Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = revised Tokuhashi score

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 806 KB  
Article
Intratumoral Flow Void Diameter as a Predictor of High Intraoperative Blood Loss in Palliative Excisional Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors
by Yuji Ishino, Satoshi Kato, Noriaki Yokogawa, Takaki Shimizu, Masafumi Kawai, Takaaki Uto, Kazuhiro Nanpo, Megumu Kawai and Satoru Demura
Cancers 2024, 16(24), 4124; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16244124 - 10 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1730
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) is one of the major complications in metastatic spinal tumor surgery (MSTS), and understanding the predictors of this risk is essential. This study aimed to determine the impact of the intratumoral flow void (IFV) observed on standard [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) is one of the major complications in metastatic spinal tumor surgery (MSTS), and understanding the predictors of this risk is essential. This study aimed to determine the impact of the intratumoral flow void (IFV) observed on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its association with IBL in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 88 palliative excisional surgeries performed at a single hospital between 2010 and 2024. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, histological tumor type, spinal instability neoplastic score, revised Tokuhashi score, preoperative radiation, presence of IFV, and IFV diameter were assessed in addition to surgical details such as the number of resected and instrumented vertebrae and surgical duration. Results: Of the 88 patients, 71 (80.7%) exhibited IFV, with a mean IFV diameter of 1.8 ± 1.3 mm. The univariate analysis identified a significant association between IBL and several factors, including the presence of IFV, IFV diameter, hypervascular tumor type, number of instrumented vertebrae, and surgical duration. The multivariate analysis indicated that IFV diameter had the highest standardized coefficient among the examined variables, suggesting its strong potential as a predictor of IBL. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify the IFV diameter as a critical and independent predictor of IBL in MSTS. IFV diameter, which can be easily assessed using standard MRI, should be considered in surgical planning to effectively manage bleeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Spine Tumor)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2998 KB  
Article
Indications and Limits of Surgery for Spinal Metastases Derived from Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Experience
by Silvia Terzi, Federica Trentin, Cristiana Griffoni, Elisa Carretta, Stefano Bandiera, Cristina Ferrari, Fabio Vita, Alberto Righi, Margherita Maioli, Dario De Biase, Annalisa Monetta, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco Girolami, Valerio Pipola, Marco Gambarotti and Alessandro Gasbarrini
Diagnostics 2023, 13(12), 2093; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122093 - 16 Jun 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3316
Abstract
Lung cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world, and surgery is an integral part of the treatment for spinal metastases. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess the overall survival of surgically treated patients affected by lung [...] Read more.
Lung cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world, and surgery is an integral part of the treatment for spinal metastases. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess the overall survival of surgically treated patients affected by lung cancer spinal metastases and identify any factors related to a better survival rate. We recruited 56 consecutive patients (34 male and 22 female) surgically treated for metastatic lung cancer in the spine from 2009 to 2019. Surgical indications were based on a previously published and validated flow chart following a multidisciplinary evaluation. We assessed the localization of vertebral metastases, the presence of other bone or visceral metastases, neurological status according to the Frankel score, ambulatory autonomy, and general status, measured with the Karnofsky performance scale. The expected prognosis was retrospectively assessed according to the revised Tokuhashi score. The median survival was 8.1 months, with over a third of patients surviving more than 1 year. We observed a global improvement in all clinical parameters after surgical treatment. The Tokuhashi predictive score did not correlate with survival after surgery. The results of this study suggest that the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases from lung cancer can improve quality of life, even in patients with a shorter life expectancy, by controlling pain and improving autonomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1384 KB  
Article
Risk Factors for Poor Outcome after Palliative Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors
by Akinobu Suzuki, Hidetomi Terai, Shinji Takahashi, Minori Kato, Hiromitsu Toyoda, Koji Tamai, Yusuke Hori, Yuki Okamura and Hiroaki Nakamura
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3442; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103442 - 13 May 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2376
Abstract
Palliative surgery is performed to improve the quality of life of patients with spinal metastases. However, it is sometimes difficult to achieve the expected results because the patient’s condition, and risk factors related to poor outcomes have not been well elucidated. This study [...] Read more.
Palliative surgery is performed to improve the quality of life of patients with spinal metastases. However, it is sometimes difficult to achieve the expected results because the patient’s condition, and risk factors related to poor outcomes have not been well elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes and investigate the risk factors for poor outcomes after palliative surgery for spinal metastasis. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 117 consecutive patients who underwent palliative surgery for spinal metastases. Neurological and ambulatory statuses were evaluated pre- and post-operatively. Poor outcomes were defined as no improvement or deterioration in functional status or early mortality, and the related risk factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed neurological improvement in 48% and ambulatory improvement in 70% of the patients with preoperative impairment, whereas 18% of the patients showed poor outcomes. In the multivariate analysis, low hemoglobin levels and low revised Tokuhashi scores were identified as risk factors for poor outcomes. The present results suggest that anemia and low revised Tokuhashi scores are related not only to life expectancy but also to functional recovery after surgery. Treatment options should be carefully selected for the patients with these factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 916 KB  
Article
Survival and Functional Outcomes after Surgical Treatment for Spinal Metastasis in Patients with a Short Life Expectancy
by Se-Jun Park, Chang-Hyun Ma, Chong-Suh Lee, Chung-Youb Jeon, Tae-Soo Shin and Jin-Sung Park
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010046 - 21 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3871
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the survival and functional outcome after surgery in spinal metastasis patients with a short life expectancy and to compare the baseline characteristics based on 3-month survival. A total of 492 surgical treatment cases with a preoperative revised Tokuhashi [...] Read more.
This study aimed to analyze the survival and functional outcome after surgery in spinal metastasis patients with a short life expectancy and to compare the baseline characteristics based on 3-month survival. A total of 492 surgical treatment cases with a preoperative revised Tokuhashi score 8were reviewed. Median survival was calculated and Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to analyze the survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The surgical period was divided into three time frames to examine the time trends. For the functional outcome, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was analyzed. This study categorized subjects based on 3-month survival and compared the baseline characteristics. The median overall survival was 10.6 months. The 2013–2020 period showed a significantly better median survival than the other two periods (p < 0.001). Lung and kidney cancers showed a significant survival improvement in 2013–2020 (p < 0.001). Patients with ECOG-PS 2 increased from 37.4% preoperatively to 63.7% postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were significantly more cases of preoperative favorable performance status, slow and moderate growth cancers, and chemotherapy after surgery in the survival ≥3 months group. Depending on the type of primary cancer, surgery can be considered even in spinal metastasis patients with a short life expectancy, particularly those with a good performance status. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1187 KB  
Article
Optimization of Tokuhashi Scoring System to Improve Survival Prediction in Patients with Spinal Metastases
by Hung-Kuan Yen, Chih-Wei Chen, Wei-Hsin Lin, Zhong-Yu Wang, Chuan-Ching Huang, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Shu-Hua Yang and Ming-Hsiao Hu
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(18), 5391; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185391 - 14 Sep 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2879
Abstract
Introduction: Predicting survival time for patients with spinal metastases is important in treatment choice. Generally speaking, six months is a landmark cutoff point. Revised Tokuhashi score (RTS), the most widely used scoring system, lost its accuracy in predicting 6-month survival, gradually. Therefore, a [...] Read more.
Introduction: Predicting survival time for patients with spinal metastases is important in treatment choice. Generally speaking, six months is a landmark cutoff point. Revised Tokuhashi score (RTS), the most widely used scoring system, lost its accuracy in predicting 6-month survival, gradually. Therefore, a more precise scoring system is urgently needed. Objective: The aim of this study is to create a new scoring system with a higher accuracy in predicting 6-month survival based on the previously used RTS. Methods: Data of 171 patients were examined to determine factors that affect prognosis (reference group), and the remaining (validation group) were examined to validate the reliability of a new score, adjusted Tokuhashi score (ATS). We compared their discriminatory abilities of the prediction models using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Target therapy and the Z score of BMI (Z-BMI), which adjusted to the patients’ sex and age, were additional independent prognostic factors. Patients with target therapy use are awarded 4 points. The Z score of BMI could be added directly to yield ATS. The AUCs were 0.760 for ATS and 0.636 for RTS in the validation group. Conclusion: Appropriate target therapy use can prolong patients’ survival. Z-BMI which might reflect nutritional status is another important influencing factor. With the optimization, surgeons could choose a more individualized treatment for patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 600 KB  
Article
Prognosis after Palliative Surgery for Patients with Spinal Metastasis: Comparison of Predicted and Actual Survival
by Hideaki Nakajima, Shuji Watanabe, Kazuya Honjoh, Yuya Izubuchi, Yumiko Watanabe, Takaaki Tanaka and Akihiko Matsumine
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 3868; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163868 - 10 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3316
Abstract
Prediction of prognosis is a key factor in therapeutic decision making due to recent the development of therapeutic options for spinal metastases. The aim of the study was to examine predictive scoring systems and identify prognostic factors for 6–month mortality after palliative surgery. [...] Read more.
Prediction of prognosis is a key factor in therapeutic decision making due to recent the development of therapeutic options for spinal metastases. The aim of the study was to examine predictive scoring systems and identify prognostic factors for 6–month mortality after palliative surgery. The participants were 75 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery and had a minimum follow–up period of 1 year. Associations of actual survival with categories based on the revised Tokuhashi score and new Katagiri score were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for 6–month mortality after palliative surgery. The median actual survival period was longer than those predicted using the scoring systems. However, 21.3% of patients died of cancers within 6 months after surgery. A higher CRP/albumin ratio (odds ratio: 0.39; cut–off 0.409) and absence of postoperative adjuvant therapy (odds ratio: 7.15) were independent risk factors for 6–month mortality. There was no association of mortality with primary site, severity of sarcopenia, or other biomarkers. These results suggest that careful consideration is needed to determine whether palliative surgery is the best option for patients with a high preoperative CRP/albumin ratio and/or absence of postoperative adjuvant therapy, regardless of predictions made from scoring systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop