Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (16)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = reproductive genetic carrier screening

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 321 KiB  
Article
The Spectrum and Carrier Frequencies of Common Pathogenic Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene Mutations in Men from the General Population: The Role of Ethnicity
by Ludmila Osadchuk, Mikhail Ivanov, Elena Komova and Alexander Osadchuk
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6625; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146625 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 391
Abstract
Mutations in the CFTR gene, which cause the autosomal recessive disease cystic fibrosis, can also affect male fertility. The aim of this study was to investigate the spectrum and carrier frequency of common pathogenic CFTR variants among men from the general population, analyze [...] Read more.
Mutations in the CFTR gene, which cause the autosomal recessive disease cystic fibrosis, can also affect male fertility. The aim of this study was to investigate the spectrum and carrier frequency of common pathogenic CFTR variants among men from the general population, analyze ethnic differences, and assess associations with male fertility indicators. Male volunteers (n = 1895) from six cities in Russia and Belarus were analyzed for the carrier frequencies of 17 pathogenic CFTR variants and two polymorphisms, as well as semen quality and reproductive hormone levels. Heterozygous carriers of six pathogenic CFTR mutations, F508del, G542X, N1303K, 3849+10kbC>T, CFTRdele2,3, and R117C, and two polymorphisms, IVS9-5T and 5T-(12-13) TG, were identified, with cumulative frequencies of 2.06% and 6.65%, respectively. Significant ethnic differences were revealed in the spectrum and carrier frequencies of pathogenic CFTR variants among Slavs, Buryats, and Yakuts. Slavs exhibited a high proportion of heterozygous carriers of CFTR mutations (2.70%), whereas none were detected among Buryats and Yakuts. The highest carrier frequency for the CFTR polymorphism was observed among Slavs (8.35%), followed by Buryats (5.83%) and Yakuts (1.36%). No association was found between the carriers of identified CFTR variants and male fertility indicators. Thus, the spectrum and carrier frequency of genetic CFTR variants are determined by the ethnic composition of the population, providing a basis for ethnicity-specific screening of pathogenic CFTR variants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research Insights in Cystic Fibrosis and CFTR-Related Diseases)
10 pages, 380 KiB  
Article
Couple-Based Carrier Screening: How Gene and Variant Considerations Impact Outcomes
by Eric Lee, Kaylee Orton, Edward Kwan, Claire Faga, Trang Le, Ranad Shaheen, Vivek Nair and Simon Cliffe
Genes 2025, 16(6), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16060671 - 30 May 2025
Viewed by 939
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The clinical utility of reproductive carrier screening varies based on the genes tested, variant reporting policies, and the screened patient population. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of carrier screening among reproductive couples undergoing testing in a routine clinical setting. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The clinical utility of reproductive carrier screening varies based on the genes tested, variant reporting policies, and the screened patient population. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of carrier screening among reproductive couples undergoing testing in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A total of 1595 couples, primarily referred by reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists, underwent couple-based carrier screening across 390 genes. Carrier states were assessed on a couple basis and reported only if a couple were at risk of having affected offspring. At-risk conditions were classified by severity, as well as their likelihood of clinical impact based on the specific variants detected in each at-risk couple. Secondary findings with potential personal utility were also evaluated. Results: Among the screened couples, 4.2% were at risk of having a child with a genetic condition. When limited to high-clinical-impact results, the at-risk couple rate decreased to 1.0%, with 44% of these cases involving CFTR, SMN1, or FMR1. Secondary findings were identified in 1.7% of individuals. Conclusions: Carrier screening for only CFTR, SMN1, and FMR1 will miss more than half of at-risk couples, underscoring the importance of broader carrier screening. Specific variants and their combinations can influence the predicted clinical impact of at-risk conditions, marking a key advantage of couple-based reporting. Secondary findings were common, highlighting the importance of discussing these potential findings during pre-test counselling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genetic Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1389 KiB  
Review
Psychosocial Factors Involved in Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review
by Samantha Strasser, Isabella R. McDonald, Melissa K. Uveges, Sharlene Hesse-Biber, Jordan Keels, Neil Smith and Andrew A. Dwyer
Genes 2025, 16(6), 614; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16060614 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 768
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Rare diseases are predominantly genetic in etiology and characterized by a prolonged ‘diagnostic odyssey’. Advances in genetic testing (GT) have helped shorten the time to diagnosis for rare/undiagnosed conditions. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on psychosocial factors related to GT [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Rare diseases are predominantly genetic in etiology and characterized by a prolonged ‘diagnostic odyssey’. Advances in genetic testing (GT) have helped shorten the time to diagnosis for rare/undiagnosed conditions. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on psychosocial factors related to GT for rare diseases to inform more person-centered approaches to care. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in six databases using structured terms (September 2024). Retrieved articles underwent independent dual review. Data were extracted and collated in tables for analysis. Thematic analysis was used to identify promoters/barriers to GT for patients and families. Findings were validated by a patient advocate and were reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Synthesized findings were mapped to the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform intervention development. Results: Of 1730 retrieved articles, 32 were included for data extraction/synthesis. Studies employed qualitative (n = 19), quantitative (n = 10), and mixed-methods (n = 3) approaches. Nearly all (29/32, 91%) were non-interventional, reporting on decision-making cognitions/processes (19/32, 59%), attitudes/preferences (15/32, 47%), psychosocial impact (6/32, 19%), and knowledge/awareness (4/32, 8%) of pre-conception/prenatal/diagnostic GT and carrier screening. Promoters included understanding GT, ending the diagnostic odyssey, actionable outcomes, personal/family history, altruism, and reproductive decision-making. Barriers included logistical (e.g., distance, cost), psychological burden, perceived lack of benefit, and discrimination/social stigma concerns. Conclusions: Some psychosocial factors related to GT for rare diseases overlap with those in literature on GT for common conditions. Identified factors represent targets for theory-informed, person-centered interventions to support high-quality GT decisions that are informed and aligned with patient/family values and preferences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 197 KiB  
Review
Ethical and Practical Considerations in Implementing Population-Based Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening
by Eva Van Steijvoort and Pascal Borry
Genes 2025, 16(4), 423; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040423 - 31 Mar 2025
Viewed by 849
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) has emerged as a promising tool for identifying couples with an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with an autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic condition. By enabling early detection, RGCS has the potential to support informed reproductive decision-making. [...] Read more.
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) has emerged as a promising tool for identifying couples with an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with an autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic condition. By enabling early detection, RGCS has the potential to support informed reproductive decision-making. Historically, carrier screening initiatives aimed to decrease the prevalence of specific genetic disorders by targeting particular high-risk populations. More recently, there has been a shift towards offering RGCS for a wider range of conditions, with the goal of enhancing reproductive autonomy by facilitating informed decision-making and addressing inequities in access to healthcare interventions. However, this shift towards a more inclusive, population-based approach has raised questions about the tension between individual autonomy and public health goals, as well as concerns regarding the potential negative effects of large-scale genetic screening initiatives. Furthermore, there is growing interest in utilizing RGCS data for broader purposes, such as population-based genetic screening programs for hereditary cancers or identifying causes of unexplained infertility, which may present additional ethical considerations. This review explores the complexities surrounding the implementation of RGCS, with an emphasis on its objectives, the significance of informed decision-making, and the wider societal challenges it may present. By analyzing these interconnected factors, we aim to provide a thorough understanding of the potential implications of RGCS on both individual autonomy and societal dynamics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Genetics: Diseases, Community, and Counseling)
13 pages, 3249 KiB  
Article
Rapid Genotyping of FecB Mutation in Sheep Using CRISPR-Cas12a Integrated with DNA Nanotree Biosensing Platform
by Dongxia Pan, Mukaddas Mijit, Hui Wang, Chaoqun Sun, Bantan Pingcuo, Zhixue Yu, Benhai Xiong and Xiangfang Tang
Biomolecules 2025, 15(3), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030315 - 20 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 720
Abstract
The A-to-G mutation (FecB) in the BMPR1B gene is strongly linked to fertility in sheep, significantly increasing ovulation rates and litter sizes compared to wild-type populations. The rapid and reliable screening of the FecB gene is therefore critical for advancing sheep [...] Read more.
The A-to-G mutation (FecB) in the BMPR1B gene is strongly linked to fertility in sheep, significantly increasing ovulation rates and litter sizes compared to wild-type populations. The rapid and reliable screening of the FecB gene is therefore critical for advancing sheep breeding programs. This study aimed to develop a fast and accurate method for detecting the FecB mutation and genotyping the gene to enhance sheep reproduction and productivity. To achieve this, we integrated the CRISPR-Cas12a system with an optimized amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). A similar DNA origami technique-based fluorescence reporter nanotree structure was synthesized using gold nanomagnetic beads as carriers to amplify the fluorescence signal further. The resulting biosensing platform, termed CRISPR-ARMS, demonstrated excellent sensitivity for detecting FecB mutations, with a detection limit as low as 0.02 pmol. Therefore, this innovative approach shows great promise for single-base mutation detection and represents a pioneering tool for high-yield genetic screening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics and Systems Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 232 KiB  
Article
Mosaicism for Autosomal Trisomies: A Comprehensive Analysis of 1266 Published Cases Focusing on Maternal Age and Reproductive History
by Natalia V. Kovaleva and Philip D. Cotter
Genes 2024, 15(6), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060778 - 13 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1406
Abstract
Mosaicism for autosomal trisomy is uncommon in clinical practice. However, despite its rarity among both prenatally and postnatally diagnoses, there are a large number of characterized and published cases. Surprisingly, in contrast to regular trisomies, no attempts at systematic analyses of mosaic carriers’ [...] Read more.
Mosaicism for autosomal trisomy is uncommon in clinical practice. However, despite its rarity among both prenatally and postnatally diagnoses, there are a large number of characterized and published cases. Surprisingly, in contrast to regular trisomies, no attempts at systematic analyses of mosaic carriers’ demographics were undertaken. This is the first study aimed to address this gap. For that, we have screened more than eight hundred publications on mosaic trisomies, reviewing data including gender and clinical status of mosaic carriers, maternal age and reproductive history. In total, 596 publications were eligible for analysis, containing data on 948 prenatal diagnoses, including true fetal mosaicism (TFM) and confined placental mosaicism (CPM), and on 318 cases of postnatally detected mosaicism (PNM). No difference was found in maternal age between normal pregnancy outcomes with appropriate birth weight and those with intrauterine growth restriction. Unexpectedly, a higher proportion of advanced maternal ages (AMA) was found in normal outcomes compared to abnormal ones (abnormal fetus or newborn) and fetal losses, 73% vs. 56% and 50%, p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0011, correspondingly. Another intriguing finding was a higher AMA proportion in mosaic carriers with concomitant uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosomes 7, 14, 15, and 16 compared to carriers with biparental disomy (BPD) (72% vs. 58%, 92% vs. 55%, 87% vs. 78%, and 65% vs. 24%, correspondingly); overall figures were 78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0026. Analysis of reproductive histories showed a very poor reporting but almost two-fold higher rate of mothers reporting a previous fetal loss from PNM cohort (in which almost all patients were clinically abnormal) compared to mothers from the TFM and CPM cohorts (with a large proportion of normal outcomes), 30% vs. 16%, p = 0.0072. The occurrence of a previous pregnancy with a chromosome abnormality was 1 in 13 in the prenatal cohort and 1 in 16 in the postnatal cohort, which are five-fold higher compared to published studies on non-mosaic trisomies. We consider the data obtained in this study to be preliminary despite the magnitude of the literature reviewed since reporting of detailed data was mostly poor, and therefore, the studied cohorts do not represent “big data”. Nevertheless, the information obtained is useful both for clinical genetic counseling and for modeling further studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Mosaicism in Human Development and Diseases)
14 pages, 1069 KiB  
Review
Reproductive Counseling and Care in Cystic Fibrosis: A Multidisciplinary Approach for a New Therapeutic Era
by Julie McGlynn, Joan K. DeCelie-Germana, Catherine Kier and Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Life 2023, 13(7), 1545; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071545 - 12 Jul 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3154
Abstract
With the advent of highly effective modulator therapies, many people with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living longer, healthier lives. Pregnancy rates for women with CF more than doubled between 2019 and 2021, reflecting increases in both planned and unplanned pregnancies. For men with [...] Read more.
With the advent of highly effective modulator therapies, many people with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living longer, healthier lives. Pregnancy rates for women with CF more than doubled between 2019 and 2021, reflecting increases in both planned and unplanned pregnancies. For men with CF, CF-associated infertility can be mitigated with assistive reproductive technology, yet patient knowledge of these challenges and options is variable. Preconception and prenatal counseling for individuals with CF and for parents of children with CF who wish to expand their families requires nuanced discussions to promote informed reproductive decisions, drawing from a combination of standard practice recommendations and CF-specific assessments. This review article synthesizes the current literature and practice recommendations regarding reproductive counseling and care in CF, outlining the role of genetic counseling, carrier screening, teratogen counseling, in vitro fertilization and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, and careful assessment and management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes when present. Via a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach, clinicians can support adults with CF and parents of children with CF as they make informed reproductive decisions and embark on family planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cystic Fibrosis: A Disease with a New Face)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2724 KiB  
Study Protocol
The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie’s Mission): Design and Implementation
by Alison D. Archibald, Belinda J. McClaren, Jade Caruana, Erin Tutty, Emily A. King, Jane L. Halliday, Stephanie Best, Anaita Kanga-Parabia, Bruce H. Bennetts, Corrina C. Cliffe, Evanthia O. Madelli, Gladys Ho, Jan Liebelt, Janet C. Long, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Jillian Kennedy, John Massie, Jon D. Emery, Julie McGaughran, Justine E. Marum, Kirsten Boggs, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Leslie Burnett, Lisa Dive, Lucinda Freeman, Mark R. Davis, Martin J. Downes, Mathew Wallis, Monica M. Ferrie, Nicholas Pachter, Paul A. Scuffham, Rachael Casella, Richard J. N. Allcock, Royston Ong, Samantha Edwards, Sarah Righetti, Sebastian Lunke, Sharon Lewis, Susan P. Walker, Tiffany F. Boughtwood, Tristan Hardy, Ainsley J. Newson, Edwin P. Kirk, Nigel G. Laing, Martin B. Delatycki and The Mackenzie’s Mission Study Teamadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(11), 1781; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111781 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 7606
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) provides people with information about their chance of having children with autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, enabling informed reproductive decision-making. RGCS is recommended to be offered to all couples during preconception or in early pregnancy. However, cost [...] Read more.
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) provides people with information about their chance of having children with autosomal recessive or X-linked genetic conditions, enabling informed reproductive decision-making. RGCS is recommended to be offered to all couples during preconception or in early pregnancy. However, cost and a lack of awareness may prevent access. To address this, the Australian Government funded Mackenzie’s Mission—the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project. Mackenzie’s Mission aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of an easily accessible RGCS program, provided free of charge to the participant. In study Phase 1, implementation needs were mapped, and key study elements were developed. In Phase 2, RGCS is being offered by healthcare providers educated by the study team. Reproductive couples who provide consent are screened for over 1200 genes associated with >750 serious, childhood-onset genetic conditions. Those with an increased chance result are provided comprehensive genetic counseling support. Reproductive couples, recruiting healthcare providers, and study team members are also invited to complete surveys and/or interviews. In Phase 3, a mixed-methods analysis will be undertaken to assess the program outcomes, psychosocial implications and implementation considerations alongside an ongoing bioethical analysis and a health economic evaluation. Findings will inform the implementation of an ethically robust RGCS program. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing in Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1145 KiB  
Review
Genetic Counselling Needs for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Scoping Review
by Samantha Edwards and Nigel Laing
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(10), 1699; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101699 - 11 Oct 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3108
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening provides individuals and couples with information regarding their risk of having a child affected by an autosomal recessive or X-linked recessive genetic condition. This information allows them the opportunity to make reproductive decisions in line with their own beliefs [...] Read more.
Reproductive genetic carrier screening provides individuals and couples with information regarding their risk of having a child affected by an autosomal recessive or X-linked recessive genetic condition. This information allows them the opportunity to make reproductive decisions in line with their own beliefs and values. Traditionally, carrier screening has been accessed by family members of affected individuals. In recent years, improvements to accessibility and updates to recommendations suggest that all women planning or in early pregnancy should be offered reproductive genetic carrier screening. As uptake moves towards the population scale, how can the genetic counselling needs of such large-scale screening be met? A scoping review of the literature was performed to ascertain what the genetic counselling needs of reproductive genetic carrier screening are, and what future research is needed. Four broad themes were identified in the existing literature: (1) The offer—when and in what context to offer screening; (2) Information—the importance of and what to include in education, and pre- and post-test counselling; (3) Who and how—who the genetic counselling is performed by and how; (4) Personalization—how do we find the balance between standardized and individualized approaches? Based on the existing literature, we present a set of recommendations for consideration in implementing population-scale reproductive genetic carrier screening as well as suggested areas for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing in Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 873 KiB  
Article
Outcomes of Importance to Patients in Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Core Outcome Set
by Ebony Richardson, Alison McEwen, Toby Newton-John, Ashley Crook and Chris Jacobs
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(8), 1310; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081310 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2946
Abstract
There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed across studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Only a small number of studies have measured patient-reported outcomes or included patients in the selection of outcomes that are meaningful to them. This study was a [...] Read more.
There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed across studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Only a small number of studies have measured patient-reported outcomes or included patients in the selection of outcomes that are meaningful to them. This study was a cross-sectional, qualitative study of 15 patient participants conducted to inform a core outcome set. A core outcome set is an approach to facilitate standardisation in outcome reporting, allowing direct comparison of outcomes across studies to enhance understanding of impacts and potential harms. The aim of this study was to incorporate the patient perspective in the development of a core outcome set by eliciting a detailed understanding of outcomes of importance to patients. Data were collected via online, semi-structured interviews using a novel method informed by co-design and the nominal group technique. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Outcomes elicited from patient stakeholder interviews highlighted several under-explored areas for future research. This includes the role of grief and loss in increased risk couples, the role of empowerment in conceptualising the utility of RGCS, the impact of societal context and barriers that contribute to negative experiences, and the role of genetic counselling in ensuring that information needs are met and informed choice facilitated as RGCS becomes increasingly routine. Future research should focus on incorporating outcomes that accurately reflect patient needs and experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing in Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 1033 KiB  
Review
Current Updates on Expanded Carrier Screening: New Insights in the Omics Era
by Iolanda Veneruso, Chiara Di Resta, Rossella Tomaiuolo and Valeria D’Argenio
Medicina 2022, 58(3), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030455 - 21 Mar 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4737
Abstract
Genetic carrier screening has been successfully used over the last decades to identify individuals at risk of transmitting specific DNA variants to their newborns, thus having an affected child. Traditional testing has been offered based on familial and/or ethnic backgrounds. The development of [...] Read more.
Genetic carrier screening has been successfully used over the last decades to identify individuals at risk of transmitting specific DNA variants to their newborns, thus having an affected child. Traditional testing has been offered based on familial and/or ethnic backgrounds. The development of high-throughput technologies, such as next-generations sequencing, able to allow the study of large genomic regions in a time and cost-affordable way, has moved carrier screening toward a more comprehensive and extensive approach, i.e., expanded carrier screening (ECS). ECS simultaneously analyses several disease-related genes and better estimates individuals’ carrier status. Indeed, it is not influenced by ethnicity and is not limited to a subset of mutations that may arise from poor information in some populations. Moreover, if couples carry out ECS before conceiving a baby, it allows them to obtain a complete estimation of their genetic risk and the possibility to make an informed decision regarding their reproductive life. Despite these advantages, some weakness still exists regarding, for example, the number of genes and the kind of diseases to be analyzed and the interpretation and communication of the obtained results. Once these points are fixed, it is expectable that ECS will become an ever more frequent practice in clinical settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1958 KiB  
Concept Paper
Addressing Reproductive Healthcare Disparities through Equitable Carrier Screening: Medical Racism and Genetic Discrimination in United States’ History Highlights the Needs for Change in Obstetrical Genetics Care
by Aishwarya Arjunan, Deanna R. Darnes, Katelynn G. Sagaser and Ashley B. Svenson
Societies 2022, 12(2), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020033 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 10354
Abstract
Carrier screening, a nearly half-century old practice, aims to provide individuals and couples with information about their risk of having children with serious genetic conditions. Traditionally, the conditions for which individuals were offered screening depended on their self-reported race or ethnicity and which [...] Read more.
Carrier screening, a nearly half-century old practice, aims to provide individuals and couples with information about their risk of having children with serious genetic conditions. Traditionally, the conditions for which individuals were offered screening depended on their self-reported race or ethnicity and which conditions were seen commonly in that population. This process has led to disparities and inequities in care as the multi-racial population in the U.S. has grown exponentially, yet databases used to determine clinical practice guidelines are made up of primarily White cohorts. Technological advancements now allow for pan-ethnic expanded carrier screening (ECS), which screens for many conditions regardless of self-reported race or ethnicity. ECS presents a unique opportunity to promote equitable genetic testing practices in reproductive medicine. However, this goal can only be achieved if we acknowledge and appreciate the innumerable inequities evidenced in reproductive medicine and other socio-legal practices in the United States, and if we intentionally work in concert with healthcare providers, policy makers, advocates, and community health champions to reduce current and future reproductive health disparities. Herein, we provide a brief review of the way that US medical racism and genetic discrimination has shaped the current landscape of carrier screening. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 879 KiB  
Article
Reverse Genetic Screen for Deleterious Recessive Variants in the Local Simmental Cattle Population of Switzerland
by Irene M. Häfliger, Franz R. Seefried and Cord Drögemüller
Animals 2021, 11(12), 3535; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123535 - 12 Dec 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3931
Abstract
We herein report the result of a large-scale reverse genetic screen in the Swiss Simmental population, a local dual-purpose cattle breed. We aimed to detect possible recessively inherited variants affecting protein-coding genes, as such deleterious variants can impair fertility and rearing success significantly. [...] Read more.
We herein report the result of a large-scale reverse genetic screen in the Swiss Simmental population, a local dual-purpose cattle breed. We aimed to detect possible recessively inherited variants affecting protein-coding genes, as such deleterious variants can impair fertility and rearing success significantly. We used 115,000 phased SNP data of almost 10 thousand cattle with pedigree data. This revealed evidence for 11 genomic regions of 1.17 Mb on average, with haplotypes (SH1 to SH11) showing a significant depletion in homozygosity and an allele frequency between 3.2 and 10.6%. For the proposed haplotypes, it was unfortunately not possible to evaluate associations with fertility traits as no corresponding data were available. For each haplotype region, possible candidate genes were listed based on their known function in development and disease. Subsequent mining of single-nucleotide variants and short indels in the genomes of 23 sequenced haplotype carriers allowed us to identify three perfectly linked candidate causative protein-changing variants: a SH5-related DIS3:p.Ile678fs loss-of-function variant, a SH8-related CYP2B6:p.Ile313Asn missense variant, and a SH9-related NUBPL:p.Ser143Tyr missense variant. None of these variants occurred in homozygous state in any of more than 5200 sequenced cattle of various breeds. Selection against these alleles in order to reduce reproductive failure and animal loss is recommended. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 750 KiB  
Article
Clinical Implementation of Expanded Carrier Screening in Pregnant Women at Early Gestational Weeks: A Chinese Cohort Study
by Mengmeng Shi, Angeline Linna Liauw, Steve Tong, Yu Zheng, Tak Yeung Leung, Shuk Ching Chong, Ye Cao, Tze Kin Lau, Kwong Wai Choy and Jacqueline P. W. Chung
Genes 2021, 12(4), 496; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040496 - 29 Mar 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3626
Abstract
Demands for expanded carrier screening (ECS) are growing and ECS is becoming an important part of obstetrics practice and reproductive planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a small-size ECS panel in clinical implementation and investigate Chinese couples’ [...] Read more.
Demands for expanded carrier screening (ECS) are growing and ECS is becoming an important part of obstetrics practice and reproductive planning. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a small-size ECS panel in clinical implementation and investigate Chinese couples’ attitudes towards ECS. An ECS panel containing 11 recessive conditions was offered to Chinese pregnant women below 16 gestational weeks. Sequential testing of their partners was recommended for women with a positive carrier status. The reproductive decision and pregnancy outcome were surveyed for at-risk couples. A total of 1321 women performed ECS successfully and the overall carrier rate was 19.23%. The estimated at-risk couple rate was 0.83%. Sequential testing was performed in less than half of male partners. Eight at-risk couples were identified and four of them performed prenatal diagnosis. Our study demonstrated that a small-size ECS panel could yield comparable clinical value to a larger-size panel when the carrier rate of the individual condition is equal or greater than 1%. In addition, more than half of male partners whose wives were carriers declined any types of sequential testing possibly due to a lack of awareness and knowledge of genetic disorders. Genetic education is warranted for the better implementation of ECS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1447 KiB  
Review
The Reproductive Journey in the Genomic Era: From Preconception to Childhood
by Sandra Garcia-Herrero, Blanca Simon and Javier Garcia-Planells
Genes 2020, 11(12), 1521; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11121521 - 19 Dec 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5138
Abstract
It is estimated that around 10–15% of the population have problems achieving a pregnancy. Assisted reproduction techniques implemented and enforced by personalized genomic medicine have paved the way for millions of infertile patients to become parents. Nevertheless, having a baby is just the [...] Read more.
It is estimated that around 10–15% of the population have problems achieving a pregnancy. Assisted reproduction techniques implemented and enforced by personalized genomic medicine have paved the way for millions of infertile patients to become parents. Nevertheless, having a baby is just the first challenge to overcome in the reproductive journey, the most important is to obtain a healthy baby free of any genetic condition that can be prevented. Prevention of congenital anomalies throughout the lifespan of the patient must be a global health priority. Congenital disorders can be defined as structural or functional anomalies that occur during intrauterine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth, or sometimes may only be detected later during childhood. It is considered a frequent group of disorders, affecting 3–6% of the population, and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Congenital anomalies can represent up to 30–50% of infant mortality in developed countries. Genetics plays a substantial role in the pathogenesis of congenital anomalies. This becomes especially important in some ethnic communities or populations where the incidence and levels of consanguinity are higher. The impact of genetic disorders during childhood is high, representing 20–30% of all infant deaths and 11.1% of pediatric hospital admissions. With these data, obtaining a precise genetic diagnosis is one of the main aspects of a preventive medicine approach in developed countries. The field of reproductive health has changed dramatically from traditional non-molecular visual microscope-based techniques (i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or G-banding karyotype), to the latest molecular high-throughput techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Genome-wide technologies are applied along the different stages of the reproductive health lifecycle from preconception carrier screening and pre-implantation genetic testing, to prenatal and postnatal testing. The aim of this paper is to assess the new horizon opened by technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), in new strategies, as a genomic precision diagnostic tool to understand the mechanisms underlying genetic conditions during the “reproductive journey”. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue EmbryoGenetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop