Search Results (474)

Objectives: This study proposes an implementation-oriented design framework for multimodal conversational agents handling patient-generated health data and reports an exploratory experiment evaluating its instantiation in hypertension self-monitoring, focusing on user experience of conversational data-entry workflows. Methods: The framework operationalizes four complementary dimensions (social intelligence, communication style, anthropomorphic characteristics, and technological mapping) and was instantiated in two agents integrated into an eHealth platform. Each agent supports users by providing prompts, interpreting responses, checking data plausibility, and confirming submission. A three-arm, single-session feasibility experiment ($n=18$, $n=6$ per group) compared a conventional app interface with text-based and voice-based conversational agents. Evaluation triangulated three sources of evidence: open-ended qualitative responses analyzed through descriptive content analysis, session-level researcher observation notes, and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) reported descriptively with one-way ANOVA and ${\eta }^2$ effect sizes. Results: All three modalities were acceptable to participants and produced UEQ scores in the positive range. Hesitation was observed in 2 of 6 Control participants, 1 of 6 Text participants, and 3 of 6 Voice participants, with self-reports indicating that voice-related difficulties were modality-specific (diction, command phrasing) and resolved within the session. Qualitative themes of acceptability and innovation, perceived effort, and modality-specific facilitators emerged across the corpus. Between-group ANOVAs did not reach statistical significance ($p>0.05$), as expected for an underpowered design, yet ${\eta }^2$ values were medium for Attractiveness, Efficiency, Dependability, and Pragmatic Quality and large for Stimulation and Hedonic Quality, converging with the qualitative innovation and engagement signal in the conversational conditions. Conclusions: The framework and feasibility experiment provide preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence on the potential of multimodal conversational interfaces in healthcare. However, no clinical, behavioral, or longitudinal outcomes were assessed. The four design dimensions can be tentatively associated with themes recognizable in user discourse, and the observed effect-size pattern motivates adequately powered longitudinal studies that incorporate behavioral and clinical endpoints alongside user experience measures. Full article

This article develops a symbolic hermeneutic framework for interpreting contemporary socio-educational phenomena within the horizon of decolonial thought and Liberation Theology. It begins from the assumption that symbols are not merely decorative forms of representation but fundamental structures of meaning that shape both individual experience and collective life, especially through their educational effects. From this perspective, the article examines how the symbols circulating in social communication reveal the ideological underpinnings of imagination, authority, exclusion, and resistance. The essay then places this symbolic analysis in dialog with decolonial theory, arguing that the enduring epistemological legacy of colonialism continues to organize hegemonic forms of knowledge, subjectivity, and power. Particular attention is devoted to the concept of the frontier, first understood as a modern device of exclusion and then reinterpreted as a space of epistemic resistance, ethical encounter, and democratic confrontation among differences. The discussion further engages key authors of Liberation Theology and the philosophy of liberation—especially Gustavo Gutiérrez, Leonardo Boff, Enrique Dussel, and Paulo Freire—in order to show how religious discourse and pedagogical practice intersect in processes of emancipation. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, interpretative approach grounded in philosophical hermeneutics and critical conceptual analysis. It reconstructs and compares major theoretical positions rather than presenting empirical data. The article argues that the integration of symbolic hermeneutics, decolonial thought, and liberationist theology offers an original framework for rethinking education as a transformative practice grounded in ethical responsibility toward the Other. By bringing the concepts of frontier, sentipensamiento, communality, and pluriverse into a single analytical constellation, the paper contributes to current debates in religious studies, critical pedagogy, and epistemic justice. In the context of contemporary global crises—migration, ecological devastation, social fragmentation, and the weakening of democratic participation—it proposes a renewed role for religion as a critical and generative force capable of opening new educational spaces for dialogue, liberation, and the reconfiguration of knowledge. Full article

The article examines conservative rhetoric and discourse in Israel toward the LGBTQ+ community from a sociolinguistic perspective that conceptualizes language as an arena of socio-cultural struggle over identity, power, and normativity. Drawing on queer linguistics theory and identity politics, the study explores how language constructs reality through metaphors of illness, sin, and existential threat, as well as through theological framing and appeals to family and national values. These rhetorical strategies produce a social hierarchy in which heteronormativity is positioned as a “natural truth” while queer identities are labelled as deviant or threatening. From sociological perspective, the study reveals how conservative discourse establishes social boundaries and reinforces collective identity through the exclusion of the Other, thereby reproducing power relations and hierarchies. The article calls for the development of an alternative public discourse grounded in pluralism, inclusion, and the recognition of diverse identities as a means of strengthening democracy and social justice. While existing studies have examined conservative discourse toward LGBTQ+ communities primarily in Western contexts, this study contributes to the field by centering the Israeli case as a distinctive site of analysis, where conservative voices emerge from multiple and ideologically heterogeneous traditions: national-religious, ultra-Orthodox, and Muslim-Arab. By examining how rhetorically divergent speakers converge around shared mechanisms of exclusion, the study reveals that heteronormative discourse is not the product of a single ideological source, but a cross-sectoral phenomenon embedded in the specific political and cultural tensions of Israeli society. Full article

The rise in large language models (LLMs) has sparked renewed interest in how firms, particularly multinational aid organizations, can enhance learning related to meta-dynamic capabilities (DCs), such as agility, sensing, and adaptation, in response to disasters and humanitarian crises. A key strategic priority is developing meta-rules that combine general engagement frameworks with locally tailored action plans, grounded in cultural and institutional contexts. LLMs offer potential in supporting this need, but premature deployment risks harmful or misleading outcomes. This underscores the critical importance of collaboration between artificial and human intelligence (AI-HI). While AI brings computational power, it lacks the tacit knowledge—encompassing cultural, contextual, and intuitive understanding—that is essential in high-stakes, unpredictable environments. Our experimental study provides two core insights: (1) AI alone cannot effectively handle tasks requiring tacit knowledge, and (2) AI-HI collaboration thrives when human input guides AI using deep awareness of local social and political dynamics. We contribute to the discourse on dynamic capabilities in multinational contexts during catastrophic situations by offering practical strategies to support successful AI-HI partnerships and a framework for organizations aiming to enhance meta-DCs through responsible, human-centered use of disruptive technologies. Our findings clarify how the international dimensions of these capabilities influence their effectiveness across diverse cultural and institutional environments. Full article

Social justice has become a cornerstone of contemporary educational systems, serving as both an ethical principle and a criterion for evaluating equity in learning opportunities. In the field of Physical Education (PE), its bodily and relational nature makes social hierarchies regarding ability, gender, and body image highly visible. This study adopted a qualitative descriptive design to explore how pre-service PE teachers conceptualize social justice and how they envision its didactic implementation within the Spanish curricular context. The findings provide a critical roadmap for teacher education programs, suggesting that fostering social justice requires moving beyond theoretical discourse toward specific pedagogical tools that address power dynamics and inclusion within Physical Education contexts. Full article

Periods of major technological transformation have historically coincided with the emergence of political movements. The current Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution, alongside the expansion of platform-based media, has reshaped how political dissent is produced, circulated, and normalized. This study examines contemporary anti-monarchist discourse associated with the UK-based Republic movement, focusing on how opposition to constitutional monarchy is articulated on YouTube within an environment shaped by profit-driven goals. Using NVivo 14, this qualitative study analyzes 62 publicly available YouTube videos published over a twelve-month period from January 2025 to January 2026, employing a hybrid inductive–deductive thematic analysis supported by Large Language Models. Findings identify three interrelated discursive themes: monarchy framed as legalized theft and extraction of public wealth; monarchical authority depicted as undemocratic and constitutionally manipulative; and the reproduction of colonial, elite, and mythic power through mediated narratives of tradition and national identity. Rather than evaluating the factual accuracy of anti-monarchist claims, the analysis treats this content as a mediated cultural practice through which broader socio-economic anxieties—such as inequality, democratic distrust, and fears of technological displacement—are symbolically organized. Digital platforms, such as the Republic Campaign YouTube channel, thus enable political discourse to gain visibility and resonance. Full article

Despite the focus on social justice, social work education is still heavily rooted in hierarchy and harmful educational practices. This conceptual and practice-informed article aims to highlight the deconstruction of educational hierarchy within the classroom through a justice lens, with equitable intention, and storytelling as meaningful discourse in social work education. These authors intend to deconstruct power dynamics, dismantle harmful assumptions, and encourage the unlearning of systemic and oppressive methods with the integration of clinical social work experience, useful decolonized classroom practices, and narrative pedagogy. The practice of storytelling can be healing, aid in building community, and also offer a collective learning experience that is actively working in social work education. The unlearning of harmful grading practices, classroom power structures, and models that reinforce individualism are essential for propelling social work education toward a more collective, justice-oriented approach. This article draws on transformational pedagogy and clinical social work practice to explore the ways in which change can occur with intention, attunement, and humility on behalf of instructors and lends to the ongoing conversation around decolonizing social work education. The authors posit that transformative education lies in the space between social work education and clinical practice. The methodology for this article is a culmination of a narrative literature review and the authors’ collective clinical social work practice and pedagogical experience, and this article brings what already occurs in that space into the scholarly literature. Full article

Metaphilosophy is often understood as an inquiry into the nature, goals, and methods of philosophy and is sometimes construed as an epistemology of philosophy. Moral questions concerning philosophical practice, however, are no less important and constitute a distinctive field that may be called ‘moral philosophy of philosophy’ or ‘moral metaphilosophy’. This article maps the field by identifying, addressing, and classifying various forms of moral transgressions in, against, and through philosophy. Hermeneutical rational injustices include the devaluation, discrediting, misrepresentation, and non-objective critique within philosophical discourse. Violations within academic philosophical practice encompass such phenomena as intellectual theft; gatekeeping; academic cliques; scholarly neglect; discrimination and favoritism; prestige bias, excellence bias, and other forms of bias oriented toward perceived institutional, professional, evaluative, or symbolic “topness”; unfair peer review; problematic evaluation criteria and rankings; abuses of power; unjust distributions of resources; and the inversion of virtues into vices. External injustices and transgressions concern the public discrediting of philosophy, violence against philosophers, the problematic relation between philosophy and politics, and the impact of extra-academic vices on philosophy. Bringing these issues to light, thereby underscoring the importance of moral metaphilosophy, can help protect philosophers from various forms of harm inflicted by themselves, colleagues, institutions, and other actors across academic and non-academic contexts, thereby rendering philosophical practice fairer and more worthwhile. Full article

Women have been historically underrepresented in every step of scientific enquiry and, therefore, the knowledge of female bodies is lacking. Now the tide is turning to bring focus on the role of sex and gender in human health and disease. The increasing demands by publishers, funders, and policymakers to pay attention to both sex and gender are commendable. Nevertheless, the premise of the definitions of sex, framed as biological attributes of an individual, contrasting with gender, which is defined through the sociocultural roles, identities, and power structures, carries all pitfalls of the nature–nurture divide, undermining that they are deeply intertwined and interact continuously across the lifespan, shaping physiology and behavior. Current scientific studies rarely disentangle the two for etiological purposes, for their respective contributions to health outcomes. Despite this, there is a push to use both terms appropriately in research and society. This invariably results in the oversimplification of complex processes of sex/gender intertwining, leading to incomplete or misleading causal inferences. Here, I make a case for retiring the sex/gender etiological split in the scientific and public discourse and embracing sex/gender intertwining, rather than minimizing it. This will then enable researchers to focus on how they interact with other variables to produce phenotypes, bringing scientific clarity. Full article

Given the lack of research on the intersection of media and religion outside the U.S. and in South Korea, this study analyzed how two mainstream daily newspapers have depicted Christianity and compared their tones and frames toward this religion and megachurches in Korea. News stories on three major religions—Protestantism, Buddhism, and Catholicism—were identified and collected from the newspapers’ online archives. Overall, 302 out of 895 articles were focused on Christianity. Quantitative content analysis was utilized with a manual holistic approach. One of the major findings is that Chosun Ilbo, a conservative-leaning publication, described Protestantism in a more positive manner than Kyunghyang Shinmun, a liberal-leaning newspaper. Another finding is that there has been a shift in religion news coverage between 2011 and 2022 in terms of frames applied. Frames such as political power and corrupt were used more often in 2011, whereas the social work frame was employed more frequently in 2022, when covering Protestantism. The findings offer critical implications for journalists, religious communities, and the public by identifying journalistic practices that potentially fuel audience polarization. This exploratory study serves as a foundational step in advancing scholarly discourse on the media–religion interface in South Korea. Full article

The study examines how secondary school students interacted with an AI-powered educational chatbot, MyBotBuddy, while working on a programming task, and how observed dialogue structures were associated with differences in pre- to post-test performance. Fifty students first completed an unassisted pre-test, then attempted a chatbot-supported programming task, and finally completed an unassisted post-test. Based on score change, students were grouped into learning gain, no gain, and learning loss categories. Dialogue transcripts were analyzed using Epistemic Network Analysis to identify co-occurring discourse patterns, alongside descriptive sentiment analysis to characterize lexical tone. Students in the learning gain group showed more connected multi-turn patterns involving solution attempts, feedback uptake, knowledge-related contributions, and clarification following feedback. In contrast, the no gain and learning loss groups showed less iterative and less systematically connected interaction structures. Average sentiment polarity differed only slightly across groups and is interpreted cautiously because the dialogue was technical and programming focused. The findings are associational and exploratory rather than causal and suggest that learner engagement with a chatbot may be more informative than interaction frequency alone. We discuss implications for educational chatbot design, especially the potential value of multi-turn scaffolding and reflective prompting, while outlining the need for future validation, baseline-controlled analyses, and experimental work. Full article

This article offers a comprehensive theorization of stiob as a historically sedimented, culturally specific, yet increasingly globalized modality of ironic discourse whose logic of deadpan overidentification has migrated from late-Soviet conceptualist counterculture into twenty-first-century political communication. Revisiting the folkloric, carnivalesque, and double-voiced foundations of stiob, this study situates the phenomenon within the longue durée of Russian humor, holy foolishness (юрoдствo), and the grotesque tradition described by Dmitry Likhachev, Aleksandr Panchenko, Mikhail Bakhtin, and Sergei Averintsev. The argument proceeds to demonstrate how contemporary political actors—most prominently Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin—have appropriated stiob and its adjacent practices (holy foolishness, trolling, strategic sacrilege, and carnivalesque inversion) as powerful rhetorical instruments capable of destabilizing discursive norms, undermining institutional authority, and creating a semi-permanent state of “infernal laughter.” Drawing on examples from political speech, social media, public performance, and mediatized spectacle, the article contends that both Trump and Putin deploy a repertoire of ironic aggression, misdirection, double-voiced innuendo, and taboo-breaking parody that weaponizes cultural archetypes of the jester, trickster, and holy fool. This mode of communication, simultaneously theatrical and destructive, produces a new form of political carnivalesque in which hierarchical orders are inverted, outrage is instrumentalized, and the distinction between sincerity and mockery collapses. Ultimately, this article argues that stiob, trolling, and holy foolishness now constitute a transnational discursive formation reshaping public culture in the twenty-first century. Full article

Digitainability is increasingly invoked at the intersection of sustainability and digital transformation. In education, however, the two discourses are still often negotiated separately. This conceptual paper addresses that gap by focusing on educational debates across Germany, Austria and Switzerland (the DACH region) and by developing a conceptual–synthetic argument based on a purposive reconstruction of key reference texts. It argues that sustainability-related educational aims—particularly SDG target 4.7—remain conceptually under-specified when digitality is primarily understood as a toolkit rather than a socio-technical condition. It also contends that the digital transformation in education can only be assessed and shaped responsibly when sustainability and justice are treated as integral to the analysis and design of educational processes. Against this backdrop, the paper develops the Digitainability Framework as a heuristic for reflection, analysis, and design. The framework proposes a double perspective: sustainable digitality (the design of ‘onlife’ environments) and sustainability under conditions of digitality (the negotiation of sustainability-related conflicts in media-shaped, increasingly platformised publics). Across both perspectives, the framework makes explicit four intersecting framings—cultural, power-related, discursive, and agent-related—while keeping sustainability in view across its social, ecological, and economic dimensions. A brief example illustrates the framework’s potential. Full article

The 2021–2024 global energy crisis intensified the energy transition, with mainstream media coverage playing a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions. Guided by Burke’s and Lippmann’s theories, and supported by corpus-based critical and rhetorical discourse analyses, this interdisciplinary study aimed to analyze the role of lexical patterns and rhetorical strategies in framing the transition within a corpus of 1341 news articles retrieved from the websites of five English-language mainstream media outlets. Corpus-based analysis identified generic frames, including economic consequences, responsibility, conflict, technological, emotion, and moral duty frames. Rhetorical discourse analysis revealed specific frames, including economic opportunities, technological progress and challenges, energy security and independence, global leadership, energy partnerships, partisan divide, global disparities, corporate greenwashing, necessity, hope, and uncertainty frames, that indicated an ambivalence in the framing of the transition, thereby contributing to the polarization and manipulation of public opinion. The findings indicated a discrepancy: while British, American, and Brazilian media focused more on political divides, Indian and Chinese media emphasized energy partnerships and patriotism. Appeals to experts were less frequent, whereas appeals to emotions were often employed to shape public perceptions. The findings illustrate how lexical patterns and rhetorical strategies function as powerful framing tools within journalism, applied linguistics, and media rhetoric. Full article

This study investigates the communicative power of editorial cartoons in Ghana’s public discourse, focusing on how they inform, critique, and influence sociopolitical narratives. Drawing on a dataset of cartoons by Tilapia—one of the country’s leading cartoonists—published between May 2024 and May 2025, the paper explores how cartoons address themes such as economic hardship, youth addiction, cultural values, environmental degradation, and political hypocrisy. The central question guiding this study is as follows: How do Tilapia’s editorial cartoons visually construct and critique key national issues—such as economic hardship, environmental degradation, youth addiction, and political hypocrisy—in Ghanaian public discourse? Guided by an integrated theoretical framework from semiotics, visual rhetoric, and critical metaphor theory, the analysis reveals how cartoons use humour, caricature, exaggeration, and symbolic imagery to simplify complex realities and foster civic reflection. The study highlights how cartoons serve not only to entertain but also to hold power to account, amplify public concerns, and promote sociopolitical engagement. Through detailed visual analysis of ten selected cartoons, the paper underscores their capacity to critique governance, expose contradictions, and reflect collective sentiment—especially during election cycles. Overall, the research affirms the evolving role of visual satire as a potent medium of resistance, cultural expression, and democratic participation in Ghana. By bridging visual culture and critical discourse, the paper contributes to broader understandings of the role of the media in shaping public perception and fostering informed citizenship. Full article