Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SScF)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 4044 KiB  
Article
Bioethanol Production from Steam-Exploded Barley Straw by Co-Fermentation with Escherichia coli SL100
by Manuel J. Díaz, Manuel Moya and Eulogio Castro
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 874; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040874 - 2 Apr 2022
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4078
Abstract
Second-generation bioethanol is considered a suitable option for replacing fossil fuels. Agricultural residues are being studied as feedstocks for sugar generation, which are in turn converted into ethanol. Among them, barley straw (BS) is a promising raw material, due to its high abundance, [...] Read more.
Second-generation bioethanol is considered a suitable option for replacing fossil fuels. Agricultural residues are being studied as feedstocks for sugar generation, which are in turn converted into ethanol. Among them, barley straw (BS) is a promising raw material, due to its high abundance, lignocellulosic composition and lack of other practical applications. Under these assumptions, the central aim of this study is to suggest an efficient bioethanol production scheme from BS at different levels of integration in co-fermentation with Escherichia coli SL100, including separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation (SHCF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and presaccharification and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (PSSCF), using the water-insoluble solid (WIS) and slurry fractions obtained after steam explosion (SE) pretreatment. The best results in terms of ethanol yield were achieved following the SHCF process, using the WIS and the slurry as substrates, with yields of 89.1% and 78.8% of the theoretical maximum, respectively. Considering all of the above points, the following scheme is proposed for the conversion of BS into ethanol: SE pretreatment (160 °C, 30 min) of BS previously soaked overnight in 2.88% w/v phosphoric acid solution, filtration of the slurry, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and co-fermentation of the two fractions obtained separately, with previous detoxification of the prehydrolysate with ammonium hydroxide (5 N). Under these conditions, 19.43 g of bioethanol was produced from 100 g of BS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4189 KiB  
Article
Coprocessing Corn Germ Meal for Oil Recovery and Ethanol Production: A Process Model for Lipid-Producing Energy Crops
by Yuyao Jia, Deepak Kumar, Jill K. Winkler-Moser, Bruce Dien, Kent Rausch, Mike E. Tumbleson and Vijay Singh
Processes 2022, 10(4), 661; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040661 - 29 Mar 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3518
Abstract
Efforts to engineer high-productivity crops to accumulate oils in their vegetative tissue present the possibility of expanding biodiesel production. However, processing the new crops for lipid recovery and ethanol production from cell wall saccharides is challenging and expensive. In a previous study using [...] Read more.
Efforts to engineer high-productivity crops to accumulate oils in their vegetative tissue present the possibility of expanding biodiesel production. However, processing the new crops for lipid recovery and ethanol production from cell wall saccharides is challenging and expensive. In a previous study using corn germ meal as a model substrate, we reported that liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment enriched the lipid concentration by 2.2 to 4.2 fold. This study investigated combining oil recovery with ethanol production by extracting oil following LHW and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) of the biomass. Corn germ meal was again used to model the oil-bearing energy crops. Pretreated germ meal hydrolysate or solids (160 and 180 °C for 10 min) were fermented, and lipids were extracted from both the spent fermentation whole broth and fermentation solids, which were recovered by centrifugation and convective drying. Lipid contents in spent fermentation solids increased 3.7 to 5.7 fold compared to the beginning germ meal. The highest lipid yield achieved after fermentation was 36.0 mg lipid g−1 raw biomass; the maximum relative amount of triacylglycerol (TAG) was 50.9% of extracted oil. Although the fermentation step increased the lipid concentration of the recovered solids, it did not improve the lipid yields of pretreated biomass and detrimentally affected oil compositions by increasing the relative concentrations of free fatty acids. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Chemical and Biochemical Processes for Energy Sources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1529 KiB  
Article
Economic Analysis of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse Using a Sequential Deacetylation, Hot Water and Disk-Refining Pretreatment
by Ming-Hsun Cheng, Zhaoqin Wang, Bruce S. Dien, Patricia J. W. Slininger and Vijay Singh
Processes 2019, 7(10), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100642 - 20 Sep 2019
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 12520
Abstract
A new process for conversion of sugarcane bagasse to ethanol was analyzed for production costs and energy consumption using experimental results. The process includes a sequential three-stage deacetylation, hot water, and disk-refining pretreatment and a commercial glucose-xylose fermenting S. cerevisiae strain. The simultaneous [...] Read more.
A new process for conversion of sugarcane bagasse to ethanol was analyzed for production costs and energy consumption using experimental results. The process includes a sequential three-stage deacetylation, hot water, and disk-refining pretreatment and a commercial glucose-xylose fermenting S. cerevisiae strain. The simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SScF) step used was investigated at two solids loadings: 10% and 16% w/w. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for the major operating parameters. The minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) varied between $4.91and $4.52/gal ethanol. The higher SScF solids loading (16%) reduced the total operating, utilities, and production costs by 9.5%, 15.6%, and 5.6%, respectively. Other important factors in determining selling price were costs for fermentation medium and enzymes (e.g., cellulases). Hence, these findings support operating at high solids and producing enzymes onsite as strategies to minimize MESP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Food Process Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4120 KiB  
Article
Ethanol Production by Soy Fiber Treatment and Simultaneous Saccharification and Co-Fermentation in an Integrated Corn-Soy Biorefinery
by Jasreen K. Sekhon, Devin Maurer, Tong Wang, Stephanie Jung and Kurt A. Rosentrater
Fermentation 2018, 4(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation4020035 - 16 May 2018
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6053
Abstract
Insoluble fiber (IF) recovered from the enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction process (EAEP) of soybeans is a fraction rich in carbohydrates and proteins. It can be used to enhance ethanol production in an integrated corn-soy biorefinery, which combines EAEP with traditional corn-based ethanol processing. The [...] Read more.
Insoluble fiber (IF) recovered from the enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction process (EAEP) of soybeans is a fraction rich in carbohydrates and proteins. It can be used to enhance ethanol production in an integrated corn-soy biorefinery, which combines EAEP with traditional corn-based ethanol processing. The present study evaluated IF as a substrate for ethanol production. The effects of treatment of IF (soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA), liquid hot water (LHW), and enzymatic hydrolysis), primarily simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), as well as scaling up (250 mL to 60 L) on ethanol production from IF alone or a corn and IF slurry were investigated. Enzymatic hydrolysis (pectinase, cellulase, and xylanase, each added at 5% soy solids during simultaneous saccharification and fermentation/SSCF) was the best treatment to maximize ethanol production from IF. Ethanol yield almost doubled when SSCF of IF was performed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli KO11. Addition of IF in dry-grind corn fermentation increased the ethanol production rate (~31%), but low ethanol tolerance of E. coli KO11 was a limiting factor for employing SSCF in combination corn and IF fermentation. Nonlinear Monod modeling accurately predicted the effect of ethanol concentration on E. coli KO11 growth kinetics by Hanes-Woolf linearization. Collectively, the results from this study suggest a potential of IF as a substrate, alone or in dry-grind corn fermentation, where it enhances the ethanol production rate. IF can be incorporated in the current bioethanol industry with no added capital investment, except enzymes. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop