Search Results (72)

Background/Objectives: In the context of diabetes, a multifactorial metabolic disorder with significant clinical implications, the present study investigates the hypoglycemic effects of a synthetic sulfonamide (S) administered individually and in combination with Salvia officinalis extract, compared to metformin as a standard therapeutic agent. Methods: An in vivo model of experimentally induced diabetes using alloxan was applied to Wistar female rats, divided into six experimental groups, including a healthy control group and a diabetes-induced, untreated group. Plasma concentrations of metformin and sulfonamide were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. The plasma steady-state concentrations of the pharmaceutical agents and their correlation with hypoglycemic effect were evaluated. Results: The combination of the synthetic sulfonamide (S) with Salvia officinalis extract resulted in the greatest reduction in blood glucose level (average value of 50.2%) compared to S (40.6%) or metformin (36.4%). All treatments demonstrated statistically significant differences in blood glucose levels compared to the diabetes-induced untreated group (p < 0.05). Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a larger volume of distribution for the synthetic sulfonamide S (23.92 ± 8.40 L) compared to metformin (16.07 ± 5.60 L), consistent with its physicochemical properties. No significant correlation was found between plasma drug levels and glycemic response (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings support the potential of combining standard therapeutic agents with natural alternatives such as Salvia officinalis to achieve improved glycemic control through complementary mechanisms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study to evaluate the combined effects of a sulfonylurea-type compound and Salvia officinalis extract in a diabetic animal model. Full article

Aim: Myricetin, a natural bioflavonoid, is reported as an anti-diabetic agent since it possesses the ability to inhibit α-glucosidase activity, stimulate insulin action and secretion, manage ROS, and prevent diabetes complications. Myricetin was identified as a new insulin secretagogue that enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and seems like a better antidiabetic drug candidate. Here, we explored the insulinotropic mechanism(s) of myricetin in vitro in mice islets and in silico. Methods: Size-matched pancreatic islets were divided into groups and incubated in the presence or absence of myricetin and agonists/antagonists of major insulin signaling pathways. The secreted insulin was measured by ELISA. Molecular docking studies were performed with the key player of insulin secretory pathways. Results: Myricetin dose-dependently enhanced insulin secretion in isolated mice islets, and its insulinotropic effect was exerted at high glucose concentrations distinctly different from glibenclamide. Myricetin-induced insulin secretion was significantly inhibited using the diazoxide. Furthermore, myricetin amplified glucose-induced insulin secretion in depolarized and glibenclamide-treated islets. Myricetin showed an additive effect with forskolin- and IBMX-induced insulin secretion. Interestingly, H89, a PKA inhibitor, and MAY0132, an Epac-2 inhibitor, significantly inhibited myricetin-induced insulin secretion. The in silico molecular docking studies further validated these in vitro findings in isolated pancreatic islets. Conclusions: Myricetin, a potential natural insulin secretagogue, amplifies glucose-induced insulin secretion via the cAMP-PKA-Epac-2 signaling pathway. Full article

Background: Oral semaglutide, a GLP1-receptor agonist (GLP1-RA), shows promise in efficacy and compliance, especially amid the global shortage of injectable GLP-1 RAs. Its short-term effectiveness remains unexplored. Objective: This real-world observational study assessed the short-term effectiveness of oral semaglutide after three months of therapy. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes from four Italian diabetes centers, who received an initial prescription of oral semaglutide, were reassessed after three months. Primary outcomes included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight reduction; secondary outcomes involved changes in lipid parameters and cardiovascular risk. Results: Among 167 participants (mean age 66.5 years, mostly obese, baseline HbA1c 8.4% ± 1.5), 83.2% received a 7 mg dose. After three months, HbA1c significantly declined (8.4% to 7.1%, −1.3%, p < 0.001), alongside body mass index (BMI) (30.9 kg/m² to 29.6 kg/m², p < 0.0001). The target HbA1c ≤ 7% was achieved by 54.5%, and 34.7% reached ≤6.5%. Patients losing >5% of their initial weight (30.5%) saw the largest HbA1c drop (−1.9%). Those with newly diagnosed diabetes or a duration < 5 years showed superior responses (p = 0.001), while no significant differences were found based on the timing of drug administration. Oral semaglutide replaced or supplemented prior therapies, allowing discontinuation of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), sulfonylureas, glinides, and acarbose, and deprescription of thiazolidinediones. A significant reduction in cardiovascular risk was observed (p = 0.04), together with a significant reduction in lipid parameters. Conclusions: Oral semaglutide showed significant short-term efficacy, reducing HbA1c, body weight, and cardiovascular risk in three months, making it a valuable therapeutic option. Full article

Optimized glycemic management is crucial for controlling atherosclerosis and consequent cardiovascular morbidity in patients with diabetes. Due to the continuous glucose burden from glucose-containing peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, PD patients with diabetes experience difficulties in glucose level regulation with glucose hypervariability and worsening dyslipidemia. Even in non-diabetic PD patients, glucose-containing PD solutions aggravate insulin resistance and cause overweight. Additionally, glucose degradation products (GDP) from glucose-based PD solutions provoke oxidative stress and complex inflammatory processes, leading to chronic deleterious and fibrotic peritoneal membrane changes. In this narrative review, we searched the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar over the last three decades to summarize the most important facts relevant to the presented issues, aiming to inform both endocrinologists and nephrologists in providing the best currently available care for people with diabetes on PD. We not only focus on adequate tailoring of insulin therapy adapted at the time of PD exchange with hypertonic glucose solution., but also emphasize the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) that allows assessment of mean glucose values and time spent in normal, hypo, and hyperglycemia. However, the routine use of CGM in PD patients is limited due to high cost, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis is still recommended as a basic clinical tool for the assessment of glycemic control. Possible choices of antidiabetic drugs were considered given the narrowed choice due to contraindications for metformin and sulfonylurea. The other important therapeutic approach in PD patients with diabetes is using glucose-sparing PD regimens based on icodextrin and amino acid PD solutions with the addition of just one or two bags of low glucose concentration PD solution daily. This glucose-sparing approach not only reduces the glucose load and improves glycoregulation with correction of the lipid profile but also maintains the viability of the peritoneal membrane by reducing the harmful effects of GDPs. Full article

Background/Objectives: α-carbonic anhydrase (α-TcCA) has emerged as a promising drug target in T. cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease in the Americas. Sulfonamides, known inhibitors of CAs, bind to the zinc ion on the enzyme’s active site. This study proposes the repositioning of sulfonamide-based drugs to identify new trypanocidal agents. Method: Ligand-based virtual screening and molecular docking analysis were performed on FDA-approved drugs targeting α-TcCA. These compounds were evaluated in vitro and ex vivo against the A1 and NINOA strains, followed by enzymatic assays. Results: Four sulfonylureas were selected: glimepiride (Glim), acetohexamide (Ace), gliclazide (Glic), and tolbutamide (Tol). Ace and Tol had half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) values similar or better than reference drugs against the NINOA strain in the epimastigote and trypomastigote stages, while Glic and Glim had the highest activity against the A1 strain (epimastigotes and amastigotes). Notably, Ace had the highest trypanocidal activity against all stages in NINOA, with IC₅₀ values of 6.5, 46.5, and 46 μM for epimastigotes, trypomastigotes, and amastigotes, respectively. Additionally, Ace inhibited α-TcCA with K_I = 5.6 μM, suggesting that its trypanocidal effect is associated to the enzyme inhibition. Conclusions: This study supports the repositioning of FDA-approved sulfonamide-based hypoglycaemic agents as trypanocidal compounds. Future studies should focus on structural modifications to improve selectivity. Integrating docking, parasitological, and enzymatic data is crucial for optimizing drug candidates for Chagas disease. Full article

Diabetes-related cognitive impairment (DCI) is a severe complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with limited understanding of its molecular mechanisms hindering effective therapeutic development. This study identified SERPINA3 as a potential therapeutic target for DCI through integrated machine learning and molecular docking analyses. Transcriptomic data from cortical neuronal samples of T2DM patients were analysed using support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, revealing SERPINA3 as a significantly upregulated gene in DCI. Experimental validation via Western blot confirmed elevated SERPINA3 protein levels in DCI patient plasma. Molecular docking demonstrated the stable binding of sulfonylurea hypoglycaemic agents, such as gliclazide and glimepiride, to SERPINA3, with binding energies of −6.8 and −6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These findings suggest that SERPINA3 plays a pivotal role in DCI pathogenesis and that sulfonylurea drugs may exert neuroprotective effects through SERPINA3-mediated pathways. This study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of DCI and highlights the potential of SERPINA3-targeted therapies for early intervention and treatment. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in larger cohorts and explore their clinical applicability. Full article

Sulfonylureas (SUs)—a class of drugs primarily used to treat type 2 diabetes—have recently attracted interest for their potential anticancer properties. While some studies have explored the chemical modification or design of new SU derivatives, our work instead centers on biological evaluations of all commercially available SUs in combination with doxorubicin (DOXO). These antidiabetic agents act by stimulating insulin secretion via K_ATP channel inhibition, and because K_ATP channels share structural features with ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters involved in multidrug resistance (e.g., P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and MRP2), SUs may also reduce cancer cell drug efflux. In this study, we systematically examined each commercially available SU for potential synergy with DOXO in a panel of human cancer cell lines. Notably, combining DOXO with glimepiride (GLIM), the newest SU, results in a 4.4-fold increase in cytotoxicity against MCF-7 breast cancer cells relative to DOXO alone. Mechanistic studies suggest that the observed synergy may arise from increased intracellular accumulation of DOXO. Preliminary in vivo experiments support these findings, showing that DOXO (5 mg/kg, i.v.) plus GLIM (4 mg/kg, i.p.) is more effective at inhibiting 4T1 tumor growth in mice than DOXO alone. Additionally, we show that adding a small amount of the surfactant Tween-80 to culture media affects SU binding to bovine serum albumin (BSA), potentially unmasking anticancer effects of SUs that strongly bind to proteins. Overall, these results underscore the potential of repurposing existing SUs to enhance standard chemotherapy regimens. Full article

New onset diabetes mellitus after organ transplantation (NODAT) is a frequent and serious complication of solid organ transplantation. It significantly impacts graft function, patient survival, and quality of life. NODAT is diagnosed based on the criteria for type 2 diabetes, with the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) serving as the gold standard for diagnosis. The development of NODAT is influenced by a range of risk factors, which are classified into modifiable and non-modifiable categories. Post-transplant, regular glycemic monitoring at specific intervals is essential for timely diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Early intervention can help prevent or delay the onset of diabetes-related complications. The treatment strategy for NODAT involves lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions. These include medications such as metformin, sulfonylureas, glinides, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and insulin. Adjusting immunosuppressive therapy—either by reducing dosages or substituting drugs with lower diabetogenic potential—is a common preventative and therapeutic measure. However, this must be performed cautiously to avoid acute graft rejection, which poses a greater risk to the patient compared to NODAT itself. In addition to managing diabetes, addressing comorbidities such as hypertension and dyslipidemia is crucial, as they elevate the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Patients with NODAT are also prone to developing common diabetes-related complications, including diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and peripheral vascular disease. Therefore, regular follow-ups and appropriate treatment are vital to maintaining quality of life and improving long-term outcomes. Full article

Background: Previous studies have suggested that antidiabetic drug use may be associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, these studies are limited by many confounding and reverse causality biases. We aimed to determine whether antidiabetic drug use has causal effects on ALS. Methods: Drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between genetic variation in the targets of antidiabetic drugs and ALS risk. The antidiabetic drugs included sulfonylureas, GLP-1 analogues, thiazolidinediones, insulin/insulin analogues, metformin, and SGLT2 inhibitors. Summary statistics for ALS were retrieved from previous genome-wide association studies comprising 27,205 ALS patients and 55,058 controls. The instrumental variables for these drugs are from previous published articles. Results: Genetic variation in SGLT2 inhibition targets was associated with lower risk of ALS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.14–0.74; p = 0.008). We did not find that genetic variation in metformin targets was associated with ALS (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 0.94–2.73; p = 0.081). Nevertheless, mitochondrial complex I, a target of metformin, was associated with a higher risk of ALS (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.01–3.32; p = 0.047). The analysis showed that genetic variation in sulfonylureas, GLP-1 analogues, thiazolidinediones, insulin or insulin analogues targets was not associated with ALS (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: The complex interaction between hypoglycemic, antioxidation, and anti-inflammatory effects may account for the different results across antidiabetic drug types. These findings provide key evidence to guide the use of antidiabetic drugs and will help to identify novel therapeutic targets in ALS. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate trends in antidiabetic drug use and assess the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A retrospective observational analysis based on the common data model was conducted using electronic medical records from 2010 to 2021. The patients included were aged ≥18, diagnosed with CKD and type 2 diabetes, and had received antidiabetic medications for ≥30 days. MALA was defined as pH ≤ 7.35 and arterial lactate ≥4 mmol/L. Results: A total of 8318 patients were included, with 6185 in CKD stages 1–2 and 2133 in stages 3a–5. Metformin monotherapy was the most prescribed regimen, except in stage 5 CKD. As CKD progressed, metformin use significantly declined; insulin and meglitinides were most frequently prescribed in end-stage renal disease. Over the study period, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (13.3%) and DPP-4 inhibitors (24.5%) increased significantly, while sulfonylurea use decreased (p < 0.05). Metformin use remained stable in earlier CKD stages but significantly decreased in stage 3b or worse. The incidence rate (IR) of MALA was 1.22 per 1000 patient-years, with a significantly increased IR in stage 4 or worse CKD (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Metformin was the most prescribed antidiabetic drug in CKD patients in Korea with a low risk of MALA. Antidiabetic drug use patterns varied across CKD stages, with a notable decline in metformin use in advanced CKD and a rise in SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions, underscoring the need for further optimized therapy. Full article

Understanding the interaction between pharmaceuticals and serum proteins is crucial for optimizing therapeutic strategies, especially in patients with coexisting chronic diseases. The primary goal of this study was to assess the potential changes in binding affinity and competition between glipizide (GLP, a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic drug) and losartan (LOS, a medication commonly prescribed for hypertension, particularly for patients with concurrent diabetes) with non-glycated (HSA) and glycated (gHSA_GLC, gHSA_FRC) human serum albumin using multiple spectroscopic techniques (fluorescence, UV-visible absorption, and circular dichroism spectroscopy). The results indicated that FRC is a more effective glycation agent for HSA than GLC, significantly altering the albumin structure and affecting the microenvironment around critical amino acid residues, Trp-214 and Tyr. These modifications reduce the binding affinity of LOS and GLP to gHSA_GLC and gHSA_FRC, compared to HSA, resulting in less stable drug–protein complexes. The study revealed that LOS and GLP interact nonspecifically with the hydrophobic regions of the albumin surface in both binary (ligand–albumin) and ternary systems (ligand–albumin–ligand_const) and specifically saturate the binding sites within the protein molecule. Furthermore, the presence of an additional drug (GLP in the LOS–albumin complex or LOS in the GLP–albumin complex) complicates the interactions, likely leading to competitive binding or displacement of the initially bound drug in both non-glycated and glycated albumins. Analysis of the CD spectra suggests mutual interactions between GLP and LOS, underscoring the importance of closely monitoring patients co-administered these drugs, to ensure optimal therapeutic efficacy and safety. Full article

Sulfonylureas (SUs) are a class of antidiabetic drugs widely used in the management of diabetes mellitus type 2. They promote insulin secretion by inhibiting the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in pancreatic β-cells. Recently, the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) was identified as a new class of target proteins of SUs that might contribute to their antidiabetic effect, through the activation of the Ras-like guanosine triphosphatase Rap1, which has been controversially discussed. We used human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells expressing genetic constructs of various Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensors containing different versions of Epac1 and Epac2 isoforms, alone or fused to different phosphodiesterases (PDEs), to monitor SU-induced conformational changes in Epac or direct PDE inhibition in real time. We show that SUs can both induce conformational changes in the Epac2 protein but not in Epac1, and directly inhibit the PDE3 and PDE4 families, thereby increasing cAMP levels in the direct vicinity of these PDEs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the binding site of SUs in Epac2 is distinct from that of cAMP and is located between the amino acids E443 and E460. Using biochemical assays, we could also show that tolbutamide can inhibit PDE activity through an allosteric mechanism. Therefore, the cAMP-elevating capacity due to allosteric PDE inhibition in addition to direct Epac activation may contribute to the therapeutic effects of SU drugs. Full article

Metformin, one of the most frequently used oral glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), is associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in approximately 20% of users. These unwanted actions result in non-compliance or even discontinuation of metformin therapy. The aim of the presented meta-analysis was to determine whether adding a drug from the group of sulfonylureas, glitazones, DPP-IV inhibitors, or probiotics to metformin monotherapy may affect the risk of GI side effects. The material for this meta-analysis comprised data from 26 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published in English. This meta-analysis included 41,048 patients. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases were thoroughly searched to find relevant RCTs. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Type (PICOT) structure was used to formulate study selection criteria and the research question. Cochrane Review Manager Software 5.4 was used to carry out analysis of collected data. The results were presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each group, and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. As expected from clinical practice, metformin was associated with a markedly increased risk of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting compared to placebo. In comparison to other GLDs, taking metformin was related to an elevated risk of diarrhea and abdominal pain and to a lowered risk of vomiting and bloating. In turn, adding other GLDs to metformin treatment was associated with an elevated risk of nausea and vomiting than treatment with metformin in monotherapy. However, adding probiotics to metformin therapy was related to a decreased risk of diarrhea, bloating, and constipation. The obtained results demonstrate that the combination of metformin with other GLDs may elevate the risk of nausea and vomiting, whereas combination with probiotics decreases the risk of diarrhea, bloating, and constipation. Thus, the results of our meta-analysis suggest that probiotics may reduce the risk of some GI side effects in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who started treatment with metformin. Full article

Currently, there is no known cure for diabetes. Different pharmaceutical therapies have been approved for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), some are in clinical trials and they have been classified according to their route or mechanism of action. Insulin types, sulfonylureas, biguanides, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, sodium–glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors, and incretin-dependent therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: GLP-1R, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors: DPP-4). Although some of the currently available drugs are effective in the management of T2DM, the side effects resulting from prolonged use of these drugs remain a serious challenge. GLP-1R agonists are currently the preferred medications to include when oral metformin alone is insufficient to manage T2DM. Medicinal plants now play prominent roles in the management of various diseases globally because they are readily available and affordable as well as having limited and transient side effects. Recently, studies have reported the ability of phytochemicals to activate glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R), acting as an agonist just like the GLP-1R agonist with beneficial effects in the management of T2DM. Consequently, we propose that careful exploration of phytochemicals for the development of novel therapeutic candidates as GLP-1R agonists will be a welcome breakthrough in the management of T2DM and the co-morbidities associated with T2DM. Full article

Backgrounds and Objectives: Using certain medications during an intercurrent illness can increase the risk of drug related problems (DRP) occurring such as acute kidney injury (AKI). Medications that increase this risk include sulfonylureas, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, metformin, angiotensin receptor blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs, and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SADMANS). Sick day medication guidance (SDMG) recommends withholding SADMANS medications during an intercurrent illness where adequate fluid intake cannot be maintained. But uptake of these recommendations is poor, and it is not known whether Australian pharmacists currently provide these recommendations during home medicine reviews (HMR) as per SDMG. We aimed to gain an understanding of the characteristics of DRP identified by pharmacists during HMR, especially those relating to SADMANS medications. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of 201 randomly selected HMR reports, conducted by accredited pharmacists from 2020 to 2022, that were analysed in 2023. All DRP and recommendations were categorised using a modified DOCUMENT system. Results: Overall, over 98% of participants experienced a DRP and a total of 710 DRP were found, where participants experienced an average of 4.0 ± 2.0 DRP each. Non-SADMANS medications accounted for 83.1% of all DRPs, with nervous system medications contributing the most. Common problems seen in non-SADMANS medications were related to toxicity, over/underdosing and undertreating. Diuretics contributed most to DRP in SADMANS medications. Problems with SADMANS were mainly related to toxicity and contraindications. No pharmacists provided SDMG despite 71.1% of participants using at least one SADMANS medication. Conclusions: We conclude that DRP remain prevalent in community pharmacy settings. Sick day recommendations were not provided in the HMRs included in our study, possibly due to lack of pharmacist knowledge and awareness. To ensure best practice, more research should be conducted to determine pharmacists’ knowledge of and barriers to provision of sick day recommendations. Full article