Next Article in Journal
The Role of a Conservative Minimal Interventional Management Protocol in the Fractures of the Dentate Portion of the Adult Mandible
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive-Glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction

by
Amin Rahpeyma
1,
Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
2,* and
Somayeh Abdollahpour
3
1
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2
Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3
Student of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(1), 15-19; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542
Submission received: 9 August 2014 / Revised: 12 January 2015 / Accepted: 12 January 2015 / Published: 21 May 2015

Abstract

:
Mandibular fractures are the second most common fractures of the face after the nasal bone. Mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture comprises 15.6 to 29.3% of mandibular fractures. Tooth loss in the fracture line is a known phenomenon, but space loss has not been evaluated comprehensively in the literature. In a retrospective study, patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures, who had been treated from 2012 to 2013 in Mashhad University, Iran, Emdadi Hospital, were recalled. Patients with mandibular incisor tooth/teeth loss were included in the study. Space loss, the technique used to replace the lost tooth/teeth, upper and lower dental midline relationship, combination fracture or fractures in other facial skeleton, and type of treatment were evaluated. Of 98 patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures, 22.5% had incisor tooth/teeth loss. In this group, 73% had space loss. Only four patients had replaced the lost tooth/teeth. Dental midlines did not match each other in patients whose feature was evaluated. Open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates were used in symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures except one. Space loss after mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture with incisor tooth loss is a common error. The most important factor to prevent complications related to space loss following mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture accompanying incisor tooth loss is space preservation.

Mandibular fractures are the second most common fractures of the face after the nasal bones. [1] Mandibular symphyseal fracture accounts for 15.6 to 29.3% of mandibular fractures. [2,3]
Tooth loss in the fracture line is a known characteristic of jaw fractures. [4] Indications for removal of the tooth in the fracture line are unrestorable crown, crown/root fractures, vertical root fractures, and severe periodontal disease. [5] The basic principle is to retain the tooth in the fracture line as much as possible to help register the occlusion accurately, especially in the symphyseal area. [6]
Tooth loss occurs as a result of avulsion or intentional extraction during the treatment of mandibular fractures. Forgetting the principle of “restoring preinjury occlusion” in the treatment of mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures with incisor tooth loss may cause problems in obtaining acceptable occlusion and facial esthetics as well as prosthodontic problems.

Materials and Methods

All the procedures were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (number 922450). In a retrospective study, patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphy-seal fractures, who had been operated in 2012 to 2013 in Emdadi Hospital, Mashhad University, Iran, were recalled. Patients with maximum 1-year follow-up were included in this study to mitigate the factor of tooth movement near the lost tooth and its effect in this study. Symphyseal/para-symphyseal fracture was defined as fracture line in mandibular bone between the canine teeth. These patients had not been treated by the same surgeon or the same technique. Patients with the loss of mandibular incisor tooth/ teeth in the fracture line were included in the study. Space loss was defined as remaining space insufficient for replacement of the lost incisor or decreased incisor tooth counts in intercanine space in the case of complete space closure. This ranged from slight to complete space loss (Figure 1). Methods by which the lost incisor(s) had been replaced were recorded. Control panoramic radiographs and photographs from each jaw and in the occlusion were obtained.
Upper and lower jaw study casts were made with alginate impression material and poured in dental stone. Upper-lower dental midlines were checked. Combination fractures or fractures in other facial skeleton were noted. Type of treatment, including closed or open reduction, was recorded. In the open reduction group, type of incision for access to the fracture line (intraoral, extraoral surgical incision, or through facial laceration) and finally type of internal fixation devices (wire, lag screw, miniplate, etc.) were noted.

Results

Of 98 patients with mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures that responded to the recall, 22 had mandibular incisor loss (22.5%). Twenty-eight patients had another facial fracture, including zygoma, nose, or Le Fort fractures. Among them, 16 patients (73%) had space loss in the mandibular dental arch. Only 36 patients had isolated mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture. Forty patients had multiple mandibular fractures with the accompanying condylar fracture (30%) at the top of the list.
Twenty-two patients with mandibular symphyseal/para-symphyseal fracture and incisor tooth loss that included in the study have mean age of 32 ± 5.8. Male:female ratio was 4:5. Demographic information of these patients is demonstrated in Table 1. Loss of four incisor teeth with the least frequency rate (9%) and one incisor tooth with the highest frequency rate (54.5%) were at the bottom and top of the list, respectively. Only four patients had replaced the lost incisors with dental prosthetic appliances, all with multiple incisors lost. Removable partial denture was the only method used for multiple incisor teeth loss but with artificial teeth, less in the count in comparison with what should have been replaced (Figure 2).
Upper and lower dental midlines could not be evaluated in 10 patients because of the lost maxillary incisors or tooth loss that included both mandibular central incisors. In remaining patients (12 patients), the upper and lower dental midlines were off, although we had no documents to evaluate the pretrauma state of the midlines in these patients. All the patients except one had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation with miniplates. Extraoral access to the symphyseal bone had been used in eight patients.

Discussion

Postoperative occlusal discrepancy is less prominent when the tooth in the line of fracture is preserved. [7] Space problem is more prominent in mandibular anterior region because of thin cortical bones and comminuted fractures. Tightening the wires passed in two sides of fracture line permits the fractured segments to come closer. Considering the mobility of the teeth adjacent to the fracture line, this movement will cause some problems in the fabrication of prosthetic appliances, occlusion, and facial esthetic.
Available space for prosthodontic replacement of the lost tooth is an important factor. In all the cases in which one incisor tooth had been lost, resulting in space loss (if the space had not been closed completely), the edentulous space had been left neglected without prosthetic replacement.
Occlusion is also influenced by this error. The classic occlusal problems were observed in cases in which symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture was not accompanied with maxillary fractures. In such cases, mandibular symphyseal fracture leads to dental arch narrowing in anterior mandible and widening in posterior segment, especially if it is accompanied with mandibular condylar fractures. [8] A gap in the mandibular inferior border appears on radiographs when this error in the treatment happens and the lingual cusps of the mandibular posterior teeth fall out of the occlusion (Figure 3).
Maxillary fractures that involve the palate and alveolar arch, especially the sagittal and parasagittal fracture of the palate, often lead to widened maxillary dental arch in the anterior region. [9] Combination of these two fractures without width control leads to grave prosthodontic problems (Figure 4).
Facial esthetic problems are the other feature of this error. Mandibular asymmetry in the chin, when the incisor tooth loss is unilateral to the midline and the space is closed, is the rule. The facial asymmetry is less than expected. The reason may be the fact that slight space closure has no negative effect here and the fact that at least some part of the space closed is dental rather than skeletal. This asymmetry may extend to other parts of the face, when panfacial fracture happens and decision is to use the mandible as the reference (bottom-to-top concept) and the mandibular symphyseal fracture is the starting point for fixation. In this condition, it is our opinion not the fact from the results of this study that closure of the lost space in the mandibular incisor region in panfacial fracture patients causes facial asymmetry that affects the whole face (Figure 5).
The fact that most patients with space loss belonged to the open reduction and internal fixation group does not show that this method is inferior to the closed treatment method. Its explanation is that the more severe the injury, the greater the need for open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture.
The prevention of these problems is possible if the surgeon is aware of such a complication. Maintaining the space with simple appliances such as braided wires or the cut end of a plastic needle cup between the two segments is the solution (Figure 6). Retaining the fractured root cannot prevent loss of the space.
The treatment of established malocclusion as the result of this error is difficult. Regaining the space in slight space loss might be possible by orthodontic tooth movements, but in more severe cases, it needs corrective surgery.
Mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal osteotomy (straight cut) with bone graft or sliding monocortical osteotomy without bone graft is the suggested surgical procedure. Osteodistraction is the other option.
Theoretically, extraoral incisions that expose labial, lingual, and inferior mandibular border permit the surgeon to check the fracture line from several aspects. [9] The presence of posterior teeth, if used for maxillomandibular fixation, can also mitigate this problem.

Conclusion

Space loss after mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fracture with incisor tooth loss is a common error. The most important factor to prevent complications related to space loss following mandibular symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures accompanying incisor tooth loss is space preservation.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant (number 922450) from the vice chancellor.

References

  1. Bormann, K.H.; Wild, S.; Gellrich, N.C.; et al. Five-year retrospective study of mandibular fractures in Freiburg, Germany: incidence, etiology, treatment, and complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67, 1251–1255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Dongas, P.; Hall, G.M. Mandibular fracture patterns in Tasmania, Australia. Aust Dent J 2002, 47, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Motamedi, M.H. An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: a 5-year study of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003, 61, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Chrcanovic, B.R. Teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014, 18, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Spinnato, G.; Alberto, P.L. Teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2009, 17, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Rai, S.; Pradhan, R. Tooth in the line of fracture: its prognosis and its effects on healing. Indian J Dent Res 2011, 22, 495–496. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Gerbino, G.; Boffano, P.; Bosco, G.F. Symphyseal mandibular fractures associated with bicondylar fractures: a retrospective analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67, 1656–1660. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Werther, J.R. Fixation of sagittal fractures of the maxilla. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991, 87, 198–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rahpeyma, A.; Khajehahmadi, S.; Barkhori Mehni, S. Treatment of mandibular fractures by two perpendicular mini-plates. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2014, 26, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Slight space loss. (b) Moderate space loss. (c) Complete space loss.
Figure 1. (a) Slight space loss. (b) Moderate space loss. (c) Complete space loss.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g001
Figure 2. Removable retainer is used for replacement of the lost incisors. In this case, intercanine incisor teeth count is two instead of four.
Figure 2. Removable retainer is used for replacement of the lost incisors. In this case, intercanine incisor teeth count is two instead of four.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g002
Figure 3. Lingual cusps of the mandibular posterior teeth are out of occlusion in centric occlusion. (a) Schematic picture. (b) Photograph taken from behind the casts, mounted in the articulator.
Figure 3. Lingual cusps of the mandibular posterior teeth are out of occlusion in centric occlusion. (a) Schematic picture. (b) Photograph taken from behind the casts, mounted in the articulator.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g003
Figure 4. Combination of mandibular symphyseal fracture with space loss and maxillary palatal fracture without width control.
Figure 4. Combination of mandibular symphyseal fracture with space loss and maxillary palatal fracture without width control.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g004
Figure 5. (a) Chin asymmetry in the case of lost incisor with complete space closure. (b) Schematic picture represents the mechanism of chin asymmetry. (c) Error in management of the lost mandibular central incisor in panfacial fracture leads to facial asymmetry extends to the nose because the anterior nasal spine is not coinciding with facial midline.
Figure 5. (a) Chin asymmetry in the case of lost incisor with complete space closure. (b) Schematic picture represents the mechanism of chin asymmetry. (c) Error in management of the lost mandibular central incisor in panfacial fracture leads to facial asymmetry extends to the nose because the anterior nasal spine is not coinciding with facial midline.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g005
Figure 6. Prevention of space loss in mandibular anterior region after symphyseal fracture and incisor tooth loss, with space preservation.
Figure 6. Prevention of space loss in mandibular anterior region after symphyseal fracture and incisor tooth loss, with space preservation.
Cmtr 09 9i15 g006
Table 1. Demographic information of the patients with symphyseal/parasymphyseal(s/p) fracture and incisor tooth loss.
Table 1. Demographic information of the patients with symphyseal/parasymphyseal(s/p) fracture and incisor tooth loss.
Patients with s/p fracture and incisor tooth loss (22)Single mandibular fracture (s/p) 10 patientsSpace loss in 6 patients
Multiple mandibular fracture (s/p + …) except condyle 4 patientsSpace loss in 3 patients
Multiple mandibular fracture in (s/p + …) including condyle 8 patientsSpace loss in 7 patients

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahpeyma, A.; Khajehahmadi, S.; Abdollahpour, S. Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542

AMA Style

Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S, Abdollahpour S. Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2016; 9(1):15-19. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahpeyma, Amin, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi, and Somayeh Abdollahpour. 2016. "Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 9, no. 1: 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542

APA Style

Rahpeyma, A., Khajehahmadi, S., & Abdollahpour, S. (2016). Mandibular Symphyseal/Parasymphyseal Fracture with Incisor Tooth Loss: Preventing Lower Arch Constriction. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 9(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551542

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop