Search Results (41)

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy among men worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In 2022, over 1.4 million new cases were reported globally, with a prevalence exceeding 5 million. Despite its widespread occurrence, the incidence and mortality of PCa show substantial geographic variation, influenced by factors such as genetic predisposition, healthcare access, lifestyle, and the adoption of screening programs. Regions with high PCa incidence, such as Northern America and Oceania, often have lower mortality rates due to early detection and advanced healthcare infrastructure. Conversely, areas with limited access to medical resources, such as parts of Africa and Latin America, experience higher mortality rates. Methods: This review explores non-modifiable risk factors such as age, family history, and race, emphasizing their role in PCa development and progression. Results: Modifiable factors, including diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking, are also addressed, with evidence suggesting their potential in mitigating risk. Emerging data on medications such as 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and statins, as well as dietary supplements such as vitamins D, indicate their potential for chemoprevention, though further research is needed to solidify these findings. Healthcare disparities, especially in low- and middle-income regions, highlight the need for equitable access to diagnostic tools and treatment options. The review underscores the significance of tailored screening approaches, particularly in high-risk populations, to optimize outcomes while minimizing overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Conclusions: The review concludes with recommendations for future research, including the need for standardized screening protocols and the exploration of novel biomarkers for early detection. By synthesizing epidemiological data and current evidence, this review aims to enhance understanding of PCa risk factors, geographic disparities, and preventive strategies, ultimately contributing to improved global PCa management and outcomes. Full article

Prostate cancer remains a major global health challenge, ranking as the second most common malignancy in men worldwide. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have transformed its management, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review highlights recent breakthroughs in imaging, including multiparametric MRI and PSMA-PET, which have improved cancer detection and staging. Biomarker-based diagnostics, such as PHI and 4K Score, offer precise risk stratification, reducing unnecessary biopsies. Innovations in treatment, including robotic-assisted surgery, novel hormone therapies, immunotherapy, and PARP inhibitors, are redefining care for localized and advanced prostate cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are emerging as powerful tools to optimize diagnostics, risk prediction, and treatment personalization. Additionally, advances in radiation therapy, such as IMRT and SBRT, provide targeted and effective options for high-risk patients. While these innovations have significantly improved survival and minimized overtreatment, challenges remain in optimizing therapy sequencing and addressing disparities in care. The integration of AI, theranostics, and gene-editing technologies holds immense promise for the future of prostate cancer management. Full article

Advances in screening, early detection, and therapeutic innovations have significantly improved survival rates, transforming prostate cancer into a chronic condition for many men. However, these strides have also revealed persistent challenges in survivorship, including treatment-related side effects, disparities in care, and inequities in outcomes. This review explores the complex landscape of prostate cancer survivorship, with a focus on demographic disparities, barriers to care, symptom burden, and treatment patterns. Our findings highlight how factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance type heavily influence patient outcomes. For instance, Black and Latiné patients often face delays in treatment initiation and are less likely to receive definitive therapies than White patients, leading to poorer survival outcomes. Furthermore, those with Medicaid or no insurance are more likely to receive systemic therapy only or no treatment at all, exacerbating existing inequities. Addressing gaps in diagnosis, treatment access, and survivorship care is essential to developing targeted interventions and policies that promote equitable, patient-centered care for prostate cancer survivors. Full article

Background: Prostate cancer is recognised as the second most common diagnosed cancer in men and remains a significant global public health concern. In Ireland, the incidence of prostate cancer continues to rise, with approximately 1 in 6 men being diagnosed in their lifetime. Men’s experiences with prostate cancer are complex, necessitating further research into the factors influencing diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, this study aims to explore men’s experiences with prostate cancer, emphasising the interplay between screening, diagnosis, and the lived experiences of those affected. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among men with prostate cancer in Ireland. Using a purposive sampling (n = 11) were interviewed with data saturation guiding sample size determination. A semi-structured interview guide was used for data collection either face-to-face or via Microsoft Teams and phone calls. Data were analysed using Braune and Clarke’s thematic analysis approach after transcription, with NVivo 12.0 software supporting analysis. Results: Thematic analysis identified five themes: systemic obstacle in timely cancer detection, the role of efficient system in cancer care, emotional resilience in cancer recovery, redefining normalcy post treatment and harnessing specialised support network in coping strategies. These themes were examined through the lens of the Biopsychosocial Model to understand their interconnected nature and impact on patient experiences. Conclusions: This study highlights the complex factors affecting prostate cancer patients’ experiences, emphasizing the need for a patient-centred approach, addressing systemic disparities, and promoting multidisciplinary care. It suggests implementing evidence-based survivorship care frameworks to improve quality of life for survivors, with future research exploring long-term effects of integrated care models. Full article

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with diagnostic challenges magnified in underrepresented regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study introduces a novel application of ConvNeXt, an advanced convolutional neural network architecture, for multi-class classification of prostate histopathological images into normal, benign, and malignant categories. The dataset, sourced from a tertiary healthcare institution in Nigeria, represents a typically underserved African population, addressing critical disparities in global diagnostic research. We also used the ProstateX dataset (2017) from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) to validate our result. A comprehensive pipeline was developed, leveraging advanced data augmentation, Grad-CAM for interpretability, and an ablation study to enhance model optimization and robustness. The ConvNeXt model achieved an accuracy of 98%, surpassing the performance of traditional CNNs (ResNet50, 93%; EfficientNet, 94%; DenseNet, 92%) and transformer-based models (ViT, 88%; CaiT, 86%; Swin Transformer, 95%; RegNet, 94%). Also, using the ProstateX dataset, the ConvNeXt model recorded 87.2%, 85.7%, 86.4%, and 0.92 as accuracy, recall, F1 score, and AUC, respectively, as validation results. Its hybrid architecture combines the strengths of CNNs and transformers, enabling superior feature extraction. Grad-CAM visualizations further enhance explainability, bridging the gap between computational predictions and clinical trust. Ablation studies demonstrated the contributions of data augmentation, optimizer selection, and learning rate tuning to model performance, highlighting its robustness and adaptability for deployment in low-resource settings. This study advances equitable health care by addressing the lack of regional representation in diagnostic datasets and employing a clinically aligned three-class classification approach. Combining high performance, interpretability, and scalability, this work establishes a foundation for future research on diverse and underrepresented populations, fostering global inclusivity in cancer diagnostics. Full article

Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs), formed during the cooking of meat, are potential human carcinogens, underscoring the need for long-lived biomarkers to assess exposure and cancer risk. Frequent consumption of well-done meats containing 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), a prevalent HAA that is a prostatic carcinogen in rodents and DNA-damaging agent in human prostate cells, has been linked to aggressive prostate cancer (PC) pathology. African American (AA) men face nearly twice the risk for developing and dying from PC compared to White men. We previously demonstrated that scalp hair is a reliable biospecimen for measuring PhIP intake using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This study aimed to determine whether PhIP dietary intake is higher in AA men, potentially contributing to this health disparity. Healthy AA men were found to have a significantly higher mean hair PhIP level (2.12-fold) than White men on free-choice diets. However, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for melanin content. Further research is needed to understand how hair pigmentation, follicular density, and other morphological features of hair influence PhIP accumulation. These insights can improve the accuracy of using hair PhIP levels as a biomarker for exposure and its potential associations with cancer risk. Full article

Our aim was to describe the incidence and mortality of genitourinary (GU) cancers in rural and urban Pennsylvania counties. We calculated age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of GU (prostate, bladder, and kidney) cancers from 1990 to 2019 in the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. We defined rurality using the Center for Rural Pennsylvania’s population density-based definition. We modeled average annual percent changes (AAPC) in age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates using joinpoint regression. Overall GU cancer incidence decreased in rural and urban counties (AAPC −7.5%, p = 0.04 and AAPC −6.6%, p = 0.02, respectively). Prostate cancer incidence decreased in rural and urban counties by −10.5% (p = 0.02) and −9.1% (p = 0.01), respectively. Kidney cancer incidence increased in both rural and urban counties, respectively (AAPC = +11.2, p = 0.002 and +9.3%, p = 0.01). GU cancer mortality decreased in rural and urban counties (AAPC = −11.6, p = 0.047 and AAPC −12.2, p = 0.01, respectively). Prostate cancer mortality decreased at similar rates in rural and urban counties (AAPC −15.5, p = 0.03 and −15.4, p = 0.02, respectively). Kidney cancer mortality decreased in urban (AAPC −6.9% p = 0.03) but remained stable in rural counties. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality were unchanged in both types of counties. Over three decades, GU cancer incidence and mortality decreased across Pennsylvania counties. Full article

Background: Technical efficiency evaluates a hospital’s economic performance and plays an important role in variations in quality of care and outcomes. The study objective was to examine the association between hospital efficiency and quality of care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer and to assess if race moderates this association. Design: Retrospective study using Surveillance, Epidemiological, and End Results—Medicare (SEER-Medicare) data from 1998 to 2016 for prostate cancer patients aged ≥ 66. We computed hospital technical efficiency using a data envelopment analysis. Outcomes were emergency room visits, hospitalizations, cost, and mortality (all-cause and prostate cancer-specific). We used competing risk regression for survival, log-link GLM models for cost, and Poisson models for count data. The propensity score approach was used to minimize selection bias. Results: The cohort consisted of 323,325 patients. Compared to higher efficiency hospitals (upper quartile), low hospital efficiency (i.e., lower quartile) was associated with a higher hazard of long-term mortality (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.08) and long-term prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.11, 1.17). Compared to higher efficiency levels, lower levels were associated with impaired emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and costs. A one unit increase in the efficiency score was associated with greater benefits for cost and mortality for African American and white patients. The benefit was larger for African American patients compared to white patients. Conclusions: Increasing hospital efficiency may help improve outcomes among Medicare prostate cancer patients. Policies to redirect patients to hospitals with higher efficiency can enhance the quality of care and outcomes. Full article

Our study sought to review and summarize the reported health disparities and inequities in the utilization of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer. We queried the PubMed search engine through 12/2023 for original publications examining disparate utilization of PBT for prostate cancer. The query terms included the following: prostate cancer AND proton AND (disparities OR IMRT OR race OR insurance OR socioeconomic OR inequities)”. Studies were included if they involved United States patients, examined PBT in prostate cancer, and addressed health inequities. From this query, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 13 population-based analyses, 5 single-institutional analyses, 3 cost/modeling investigations, and 1 survey-based study. The analyses revealed that in addition to age-related and insurance-related disparities, race and socioeconomic status played significant roles in the receipt of PBT. The likelihood of receiving PBT was lower for non-White patients in population-based and single-institution analyses. Socioeconomic metrics, such as higher median income and higher education level, portended an increased likelihood of receiving PBT. Conclusively, substantial age-based, racial, socioeconomic/insurance-related, and facility-associated disparities and inequities existed for PBT utilization in prostate cancer. The identification of these disparities provides a framework to better address these as the utility of PBT continues to expand across the US and globally. Full article

Health disparities in urologic oncology, particularly in prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers, significantly impact patient outcomes across different demographic groups. This narrative review aims to investigate the extent and drivers of these disparities, focusing on the influence of race, socioeconomic status, and geographic location on diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature and analyzed data from national cancer databases to identify patterns of inequity. Our findings reveal that minority populations, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and those residing in underserved areas are less likely to receive timely and guideline-based care, leading to worse outcomes. This review underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions, including policy reforms, health system restructuring, enhanced community outreach, and increased funding for disparity-focused research, to ensure equitable access to high-quality oncologic care. Addressing these disparities is crucial for improving cancer outcomes and achieving health equity in urologic oncology. Full article

Despite the considerable global burden of urologic malignancies, Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often encounter significant challenges in caring for patients with urologic malignancies. Several interrelated factors impact cancer care in LMICs, which face significant challenges that hinder effective diagnosis, treatment, and management of disease. Socioeconomic and healthcare infrastructure limitations are fundamental issues leading to the disparity observed in cancer care across the globe. This review aims to evaluate the challenges and disparities in access to comprehensive urologic care in LMICs, emphasizing the impact of such global disparities on incidence rates, timely diagnoses, and access to comprehensive care as it relates to prostate, kidney, and bladder cancers. Full article

All 189 World Bank member countries are classified by their capita gross national income into one of four income groups. In this review, we aim to explore the economic burden and management of urologic oncology conditions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), emphasizing disparities and challenges in treatment access. The current World Bank classification system highlights economic stratification, showing significant health outcome disparities, particularly in urologic oncology conditions including kidney, bladder, and prostate cancer. First, this review focuses on the management of advanced prostate cancer in Asian LMICs, revealing higher mortality-to-incidence ratios and a greater prevalence of metastatic disease compared to high-income countries (HICs). The prohibitive costs of novel hormonal therapies (NHTs) like abiraterone and enzalutamide limit their use and exacerbate outcome disparities. Second, we review Wilms tumor treatment with chemotherapy in African countries, noting significant price variations for adapted and non-adapted regimens across different economic settings. The cost of chemotherapy agents, particularly dactinomycin, acts as a primary driver of treatment expenses, underscoring the economic challenges in providing high-quality care. Lastly, bladder cancer treatment costs in Brazil and Middle Eastern countries are examined, highlighting how detrimental the economic burden of intravesical therapies, like mitomycin C and Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG), is on treatment accessibility. Overall, this literature review emphasizes the financial strain on healthcare systems and patients, particularly in regions facing economic instability and drug shortages, and underscores the need for international cooperation and effective resource allocation to address the economic barriers to urologic care in LMICs, aiming to improve health outcomes and ensure equitable access to advanced treatments. Full article

Background: The overall survival rates among cancer patients have been improving. However, the increase in survival is not uniform across socioeconomic status. Thus, we investigated income disparities in the 5-year survival rate (5YSR) in cancer patients and the temporal trends. Methods: This study used a national cancer cohort from 2002 to 2018 that was established by linking the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) claim database to calculate the cancer survival rate by income level in the Republic of Korea. Survival data were available from 2002 onward, and the analysis was based on the actuarial method. We compared the survival of the earliest available 5-year period of 2002–2006 and the latest available 5-year period of 2014–2018, observing until 31 December 2021. Income level was classified into six categories: Medical Aid beneficiaries and five NHIS subtypes according to insurance premium. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality were used to measure absolute and relative differences in 5YSR by income, respectively. Results: The 5YSR between the 2002–2006 and 2014–2018 periods for all cancers improved. A significant improvement in 5-year survival rates (5YSR) over the study period was observed in lung, liver, and stomach cancer. The SII of survival rates for lung (17.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0–28.1), liver (15.1, 95% CI 10.9–19.2), stomach (13.9, 95% CI 3.2–24.7), colorectal (11.4, 95% CI 0.9–22.0), and prostate (10.7, 95% CI 2.5–18.8) cancer was significantly higher, implying higher survival rates as income levels increased. The SII for lung, liver, and stomach cancer increased, while that of thyroid, breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer decreased over the study period. Conclusions: Although substantial improvement in the 5YSR was observed across cancer types and income levels from 2002 to 2018, this increase was not uniformly distributed across income levels. Our study revealed persistent income disparities in the survival of cancer patients, particularly for lung and liver cancer. Full article

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) participate in almost all disorders, including cancer. Many factors, including aging, a high-fat diet, a stressful lifestyle, smoking, infection, genetic mutations, etc., lead to elevated levels of ROS. Prostate cancer, the most prevalent type of cancer in senior American men and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in American men, results from chronic oxidative stress. The doubled incident rate as well as the doubled mortality numbers of prostate cancer have persisted in African Americans in comparison with Caucasian Americans and other racial groups, indicating a prostate cancer disparity in African American men. In this review, we mainly focus on the latest findings on ROS in prostate cancer development and progression within the last five years to update our understanding in this area, as several comprehensive literature reviews addressing oxidative stress and/or inflammation in prostate cancer before 2020 are available. In addition to other known factors such as socioeconomic disadvantage, cultural mistrust of the health care system, etc. that are long-existing in the African American group, we also summarize the latest evidence that demonstrated high systemic oxidative stress and inflammation in African Americans for their potential contribution to the racial prostate cancer disparity in this population. Full article

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a leading cause of mortality among American men, with metastatic and recurrent disease posing significant therapeutic challenges due to a limited comprehension of the underlying biological processes governing disease initiation, dormancy, and progression. The conventional use of PCa cell lines has proven inadequate in elucidating the intricate molecular mechanisms driving PCa carcinogenesis, hindering the development of effective treatments. To address this gap, patient-derived primary cell cultures have been developed and play a pivotal role in unraveling the pathophysiological intricacies unique to PCa in each individual, offering valuable insights for translational research. This review explores the applications of the conditional reprogramming (CR) cell culture approach, showcasing its capability to rapidly and effectively cultivate patient-derived normal and tumor cells. The CR strategy facilitates the acquisition of stem cell properties by primary cells, precisely recapitulating the human pathophysiology of PCa. This nuanced understanding enables the identification of novel therapeutics. Specifically, our discussion encompasses the utility of CR cells in elucidating PCa initiation and progression, unraveling the molecular pathogenesis of metastatic PCa, addressing health disparities, and advancing personalized medicine. Coupled with the tumor organoid approach and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), CR cells present a promising avenue for comprehending cancer biology, exploring new treatment modalities, and advancing precision medicine in the context of PCa. These approaches have been used for two NCI initiatives (PDMR: patient-derived model repositories; HCMI: human cancer models initiatives). Full article