Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = two-stage dynamic SBM DEA

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
36 pages, 7377 KB  
Article
Ecological Comprehensive Efficiency and Driving Mechanisms of China’s Water–Energy–Food System and Climate Change System Based on the Carbon Nexus: Insights from the Integration of Network DEA and the Geographic Detector
by Fang-Rong Ren, Fang-Yi Sun, Xiao-Yan Liu and Hui-Lin Liu
Land 2025, 14(10), 2042; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14102042 - 13 Oct 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1041
Abstract
As a major energy producer and consumer, China has witnessed rapid growth in carbon emissions, which are closely linked to changes in regional climate and the environment. Water, energy, and food (W-E-F) are the three most critical components of human production and daily [...] Read more.
As a major energy producer and consumer, China has witnessed rapid growth in carbon emissions, which are closely linked to changes in regional climate and the environment. Water, energy, and food (W-E-F) are the three most critical components of human production and daily life, and achieving the coordinated development of these three resources and connecting them with climate change through the carbon emissions generated during their utilization processes has become a key issue for realizing regional ecological sustainable development. This study constructs a dynamic two-stage network slack-based measure-data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model, which integrates the water–energy–food (W-E-F) system with the climate change process to evaluate China’s comprehensive ecological efficiency from 2011 to 2022, and adopts the Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition, kernel density estimation, hierarchical clustering, and geographical detector model to analyze provincial panel data, thereby assessing efficiency patterns, regional differences, and driving mechanisms. The novelty and contributions of this study can be summarized in three aspects. First, it establishes a unified framework that incorporates the W-E-F nexus and climate change into a dynamic network SBM-DEA model, enabling a more systematic assessment of ecological efficiency. Second, it uncovers that interregional overlap effects and policy-driven factors are the dominant sources of spatial and temporal disparities in ecological efficiency. Third, it further quantifies the interactive effects among key driving factors using Geodetector, thus offering practical insights for regional coordination and policy design. The results show that China’s national ecological efficiency is at a medium level. Southern China has consistently maintained a leading position, while provinces in northwest and southwest China have remained relatively backward; the efficiency of the water–energy–food integration stage is relatively high, whereas the efficiency of the climate change stage is medium and exhibits significant temporal fluctuations. Interregional differences are the main source of efficiency gaps; ecological quality, environmental protection efforts, and population size are identified as the primary driving factors, and their interaction effects have intensified spatial heterogeneity. In addition, sub-indicator analysis reveals that the efficiency related to total wastewater, air pollutant emissions, and agricultural pollution shows good synergy, while the efficiency associated with sudden environmental change events is highly volatile and has weak correlations with other undesirable outputs. These findings deepen the understanding of the water–energy–food-climate system and provide policy implications for strengthening ecological governance and regional coordination. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1240 KB  
Article
Influences of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in China
by Wanfang Shen, Jianing Shi, Qinggang Meng, Xiaolan Chen, Yufei Liu, Ken Cheng and Wenbin Liu
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4717; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084717 - 14 Apr 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4208
Abstract
The Paris Agreement marks global response to climate change after 2020 and China has proposed the dual carbon goals, carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, in response. This paper analyses the contribution to dual carbon goals by analyzing the impact of environmental regulations (ERs) [...] Read more.
The Paris Agreement marks global response to climate change after 2020 and China has proposed the dual carbon goals, carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, in response. This paper analyses the contribution to dual carbon goals by analyzing the impact of environmental regulations (ERs) on green technology innovation (GTI) in China. First, considering variances in energy consumption structure across provinces and industries, industrial CO2 emission is calculated and set as an undesirable output of industrial GTI. Then, industrial green technology innovation efficiencies (GTIE) of 29 provinces in China between 2005–2017 are calculated using a non-oriented two-stage network SBM-DEA model assuming variable returns to scale. Last, dynamic evolution and regional differences of industrial GTIE during green technology R&D, green technology commercialization, and overall GTI stages are respectively observed, and the influences from different types of ERs, command-based (CER), market-based (MER), and voluntary (VER), on industrial GTIE are analyzed. We identify China is overall experiencing relatively low but gradually increasing industrial GTIE and Industrial GTIE present gradient changes across provinces with increasingly prominent regional difference. It is found that influences of types of ERs on industrial GTIE present dynamic effect, threshold effect, lag effect and regional differences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2265 KB  
Article
The Impacts of Water Pollution Emissions on Public Health in 30 Provinces of China
by Zhen Shi, Shijiong Qin, Chenjun Zhang, Yung-ho Chiu and Lina Zhang
Healthcare 2020, 8(2), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020119 - 30 Apr 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6134
Abstract
China’s economy in recent decades has developed at a very rapid speed, as evidenced by its GDP jumping to second place in the world. Although utilization of domestic water resources has helped spur economic development, sewage discharge as an undesirable output has unfortunately [...] Read more.
China’s economy in recent decades has developed at a very rapid speed, as evidenced by its GDP jumping to second place in the world. Although utilization of domestic water resources has helped spur economic development, sewage discharge as an undesirable output has unfortunately caused many negative effects on human health, causing concern from all walks of life. Therefore, governments in China at all levels are committed to urban sewage treatment policies in order to reduce the negative impact of water pollution on society. While most existing studies have targeted the macro-level modes of economic development and environmental pollution, their selection of research objects is too narrow by failing to adequately consider China's water pollution and the consequential national health crisis. This study takes cities in 30 provinces of China as the research objects and applies various influencing factors of urban wastewater treatment and health (as two stages) to the modified two-stage dynamic Slacks-Based Measures (SBM) Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. The results reveal that the overall efficiency of each province is increasing and that the efficiency of the wastewater treatment stage is greater, thus contributing to overall efficiency. Conversely, the health stage’s efficiency is far lower than the wastewater treatment stage’s efficiency, which has a notably adverse effect on overall efficiency. In addition, most input-output variables need much improvement. Based on the findings herein, we offer specific suggestions to each province for improving sewage treatment capacity, the level of medical care, and the quality of national health. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop