Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = percutaneous epidural neuroplasty

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 826 KB  
Review
Complications Following Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence and the Rationale for Post-Procedural 6 h Inpatient Monitoring Amid Limited Systematic Data
by Jae Hun Kim, Eun Jang Yoon, Sung Ho Jo, Sun Ok Kim, Dong Woo Lee and Hwan Hee Kim
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1397; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081397 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1584
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) and related adhesiolysis procedures are widely used for managing chronic spinal pain. Although generally safe, complications—ranging from minor to life-threatening—have been reported. This review aimed to estimate the incidence and characteristics of complications following PEN and to [...] Read more.
Background: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) and related adhesiolysis procedures are widely used for managing chronic spinal pain. Although generally safe, complications—ranging from minor to life-threatening—have been reported. This review aimed to estimate the incidence and characteristics of complications following PEN and to evaluate the medical rationale for post-procedural inpatient monitoring. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2000 to April 2025 reporting complications associated with PEN. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on five eligible cohort studies to estimate the pooled complication rate and evaluated heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Five cohort studies (n = 1740) were included in the meta-analysis, with a pooled complication rate of 9.0% (95% CI: 4.8–13.1%, I2 = 97.5%). A total of 133 complications were identified from cohort studies and case reports. Mechanical and neurological complications were most common. Serious complications, including hematoma, meningitis, and cardiopulmonary arrest, were concentrated within the first 6 h post-procedure. Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights a quantifiable risk of complications associated with PEN. Our findings support structured inpatient monitoring during the immediate post-procedural period to enhance safety and outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 761 KB  
Article
Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty for Symptomatic Lumbar Juxtafacet Cysts
by Juneyoung Heo, Hyung-Ki Park, Ji-Hoon Baek, Hye-Sun Ahn and Su-Chan Lee
Medicina 2024, 60(7), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071042 - 25 Jun 2024
Viewed by 2235
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The term “Juxtafacet cyst” refers to both synovial cysts and ganglion pseudocysts associated with the lumbar facet joint. As conservative treatment for the juxtafacet cyst has a minimal effect, complete excision through surgery is considered the first choice of treatment. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The term “Juxtafacet cyst” refers to both synovial cysts and ganglion pseudocysts associated with the lumbar facet joint. As conservative treatment for the juxtafacet cyst has a minimal effect, complete excision through surgery is considered the first choice of treatment. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty for symptomatic lumbar juxtafacet cysts. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 34 patients with symptomatic juxtafacet cysts who visited a single institute from January 2010 to September 2023. Patients who received conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks but experienced no or insufficient effects were eligible for this study. After neuroplasty, a medical history check and neurological examination were performed during follow-up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and once a year thereafter. Results: The pain improved for all patients to a VAS score of 3 or less immediately after neuroplasty; however, four of those patients (11%) had pain that worsened eventually to the same level as before the procedure and required surgery. The results showed that, regardless of cyst size, in cases with severe stenosis of the spinal canal, the outcome of neuroplasty was poor and often eventually required surgery. The cyst size was not associated with the procedure results. In addition, if the cyst was present at the L4–L5 level, or if diabetes mellitus was present, the likelihood of future surgery was significant (p-value = 0.003). Conclusions: Percutaneous neuroplasty showed a better success rate than other non-surgical treatments. In addition, severe spinal stenosis (Schizas grade C or higher), L4–L5 level, or diabetes mellitus produced a high possibility of surgery due to recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3288 KB  
Article
A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Lower Back Pain: Outcomes at Six-Month Follow Up
by Jong Bum Choi, Jae Chul Koh, Daehyun Jo, Jae Hyung Kim, Won Sok Chang, Kang Taek Lim, Hyung Gon Lee, Ho Sik Moon, Eunsoo Kim, Sun Yeul Lee, Kibeom Park, Yi Hwa Choi, Sang Jun Park, Jinyoung Oh, Sook Young Lee, Bumhee Park, Eun Kyung Jun, Yeong Seung Ko, Ji Su Kim, Eunji Ha, Tae Kwang Kim, Gyu Bin Choi, Ra Yoon Cho and Na Eun Kimadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Medicina 2024, 60(5), 839; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050839 - 20 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2202
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN) facilitates adhesiolysis through direct epiduroscopic visualization, offering more precise neural decompression than that exhibited by percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN). We aimed to compare the effects of EEN and PEN for 6 months after treatment with [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Endoscopic epidural neuroplasty (EEN) facilitates adhesiolysis through direct epiduroscopic visualization, offering more precise neural decompression than that exhibited by percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN). We aimed to compare the effects of EEN and PEN for 6 months after treatment with lower back and radicular pain in patients. Methods: This retrospective study compared the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores in patients with low back and radicular pain who underwent EEN or PEN with a steering catheter. The medical records of 107 patients were analyzed, with 73 and 34 undergoing EEN and PEN, respectively. Results: The VAS and ODI scores decreased at all time points after EEN and PEN. VAS and ODI scores decreased more in the EEN group than those in the PEN group at 1 day and 1- and 6-months post-procedure, indicating superior pain relief for both lower back and radicular pain through EEN. Conclusions: EEN is a superior treatment of pain control than PEN in lower back and radicular pain patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5221 KB  
Review
Spinal Injections: A Narrative Review from a Surgeon’s Perspective
by Dong Ah Shin, Yoo Jin Choo and Min Cheol Chang
Healthcare 2023, 11(16), 2355; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162355 - 21 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2726
Abstract
Spinal pain is one of most frequent complaints of the general population, which can cause decreased activities of daily living and absence from work. Among numerous therapeutic methods, spinal injection is one of the most effective treatments for spinal pain and is currently [...] Read more.
Spinal pain is one of most frequent complaints of the general population, which can cause decreased activities of daily living and absence from work. Among numerous therapeutic methods, spinal injection is one of the most effective treatments for spinal pain and is currently widely applied in the clinical field. In this review, spinal injection is discussed from a surgeon’s perspective. Recently, although the number of spinal surgeries has been increasing, questions are arising as to whether they are necessary. The failure rate after spinal surgery is high, and its long-term outcome was reported to be similar to spinal injection. Thus, spinal surgeries should be performed conservatively. Spinal injection is largely divided into diagnostic and therapeutic blocks. Using diagnostic blocks, such as the diagnostic selective nerve root block, disc stimulation test, and diagnostic medial branch block (MBB), the precise location causing the pain can be confirmed. For therapeutic blocks, transforaminal nerve root injection, therapeutic MBB, and percutaneous epidural neuroplasty are used. When unbearable spinal pain persists despite therapeutic spinal injections, spinal surgeries can be considered. Spinal injection is usefully used to identify the precise location prior to a patient undergoing injection treatment or surgery and can reduce pain and improve quality of life, and help to avoid spinal surgery. Pain physicians should treat patients with spinal pain by properly utilizing spinal injection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pain Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 613 KB  
Article
Impact of Sarcopenia on Percutaneous Epidural Balloon Neuroplasty in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis
by Yun-A Han, Hyun-Jung Kwon, Kunhee Lee, Min-Gi Son, Hotaek Kim, Seong-Soo Choi, Jin-Woo Shin and Doo-Hwan Kim
Medicina 2023, 59(5), 847; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050847 - 27 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2633
Abstract
Background and Objectives: With the aging population, the incidence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is increasing. Sarcopenia is an age-related muscular decrease. Although epidural balloon neuroplasty is effective in patients with LSS refractory to conventional treatments, its effect has not been [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: With the aging population, the incidence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is increasing. Sarcopenia is an age-related muscular decrease. Although epidural balloon neuroplasty is effective in patients with LSS refractory to conventional treatments, its effect has not been assessed in patients with sarcopenia. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of epidural balloon neuroplasty in patients with LSS and sarcopenia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the following details from the electronic medical records: patient characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, stenosis grading, pain duration, location, pain intensity, and medications. Back and leg pain intensity was evaluated before and after the procedure at one, three, and six months during the follow-up period. A generalized estimating equations model was used at six months follow-up. Patients were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups using the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the level of L3 on magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 477 patients were included (sarcopenia group: 314 patients, 65.8%; non-sarcopenia group: 163 patients, 34.2%). Age, sex, body mass index, and medication quantification scale III were statistically different between both groups. The generalized estimating equations analyses—with unadjusted and adjusted estimation—revealed a significantly reduced pain intensity after the procedure compared to the baseline in both groups. The difference in pain intensity between both groups was not statistically different. Conclusions: Percutaneous epidural balloon neuroplasty may be considered for patients with chronic lumbar LSS regardless of accompanying sarcopenia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chronic Neuropathic Pain Therapy and Anaesthesia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3941 KB  
Article
Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study
by Kimiaki Yokosuka, Kimiaki Sato, Kei Yamada, Tatsuhiro Yoshida, Takahiro Shimazaki, Shinji Morito, Kouta Nishida, Atsushi Matsuo, Takuma Fudo and Naoto Shiba
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1267; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051267 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2560
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients [...] Read more.
This study was conducted to analyze the findings and benefits of computed tomography (CT) epidurography in patients with low back and leg pain and compare these findings with those of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. In total, 495 intervertebral discs from 99 patients with low back and leg pain who underwent percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis (epidural neuroplasty or percutaneous adhesiolysis) were examined. The axial views of CT epidurography were classified into six types to examine each intervertebral disc: round type, ellipse type, spike type, Benz mark, incomplete block, complete block, and non-contrast. MRI images were graded from A to D using the Schizas classification. Notably, 176 images were round-type and ellipse-type axial views, and 138 were spike-type and Benz-mark views; Schizas classification Grades A and B were observed in 272 and 47 MRI images, respectively. The incomplete block and complete block axial images did not significantly differ in CT epidurography and Schizas classification Grades C and D. The images showing Benz marks existed only at the L4/5 and L5/S intervertebral levels and only in 14.7% of patients. The ratio of normal shadows differed between MRI images and CT epidurography. Therefore, CT epidurography may enable a detailed evaluation of the epidural space. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Paradigm Shift of Spinal Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1707 KB  
Article
Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Trans-Sacral Canal Plasty between Patients with and without Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
by Haruki Funao, Kimiaki Yokosuka, Junichi Ukai, Kazuo Nakanishi, Masaaki Paku, Takashi Tomita, Masahiro Hoshino, Takanori Saito, Ken Ishii and Koji Sato
Medicina 2022, 58(2), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020251 - 7 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3367
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Clinicians are required to manage a growing number of elderly patients with several medical comorbidities, and invasive surgical treatments are sometimes not advisable for these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive intraspinal [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Clinicians are required to manage a growing number of elderly patients with several medical comorbidities, and invasive surgical treatments are sometimes not advisable for these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of minimally invasive intraspinal canal treatment, trans-sacral canal plasty (TSCP), for patients with and without failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Materials and Methods: A multicenter analysis was conducted. TSCP was performed in patients with chronic low back pain and leg pain due to lumbar spinal disorders. An adhesiolysis by TSCP was carried out, then a mixture of steroid and local anesthesia was injected. Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, and complications were evaluated. Results: A total of 271 patients with a minimum 6-month follow-up were enrolled. There were 80 patients who had a history of previous lumbar spinal surgery (F group), and 191 patients without previous lumbar spinal surgery (N group). There were no significant differences in sex and age between the two groups. VAS scores for low back pain (N group/F group) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, were 51/52 mm, 24/26 mm, 33/34 mm, 30/36 mm, and 30/36 mm, respectively. VAS scores for leg pain were 69/67 mm, 28/27 mm, 39/41 mm, 36/43 mm, and 32/40 mm, respectively. Both VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain were significantly decreased from baseline to final follow-up in both groups (p < 0.01). However, VAS scores for leg pain at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in F group (p < 0.05). There were three catheter breakages (2/3 in F group), and one dural tear in F group. Conclusions: TSCP significantly reduced both VAS scores for low back and leg pain in patients with and without FBSS. However, co-existence of intractable epidural adhesion might be associated with less improvement in FBSS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1755 KB  
Article
Factors Associated with Successful Response to Balloon Decompressive Adhesiolysis Neuroplasty in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
by Yul Oh, Doo-Hwan Kim, Jun-Young Park, Gyu Yeul Ji, Dong Ah Shin, Sang Won Lee, Jin Kyu Park, Jin-Woo Shin and Seong-Soo Choi
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(11), 1766; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111766 - 23 Oct 2019
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3820
Abstract
Epidural neuroplasty, often called percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis, is often performed in refractory patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Recent studies have showed that decompressive adhesiolysis with an inflatable balloon catheter (balloon neuroplasty) is efficient in patients who experience refractory pain from [...] Read more.
Epidural neuroplasty, often called percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis, is often performed in refractory patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Recent studies have showed that decompressive adhesiolysis with an inflatable balloon catheter (balloon neuroplasty) is efficient in patients who experience refractory pain from epidural steroid injection or even epidural neuroplasty with a balloon-less catheter. However, exact indications or predictive factors for epidural balloon neuroplasty have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, to assess associated factors that could affect a favorable outcome, we analyzed a prospectively collected multicenter cohort of patients with chronic refractory lumbar foraminal stenosis after balloon neuroplasty. At the 6-month point in follow-up, 92 (44.4%) patients among 207 subjects were classified as successful responders according to a robust combination of outcome measures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that mild grade lumbar foraminal stenosis may be an independent factor associated with a successful response 6 months after balloon neuroplasty (odds ratio = 2.829; 95% confidence interval = 1.351–5.923; p = 0.006). However, we found that there were 29.4% and 24.6% successful responders with moderate and severe foraminal stenosis, respectively. Attempting balloon neuroplasty in refractory lumbar foraminal stenosis, especially mild grade, may be worthwhile. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Procedures for Chronic Spinal Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop