperative aspiration is essential in order to exclude the presence of a PJI before performing revision surgery of UKA due to secondary osteoarthritis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention and Antibiotic Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 708 KiB  
Article
A Cross-Sectional Study of Factors Predicting the Duration of the Efficacy of Viscosupplementation in Knee Osteoarthritis
by Charles Rapp, Feriel Boudif, Charlotte Bourgoin, Anne Lohse and Thierry Conrozier
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1949; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071949 - 27 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1639
Abstract
Background: An advanced radiological stage and obesity are predictive of poorer and shorter responses to viscosupplementation in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Very little is known regarding the impact of other factors such as sport practice, comorbidities, or anatomical features of OA. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: An advanced radiological stage and obesity are predictive of poorer and shorter responses to viscosupplementation in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Very little is known regarding the impact of other factors such as sport practice, comorbidities, or anatomical features of OA. Methods: This study aimed to investigate patients’ and OA characteristics associated with the duration of the effectiveness (DE) of viscosupplementation in patients with knee OA. It was a cross-sectional, single-centre clinical trial in patients with knee OA treated with intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injection(s) within the previous 3 years. The investigators collected data regarding demographic and radiographic features (Kellgren–Lawrence grade and involved knee compartments), dosing regimen (single or repeat injections), the presence and volume of joint effusion, previous or concomitant IA corticosteroid injection, the number of previous viscosupplementations, and comorbidities. Patients completed a questionnaire including the self-assessment of DE (the number of weeks during which viscosupplementation was effective on symptoms), the activity level (sedentary, active, or athletic), and the level of sport activity (light, moderate, or intensive). Predictors of the DE were studied in bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results: In total, 105 patients (149 knees) were analysed (62% women, mean age 66.1 ± 13.2 years, mean BMI 27.5 ± 7.5 kg/m2). The mean DE was 48.2 ± 24.8 weeks. In bivariate analysis, the predictors of a shorter DE were BMI > 27.5 kg/m2, more than three previous viscosupplementations, Kellgren–Lawrence grade 4, sedentary patients, and multicompartmental involvement. In the multivariate analysis, four independent factors remained associated with a shorter DE: BMI > 27.5 kg/m2, multicompartmental knee involvement, number of viscosupplementations >3, and sedentary lifestyle. A statistically significant association between a longer DE and arterial hypertension was found, suggesting a beneficial effect of certain antihypertensive medications. Conclusions: This study confirms that being overweight significantly reduces the duration of the effectiveness of viscosupplementation. It also shows that viscosupplementation is more lastingly effective in unicompartmental OA and among active or athletic patients. The duration of effectiveness decreases when the treatment is repeated more than three times. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop