Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = transanal irrigation (TAI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 1445 KB  
Review
Usefulness of Transanal Irrigation and Colon Hydrotherapy in the Treatment of Chronic Constipation and Beyond: A Review with New Perspectives for Bio-Integrated Medicine
by Raffaele Borghini, Francesco Borghini, Alessia Spagnuolo, Agnese Borghini and Giovanni Borghini
Gastrointest. Disord. 2026, 8(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord8010006 - 12 Jan 2026
Abstract
Transanal Irrigation (TAI) and Colon Hydrotherapy (CHT) represent emerging therapeutic options that may complement first-line interventions or serve as rescue treatments for chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Their clinical utility depends on patient characteristics, specific therapeutic goals, device features, and probe type, as [...] Read more.
Transanal Irrigation (TAI) and Colon Hydrotherapy (CHT) represent emerging therapeutic options that may complement first-line interventions or serve as rescue treatments for chronic constipation and fecal incontinence. Their clinical utility depends on patient characteristics, specific therapeutic goals, device features, and probe type, as well as the procedural setting. This review presents the various pathophysiological contexts in which these techniques can be applied, analyzing their specific characteristics and potential pros and cons. Moreover, these interventions are also considered within a Psycho-Neuro-Endocrino-Immunological (PNEI) framework, given the potential influence of intestinal function and microbiota modulation on the bidirectional communication pathways linking the enteric nervous system, neuroendocrine regulation, immune activity, and global patient well-being. Since there is not yet enough scientific data on this topic, future research should prioritize randomized controlled trials comparing these techniques with other standard treatments (e.g., laxatives or dietary fiber) in defined patient populations. Longitudinal studies will also be essential to clarify long-term safety, potential effects on microbiota, and both risks and benefits. Standardization of technical procedures also remains a critical need, especially regarding professional competencies, operating parameters (e.g., instilled volumes and pressure ranges), and reproducible protocols. Moreover, future investigations should incorporate objective outcome measures, as colonic transit time, stool form and frequency, indices of inflammation or intestinal wall integrity, and changes to microbiome composition. In conclusion, TAI and CHT have the potential to serve as important interventions for the treatment and prevention of chronic constipation and intestinal dysbiosis, as well as their broader systemic correlates, in the setting of bio-integrated medicine. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 517 KB  
Systematic Review
Transanal Irrigation in Patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal-Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Oncological and Non-Oncological Disease: A Systematic Review
by Andrea Morini, Massimiliano Fabozzi, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Andrea Palicelli, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Candida Bonelli and Maurizio Zizzo
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2024, 13(4), 409-425; https://doi.org/10.3390/std13040033 - 22 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2693
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Transanal irrigation (TAI) has been recognized as a safe and effective treatment for neurological bowel dysfunction, chronic constipation or fecal incontinence and has also been proposed for patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aim of the present systematic review was [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Transanal irrigation (TAI) has been recognized as a safe and effective treatment for neurological bowel dysfunction, chronic constipation or fecal incontinence and has also been proposed for patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of TAI in patients with significant LARS symptoms. Methods: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and guidelines in addition to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023436839). The risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. The main outcome was improvement in low anterior resection syndrome after TAI assessed by change in LARS score. Results: After an initial screening of 3703 studies, 9 were included and underwent qualitative synthesis (among them, 3 were randomized clinical trials). All studies recorded an improvement in LARS score following TAI procedure and almost all studies showed an improvement in other bowel function outcomes (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC BFI, ), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), visual analog scale (VAS), Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFFIS), fecal incontinence score (FI score), Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) score) and quality of life (QoL) scores. The discontinuation rate ranged from 0% to 41%. The rate of adverse events was high (from 0 to 93%); moreover, no uniformity was found in the various protocols used among the different studies. Conclusions: The results of this review show that TAI is effective in the treatment of LARS, improving the LARS score, the other bowel function outcomes and the QoL scores. The absence of a treatment protocol validated by the scientific community is reflected in the high disparity in terms of adverse events and discontinuation of therapy, in addition to representing an intrinsic limitation to the study itself. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1622 KB  
Review
The Functional Implications of Transanal Irrigation: Insights from Pathophysiology and Clinical Studies of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction
by Gianna Rodriguez, Steven Kirshblum, Mai Thao, Mackenzie McArthur and Michael Camilleri
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061527 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 8050
Abstract
Defecation function is negatively impacted in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), who require effective bowel care for stool evacuation. NBD comprises fecal incontinence and/or constipation, which can reduce the quality of life and dignity. Transanal irrigation (TAI) is recommended by several clinical [...] Read more.
Defecation function is negatively impacted in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), who require effective bowel care for stool evacuation. NBD comprises fecal incontinence and/or constipation, which can reduce the quality of life and dignity. Transanal irrigation (TAI) is recommended by several clinical guidelines as the second-line treatment after conservative treatment and before surgical options are considered. As the only class in the second-line treatment with an established safety and efficacy profile, the mechanism of action of TAI has not fully been elucidated when administered through a rectal catheter with a balloon. This review examines the current understanding regarding the mechanism of action of TAI, with a focus on the pathophysiology of neurogenic bowel and irregular defecation. By understanding the functional implications of TAI, clinicians may be better able to integrate this modality into bowel care programs, especially for patients with NBD who have significant constipation due to delayed colonic motility and impaired stool emptying with loss of voluntary control of defecation, and those who are unresponsive to conservative treatment, including enemas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 546 KB  
Review
Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Following Resection for Rectal Cancer
by Harald Rosen, Christian G. Sebesta and Christian Sebesta
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030778 - 27 Jan 2023
Cited by 42 | Viewed by 8606
Abstract
Introduction: A total of 60–80% of patients undergoing rectal resection (mostly as a treatment for rectal cancer) suffer from a variety of partly severe functional problems despite preservation of the anal sphincter. These patients are summarized under the term low anterior resection syndrome [...] Read more.
Introduction: A total of 60–80% of patients undergoing rectal resection (mostly as a treatment for rectal cancer) suffer from a variety of partly severe functional problems despite preservation of the anal sphincter. These patients are summarized under the term low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Preoperative radiotherapy, vascular dissection and surgical excision of the low rectum and mesorectum lead, alone or all together, to a significant impairment of colonic and (neo-) rectal motility. This results in a variety of symptoms (multiple defecation episodes, recurrent episodes of urge, clustering, incontinence, etc.) which are associated with severe impairment of quality of life (QOL). Methods: This narrative review summarizes the present state of knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of LARS as well as the evidence for the available treatment options to control the symptoms resulting from this condition. Results: A review of the literature (Medline, Pubmed) reveals a variety of treatment options available to control symptoms of LARS. Medical therapy, with or without dietary modification, shows only a modest effect. Pelvic floor rehabilitation consisting of muscle exercise techniques as well as biofeedback training has been associated with improvement in LARS scores and incontinence, albeit with limited scientific evidence. Transanal irrigation (TAI) has gained interest as a treatment modality for patients with LARS due to an increasing number of promising data from recently published studies. Despite this promising observation, open questions about still-unclear issues of TAI remain under debate. Neuromodulation has been applied in LARS only in a few studies with small numbers of patients and partly conflicting results. Conclusion: LARS is a frequent problem after sphincter-preserving rectal surgery and leads to a marked impairment of QOL. Due to the large number of patients suffering from this condition, mandatory identification, as well as treatment of affected patients, must be considered during surgical as well as oncological follow-up. The use of a standardized treatment algorithm will lead to sufficient control of symptoms and a high probability of a marked improvement in QOL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3687 KB  
Article
Advanced Management Protocol of Transanal Irrigation in Order to Improve the Outcome of Pediatric Patients with Fecal Incontinence
by Anna Maria Caruso, Mario Pietro Marcello Milazzo, Denisia Bommarito, Vincenza Girgenti, Glenda Amato, Giuseppe Paviglianiti, Alessandra Casuccio, Pieralba Catalano, Marcello Cimador and Maria Rita Di Pace
Children 2021, 8(12), 1174; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121174 - 11 Dec 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3339
Abstract
Background: Transanal irrigation (TAI) is employed for children with fecal incontinence, but it can present several problems which require a study of their outcomes among different pathologies and without a tailored work up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness [...] Read more.
Background: Transanal irrigation (TAI) is employed for children with fecal incontinence, but it can present several problems which require a study of their outcomes among different pathologies and without a tailored work up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced protocol in order to tailor TAI, prevent complications, and evaluate outcomes. Methods: We included 70 patients (14 anorectal malformation, 12 Hirschsprung’s disease, 24 neurological impairment, 20 functional incontinence) submitted to a comprehensive protocol with Peristeen®: fecal score, volumetric enema, rectal ultrasound, anorectal 3D manometry, and diary for testing and parameter adjustment. Results: Among the patients, 62.9% needed adaptations to the parameters, mainly volume of irrigated water and number of puffs of balloon. These adaptations were positively correlated with pre-treatment manometric and enema data. In each group, the improvement of score was statistically significant in all cases (p 0.000); the main factor influencing the efficacy was the rate of sphincter anomalies. The ARM group had slower improvement than other groups, whereas functional patients had the best response. Conclusions: Our results showed that TAI should not be standardized for all patients, because each one has different peculiarities; evaluation of patients before TAI with rectal ultrasound, enema, and manometry allowed us to tailor the treatment, highlighting different outcomes among various pathologies, thus improving the efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 619 KB  
Review
Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Children and Adolescents
by Giovanni Mosiello, Shaista Safder, David Marshall, Udo Rolle and Marc A. Benninga
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(8), 1669; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081669 - 13 Apr 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 10688
Abstract
Neurogenic/neuropathic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common in children who are affected by congenital and acquired neurological disease, and negatively impacts quality of life. In the past, NBD received less attention than neurogenic bladder, generally being considered only in spina bifida (the most common [...] Read more.
Neurogenic/neuropathic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common in children who are affected by congenital and acquired neurological disease, and negatively impacts quality of life. In the past, NBD received less attention than neurogenic bladder, generally being considered only in spina bifida (the most common cause of pediatric NBD). Many methods of conservative and medical management of NBD are reported, including relatively recently Transanal Irrigation (TAI). Based on the literature and personal experience, an expert group (pediatric urologists/surgeons/gastroenterologists with specific experience in NBD) focused on NBD in children and adolescents. A statement document was created using a modified Delphi method. The range of causes of pediatric NBD are discussed in this paper. The various therapeutic approaches are presented to improve clinical management. The population of children and adolescents with NBD is increasing, due both to the higher survival rate and better diagnosis. While NBD is relatively predictable in producing either constipation or fecal incontinence, or both, its various effects on each patient will depend on a wide range of underlying causes and accompanying comorbidities. For this reason, management of NBD should be tailored individually with a combined multidisciplinary therapy appropriate for the status of the affected child and caregivers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1288 KB  
Review
Transanal Irrigation for Neurogenic Bowel Disease, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, Faecal Incontinence and Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review
by Mira Mekhael, Helle Ø Kristensen, Helene Mathilde Larsen, Therese Juul, Anton Emmanuel, Klaus Krogh and Peter Christensen
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040753 - 13 Feb 2021
Cited by 60 | Viewed by 7552
Abstract
Transanal irrigation (TAI) has received increasing attention as a treatment option in patients with bowel dysfunction. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and evaluates the effect of TAI in neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), faecal [...] Read more.
Transanal irrigation (TAI) has received increasing attention as a treatment option in patients with bowel dysfunction. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and evaluates the effect of TAI in neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), faecal incontinence (FI) and chronic constipation (CC). The primary outcome was the effect of TAI on bowel function. Secondary outcomes included details on TAI, quality of life (QoL), the discontinuation rate, adverse events, predictive factors for a successful outcome, and health economics. A systematic search for articles reporting original data on the effect of TAI on bowel function was performed, and 27 eligible studies including 1435 individuals were included. Three randomised controlled trials, one non-randomised trial, and 23 observational studies were included; 70% of the studies were assessed to be of excellent or good methodological quality. Results showed an improvement in bowel function among patients with NBD, LARS, FI, and CC with some studies showing improvement in QoL. However, discontinuation rates were high. Side effects were common, but equally prevalent among comparative treatments. No consistent predictive factors for a successful outcome were identified. Results from this review show that TAI improves bowel function and potentially QoL; however, evidence remains limited. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1259 KB  
Article
Effects of Transanal Irrigation on Gut Microbiota in Pediatric Patients with Spina Bifida
by Akira Furuta, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Ryosuke Takahashi, Birte Petersen Jakobsen, Takahiro Kimura, Shin Egawa and Naoki Yoshimura
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020224 - 10 Jan 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4190
Abstract
Recent studies using 16S rRNA-based microbiota profiling have demonstrated dysbiosis of gut microbiota in constipated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in gut microbiota after transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with spina bifida (SB). A questionnaire on neurogenic [...] Read more.
Recent studies using 16S rRNA-based microbiota profiling have demonstrated dysbiosis of gut microbiota in constipated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in gut microbiota after transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with spina bifida (SB). A questionnaire on neurogenic bowel disfunction (NBD), Bristol scale, and gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing were completed in 16 SB patients and 10 healthy controls aged 6–17 years. Then, 11 of 16 SB patients with moderate to severe NBD scores received TAI for 3 months. Changes in urine cultures were also examined before and after the TAI treatments. In addition, correlation of gut microbiota and Bristol scale was analyzed. Significantly decreased abundance in Faecalibacterium, Blautia and Roseburia, and significantly increased abundance in Bacteroides and Roseburia were observed in the SB patients compared with controls and after TAI, respectively. The abundance of Roseburia was significantly correlated positively with Bristol scale. Urinary tract infection tended to decrease from 82% to 55% after TAI (p = 0.082) despite persistent fecal incontinence. Butyrate-producing bacteria such as Roseburia play a regulatory role in the intestinal motility and host immune system, suggesting the effects of TAI on gut microbiota. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop