Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = parasymphyseal fracture

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 8378 KB  
Article
Mandibular Titanium Miniplates Change the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Mandible in the Case of Facial Trauma: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
by Nicolas Graillon, Jean-Marc Foletti, Yves Godio-Raboutet, Laurent Guyot, Andrea Varazzani and Lionel Thollon
Bioengineering 2023, 10(9), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10090994 - 22 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1978
Abstract
Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human [...] Read more.
Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human mandible carrying or not two parasymphyseal miniplates and applying a concentrated force of 2000 N to four different areas, including the insertion area, the area straddling the edge of the miniplates and the adjacent bone, at a distance from the miniplates on the symphysis, and on the basilar border of the mandible below the miniplates. Then, we compared the Von Mises stress distributions between the two models. In the case of an impact on the miniplates, the maximum Von Mises stress occurred in two specific areas, on the cortical bone at the posterior border of the two miniplates at a distance from the impact, while in the model without miniplates, the Von Mises stresses were homogenously distributed in the impact area. The presence of titanium miniplates in the case of trauma affects the biomechanical behaviour of the mandible and could cause more complex fractures. We recommend informing patients of this potential risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 731 KB  
Review
Orthodontic Approaches in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Scoping Review
by Alessandro Polizzi, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Antonino Lo Giudice, Gaetano Isola, Alberto Bianchi, Simona Santonocito, Rosalia Leonardi and Stefano Mummolo
Children 2023, 10(3), 605; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10030605 - 22 Mar 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5044
Abstract
Non-surgical approaches have been proposed in the management of mandibular fractures, especially in children, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on the clinical indications of conservative approaches. The aim of this scoping review is to provide the available evidence of the [...] Read more.
Non-surgical approaches have been proposed in the management of mandibular fractures, especially in children, but there is a lack of clear guidelines on the clinical indications of conservative approaches. The aim of this scoping review is to provide the available evidence of the role of the orthodontist in the management of mandibular fractures. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed to select eligible articles from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases according to precise inclusion criteria. The research questions were formulated as follows: “what is the scientific evidence concerning the rule of orthodontists in the management of mandibular fractures” and “the preferential use of the direct bonding technique with orthodontic brackets rather than rigid arch bars”? Seventeen articles were included. Five articles presented the use of removable acrylic splints or functional appliances, six articles concerned the employment of cemented acrylic or rigid splints, and six articles described the management of mandibular fractures in adults and children using orthodontic brackets or mini-screws. Most of these techniques have been employed in children and growing subjects, while fewer data were available regarding conservative treatments in adults. Preliminary evidence suggests that condylar and some minor parasymphyseal fractures in children may be managed with conservative approaches. In adults, minor condylar and stable body mandibular fractures with minimal displacement have been reduced similarly. However, there are no sufficient elements that could suggest the preferential use of orthodontic brackets over rigid arch bars in adults. Further randomized and non-randomized clinical trials with long follow-ups will be needed to better define the clinical indications of the orthodontic approaches in the management of mandibular fractures based on severity, location, and age. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Dentistry & Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 639 KB  
Article
Wire Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Mandible Fractures in Low Resource Settings: A Force Study
by Shekhar K. Gadkaree, Adeeb Derakhshan, Victor Nyabenda, Isaie Ncogoza, Gratien Tuyishimire and David A. Shaye
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2024, 17(1), 13-17; https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875221143605 - 20 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 203
Abstract
Study Design: Cadaveric investigation. Objective: Rigid internal fixation (RIF) using plates and screws is often not feasible in low and middle-income countries due to limited resources. Interosseous wiring to achieve semi-rigid fixation is often used, but lacks biomechanical force data. Herein we aim [...] Read more.
Study Design: Cadaveric investigation. Objective: Rigid internal fixation (RIF) using plates and screws is often not feasible in low and middle-income countries due to limited resources. Interosseous wiring to achieve semi-rigid fixation is often used, but lacks biomechanical force data. Herein we aim to quantitatively compare interosseous wiring to RIF. Methods: Cadaveric mandibles were fractured at the parasymphysis and angle. Fixation was achieved using interosseous wiring in both single wire loop and figure-of-eight formations, as well as plate and screw fixation (n = 5 for each fixation type at each fracture site). A force gauge was used to measure the number of Newtons (N) required to achieve diastasis and complete failure at the fixation site. Results: For angle fractures, the mean force required for initial diastasis was 4.1, 5.9, and 10.9 N for single wire, figure-ofeight wiring, and plating respectively (p < 0.001). Complete failure was achieved with 152.9, 168.9, and 237.6 N of force for the three methods, respectively (p < 0.001). Complete failure was achieved for parasymphyseal fractures with 197.7, 263.0, and 262.8 N of force for single wire, figure-of-eight wiring, and plating respectively (p = 0.002). Forces to achieve initial diastasis for parasymphyseal fractures were not statistically significant among the three fixation methods (p = 0.29). Conclusions: Figure-of-eight interosseous wiring resists comparable forces across mandibular fractures compared to the gold standard of plating. In resource-limited settings when plates and screws are not available, this technique can be considered to achieve semi-rigid fixation of mandibular fractures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 3734 KB  
Article
Analyzing the Fitting of Novel Preformed Osteosynthesis Plates for the Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Fractures
by Marc Anton Fuessinger, Mathieu Gass, Caroline Woelm, Carl-Peter Cornelius, Ruediger M. Zimmerer, Philipp Poxleitner, Stefan Schlager and Marc Christian Metzger
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(24), 5975; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245975 - 20 Dec 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3738
Abstract
Purpose: The known preformed osteosynthesis plates for the midface are helpful tools for a precise and fast fixation of repositioned fractures. The purpose of the current study is to analyze the precision of newly developed prototypes of preformed osteosynthesis plates for the mandible. [...] Read more.
Purpose: The known preformed osteosynthesis plates for the midface are helpful tools for a precise and fast fixation of repositioned fractures. The purpose of the current study is to analyze the precision of newly developed prototypes of preformed osteosynthesis plates for the mandible. Methods: Four newly designed preformed osteosynthesis plates, generated by a statistical shape model based on 115 CT scans, were virtually analyzed. The used plates were designed for symphyseal, parasymphyseal, angle, and condyle fractures. Each type of plate has three different sizes. For analysis, the shortest distance between the plate and the bone surface was measured, and the sum of the plate-to-bone distances over the whole surface was calculated. Results: A distance between plate and bone of less than 1.5 mm was defined as sufficient fitting. The plate for symphyseal fractures showed good fitting in 90% of the cases for size M, and in 84% for size L. For parasymphyseal fractures, size S fits in 80%, size M in 68%, and size L in 65% of the cases. Angle fractures with their specific plate show good fitting for size S in 53%, size M in 60%, and size L in 47%. The preformed plate for the condyle part fits for size S in 75%, for size M in 85%, and for size L in 74% of the cases. Conclusion: The newly developed mandible plates show sufficient clinical fitting to ensure adequate fracture reduction and fixation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3309 KB  
Article
Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Fixation Techniques for APC II Open-Book Injuries of the Pelvis
by Andreas Lipphaus, Matthias Klimek and Ulrich Witzel
Biomechanics 2021, 1(3), 321-333; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics1030027 - 5 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5667
Abstract
Open-book fractures are defined as the separation of the pubic symphysis or fractures of the rami and disruption of the anterior sacroiliac, sacrotuberous, and sacrospinal ligaments. They can be stabilized by fixation of the anterior arch. However, indications and advantages of additional placement [...] Read more.
Open-book fractures are defined as the separation of the pubic symphysis or fractures of the rami and disruption of the anterior sacroiliac, sacrotuberous, and sacrospinal ligaments. They can be stabilized by fixation of the anterior arch. However, indications and advantages of additional placement of iliosacral screws remain unknown. A CT-based model of the healthy pelvis was created and ligaments were modeled as tension springs. Range of motion of the sacroiliac joint and the pubic symphysis, and bone and implant stresses were compared for the physiological model, anterior symphyseal plating alone, and additional posterior fixation using two iliosacral screws. The range of motion of the sacroiliac joint was reduced for anterior symphyseal plating alone and further decrease was noted with additional posterior fixation. Von Mises stresses acting on the symphyseal plate were 819.7 MPa for anterior fixation only and 711.56 MPa for additional posterior fixation equivalent with a safety factor of 1.1 and 1.26, respectively. Implant stresses were highest parasymphyseal. While bone stresses exhibited a more homogeneous distribution in the model of the healthy pelvis and the model with anterior and posterior fixation, pure symphyseal plating resulted in bending at the pelvic rami. The analysis does not indicate the superiority of either anterior plating alone or additional posterior fixation. In both cases, the physiological range of motion of the sacroiliac joint is permanently limited, which should be taken into account with regard to implant removal or more flexible techniques for stabilization of the sacroiliac joint. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Injury Biomechanics and Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 272 KB  
Article
Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction
by Amin Rahpeyma, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi and Somayeh Abdollahpour
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(1), 15-19; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542 - 21 May 2015
Cited by 4
Abstract
Mandibular fractures are the second most common fractures of the face after the nasal bone. Mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture comprises 15.6 to 29.3% of mandibular fractures. Tooth loss in the fracture line is a known phenomenon, but space loss has not been evaluated comprehensively [...] Read more.
Mandibular fractures are the second most common fractures of the face after the nasal bone. Mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture comprises 15.6 to 29.3% of mandibular fractures. Tooth loss in the fracture line is a known phenomenon, but space loss has not been evaluated comprehensively in the literature. In a retrospective study, patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures, who had been treated from 2012 to 2013 in Mashhad University, Iran, Emdadi Hospital, were recalled. Patients with mandibular incisor tooth/teeth loss were included in the study. Space loss, the technique used to replace the lost tooth/teeth, upper and lower dental midline relationship, combination fracture or fractures in other facial skeleton, and type of treatment were evaluated. Of 98 patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures, 22.5% had incisor tooth/teeth loss. In this group, 73% had space loss. Only four patients had replaced the lost tooth/teeth. Dental midlines did not match each other in patients whose feature was evaluated. Open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates were used in symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures except one. Space loss after mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture with incisor tooth loss is a common error. The most important factor to prevent complications related to space loss following mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture accompanying incisor tooth loss is space preservation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 209 KB  
Article
A Prospective Study of Strut Versus Miniplate for Fractures of Mandibular Angle
by Amy S. Xue, John C. Koshy, Erik M. Wolfswinkel, William M. Weathers, Kristina P. Marsack and Larry H. Hollier
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2013, 6(3), 191-196; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1349213 - 24 Jun 2013
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 125
Abstract
This prospective randomized clinical trial compared the treatment outcomes of strut plate and Champy miniplate in fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Patients with mandibular angle fracture were consented and enrolled into this study. Exclusion criteria include patients with severely comminuted fractures. The patients [...] Read more.
This prospective randomized clinical trial compared the treatment outcomes of strut plate and Champy miniplate in fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Patients with mandibular angle fracture were consented and enrolled into this study. Exclusion criteria include patients with severely comminuted fractures. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the strut plate or Champy miniplate for angle fracture fixation. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the outcome. A total of 18 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to receive either the strut plate or Champy miniplate. Out of which five patients were excluded postoperatively due to complex fracture resulting in postoperative maxillomandibular fixation. The final enrollment was 13 patients, N = 6 (strut) and N = 7 (Champy). There was no statistically significant difference in the pretreatment variables. Nine of these patients had other associated facial fractures, including parasymphyseal and subcondylar fractures. Most of the (11) patients had sufficient follow-up after surgery. Both groups exhibited successful clinical unions of the mandibular angle fractures. The complications associated with the mandibular angle were 20% in the strut plate group and 16.7% in the Champy group. One patient in the strut plate group had a parasymphyseal infection, requiring hardware removal. The strut plate demonstrated comparable surgical outcome as the Champyminiplate. It is a safe and effective alternative for management of mandibular angle fracture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

4 pages, 135 KB  
Article
Bite Force Measurement in Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures: A Preliminary Clinical Study
by Rajesh Kshirsagar, Nitin Jaggi and Rajshekhar Halli
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2011, 4(4), 241-244; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1293521 - 4 Nov 2011
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 121
Abstract
We measured the amount of bite force generated by patients treated for parasymphyseal fractures of the mandible by open reduction and internal fixation at various predetermined time intervals. Sixty volunteers ranging from 18 to 60 years old were selected as the control group. [...] Read more.
We measured the amount of bite force generated by patients treated for parasymphyseal fractures of the mandible by open reduction and internal fixation at various predetermined time intervals. Sixty volunteers ranging from 18 to 60 years old were selected as the control group. All measurements were made on a bite force measurement device with the head in an upright position and in an unsupported natural position. Bite forces were measured at the incisor and right and left molar regions. These bite forces were compared with six patients with isolated mandibular unilateral parasymphyseal fractures. All patients were operated using open reduction and internal fixation using two miniplates at the fracture site. In the volunteer group, bite forces ranged from 22 to 50 kg in the molar region and 3 to 27 kg in the incisor region. Mean adult healthy values (male and female) in the molar region were 36 kg and in the incisor region, 15 kg. In mandibular parasymphyseal fractures, incisor bite forces were reduced significantly when compared with the control group in the first 2 postoperative weeks and regained significantly thereafter till 4 to 6 weeks. Bite forces in the molar region took ∼6 to 12 weeks to regain maximum bite forces when compared with the volunteer group. Restoration of functional bite forces was evident by 6 to 8 weeks. However, the restoration of maximum bite forces may require up to 12 weeks in parasymphyseal fractures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop