Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = self-regulated break taking

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 3689 KB  
Article
Investigating the Effectiveness of Self-Regulated, Pomodoro, and Flowtime Break-Taking Techniques Among Students
by Eva J. C. Smits, Niklas Wenzel and Anique de Bruin
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070861 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 11282
Abstract
Effective break taking during study sessions is crucial for maintaining performance, especially in self-regulated learning settings where students plan their own tasks. However, research on break taking in these contexts is limited. This study investigates the effect of self-regulated, Pomodoro, and Flowtime breaks [...] Read more.
Effective break taking during study sessions is crucial for maintaining performance, especially in self-regulated learning settings where students plan their own tasks. However, research on break taking in these contexts is limited. This study investigates the effect of self-regulated, Pomodoro, and Flowtime breaks on subjective study experiences, task completion, and flow. Ninety-four university students participated in an online intervention that provided instruction on how to take breaks in a 2 h authentic study session. In the self-regulated break condition (n = 25), students decided when and how long to take breaks. In the Pomodoro condition (n = 36), students took 5 min breaks after every 25 min of studying. In the Flowtime group (n = 33), participants decided when to take breaks; however, the break duration was determined based on prior study duration. Results showed that Pomodoro breaks led to a faster increase in fatigue, and Pomodoro and Flowtime breaks led to a faster decrease in motivation compared with self-regulated breaks; however, these differences did not result in overall differences in fatigue or motivation levels between conditions. Similarly, no differences were found in productivity levels, task completion, and flow. Future research should further examine these techniques by including variables like personality and mental effort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Educational Applications of Cognitive Psychology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 700 KB  
Article
Daring and Distress: Insights on Adolescent Risk Taking and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation from a Network Analysis Perspective
by Luca Cerniglia, Silvia Cimino, Renata Tambelli and Marco Lauriola
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(9), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091248 - 26 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3777
Abstract
We explored the interrelationships between risk-taking and self-harm in typically developing adolescents by examining various contributing factors, such as personality traits, difficulties in emotion regulation, attachment styles, and maladaptive psychological functioning. A sample of 234 Italian adolescents completed the Risk-Taking and Self-Harm Inventory [...] Read more.
We explored the interrelationships between risk-taking and self-harm in typically developing adolescents by examining various contributing factors, such as personality traits, difficulties in emotion regulation, attachment styles, and maladaptive psychological functioning. A sample of 234 Italian adolescents completed the Risk-Taking and Self-Harm Inventory for Adolescents (RTSHIA), the Risk-Taking Questionnaire (RT-18), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Strategies (DERS), the State Adult Attachment Measure (SAAM), and the Youth Self-Report (YSR). Network analysis was used to visualize and describe the interdependencies among the variables. Risk-taking behaviors were strongly linked to rule-breaking, aggression, and risk propensity, while self-harm behaviors were connected to limited access to emotion regulation strategies and thought problems. Centrality indices indicated that variables such as anxiety/depression, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and rule-breaking had a high influence within the network. This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the nomological network of risk-taking and self-harm behaviors among adolescents. It highlighted the relative importance of factors such as emotion regulation difficulties and maladaptive psychological functioning in influencing these behaviors. The findings could inform psychological interventions and prevention strategies targeting adolescents at risk for engaging in risk-taking or self-harm behaviors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 373 KB  
Article
Learner Experience of an Online Co-Learning Model to Support Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
by Catherine Briand, Regis Hakin, Julio Macario de Medeiros, Francesca Luconi, Brigitte Vachon, Marie-Josée Drolet, Antoine Boivin, Catherine Vallée and Sarah Montminy
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(3), 2498; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032498 - 31 Jan 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2628
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of the population such as increased levels of anxiety, psychological distress, isolation, etc. Access to mental health services has been limited due to the “overflow” of demands. The Recovery College (RC) [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of the population such as increased levels of anxiety, psychological distress, isolation, etc. Access to mental health services has been limited due to the “overflow” of demands. The Recovery College (RC) model, an education-based approach, has addressed this challenge and provided online well-being and mental health courses to at-risk populations. The RC model proposes a co-learning space in an adult education program where learners from diverse backgrounds collectively learn and empower themselves to better address psychological well-being and mental health issues. The aim of this study was to document the experience of learners who participated in online RC courses during the COVID-19 pandemic and the perceived impact of these courses on their mental health. A qualitative interpretative descriptive study design was employed, and Miles and Huberman’s stepwise content analysis method was used to mine the data for themes. Fourteen structured online interviews were conducted with a sample representative of the diversity of learners. Five categories of themes emerged: (1) updating and validating your mental health knowledge, (2) taking care of yourself and your mental health, (3) improving and modifying your behaviors and practices, (4) changing how you look at yourself and others, and (5) interacting and connecting with others. Results suggest that online RC courses can be an effective strategy for supporting individual self-regulation and empowerment, breaking social isolation, and reducing the effects of stress in times of social confinement measures and limited access to care. Full article
26 pages, 1961 KB  
Article
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy
by Xiao Li, Gang Liu, Qinghua Fu, Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman, Abdelrhman Meero and Muhammad Safdar Sial
Sustainability 2022, 14(1), 531; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010531 - 4 Jan 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4945
Abstract
This study analyzes the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) fulfillment on corporate risk-taking to assist stakeholders in identifying the “double-edged sword” role of CSR activities and provide empirical evidence for enterprises to properly carry out CSR activities. The results show that the [...] Read more.
This study analyzes the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) fulfillment on corporate risk-taking to assist stakeholders in identifying the “double-edged sword” role of CSR activities and provide empirical evidence for enterprises to properly carry out CSR activities. The results show that the self-interest instrumentalization of CSR activities intensifies agency conflict, and CSR fulfillment weakens risk-taking to a certain extent. When CSR fulfillment reaches a certain value, CSR activities can improve risk-taking. Then, CSR fulfillment and risk-taking show a U-shaped relationship. Further analysis shows that the impacts of CSR on debt financing and R&D input reflect the U-shaped effect pathways of CSR fulfillment on risk-taking. Finally, it is suggested that CSR activities should be avoided to become the “self-interest tool” of the management. The regulators guide enterprises to break through the inflection point of the U-shaped effect and consider more for the stakeholders’ overall interests. Additionally, the regulators establish an effective compensation system to ensure that the enterprises with adequate CSR fulfillment obtain high-quality capital resources and promote the sustainable development of the capital market. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 290 KB  
Article
Appraising and Handling COVID-19 Information: A Qualitative Study
by Morhaf Al Achkar, Matthew J. Thompson, Diem Nguyen and Theresa J. Hoeft
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(19), 10382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910382 - 2 Oct 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2503
Abstract
Background. The coronavirus pandemic brought vast quantities of new information to the public for rapid consumption. This study explored how people most impacted by the pandemic have judged and perceived the quality of information regarding COVID-19 and regulated the information flow. Methods. This [...] Read more.
Background. The coronavirus pandemic brought vast quantities of new information to the public for rapid consumption. This study explored how people most impacted by the pandemic have judged and perceived the quality of information regarding COVID-19 and regulated the information flow. Methods. This was a qualitative study of semi-structured interviews developed as a pragmatic study targeting several groups most impacted by the pandemic. Participants were identified through convenience, purposive, and snowball sampling methods. They were interviewed by phone or video conference. Results. Twenty-five participants were interviewed between 6 April 2020 and 1 May 2020. In terms of verifying information and judging its quality, people judged information by the source. People compared information across sources and attempted to verify the quality. Most felt self-assured about their capacity to judge information. Regarding the quality of information, many participants felt the information was skewed or inaccurate. Contradictory information was confusing, especially with a strong suspicion of ulterior motives of information sources impacting trust in the provided information. Yet, some recognized the iterative process of healthcare-related information. In terms of regulating information flow, many participants perceived flooding with information. To counter information overload, some became selective with types of information input. Many developed the habit of taking breaks periodically. Conclusion. Improving risk communication in a pandemic is of paramount importance. Organizations working in public health must develop ways to regulate information flow in collaboration with trusted community partners. Individuals also must develop strategies to improve information management. Full article
33 pages, 353 KB  
Review
Regulation of Germinal Center Reactions by B and T Cells
by Young Uk Kim, Xindong Liu, Shinya Tanaka, Dat Quoc Tran and Yeonseok Chung
Antibodies 2013, 2(4), 554-586; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib2040554 - 23 Oct 2013
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 18192
Abstract
Break of B cell tolerance to self-antigens results in the development of autoantibodies and, thus, leads to autoimmunity. How B cell tolerance is maintained during active germinal center (GC) reactions is yet to be fully understood. Recent advances revealed several subsets of T [...] Read more.
Break of B cell tolerance to self-antigens results in the development of autoantibodies and, thus, leads to autoimmunity. How B cell tolerance is maintained during active germinal center (GC) reactions is yet to be fully understood. Recent advances revealed several subsets of T cells and B cells that can positively or negatively regulate GC B cell responses in vivo. IL-21-producing CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells comprise a distinct lineage of helper T cells—termed follicular helper T cells (TFH)—that can provide help for the development of GC reactions where somatic hypermutation and affinity maturation take place. Although the function of TFH cells is beneficial in generating high affinity antibodies against infectious agents, aberrant activation of TFH cell or B cell to self-antigens results in autoimmunity. At least three subsets of immune cells have been proposed as regulatory cells that can limit such antibody-mediated autoimmunity, including follicular regulatory T cells (TFR), Qa-1 restricted CD8+ regulatory T cells (CD8+TREG), and regulatory B cells (BREG). In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of GC B cell regulation with specific emphasis on the newly identified immune cell subsets involved in this process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue B Cells and Immunological Tolerance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop